Nobody wants control of your life, fuckass, we just want you to acknowledge there's a problem and maybe choose to alter your consumption habits a bit. Dick.
Are we to understand that it was the people in Bush's white house that failed, and not "the gubbermint"? Nonsense and tosh! If people are the root cause of government's failures then the party of "government sucks" has some mirror-gazing to do.
Dead trees and harvested forest land release lots of CO2 from decaying root structures and the associated fungal colonies. It is always preferable to leave the forest where it is.
This is why the government shouldn't be allowed any more money than is needed to keep the lights on in the capitol, they always fuck things up! When will people learn to temper their bigoted distrust of the free market and private enterprise?
I was picked on in public middle school and found school administrators weren't starry eyed liberal statists wishing for fluffy bunnies so much as they were underachieving incompetents who wanted to spend as little time as possible mediating incidents between students.
I went the private school route after that, and only once did I have to choke someone who was fucking with me. Believe me, there were plenty of liberals in the administration and they managed to achieve something closer to a school where everyone gets along without advocating that their students resort to violence (of course, a large part of that is the ability to pick and choose who gets to attend the school).
Just because determining whether a program will ever stop doesn't fit the model as we can understand it doesn't mean that it doesn't or cannot occur. We should stop dismissing ideas of computer science simply because they don't fit with what we believe should happen. It is entirely plausible that you can solve the halting problem but cannot mathematically explain how - but because we cannot fully explain how it should not be dismissed.
The system basically worked here, the offended party was able to use the system to address his grievance. Let's not forget that for all our bluster about liberty and freedom there are some places where a real politically-motivated detainment could have meant death or worse.
Your backwards-ass country probably doesn't have a Free Market, that's why. Go read some Rand, scrub.
Nobody wants control of your life, fuckass, we just want you to acknowledge there's a problem and maybe choose to alter your consumption habits a bit. Dick.
Right, so are you describing a feature of government, or of people?
Sure, but that applies just as well to rapists, murderers, and investment bankers.
Who's defending the Democrats? I'm challenging the notion that "government" is more prone to corruption and incompetence than "people" in general..
Are we to understand that it was the people in Bush's white house that failed, and not "the gubbermint"? Nonsense and tosh! If people are the root cause of government's failures then the party of "government sucks" has some mirror-gazing to do.
Dead trees and harvested forest land release lots of CO2 from decaying root structures and the associated fungal colonies. It is always preferable to leave the forest where it is.
The carbon is only sequestered as long as the tree is alive.
for Sarah Palin
Wow, thanks for that keen insight into government! Maybe next you can give us a one-line treatise on the irrelevance of unions.
This is why the government shouldn't be allowed any more money than is needed to keep the lights on in the capitol, they always fuck things up! When will people learn to temper their bigoted distrust of the free market and private enterprise?
I was picked on in public middle school and found school administrators weren't starry eyed liberal statists wishing for fluffy bunnies so much as they were underachieving incompetents who wanted to spend as little time as possible mediating incidents between students.
I went the private school route after that, and only once did I have to choke someone who was fucking with me. Believe me, there were plenty of liberals in the administration and they managed to achieve something closer to a school where everyone gets along without advocating that their students resort to violence (of course, a large part of that is the ability to pick and choose who gets to attend the school).
Welcome to the Republican party
Hey, three out of three ain't bad!
Nonsense and tosh! That doesn't sound like something the founding fathers would have done. What have your liberal history professors been telling you?
Just because determining whether a program will ever stop doesn't fit the model as we can understand it doesn't mean that it doesn't or cannot occur. We should stop dismissing ideas of computer science simply because they don't fit with what we believe should happen. It is entirely plausible that you can solve the halting problem but cannot mathematically explain how - but because we cannot fully explain how it should not be dismissed.
Looks like Big Government screwed up again, should have gone with the private sector!
If you think climate science is important and want to know more about it maybe you should spend some time GOING TO FUCKING SCHOOL.
Good thing the government is inept and everything they do is an unmitigated failure!
No, they'd rather huff and puff about big gubbermint and how since they never go to the library they shouldn't have to pay taxes.
This is retarded. You are retarded.
It worked insofar as nobody threatened to use their guns, which is a pretty good outcome where libertarians and government agents are concerned.
Well I can't argue with that logic!
The system basically worked here, the offended party was able to use the system to address his grievance. Let's not forget that for all our bluster about liberty and freedom there are some places where a real politically-motivated detainment could have meant death or worse.
Too true; the same logic has been used to cast things like the free market, republicans, and the catholic church as beyond reproach.