Slashdot Mirror


Software Piracy At the Workplace?

An anonymous reader writes "What does one do when a good portion of the application software at your workplace is pirated? Bringing this up did not endear me at all to the president of the company. I was given a flat 'We don't pirate software,' and 'We must have paid for it at some point.' Given that I was only able to find one burnt copy of Office Pro with a Google-able CD-Key, and that version of Office is on at least 20 computers, I'm not convinced. Some of the legit software in the company has been installed on more than one computer, such as Adobe Acrobat. Nevertheless I have been called on to install dubious software on multiple occasions. As for shareware, what strategies do you use to convince management to allow the purchase of commonly used utilities? If an installation of WinZip reports thousands of uses, I think the software developer deserves a bit o' coin for it. When I told management that WinZip has a timeout counter that counts off one second per file previously opened, they tried to implement a policy of wait for it, do something else, and come back later, rather than spend the money. Also, some software is free for home and educational use only, like AVG Free. What do you when management ignores this?"

1,006 comments

  1. Bide your time by Dunkirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do what you're told. Look for another job.

    --
    Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    1. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do what you're told. Look for another job.

      Be a good little wage slave and don't get uppity and challenge your masters until you find new masters. Or call the BSA. Of course if you're going to do that, better not to identify yourself by bringing your concern to management first.

    2. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, if you don't like it, get another job. But I promise you won't get far up the corporate ladder with the do-good attitude you've got. Even though it's technically right, you gotta play by their rules, or find somebody who plays by yours.

    3. Re:Bide your time by precariousgray · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't forget to call the police when you do find a new job, to slap them with a great-big I-told-you-so.

      --
      not much, just being forced to manually insert line breaks into my comment
    4. Re:Bide your time by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry but thats pretty crappy advice. He should be recommending free alternatives, not jumping ship. He should also expect to see some license irregularities time from time, especially in small business. He should bring this up, with the working alternatives. If you quit every job with a challenge then you'll end up no where.

    5. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. You work for a bad company with incompetent management.

      Part of your job as an admin is to make sure you're licensed properly, or the company will end up paying money, probably millions.

      Even if it's not a publicly traded company, your co-workers will end up being hurt.

    6. Re:Bide your time by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Find another job, while documenting everything you have. Tell your new employer, flatly, that you feel you're working in an ethicsless stability hell-hole that could be sued into the ground at any point, and that you've brought up numerous internal illegal activities to upper management repeatedly and they've flatly denied it or told you to ignore it. Be prepared to justify the extent of the behavior as far-reaching, and clarify the intent of continued behavior at all levels of management. Be prepared not to be hired by shady companies, and to be immediately hired on by companies that hire specific licensing compliance personnel to do their own internal audits (yes, companies actually search themselves for illegal use of products so they can determine business advantage to using them and either ban their use or obtain the proper license).

    7. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, it's okay for people to not say anything about corporate software piracy (hundreds if not thousands of dollars), but if you pirate a game for home use (around 60 dollars) or pirate a single song you're supposed to shut your mouth, end up in court and pay millions in damages?

      Talk about double standards.

      Other professions have liabilities and so should IT.

    8. Re:Bide your time by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Licensing irregularities are one thing(if nothing else, actually keeping track of licences for a nontrivial number of applications across a nontrivial number of clients is not easy unless you have a real system in place). I'd be more concerned about the CEO's "Golly shucks, we couldn't possibly be doing the wrong thing, even though you present compelling evidence from your area of professional experience that we are." attitude. It's even or worse odds that a guy like that will stonewall you relentlessly to save a nickel, then fuck you over to save himself it that ever becomes a problem.

    9. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a civil matter not a criminal one

    10. Re:Bide your time by AtomicOrange · · Score: 1

      I agree, this double standard between industry and the home user has to stop. IT professionals should stand up and notify their companies when there may be questions as to the validity of software.

      How liable is the IT professional if that organization comes in a does an audit and finds the company with numerous violations? Does the IT guy get held responsible?

      --
      "What is there a tank on the boat? WHY IS THERE A TANK ON THE BOAT?!?" L4D2
    11. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Exactly. If the "software police" ever file charges against your employer they will point to you as the person who did this and they had no clue. CYA. Find a job and move on as quick as you can. Otherwise you are the scapegoat. Don't laugh either as this happened to a close friend of mine in IT. When you do get another job turn em in. That is my advice. LOL. They were going to screw you if they needed to so give it to them.

    12. Re:Bide your time by RichardJenkins · · Score: 1

      Most companies I've worked for expend considerable resource in keeping track of licences, it is worth it to mitigate the expense of being caught with your pants down. Nuisance though, for sure.

    13. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I.T. is the farthest thing from a profession.

      No barriers to entry, no professional society to get bounced out of.

      Accounting, engineering, law, medicine are professions - we're computer janitors.

    14. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would add: Document everything. Save any emails about software installations, make a spreadsheet contains: Name of Software, Key used, Installed on, Requested by. Make an effort to get all software purchase receipts from your purchasing people, and attempt to collate the data points. Send a report to the president once a month, telling him what is in use and what your licensed for. Don't make threats, accusations, implications. Just state the facts, and keep a copy of what you sent, in case you need it later.

