Slashdot Mirror


Building a Dead Silent PC

Jouster writes "The folks over at HardCoreWare.net have finally lost it. They built a PC that's well over twenty times quieter than their comparison PC (40 dB versus 65). And it's no sluggard, either: P4 2.80 GHz, 7200 RPM hard drive and--get this!--an overclocked to the max GeForce4 Ti 4200! The only fan in the entire system is in the PSU."

430 comments

  1. 20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Please explain how something can be 20x quieter...

    Exhibit A is 80 decibles.
    Exhibit B is 4 times quieter than Exhibit A.

    how does this math work?

    1. Re:20 times quieter? by Yakman · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I'm not an audio guy but from what a friend told me once dB isn't linear. So going from 96 to 98dB is actually twice as loud, or something along those lines.

      I'm sure someone smarter will explain it :)

    2. Re:20 times quieter? by Maniakes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Decibels are a logarithmic scale. 80 dB is ten times as loud as 70 dB. 65 dB is actually 10*10^.5 = 31.6 times quieter than 80 dB.

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    3. Re:20 times quieter? by Karora · · Score: 5, Informative
      Please explain how something can be 20x quieter...

      Decibels is a logarithmic scale.

      So 10db is 10x (power), 20db is 100x and so on.

      This might seem like they are understating the case, but in general 10db is considered to sound like "a doubling in volume" so a difference of 40db is roughly 2 to the 4th or 16x.

      Fiddle with a few db more and you can easily justify "20x quieter."

      --

      ...heellpppp! I've been captured by little green penguins!
    4. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd wager twice as quiet as 80 is 79 decibals (that's how decibals work IIRC). Go from there.

    5. Re:20 times quieter? by Roosey · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a logarithmic scale. The volume of the sound goes up ten times for every ten decibels. Here's some math and a comparison chart.

    6. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, gasp, it's simple math... 20 times quieter means it's 5% as loud, which you seem to prefer.

    7. Re:20 times quieter? by packeteer · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is also why radio antannea can be measured in decibles. They reproduce the signal X times as powerful. Thats why a the price differance between a 20 decible antannnnea and a 22 decible antannea is more than 10-20. Also this is why you have to be careful when buying speakers. You might not think its worth another $100 to go from 112 to 114 decibles but thats much louder.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    8. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      sound is measured in terms of power intensity... W/m^2 and is converted into decibels by taking the logarithm to base 10 and multiplying by 10... i.e., 10 log_10 (X)... so 3 dB is a doubling in sound intensity (not 2 dB)

    9. Re:20 times quieter? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >You might not think its worth another $100 to go from 112 to 114 decibles but thats much louder.

      Ever tried to find a clerk at a store who can tell you the effeciency rating of speakers?

      Why do they always try to keep that hidden? Do they really want people to buy the bargain basement "200 W" 85dB sensitivity heaters?

      Just a little fun you can have with store clerks in the Stereo aisle: Tell them that a 50 Watt RMS amp (5000 PMPO Watts) hooked up to 8 Ohm 85 dB sensitivity speakers is no louder than a 6.25 Watt RMS amp (625 PMPO Watts) hooked up to 4 Ohm 91 dB sensitivity speakers.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:20 times quieter? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      That depends. From a language point of view, if the $1 item is cheap in itself, then the same item for half the price will indeed be twice as cheap. If your post is offtopic, mine is twice as offtopic...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    11. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last time i checked, 31.6 was well over 20 :)

    12. Re:20 times quieter? by Graff · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Please explain how something can be 20x quieter...how does this math work?
      It doesn't. Something can't be 20 times less than something else. You can either have something which is 1/20 as quiet as something else or something which is 20 times LOUDER than something else. It is complete nonsense to talk about something being 20 times less or 20 times quieter.

      This is a common mistake which people make, you can see it all the time even in professional settings. You will often see people saying stuff like, "This will be three times less costly than other solutions." It's a sad state of affairs but I think that math skills are seriously deteriorating.
    13. Re:20 times quieter? by johnburton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think it's sad, it's just evolution of language. I think that it fairly clear what it means and it can be more convenient to phrase things that way so even if it's not the traditional way to say something it's a decent enough innovation. It has nothing to do with math skills, it's to do with English language usage, and that changes all the time.

      --
      Sig is taking a break!
    14. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human ear processes sound in a logarithmic way, that is the reason to use logarithmic units like dB. So if you want to hear some sound of A db=10^A twice strong you must receive a sound of (2xA) dB=10^(2xA) thatis not the linear 2x10^A that someone could expect.

      Bye.
      Pepe P.

    15. Re:20 times quieter? by Graff · · Score: 2
      It has nothing to do with math skills, it's to do with English language usage, and that changes all the time.
      OK, so English skills are deteriorating also! :)

      Actually, I do a lot of tutoring for k-12 students as well as running an education program for a local Boys & Girls Club. I have spoken to many educators and they are pretty much all worried about the decreasing skills of our youth. I know that languages change over time, but many youth are not able to communicate effectively and have severe reading problems. These problems seem to be going much deeper than a simple change in language and they also seem to be manifesting in other disciplines.

      It's not the end of the world yet, but something does need to be done now in order to guarantee that the younger generations are able to cope in "the real world". (And not just on that vapid MTV show either...)

      Today's off-topic discussion is brought to you by the number 5 and the letter E...
    16. Re:20 times quieter? by nathanh · · Score: 3, Informative
      Decibels is a logarithmic scale.

      Yes.

      So 10db is 10x (power), 20db is 100x and so on.

      Yes.

      This might seem like they are understating the case, but in general 10db is considered to sound like "a doubling in volume" so a difference of 40db is roughly 2 to the 4th or 16x.

      No. 3dB is a doubling in volume. The relevant formula is dB = 10 log(P/P0). You got the 10x and 20x right so I'm guessing you just typoed.

    17. Re:20 times quieter? by Seahawk · · Score: 5, Informative

      mod this one down plz!!!

      +10db is twice as loud to the human ear!

      So the 65 db down to 40 db should be something like 5-6 times less loud to the human ear!

      Its the energy that is 10 times as big when you go up 10db!

      Example:
      A 10W stereo plays x db
      A similar stereo with 100W plays x + 10 db
      A similar stereo with 1000W plays x + 20 db

    18. Re:20 times quieter? by Maniakes · · Score: 4, Informative

      +10db is twice as loud to the human ear!

      You're right, but I'm not wrong. For a full explanation

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    19. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think he was referring to the fact that there is the human perception of sound which has to be considered.

      I think the statement that 10db is roughly perceived to be a doubling in volume is not far off.

    20. Re:20 times quieter? by packeteer · · Score: 4, Informative

      HAHA its so true. I just read another post i was goign to reply to but saw you so let me go off here. The wattage of a stereo doesn't matter. Its does matter in that its part of the equation but not the total measurement. I have seen peizo electric and other speakers that run off fractions of a watt that can put out over a hundred decibles. I hate all this crap about "i have a 500w stereo, oh yah well mines 600w". Some speakers can make it up to 130dB but will start to distort at 110dB, where as some wont distort up to 115dB but can only go to 125dB. Which one would you rather have? Im tired of people doing stupid things with speakers. Running 1kw systems in their drunks using $5 cables that have way over acceptable limits of capacitance. And dont even start on capacitors they sell for subs in your trunk. Thats just total bullshit. When the sub runs out of power its because of impedance on the line most likely from bad connections (solder em if you really want good sound) or just plain bad wires (10 gauge wont cut it). Personally im going to stick with my mono radio output and take the $1000 i saved and do something better.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    21. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so English skills are deteriorating also!

      That sentence is very disturbing. "There be something f'ed up with the youth, d00d, because they can't speak no proper english."

    22. Re:20 times quieter? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. It's a language quirk that entered into usage while nobody was paying attention and there's nothing anyone can do about it now. Is a razor blade that is "twice as thin" the same as one that is half as thick? We have units for measuring thickness (mm, etc.) but what unit do we have for measuring thinness? or quietness for that matter?
      Here's another perspective, if something is twenty times quieter, how quiet is something that is one time quieter? Logically, shouldn't "one time quieter" mean just plain silent?

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    23. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually 3db is a doubling of power. The human ear hears a doubling at around 10db. Remember the human ear does not "hear" the power.

    24. Re:20 times quieter? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Sorry, cant quantify offtopic.
      In as much as you can't quantify 'freezing' 'boiling'
      It's your moral duty as a /.er to correct people who use phrases such as 'more offtopic' 'really freezing' 'very boiling'. (And hurt them)

    25. Re:20 times quieter? by odaiwai · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Evolution of language, in this context, usually means "I r 2 thik 2 figger stuff out properly, so I'll pretend to be a champeen of da noo engrish."

      dave

    26. Re:20 times quieter? by elohim · · Score: 1

      So is this just a convention in English? If I understand correctly, only increases in size are quantifiable in language. Saying x is twenty times as a large as y or that y is one twentieth as large as x is correct, but to say that y is twenty times as small as x or that x is a twentieth as small as y is incorrect. All four phrases mean the same thing, but the latter two are unacceptable. Is this accurate? Please let me know, as I do enjoy semantics. :)

    27. Re:20 times quieter? by wheany · · Score: 1

      And the comparsion PC isn't 20 times as loud as their silent PC. Since 10 dB means 10 times the power, 65-40=25 dB = 315 times the power

      10 dB =10 times
      20 dB =10 dB + 10 dB = 10 * 10 = 100 times
      5 db = about 3 times

      25 dB = 20 dB + 5 dB = 100 * about 3 = about 300 times

    28. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the degredation in skills is due to the educators. Some K-12 teachers are idiots.

      Also, the focus of public primary schools seems to have shifted from getting people ready for high school (to get them ready for college) to getting people able to count the amount of change to return to you.

      P.S. This is fine with me. I don't plan to dump any children I have into public school, I plan for them to actually have an education (via home school).

    29. Re:20 times quieter? by Arker · · Score: 2

      So is this just a convention in English? If I understand correctly, only increases in size are quantifiable in language.

      Umm that doesn't sound right... lots of things besides increases in size are quantifiable in language... I must be misunderstanding you here.

      Saying x is twenty times as a large as y or that y is one twentieth as large as x is correct, but to say that y is twenty times as small as x or that x is a twentieth as small as y is incorrect. All four phrases mean the same thing, but the latter two are unacceptable. Is this accurate? Please let me know, as I do enjoy semantics. :)

      Hrmm... essentially correct. 'Times' here refers to multiplication, it's quite common to say 'twenty times smaller' but it is technically incorrect, if you multiply something smaller you multiply by a fraction, 'one-twentieth the size' (i.e. multiply by (1/20=.05)) would be correct. But it's a fairly obscure point that most people seem to just ignore.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    30. Re:20 times quieter? by arkanes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People have been worrying over the "decreasing skills of our youth" for the last 400 years, at least. The evolution of language and communication is always percieved as a decrease. This is not to say that AOL kiddies talking in single letters, upper case, 26 point pink and maroon letters doesn't make me grind my teeth with rage, but *your* idea of "communicate effectively" and the your great-grandchilds will probably be rather different. As an example, a couple hundered years ago, anyone who wanted to be taken seriously in academics(any field) HAD to be fluent in (at least) Latin. Now, hardly anyone uses it. A couple hundered years from now, probably even fewer. Remember, all these kids who you think won't be able to manage in the real world can talk to each other just fine. 40 years from now, YOU will be the one who can't communicate..

    31. Re:20 times quieter? by Chaswell · · Score: 1

      tack on to this list anyone who says that they are, "kinda pregnant."

    32. Re:20 times quieter? by Jouster · · Score: 2

      That still falls under "well over twenty times", doesn't it?

      Admittedly, I screwed up my math; I meant to claim "well over one hundred times", but it was late.

      Jouster

    33. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somebody paid attention in school....

    34. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the stupidity scale of news reporters.

      Something can be N times as loud, but can't be N times as quiet (because we don't define what quietness is).

      Perhaps 1/N times as loud is acceptable, but only the ...er...less intelligent catering to others similar to themselves in intelligence use such language as "N times quieter".

    35. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... 20x quieter = 1/20th of the loudness.

    36. Re:20 times quieter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'scuse me? Something can sure as hell be nx times slower/quiter/etc than something else. Frankly, it's sad this issue should even have to be discussed by someone past 4th grade.

      where n=multiplicative factor
      something*1/n=(how many times quiter/slower/etc).

      I hereby smite the parent with the 1/110*(average slashbot IQ) stick of stupidity. I hope the giant welt on his forehead will make him easier to identify next time.

    37. Re:20 times quieter? by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      3dB is a doubling in intensity. "Volume", on the other hand, is one of the terms used to describe the subjective sensation of loudness. So to say "10dB represents a doubling of volume" is actually a reasonably accurate statement.

    38. Re:20 times quieter? by elohim · · Score: 1

      What I meant to say is that maybe fold changes in size are only able to expressed verbally as increases. Thus we have the use of "times larger" or "1/20th the size (of something larger)".

    39. Re:20 times quieter? by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

      Get a life. Math skills aren't deteriorating over this colloquialism. Everyone knows that what's meant by "three times less" is "one-third". If you want to be that pendantic then attack the poor use of the language. Math has nothing to do with it.

    40. Re:20 times quieter? by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

      Can we not say, "Y is one-twentieth the size of X"? How about, "a twentyfold reduction"?

    41. Re:20 times quieter? by drblunt · · Score: 1
      by a fraction, 'one-twentieth the size' (i.e. multiply by (1/20=.05)) would be correct.

      ....Actually, if the debate on the symantecs of the statement still rages on, the above statement is STILL incorrect, as verified by the following statement:

      'Times' here refers to multiplication

      Ergo, in stating that something is one-twentieth the size, one is not expressly stating that it is multiplication that is being excercised. In order for the two above statements to be true, the following statement should be used:

      "One-twentieth times the size"

      --
      We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality.
    42. Re:20 times quieter? by Jouster · · Score: 2

      Math skills are deteriorating, but not because I post a mathematically-incorrect colloquialism to /.. Math skills are deteriorating because those with a very high-level understanding of math created tools to remove the tedium of math of less complexity, and then those without the high-level understanding adopted these tools. Eliminate calculators from the world, make them available only to those that have "earned" them, and you'll have done something about deteriorating math skills.

      As for my personal math skills, I can out-bitwise-manipulate anyone who cares to challenge me, and I have a decent understanding of single-variable calculus and an extensive understanding of theoretical physics.

      As for my wording: you may, if you wish, lambast a poorly-written program for uninformative variable names or lack of comments. You may even note that the program takes an extra run through the compiler before producing machine code. But the reality is that, in human language and in computers, it is the final, parsed data that counts. So long as your parser is capable of handling the statement, which it obviously is based on your comment, the difference in the "source code" is completely unimportant.

      All that said, thanks for calling me on it. I'm is always; trying to improve my's gRamerr, after all.

      Jouster
      (Story Author)

    43. Re:20 times quieter? by Jouster · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Congratulations, I'm sure your penis has been lengthened by this incredible postscript; I can't wait to meet your superior progeny some day when handing them change--the correct amount, of course.

      I would be working at a computer company making exorbitant sums of money and buying myself a brand new Camaro convertible, but, alas, I went through public school, so I guess I have to quit tomorrow and go apply for a job at WalMart.

      If you get a chance, please remind your children to remember to tip well when my public school-educated boss (one of the best sysadmins I know) brings by their pizza.

      Jouster
      (Story Author)

    44. Re:20 times quieter? by Jouster · · Score: 2

      I don't feel like defending my intelligence, so let's just ignore that comment.

      If you are able to decode the phrase, and those who are less intelligent can, as well, it would actually make sense to choose that phrase to ensure the maximum number of people would understand what I was trying to communicate.

      Jouster

    45. Re:20 times quieter? by Arker · · Score: 2

      "One-twentieth times the size"

      Of course, but in that context it's so well understood that it needn't be said anymore.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    46. Re:20 times quieter? by drblunt · · Score: 1

      How ironic. ( grin )

      --
      We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality.
    47. Re:20 times quieter? by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      >> Im tired of people doing stupid things with
      >> speakers. Running 1kw systems in their drunks
      >> using $5 cables that have way over acceptable
      >> limits of capacitance.

      Running electrified cable into a drunk speaker, while certainly entertaining, is illegal under most states' sodomy laws. Besides, you can remedy the problem by substituting their beer for soda. Sober speakers are usually not nearly as loud or obnoxious.

      Problem solved. My work here is done....

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  2. Re:FP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    If you made a first post from this PC, would anyone hear it?

  3. Sound from the computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you can hear the sound from your computer its a sign that your music is way to low

    1. Re:Sound from the computer by buswolley · · Score: 1
      When you live in a dorm, does it matter how loud your computer is?

      If that meat is tough, then at least this gravy will be Tender.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    2. Re:Sound from the computer by sahala · · Score: 2

      Noisy computer? I just turn my speakers off.

    3. Re:Sound from the computer by hype7 · · Score: 2

      If you can hear the sound from your computer its a sign that your music is way to low


      my recommendation for a mod that will make the computer "dead" silent - take out the power supply

      -- james
    4. Re:Sound from the computer by Jonny+Balls · · Score: 1

      and if the music is too loud, then you are too old!

      --
      --JonnyBlog
  4. Not as loud, but its still a space heater by jeramybsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Those who forget the apple are doomed to reinvent it. Apple has been using large heatsink, air flow design, etc for ever since the blueg3 to keep there from being too many fans in the system.

    However, an Apple still puts out much less heat overall and I notice the article didnt even try to find a quiet cdrom. I have 2 in my PC and both are loud as the dickens.

    --
    Never overestimate the end user. -jeramy b. smith
    1. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by PedsDoc · · Score: 1

      Actually, Apple's have been sans fan for longer than that... the original Macintosh was designed to work without a fan, too. Of course, it ran just a bit slower than things nowadays do.

    2. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by mayns · · Score: 1

      And what aboutthe floppy drive? Those things are rarely used these days, but can be terribly noisy.

    3. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Aronymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      If you need a quiet CD-ROM, use a slow one, like 16x or slower.

    4. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1

      you can limit the spin rate of any cd-rom drive with programmes like cd-bremse. makes a notable difference...

      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
    5. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Those who forget the apple are doomed to reinvent it. Apple has been using large heatsink"

      Who said Apple invented large heatsinks,airflow design, etc?

      I have been using large heatsinks, low powered quiet ducted fans, and passive coolers since the pentium days. My current machine has an 80x80mm heatsink with copper base embedded in it with an 80mm silent fan and its cooling an athlon XP 2100. The rest of my system is setup such that I have minimal airflow for the required cooling. Ducted air, large heatsinks, copper bases, etc etc..

      People have known about large heatsinks, passive cooling, etc way way way before Apple Computer started making PC's with passive heatsinks on it.

