Slashdot Mirror


User: SiChemist

SiChemist's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
638
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 638

  1. Re:this linux thingy must be taking off... on 2.6.19 Linux Kernel Released · · Score: 1

    After you type the text you want to find, hit F3 to advance to the next instance of it.

  2. Re:A Rebuttal on An Inconvenient Truth · · Score: 1
  3. Re:What source is this? on US Slips Again In Freedom of the Press Ranking · · Score: 1

    Try out the media matters site.

  4. Re:What source is this? on US Slips Again In Freedom of the Press Ranking · · Score: 1

    One recent example of Fox news being untruthful leaps to mind. They labelled Foley a Democrat in their coverage of the scandal. Here's a link on Boing Boing, but you can find many other perspectives with a simple google search.

  5. Re:The sad thing is . . . on How Linux and Windows Stack Up in 2006 · · Score: 1

    Your users don't have to download autopackage. They just run the installer that you generate.

  6. Re:"OK, Paul" on Apple vs Microsoft- Who's the Copycat? · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I almost laughed out loud when I read this at the end of the article:

    I'm no Microsoft cheerleader (sorry, it's true).
    Who is he trying to convince?
  7. Re:Heresy! on OSS on Windows the Next Big Thing? · · Score: 1

    sudo apt-get --build source bash

    What do I win?

  8. Re:As Usual, The Write-Up Is Dubious At Best on House Passes Ban on Social Site Access · · Score: 1

    So, who goes around "making the case" for a site's educational value? And, who decides whether the "case has been made"? It seems to me that there is plenty of room for abuse there.

  9. Re:Further explenation on How to Deal w/ Dubious 'Contracts'? · · Score: 1

    The phrase "verbal contract" has a specific meaning in English that you appear to ignore. Perhaps you should learn English and stop your baseless criticism of others.

  10. Mynd you, møøse bites Kan be pretty nast on Paul Thurrott Bitten by WGA · · Score: 1

    No realli! She was Karving her initials on the møøse with the sharpened end of an interspace tøøthbrush given her by Svenge - her brother-in-law - an Oslo dentist and star of many Norwegian møvies: "The Høt Hands of an Oslo Dentist", "Fillings of Passion", "The Huge Mølars of Horst Nordfink".

  11. Re:Too late? on ReactOS Reviewed in Depth · · Score: 1

    Wine Is Not an Emulator! It's a compatibility layer. Applications run at or near native speeds. I personally use it to play a few older 3D strategy and FPS games. It works great.

  12. Re:get this straight, okay? on NH Man Arrested for Videotaping Police · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that the parent to your post was sarcasm. At least, I hope it was.

  13. Re:This is what we're talking about on Stem Cells Cure Paralyzed Rats · · Score: 1

    However, there is reasonable support for the existence of the soul, and a trip from Plato through Plotinus would do you good.

    Just exactly what is the "reasonable support" for the existence of a soul? You have an objective, independently verifiable answer?

  14. Re:Why not? on Firefox to Drop Pre-Windows 2000 Support · · Score: 1

    True, but then how many of these current Linux distributions can really run ont a P2 400MHz /w 64 or 128Megs of RAM?

    It's funny you should ask this. I had (before Katrina) a Dell P2 400 with 128 MB RAM that I used as my "throwaway" machine to test out new Linux distributions. The last OS it was running before I lost it was Simply Mepis. It wasn't a speed demon, but it did perform acceptably.

    Before that, I had Suze 9 on it and before that, Debian unstable. They were all the then-current versions of the OS installed during the last couple of years. I did find that the biggest performance booster was adding RAM. Shortly before I lost it, I had bumped it up to 256 MB RAM(PC 100) and saw a significant improvement in performance.

  15. Re:Why not? on Firefox to Drop Pre-Windows 2000 Support · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would say the main reason you don't see many machines running that vintage of Linux is that they could be upgraded to a newer version for free. I don't think there will ever be a large number of machines running an extremely obsolete version of a free operating system.

  16. Re:Oh well... on Can Ordinary PC Users Ditch Windows for Linux? · · Score: 1

    It's because of the ~$5 license fees that are required for the patents on decoding MPEG2 video.

    The license fee isn't for the MPEG2 decoder, it's for CSS (content scrambling system) with which most commercial DVDs are encrypted. You could probably play an unencrypted DVD without it.

  17. Re:It really is the learning curve on Can Ordinary PC Users Ditch Windows for Linux? · · Score: 1

    Most families have larger requirements (non-simple games, videos, making DVDs, etc) and no free support from a Linux techie.

    I would dispute this. Most of my mom's friends and my aunts and uncles would be perfectly happy with the aforementioned level of functionality.

  18. Re:Oh well... on Can Ordinary PC Users Ditch Windows for Linux? · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which of those distributions has a legal DVD player and has plugin support for all the latest Real/QT/Windows Media formats?

    Does Windows come with all that? The last time I checked, you had to install a DVD player and real/qt (and some windows media) formats.

  19. Re:Understandable on Busting People for Pointing Out Security Flaws · · Score: 1

    It is their job to find the truth of a crime. In practice, it seems that the office is often just a jumping off point for a political career. To meet that goal, the prosecutor needs a high conviction rate.

  20. Re:Linux is NOT Fat on Negroponte says Linux too 'Fat' · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong, I see great potential for Linux & I love the concept of OSS but lets call a spade a spade & start being honest about what needs fixing ok?

    The problem is, my experience is completely different from yours. I DON'T have the problems you claim "the majority of users experience major hassles with." It sounds like hyperbole to me.

  21. Re:Linux is NOT Fat on Negroponte says Linux too 'Fat' · · Score: 1

    Which "most folks" are you referring to? And why would you want to give away the memory saving advantages of shared libraries? Multiple applications can use the same shared library copy that is loaded into RAM.

  22. Re:Linux is NOT Fat on Negroponte says Linux too 'Fat' · · Score: 1

    Why exactly are you harping on the "average person, average distribution" crap? There have been many posts that point out this is a custom hardware platform for which there will almost certainly be a custom version of Linux installed. Linux runs quite well on many platforms with lower specs than this laptop.

  23. Re:STFU Bruce and write some code ...... on Bruce Perens on the Status of Open Source · · Score: 1

    Linux, the OS for people who hate Windows.

    I've seen this posted many times and I wonder why it has become such a catchphrase. I use Linux because I LIKE Linux. I used Windows for years before and I just plain like Linux better. I think that the majority of Linux users would say the same. It's the users who don't like Linux that keep advancing that meme.

  24. Re:Yeah, this is interesting... on Bruce Perens on the Status of Open Source · · Score: 1

    You present a false dichotomy: "Businesses do have a legitimate interest in getting their concerns before congress, and if a lobbyist is the only way to do it, then that's what they have to do."

    You imply that lobbying is the only way for a business to address its concerns to congress. That is certainly NOT the case. Lobbying is a way for a business to press its concerns above those of the common people that can't afford to spend that money bribing their representative (or senator).

    There is nothing preventing a business owner from just picking up the phone and calling the congresspeople who represent the business's district. Just like any other citizen.

  25. Re:For me it is on Bruce Perens on the Status of Open Source · · Score: 1

    Yes, because salespeople always outfit their own computers when it's windows, right? That's why there aren't any IT departments in the business world.