      While your documenting you might find that you are licensed for the software, if not in actuality, at least in spirit. For example, if you bought a machine from Dell Small Business and got Office in a bundle, but wiped it and re-installed with your own image, you're at least within the spirit of the license, even if you're really not supposed to. If this is the case, don't worry about it. Look for another job if you must, but otherwise be happy.

      If it turns out your not licensed for anything, don't worry about. Look for another job, be happy, go and send the BSA a note on the way out the door. Tell them what you found, the conversations that you had and your attempts to rectify the situation.

    15. Re:Bide your time by eepok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Troll? I don't know. If so, I bite.

      It's about having priorities. If you believe getting "far up the corporate ladder" is more important than your own ethics, then you're spineless.... or never had the ethics you thought you had. And you should be watched for malfeasance.

      The corporate, administrative, and political systems all live by the "good ol' boys club", "blue wall of silence", and "team players" code. If you hate it... don't become a part of it. If you like it, then I don't want you in those industries.

    16. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed. If they are this unethical, don't think they will hesitate to throw you under the bus when the lawyers come knocking.

    17. Re:Bide your time by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you just found the IT equivalent of ambulance-chasing laywers...

      1. Find job at company XYZ.
      2. Make a list of all licensing violations.
      3. Quit job, stating "found better job" or whatever.
      4. Call BSA with all violations, collect rewards.
      5. Profits!

    18. Re:Bide your time by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately most Management types have no clue what software licenses are, and trying to explain it to them is often useless. You really only have a few choices in a situation like this. You can keep working there, or you can find better employment. If you keep working there CYA and at least have your direct supervisor sign a piece of paper stating that you tried to inform them they were using pirated software. Now this may or may not go over well...so that's your call. Once you have been there for a while you can start steering them to better solutions, if they want to be cheap introduce them to free options like Open Office.

    19. Re:Bide your time by spydum · · Score: 1

      It really depends on the size of the company. I'd wager most larger companies track licenses and products as assets. For the Small to medium sized business, it all to often gets overlooked due to a lack of resources to track, and a lack of upper management backing to spend dollars on something they didn't previously pay for.

    20. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would normally tend to agree, but this organization doesn't sound like it's worth sticking around for. ex: the new do something else while winzip counts down policy.

      that's idiotic and is a good indicator of the business as a whole operates.

    21. Re:Bide your time by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Accounting, engineering, law, medicine are professions - we're computer janitors.

      Yeah... But at least you don't have a union to hold you back.

      --
      That is all.
    22. Re:Bide your time by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      To add to that -- report them to the BSA as you've found your new position. You can get a hefty reward, it makes it more worthwhile.

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    23. Re:Bide your time by grub · · Score: 1


      He should be recommending free alternatives

      Free alternatives to their current free alternatives...

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    24. Re:Bide your time by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Prepare the standard CYA documentation noting all the licensing discrepancies. Also put in your personal comments about the questionable ethics of company policy.

      If you feel the company/position is at risk, update your resume accordingly and seek work with a more ethical employer. During the interview process, remember it's a two-way street and you can ask questions too (for your example, what is their current policy on software licensing and when was the last time they did an audit?).

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    25. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Find another job, while documenting everything you have. Tell your new employer, flatly, that you feel you're working in an ethicsless stability hell-hole that could be sued into the ground at any point, and that you've brought up numerous internal illegal activities to upper management repeatedly and they've flatly denied it or told you to ignore it. Be prepared to justify the extent of the behavior as far-reaching, and clarify the intent of continued behavior at all levels of management. Be prepared not to be hired by shady companies, and to be immediately hired on by companies that hire specific licensing compliance personnel to do their own internal audits (yes, companies actually search themselves for illegal use of products so they can determine business advantage to using them and either ban their use or obtain the proper license).

      Tell your CURRENT employer this in your exit interview if you must... but its not any business of any future employers. It could even be considered a violation of your confidentiality agreement to tell others about this (you could get sued...) Also, if you tell a potential employer about something a former employer did wrong, they will be wondering what you will be saying about them in the future. In business the old adage "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all" is one to live by.

      If you feel you must take further action, file a report with the BSA (not the Boy Scouts of America - the Business Software Association) and be prepared for a shitstorm to ensue.

      In any case, get out ASAP. You are liable for your actions regardless of the fact that you are just following orders. Installing known pirated software for your employers is actionable -you could personaly face penalties. Telling the boss NO when he instructs you to install the software could get you fired as well.

      You tried to tell them about the problem. They chose not to listen. Now get yourself out of harms way.

    26. Re:Bide your time by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Oups, lawyers not laywers...

    27. Re:Bide your time by spun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The boss may be a sociopath, but even sociopaths can do the right thing if it happens to benefit them the most. Tell the boss that the BSA offers rewards for turning in companies that pirate software. Tell the boss that anyone can turn the company in. Tell him that, if that happens, based on his response to your initial reports and the fact that you are the software guy, you fully expect him to use you as his scapegoat.

      Then tell him you can only see two ways out of this dilemma: one, he does the right thing and gets the licenses. Two, you report the company, collect the reward, and find another job. Tell him you don't want to choose the second option, but if he doesn't do the right thing, it is the only way you can protect yourself. Finally, remind him that option two is by far the more expensive option for the company.