      Also, your post is irrelevant considering that Gateway, Dell, HP, Compaq has been doing the exact same thing in (many) of their systems as well for years. (check out dell optiplex, Gateway E-series, I dont know the compaq models, but I have seen some like this).

      Then consider the G4 cube. it was fanless, nice innovation. But then they put a loud as hell hard drive in it, the power switch went off intermittently due to overheating (it was heat sensitive) and they put a fan in it anyway when they put the 3D Video cards in it. (this video card fan was like a 40mm fan spinning fast as hell and it was not very quiet at all, all on top of a very very small heatsink which had plenty of room to be larger)

      Next, you are going to tell me that Apple invented thermodynamics? Please. Don't try to pretend Apple invented everything. They didn't. And they are far far far FAR from the ppl who started making silent PCs. Everyone has been making silence (and mostly, reduced noise) since the begining of cooling weather it be for cars, power lines, space shuttles, oil pipes, computers, whatever.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    6. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by lkeagle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's great... now will someone PLEASE make a CRT without that damned high frequency whine? ;-)

      My TV can be more annoying than my computer with all the fans at full blast!

      ~Loren

    7. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      I notice the article didnt even try to find a quiet cdrom. I have 2 in my PC and both are loud as the dickens.

      But how often are they spinning? The actual amount of time my CD-ROMs are spinning is probably and average of a few minutes a day... I probably spend an average of 20 total minutes a WEEK installing/ripping/burning, and the optical drives are silent the rest of the time.

      If you're gaming, I suppose the drive would be spinning much more often, but then you've usually got the game music/sfx playing fairly loudly anyway :P

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    8. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by catwh0re · · Score: 2

      I was going to write exactly this. Because low end apples are often used in the class room, they are one of the quietest and temperature coolest PC's available. There is nothing worse than being in a room with 25 noisy cheap PC's buzzing away. Interestingly, you'll notice Apple have been using quiet keyboards and drives for alot longer than other mainstream manufacturers. E.G. a cube is virtually silent, however change the HD to a foreign type and you'll find that you can now hear the HD cranking away.

    9. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, but Apple still has the problem that they're the most expensive guy in the game. Sorry, you can have the quietest PCs on the market, but when they cost 2-3x more than the average PC it ain't worth it bub.

    10. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 5, Insightful
      And what aboutthe floppy drive? Those things are rarely used these days, but can be terribly noisy.

      Easy: take it out. Since last year, I've been building PCs sans floppy drives. IMO, floppies have very little use these days; files are regularly larger than 1.4 (or 2.8) MB, making floppies pretty useless. Most modern BIOSes can boot directly from CDROM. I've been using USB flash drives (a friend has a "pen" style, I like to use Compact Flash w/ a USB adapter), they're faster, and to the topic, make no noise whatsoever.

      I remeber taking over the lab to download the 20+ floppies for Slackware back in '93...

    11. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought apple fans were loud, annoying elitist bastards, but that's me.

    12. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Jouster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *phew* I'm glad someone else hears it, too.

      It drives me nutty.

      Jouster

    13. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by john82 · · Score: 1

      Who said Apple invented large heatsinks, airflow design, etc? ... I have been using large heatsinks, low powered quiet ducted fans, and passive coolers since the pentium days. ... Also, your post is irrelevant considering that Gateway, Dell, HP, Compaq has been doing the exact same thing in (many) of their systems as well for years. ... And they are far far far FAR from the ppl who started making silent PCs

      Hmm... Sounds like Apple pre-dates your knowledge of computers.

      Apple has been making quiet computers since before the Mac came out. That would be before Gateway, Dell and Compaq were even in existance (not to mention Pentiums).

      And it's not like it's an afterthought either. The Mac engineers begged Jobs to let them use a fan. He refused, saying that he wanted the computer to be as quiet as possible. Granted, that 400k floppy was a loud mother. But when it wasn't in use the computer was silent.

    14. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0

      Lets get this straight right now.

      PowerBooks and PowerMacs still have and always will have fans.

      iBooks and iMacs do not.

      The eMac? I dunno nor care.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    15. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      The 'Apple invented everything' people are just living out the tradition that was celebrated wildly in the Stalinist Soviet Union of claiming everything was invented there. Remember Checkov in Star Trek?

    16. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Apple has been making quiet computers since before the Mac came out. That would be before Gateway, Dell and Compaq were even in existance (not to mention Pentiums)."

      Before the pentium, x86 PC's didn't have fans in them. If they did, it was 1 very slow fan in the PSU. IIRC, most of the pre-Mac apple PSU's also contained fans in them. If you like, I will go through the apple parts database and find all the models that contain fans. But I'm not at work now, so it will have to be later. So your point is irrelevant. Back then, cooling and noise was a non issue, and we didn't have 300-400W going through our computers. Fans were slow, small, and didn't push much air, thus noise was not an issue.

      Yes, my first hand computer knowledge starts around the intel 386, that doesn't mean I don't know anything about old PC's (Personal Computers, I don't mean x86 here). My 386 had 1 fan; it was in the PSU. So it was just as quiet as the apples.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    17. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by naarok · · Score: 1

      Although most modern BIOSs can boot from CD, I've setup a number of 486 and early 586 machines as linux firewalls, gateways, etc. Still need the floppy for them, but a number of PC stores in my area have stopped stocking floppy disks. Despite the fact that Linux works fine on older equipment, we may one day no longer be able to support this older equipment because of lack of floppies. Who would have expected the useful life of a machine to be limited by the availability of floppies?

    18. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by RealTime · · Score: 1
      If you're gaming, I suppose the drive would be spinning much more often, but then you've usually got the game music/sfx playing fairly loudly anyway

      You can eliminate most CD-ROM noise by using CloneCD to image the data CDs you use often, and then using something like Daemon-Tools to mount these images. This works (in Windows systems, anyway) even with most copy-protected game CDs, as Daemon-Tools emulates most CD copy protections. This assumes you have large hard disks...

      --

      Yesterday it worked; today it is not working; Windows is like that...

    19. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People have known about large heatsinks, passive cooling, etc way way way before Apple Computer started making PC's with passive heatsinks on it."

      Apple was doing this before the IBM PC The first Apple II did not have a fan and it was out long before the IBM PC. Also the first MacIntosh did not have a fan and that was in 1984

    20. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty stinkin' funny post, if you ask me!

    21. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Who would have expected the useful life of a machine to be limited by the availability of floppies?

      Uh, many people. When was the last time you saw an 8" floppy? Or even a 5 1/4" floppy?

      Before that, various tape formats have been obsoleted.

      CD media is supposed to last 100 years, but I bet in 10-15 years we'll have trouble getting drives to read them, too. (I know that is a bit backwards from having no media for old hardware, but oh well.)

    22. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      Of course, then we get into the Timex Sinclair and friends...

    23. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by jn42 · · Score: 1

      Few of the first few generations of desktop computers had fans, many didn't have heatsinks. What's the big deal anyway? Everybody bitching about "Apple First" "Apple NOT First", "Apple Invented" yadayadayada. The original statement did NOT claim apple "Invented" heatsinks and such, just pointed out that they were an early and explicitly intended quiet system.

      For myself, in the last month I've updated to Zalman power supply and Zalman Athlon cooler, and together with Seagate HD my system is nearly silent. (Geforce3 cooling is loudest, except highest-speed CD/DVD access) Three weeks ago I could (No Lie!) hear my computer from any room in my home. Today I can barely hear it sitting with it next to my knee.

      The simple point is that you CAN build a machine which is NOT based on slower, cooler, outdated technology, without feeling like you have a wind-tunnel under your desk. Most ordinary consumers find this fact surprising (they have come to expect noise from their system) and promising. (Few really WANT all the noise)

      Anybody wanting a nearly silent system can achieve it WITHOUT necessarily sacrificing speed or power, with a few judicious (and noticably more expensive, but not painfully so) component choices. (Like avoiding/removing Maxtor drives :^)

      j

    24. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why does that happen? I hate that fucking noise. Sometimes CRT monitors do that too. And the pitch changes when the rez changes. I have one TV where the pitch changes dependent on the signal hitting the TV (like it's different if the INFO menu from the cable box is open).

    25. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      15625 Hz... It's a slightly flat B-natural... I used to tune to it as a last resort when I played a lot more music than I do now ;-)

      ~Loren

    26. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      It's the natural scanline frequency of the horizontal refresh rate of the monitor. For television, it's a constant frequency, so the pitch really only changes volume based on the brightness of the screen.

      For multisync non-interlaced monitors, the refresh rates change based on your resolution, hence the change in pitch. Of course, whenever there are sharp lines on the screen (especialy TV screens), you'll really start to hear harmonics of the vertical refresh rate as well!

      The cause is the high voltages that are used in order to bend the electron beam toward the aperture grill on the screen. The constant changing of voltages causes minute vibrations throughout the entire system that can be heard as an audible whine.

      I wish that they would come out with a TV with active noise reduction for those predominant frequencies. Doesn't seem like it would be too difficult a task, heck you might even be able to do it with the speaker on the TV! I'd be willing to pay the extra $50-$100 mark-up for a feature like that... (even though the circuitry probably won't cost more than $0.99)...

      ~Loren

    27. Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater by Megahurtz · · Score: 1

      USB drives and compact flash may be silent but they are rather cost prohibitive, and I have yet to hear of a 20GB (Heck, greater than 1GB) model... Just my $0.02

      --
      --- You are unique, just like everyone else...
  5. Re:A great accomplishment by pompomtom · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Always too loud"????

    My atari 1040ST is silent.

    --

    Buckets,

    pompomtom

    "There's an exception to every rule. Except for some rules"
  6. silence overrated? by mackstann · · Score: 4, Insightful
    i used to always strive to quiet my computer more and more, undervolting fans to 7v or 5v, i had my p233 absolutely SILENT, except for the loud hard drive.

    but now, building my new system, i have 4 moderate (sound) volume fans, but they really dont bother me. they produce a calm whir, and they're actually kind of soothing at night :P

    but the whole silent pc thing isnt all that hard, really. just put in some panaflo L1A's (undervolted if necessary), a seagate barracuda IV, and you are good to go. i dont see why people go to such extremes, for little to no improvement.

    1. Re:silence overrated? by packeteer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just bought one of These baybuses. They work like a charm and REALLY get things quite. They undervoltage your fans at the flick on a switch which is perfect for sleeping and when your gaming you turn the sound up and the fans on. Its very easy to setup and looks very smooth. Its very fun to show my friend my computer. It looks like im starting an airplane as i flip on rows of switches and hear the fans fire up. With over a dozen fans and multiple screamer 7200 hard drives and cd-r's it can get noisy. Yet when i want to it runs at a very quite hum in teh corner which is kinda nice when im sleeping. Also i set the last switch to control the internal lights so i dont have to use an awkward switch for the cold cathodes.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:silence overrated? by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1

      Too bad they dont make those devices that are automatic (depending on if your machine is in sleep mode or not, or temperature related, etc..)

      I know I know, they make heat sensitive fans, but they are not able to be callibrated to the temperature for your application, so useless.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    3. Re:silence overrated? by packeteer · · Score: 2

      You could attatch some logic chips to this baybus. Use the serial port to output a signal. I know you cant find software to output your temp/status out the serial port. Then depending on the signal control the fans.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    4. Re:silence overrated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just put my loud PC in the basement along with my loud Netra T1 and my loud SCSI drive case with 5 full height 9GB drives in it. :-) I don't hear anything from my bedroom anymore. Sure beats living in my old apartment when my computers were in the next bedroom over.

    5. Re:silence overrated? by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Informative

      i dont see why people go to such extremes, for little to no improvement.

      It's called the noise floor, and while it may not matter much to you in standard computing environments, it matters a lot in non-standard ones. Like if you're building a home theater PC. If your PC runs at 40 dB then forget hearing anything below that -- which can be either quiet passages in music (classical or rock - both have 'em) or downkeyed scenes in movies. Turning the volume of the system up isn't an option unless you want to constantly change the volume during a movie so you don't lose your hearing during action/climactic scenes.

      Additionally any noise like a PC can interfere with subtle nuances in music or movies, which is equally bad. With a 20 dB noise floor you may be able to hear sound queues for things you can't hear with a 40 dB noise floor.

      So it's not little to no improvement - it can be pretty substantial in the right environment. Personally I'm looking to build my next PC to be quieter, not because it's going to be a HTPC, but because I'm tired of having an absurdly loud PC. I'm not going to take it to extremes, but I will try to purchase quieter components.

    6. Re:silence overrated? by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      . It looks like im starting an airplane as i flip on rows of switches and hear the fans fire up.

      I have the same device and I love it for the same reasons you say. However, the only problem I have is the damn LED's are too bright at night. I have resorted to hanging a shirt over it to cover the lights at night. My latest thought was to find some sort of dark, translucent stickers and cover the LED's, but I don't know where to find such things.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    7. Re:silence overrated? by naarok · · Score: 1

      The noise isn't a huge problem when you've got one machine in a room. But my den now has four machines running. The noise is starting to become a real bother. Admittedly, two (maybe three) of the machine could be moved elsewhere in the house and run as headless servers, but I haven't taken the time to run cable to an appropriate place. Server rooms are even worse. Quiteing these things down would make life alot easier for those of us who sometimes admin large networks.

    8. Re:silence overrated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I am building computers that meant to be used in home recording studios. In most home studios, you don't have a lot of room and alot of people end up recording vocals and what not in the same room as the computer. Now you may not think that that computer noise is so noticable. But when you have a microphone worth a couple hundred to a couple thousand, these babies pick up every little sound in the room. Now with music you can be listening to a song and it comes to a break when no one is playing and have computer noise all over it. It just isn't exceptable. And if you try and go threw and cut out the spaces between the audio, all of a sudden the voice sounds fake, so you see the delema. Either get a quiet computer that you really don't notice, or you get a 6,000 dollar sound booth and not every one just has that kind of money, at least I don't.

    9. Re:silence overrated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bright? I want the LEDs in my case to cause a scene resembling the radiant heat part of the nuclear explosion in T2! (leaving the overpressure effects to the speakers I hope to get around to building...) If you really insist on reducing the brightness of your leds, you could just put resistors in series with the LEDs.

  7. I have to wonder...... by idiotnot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    exactly what this will do to component life. As you can see from the graphs they posted, the CPU and graphics card do run noticably hotter than with the stock cooling.

    To me, the small amount of noise created by a the stock CPU fan and graphics card cooler are worth the bit of extra noise.

    A very quiet case fan might be a good addition to this to help draw heat out of the case. That big plastic window doesn't help add anything to radiational cooling from the case, either.

    And my athlon isn't *that* noisy, especially when it's tucked away underneat the desk.

    1. Re:I have to wonder...... by Moofie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Radiant heat transfer is on the order of 10-100x less effective than convective cooling (like with a moving airflow). Radiant transfer varies as the fourth power of temperature, and does not turn significant until you get to temperatures that would a) fry any component you can name and b) give you a really good burn when you accidentally brush it with your leg.

      So the window, apart from looking stupid, doesn't really hurt anything. : ) 'Cept the faraday cage.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:I have to wonder...... by ljaguar · · Score: 1

      Or rather, to me, the no amount of noise created by having giant heatsinks on everything is worth a little underclocking. (and maybe one giant quite fan for general airflow)

      Seriously. Isn't that really what justifies having ridiculously fast CPU's? So that you can say, "yeah, but these really power hungry and hot CPU's can run really really cool and power conservatively at comparable clock speed as top of the line CPU's from last year!"?

      I thought so, but how come people rarely do so? Or never hear about anybody doing it anyways. Isn't quality of life an important thing or is "more power, ARR ARR ARR" the mantra today?

      Then again, why am I asking that to bunch of rowdy /. geeky crowd?

      (for reference, quitepc.com sells cool stuff like heatsink for motherboard, heatsink for video cards, heatsink for cpu's, quite powersupply, and HD enclosures. I could only afford a powersupply for a small file server of mine, but hey, first time I turned it on, I didn't know it was on.)

    3. Re:I have to wonder...... by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Informative
      Semiconductors aren't that sensitive to moderate heat, in the way that it would destroy them; if they get too hot, you will just have system crashes, random resets, etc. (as if that isn't bad enough).

      No, but heat kills bearings. So, the hard drive will probably be the first component to fail, especially with today's sensitive drives.

      Another mid-term problem would be the electrolytic caps. They will dry up over time, which will introduce sporadic instability/reboots at first, and you'll be driven mad searching for the cause. Almost impossible to detect without special equipment, i.e. an ESR meter.

      So, if you want a silent PC, you'd be better off buying cool components in the first place. It's just too much of a hassle (and expensive) trying to silently and reliably cool high power CPUs and graphics cards.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    4. Re:I have to wonder...... by idiotnot · · Score: 2

      I thought so, but how come people rarely do so? Or never hear about anybody doing it anyways. Isn't quality of life an important thing or is "more power, ARR ARR ARR" the mantra today?

      Then again, why am I asking that to bunch of rowdy /. geeky crowd?


      Ehh....not all of us are like that. Me, I'm more concerned with having stable hardware so that if the system crashes, I can pretty much be sure it's software (I've been messing around with the Hurd lately....).

      The Athlon, frankly, I haven't used much, seeing as how it's not at my house at the moment. I intend to use it as my everyday desktop when it's finished its role away from home.

      FWIW, my main desktop machine at home right now is a G3/350. Not exactly an ARR ARR ARR 1337 speed deamon, y'know? It is quiet, but not much more than the PIII it replaced.

    5. Re:I have to wonder...... by beowulf_26 · · Score: 1

      Another mid-term problem would be the electrolytic caps. They will dry up over time, which will introduce sporadic instability/reboots at first...

      Uh, what exactly is an "electrolytic cap"? Where is it in my computer? Purpose/Function??

      --

      --I hate big sigs.
    6. Re:I have to wonder...... by nexthec · · Score: 3, Informative

      and electrolytic cap is a capacitor constructed with an oil as the dialectric, as oppsed to paper, this allows for a much greater range of use. They can be found in your PSU, on your motherboard, and probably on your harddrive. In general Capacitors store charge, however they do much more than that, the can be used with an opamp to make filters, to do intergration/derivation and a multitude of other neat things. Take a circuits class or 4 and you learn some neat stuff

    7. Re:I have to wonder...... by beowulf_26 · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean a fancy capacitor ! Why didn't you just say so? j/k :P
      Seriously, thanks for the answer. If I had 1/2 a brain I coulda figured cap = 'capacitor'.

      --

      --I hate big sigs.
    8. Re:I have to wonder...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the dialectric is an anodic film plated onto one of the conductors, not the oil. No?

    9. Re:I have to wonder...... by hatchet · · Score: 1

      Semiconductors aren't that sensitive to moderate heat, in the way that it would destroy them; if they get too hot, you will just have system crashes, random resets, etc. (as if that isn't bad enough).

      Might be.. But:
      moderators are too sensitive to conduct heat, in way that it wouldn't destroy them; if they get too hot, you will just have karma crashes, random moderation, etc.

