Not many bugs (http://bugme.osdl.org/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type =allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=File+System&pr oduct=IO%2FStorage&product=Memory+Management&produ ct=Networking&product=Other&product=Platform+Speci fic%2FHardware&product=Power+Management&product=Pr ocess+Management&product=Timers&component=ACPI&com ponent=AIO&component=APM&component=Block+Layer&com ponent=Configuration&component=devfs&component=DIO &component=Drivers&component=ext2&component=ext3&c omponent=Flash%2FMemory+Technology+Devices&compone nt=gettimeofday&component=I2O&component=i386&compo nent=IA-64&component=IDE&component=Input+Devices&c omponent=Interval+Timers&component=IPV4&component= IPV6&component=JFS&component=LVM2%2FDM&component=M D&component=MIPS&component=Modules&component=MTTR& component=NFS&component=NUMA%2Fdiscontigem&compone nt=Other&component=PA-RISC&component=Page+Allocato r&component=Parallel&component=PCI&component=PCMCI A&component=PNP%2FHotPlug&component=PPC-32&compone nt=PPC-64&component=Preemption&component=Realtime+ Clock&component=ReiserFS&component=S390-31&compone nt=S390-64&component=Samba%2FSMB&component=Schedul er&component=SCSI&component=SCSI+Drivers&component =Serial&component=Slab+Allocator&component=SPARC32 &component=SPARC64&component=USB&component=VFS&com ponent=Video&version=2.5&long_desc_type=allwordssu bstr&long_desc=&bug_status=OPEN&bug_status=ASSIGNE D&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=APPROVED&bug_stat us=REJECTED&bug_status=DEFERRED&bug_status=CLOSED& resolution=CODE_FIX&resolution=PATCH_ALREADY_AVAIL ABLE&resolution=INVALID&resolution=WILL_NOT_FIX&re solution=WILL_FIX_LATER&resolution=DUPLICATE&resol ution=UNREPRODUCIBLE&resolution=DOCUMENTED&resolut ion=INSUFFICIENT_DATA&resolution=MOVED&resolution= ---&bug_severity=blocking&bug_severity=high&bug_se verity=normal&bug_severity=low&rep_platform=All&em ailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&ema ilassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&email type2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=& changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue =&cmdtype=doit&order=Bug+Number&field0-0-0=noop&ty pe0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= shows 6 bugs) though as its an impovement as we can easily submit Kernel 2.5 bugs, there used to be an unoffical Kernel bugtracker but thats gone. Anyone know if they will start accepting bugs for 2.4/2.2/2.0?
Not many bugs (http://bugme.osdl.org/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type =allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=File+System&pr oduct=IO%2FStorage&product=Memory+Management&produ ct=Networking&product=Other&product=Platform+Speci fic%2FHardware&product=Power+Management&product=Pr ocess+Management&product=Timers&component=ACPI&com ponent=AIO&component=APM&component=Block+Layer&com ponent=Configuration&component=devfs&component=DIO &component=Drivers&component=ext2&component=ext3&c omponent=Flash%2FMemory+Technology+Devices&compone nt=gettimeofday&component=I2O&component=i386&compo nent=IA-64&component=IDE&component=Input+Devices&c omponent=Interval+Timers&component=IPV4&component= IPV6&component=JFS&component=LVM2%2FDM&component=M D&component=MIPS&component=Modules&component=MTTR& component=NFS&component=NUMA%2Fdiscontigem&compone nt=Other&component=PA-RISC&component=Page+Allocato r&component=Parallel&component=PCI&component=PCMCI A&component=PNP%2FHotPlug&component=PPC-32&compone nt=PPC-64&component=Preemption&component=Realtime+ Clock&component=ReiserFS&component=S390-31&compone nt=S390-64&component=Samba%2FSMB&component=Schedul er&component=SCSI&component=SCSI+Drivers&component =Serial&component=Slab+Allocator&component=SPARC32 &component=SPARC64&component=USB&component=VFS&com ponent=Video&version=2.5&long_desc_type=allwordssu bstr&long_desc=&bug_status=OPEN&bug_status=ASSIGNE D&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=APPROVED&bug_stat us=REJECTED&bug_status=DEFERRED&bug_status=CLOSED& resolution=CODE_FIX&resolution=PATCH_ALREADY_AVAIL ABLE&resolution=INVALID&resolution=WILL_NOT_FIX&re solution=WILL_FIX_LATER&resolution=DUPLICATE&resol ution=UNREPRODUCIBLE&resolution=DOCUMENTED&resolut ion=INSUFFICIENT_DATA&resolution=MOVED&resolution= ---&bug_severity=blocking&bug_severity=high&bug_se verity=normal&bug_severity=low&rep_platform=All&em ailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&ema ilassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&email type2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=& changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue =&cmdtype=doit&order=Bug+Number&field0-0-0=noop&ty pe0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= shows 6 bugs) though as its an impovement as we can easily submit Kernel 2.5 bugs, there used to be an unoffical Kernel bugtracker but thats gone. Anyone know if they will start accepting bugs for 2.4/2.2/2.0?
The Windows version of MySQL is as stable as the Unix version. Try it. If you don't like it, try PostgreSQL under Cygwin.
You can modify it, but you cannot redistribute the modifications as a binary.
I use Mailman and its great!
Try Qpopper
ibiblio hosts terabytes of Linux stuff, they definatly could fit LFS in!
... and Microsoft makes a clone of it!
It only has guides on compiling it into Apache, what about DSO?
SBC WebHosting.com is hosting some disgusting porn spammer thats sending me lots of porn spam and they DO NOT CARE!
:P
Not fixed yet.
I use kerberoes and I have these packages installed:
krb5-libs-1.1.1-29
krb5-configs-1.1.1-29
krb5-devel-1.1.1-29
Where can I get a security fix?
Waah!
Why hasn't Slashdot changed to postgresql?
Or better yet, SlashSQL?
Soo slow!
I'm running OpenSSH 3.4p1, any security fixes in 3.5p1?
Will it work with gcc 2.95.3?
Anyone know?
They seem to have a HTTP server on Port 80 running Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) PHP/3.0.18 PHP/4.2.2 mod_ssl/2.8.10 OpenSSL/0.9.6e and thier OS is freebsd
I could never get 3.3 to work. Does it still support Red Hat 6.2 as build system? (me was using RH6.2 to build LFS)
slashdot edited out my pre tags, get patch to make apache-ssl work in 1.3.27 here: http://www.smarttux.com/apache-1.3.27-fix.patch
apache_1.3.27_fix.patch
--- SSLpatch.old Sat Oct 5 00:47:02 2002 +++ SSLpatch Sat Oct 5 00:47:35 2002 @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ @@ -428,7 +439,11 @@ #define SERVER_BASEVENDOR "Apache Group" #define SERVER_BASEPRODUCT "Apache" - #define SERVER_BASEREVISION "1.3.26" + #define SERVER_BASEREVISION "1.3.27" -#define SERVER_BASEVERSION SERVER_BASEPRODUCT "/" SERVER_BASEREVISION +#ifdef APACHE_SSL +# define SERVER_BASEVERSION SERVER_BASEPRODUCT "/" SERVER_BASEREVISION " Ben-SSL/1.48"
When I posted the comment that mod_ssl file didn't exist, I tried it and it has a few bugs and its not on the modssl.org homepage yet
here is a copy of mod_ssl that works on 1.3.27 (remember, use --force), and for Apache-SSL I posted a patch to the Apache-SSL mailing list.
Whats the oldest compiler I can compile 2.5.40 on?