      At this point he will either become furious and fire you on the spot, gaining you some unemployment, or he will fix things. If he's a real sociopath, though, he may just fix things and then fire you anyway. It's probably best to pull this after you have another potential job lined up.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    28. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Please don't be as as stupid as this anon idiot thinks you should be.

    29. Re:Bide your time by TheoMurpse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Alternatively, you could refuse to BREAK THE LAW, get fired, and then sue and win. IIRC, most states have wrongful termination laws, where if you are terminated after refusing to break the law for your employer, you can get dollar bills (damages) or your job back (equitable remedy).

      Not a lawyer yet. I get licensed next week (passed the bar (woo!). I'm not your lawyer. This is not legal advice.

    30. Re:Bide your time by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Depends. The submitter claims to have tried to raise the issue and been shot down. Neither of us is in a position to distinguish between things like... Was the response really a hostile stone-walling as submitter seems to have perceived it, or just a sincere "we think you're mistaken"? How did submitter present the issue? What options were presented - or was only the problem presented? What evidence of the problem was presented? Frankly, how tactfully was the issue raised?

      GP's advice is valid if submitter made a solid attempt to raise the issue and was shot down. GP is making assumptions... but then you are also making (the opposite) assumptions. Yes, you have to be willing to face a challenge in the workplace, but you also have to know when the powers in a company have committed to a decision you don't want to be part of.

    31. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Depends on your point of view I guess. When I am stolen from I think it's criminal.

    32. Re:Bide your time by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Nor do any of those professions in right-to-work states (approx. 50% of all states). Right to Work Laws.

    33. Re:Bide your time by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, nice theory, but I have yet to see that work IRL. Why? Because they already HAVE the software they want, and as far as they are concerned it is FREE. The only way this is ever gonna change at a place like that is if they get bit in the ass by the BSA. Sorry but its true.

      True story-I was working at a decntly sized repair shop, when I saw the very first day that more than half the software they were using was obviously burnt pirated versions. So being a nice guy I went to the owner of the place and told him. You know what I got? "You're the smartest guy I've got, and you got experience with maintaining and setting up servers, right?" /yeahhhh...curious to where this is going/ " So you could set up this server 2003 (shows me a burnt CD of server 2K3 with keygen included written on it) so that any Vista machines we install will validate to our servers and not MSFT's right?"

      Needless to say I quit right then and there. Not a year later I heard they got busted when their "Vista server" got misconfigured and a bunch of folks got the WGA warning and turned them in. What did the owner do? Try to blame it on the lower IT guys doing the work, of course! So if the guy stays there he is royally screwed. With an attitude like what he got from management they don't give a crap if every machine in the place is full of hot software, and when they get busted he and his other IT workers will be setup to be the fall guys. No thanks and if he has a brain and ANY common sense he will GTFO as quickly as he can, and if he wants to CYA he might want to make a call to BSA afterward.

      But pointing out free alternatives won't work with them, because if they have any leanring curve AT ALL, or even cause the tiniest of inconvenience then they don't want it because to them ALL software is "free", and until they get busted they are correct, and when they get busted look for them to blame this guy and any other moron will to work IT for them. I've seen it happen over and over, so I know of which I speak.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    34. Re:Bide your time by __aamnbm3774 · · Score: 1

      He already mentioned the president is hard-up on his position.
      I'd take the advice from the parent.
      Dust off your resume.

    35. Re:Bide your time by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think they have a word for this... blackmail, isn't it?

    36. Re:Bide your time by clemdoc · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up (I wish I had mod points), parent is right on target. Although the way described may be cumbersome, it's the way to go.

    37. Re:Bide your time by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since you're the one that complained, they will naturally suspect you when the BSA or someone else shows up. Wait until someone gets fired or there's a tiff with the boss and an employee or something like that -- in other words, don't file a complaint until someone else there would have a reason to want to nail the boss, then file it so the timing makes it look like that person is complaining, not you.

    38. Re:Bide your time by rocker_wannabe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree, except for one thing. By your definition, software engineering isn't really a profession either. There is no professional association that accredits software engineers or kicks them out for writing crappy software. The barrier to entry isn't really that high either. I have yet to see a commercial software application that had any REAL warranty. Software warranties boil down to: "if it works, great. If it doesn't then too bad for you". If there are no consequences then there is no need to have a legally responsible engineer.

      I still find it amazing that companies are so heavily dependent on software that nobody really stands behind. I think this explains why IT can be such a miserable job. The company has to have someone to blame!

      --
      "Meaningless!, Meaningless!" says the Teacher. "Utterly meaningless!"
    39. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I work for a small company with four full-time employees. We have quite a bit of pirated software that we use alongside FOSS options. The fact is that the software we have will never be paid for, and I enjoy my paycheck far too much to raise a stink about. That's assuming I've got some sort of moral issue with using pirated software, which I don't.

      So, really, I don't fucking care. Arrr, matey.

    40. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I've been saying the same thing for YEARS. It's nice to know someone else see it the same way.

      Now comes the big question: how to we transition from what is essentially a blue-collar, skilled labor "job" to be the "profession" that so many of us want?

      1. Minimum Education: Baccalaureate Degree
      2. Industry Association
      3. Industry Licensing
      4. Code of Ethics
      5. Legal Liability

      Yeah. That'll happen.

    41. Re:Bide your time by element-o.p. · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You have a point, and I agree with you to some degree.