    10. Re:I have to wonder...... by SHiFTY1000 · · Score: 1
      Which is why you use a 120mm fan @ 5 volts as your intake, gently blowing air over your drives and mobo... Very quiet and highly effective.

      My theory is that large fans at low speed are more effective than small fans at high speed, and far quieter.

    11. Re:I have to wonder...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dialectric? As in alectricity and alectronics?

      Yaa fackang adaat.

    12. Re:I have to wonder...... by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      Because every second I have to wait for a compile to complete is a second wasted.

    13. Re:I have to wonder...... by Jouster · · Score: 2

      My personal box is an T-Bird 1.2 bought when the 1.4 had just come out, and I run it downclocked to 900 MHz, with 768 MB of PC 133 CAS3 downclocked to PC100 CAS2.

      Of course, I did this for the heat, not for the noise. It's incredible what happens to a dorm room over the course of even one night processing {d.net,UD,Prime95} WU's with the door closed.

      Jouster
      (Story Author)

    14. Re:I have to wonder...... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      Your machine will be hopelessly obsolete long before the components fail.

    15. Re:I have to wonder...... by Oms · · Score: 1

      I think what he meant was not exactly radiant transfer, but convective transfer of heat off the surface of the case. Which the stupid window does hurt, though perhaps not by much.

    16. Re:I have to wonder...... by timeOday · · Score: 2
      Ah yes, just what people said 2 1/2 years ago when I overclocked my Celeron 566 to 850 (assuming the heating issues of passive cooling are similar to those of overclocking).

      The cpu is still running fine, and a search of competed ebay auctions shows the value of the CPU is down to $15-$25.

      In other words, if the life has been shortened, who cares?

    17. Re:I have to wonder...... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but since I bothered to actually go to my Heat Transfer class, I thought I'd share my useless knowledge. : )

      Incidentally, free convection (convection in a non-moving airflow, which is likely what you have on the outside of your case) is not very effective. Apple uses a chimney effect to improve the effectiveness of their heat transfer, but that's across a finned sink. The flat outsides of your case are a) painted and b) not very warm, both of which decrease the heat transfer.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    18. Re:I have to wonder...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you read (you DID read the article, RIGHT?) that the Seagate drive used in the artlcle did not have traditional bearings, so your argument lost a little 'punch' right there.

      Party pooper.

      Next!

    19. Re:I have to wonder...... by SectoidRandom · · Score: 2

      If you have heard some of the "sock CPU fan's and graphics card coolers" out there you may change your mind.. I recently read a round-up of Geforce 4600's, the loudest ones (MSI & Leadtek i think) were close to 50db!! Think about it, your average vacuum cleaner is somewhere in the 50's! :(

      Could you seriously sleep with one of those things on? Personally I wont anymore, I have a similar rig to this one, although there are so many more things that can be done to reduce noise even further. Actually all his claims in the article about being a "silent pc" are rediculous, 40dBA is pretty noisy to me! I only wish I could measure mine, still it's too noisy for me but with only two 'silent-fans' in the whole thing it's pretty close to "silent".

  8. Quiet PC? by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, it's called putting a PC in another room and accessing it via vnc/ssh. You won't hear a thing.

    1. Re:Quiet PC? by slantyyz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Which brings up the age old question:

      If a PC screams in a room and nobody hears it, does it still make a noise?

    2. Re:Quiet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, it's called putting a PC in another room and accessing it via vnc/ssh. You won't hear a thing.
      now you see, that's where I'm a damn fool, I have my quiet running server in my basement that I access via ssh on my desktop and my desktop is roaringly loud.

      I wouldn't use VNC with it though, I'd use a real terminal program.
    3. Re:Quiet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or, just don't be a bitch and use the console.

    4. Re:Quiet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you still need something as your terminal. Second, I don't believe you will be able to run certain apps (such as games) over VNC. Also, if you go for X client/server instead VNC, you loose benefits of direct shared memory manipulation, very noticeable in apps such as GIMP.

    5. Re:Quiet PC? by buswolley · · Score: 2, Funny
      Bad Idea.

      We know, we all depend on the vast amounts of computer noise to cover our exclamations when we find some really good pr0n.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    6. Re:Quiet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Which brings up the age old question:
      >If a PC screams in a room and nobody hears it, >does it still make a noise?

      Microsofts version of this philosphical question:
      If a PC with Windows and ISS crashes in a room did i really happen and is it our fault in any way?

    7. Re:Quiet PC? by skaya · · Score: 1

      Exactly, when there's nobody to hear it, it makes no noise :-)

      I applied this simple principle for my home PC, featuring tons of hard disks, huges fans, and other spiffy gadgets ; the case is on one side of a wall, and the keyboard/mouse/screen are on the other side, with just a small hole in the wall to let the wirings go thru. It makes a really dead silent PC. OK, if I want to stick something in the CDROM drive, I have to go to the other room... But with USB2, I'll have cables long enough (and fast enough) to have external CD/DVD drives and other peripherals (printers, scanners...).

    8. Re:Quiet PC? by sirius_bbr · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, it's called putting a PC in another room and accessing it via vnc/ssh. You won't hear a thing.

      And what were you planning to use to access that pc in the other room?...

      oh wait, of course, that silent pc they're talking about :)

      --
      this sig has intentionally been left blank
    9. Re:Quiet PC? by TheEnglishPatient · · Score: 1

      vnc/ssh running on what exactly? Oh I get it you need long cables.

      N

    10. Re:Quiet PC? by Jouster · · Score: 2

      Well, I use a diskless, ROMless, fanless TexTronix X Terminal. Admittedly, it's terribly vulnerable to hacking (in fact, it's the same model Mitnick SYN-flooded when he hacked Shinomura), but if you keep it all on a separate network from your net connection, you're fine.

      And meantime, you get to learn how to configure NFS so it can load its OS on boot! Ooh, pretty!

      Jouster

    11. Re:Quiet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm never drunk enough but I've never found NFS to be pretty! Pretty flakey on linux, not much better on tru64 and security-challenged!

    12. Re:Quiet PC? by Jouster · · Score: 2

      NFS on a private network is the definition of secure. ANYTHING on a private network is.

      And I haven't experienced any "flaking", despite it being run on a RedHat 7.3 box. Have you had bad experiences you can share?

      Jouster
      (Story Author)

  9. Longevity? Hardware Burnout? by beowulf_26 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think it's great that these guys did this, and I'm quite impressed at the hardware statistics and performance for such a quiet system. Although, there is a conspicuous lack of one element from the whole article...

    Longevity.

    While I've been desperately wanting a completely quiet computer that runs decently for some time now, I don't have the money to invest in a solution that is going to last only for a year or so. I guess I wish these guys had done more extended testing of their system.

    Has any other /.er made a comparable system? How has it lasted?

    Maybe I'm just a skeptic, but an overclocked GeForce 4 Ti with no active cooling makes me anxious, and somewhat hesitant.

    --

    --I hate big sigs.
    1. Re:Longevity? Hardware Burnout? by LordSah · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My solution to making my PC quite was very simple: I built a big-ass sound-insulating box for it. The box itself is made of particle board, lined with acoustic ceiling tile and carpet. I cut fan holes in the side of my original case, and mounted three fans to blow directly onto the CPU, memory and graphic board.

      The fans on the side of my case pull in air from a 20" long carpet-lined duct--it acts a lot like a car muffler. The air moves through, but the carpet absorbs nearly all the sound (the sound needs to make two 90 degree turns to escape the air channel). There is a similar duct in the back of the case for outgoing air.

      My 'new' case has more airflow than the computer originally had, so my internal temps are only a little higher than they used to be. I built the box with a weekend and ~$25. Now I can leave my computer on all the time without making my ears ring. If you've got access to a wood shop, it's a very effective way to make a quiet PC.

    2. Re:Longevity? Hardware Burnout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The problem with that setup is the dust. Dust buildup can short out components or physically set the computer on fire. One has to be careful about carpet around computers.

    3. Re:Longevity? Hardware Burnout? by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      He did actually mention longevity in the article, maybe you should read it again.

      If you're going to keep your machine for more than 2 years, you might not want to do this kind of thing. If you're a mad component-switcher, don't worry about it.

      Or don't OC your video card, maybe buy a CPU that is a couple notches slower/cooler.

      Or, be someone hesitant :) and let someone else have the fun!

    4. Re:Longevity? Hardware Burnout? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Has any other /.er made a comparable system? How has it lasted?"

      Last May or June I invested in some good cooling equipment and reduced the sound level of my system by about 20 dB. Frankly my solution is not as elegant or inexpensive as this guy but at least the machine is more portable and you don't need access to a wood shop.

      I replaced the noisy-as-hell stock heatsink (coller master or whatnot) on my CPU with an Alpha 8045 and artic silver 3 thermal compound and then put a vantec stealth fan* on top of it. The great thing is that this HS is 80mmx80mm so you can use an 80mm fan as opposed to the standard 60mm fan. This means that it's possible to get greater airflow with lower speeds and thus lower noise.

      I also replaced my other case fans with Vantec Stealths and got some light machine oil and lubed up all the fans' bearings to eliminate any tiny fan noises.

      At an overall cost of CAD$120 or so, my box actually runs cooler than before and I don't get headaches when working.

      My one mistake was usnig a slot loading DVD drive because the slot lets noise from inside the machine get out easily.

      *Yes, I know that Panaflos are cheaper and only a tiny bit less well performing.

    5. Re:Longevity? Hardware Burnout? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but now you're crowded over into a corner of the room, on a folding chair, with your keyboard on your lap.

      Nice that you're able to get your monitor on that big hulking flakewood cube, tho.

    6. Re:Longevity? Hardware Burnout? by LordSah · · Score: 2

      The box is maybe 24" wide, and 36" deep. It fits under one side of my desk fine. I work just like I did before, but now in silence.

  10. Most Apple products have been silent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most Apple products have been silent.

    Its one of the main reasons people like to buy them.

    Even some of the G4s (cube) keep the fan off unless critical.

    powerbooks are similarlysilent unless emergency fans kick in.

    The balance of other modesl, such as imac are designed with columnar "chimney effect" air flow out the tops.

    And many famous apples have no fan at all whatsoever, not even on powersupply : Apple II, IIe, IIc, IIgs

    Many musicians like the newer macs with sampler gear because they don't have to worry about systyem sound so much.

    External D/A in usb allows noise free amplification far from motherboard on most all mac models in last 3.5 years.

    Mac lovers hate noise it sems.

    I wish dual cpu AMDs could be made much quieter.

    1. Re:Most Apple products have been silent. by ericdano · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My G4 Cube is great. It is silent except for a very very slight hard drive head noise. I installed a 120 Gig hard drive for use in recording. My mics never pick up computer noise. They sometimes get the AC when it's on.

      The new iMacs (those lamp ones) are practically silent. Even some of the old iMacs are real quiet.

      This article was great! I'm considering upgrading my PC at home (loud 600Mhz Pentium III), and this would be something to look into!

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:Most Apple products have been silent. by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      I'm sitting here reading this on a TiBook.....I can *just about* here the hard drive heads move....

      However, if boot up Warcraft III the fan does kick in.....but it's a hell of a lot quieter than most systems still. Much quieter than my Sony laptop.

      -psyco

    3. Re:Most Apple products have been silent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The newer G4 towers howl! Mine makes as much noise as my dual A. The first time I noticed it I thought one of the many fans in the Dual A was dodgy (or something), so I turned it off. It was then I realised how loud the new single 800Mhz G4 was... very! Just as loud as the Dual A with it's 7 fans.

    4. Re:Most Apple products have been silent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PowerBook G3 walstreet 300 is silent and fan only comes on whan it starts to overheat.

      heat radiates through keyboard and bottom.

      Some powerbooks are silent most of the time.

    5. Re:Most Apple products have been silent. by TheEnglishPatient · · Score: 1

      My G3 Imac is virtually silent EXCEPT the 30Gb hard drive is quite noisy. In the otherwise silent room where I work, it is a bit like water torture to hear it whirring way for hours on end. (It won't sleep because it's checking for email every ten mins or so)

      N

    6. Re:Most Apple products have been silent. by tbmaddux · · Score: 2
      Even some of the G4s (cube) keep the fan off unless critical.
      A nitpick: G4 Cube has no fan, although you can add an 80mm fan to it very easily. Mount points for the fan are already there, and the fan will blow air out the cube's "chimmney."

      Most of the fan noise in the DP QS 2002 machine is in the power supply. This also appears to be true for the MDD PowerMac G4s, although their main fan is variable-speed and can get loud, like the PowerBook G4's CPU fan.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    7. Re:Most Apple products have been silent. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      All of the Macintosh II products (II, IIc, IIcx, IIci, IIfx) have a noisy-ass fan in their power supply. I still have a IIci, I put netbsd on it and then stopped doing anything with it. Still, it works okay, if slow. It's still faster than my first dedicated Unix system, a Sun 3/260 (25mhz 68020 rather than the IIci's 25mhz 68030).

      USB is fine for non-realtime work but not so hot for any kind of realtime anything. Of course, most sound cards are crap for realtime anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Most Apple products have been silent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish this was 100% True. I love Macs and will say most of them are quiet. However I have a test mule 867mhz G4 and it is loud as all hell, also has a jet of hot air out of the back. By far the hottest loudest G4 system i have.

      500mhz G4 - quiet very
      450mhz DP G4 - quiet very
      500mhz DP G4 - quiet very
      867mhz G4 - loud very

      Now as I said it is an Apple test mule ( Quicksilver demo board in a Sawtooth Case ) and this may be for this reason that it is so loud. It also uses a lot more power, the bars on my UPS go up 3 notches when it is on. Just so you know, unfortunately not all Apples are as quiet as one would like.

      I know this is a little off topic ... sorry

  11. Re:A great accomplishment by morph3ous · · Score: 0

    That's a good point. I guess I meant the more common place machines.

  12. I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Navaash+Fenwylde · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Those are some gigantic heatsinks. The processor heatsink alone is frigheting enough. But there does seem to be one solution that can be even quieter and can cool both Pentiums AND Athlons...

    Water cooling!

    It's certainly different, using water to carry off and circulate the heat. Obviously, it requires a large degree of trust, as one leak can short out your entire system in a heartbeat. I've been around these beasts, and they certainly seem quiet enough.

    I imagine they would be great for overclockers :D

    1. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by XaXXon · · Score: 2

      Those are some gigantic heatsinks. The processor heatsink alone is frigheting enough. But there does seem to be one solution that can be even quieter and can cool both Pentiums AND Athlons...

      Uhh... it's a passive heatsink. It's a piece of metal that sits there. Tough to get much cooler..

    2. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

      I have to wonder whether there are any liquids around that will cool a system without short-circuiting it if it spills out?

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    3. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Shelled · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Those are some gigantic heatsinks.

      Gigantic, yes. Massive, no. Those large, very thin copper sheets appear to lack the mass required to move much heat.

    4. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have a non-overclocked Athlon 2000+ system here, set up with water cooling (CPU temperature ranges from 56 to 65 C). The water pump is advertised to run at 9 dB. You can hear it buzzing only in absolute silence. The only fan is in the PSU and this one really produces noise, despite being a low-speed fan. I'd be curious to compare my dB level against the 40 mentioned in the article, but alas I have no meter. Anyway, the PC is quieter than any other I have heard so far. The article has led me to believe that the PSU has ample room for improvement, though.

    5. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Moofie · · Score: 5, Informative

      No.

      Heat exchangers want to maximize surface area, not mass. You are trying to present the maximum surface to the surrounding airflow, cooling by convection. More mass would simply be a thermal battery, storing heat on the processor. The thin heat sink fins actually remove heat from the processor by transferring it to the surrounding air.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to have one of those koolance water cooled cases. My koolance isnt more silent than a normal PC that uses low noise fans.

      It was fun to fill the koolance with water and all, but thats what it is, a toy and nothing more. Do not buy it if you're seeking a silent PC.

    7. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you were out of luck there, and it's not generally true. The cooling system I mentioned above DOES eliminate the CPU fan noise and case fans noise completely.

    8. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by divide+overflow · · Score: 2, Interesting


      >I have to wonder whether there are any liquids around that will cool a system without short-circuiting it if it spills out?

      How about a refrigerant like R134A? It it commonly used in air conditioners and refrigerators. Of course they are using it as part of a phase change refrigeration system.

    9. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by ColaMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      R134A is good except that it boils at -30 deg C, and its pressure to stay liquid at room / processor temp is about 70psi. It won't short your board out if it leaks, but the frost that'll be generated if you get leak liquid R134A out will.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    10. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by falzer · · Score: 1

      Oil, alcohol.

    11. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's one more aspect to that. When you have very thin, long fins, like the Zalman heatsinks do, the thermal conductivity is too low for the heat to be transfered all the way to the tips. From what I can see on the photos, these heatsinks are not as efficient as they could be. IMHO the optimal heatsink would have a tree-like structure, whith thick 'stems' conducting the heat to many thin, but reasonably short 'leaves'. The Arkua coolers seem to somewhat follow this approach.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    12. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 2

      Or this Calm PC

      Doesn't support the fastest CPU's but it's as silent as silence gets.

      I've been running it for a while now and I love it.

    13. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

      We rule that out, then. I don't want my computer to short out if I lose power. How about the oil the other guy mentioned? Do we have oil with the right viscosity? Alcohol boils at 60-70C. That's too low, in my estimation.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    14. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by RebRachman · · Score: 1

      I can think of another.
      http://www.activecool.com.

      From what I've seen, their solid-state cooling system actually works. Not silent, but it measures temperature and includes a controller which runs the fan at variable speed as needed. Their first production run is in January.

    15. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      You guys should read this: Mission Submersible. They've found an inert liquid and are submersing the whole mainboard in it, cooled with liquid nitrogen.

    16. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by jafuser · · Score: 2

      What would be really great is a water cooling system *bus* which connects water cooling from several PCs all to a line that runs outdoors or somewhere where my A/C isn't going to run all the time due to all of the computers. Has anyone heard of a complex system like this?

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    17. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Shelled · · Score: 2

      You need mass and surface area to carry heat away from the processor die.

    18. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But there does seem to be one solution that can be even quieter and can cool both Pentiums AND Athlons... Water cooling! [koolance.com]

      Oh really? Please inform the rest of us as to how you cool off the water that's circulating through the system? I assume you're using a closed system?

    19. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by timeOday · · Score: 2

      Distilled water?

    20. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Moofie · · Score: 2

      Well, if you can invent a massless heat sink, you can sell me the patent and I'll buy you lunch forever. Promise. Won't be a very good heat sink, but I bet I can find some other uses for it.

      OF COURSE you need mass. But the MASS doesn't MOVE the heat. It only STORES it. The reason to use copper is because it has excellent thermal conduction properties, moving the heat away from the processor towards the fins. Just having a big ol' block o' copper at the bottom of the heat sink isn't going to improve its effectiveness.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    21. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by ari_j · · Score: 2

      Artificial blood, circa 50 years ago. Although the fluid, designed primarily for military use, proved ineffective as a blood substitute, Cray found that it was very conductive of heat but not conductive of electricity, and used it to cool the early liquid-cooled Cray computers. But you'll wanna try freon, or something.

