Just for the heck if it, I downloaded it friday afternoon, and compiled it on a RH 5.1 box. Seems to be fine, unlike some software these days that demand the latest and greatest libraries or compilers.
Japanese society is more repressive than the US society, and manga/anime provides an escape. Small living spaces, crowded public places, and a rigid society.
Of course, it being cheap, sized perfectly for a commuter, and published weekly doesn't hurt.
-MDL
Who is happy that "One Piece" is being printed in Shonen Jump
You are taxed for earning and you are taxed for spending and you are taxed for saving
And don't forget, when you die, your heirs may have to pay taxes on what you leave them, even though you have already paid taxes on it. So you are taxed for dying:).
Abit has put out some of the better MOBOs out there. And they have the honesty to admit to the problem, as opposed to the companies who sent their lawyers after Gary Headlee for posting a list of MOBOs that he has replaced the capacitors on.
While the serial format has alot of good things going for it, what has to be done is creating a plotline that gets you from point A to B. Otherwise you end up with drawn out neverending soap opera like shows. While subplots are fine, they should not end up becoming the main focus.
When I started in Engineering at Michigan back in 1973, we were told that half of the freshman engineering class would be gone by junior year. They would drop out, transfer to another school, or switch majors. I met very few who would switch from a liberal arts degree to engineering.
I remember my NA 201 midterms. After the exam, I felt like throwing my calculator down the stairwell because I knew I had done so badly. Turns out I got a 46%, second highest in the class.
-MDL
Who used a slide rule as a freshman in college.
Re:Forgive the obvious question...
on
Superbowl XXXVII
·
· Score: 1
As a huge fan of soccer, i can understand why the majority of americans don't grasp it as a spectacular sport. In 90 minutes it is possible to not have a team score a single point and still be one of the best games in history.
While you can have a great game in many sports with a final score of 0-0 (except maybe basketball:)), there are too many soccer games that end up in ties when there was a clearly superior team. And the practice of attempting to break a tie using penalty kicks is an insult to the rest of the game.
You must WIN and you must SCORE in america. It is reflected in society.
Sorry, but winning is just as important in the rest of the world. Just look at the Olympics or the soccer world cup. And to win in many sports, you do have to score.
-MDL, who watches about 50 soccer games a year.
They might as well have an ass picking class, or a class on boogers. Be just as usefull.
Well, there are plenty of classes at most colleges and universities that you could say that about. Considering the cost of college these days, many programs could cut their non-essential requirements down, reducing the stay to three years.
Some will argue that you will end up not getting as well rounded education; but for many that is an expensive luxury.
-MDL
Whose favorite college course was a one credit class in IBM 360 assembly language, where we used punch cards to submit our jobs.
Most episodes he has to clean the bathroom, and starts thinking about that episodes babe using the toilet as he scrubs it. Weird but really funny.
-MDL
Re:Stop the mindless Microsoft bashing...
on
Assorted CES Gizmos
·
· Score: 1
I think one of the reasons that it is getting bashed so hard is that was called "whole new product concept that was completely incubated by Microsoft Research", while it seems to be a rehash of past and existing technologies. Quite a few people are tired of Microsoft's claims of "Innovation", where much of their products were originally started by someone else, or were originally an immitation of a competitors product.
As far as the Linux watch goes, it was interesting because IBM did it, and had quite a few capabilities (including bluetooth in it's later versions), and came out almost three years ago.
But somehow, it comes from Microsoft, and it's crap. Whatever. Universal access to personally relevant data, tuned directly to my needs and priorities, without needing to worry about yet another gadget to throw in my pocket and/or recharge -- this is cool sh*t, folks!
You'll have to recharge the watch. And since some PDAs and moble phones already have this capability, for some it *is* another gaget to drag around.
(1) If I say something must have a cause, it has a cause.
(2) I say the universe must have a cause.
(3) Therefore, the universe has a cause.
(4) Therefore, God exists.
ROTFL. Thanks for posting this - best laugh I've had all morning.
However, comparing evolution to coin tossing would be like someone that tossed the coin a few billion or more times and had it come up heads every time.
Since evolution is non-directed (ie, not trying for a pre-determined specific target), a better example is this:
Flip a coin 100 times. Record the results. The chance of flipping coins in that exact order is 2^100. While the probability of doing coin flips and getting that exact result is near zero, it did happen.
Instead, your example would be ok for someone trying to repeat the steps that evolution had taken.