      However, 1) just because we are not members of some type of professional society does not mean that we IT workers should hold ourselves to a lower standard than the professions you listed; and 2) to some extent, we do have professional "societies" that many of us belong to -- although admittedly, not quite as formal or as strict as the professions you referenced. How many IT workers hold certifications -- and have those certifications as prerequisites of their jobs? In many cases, prospective IT workers may never get past the HR department without a piece of paper that says MCSE, CCNA, CCIE, etc. Many of those certifications state that if you use ${certificationOrganization}'s software in violation of it's EULA, you will lose your certification...which can make reemployment elsewhere rather difficult.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    42. Re:Bide your time by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 3, Informative

      Someone physically taking something from you and someone making a digital copy of something is not the exact same thing. If someone steals from you, yes, that is a criminal offense. When someone makes an unauthorized copy of something, that is a civil, and not criminal, offense.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    43. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do what you're told. Look for another job.

      that's what I did. Then I called the BSA after I left.

      I figured the software their were pirating was something they should have paid for and to be honest, I couldn't stand the attitude that they paid for a copy but can you install it on 300 more machines please?

    44. Re:Bide your time by Deosyne · · Score: 1

      It would be blackmail if he demanded money from the exec to keep things quiet. This is just CYA; either the licensing gets brought into compliance or the dude avoids being associated with widespread and flagrant piracy. The fact that he gets financially remunerated for closing the door on his job while covering his ass does not automatically convert it into the crime of blackmail.

    45. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . I have yet to see a commercial software application that had any REAL warranty. Software warranties boil down to: "if it works, great. If it doesn't then too bad for you". If there are no consequences then there is no need to have a legally responsible engineer.

      There are tons of commercial software applications that people's lives and livelyhoods depend on. Banking software, Pension administration, Medical software, traffic control software.. etc.

      Despite what you might think, there are consequences, and there are legally responsible parties. That's why there's QA. Tons of QA.

    46. Re:Bide your time by dasherjan · · Score: 1

      You hit the nail on the head. Whether it's right or not doesn't really enter into it once accounting is involved in the pirated software. If you're working at a place that uses pirated software, all you can really do is make sure your rear is covered if the people that own the software decide to sue.

    47. Re:Bide your time by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I've told employers in interview that a prior employer was an ethics hellhole before. They hired me. My last 3 employers have been decent; one even put clients and his employees above bare profit, as company policy, because money is plentiful and people are more important.

    48. Re:Bide your time by somersault · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even worse (in a way) - why are they being so stupid as to wait for Winzip when 1) it's pretty cheap (by corporate standards) and 2) there are FREE alternatives available

      --
      which is totally what she said
    49. Re:Bide your time by bakawolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      on the other hand, you've just screwed someone else over, if that tactic works. Do you really want to keep working at a place you have to call the BSA on anyway?

    50. Re:Bide your time by somersault · · Score: 1

      What rewards..?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    51. Re:Bide your time by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      I've been hoping for a long time that there would be some kind of CPA/SPE/bar/board equivalent for both IT and software design and engineering. It would really help our industries so very much. I believe it's only a matter of time before such things are created, but I really wish it would happen sooner rather than later.

      Perhaps some law will be passed requiring official certification or recognition... perhaps reducing the cost of insurance for an entity.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    52. Re:Bide your time by jslater25 · · Score: 1
      And the most important statement is to make sure you document absolutely everything. I would go so far as to keep copies of email (perhaps a hard copy printed in the event that your email suddenly goes away when BSA does catch wind of this), and document all phone conversations with dates/times and parties involved as well as face-to-face conversations.

      I've had an employer in the past that started off with trying to play hardball and didn't want to spend the cash to become license compliant, however he changed his tune when one of our competitors got a huge fine. Pretty amazing how that happens.

    53. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, janitors.
      It's not like we design and build the networks, clusters, databases, software and all the other business critical stuff ourselves.. oh wait...

    54. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have you got against laywers?

    55. Re:Bide your time by somersault · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. I don't think FACT or FAST have similar rewards here in the UK

      --
      which is totally what she said
    56. Re:Bide your time by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How so? They'll drag back the person who just left and then fire him?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    57. Re:Bide your time by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I have to agree here, my experience, is it takes M$ to actually walk in and start checking (which they can) on the software installed on the PCs, and then if your company is found guilty, they have to pay major fines.
      It happened once in my past, and I was not there the day they walked in, but heard about it afterwards, when they told me, why did they not hear about the pirated softwares they had, I showed them numerous emails pertaining to the fact that it was not legal to run with softwares as such, and these emails were left unanswered.

      They will keep doing this until they get caught, and end up on a grey list by MS$ which by then they usually need a scapegoat, so yes, start looking before they look for that scapegoat(YOU!)

    58. Re:Bide your time by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      >make sure your rear is covered if the people that own the software decide to sue.

      Which they probably won't, particularly if it's a small company making expensive (i.e. > $10K per seat) with a small customer base. They really don't want the reputation of being the company that sues someone for an extra copy on their notebook.

      If they're smart, they'll write their licenses to allow installation and use for one user on 3 computers (work, home, portable) and look the other way if an extra copy or two shows up.

      Is this fair or honest? No. It's the right *business* decision, which is a whole different thing.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    59. Re:Bide your time by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Would you really want your job back in such circumstances?