    22. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by InnovATIONS · · Score: 2

      I have been looking at watercooling designs, particularly one that could be used to move the heat outside of the house since my home office has TWO P4 noise/heat makers in it. Two questions I hoped that someone could answer are. 1. Is there a practical way of water-cooling the PSU? 2. has anybody considered placing the hard disk inside some sort of water jacket? I am envisioning some sort of double-walled polybag that the drive would slide into, much like is often done for shipping now.

    23. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by edunbar93 · · Score: 2

      Replace the water with a non-conducting oil (and most are) and Ta-da, your faith in water retention need not exist. One lunatic even submerged his entire kit in castor oil, which just goes to prove that it won't roast everything. :)

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    24. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You're right, and if my heat transfer book was close to hand I could tell you what the optimum aspect ratio is for a given ambient temp and processor temp. However, I know that copper is a very good heat conductor and the fins weren't all THAT catastrophically thin, so I believe that the heat sink will be pretty effective.

      And, according to the tests, Zalman knows what they're doing. Proof's in the pudding.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    25. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

      The two of you breach an interesting point. I am curious as to what you mean by aspect ratio. Here's my guess: Given a "one-fin" conically shaped heat sink, what is the optimum height for a particular heat sink mass and bottom surface area? Presumably, the sides would end up curved in some way.

    26. Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Aye, you're right. In practice, it's easier to machine rectangular cross sections, but a cone with a curved surface would be optimal. When you design a heat sink, you apply boundary condition assumptions to your problem, which drive the aspect ratio and separation distance and such.

      One way to get really good heat transfer with reasonably easy fabrication is to use an array of cylindrical pins. That gives you the largest surface area density (that is, surface area of pins vs. surface area of base) for a given separation distance between pins (which you can optimize depending on what the airflow in the region looks like).

      Heat sink design is interesting, but usually it becomes easier to just make it a little bigger and not spend the time (and money!) to get it super-optimized.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  13. Old news by Maniakes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The PowerMac G4 cube (bottom of page 4, "Noise characteristics") was only 31 dB. That's 2,512 times quiter than this "silent" PC.

    --
    A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    1. Re:Old news by ericdano · · Score: 2

      Yes, the Cube is a great machine. I'm curious as to what the noise level is if you install a 1 Ghz G4 via Sonnet or Powerlogix. I hear those require a fan :-(

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:Old news by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm having trouble with the math -- i know that it's a log scale, so:

      10^3.1 = 1,258

      10^4.0 = 10,000

      10,000 / 1258 = 7.94, not 2512.

      Am i doing something wrong?

    3. Re:Old news by marauder404 · · Score: 5, Informative

      2,512 times quieter than the 65 dB machine:

      10^3.1 = 1,259
      10^6.5 = 3,162,277

      3,162,277 / 1,259 = 2,512

    4. Re:Old news by Maniakes · · Score: 2

      My mistake. I was thinking 65 dB was the quiet PC, and the standard was 80. Teach me to rely on my short term memory. Your math looks right to me.

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    5. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well my computer is 0 dB which is infinitely quieter.

      Of course it has a few fans that kick in when I do something intensive...like turn it on

    6. Re:Old news by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1

      Since you don't know how far away Apple measured their G4 Cube, these 2 dB readings cannot be compared. This article doesn't use a quiet room to measure the sound levels, so his readings are somewhat innacurate, and entirely inconsistant with Apple's measurements.

      Also, the cube with the quality video card has a fan that is louder than this entire machine.

      On top of that, the cube had stability problems and overheated.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    7. Re:Old news by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "The PowerMac G4 cube [apple.com] (bottom of page 4, "Noise characteristics") was only 31 dB. That's 2,512 times quiter than this "silent" PC."

      Check your math. 31db not even 1/10th as loud to human ears than 40 db. (But still it is quieter.)

    8. Re:Old news by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Check your math. 31db not even 1/10th as loud to human ears than 40 db. (But still it is quieter.)"

      Sorry, I didn't realise that you were comparing it to the 65 dB as opposed to the 40dB.

  14. 67C? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That seems a little high for a CPU temp, Ive always heard that you wanna keep it under 60C at worst, usually under 50C though.

    Of course, you can probably drop the temps by lowering the voltage to the CPU and underclocking it.

    1. Re:67C? by Seehund · · Score: 1

      Well, that would of course depend on the type of CPU.

      The P4 @ 2.8 GHz in the PC in the article should be OK up to 75C, according to Intel.

      I've got a dual Athlon MP 1900+ (i.e. 1660 MHz) box, slightly overclocked to 1740 MHz. Under full CPU load (which is 24/7 thanks to distributed.net) CPU0 temperature is around 50C, and 60C for CPU1 (which I think is weird. CPU1 is close to the graphics card, but I still wouldn't think that this would account for a 10 degree difference.) This is with active air cooling using a couple of WhisperRock II HSFs and Arctic Silver 3 "thermal goo".
      Anyway, AMD says I'll be fine as long as I stay below 95C! There's a setting in my BIOS that will that shutdown the system if the temp hits a user defined value (80C here), detected by the on-die sensors of the CPUs. I suppose it's the same with the CPU and mobo in the article.

      I'd be more worried about the temp of his graphics card. Personally I think I'd keep a quiet fan on the GPU, especially if it's overclocked. In my experience it's the case fans, sucking air in and blowing it out of the case through grilles, cables and plastic decorations that are the noisiest. Get some quiet case fans, or remove them like in this... case... and use some sort of insulation in the box to keep the noise of the internal stuff to a minimum.

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  15. Great news for Beowulf clustering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to my calculations, you can now cluster 100,000,000 PCs before their combined noise level reaches the threshold of pain!

    1. Re:Great news for Beowulf clustering by Seehund · · Score: 1

      :D

      A not only funny, but also an interesting and on-topic Beowulf cluster post!

      It begs a question to those who haven't forgotten all their high-school physics like me:

      How does loudness / sound volume scale with the number of sound generators, i.e. how much louder are 10 PCs together, compared to one PC?

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    2. Re:Great news for Beowulf clustering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can you tell me how big an area you could heat with them?

    3. Re:Great news for Beowulf clustering by edunbar93 · · Score: 2

      Heh. You can fix that problem entirely by removing *all* the fans and just rack-mounting the suckers without cases inside a freezer. Preferably a meat locker around 200 sq ft. Then all your cooling needs are met with one unit. :)

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  16. Confusing headline... by Angron · · Score: 4, Funny

    My first thought was "Isn't a dead computer already silent?"

    -A

    1. Re:Confusing headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My first thought was "Isn't a dead computer already silent?"

      In silent nights you can hear them scream.
    2. Re:Confusing headline... by Drunken+Buddhist · · Score: 1

      In cyberspace, no one can hear you scream.

      --
      -1, Disagree is not a valid option. Troll, Flamebait and Offtopic are not a substitute.
    3. Re:Confusing headline... by valmont · · Score: 5, Funny
      [haleyjoel]

      *clinching blanket and pulling it towards face*
      "I can hear dead boxen".

      [/haleyjoel]

    4. Re:Confusing headline... by buswolley · · Score: 1
      what a bunch of mumbo-jumbo. Makes no sense. Of course they can ,if proper equipmentand software is installed.

      And, Oh My, I hate the term CyberSpace.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    5. Re:Confusing headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boxes, not boxen...

      When will /.'ers will ever learn...

    6. Re:Confusing headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normality, not normalcy...

      When will you Yanks ever learn...

  17. I don't buy that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The scale is logarithmic because *hearing* is logarithmic. This '20x quieter' has more to do with sound pressure than what a human being would say.

  18. Already been done by cscx · · Score: 4, Funny

    See here -- it's GOT to be silent.

    Also, ever hear of that new lampy thing called an 'iMac'?? Yeah, they're silent.

    1. Re:Already been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the hard drive and cdrom still make the odd noise or three.

    2. Re:Already been done by Jouster · · Score: 2

      iMacs, the old ones without fans, are no longer in production. I'm not sure if iLamps have fans or not. In either... case..., they don't have OC'd video cards and are much more expensive than the solution in this story.

      Your link was previously featured on /., but, IIRC, it runs at 200 MHz--hardly the kind of speed you'd get when ordering a brand-new Dell.

      My story, on the other hand, highlights the possibilities for extensive, passive cooling in a modern machine (in fact, its specs are well above those of the two-month-old Dell on which I am typing this).

      The reason the story is impressive is that he managed to take a machine that any of us would be proud to have next to our desks, and reduce it to ONE FAN. Putting tons of foam around an MMX/200 doesn't exactly compare.

      Jouster

    3. Re:Already been done by cscx · · Score: 2

      Dude, chill, I was just adding a little spice to the conversation! =)

  19. Google Cache by babycakes · · Score: 3, Informative
  20. They'd better start building more overclocked ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... for their webserver. It's being slashdotted into oblivion as I write this...

  21. Noise Cancelling Case by peel · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It seems to me that someone would have come up with a noise cancelling method by now. You know, something similar to the technology utilized by some headphones such as these by Aiwa. Basically you could sample the sound inside the case then invert the wave, and then play it back through a case speaker. Viola! Instant nose reduction. This would also dynamically address other noisy things such as cd-rom drives. Just an idea to make millions. -peel

    p.s.- If you don't understand how this works you can also try it out with your home stereo and a song with a lot of base. Take your speakers and aim them at each other then take one of the sets of wires and switch the positive and the negative. You will notice the sound of the bass reduces dramatically due to an effect called phasing.

    1. Re:Noise Cancelling Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know if that would work well, I think that noise cancelling headphones are effective because of their close proximity to your ears. I don't think you would be able to get the speaker in the case so that it would be out of phase in all places in and around the case because there are some tricky acoustic things going on. Although, it would still be kind of cool because as you moved around the case you would be able to hear the case sound go in and out of phase!

    2. Re:Noise Cancelling Case by Fourier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, general noise cancellation in three dimensions is a much more difficult problem than noise cancellation at a point or two (e.g. headphones).

    3. Re:Noise Cancelling Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, the effect is called destructive interference, not phasing, but we get the idea. Plus, it seems like it would be simpler to design components that don't make as much noise and/or find ways to absorb the sound.

      Another fairly obvious thing would be to mechanically isolate the noisy vibrating bits (like hard drives or CD-ROM drives) so they aren't coupled to big, flat, non-rigid surfaces (like panels of the case or maybe even the motherboard itself). Most stringed musical instruments have a big not-completely-rigid piece of wood, and its purpose is to provide extra surface area to push around air and thus make the sound louder. That's great for music instruments, but it's not good for a computer case.

      If the two big panels of the case are actually acting as sound boards, there is a pretty easy fix: hook up a wire or something between them and put it under lots of tension to prevent them from vibrating. Unfortunately, this would require putting a hole in the middle of the motherboard...

    4. Re:Noise Cancelling Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Viola? I wouldn't want to hear one of those through my case speaker!

    5. Re:Noise Cancelling Case by alistair · · Score: 3, Funny

      "you can also try it out with your home stereo and a song with a lot of base. Take your speakers and aim them at each other then take one of the sets of wires and switch the positive and the negative. You will notice the sound of the bass reduces dramatically due to an effect called phasing"

      Actually many years ago I did try reversing speaker wires at a party and did notice a reduction of around 50% in the base due to an effect called "blowing up your speaker".

      I can't say for certain this was simply due to reversing the speaker leads, I was using far more powerful amps than the speakers were rated for but this is one experiment I won't be rushing to try at home.

    6. Re:Noise Cancelling Case by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      I can't say for certain this was simply due to reversing the speaker leads, I was using far more powerful amps than the speakers were rated for but this is one experiment I won't be rushing to try at home.

      There is an easier way to test this out. Just play a DVD that has the THX setup clips on it. It plays white noise samples that are in phase and then out of phase. Off the top of my head, Phantom Menace and T2 both have it.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
  22. Re:A great accomplishment by strictnein · · Score: 3, Funny

    my commodore 64 is so silent is actually creates a quiet hole

    this is similar to a black hole, except for that it absorbs all sound, instead of light, and no sound can escape from it. It's very scary really and it's truly something that must be heard to be seen... or something... uhmm... yes

  23. If a computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... cruches numbers and nobody hears it does it really make a sound? I don't know, go ask that tree who seems pretty silent too!

    1. Re:If a computer... by waferbuster · · Score: 1

      In space... no-one can hear your hard-drive scream.

      --
      I'm an individual! Just like everyone else!
  24. So what? by jpmorgan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So some guys with a website bought a bunch of large heatsinks from other companies, built a computer that uses almost entirely passive computing and we're expected to do what? Commend them on their innovative use of a credit card? ;)

    And it's not like super-quiet computers haven't been done before. Yawn. Boring.

    1. Re:So what? by Jouster · · Score: 2

      If this is your position on such issues, I suppose you don't care about the latest ASCI supercomputer--I mean, nothing new is happening, people are just spending money.

      Personally, I think the ability to simulate a cubic foot of reality in real time at the subatomic level is pretty impressive. And I think the ability to run UT 2003 with only one fan is pretty impressive, too.

      Jouster
      (Story Author)

  25. Standard Issue by BoBaBrain · · Score: 5, Funny

    My PC has a button on the front that eliminates noise completely. It eliminates those annoying lights on the case too...

    --
    I am a Karma Library.
    1. Re:Standard Issue by buswolley · · Score: 1
      Comp: No!!!

      Don't do it!!

      Don't you realize that after you've spent 10,000 hours listening to me, that you'll miss me?

      We are good friends you and I.

      You and I are one.Deep in your phsychee.. Don't youll go mad..

      ok this is lame

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    2. Re:Standard Issue by KH · · Score: 1

      Your comment is certainly fanny, but I think you have a point.

      There is a reason why I have problems buying a PC laptop, as opposite to buying a Mac laptop (in addition to the noise, and MS OS).

      That's those annoying LEDs. My iBook has hardly any LEDs, except for the white breathing sleep indicator, which is completely invisible while the machine is awake.

      I just don't understand why there are so many LEDs on PC laptops (three at least?). Don't people get distracted by those blinking lights? Those are totally aesthetically unpleasing.

    3. Re:Standard Issue by BoBaBrain · · Score: 2

      I have to agree. What really gets me though are LCDs on laptops. Pointless.
      <br>
      <br>
      Unfortunately I'm not a mac user myself, but I have to admire their case design.

      --
      I am a Karma Library.
    4. Re:Standard Issue by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 2
      Your comment is certainly fanny,

      Freudian slap?

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    5. Re:Standard Issue by mgblst · · Score: 2

      I suggest you use it next time you decide to post.

      It will eliminate annoying posts as well!!

    6. Re:Standard Issue by BoBaBrain · · Score: 2

      If we don't provide "annoying posts", who will?

      --
      I am a Karma Library.
    7. Re:Standard Issue by KH · · Score: 1

      It's a bit late, but I will have to admit--yes :)

  26. Some PCs are quiet anyway by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the process of building a PC-based PVR I was worried that the noise of a PC might be distracting when placed next to a TV set in the family room.

    I needn't have worried. The PC I'm using is a 1.8GHz P4 with a 7200 RPM Seagate HD, Sony CDR/RW and DVD drives plus a top-spec video card.

    The noise of the hard drive seeking when doing time-shift is about the only barely audible sound -- and you can only hear that if you mute the TV.

    Some PCs are just very quiet anyway.

    In my office I have two tower systems and two mini-tower systems with a total of 8HDs, 4 PSUs and 4 video cards. Once again, the loudest noise used to be the clicking of my IBM Deskstar drive until it died (yeah, mine too) and now there's just a very gentle white noise from the air being blown around by all those fans. It's certainly not noisy.

    Just choosing your hardware properly will likely negate any need to take special care to cut noise levels.

  27. obligatory post by valmont · · Score: 4, Funny


    imagine a paradoxally silently humming, mysteriously stealth, decibel absorbing, reality distorting beowulf cluster of those.

    1. Re:obligatory post by fritter · · Score: 2

      "Look how well it renders the steam coming off of those grits!"

    2. Re:obligatory post by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I had a bowl of grits yesterday.

      Incidentally, if you go to 'Waffle and Steak' in Indiana, you can order the 'One Egg' off the menu, for $1.65. With it comes jam and toast and a bowl of grits. It's one hell of a good deal, considering that if you order a bowl of grits alone it costs $1.25.

  28. Re:heating up by phalse+phace · · Score: 1
    Maybe I should actually click on the link and read the write up...

    Eh, couldn't hurt.

  29. Totally silent PC by shepd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even more quiet than some Macs.

    Buy a mobo with a VIA CPU on it. Take off 486 CPU Fan/HS combo. Replace with a large heatsink. Build/buy P/S with no fan (VIA CPUs take very little power, so building one is not hard for someone with some electronics knowledge). Load up O/S through the network, put in a lot of RAM, no hard drive.

    There. Totally silent PC. And it probably only cost you $200 CDN. Wow. Hard to believe, huh?

    Even VIA themselves know their CPU rules for this. Stop using Intel/AMD if you want quiet and lower power, with enough horses to power most modern OSes.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:Totally silent PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh... I did exactly that.

      VIA C3 CPU
      Mini-ITX motherboard
      256MB Dimm

      Network booting
      Fanless power supply...

      Works a treat :) Plays DivX on my TV for me :)

  30. Quiet? by e8johan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I used to work for having a silent computer but now I've put away the computer in a closet, done some cabeling and I don't have to worry. (The closet is quite big, and chilly since it is on an outside wall that is badly insulated). Actually, clothes also dampen sound really well...

    1. Re:Quiet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that's why my computers have been so noisy lately!

      Has OSHA, the EPA, or any similar agency done any work in this field? Just imagine - computers, cars, microwaves, industrial mahines, and even vibrators would be significantly quieter if only people would stop using them while naked.

      Even with only the pair of socks I just put on, I already notice a huge difference. I can't even fathom what sort of improvement might be made by wearing pants.

  31. totally silent hard drives by nounderscores · · Score: 2, Interesting

    forget rotating disk drives. Get a mobo with RAID and a bunch of totally solid state flash hard drives. they're electrically identical to laptop hard drives, so a $25 adaptor will allow them to be used in place of any old IDE hard drive in your RAID, but you'll have to change the "I" in the acronym from "Inexpensive" to "Independent", if you know what I mean.

    On the other hand if you think about the performance you'd get from the right kind of RAID where the individual "disks" have specs like these... suddenly everything else seems small.

  32. Cool... by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

    This one goes to -11.

    1. Re:Cool... by Jouster · · Score: 2

      I don't get it.

      Jouster

    2. Re:Cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you aren't joking, it refers to a scene from "This is Spinal Tap". An airhead rockstar was explaining how his amplifier was better than others because the volume control went past 10, to e-lev-en.