Your post implying random chance reminds me of the old coin flip trick:
Flip a coin 100 times. Write down the results of each flip. Now, the odds of that happening in that exact order is 1:2^100, or 1:1.26765e+30. Must be a miracle!:)
Assuming that there may be potentially billions of planets out there, and with billions of years to work with, there may be enough planets with enviroments sufficently adequate, and enough time, for life to begin.
God interrupted and said "Wait a minute. That is My dirt and water. Go create your own."
Of course, this brings up the question, "Who created God?".
I usually get the lame response along the lines of "He has always been". How do you know? "He said so". Where did he say that? "In the Bible". But wasn't it written by a bunch of nomadic herdsmen? "Yes, but they were inspired by God". How do you know that? "The Bible says so".
And you think evolution is more unbeliveable than creationism?
The idea of the "Great Flood" being a worldwide flood was disproven two centuries ago.
-MDL
Re:Questions evolutionists don't want to answer
on
Shapes of Time
·
· Score: 1
Which does not contradict a world where a set of animals was intially created by God, and then evolved over time from that starting point. The difference is only in seeing it as common descent or as descent from a number of common ancestors.
Of course, if god created a certain group of animals, and then let them evolve, then when? We know that life existed hundreds of millions of years ago, and the fossil record shows the gradual evolution of creatures from 600 million years ago (or more) to now.
Then show me a single example which works when Genesis is assumed true. All the "contradictions" I've seen people claim fall apart unless you already assume Genesis is false. Or in other words, the contradictions are easily explained if Genesis is both interpreted literally AND taken as truth.
* Day 3: Plants
* Day 5: Sea animals and flying animals
* Day 6: Land animals, then humanity (both sexes)
Genesis 2:
* The first man (Adam)
* Plants
* Animals (both land and air)
* The first woman (Eve)
Now, the above is trivial compared with taking Genesis as true. The best example is Noah's flood. While there may have been a localized flood, a literal reading of Genesis requires that it was a worldwide flood. Two hundred years ago, a number of Christian geologists wanted to prove to the rest of the world that the flood in the bible did happen (i.e. initial assumption that Genesis was true); they found overwhelming evidence that a worldwide flood never happened.
I'll have to admit that the worldwide flood is a curious story - while the story is told of god saving Noah, his family, and a group of animals as a positive story, it really is a story of mass premeditated genocide on a global scale.
Well, I've usually been able to run a newer generation kernel on a given distro - as an example, with redhat 5.1, it came with the Linux 2.0.x kernel; I'm using 2.2.18 with it (long story). And I'm running 2.4.18 on systems running a Linux 2.2.x based distro.
With Linux, you can often upgrade certain components without having to upgrade the whole system. That's a huge advantage.
-MDL
Re:Questions evolutionists don't want to answer
on
Shapes of Time
·
· Score: 1
The fossil record and DNA evidence combined show only that animals have similar structures, and the more similar the animal, the more similar the structures(which is kind of by definition). DNA can be considered evidence for common descent, but that does not mean common descent is the only explanation for DNA.
The fossil record also shows that at a given time; a certain type of animal existed; and at a later point in time, a similar but different type of animal existed. As an example, look at the evolution of the horse. . As far as DNA goes, one could argue that two animals that have similar physical characteristics should have similar DNA without having common descent. But their having similar "JUNK" DNA makes it near impossible to refute common descent.
The combined evidence of DNA and the fossil record in NO WAY contradict a belief in a world created as Genesis literally describes.
Well, if you take Genesis literally, not only does it contradict biological evolution, but astronomy, geology, physics, and even itself.
I agree alot of people on talk-origins push this as a scientific belief, which it of course is not. That doesn't mean however that the belief is contrary to scientific evidence.
If you take the bible literally, it contradicts scientific evidence in many disiplines. But there are many mainstream Christian denominations that have no problem with evolution and the theory of evolution.
Re:sigh .. there is no such thing as "macroevoluti
on
Shapes of Time
·
· Score: 1
Rational people can however still find it improbable that the whole of diversity on Earth came about purely through micro evolution and natural selection, or other purely natural processes.
Even though the fossil record and DNA analysis provide excellent evidence that the species are related.
There are still alot of BIG hurdles to get over before we can even prove that it's biologically possible for all species to have evoloved from a common ancestor(s).