    60. Re:Bide your time by gnick · · Score: 1

      Whether it's criminal or civil doesn't matter much regarding the advice, "call the police." If the cops show up and you tell them that somebody kicked in your front door and stole your stereo, they'll take a report and tell you that they'll let you know if it shows up. Then you can write off your stereo and collect your homeowners insurance and move on with your life.

      If you call the cops and tell them that somebody half-way across the country copied a CD with something you wrote on it without asking your permission first, they'll tell you to go to hell and stop wasting their time.

      Hell, even if you go to the almighty MS and tell them that half of the Office licenses at your business are pirated, they may do the math and decide that the $$ they've collected on the XP licenses and legit Office installs is enough to avoid rocking the boat and blow it off.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    61. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't give me this crap again, stop dancing around the wrongness of it with semantics. You are wrong it's criminal. I feel I have been stolen from when an unauthorized copy of my software is made. At least you have deprived me of revenue. If you don't like it enough to pay for it or don't feel it's worth what I've ask you to pay stop using it period. If you continue to use and worse continue to copy it and pass it around you have stolen.

    62. Re:Bide your time by timlyg · · Score: 0

      tell them you will not be responsible for discovery. If you sense a problem in future, then be prepared to leave, don't be stupid (having showdown with boss or quitting without trying to settle the issue).

    63. Re:Bide your time by realityimpaired · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be blackmail if he demanded money from the exec to keep things quiet.

      Blackmail does not require the demand or exchange of money. It can also refer to demanding specific services or actions be performed, as well. As long as you're demanding that somebody do something they might not otherwise do, and the demand is backed by a threat of some sort, it's blackmail. In this case, it is blackmail, as it's quite clearly a case of saying "buy these licenses, or I go to the police". If I were the manager in question, I'd fire him on the spot. If the licensing issue were to come up in the future, I'd simply tell the software companies in question that this is part of the reason he was fired, and that we are already in the process of legitimizing the software licenses.

      It's also entirely possible that, despite his evidence, they actually do own licenses for the software. It's not uncommon for a company to use a volume license for software X, but to install it all from the same image/source, which can often be a burned CD or network drive.

    64. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's one difference between IT and janitors - sometimes the users LIKE their janitors.

    65. Re:Bide your time by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      You don't pay millions for pirating a game or song for personal use. People who download aren't seen as creating the copy.

      When you distribute copies, that is where the piracy technically occurs. People don't pay millions for downloading a game. The game shops that sell pirated copies of games for profit are being hit, because they are stealing income from the content creators. They deserve to be hit.

      I'm not saying the MPAA, RIAA, etc. are using good tactics. They're breaking the law and acting like douche-bags. That does not however justify stealing someone else's work and then charging others for it.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    66. Re:Bide your time by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I work in IT and belong to a union ;). So far its been pretty good for my career as I've been allowed to apply internally for all positions opened before they go to the public.

    67. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but in the interest of full disclosure, I included that as an option. I don't believe in hiding the ball.

      Posting anon because there's no reason for me to be rewarded with karma for following up with an answer to your question.

    68. Re:Bide your time by scsirob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Before you do, send a polite email message to your boss that you have been looking for the original licenses for the software to complete your audit and cannot seem to find them anywhere. Ask him where they are. Make sure you have "read receipt' on. Print the email as well as the receipt, and if he responds, print that too. Use it to cover your ass when the boss tells the authorities that he had no idea this was going on and wants to pin it on you.

      --
      To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    69. Re:Bide your time by Enderandrew · · Score: 1
      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    70. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One thing about being a professional is that every guy in the field is chained to the same code of conduct.

      Imagine this conversation with a lawyer or an accountant -

      Boss - please do %dodgy_thing%.

      Lawyer/Accountant - Hell no, I'm not getting disbarred/whatever for you guys, and furthermore there's not a lawyer/accountant in the country who will put their name on %dodgy_thing%.

      In the IT world there's lots of people who would happily install pirated software, the company can just turf the original poster and hire someone else off the street.

    71. Re:Bide your time by Jezza · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't think that's fair at all. If company XYZ doesn't want to be taken to court it's simple. Pay the price you should for the software you use. Now that might be free, or that might be a fortune - but you have a moral obligation as well as a legal one.

      It's simple - you want something someone has created you pay THEIR price or you don't get it - you don't have a right to it just because you want it. Now if some software is horrifically over priced, you don't buy it - you get something else or live without it.

      Piracy in SMEs is endemic, but I guess so is the mistreatment of staff. My advice? Turn them in. You've told them, it's not like they don't know. If they sack you, then sue them for wrongful dismissal. If they get caught, and it wasn't you that turned them in, you'll possibly find yourself carrying the can. Clearly they have no ethics, and they'll hang this on you to mitigate themselves.

    72. Re:Bide your time by Jezza · · Score: 1

      Yes they do. If memory serves it's 5% of any fines.

    73. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who works in IT at a larger company (65,000 employees) I agree with you. We track licenses as assets, don't give users administrative rights, have a license management system built into our software distribution system (with approval workflow, etc.) and have corporate policy that says you WILL have a license for any licensed software you are running. This gets reinforced via training, etc.

    74. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have another job lined up, why bother giving that SOB a choice?