    3. Re:Cool... by Jouster · · Score: 2

      Nope, wasn't joking. Thanks for clearing it up.

      Jouster

  33. Sympathetic to their Cause by tchueh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After sitting next to my computer for the past couple years, I almost believe that the noise coming from it has seriously hindered my hearing. It's hard for me to hear people whispering to me, and sometimes I can't even hear my profs in lectures.

    This is one of the main reasons that I'll look toward a "silent" pc with decent performance, rather than a "Tweaked out" pc that'll make me deaf before I'm 30.

    I gotta hand it to the guys at Hardcoreware.net. They went all the way with this, which is something i'd like to do...

    Well, either that or just buy a Mac.

    1. Re:Sympathetic to their Cause by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Funny
      After sitting next to my computer for the past couple years, I almost believe that the noise coming from it has seriously hindered my hearing. It's hard for me to hear people whispering to me, and sometimes I can't even hear my profs in lectures.

      Thats all huh, I had the cops coming coz neighbors though i was digging up for oil everytime I put in the CD

      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    2. Re:Sympathetic to their Cause by ColaMan · · Score: 2

      85dB for 8 hours is the current occupational health and safety limit in Australia - any more than that and you risk hearing damage.

      If your computer is 85dB or louder, you would most certainly have noticed it by now. For example :

      With my noisemeter on in my loungeroom with the TV going at a 'normal' volume , it's 72dB.
      In the car , stereo up loud , it's about 90-95dB
      At work, around some operating crushers (loud enough to make you go "ow!" and out fingers in ears) it's around 105-110 dB.

      It only takes a few hours of 90+ dB noise/music to damage your hearing permanently (or at least 'stun' it for a few days afterwards)

      Think about it when you've got the headphones on and up LOUD.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    3. Re:Sympathetic to their Cause by tchueh · · Score: 1

      It's hard for me to approximate the actual dB coming from my system since i don't have any tools, and I'm not sure how accurate it would be even if I compared it to the 72dB "normal" tv volume.

      The noise isn't quite the "jet engine" noise of a bad cd-rom drive, but more like a vacuum cleaner. It's the High pitch that really gets to people.

      course I'm used to it.

  34. I wonder..... by tanveer1979 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do they need to go to such extremes, my PC can go down to 0dB.. all I have to do is push the power button ;-)

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:I wonder..... by xercist · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, dB is a logarithmic scale, so 0dB is not actually *zero* like you assume, as 10^0 == 1. You could have something that was at -1dB which would be quieter than that. On this scale, "complete silence" really doesn't exist. It all depends on how sensitive your measuring device is.

      --

      --
      grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
    2. Re:I wonder..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why most audio mixing consoles label silence as negative infinity DB.

    3. Re:I wonder..... by prator · · Score: 1

      Anyway, the auxiliary voltage supply is still on in any modern PC with an ATX supply when the power is "off". I guess the fact that some components are operational causes some level on noise.

      -prator

  35. deciBells by cosyne · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure where this 20x quieter thing comes from, but generally. a 10dB increase in sound output is considered "twice as loud." Note that a 3dB increase is twice as much energy (well, 3.0something, but close enough). Similarly, -3dB is the "half power point."

    1. Re:deciBells by Maniakes · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm not sure where this 20x quieter thing comes from, but generally. a 10dB increase in sound output is considered "twice as loud." Note that a 3dB increase is twice as much energy (well, 3.0something, but close enough). Similarly, -3dB is the "half power point."

      Your physics teacher will tell you that 10 dB is a 10x difference in the intensity of a sound wave.

      Your psychology teacher, or your friendly local audiophile, will tell you that a 10x difference in wave intensity is only a 2x difference in perceived loudness.

      Most slashdotters, geeks that we are, payed more attention in our physics classes. As a result, I forgot about the perception issue until just now.

      I am currently listening to 128 kbps mp3s on a $25 pair of headphones. Whether or not I am an audiophile is left as a exercise to the reader.

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    2. Re:deciBells by Jouster · · Score: 2

      The 20x came from a mixing of the "+10 dB = twice as loud to the ear" and "+10 dB = twice the pressure".

      It was late. Sorry.

      I meant to say, "over 100 times quieter" (since that sounds more impressive), but I can't even get get away with that. :^P Ah well.

      Jouster

  36. Dead silent PC my ass by ottffssent · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Slashdot has been having some issues with headlines recently. Maybe, just maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, but to me dead silent means as silent as a dead person. What this means is the computer has no moving parts (like a dead person). No CDROM. No PSU fan. No hard drive, no vidcard fan, no CPU fan, no case fan, no chipset fan. It netboots and loads the OS into RAM and accesses files over .

    Dead people don't move! Dead silent PCs shouldn't either.

  37. Silent PC? by cosyne · · Score: 4, Funny

    So it can't scream in pain when it gets /.ed?

    1. Re:Silent PC? by danro · · Score: 1

      Yeah.
      It has no mouth, and it must scream...

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  38. Closet PC... by rsborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A friend of mine had a great idea... which I eventually used... a closet PC.

    For those of you with the advantage of having a closet in your room (ie, not living in a college dorm), just putting a door (sliding or closing) between yourself and your beast can probably reduce your PC to fanless levels (I barely hear my monitor more than my PC in da closet).

    My PC: Athlon 900 w/stock fan, 4x80GB IDE drives, geforce2mx video, 300W PS + LOTS of fans

    Challenges:
    1) ACPI on my mobo sucks, and I can't resume with my wireless keyboard as easy as I'd like to
    2) CDRW/DVD drives are still on the unit; I'd like to replace them with firewire/usb2 external devices, but haven't had the cash to do it.

    Im interested in knowing if anyone else has opted for this low-tech, low-noise solution?

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:Closet PC... by larien · · Score: 2

      Which is fine, if you can keep enough airflow in the closet. If you can't, you'll just keep generating heat in that closet and it'll start to overheat.

    2. Re:Closet PC... by CvD · · Score: 2

      What the heck do you need 4x80 GBs for??? Can anyone collect that much pr0n?

    3. Re:Closet PC... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      You can never have enough disk space for editing video.

  39. Re:Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, yeah. You need to ignore 1 in that statement as well.

  40. i couldn't do that for my system by Critical_ · · Score: 2

    i am running an aging dual p3-500 (slot 1) system. while it may not have the sheer processing power as the newest high end chips, the disk system employs 10k rpm ultra2 drives. The system is LOUD in its full tower case. there are two problems with it...

    1) power supply fan is very loud

    2) the hard drives sit in fan-lined carts for easy removal. so not only do i hear the high pitched noise of the disks spinning but the fans cooling them.

    I have tried pulling the fans off those 10k drives and i started hearing weird noises from the drives. My conclusion? i need fans on them period.

    maybe there is a better way to cool them, any ideas would be nice. (and no pulling them out of the system is not an option)

    1. Re:i couldn't do that for my system by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Look into the 7volt solution: Google is your friend.

      For the record, I replaced the 60mm fan on my 1GHz Duron heatsink with a 80mm case fan, runnning at 7 volts. I also moved the front case fan to the size of the case and lined the inside of the case with foam. When I come into the room, the only indication I have of the machine being on is the screen.
      The computer contains two disks, two CDRWs and a 7-volted Geforce2GTS.

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
  41. Misguiding headline by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 3, Funny

    After reading the headline, I thought "cool, another one of those 'some guy blasted a PC into oblivion' page with pictures of bullets puncturing the case". Well, served as an incenting to read up the article...

  42. Re:20 times quieter? no way, lunkhead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple math is that it is 1/20th as loud. Saying it is 20x quieter is not simple math. It is crack-smoking math.

  43. Never Intefere by buswolley · · Score: 2, Funny
    The whir of my computer never inteferes with my very important work at Slashdot.

    What do I do? I am the Mayor, of Course.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  44. Times Change... by Knoxvill3 · · Score: 1

    I remember when, back in the day, people wanted a computer that was bad enough to dim the lights of a home, and was loud enough to let everyone know that they were processing something. Now a days, and I think it's due to our old age, we want our machines quiet....Let me say it now, getting old sucks.

    --
    ======
    Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. - Euripides
  45. Noisy PC's diminishing potential of Slashdot? by buswolley · · Score: 1
    I see that our noisy computers are once again intefering with quality posts on slashdot.

    I swear I was going to say something intelligent, but the fan noise drowned me out!!

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    1. Re:Noisy PC's diminishing potential of Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon?! PARDON?!!

      I'm really - I say, I'M REALLY - <sigh> starting to reconsider the merit of water cooling, or a fridge or something. My Athlon XP 2200+ (the only model of AMD Thoroughbred A, and the first with the temperature sensor on-die) runs moderately hot (56 degrees Celcius at this exact moment) and the system temp is a nice 20 degrees C, but the case really is rather louder than the average box.

      I want my next PC to be a totally or near totally silent, moderately high performance, high storage (1 terabyte or so), high memory box (silent because it'll be running all the time, as a server, in my room).

      The high storage/low noise thing is proving to be a little difficult. Any ideas? (And no, I can't store it anywhere else.)

  46. Re:Missing the point by pangloss · · Score: 1

    You can't be x times quieter than something. Its not possible. You can be x times louder, but not quieter.

    i don't get it. given:
    "A is x times louder than B"
    why would it be incorrect to claim: B is x times quieter than A?

    or, why is this case any different from A > B B A?

  47. Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by Brother52 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    CPUs and cases without fans are not very rare among brandname boxes (Compaq, for example), but I've yet to see a fanless PC PSU.

    Is it really that hard make? I don't mind it to be heavier or more expensive - the reliability (no moving parts) and noise level are much more important in a lot of cases (pun intended :)

    I was thinking about building one myself: old-style with a huge transformer, but then I heard that some powerful ATX PSUs can have their fans disconnected under reduced load. Can anyone clarify?

    1. Re:Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by shepd · · Score: 4, Informative

      This site has a link to a 300 W fanless ATX PSU. And a lot of other really good links too.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by terrencefw · · Score: 1
      Acorn A7000's had a 35 watt (yes, that's thirty five watts) PSU with no fan. Being an ARM processor, they didn't even have a heatsink on the CPU. And you can run Linux on them. (And yes, you could make a beowul.... )

      James

      --
      Like tinyurl, but one letter less! http://qurl.co.uk/
    3. Re:Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by ZigMonty · · Score: 2

      The early macs didn't have a PSU fan. They got real hot too ;)

    4. Re:Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by e-Alex · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here in Germany you can buy a PSU that uses passive cooling. It is manufactured by Engelking Elektronik and rated at 300 watts. Although there is one fan built in, it only kicks in at 45C. Further specs can be found here. Unfortunately, it is quite expensive at about 220 euros (1 euro ~ 1 dollar).

    5. Re:Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      An 'old style' power supply with huge transformer would probably need a BIGGER fan. I think you're talking about an old-school linear regulated power supply. Those are invariably less efficient than a modern switching power supply, and would need even more cooling.

      Also, to get the kind of current capacity needed on a modern PC you'd need one HELL of a transformer.

    6. Re:Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      There used to be third party cooling fans available for the Mac Plus. Basically a muffin fan in a plastic shroud that would slide into the handle hole on top of the dinkyscreen case.

      They sold for in excess of $300 if I remember right. Yes, for a molded plastic shroud and a muffin fan. There used to be a huge business in overcharging Macintosh users outrageously. It boosted their self esteem to pay more, for their 'better computing experience.'

    7. Re:Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by mrklin · · Score: 1
      I run a fanless PSU in my Shuttle SV24. It is technically achieved by... ripping out the fan and remove the PSU casing for better air circulation! I also use a Via C3 for CPU and runs it fanless using the stock heatsink. The HD is the Barracuda IV. Lastly, I have a quiet case fan going but could probably do without it.

      Now that is quiet. The tradeoff? Performance.

    8. Re: Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by Brother52 · · Score: 1

      No, absolutely not. The fan in a PC PSU doesn't cool the transformer. It cools the transistor that raises frequency of the source current, so you can make the transformer smaller and lighter (and cheaper).

      In my country (Russia) the voltage of public electrical network has been raised twice (from 127V to 220V) some decades ago. 220V to 127V transformers very in every home to power older equipment. Such a transformer - 1500 Watts, about half a bigger than an ATX PSU - was barely warm at full load.

      But with today's technology the more complex high-frequency design is a lot cheaper, I guess.

    9. Re:Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news by Jouster · · Score: 2
      For the benefit of those with reduced thresholds, I repost the parent (which is currently at Score: 0). Please mod parent, not this post.

      There are actually several fanless PSUs I know of. There's the TKPower one (available from Silicon Acoustics.


      Then there are the two Engelking PSUs, of which the first still has a fan that kicks in when the temperature of its heatsink exceeds 45C. The second one can be water-cooled and is available from Aqua-Computer in that configuration.


      Finally, there's the Deltatronic PSU and the soon-to-be-released RSG one.

  48. Cruesoe doesn't need a fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As far as I know, the Transmeta Cruesoe CPU doesn't need a CPU fan, so it would be a good candidate for a silent PC.

    1. Re:Cruesoe doesn't need a fan by bayankaran · · Score: 0

      But are there motherboards/cases/other stuff out there to buy and build your PC rather than buying a laptop with Crusoe processor?

      --
      Tat Tvam Asi
    2. Re:Cruesoe doesn't need a fan by mrklin · · Score: 1

      The VIA C3 processor also does not need a fan either (I am using a 900mhz one). Like Cruesoe, it is a poor performer when it comes to heavy duty processing but is perfectly fine for web and Office.

  49. mixed record by g4dget · · Score: 2
    powerbooks are similarlysilent unless emergency fans kick in.

    It's not an "emergency fan" if it runs pretty regularly during normal operation. And it does. And it is noisy, at least on my 1 year old Titanium Powerbook.

    Many musicians like the newer macs with sampler gear because they don't have to worry about systyem sound so much.

    I don't know which "newer macs" you are talking about, but some of the newer dual processor machines are very noisy, worse than most PCs.

    Apple has made some really quiet machines. Among G3 and G4 machines, the older iMacs were really quiet, and some of the towers were moderately quiet. But overall, Apple's record is pretty mixed. So, don't go out buying just any old Apple expecting it to be quiet.

    1. Re:mixed record by Senjaz · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree with your general premise. Although I also have a PowerBook G4. The fan really only seems to come on after extended use or heavy use of the graphics card usually OpenGL stuff. Even when the fan is on it's actually quite quiet in comparison to the PC on my work desk. But you notice it more since normally it's silent.

      Having said that if you've ever heard an X-Serve in operation you'll know that not all Apple's are quiet.

      --
      Don't blame me - this .sig had steal me written all over it.
  50. Variable speed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Building a totally silent PC is an expensive and often difficult experience, requiring comprimises. The most common one trading higher heat and shorter component life for noise.

    I think that variable speed fans are a better idea myself. What controllers are available (besides the digidoc) for controlling several fans based on independant heat sensors.

    Configuration ability would be a huge plus. Eg setting min and max fan speeds for min and max temps. (Some fans you want to always run, some don't matter.)

    Think about it, typically when you are generating the most heat, noise doesn't matter so much. (Playing games, movies, music, etc).

    Obviously a silent PC is the goal but this won't be seriously possible until manufactures stop the Mhz race (unlikely), and concentrate on power usage and heat (look at Via).

    1. Re:Variable speed. by RatBastard · · Score: 2

      While my noisiest system is my gaming rig, my server is second. My server is an old Pentium 233MMX with a Promise IDE controlloer pushing a a pair of mirrored 120GB drives, and a 4GB boot drive (biggest the motherboard chipset will drive). This system is on 24/7. It has three fans, the CPU fan, the PSU fan and a case fan at the rear to keep the drives cool.

      I'm seriously considering a VIA C3 system with all passive cooling for this system.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  51. Re:A great accomplishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah? My Amiga is silenter. Damn ST lusers!

  52. My take on a Quiet PC by gbsallery · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bah, I'm sure my PC is at least as quiet as theirs. Again, the PSU fan is the only fan turning in the system. The rest of it is water-cooled through an extremely bodge-tastic radiator, like this.

    As I'm using a decent pump, this is completely silent. And it looks scary.

    --
    .sig eaten by zombies
  53. Low Tech Solution: Hole in the Wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best solution: a Hole in the Wall. It is very cheap, and very effective.

    When I chose my current apartment, I made sure that there would be an unused bedroom that shared a wall with the room that would become my office. It is very important that the server room be unused for any other purpose (other than storage), because it is far too loud to spend any time in there.

    Then, I cut a hole in the wall. I bought electrical boxes, cut off the back side of the boxes, and installed them in the wall. I bought cover plates, and placed them next to the wall to cover the holes when I leave this apartment. After I leave, nobody will ever know what was behind the blank wall plates.

    One bedroom is the "server room". Actually, it has *all* the computers. They sit on a table next to the wall with the hole in it. Keyboard cable, mouse cable, video, audio, etc., all go through the hole in the wall, to the silent I/O devices on my desk in my office. This is even better than putting a PC in a closet, because

    1. Being in another room, there is even more noise suppression,
    2. Not being enclosed in a small closet, there is much less chance of overheating.
    I seriously considered the closet option, and I would do it if that was the last option available, but I think the hole in the wall solution is even better.

    The server room is horribly loud, and I hate it every time I have to work in there. Fortunately, that is not often. It's wonderfully quiet in my office for listening to mp3s while I work!

    Ken Hendrickson

  54. So THATs why... by Shalome · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I was a kid, we had an Apple II. Went on vacation in the summer, turned off the AC for a week. Came back, dead computer. Reason, according to the Apple tech? "Heat."

    So dad bought an Apple IIc. Same thing happened. Bought another Apple IIc. Same damn thing. They couldn't take the southern US summers -- the heat and humidity were too much for 'em!

    Dad switched to PCs shortly after... the first PC he ever bough (a Compaq) still runs.

    --
    Moderation totals that amuse me for one of my posts: Flamebait=1, Insightful=2, Funny=2, Overrated=1, Underrated=1
    1. Re:So THATs why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bad power.... brown out condition... not the apple ii design itself... I lost 8 pieces of equipment in a few months due to bad electricity... your apples were fine, your power was bad.

      million and millions of apples were sold, and used in deserts, military bases, etc. and fans for apple iis were almost UNHEARD OF, therefore your claims is bogus or is from bad power.

    2. Re:So THATs why... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      You are a bit off on this one, because I'm pretty sure that PC's of that aera didn't have fans, either. Heck even many 486 ran without fans. It is very improbable that it was the heat that killed your Macs, probably something else.
      And may I know why you left the Apple IIc on while leaving for vacation (and turning the AC of), I don't get it. It doesn't sounds logical to me.

    3. Re:So THATs why... by Shalome · · Score: 2

      Dude, how the hell should I know what my dad did with his computers? I was like 8!