Well, nothing is ever *proven* in science - just given overwhelming support. And no, there are no big hurdles about it being biologically possible for all species to have evolved from a common ancestor. Again, the fossil record and DNA do a very nice job.
Just because someone has a non-scientific opinion, does not mean they are ignorant, let alone a fundamentalist.
But if they try to claim that their non-scientific opinion is scientific, then they are either ignorant or lying. And as far as fundamentalists go, if you ever would read the usenet newsgroup talk.origins, you would see that those who object to evolution are overwhelmingly people who identify themselves as fundamentalists.
From owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Wed Mar 8 04:18:06 1995 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by vger.rutgers.edu (8.6.10/8.6.10) id VAA06388 for linux-kernel-outgoing; Tue, 7 Mar 1995 21:36:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Mar 1995 18:13:07 +0200 From: Linus Torvalds Message-Id: X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.0 10/31/90) To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu (linux-kernel) Subject: Linux'95 final release Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Precedence: bulk
Ok, the final release of Linux'95, also known among those in the know as "v1.2.0" is now out. After the extensive beta-release-period, Linux'95 is reality.
Before you get Linux'95, I'd like to outline the Licensing stuff, and remind you that copyright infringement is a crime.
Linux'95 has several types of licenses, including, but not limited, to:
* End-User License Agreement - Applications
This is an application-specific license, which is intended for a single application running on your Linux'95-authorized computer. The license agreement rules differ depending on the application. See appendix 'H'.
* End-User License Agreement - Systems
This agreement is intended for singe system product use, such as the Linux'95 kernel license. It's important to note that the Systems product licenses do not permit concurrent, or second copies. There is a special Multi-License upgrade program for those that want to start out with a single license but later expand their setup.
* Multi-License Pak
This agreement is intended for sites with multiple systems, which want to run multiple copies of the Linux'95 system concurrently and/or on several machines. This license is available as a 10, 50 or 100-unit license depending on the size of your installation.
* Logo License
This agreement is intended for hardware and software vendors wishing to show that their product is Linux'95-aware, and has special features taking advantage of the Linux'95 environment.
* Linux'95 Stamp of Approval
This stamp of approval is available for systems that have been certified at our extensive testing facility as being able to run the Linux'95 system.
* The "I've got too much money" License
Contact us for details on this exclusive licensing deal, we'll work something out. Please contact "ivemoney@linux.Helsinki.FI" directly.
Large institutions that want to possibly combine several licenses can do so, with a standard licensing fee reduction. Please contact our licensing department for further details.
End-User License Agreement - Systems (EULAS)
This license allows full use of the Linux'95 base system on a single computer or workstation. Any number of people can use that single system, but only one at a time. This is the license of choice for stand-alone systems, or for secure installations with a very restrictive network connection.
EULAS allows making and unlimited number of backup copies, and allows further distribution of the system under the terms of the GPL. Please see appendix 'G' for further details of the GPL.
Multi-License Pak - MPAK
MPAK offers you all of the Linux'95 single system License, while also allowing you to extend the use of Linux'95 to multiple systems and/or multiple users concurrently on a single system. Thus your Linux'95 system can become a full departemental mail server, or act as a internet gateway to the rest of the world.
Like the single-user license, the MPAK license allows further distribution of Linux'95 copies according to the GPL.
Logo License and Stamp of Approval
The exclusive Linux'95 License and Stamp of Approval can be used to show that your hardware and/or software is not limited to the more primitive systems available today, but is able to run the full Linux'95 system. To apply for a Logo License, you must show that your product does indeed work under Linux'95, and uses any of the extensive Linux'95 environment services (see also: Stevens, Advanced Unix Programming).
The Linux'95 Stamp of Approval requires that your product has gone through the rigorous compatibility testing at LT-labs. To ensure that your product continues to be compatible even with new versions of the Linux'95 system, you are also advised not to expect it back ("we got it, and we ain't giving it back").
The DEC AlphaPC 2000/300 is currently under extensive Stamp of Approval testing. Other hardware manufacturers, please contact out hardware department at "hardware@linux.helsinki.fi".
How to Apply for a License
To actually apply for the licenses, please find the nearest Linux'95 distributor. The official Linux'95 kernel distribution is available at 'ftp://ftp.cs.helsinki.fi/pub/Software/Linux/K erne l/v1.2' and at 'ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/OS/Linux/PEOPLE/Linus/v1.2 '. Other suppliers are expected to pick it up within days.