    75. Re:Bide your time by djheru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, fail. Threatening to report illegal activity to the police unless the illegal activity stops is not blackmail by a long stretch.

    76. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Did it ever occur to you that "Call the Police" might be a metaphor?

    77. Re:Bide your time by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Because telling the IT guy to do something illegal or lose his job isn't already extortion?

      I'm not entirely sure what your post is trying to imply, but OP would only be just as bad as his boss, not worse.

      BTW, I assume the guy's job is at risk if he doesn't illegally pirate these various applications. If it ain't, then there isn't much reason for this askslashdot, is there?

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    78. Re:Bide your time by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      Free alternatives to their current stolen alternatives. There's a difference between free and stolen.

    79. Re:Bide your time by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorry, but no. That is called infringing on a copyright, not "stealing". Use the proper legal terms. I really don't care what your personal feelings are on the subject, just what the law says.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    80. Re:Bide your time by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell your CURRENT employer this in your exit interview if you must... but its not any business of any future employers. It could even be considered a violation of your confidentiality agreement to tell others about this (you could get sued...) Also, if you tell a potential employer about something a former employer did wrong, they will be wondering what you will be saying about them in the future. In business the old adage "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all" is one to live by.

      I've found, from past experience, that it's always good to be honest in your interviews. I flat out told a company that ultimately hired me, that one of the main reasons I'd left my previous job was that I felt that management didn't understand the industry, and that there were some questionable ethics going on behind closed doors. The company hired me. And on day 1 of my training, they said that ethics and openness were paramount within the company, and that if I ever felt that something was hinky, I was to e-mail my manager, and CC his boss. Within that organization, I *never* needed to take them up on that offer.

      Coincidentally, that organization was one that routinely monitored computers for pirated software. When they found something questionable, they e-mailed the person whose workstation it was, asking them to either remove the software or provide a license for it. If they didn't get an answer within 1 week, they'd e-mail the person's boss. 1 week after that, they'd have IT reimage the computer.

      Be honest. You're more likely to get a job that actually suits you.

    81. Re:Bide your time by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      Isn't there some agency or something that offers a money reward for bringing to light piracy in the workplace? Yeah, your company will hate you and you'll probably need to look for a new job, but if the reward is good enough...

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    82. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chill out scotty. He wasn't discussing the moral implications, just the legal ones. It may be wrong, but it isn't stealing according to the law.

    83. Re:Bide your time by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, you could refuse to BREAK THE LAW, get fired, and then sue and win. IIRC, most states have wrongful termination laws, where if you are terminated after refusing to break the law for your employer, you can get dollar bills (damages) or your job back (equitable remedy).

      Admittedly, I live in Canada where things like employees' rights actually matter, but aren't half of the states in the US "at-will" states, where your employer can terminate your employment at will, at any time, without notice or cause?

    84. Re:Bide your time by Abreu · · Score: 1

      The BSA offers rewards to whistleblowers?

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    85. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or there's www.bcs.org which have a code of conduct and everything.

    86. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of those certifications state that if you use ${certificationOrganization}'s software in violation of it's EULA, you will lose your certification...which can make reemployment elsewhere rather difficult.

      Is that EULA a clickwrap?
      Kidding aside, you also have a point. My opinion of many certifications, IT or otherwise, is that they are simply not well weighted, and rarely independent. Universities (at least publicly funded ones) are divorced from the controlling interests of what they teach. Microsoft says I understand their product manuals? Adobe thinks I'm good at memorizing their menu items? My certification exam was multiple choice, I didn't have to prove a damn thing about getting results from using the software. I'm expected to have a portfolio for that. The certification means I care enough to specialize, which may give me an edge over another employee with the same level of experience. It probably won't affect my salary, especially if I'm already employed, until there's opportunity for promotion.

      Also, you ask a Mechanical Engineer and a Software Engineer (just for the purpose of comparing 4-year degrees) how much of a salary bump their HR department gives them for a certification. Getting a P.Eng is dramatically and legally different from getting a MCSE. Plus the Engineer has a professional organization telling employers what their salary should be in order to stay competitive. What's Microsoft going to say other than "you could earn more working for us"?

    87. Re:Bide your time by spun · · Score: 1

      Because it's the right thing to do? Because it may avoid the hassle of moving to a new job? Because it puts the SOB in his place and lets him know you won't let him fuck with you?

      Sure, you could slink off and have your revenge anonymously, but where's the fun in that? This way, you're up in his face making him do the right thing. Way more fun.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    88. Re:Bide your time by kirillian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      7-zip works great...my company has used it for quite a while...and its stable.

    89. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The flaw in your argument is that you think the person who took the software to begin with was an actual sale.

      Odds on they weren't.

      Now if they were selling your software, that is a different story. Bang them up.

      I personally don't have any pirate software on my machine (Work and home). Mainly because I can afford what I want, or there are free alternatives. Work monitor the machine I use for illegal software and do a pretty good job of it.

      But the use of software I don't own has been instrumental in some of my purchases. For example I recently bought Photoshop Elements after I played with it on a friends machine (who I am pretty sure didn't pay for it).

    90. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wait, lawyers would never break the law?

      Are you smoking something expensive?

    91. Re:Bide your time by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      IIRC, most states have wrongful termination laws, where if you are terminated after refusing to break the law for your employer, you can get dollar bills (damages) or your job back (equitable remedy).