      --
      Moderation totals that amuse me for one of my posts: Flamebait=1, Insightful=2, Funny=2, Overrated=1, Underrated=1
  55. Re:A great accomplishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's that your saying?

    I can't hear you, because your floppy drive is going "*tac*... *tac*.. *tac*.."

    -$|{

  56. Who tests these claims? by krazyninja · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there any standard way/method of testing these claims that every vendor/organisation makes? For instance, I can think of a number of ways in which this claim can be twisted: Ambient sound, position/location of the computers, position of measurement, calibration of the dB meter, temperature of the air measured at various instants of time, material on which the computers stand, consistency of readings, etc etc...Who validates all these claims? How can we truly believe these "cheapass" claims (in the same words of the author) ??

    --
    "Do something man. Right now."
    1. Re:Who tests these claims? by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      No one validates them. Never believe what's printed on the box. That's one of the big differences between 'proferssional' equipment and 'consumer' equipment. Professionals need to know this information, and so that line of products usually includes very details specifications, including the methods used to make those measurements.

      For example, speakers are usually given a frequency range in their specifications. Consumer speakers often tout 20Hz-20kHz covering the full range of human hearing. But they don't tell you that the output of the speaker can fluctuate wildly across that range. A professional speaker will give detailed plots and graphs covering the frequency output that can be expected, as well as how that output changes depending on what angle to the speaker you're listening from. Also, you will be able to expect what kind of equipment and measuring scheme was used to gather that data.

      Remember all those lab reports you skimped on in college? you can bet there's one about 50 pages thick for just about every piece of professional equipment you can find. Consumer equipment is cheap because the manufacturers don't necessarily research the development, materials, and the manufacturing techniques of their products nearly as much. Either that, or they take an existing product and replace all the components with drastically cheaper counterparts -- same technology, different quality.

      Basically, don't believe anything you read. Decibel readings for sound pressure level (SPL) don't mean anything unless they tell you exactly what frequency range and weighting procedure they used, as well as the relative positions and orientations of the source and receiver.

      As far as the decibel argument is concerned, only one link above has given some detail into the situation. Decibel ratings are defined as 10*log(I/I0), where I0 is the sound pressure intensity at the threshold of human hearing. If you double intensity, your equation becomes 10*log(2)= 3.0102999dB... But the volume we hear is proportional to the square of the intensity, therefore volume (derivation omitted) = 20*log(v/v0), so a doubling of volume = 6.0205999dB...

      We usually just approximate to 3dB and 6dB when discussing the matter.

      ~Loren

  57. Silence! by Deton8 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd accept a few degrees hotter silicon for the huge reliability boost of getting rid of the fans on the processor and graphics card (MTBF circa 15,000 hours in the real world contrary to their b.s. specs, divided by two since there are two of the little bastards). Your remaining fan in the PSU case needs a fan rotation alarm on it, and if unattended, some kind of thermal shut-off or redundant fan. One nice trick for quiet fans is to use one much bigger than you need and then run it at a slower speed. Another tip is to mount the disk drive and fans on Sorbothane standoffs, and maybe stick a couple of slabs of Sorbothane on the walls of the PC case. One quibble with the article -- for best cooling, you want as small a case as possible, not as big as possible. The objective should be to maximize the velocity of the airflow over the heatsinks, and you do this by constricting the space around them. One innovative way this has been done is through the use of engineering foams like E-PAC which allows the designer to create engineered air ducting which forces the airflow over the parts where it is needed. Some other people have asked why the PSU fan is necessary -- having just gone through CE and UL testing on one of my products, you can't imagine the kind of pain the test lab would make you go through if you took the PSU fan out of the PSU case. It's only a practical proposal for a major corporation with a lot of money and time to throw at it.

    1. Re:Silence! by Tidan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      for best cooling, you want as small a case as possible, not as big as possible

      Actually... I don't think we're looking at improving heat transfer via forced air, so a smaller case would not help. The mode of heat transport in this application is mainly free convection and not forced convection.

      As we all know from Intro to Heat Transfer, the transition to turbulence occurs at a Rayleigh number of 10^9. This number is related to physical properties of air, and is proportional to (vertical length)^3. Turbulence from free convection will improve heat transfer immensly. The longer your vertical plate is (taller case), the larger your region of turbulent flow will be, which leads to improved heat transfer, and cooler components.

      I too, am a rocket scientist. :)

      --
      free ipod? yeah.
  58. PowerMac G4s are often oud by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2

    Those who forget the apple are doomed to reinvent it. Apple has been using large heatsink, air flow design, etc for ever since the blueg3 to keep there from being too many fans in the system

    That is a bit misleading. While the number of fans is reduced recent PowerMac G4s are pretty damn loud, louder than handbuilt from cheapest available parts PCs I have sitting in the same room. Some Macs may be silent (well, when idle) but the expandable and higher performing Macs that are more comparable to PCs are not.

  59. Re:Missing the point by jkramar · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is horribly offtopic, but seemingly necessary.
    Logarithmic or not, it doesn't matter. You can't be x times quieter than something. Its not possible. You can be x times louder, but not quieter. Ignoring negatives, x * y is always going to be a larger than either x or y. It really drives me nuts how people misuse that term. You'd think a geek site would be capable of using mathematics terms correctly.

    That is incorrect. x*y is not necessarily larger than either x or y, because either can be between 0 and 1. Furthermore, "x times quieter" is equivalent to "1/x times louder", usually. Expressions such as these can hardly be considered mathematics terms.

    Now, why did I reply to that?
    --

    true && more || less
  60. Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 5, Informative

    The slot loading "original" iMac (aka the gum drop) had(has) no fans, quite hardware, and vents on the top of the case. I don't quite know if Apple's eMacs and LCD iMacs have a similar set up, however I'd bet that they have fans.

    Nevertheless, Apple still strives to build fairly quiet boxes when ever possible. I mean hey, look at the fan to heat sink ratio in this box: http://www.apple.com/hardware/gallery/pmg4_august2 002_480.html Honestly, I've never seen a bigger heat sink within a consumer PC. One could fry 10 strips of bacon on that beast.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by Jeff+Trawick · · Score: 1

      My LCD iMac has a fan which is quite loud when it runs. But it rarely runs.

    2. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by KH · · Score: 1

      FWIW, The original Macintosh 128K ('84) did not have a fan. I heard it had over-heating problem.

      I wonder if NeXT machines had fans. It's well known that Steve Jobs has problems with fans (not the people, though).

    3. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by ianscot · · Score: 2
      Really? My 17" iMac must have one too, then... I've never noticed it, not even once, not in a month or so.

      (Hooking up my sister's old firewire external drive the other day, it was amazing to realize how obnoxious a fan really is. I'm spoiled by the silent computer now.)

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    4. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 1

      Have you heard the new macs?? Incredibly loud, like a vacuum cleaner. Seriously it has this huge fan in it and when that thing starts up its loud. Apple made a mistake with the new g4's, way too noisy.

      --
      this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
    5. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by Halvard · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the overheating problems in this, the Apple ][, the Mac 256K, the Plus, all had to do with the same thing: components that were used were undersized for the load, would heat up and fail. It's akin to running a P4 XEON on a 135W powersupply; -- do that and see how long you have a running system. That's why we all replaced then with higher capacity capacitors, transistors, etc. And why I had an Applied Engineering Hard Drive for a ][E that not only had a 40MB hard drive but replaced Apple's anemic 2.5A power supply with one rated at IIRC 6A. The components and boards stopped overheating and oxidizing (and failing).

    6. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      The only problem with with my old iMac is that it has a rather loud harddrive, and whenever I play StarCraft, it spins the CD so fast for so long, I'm surprised it doesn't break.

    7. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by Jouster · · Score: 2
      I wonder if NeXT machines had fans. It's well known that Steve Jobs has problems with fans (not the people, though).
      Hmm, haven't spotted one yet....

      Jouster
    8. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by pianophile · · Score: 1

      I wonder if NeXT machines had fans.

      Yes, they did. The Cubes had a big and fairly quiet one that was attached to the back panel of the case (which is why it can't be seen in the eBay pics linked to in this thread as in every shot of the back of the case the back panel is either closed or completely removed). Slabs had a smaller fan inside. Overall , NeXTs were reasonably quiet, though the Cubes had a lot of space inside them for sounds to bounce around in and you could really hear your hard disk grinding in there.

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
    9. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by MouseR · · Score: 2

      Yes, NeXT machines had fans.

      My Color Slab (aka, neXT Station Color) has a fan that blows air out from underneath the machine through the magnesium casing which has fins molded in, making the entire machine it's own heat sync. The noise coming out of that machine is average.

      My NeXT Cube, however, has a central rear-mounted 4" fans that suck air from the front of the machine, from above the hard drives and through the power supply. The mother board is on the side, next to the Dimension video board. They don't generate much heat, but air circulation within the cubic magnesium enclosure is enough to keep the machine somewhat cool. But the fan is noisy. Mind you, not as much as it's aging drive (which I'll have to replace at some point).

    10. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by MouseR · · Score: 2

      I should have looked at the pictures before completing my previous reply.

      The NeXT Cube fan is mounted on the back plate of the computer. it is connected with a rubber spring cord (much like keyboards). You can see that spring cord in one of the shots, but not the fan.

      The cord can easily be disconnected.

    11. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't heard a PEEP out of my LCD iMac... Then again, I run it in a 12x12 room with 22 other "devices", mostly on a rack. I use quotation marks because a device can range from a 8 disk NAS to a meesly little iPaq.

      By the way, If you light m-80's in my working room, i prolly wouldn't hear that either.

      Has anyone heard of server-room "sound management" solutions _OTHER_ than replacing hardware as THG suggests? Just curious.

    12. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by bedouin · · Score: 1

      I have a DVD drive in a firewire enclosure; anyone think it would be safe to just disable the fan in it?

    13. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by PleaseDontBeTaken · · Score: 1

      The hard disks they used to put in Macs sounded like a little man inside shaking a gourd every time it spun up. I hope the new ones are better than that.

      --
      --
    14. Re:Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

      I've come across this observation before and have to wonder if it comes from Mac users or PC users. I've never owned a Mac, but from my limited experience with them I have a hard time believing that the new G4's could really be as bad as the average PC.

  61. Re:can't use flash drives by terrencefw · · Score: 3, Informative
    forget rotating disk drives. Get a mobo with RAID and a bunch of totally solid state flash hard drives [sandisk.com]. they're electrically identical to laptop hard drives, so a $25 adaptor will allow them to be used in place of any old IDE hard drive in your RAID, but you'll have to change the "I" in the acronym from "Inexpensive" to "Independent", if you know what I mean.

    On the other hand if you think about the performance you'd get from the right kind of RAID where the individual "disks" have specs like these [sandisk.com]... suddenly everything else seems small.

    Yeah... but flash drives have a limited number of write operations. They're find for digital cameras and the like, where they'll only get written on a few thousand times, but once you tried to run a full OS on them, you'd reach their limit and your data would start to disappear. They're great though on things like Linux/BSD router boxes where you can have the OS on a read-only disk.

    --
    Like tinyurl, but one letter less! http://qurl.co.uk/
  62. Cube Quieter? Well, lets go buy some [sarcasm] by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2

    The Cube was a fine attempt at a pro level iMac but it is a dead product, not really comparable to things you can actually go out and buy today. If you want to open the field to dead products then the "news" is much older than the Mac or Apple.

    1. Re:Cube Quieter? Well, lets go buy some [sarcasm] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, let's go to BestBuy and get one of these "Dead Silent PCs"!

      Oh yeah, you can't - someone pieced it together in their bathroom. Whatever.

      This "dead-silent" home-brew PC hasn't been shown to be a stable production quality machine. Who knows, it might not work at all... there's only one, and it might already be burnt out.

      So the Apple Cube might be a "dead production product", but the cube is a relatively modern machine, it's a production-quality machine, it's supported by a manufacturer, and it's substantially quieter than the touted "dead silent" machine.

      So is this "dead silent" machine impressive? Well, it ain't dead silent, and have no plans to build one and risk my hardware investment - so I think it's just a curiosity and nothing more.

  63. More hardcore than hardcoreware by juventasone · · Score: 5, Informative

    The guys at Silent PC Review would scoff at the "hardcoreness" of hardcoreware.net when it comes to silencing PCs. After being on their mailing list for a year, I can tell you that they're waaay ahead of these guys in every aspect of PC silencing, many of which I've implemented myself.

  64. Why no sealed case? by PsyQ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been using an acoustically sealed case from Noise Control. I really can't hear my PC anymore.

    I also use one of Noise Control's modified Enermax PSUs and a Silverado CPU cooler. That's all I did to my PC to make it quiet, everything else is stock. A quiet case seems to be the most logical (and least expensive) first step if you ask me. If you can still hear any of your components after you've put them behind 2 cm of noise blocking fluffy stuff, you can start replacing noisy those one by one until the noise stops.

    Noise Control now has their own fan control circuitry and new modified PSUs come with it built-in. Also, they have hard drive cages that catch vibrations before they reach your case. With all of that equipment it should be easy to quiet any PC.

  65. I don't know if I'd like this by lewp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've become rather used to the rhythmic hum of my PCs (there are four in this room) while I sleep. Sure, I had to get a voltage regulator for the 6000-something RPM fan on my Athlon XP's heatsink (even I have limits), but I didn't turn it down too far. Hell, none of my PCs even have cases on them besides the laptop.

    Of course, on the rare occasions when members of the opposite sex have slept in this room (Gasp! It has happened. Recently, even!) I have gotten more than one complaint about the noise and turned my boxen off. I just chalk it up to the fact that the girls don't tend to be geeks, which isn't such a bad thing :).

    --
    Game... blouses.
  66. Re:Missing the point by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Because you're not multiplying. You're dividing. "Times" implies multiplication. Obviously, what they mean is a quarter of the volume, buts it's not very technically accurate.

  67. What about mini-ITX silent cases ? by skaya · · Score: 1

    Grab a mini-ITX fanless motherboard, a fanless case, and you have a really quiet PC this time. No fan, no moving parts. OK, I've got to admit that they lack hard disk and CPU power. But they make really powerful and cool X-terminals. Add a ZIP drive, and you have a quiet 250 mb mass storage. If you're rich, plugin a 1 GB USB "pen drive", you have 1 GB of mass storage. That will be expansive, but this time they are truly quiet, and the cases are nice looking (looks a bit like a PS2, but lightly smaller). But don't think playing warcraft 3 with those things ...

  68. Language by j_w_d · · Score: 2

    Not that this changes the actual logic, but I think these problems arise from poor language skills rather than poor math skills. After all, I have seen few if any "/."rs complain about a barbarism like "architected" substituted for "design." And I've encountered cross-eyed confusion as some illerate tries to work out why "trialling" is wrong but "testing" is OK.

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
    1. Re:Language by j_w_d · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently I can't spell "illiterate" either.

      --
      ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
    2. Re:Language by Jouster · · Score: 2

      I'd like to note that my story was submitted sans spelling errors, and my comments are always properly capitalized and always use appropriate punctuation. How many /.'ers do you know that follow those rules, let alone others?

      "Twenty times quieter" is a generally-accepted shortening of "one-twentieth of the volume".

      Jouster
      (Story Author)

  69. My silent PC by chocolatei · · Score: 2, Informative

    My PC is underclocked with an overspec'ed PSU and hence there are zero fans. With 1G of cache memory the harddisk never spins up. The loudest thing is the monitor - it clicks when changing res. and hisses slightly, sort of like a very distant stream. I don't know what that is in dB but then it is quieter than ambient noise.

  70. I've built a dead silent PC. by N+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not difficult to achieve.

    Due to a hard disk error, my home PC is both dead and silent.

  71. Tinnitus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And not only do you risk losing your hearing. You also risk getting tinnitus (ringing in the ears), which is really annoying.

    1. Re:Tinnitus by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      What's even more annoying, is that I never listened to really loud music. Never been that fussed. I can only think that on one of the occasions at the student's union I damaged my hearing.
      I have about an 8Khz ringing in my right ear. Very irritating when I think about it (one does tend to tune it out). ARGH It's started again!

  72. A few nights ago I awoke in my sleep by Kasmiur · · Score: 5, Funny

    As soon as I woke I knew something was wrong. And looked around my room. Noticed it was darker than usual. After turning on the bedroom light I looked and saw my pc was off. Then I found out the power went out in the middle of the night. If it wernt for my pc and my wakeing up I could have been late for work.

    I actually find the gentle hum and whirl of my pc comforting. along with the blinking yellow light and the faint green glow it gives my room.

    --
    -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
    1. Re:A few nights ago I awoke in my sleep by medraut · · Score: 1

      Except when your fans start to sound like an SUV that has gone without a service for the last few years.

      Dust buildup is a killer.

      Medraut

  73. Amoeba floppy drives by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    I can't hear you, because your floppy drive is going "*tac*... *tac*.. *tac*.."

    LOL! So true...

    The thing I remember about the Amoeba (which I thought was a downgrade from the C64, since all the scrolling games ran slower) was that it took longer to list a directory of a floppy disk than the PC took to copy the entire disk (if there were many small files the amiga had to read the entire disk several times to display a directory).

    Although it at least had long filenames at the time unlike the PC (and multitasking). And unlike the ST it didn't pause for two seconds whenever you clicked the mouse (a tip for GUI designers, when using a "mouse click" event remember to include the position it was clicked at) and require you to change monitors when you ran different programs.

    And yeah, the C64 was silent, unless you had a 1541 with the "daisy daisy" program :-)

  74. A truly silent PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I recently built a truly silent machine for my living room.

    No Fans whatsoever.
    No Hard Disk.
    No CD/DVD Drive.
    No moving parts whatsoever.Even the power supply is fanless.

    Now I can hear the noise that the inductors on the PSU make.

    30dB isn't silent... it's the same as someone whispering.

    0db is silent.

  75. Annoyed by the computer fans? Here's the solution. by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Buy a ticket to a heavy metal concert. Make sure to mention that you must get a place near one of the
    speaker batteries. After the concert you go home to your dear computer and do some programming...
    You won't hear much of your computer fan for the coming 24 hours.

  76. Apple IIs... by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

    Most computers of that aera didn't have fans, e.g. the legendary C64, C128 etc., on one hand because the CPUs back then didn't get that hot (even PCs up to 486's didn't necessarily need active cooling), on the other hand because a lot of heat generating components (harddrives, high-end graphics cards, other drives) were either external or had not been invented yet or just didn't generate that much heat because they were much much less powerful (and sadly more power in most components means more heat generation). At least as long as we talk of microcomputers (no, your PDP or VAX or tube-based computer doesn't count here).

    But it is a little bit daring to compare the heat generated by systems from 20 years ago with today's systems without admitting that today's systems are so much more powerful that most of us back then never would have dreamed of ever owning such a system.

  77. Re: harddrive still make noise by cheekyboy · · Score: 0

    To me fans are quiet any way, you can get 'new super' fans which are quieter any way, so you can replace the cpu/psu fans with better ones.