After having aquired the Linux'95 distribution, you will have automatically applied for a single-user license (the distribution outlets will do all the necessary paperwork for you, no need to fill in registration forms). When you expand the license, the revolutionary "Linux'95 Auto-Licensing" software will automatically send in a expanded license request and deduct the licensing fee from your bank account.
To apply for the Stamp of Approval, please contact our Approval department electronically at "approval@linux.Helsinki.FI" for further details.
Why do I want to upgrade?
The beta-testers of Linux'95 can upgrade to the final Linux'95 from their current setup for no extra licensing fees by applying the "v1.1.95-1.2.0.patch.gz" system-specific patch set. That patch set mainly corrects a few cosmetic problems with the beta-version of Linux'95, namely spelling. It also modifies the behaviour of a few system-specific undocumented features.
Users of the older Linux'94 system release (aka 1.0.9) will find the extensive new features of Linux'95 a new exciting world of wonder. Our beta-testing community has extensively tested the new features, while at the same time ensuring full backwards compatibility with most major software packages. Updated versions for packages that have broken are available at all major Linux sites.
The only difference being that Sakura was aired at around midnight in Japan, and actually was geared towards perverted college students like me from the get-go.
CCS for perverts? I think not! Despite the short skirts on the school uniforms, there is not a *single* panty shot in all of the 70 episodes and two movies.
Slashdot Mirror
-MDL
And Spirited Away made even more than Titanic in Japan.
Of course, it being cheap, sized perfectly for a commuter, and published weekly doesn't hurt.
-MDL
Who is happy that "One Piece" is being printed in Shonen Jump
BTW, my copy of the Back to the Future Trilogy has the packaging done in french and english. But, hey, for $30.81 (US) including shipping, that's ok.
-MDL
And don't forget, when you die, your heirs may have to pay taxes on what you leave them, even though you have already paid taxes on it. So you are taxed for dying :).
-MDL
But I guess I'll keep my BH6's for a while :).
-MDL
-MDL
I remember my NA 201 midterms. After the exam, I felt like throwing my calculator down the stairwell because I knew I had done so badly. Turns out I got a 46%, second highest in the class.
-MDL
Who used a slide rule as a freshman in college.
While you can have a great game in many sports with a final score of 0-0 (except maybe basketball:)), there are too many soccer games that end up in ties when there was a clearly superior team. And the practice of attempting to break a tie using penalty kicks is an insult to the rest of the game.
You must WIN and you must SCORE in america. It is reflected in society.
Sorry, but winning is just as important in the rest of the world. Just look at the Olympics or the soccer world cup. And to win in many sports, you do have to score. -MDL, who watches about 50 soccer games a year.
Well, there are plenty of classes at most colleges and universities that you could say that about. Considering the cost of college these days, many programs could cut their non-essential requirements down, reducing the stay to three years.
Some will argue that you will end up not getting as well rounded education; but for many that is an expensive luxury.
-MDL
Whose favorite college course was a one credit class in IBM 360 assembly language, where we used punch cards to submit our jobs.
Golden Boy has *real* toilet humor :).
Most episodes he has to clean the bathroom, and starts thinking about that episodes babe using the toilet as he scrubs it. Weird but really funny.
-MDL
As far as the Linux watch goes, it was interesting because IBM did it, and had quite a few capabilities (including bluetooth in it's later versions), and came out almost three years ago.
But somehow, it comes from Microsoft, and it's crap. Whatever. Universal access to personally relevant data, tuned directly to my needs and priorities, without needing to worry about yet another gadget to throw in my pocket and/or recharge -- this is cool sh*t, folks!
You'll have to recharge the watch. And since some PDAs and moble phones already have this capability, for some it *is* another gaget to drag around.
-MDL
-MDL
(1) If I say something must have a cause, it has a cause. (2) I say the universe must have a cause. (3) Therefore, the universe has a cause. (4) Therefore, God exists.
ROTFL. Thanks for posting this - best laugh I've had all morning.
-MDL
Since evolution is non-directed (ie, not trying for a pre-determined specific target), a better example is this:
Flip a coin 100 times. Record the results. The chance of flipping coins in that exact order is 2^100. While the probability of doing coin flips and getting that exact result is near zero, it did happen.
Instead, your example would be ok for someone trying to repeat the steps that evolution had taken.