      If you recall correctly? Okay, so since you've passed the lawyer exam (even if not officially a lawyer yet), what's your area of expertise, then?

      Half-curious, half-wondering-why-you-aren't-completely-sure-of-your-statement.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    92. Re:Bide your time by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      Functionally, though, we need revisions of the various laws in place around unions and insurance. In my state, for my profession, if I do not join the union, I have no malpractice insurance. Since this also covers legal fees for when I would be found not guilty, I have no option but to join an organization that stands against most of my personal values.

    93. Re:Bide your time by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

      OK, I guess we know where you stand on the morality of the corporate ladder! If Mr Anonymous Coward ever asks me for a job I'll know what to say. But ignoring the moral dimension consider this - you may say "play by their rules" but that only makes sense if you're on an equal footing. This guy may very well not have the same amount of capital in the bank as his managers to tide himself over, plus he's probably easier to sack and replace, he doesn't have access to as many corporate (dirty?) secrets, etc. If he has dishonest management then he *could* just play by their rules, but part of their rules is probably "underlings get sacked if something goes wrong". Given they are wilfully setting up situations where stuff will probably go wrong and get people sacked, I don't think that's a game you'd want to play.

      If his managers are acting in good faith and genuinely don't understand then I guess he needs to respectfully attempt to explain the problem to them.

    94. Re:Bide your time by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Since you're the one that complained, they will naturally suspect you when the BSA or someone else shows up.

      I was going to say just the opposite, recommending that the original poster not wait. Why? Two reasons:

      • At this point, it isn't just an unknowing violation. It's clear that your management chain knows that this is happening and is deliberately allowing it to continue.
      • Someone is eventually going to turn them into the BSA, and when that happens, they're going to blame you anyway. Therefore, you might as well be the one who collects the reward.

      In your very first contact with them, be sure to ask to be part of the "BSA End User Reward Program", or else you can't collect your reward. You're going to need that reward to tide you over while you look for a new job.... :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    95. Re:Bide your time by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      Good advice. I suggest that if ethics drive your life, you reflect on which is more ethical, feeding your family or ratting out your boss. Finding a new job may or may not be doable, and you might find your new job is worse ethicwise than your old one. The one easy thing you can do is write a cya letter. Write a letter describing your concerns, phrase them as opinions and/or suspicions then mail it to yourself. Put it in your desk, unopened, and you have some manner of proof that you tried to do the right thing.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    96. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say call the BSA and report them as soon as you are certain they won't suspect you. People like the AC parent who ridicule and want you to accept the corporate line of crap your management wants to spew are wrong and the reason they feel comfortable supporting that line is not enough people do what is right.

      I went through a similar situation in a government agency where they were running lots of copies of unlicensed software. They had bought a few copies but then workers freely copied it everywhere and it was to the point that we had some $20k of unlicensed and illegal software. I went to management and reported the situation but we didn't have funding to make them all legal. The work being done with all of the illegal copies was considered essential so they kept right on breaking the license.

      Luckily, my management had made the mistake of asking me to find out how much it would cost to license it properly and I had to work with the software rep to get those numbers. My management was in a bind since the vendor then knew we were illegal.

      I don't know what happened after that because as you can guess I didn't make friends in management by bringing it to their attention and was among a number of employees turned loose during a budget cut.

      Instead of me being on the chopping block, it was my management that should have been held responsible for the software license Waterloo they put themselves in. All I did was alert them to their exposure and then on their direction, contacted the vendor to find out what it would cost to go legitimate.

      If any entity is going to use software that costs money to license, buy, or use, then they should have to pay. Anything else is theft. And turning on the people who try to protect the company or entity by alerting them to their exposure is wrong and should be punished. This incident occurred at a government agency. Had I not landed another good job elsewhere there I would have taken it to court. I am certain this one thing is what pissed off the group leader and put me in the chopping block list.

      More people need to stand up to this kind of behavior and swing the pendulum to where it is management in the crosshairs if they don't follow the rules because they put everyone else in jeopardy that knows about and goes along with their behaviors.

    97. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry , you live in such a sheltered life. I think you will eventually find that there are a lot of dodgy lawyers and accountants.

    98. Re:Bide your time by gnick · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realize it's a metaphor. But for what?

      You've got 200 Dell workstations at your office all running licensed copies of Windows. You, as an IT guy, find out that 100 of these machines are running pirated copies of Office, AVG Free, and trial versions of Winzip.

      Apart from internal IT management, who do you call that cares enough that they'll take action? Who are "the police" that you're supposed to call? Note - Microsoft, AVG, and Winzip are all WRONG answers, as none of them will bother except to possibly forward your e-mail to management with a note that says, "sbeckstead tells us that you're using our product improperly. Please see our EULA _HERE_ and rectify this situation at your earliest convenience."

      "Call the police" is pretty worthless advice as "the police" is a pretty nebulous metaphor for... well... nobody...

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    99. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It(The DMCA) criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures (commonly known as digital rights management or DRM) that control access to copyrighted works."

      Simply making an unauthorized copy of a copyrighted work does not necessarily mean you have circumvented measures taken that control the work. It may not have been protected by DRM, in which case you have a simple civil copyright infringement.