    HDs on the other hand, esp 7200/10000 rpms have that high pitch , eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee noise.Thats why laptop 5400s are so quiet.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  78. Re:Missing the point by hatchet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's just figure of speech. It's same for faster slower. We say car A is 3 times slower than car B. Which is(or may seem) incorrect, but we use it anyway. We should say car A is one third as fast as car B.
    So it doesn't matter how we say it.. as long as listener understands it.

  79. Re:20 times quieter? no way, lunkhead by D+iz+a+n+k+Meister · · Score: 0

    So is that Pentium 4 2.80G processor 2 times faster than a Pentium 4 1.4G?

    If so, does it complete jobs 2 times faster?

    This is crack-smoking semantics.

    --

    He painted a unicorn in outer space. I'm askin' ya, what's it breathin'?
  80. Re:A great accomplishment by yowi · · Score: 0

    That is a very dangerous situation, please refer to "Tales from the White Heart" by Arthur C Clark for a full explination. :-)

    --
    Why don't the headlines ever read 'Psychic wins lottery'
  81. I want one! by roly · · Score: 0

    Waah!

    --
    "With Microsoft, you get Windows. With Linux, you get the full house" - unknown
  82. case they used by Skal+Tura · · Score: 0

    that thermaltake case is nearly exactly like my case, my case just doesn't have the window, is different color(blue/electric blue) without logos, and doesn't have a hole on the 'door' for front panel, which is also missing from my case.

    My case cost me 90e without PSU and is made by chieftec, http://www.chieftec.com/products/Workcolor/ColorDX .htm

    you can see pics of the on page 6, http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/other/silent_p c/6.php that case they used is priced $169.99 USD on 'sale' at http://www.thermalmasters.com/
    they have cheaper thermaltake cases also, they include still the front panel. Thermalmasters does not say is the side fan included or not, it came with Chieftec.

    Inside is exactly the same according to the pictures @ thermalmasters. Although this Thermaltake case looks more awesome than the Chieftec one it is more expensive, also this Chieftec case i have can be get cheaper if you take the Black version, it does not include the fan at side.
    So if you are budget i recommend selecting Chieftec instead of Thermaltake case.
    if anyone is intrested i can also post pictures of my Chieftec case.

  83. Are you all stoned, or what?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    :)

    65dB / 40dB = 10^2.5 ~= 316 times as loud.

    The reason doubling a sound results in a gain of 3dB is because 10^.3 ~= 2 (adding a second speaker will give you an overall gain of ~3dB, etc.)

    However, your hearing sensitivity is non-linear as well (not really logarithmic, though). So it would not really *sound* 316 times as loud - it would sound quite a bit louder, though.

    For example, a quiet library is around 30dB, and a thuderclap is around 130dB... so that's about 10^10 = 10 billion times louder. But it won't sound 10 billion times as loud.

    Another interesting fact - the sun is about 1 billion times brighter than the full moon. So, when there is a full moon and you can see quite clearly at night - your eyes have adjusted in sensitivity by something like 10-100 million times (since many people would say its about 10-100 times brighter during the day)!

    One more - the black text from a laser jet print-out is as bright in the sunlight as the white of the paper is when you are indoors under normal lighting conditions. That is, if you printed out a solid black page, it would be as bright when in the sunlight as a blank white page is when indoors. The difference in appearance (the printout will look black in the sunlight, and the paper will look white indoors) is due purely to the adjustment of your eyes.

    1. Re:Are you all stoned, or what?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude you are so completely wrong it smells ! :)

      I can't believe how many people on here do not know how it works. It seems only the electrical engineers will be the ones who know this.

      To produce twice the volume of sound you require twice the power, this magic number is known as 3dB (43 db is twice the volume of sound as 40dB and requires twice the power, so say 100w rms to produce 43 and 50w rms to produce 40 - just an example). The human ear perceives a virtual 'doubling of sound' at around 10 dB which is being bandied around this discussion like a scientific number, it is merely a sign that human ear is an extremely poor gauge for measuring sound.

  84. Don't forget by borgdows · · Score: 1

    The most silent PC is the PC you keep power off!

  85. parent post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is wrong.

    the thin fins cannot possibly transfer the heat to the tips of the fins, they are too thin, that is what the parent's parent tried to say, but then some jackass who thinks he is a rocket scientist tries to be a smart ass, and then misinforms the rest of the /. community with his +4 post.

    I guess the moderators are smoking crack, or at least dont know fucking shit about fucking physics.

  86. What about DVD-readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ive been running QuietPC components to make my PC silent enough so that I can watch a DVD, but I find the loudest thing on my PC is the DVD-reader itself, the CD-Rom reader is even worse. Anyone know of anywhere that puublishes noise specs for DVD-Players.

  87. Re:A great accomplishment by sirius_bbr · · Score: 0

    "Always too loud"???? My atari 1040ST is silent.

    I bet it makes a _lot_ of noise if you start using the keyboard...

    --
    this sig has intentionally been left blank
  88. DANGEROUSLY heavy heatsink! by mosschops · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The full-copper version of the Zalman P4 heatsink weighs 898g (that's about 2.1 pounds). That's nearly TWICE what Intel recommend as the maximum weight for a P4 heatsink. Moving the PC around with the heatsink attached could cause serious damage.

    Zalman also do an alternative P4 fan, which still uses the copper base but is made mainly of Alumin(i)um. It weighs in at just 400g, which is much safer. It doesn't cool quite as well, but I believe it still does a very good job. The ~2700rpm fan supplied with the heatsink is pretty much inaudible anyway - I've got one in my system, and I'm very fussy about PC noise.

  89. Could be quieter.. by Fweeky · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Barracuda V is actually somewhat quieter than the Barracuda IV they used.

    Use the extra leeway to add a few fans; don't forget, if everything's running close to their design limits now, it'll probably get hairy if you have a hot summer.

    Plus it's really a good idea to keep components like HD's fairly cool. Let them fry and you risk reducing the service life of the drive and increasing the chances of data loss. You at least want reliable storage, right?

    Also, you should be careful with that huge-ass Zalman cooler. They're very heavy, and will happily tear off the socket if you happen to move the machine anywhere. The full Cu version is about 200g heavier than AMD's maximum recommended weight.

  90. 0 dB.. by paranoic · · Score: 2

    is the softest sound a normal person can hear.

  91. ESR meter by extra88 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Almost impossible to detect without special equipment, i.e. an ESR meter.
    If you do decide to get one, just remember not to put it next to your RMS meter. they'll both get totally out of whack.
  92. Re:Missing the point by anichan · · Score: 1

    Because you're not multiplying. You're dividing.

    Huh? 4/2 = 4 * 0.5, last I checked. Now, it implies that the person reading the statement "20x quieter" knows how to take the inverse of the quantity and use that in their scale.

    Finally, this is not a scientific journal. In the "Real World", when A is 10x louder than B, B is 10x quieter than A.

    --

    karma is for the weak >)

  93. 40 dB? That's supposed to be quiet? by naasking · · Score: 2

    Using the components from QuietPC you can achieve less than 30 dB. You can't even hear this level in a quiet room.

    Hmmm... in reading the article, they mention that the sound readings were taken right next to the power supply, so that may be why they are so high.

  94. how about ZERO fans? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    since i didn't see this link posted yet.. http://www.zerofanzone.co.uk/

    zero fans.. and not running at 67c+

    and one thing to note, the p4 has throttling so running it too hot(67++) won't crash it but it will start to get slugghish at points you wouldnt except..

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  95. Mod this up, I'm posting anonymously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The noise in a computer comes from the fans. Many fans seem to be sold/made with moving parts and nothing to stop the noise-making friction created by the spinning. Usually, it'll be possible to simple remove the sticker on a fan, place a drop or two of sowing-machine oil (nothing too thick mind you) and replace the sticker. Run it for a little while to make sure it isn't dripping (don't do anything silly about having the power on with the fans out) and then place it back in the computer. I've got 5 fans in my computer and I've done this with 4 of them, it has reduced the noise quite a bit.

    Also, it pays to take the case off and remove the dust from the fans and heatsinks every so often. Dust can be dangerous; if you've got carpet in your house, and you run your computer alot, the dust buildup can set things like the powersupply box on fire. I take the PSU apart every so often and clean it out (shssss).

  96. Re:Missing the point by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Yes.... Notice how you're multiplying by a different value from the one you're dividing by. If I said something was 50% quieter, would you assume it was half as loud, or 1/1.5 = 2/3 as loud?

    If it is the latter, then congratulation, your mathematics are consistent for values above and below 1. I'd go for the former.

    Why couldn't they just say "less than a quarter of the volume", thus making it clearer to people who are technically minded, and find that this sort of distinction matters in their work or studuies.

  97. Contain PC in a box by TheVidiot · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about putting a noisy PC inside some sound-absorbing case (with good air flow). Wouldn't that be much easier? Does anyone have any experience with this model?

    Thanks!

  98. 40 dB vs. 65 dB is 1/300 not 1/20! by MacBoy · · Score: 1

    As the subject says, an SPL of 40 dB is 1/316 of the loudness of an SPL of 65 dB.

    (ratio as dB) = 10 * log(ratio)

    25 = 10 * log r
    2.5 = log r
    10^2.5 = r
    316 = r (the ratio)

  99. OT: Re:20 times quieter? by Marc2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But it's a fairly obscure point that most people seem to just ignore.

    I do agree with your logic, however saying "twenty times larger" is a form mathematical slang to begin with. Are we multiplying 20 by the integerial value of the string "larger"? Well, no. The multiplication by fractions to describe a smaller quantity is quite lucid, but we're not really talking about strict mathematics anymore, so it really becomes a matter of whether or not you want to adhere to the conventions of the notation from whence your phrase descended. Keeping that in mind, it becomes more of a question of which is proper in English grammar.

    --
    --- What
  100. why quiet PCs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with this quiet PC business? When I turn on my PC, I want it to sound like an airplane taking off. This is also why you get good speakers, and turn the volume up :)

  101. a friend did that in college by AssFace · · Score: 2

    When I was a senior ('99), a friend of mine did that with his system. At the time that was a PIII (maybe a high end PII, don't recall) and the main difference then was just a quiet power supply.

    it was really quiet, but then, we listened to music most of the time anyway, so it didn't matter.

    I always have my computers (at least two) going all the time, and I don't leave the cases on (never have), so mine are pretty loud, but cheap and fast :)
    After graduating college, I didn't have my computers up and going for a month and had trouble sleeping it was so quiet.

    Now in my apartment, my systems are out in the living room, and my gf hates the noise, so I tend to actually turn them off most of the time now (gasp!), so I would actually love to setup a quiet system like this.
    Although I'm not likely going to be doing it until I move later (to Bermuda) seeing as I don't really want to bother with shipping anything beyond the hard drives that I have in my current systems and then sell the rest on craigslist.

    Also - if you don't need to do gaming (sounds funny to say "need" in that statement), then a laptop is another alternative to having a very quiet system - I have always been impressed with how quiet the Sony Vaios are (Viao? whatever)

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  102. looks like they lost by painehope · · Score: 0

    their server as well...
    viva la /. effect!

    --
    PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
  103. Re:Quiet PC? Yes, diskless client! by CvD · · Score: 2

    You can make a diskless client to access the noisy PC. I did that for a while couple years back. Dunno why I stopped... having your / partition over a 100 mbit/s network is still kinda slow compared to IDE.

    Anyway, you have an image on a floppy which has a kernel on it, which then looks over the network to mount an NFS partition and boot the rest of the OS. You put /sbin/hdparm -y /dev/hda in your rc.local and your HD switches off.

    This was when the PSU fan was the only fan in my computer (Pentium 200) and it was load adjusting, so it'd speed up with more load. After the HD shut off, everything became wonderfully silent. :-)

    Cheers!

    CvD.

  104. Re:Missing the point by Jouster · · Score: 2

    That's easy: because "over twenty times quieter" doesn't sound as stilted as "less than one-twentieth of the former volume". ;),
    Jouster
    (Story author)

  105. Right up until.... by raygundan · · Score: 1

    You turn on your 1541, at which point the quiet hole and the massive thrashing noise produced by the floppy drive collide, producing a sound/anti-sound reaction that will destroy life as we know it! (Or possibly just corrupt your cracked copy of Gauntlet.)

  106. Where are you measuring from? dB or dBA? by TibbonZero · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, this is really gonna depend on what you are measuring and where you are measuring it from.
    To say that a Jet Aircraft is 140dB is meaningless. 140dB at almost any frequency would hurt alot, and probably cause a bit of damage after a few minutes. I know that there are jets taking off from Logan right now but, for some reason I am not losing my hearing. It all depends where you measure it from. There isn't a standard distance.

    So quiet PC could be measuring from farther away (and because of the inverse square law, it would get 10 dB quieter pretty fast).

    Another thing that nothing here is mentioning is dB @ a freqency @ a distance, or if it's dBA @ a distance. Your ears wouldn't be able to hear 50dB @ 40hz, let alone 30dB @ 80 hz. You could hear 30dB at 2000hz though. dBA is a weighting of multiple bands, and is another beast altogether.

    Another thing is if you are measuring the sound right beside the power supply, you are screwing your measurements anyway. It's acting as a Plane Source if r So basically, move the mic a few feet away, not right up on the thing.

    I am personally wondering if they used a good measurement system, or just a radioshack thing...

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  107. Screwed up with tags by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

    Crap, I just messed up a whole paragraph because I didn't preview and the 's messed it up. Grr. Basically you want the measuring distance (r) to be a b r (where a and b are the dimensions of the object creating sound), because the sound attenuates according to the inverse square law then (6db/doubling of distance)... I had more, but I really screwed it up with the tags...

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  108. And as soon as you play a DVD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the thing wants to take off again!! Why does a PC DVD player make such a noise if the ones you park next to your TV are so quiet? Or am I missing the 'only go as fast as you have to when playing movies' button?

  109. viola? nose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Viola! Instant nose reduction.

    What does playing the violin's big brother have to do with telling the truth?

    a song with a lot of base.

    You mean "Invasion of the Gabber Robots" by The Laziest Men on Mars?

    -- Pinocchio
  110. Dead, Silent PC. by JollyFinn · · Score: 1

    Poor PC processors are typically kept at sub human sized box. They scream of their pain. Thats where the sound comes. They are tied up by lines going back of your computer to the wall. And some nasty individuals TORTURE THEM TO DEATH!!! The guy that did following is known to torture them by making them work to extreme.

    http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTAxMTQ5 OD YyNXRja0paQ1lLMXRfMV8xMF9sLmpwZw==

    Go and free the poor creatures. Let no man take advantage of these poor creatures and burn them to death or torture them any more.
    Set them free cut the cables they are tied up with, send them to wilderness. Out of their caces. To see the mother nature, swim freely at local lake... Release the poor creatures.

    --
    Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  111. Explanation of log by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here, once and for all, is a log scale mathematics explanation. I'm still a student so I remember something about it:

    Sound level is how loud a sound is to human ears. It can be measured in dB and an increase of 10 dB sounds ten times louder to human ears.
    Sound intensity measures the energy of the sound, often in W/m^2. (Watts per metre squared.) If you multiply the sound intensity by the face area of your eardrum, you'll get the number of Joules per second (W = J/s) that your ear is perceiving. This scale is linear with human hearing perception, so double the intensity means it sounds twice is loud.

    The Equation:
    B = 10log(I/Io)

    B = sound level in dB
    I = sound intensity in W/m^2
    Io = sound floor of human hearing, Io = 1x10^-12 W/m^2

    So, doing the math, 40dB = 1.0 x 10^-8 W/m^2.

    And 31 dB = 1.26x10^-9 dB

    So therefore, 40 dB is 7.94 times more intense, and therefore 7.94 times louder to human ears.

    (7.94 = 1.0 x 10^-8 / 1.26x10^-9 )

    Note: the previous poster's comment about one being 2,512 times quieter than the other was for different values, and this information does not override that person's (correct) calculation.

    Thank you, and have a nice day :-)

    1. Re:Explanation of log by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "And 31 dB = 1.26x10^-9 dB"

      That should be 1.26x10^-9 W/m^2

  112. Comparison PC is 65 dB by Doctor+Sbaitso · · Score: 1

    Where did they find a PC that was 65 dB?

    65 dB is the level of a small orchestra.

    --

    ---
    Hello, Slashdot user. My name is Dr. Sbaitso. I am here to help you.
  113. Dude, get a Dell! by mrm677 · · Score: 2

    Like Dell or not, they make some of the quietest Wintel machines there are.

  114. Re: harddrive still make noise by Jouster · · Score: 2

    Actually, laptop hard drives run at 4200 RPMs.

    Except for mine, that is! :)

    Jouster
    (Story Author)

  115. So - what frequency range is the noise in? by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

    The human ear is not linearly sensitive to different frequencies - lower frequencies ( ~10 kHz) are harder to hear. There are standard profiles - called "contours" - for measuring the output of speakers, to check how well they are adapted to the human ear.

    It would be interesting to build a fan with either very large blades, or very small, that would generate low respectively high frequencies, thereby eliminating some of the perceived noise level.

  116. 40dB? How about 23db by nickhaddady · · Score: 1

    40 dB is pretty freaking loud when you compare it to the 23 dB machines the folks at Carillon Audio can build. They are sweet, and industry tested. :)

  117. iMacs and cubes did this 2+ years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares? Just because you x86 people run portable heaters for machines and require 10k rpm fans to cool the overly hot chips....

    iMac's were fanless 2+ years ago, and I'd wager my iMac's PSU fan is smaller, less obtrusive and a _lot_ quieter than the one listed above. The power requirements alone for that unit are literally 3-4x what an imac would require. Oh ya.. less us forget Apple's cube as well. No fans (zero, not even psu), small form factor, large power acheived.

    Honestly x86 needs to get with the times as far as innovative designs go. If I have to see another white mid tower I will scream!

    (yes I'm trolling, but it's warranted given the fact this is big news in x86 world as it's old news in ppc world)

  118. Mark me down for HITW cooling by uptownguy · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to say that I, too, went for the hole in the wall method of making my PC quiet. A few Belkin cables shoved through the hole to extend the keyboard, mouse and monitor and -- volia -- even my $300 white box PC with the fan like a jet engine is silent (to me) when I use my computer.

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  119. hardcoreware.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wowsa... this is Georules from hardcoreware.net and glad to see we have been slashdotted, but just want to say our server is usually a lot faster, we don't usually have this mass of traffic, heh.

  120. shuttle ss51g? by honold · · Score: 1

    you can do this same thing in a tiny cube with a shuttle ss51g. the only fan in the system is an 80mm case fan, and it would accept a p4 2.8/ti4200/etc.

    http://us.shuttle.com/specs2.asp?pro_id=76

  121. the abnormal finally got us to mediocrity by popisdead · · Score: 1

    so it took a large amount of effort from some pc users to make a machine that comes close to being as quiet as a Mac. Does anyone else think it's stupid this is not the norm? i hate listening to machines. a computer should not need 6 fans (props to my gaming friends sic) and sound like they go to 11. they should be dead quiet and very cool and very stable. not saying mine fulfils that...