-MDL
Flip a coin 100 times. Write down the results of each flip. Now, the odds of that happening in that exact order is 1:2^100, or 1:1.26765e+30. Must be a miracle! :)
Assuming that there may be potentially billions of planets out there, and with billions of years to work with, there may be enough planets with enviroments sufficently adequate, and enough time, for life to begin.
-MDL
Of course, this brings up the question, "Who created God?".
I usually get the lame response along the lines of "He has always been". How do you know? "He said so". Where did he say that? "In the Bible". But wasn't it written by a bunch of nomadic herdsmen? "Yes, but they were inspired by God". How do you know that? "The Bible says so".
And you think evolution is more unbeliveable than creationism?
-MDL
Interesting. The more I pondered religion, the less I wanted to have anything to do with it.
-MDL
-MDL
Of course, if god created a certain group of animals, and then let them evolve, then when? We know that life existed hundreds of millions of years ago, and the fossil record shows the gradual evolution of creatures from 600 million years ago (or more) to now.
Then show me a single example which works when Genesis is assumed true. All the "contradictions" I've seen people claim fall apart unless you already assume Genesis is false. Or in other words, the contradictions are easily explained if Genesis is both interpreted literally AND taken as truth.
Heck, Genesis can't even decide which order things were created between Genesis 1 and 2.
Genesis 1:
* Day 3: Plants
* Day 5: Sea animals and flying animals
* Day 6: Land animals, then humanity (both sexes)
Genesis 2:
* The first man (Adam)
* Plants
* Animals (both land and air)
* The first woman (Eve)
Now, the above is trivial compared with taking Genesis as true. The best example is Noah's flood. While there may have been a localized flood, a literal reading of Genesis requires that it was a worldwide flood. Two hundred years ago, a number of Christian geologists wanted to prove to the rest of the world that the flood in the bible did happen (i.e. initial assumption that Genesis was true); they found overwhelming evidence that a worldwide flood never happened.
I'll have to admit that the worldwide flood is a curious story - while the story is told of god saving Noah, his family, and a group of animals as a positive story, it really is a story of mass premeditated genocide on a global scale.
-MDL
With Linux, you can often upgrade certain components without having to upgrade the whole system. That's a huge advantage.
-MDL
The fossil record also shows that at a given time; a certain type of animal existed; and at a later point in time, a similar but different type of animal existed. As an example, look at the evolution of the horse. . As far as DNA goes, one could argue that two animals that have similar physical characteristics should have similar DNA without having common descent. But their having similar "JUNK" DNA makes it near impossible to refute common descent.
The combined evidence of DNA and the fossil record in NO WAY contradict a belief in a world created as Genesis literally describes.
Well, if you take Genesis literally, not only does it contradict biological evolution, but astronomy, geology, physics, and even itself.
I agree alot of people on talk-origins push this as a scientific belief, which it of course is not. That doesn't mean however that the belief is contrary to scientific evidence.
If you take the bible literally, it contradicts scientific evidence in many disiplines. But there are many mainstream Christian denominations that have no problem with evolution and the theory of evolution.
Even though the fossil record and DNA analysis provide excellent evidence that the species are related.
There are still alot of BIG hurdles to get over before we can even prove that it's biologically possible for all species to have evoloved from a common ancestor(s).
Well, nothing is ever *proven* in science - just given overwhelming support. And no, there are no big hurdles about it being biologically possible for all species to have evolved from a common ancestor. Again, the fossil record and DNA do a very nice job.
Just because someone has a non-scientific opinion, does not mean they are ignorant, let alone a fundamentalist.
But if they try to claim that their non-scientific opinion is scientific, then they are either ignorant or lying. And as far as fundamentalists go, if you ever would read the usenet newsgroup talk.origins, you would see that those who object to evolution are overwhelmingly people who identify themselves as fundamentalists.
-MDL
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by vger.rutgers.edu (8.6.10/8.6.10) id VAA06388 for linux-kernel-outgoing; Tue, 7 Mar 1995 21:36:26 -0500
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 1995 18:13:07 +0200
From: Linus Torvalds
Message-Id:
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.0 10/31/90)
To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu (linux-kernel)
Subject: Linux'95 final release
Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk
Ok, the final release of Linux'95, also known among those in the know as "v1.2.0" is now out. After the extensive beta-release-period, Linux'95 is reality.
Before you get Linux'95, I'd like to outline the Licensing stuff, and remind you that copyright infringement is a crime.
