A fossil of the exact common ancestor at the exact point these two particular lines diverged? Probably not. However, there is plenty of evidence of a tree of life branching from an original organism. Airplane and oxcarts are tools designed by a highly intelligent tool-making species. I won't respond again, but if you really want to get a basis of understanding of the evidence for evolution, spend a lot of time on talkorigins.org.
Dogs and cats had a common ancestor. One did not evolve from the other, so there would not be an intermediary. But why am I even bothering with you? You're intellectually lost.
Why the heck couldn't it be a stripped down OS X on ARM. It's just a matter of compiling the bits they need for ARM. Darwin should be pretty damn portable, just like Linux. Your that it isn't OS X just because it isn't running on x86 or PPC is flawed.
Yes, I have. I converted it from pdf to jpeg for Spocko. It's legit. I'd give you the text, but that's up to Spocko. By the way if anyone can help Dr. Spocko with some technical aspects of moving to a new host, email him at spockosemail@gmail.com
Re:Considering their general SoftEng incompetence.
on
Premiere Back on Mac
·
· Score: 1
Uh, yeah. Photoshop. Illustrator. InDesign. A monkey could have programmed these, right?
I agree with you in principle. However, since Apple is nowhere near in danger of monopolizing the PC market, and because the move to Intel removes the problem of Apple's sources of hardware supplies drying up, I don't think the single-vendor aguement in this case would be a real threat to an organization. The problem for a business using OS X would start the day the company wanted to run Business Objects, a web-based app that requires IE, etc.
Corporations don't use OS X because business app vendors don't write software for it. Otherwise we in corporations would deploy the shit out of OS X. It has nothing to do with the quality of OS X.
Slashdot Mirror
I protest! She is wasting precious oxygen paid for by you the taxpayer.
A fossil of the exact common ancestor at the exact point these two particular lines diverged? Probably not. However, there is plenty of evidence of a tree of life branching from an original organism. Airplane and oxcarts are tools designed by a highly intelligent tool-making species. I won't respond again, but if you really want to get a basis of understanding of the evidence for evolution, spend a lot of time on talkorigins.org.
Acutally, I don't observe Tuesday, which causes no end of trouble when I try to plan meetings in Outlook.
I used to believe in Genesis. That is, until Phil Collins sold out to do Michelob ads.
Dogs and cats had a common ancestor. One did not evolve from the other, so there would not be an intermediary. But why am I even bothering with you? You're intellectually lost.
Would you eat them poached or fried? Would you eat them crucified?
A Beowulf cluster of these things couldn't upstage the iPhone.
Stole mine too. I even had the same number of A's.
It's time to simply ignore the flat-earthers and continue our scientific and humanistic voyage into the future.
...since the 23 Zune owners worldwide are probably having a hard time finding eachother anyway.
Just because I downloaded IE7 doesn't mean I use it any more than I have to.
How will I feed my children?
This could seriously affect both of the guys using Netscape.
Yes, I did. The iPhone interface makes use of Core Video. That's pretty high level and meaningful, don't you think?
Typo, meant to say "your logic that", not "your that".
Why the heck couldn't it be a stripped down OS X on ARM. It's just a matter of compiling the bits they need for ARM. Darwin should be pretty damn portable, just like Linux. Your that it isn't OS X just because it isn't running on x86 or PPC is flawed.
Yes, I have. I converted it from pdf to jpeg for Spocko. It's legit. I'd give you the text, but that's up to Spocko. By the way if anyone can help Dr. Spocko with some technical aspects of moving to a new host, email him at spockosemail@gmail.com
Uh, yeah. Photoshop. Illustrator. InDesign. A monkey could have programmed these, right?
He's not, but you clearly are.
Yes, but the pervious versions were great for editing porn.
I RTFA and it said this was the final update to Amiga 4.0, originally release in May 2004.
I agree with you in principle. However, since Apple is nowhere near in danger of monopolizing the PC market, and because the move to Intel removes the problem of Apple's sources of hardware supplies drying up, I don't think the single-vendor aguement in this case would be a real threat to an organization. The problem for a business using OS X would start the day the company wanted to run Business Objects, a web-based app that requires IE, etc.
Exactly. It's a chicken-and-egg problem. That's why Apple isn't even trying for that market.
Corporations don't use OS X because business app vendors don't write software for it. Otherwise we in corporations would deploy the shit out of OS X. It has nothing to do with the quality of OS X.
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28331 I still have Jarts from the 70s at my grandma's house, by the way. And they're still fun.