  122. extreme cooling with 35-40db sound level... by bartman1847 · · Score: 1

    Chip-Con ApS's Prometeia vapor cooling system which can not only get the hottest AMD(72-77 watts) down to -40c (yes NEGATIVE 40c), but it also is only 40db during boot up, then 35db during normal operation...
    There isn't a block for VGA just yet, but I don't see why it wouldn't be in the next version...
    Info+pics here
    lots of review links

    The biggest drawback is the price. Even if you only try to buy "the fridge" alone (bottom part of the case+cooler unit). The price still hovers above $600...

    I don't think this product has been on slashdot before. If it has, this is just a reminder of a very "cool" product :D

  123. is this even original??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.quietpcusa.com/articles/how_to_silence_ a_computer.html

    the guy who is in charge of hardcoreware.net, lowlight, has been accused of hacking other sites before. I don't know if i trust him

    1. Re:is this even original??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Georules again.. not to be too profane, but what the hell are you talking about?

  124. Mistake by molywi · · Score: 1

    Turns out the poster must not have read the whole article, since there are two fans not just one.


    The Power Supply is actually serving 2 purposes in our dead silent PC. First of all it is of course going to be our PSU unit, but it is also the only thing with fans in the entire PC. That's right, when I say silent I mean it. Since it is serving this purpose as well, we are going for Tt's dual fan solution (they also offer single fan PSUs which should be even quieter).

  125. My Solution by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 1

    TiBook.

    The fan has come on 3 or 4 times since I have had it. CD is quiet too. Good computer for audio/video stuff because its so damn quiet.

    TiBook G4 400mhz (lowly) with 640 Megs or RAM does 24 tracks of 24/48k audio with _gobs_ of Waves plugins including Lexicon reverbs and lots of compressors.

    It's freakin quiet.

  126. DarkPC by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    Yet another story about a quiet PC. Ho-hum.

    What I want is a dark PC. All the glowing, flashing, red, blue, green, yellow LEDs on my computer and assorted peripherals are becoming extremely annoying. Of course I'll tell you why.

    My PC is in my bedroom. I don't have an office. I can't park it in the garage. That's because I'm renting a room and the guy whose house it is won't let me put it anywhere else. The problem arises when I lay down to bed at night. I turn off the light and the room doesn't get dark!

    With nearly 50 LEDs, fluorescent displays, and neon lights between my computers, monitor, keyboards, KVM switch, printers, hub, switch, power strip, clock radio, ad nauseum, it's so bright you could grow plants. Since I sleep best in total darkness, well, you see the problem. (BTW, it's not the noise that bothers my sleep. I have a fan running all night long to mask out other noises.)

    I've been resorting to just turning everything off at night. But this is a rather inconvenient solution: what if I wake up in the middle of the night (probably because all those LEDs are annoying me) and I just have to get up and log on to get that Slashdot First Post?

    I've considered some solutions, but they have problems. Black electrical tape comes to mind, but that's just plain ugly, and you can't see the flashing lights when you want to see them without peeling the tape off. I could go in with wire cutters and snip! off the leads. Too permanant. I might actually want to use those LEDs some day.

    My dream (it's a daydream, since I can't sleep) is a circuit which could be set to dim or darken the lights on command, at a preset time, or when the screensaver kicks in. What makes it a little more difficult is that it would have to be adapted to each peripheral. (I'm sure someone will provide a link to Google. Ha ha. Beat you to it.)

    Oh well, black tape it is.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    1. Re:DarkPC by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      You mean the feature they've had on cars for years?

      No, the computer industry's not that user-friendly yet :)

      They haven't figured out that non-engineers use computers.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  127. Building a Dead Silent PC by Virtex · · Score: 2

    The article's subject says is all. I would assume if the PC is dead, it would be silent as well.

    --
    For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
  128. vu*20 == 13db change by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    "...in general 10db is considered to sound like 'a doubling in volume'..."

    Wrong again.

    Mathematically, 10dB indicates a change by a factor of 10 (an order of magnitude) of the power. 3dB indicates a doubling. So 13dB is 20x.

    A change of 13dB equates to a change in energy levels by a factor of 20.

    That said, the human mind tends to comprehend a change of 10dB as a doubling (or halving) of loudness.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  129. WTF? by pclminion · · Score: 1
    Some speakers can make it up to 130dB but will start to distort at 110dB, where as some wont distort up to 115dB but can only go to 125dB. Which one would you rather have?

    Um, my sense of hearing?

    Im tired of people doing stupid things with speakers.

    Such as deafening themselves?

    1. Re:WTF? by packeteer · · Score: 2

      It all depends on how close you are to the speaker. If you have speakers putting out 125dB obviously they wont be next to your keybaord. Soemthing like that is used to fill a whole room or house of music. Great to setup on the porch for a party or something.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  130. Re:C64 Power Supply by Brother+Fjordhr · · Score: 1

    I had (I think I still have) a C64 that would regularly shutdown due to heat when used for word processing and games.

    I wound up taking the power supply (external) apart and attaching huge heatsinks to just about everything in the PSU. then I put the whole thing in a box and put a fam on it. And this was living in a house that the temps were regularly about 40f (I was sharing a place with a bunch of other students and we decided heat was too expensive). The only point if this is that the old computers also had heat problems.

  131. its been done by brad3378 · · Score: 2

    > The only fan in the entire system is in the PSU.

    My Gateway Destination with a 233 PII has that.
    Its basically got a fan shroud that redirects the power supply's air over the processor's heatsink.

    I'm attempting to duplicate the shroud idea using plexiglass scraps on my other computers.
    Its such a simple concept. Why doesn't anybody sell kits to do this?

    --

  132. Water Cooling != Silent by seafoodbuffet · · Score: 1
    People who get water cooling just for the silence are kidding themselves. While you might get a modest reduction in noise, most water cooled systems still have a number of noise generating parts depending on how your system is setup. A typical water cooling system consists of:
    • a pump to circulate water
    • a radiator to cool the water
    • a water resevoir
    • heat exchangers that carry heat away from the cpu, video card, etc.
    In this setup, there's usually at least one fan (80 or 120mm) on the radidiator. Also, don't forget that simply having water cooling doesn't completely rid you of case fans either. So even if you have only one case fan, you still have a pump, a radiator fan, a power supply fan, and a case fan all buzzing away. That's still plenty loud (though not as loud as seven case fans, cpu, video card, etc, etc). The point is water cooling tends to be effective in terms of cooling performance and only acceptable in terms of noise levels, but total silence isn't possible until you remove more moving parts.
  133. 40 dB is quiet but not ground-breaking nor silent by majid · · Score: 1

    PC Power & Cooling have an off the shelf P4 model called the Sleekline that is now running at 39-40dB with the new motherboard rev.

    The Compaq EVO D510 ultra-small desktop is rated at 19 dB. The mini-tower model with expansion capabilities is 22 dB.

    The Signum Data FutureClient does away with fans altogether and uses fluid cooling for the ultimat ein silence. Unfortunately, it isn't available in the US (yet).

    Apparently, interest for silent PCs is greater in Europe, probably because of more stringent workplace ergonomics laws in countries such as Sweden.

    A few other links for Silent PCs:

  134. TKPower Fanless PSU by Guppy · · Score: 2

    Is it really that hard make? I don't mind it to be heavier or more expensive - the reliability (no moving parts) and noise level are much more important in a lot of cases (pun intended :)

    Silicone Acoustics carries a 300 watt fanless PSU from TKPower. However, although the power output is standard ATX, the unit itself is not standard ATX sized, so the case will have to be modified for installation. There's a guide with instructions and pictures on the site for how this is done.

  135. Macs are no longer quiet by skybrian · · Score: 1

    I recently bought an eMac and was quite disappointed with the loud fan. Furthermore, unlike a laptop, the fan runs all the time, not just when there's high CPU usage. Since 'sleep' works so well it's livable, but if you're looking for a quiet server to leave on all the time, you'd be better off with something else.

    It's my understanding that the dual-processor desktop models are quite loud as well.

  136. two words by 33nine3 · · Score: 0

    My cube.

  137. I was able to make a quiter PC.... by WeeLad · · Score: 2, Funny

    just by allowing Windows to Search for the best driver for my soundcard.

    --
    Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
  138. Longer cables beats quieter fans... by dtjohnson · · Score: 0

    Spending a few bucks buying a set of long cables for display, keyboard, speaker, microphone, and mouse beats buying passive coolers and having hot hardware. I did that several years ago and now my PC is much quieter (0 db vs 39.5 db) than the author's effort.

  139. They're available but read the fine print... by jmichaelg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yeah, you can get fanless PSUs but watch out. TKpower's only delivers about 80 Watts sans fan. Neither it, nor the RSG RCP 300W-series fanless psu, are recommended for P4s. More here.

    Bottom line, no one that I am aware of has delivered a fanless psu that is recommended for the P4.

    Perhaps a psu engineer can comment on the following as I'm not sure I'm right. A psu running at 300W at 70% efficiency has to dump 30% of the 300W as heat. That's 90 watts that has to be gotten rid of - a lot to ask of a passively cooled psu. TKPower tries to do it by physically coupling their psu to the case.

  140. Quiet computing is not difficult! by badasscat · · Score: 1

    While "silent" computing is a panacea that may or may not be worth it in the end, "quiet" computing is not difficult at all and can result in perfectly acceptable system temps and plenty long life. I've never understood these people that run these 60mm Delta fans on their CPU's on these tiny little clip-on heat-sinks. Here are the secrets to quiet (not silent, but almost unnoticeable) yet stable and cool computing:

    1. A large, heavy CPU heatsink such as the Alpha PAL8045 (for an Athlon system - this is what I have for my XP1700+) - clip-ons need not apply. Real men BOLT their heat-sinks to their motherboards.

    2. A large fan for said heat-sink. 80mm minimum - 92mm if it'll fit in your system. Large fans can run at lower RPM's for a given amount of air exchange, thereby lowering the noise level. They also simply sound *different* even at the same RPM as smaller fans - the sound is lower in pitch and not as annoying. Preferably get one with either auto- or manual-adjusting fan speed - mine is manual so I can dial down the RPM's in winter.

    3. Remove the mobo chipset fan. I have been running with no chipset fan for more than a year with no instability problems at all (my computer simply does not crash, so I haven't even had crashes I may have misattributed to something else). Obviously, I do have a heatsink on there - but it's the stock heatsink the mobo came with (Abit KT7A).

    4. One large case fan - 92mm if it'll fit, otherwise 80mm. Again get one with adjustable RPM's. There's really no need to have more than 1 fan if you have a good PSU and a good case.

    5. Quiet PSU - I use an Enermax "whisper" model but as this article points out there are others that fit the bill just as well.

    6. Quiet hard drive - it is true that Seagate's Barracudas are by far the quietest around right now, and they don't cost any more than other drives. (FYI, the Barracuda V's are even quieter than the Barracuda IV used in this article, but you can't buy them quite yet, apparently.)

    And 7. (optional) If you're going to overclock your graphics card, use the stock HSF but make sure you take it off temporarily to apply a good, thin layer of thermal grease (most graphics card suppliers are pretty incompetent in this area). Also, if your card does not have heatsinks on the RAM, no hurt in adding some - they do help in RAM overclocking a bit and look cooler than bare chips. The point is, though, there's no point in using an aftermarket fan for overclocking - stock fans are generally fine and are usually pretty quiet.

    That's about it. My temps are very low, as is my noise level. This is a compromise I think anyone on either side of the performance/livability fence would be happy with. I previously tried a Delta fan on my CPU and I could not live with it for even 2 days - my current setup gives me the same temps with very little noise (I sleep in the same room as my PC, and even leave the PC on at night purposefully now - the quiet, low "whir" of the couple of fans I have actually helps me fall asleep). I don't have a decibel meter, but my current PC is no louder to me than my old P-200 from years ago.

    Oh, and BTW, my graphics card *is* overclocked with the near-silent stock fan it came with - again, no stability problems at all.

  141. closed headphones by xmnemonic · · Score: 1

    Closed headphones with a moderate amount of isolation (16dBa) get the job done for me...

  142. Fanless Power Supplys? by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing some sort of AC to DC power converters used in the small formfactors cases used by the Via C3 and what not...

    What's the chance of useing one of those here to reduce the noise even further?

    --
    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,
    but I want more then they offer"
  143. Not true: Its less than 20 times quieter by jelle · · Score: 2

    20 times sound level in decibels is 20*log(20)/log(10)=26.02dB.... 65-40dB is less than 26dB, so it's not well over twenty times quieter

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    1. Re:Not true: Its less than 20 times quieter by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      Its just under 20 times quieter by a fraction. You could've worked out that fraction instead and shown us how anal-retentive you are instead ...

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    2. Re:Not true: Its less than 20 times quieter by jelle · · Score: 2

      Anal retentive Mike? The /. introduction claims 'well over twenty times quieter'. It's not saying 'twenty times quieter', or even just 'over twenty times quieter', no, Jouster is so enthousiastic that he writes 'well over'. It's like calling a $890 TV having a price of well over a thousand dollars.

      "You could've worked out that fraction instead"

      Anyways, if you can't calculate, 25dB is 10^(25/20)=17.8 times quieter, much less than twenty, and definitely not well over twenty.

      What is this site turning into, news for people who cant calculate?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  144. Stuff and nonsense by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    I think he means that saying "20x quieter" is nonsensical.

    You should never say that something is "20x smaller" or "20x quieter". You can say "20x larger" or "20x louder".

    You can say that something is only "one twentieth as loud", though.

    Otherwise, you'd have -19 loudness units. :-)

    1. Re:Stuff and nonsense by Jouster · · Score: 2

      Er, perhaps, but wouldn't it be a wee bit stilted to say "one-twentieth as loud"? Not to mention that, instead of this discussion, we'd get one on whether "one-twentieth" is hyphenated or not.

      Ah well.

      Jouster
      (Story Author)

  145. This is a Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you Say "Amstrad"

  146. laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My laptop (ibook) is dead silent when theres no disk activity. I'm pretty sure that even if the macos can't be made to boot off a ram disk, linux could. How is this thing quieter than that?

  147. SunRay1, fan-free and disk-free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised Sun doesn't mention that their SunRay1 "Thin Client" (i.e. X terminal) systems are perfectly silent. They are fan-free and disk-free, with no motors whatsoever. I really appreciate having a lab in our math department with these silent machines (with large 1280x1024 LCD screens no less). See:
    http://www.sun.com/products/sunray/sunray1/i ndex.h tml

    Your design is appreciated, Sun! I also like the original Apple iBook design, which is fan-free albeit not disk-free. After upgrading to a disk drive with a fluid dynamic bearing motor, the loudest noises it makes is clicking from disk seeking. I'm talking about the original iBook design, not the current one. The current iBook design does include a cooling fan that comes on when necessary, which is too often, I understand.

  148. Heh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck's a boxen?
    Is that swedish for goat?

  149. apples and oranges, decibels and sones by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1
    3dB isn't a doubling in volume.

    ...in general 10db is considered to sound like "a doubling in volume"...


    The parent poster wasn't talking about power. Volume, or how loud something appears to the senses, is measured in sones. 1 sone approximately equals 10 dB though that varies with the frequency and magnitude of the sound.

    1. Re:apples and oranges, decibels and sones by nathanh · · Score: 2

      3dB isn't a doubling in volume.

      ...in general 10db is considered to sound like "a doubling in volume"...

      The parent poster wasn't talking about power. Volume, or how loud something appears to the senses, is measured in sones. 1 sone approximately equals 10 dB though that varies with the frequency and magnitude of the sound.

      Volume and loudness are not the same thing. Sones are a measure of loudness and is dependent on the frequency components. Volume is a measurement of intensity and it is typically measured in watts per square meter. A frequency at 3kHz will sound louder than a frequency at 5kHz even if they are played at the same volume because the human ear is more sensitive to the "voice" range. So 3dB is a doubling in volume no matter what the frequency, while 10dB is a doubling in loudness for a given frequency. Thus my comment that the parent poster typoed: he meant loudness where he wrote volume. It looks like 4 of you made the same mistake when you "corrected" me :-)

      But don't take my word for it. Good essay on sones and phons here

      http://www.me.psu.edu/lamancusa/me458/3_human.pdf

      And a description of volume here.

      http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/fs-1037/dir-039/_5840.h tm
    2. Re:apples and oranges, decibels and sones by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

      You're right. I was confusing loudness and volume like the parent poster, and then thought you were doing the same! Now that we know we've all been talking about the same damn thing I've got to ask: Who's on first again?

  150. Wow!! They created an IBM!!! by Hyped01 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is no major feat. This is so NOT a feat, that it's amazingly NOT one.

    I own 5 IBM Intellistation M Pro workstations (Netfinity Servers by another name). They are dual CPU beasts that support (mostly externally - only 6 internal bays) 29 SCSI (UW2) and 4 EIDE (ATA100). They contain 3 massive case fans, one massive power supply fans and the CPU fans.

    With the stock fans and a quiet hard drive, they are ungodly quiet. You can barely hear them with your ear on the case. With the stock drive, they are a little louder... a whopping 43 decibels with *2* XEON processors.

    With a well selected drive and CPU fans (only 1 was the stock IBM fan so I had to find a silent one for the 2nd CPU), it drops below the 40 mark at 1.5 feet distance.

    Oh... and just for those disbelievers, here's the pdf's to the manuals for the slightly louder of the Intellistations (I have 3 models... but this is the only one I could find online...)

    M Pro

    - Rob

    --

    WebMaster:
    BinFeeds
    XXX Thumbnailed Image Newsgroups but

    1. Re:Wow!! They created an IBM!!! by Kidbro · · Score: 2

      Oh... and just for those disbelievers, here's the pdf's to the manuals for the slightly louder of the Intellistations

      Nope:


      HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:45:25 GMT
      Server: Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) PHP/4.0.6
      Connection: close
      Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1

      404 Not Found

      Not Found
      The requested URL /library/dokumentacja/6889uypc.pdf was not found on this server.

      Apache/1.3.22 Server at www.asso.pl Port 80

  151. one time quieter by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

    Why wouldn't "one time quieter" be equivalent to "one time louder". I'd take either one to mean "just as loud as before" i.e. n X 1 = n.

    1. Re:one time quieter by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1
      My reasoning:
      noise N = 50dB (or whatever)
      50db one time = 50dB
      Ergo one time quieter = 50dB quieter = 0dB
      Twenty times quieter is therefore a negative sound source, sucking in noise


      Anyway it's not that important. If you're right and I'm wrong I won't lose any sleep.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  152. Fans by fegu · · Score: 1

    I don't see how few fans are an advantage. We are always trying to give Linux more fans, in fact I think Linux has more fans here than the iMac ever will have.

    --
    "There is no substitute for thinking" - Bjarne Stroustrup