Linux'95 has several types of licenses, including, but not limited, to:
* End-User License Agreement - Applications
This is an application-specific license, which is intended for a single application running on your Linux'95-authorized computer. The license agreement rules differ depending on the application. See appendix 'H'.
* End-User License Agreement - Systems
This agreement is intended for singe system product use, such as the Linux'95 kernel license. It's important to note that the Systems product licenses do not permit concurrent, or second copies. There is a special Multi-License upgrade program for those that want to start out with a single license but later expand their setup.
* Multi-License Pak
This agreement is intended for sites with multiple systems, which want to run multiple copies of the Linux'95 system concurrently and/or on several machines. This license is available as a 10, 50 or 100-unit license depending on the size of your installation.
* Logo License
This agreement is intended for hardware and software vendors wishing to show that their product is Linux'95-aware, and has special features taking advantage of the Linux'95 environment.
* Linux'95 Stamp of Approval
This stamp of approval is available for systems that have been certified at our extensive testing facility as being able to run the Linux'95 system.
* The "I've got too much money" License
Contact us for details on this exclusive licensing deal, we'll work something out. Please contact "ivemoney@linux.Helsinki.FI" directly.
Large institutions that want to possibly combine several licenses can do so, with a standard licensing fee reduction. Please contact our licensing department for further details.
End-User License Agreement - Systems (EULAS)
This license allows full use of the Linux'95 base system on a single computer or workstation. Any number of people can use that single system, but only one at a time. This is the license of choice for stand-alone systems, or for secure installations with a very restrictive network connection.
EULAS allows making and unlimited number of backup copies, and allows further distribution of the system under the terms of the GPL. Please see appendix 'G' for further details of the GPL.
Multi-License Pak - MPAK
MPAK offers you all of the Linux'95 single system License, while also allowing you to extend the use of Linux'95 to multiple systems and/or multiple users concurrently on a single system. Thus your Linux'95 system can become a full departemental mail server, or act as a internet gateway to the rest of the world.
Like the single-user license, the MPAK license allows further distribution of Linux'95 copies according to the GPL.
Logo License and Stamp of Approval
The exclusive Linux'95 License and Stamp of Approval can be used to show that your hardware and/or software is not limited to the more primitive systems available today, but is able to run the full Linux'95 system. To apply for a Logo License, you must show that your product does indeed work under Linux'95, and uses any of the extensive Linux'95 environment services (see also: Stevens, Advanced Unix Programming).
The Linux'95 Stamp of Approval requires that your product has gone through the rigorous compatibility testing at LT-labs. To ensure that your product continues to be compatible even with new versions of the Linux'95 system, you are also advised not to expect it back ("we got it, and we ain't giving it back").
The DEC AlphaPC 2000/300 is currently under extensive Stamp of Approval testing. Other hardware manufacturers, please contact out hardware department at "hardware@linux.helsinki.fi".
How to Apply for a License
To actually apply for the licenses, please find the nearest Linux'95 distributor. The official Linux'95 kernel distribution is available atK erne l/v1.2' and at 'ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/OS/Linux/PEOPLE/Linus/v1.2 '. Other suppliers are expected to pick it up within days.
'ftp://ftp.cs.helsinki.fi/pub/Software/Linux/
After having aquired the Linux'95 distribution, you will have automatically applied for a single-user license (the distribution outlets will do all the necessary paperwork for you, no need to fill in registration forms). When you expand the license, the revolutionary "Linux'95 Auto-Licensing" software will automatically send in a expanded license request and deduct the licensing fee from your bank account.
To apply for the Stamp of Approval, please contact our Approval department electronically at "approval@linux.Helsinki.FI" for further details.
Why do I want to upgrade?
The beta-testers of Linux'95 can upgrade to the final Linux'95 from their current setup for no extra licensing fees by applying the "v1.1.95-1.2.0.patch.gz" system-specific patch set. That patch set mainly corrects a few cosmetic problems with the beta-version of Linux'95, namely spelling. It also modifies the behaviour of a few system-specific undocumented features.
Users of the older Linux'94 system release (aka 1.0.9) will find the extensive new features of Linux'95 a new exciting world of wonder. Our
beta-testing community has extensively tested the new features, while at the same time ensuring full backwards compatibility with most major
software packages. Updated versions for packages that have broken are available at all major Linux sites.
We thank you for using Linux'95,
Linus
CCS for perverts? I think not! Despite the short skirts on the school uniforms, there is not a *single* panty shot in all of the 70 episodes and two movies.
-MDL