    100. Re:Bide your time by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Yep... and make sure to file a report with the BSA on your old employer once you find a new job.

      Come to think of it, I should have done this to a former employer. Some of the things they were doing were downright criminal... like purchasing a single license of VMWare ESX server and Windows 2003 Enterprise edition and then deploying it on 8 VMWare hosts and dozens of virtual machines.

    101. Re:Bide your time by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Well, the BSA I'm sure would be interested, but they are not "the police" by any stretch. And they cannot lock you up for a civil offense.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    102. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telling him upfront what you might be about to do sounds reckless. It gives him time to fix things and make you look like the bad guy. You are giving him time to prepare using you as a scapegoat.

      No matter how sure you are of yourself, talking too much can break your neck. Keep in mind that managers are often enough professional con-men and liars who have access to the company's lawyers.

    103. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there is one thing I will add to this. If you hang around long enough, with a person like this, you will probably catch them breaking a really serious law (like federal). That's when you can turn it around.

    104. Re:Bide your time by nine-times · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At this point he will either become furious and fire you on the spot, gaining you some unemployment, or he will fix things. If he's a real sociopath, though, he may just fix things and then fire you anyway. It's probably best to pull this after you have another potential job lined up.

      Even if he doesn't fire you, he'll probably find ways to punish you and make your life hell. It's probably best to pull this after you have another job lined up and want to quit anyway.

    105. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      yah because there isnt a multi billion dollar ponzi scheme that was run by a banker and his accountants or anything like that.

    106. Re:Bide your time by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Look for another job.

      Agreed.

      It sounds like the people he works for are assholes. There's only one thing to do when you work for such people and that's look to get out.

      The fact that it's software piracy is secondary to the fact that these are some miserably cheap employers and the probability that you will be satisfied working there is zero.

      There are efforts underway in lots of companies to cut costs at the expense of two things: 1) doing what's right, and 2) paying and treating employees properly. If they aren't doing #1, they almost certainly won't do #2.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    107. Re:Bide your time by aztracker1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of the software in question has viable alternatives. 1: instead of MS Office, install OOo, unless they pay for more keys. 2: instead of WinZip, 7-zip rules (there's other front ends for 7-zip) and you can make the default format for 7zip .zip instead of .7z ... 3: use PDF Creator or another print to pdf option, keeping originals in an editable document format.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    108. Re:Bide your time by Jeian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know what's worse, that someone is suggesting (as part of an ethics discussion, no less) that you effectively frame another employee, or that said suggestion got modded Insightful.

    109. Re:Bide your time by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      I think the word you're searching for as an alternative to "professional" is "craftsman".

      I thought it was odd that for my undergraduate CSCI degree, I was required to take a philosophy course on Professional Ethics, even though the class very specifically pointed out that computer programmers, computer scientists, etc. were not professionals. A very realistic introduction to the business world, that was.

    110. Re:Bide your time by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      ...Or call the BSA. Of course if you're going to do that, better not to identify yourself by bringing your concern to management first.

      It would seem that ship has already sailed in this case. Maybe they can cash in on reward money!
      https://reporting.bsa.org/usa/rewardsconditions.aspx

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    111. Re:Bide your time by Imrik · · Score: 1

      However, with the way peer to peer networks work, downloading and distributing a copy are nearly the same thing.

    112. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then call BSA once you've found the other job.

    113. Re:Bide your time by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      Free *& legal* alternatives then.

      Or, you could argue that the current free alternatives are only that way until the software audit hits.

      I totally sympathize with the poster though. You either have to fix the situation, or get out before someone fixes you. It's not a matter of if, but when.

    114. Re:Bide your time by netruner · · Score: 1

      What you would have to offset is the value gained by employing people with little or no credentials in their area of expertise.

      The whole argument supporting H1B visas is that there aren't enough qualified people for the jobs - and that's counting the meaningless credentials as actual qualifications. The addition of a professional society that will undoubtedly set the bar higher than it is now will only shrink the pool of "qualified" (and I mean that in the most liberal sense) persons.

      --



      DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    115. Re:Bide your time by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 1

      IANAL either, but I know that passing the bar is a state-by-state test; you don't just take one test that covers the laws of all the states, you take a test for the state you are going to be licensed in (or the federal version, but that only covers federal law). So it's entirely reasonable he wouldn't know about the precise details of the law in "most states" even if he picked up a general knowledge in law school.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    116. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't get far up the corporate ladder if the BSA waltzes in with a motion of discovery and shuts the company down due to IP violations. In fact, when (not if) this happens, it likely will be the OP who gets thrown under the bus.

      So, its a choice. Walk off the job and have the people bad mouth you as a do gooder, or stay there, and get a major IP infringement rap pinned on you when the BSA comes a knocking.

    117. Re:Bide your time by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should just quietly report this stuff to RIAA/MPAA/software association (whichever is applicable), and let them handle it. If they don't do anything (and they probably won't), then they apparently don't care, so why should you?

      Me I just try to make myself invisible, hang onto my job, and take my paycheck. I want to retire when I'm 45-50 and I can't achieve that goal if I get noticed and then laidoff

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    118. Re:Bide your time by broggyr · · Score: 1

      +1... or should it be +7? :)

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    119. Re:Bide your time by RajivSLK · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lawyer - Hell no, I'm not getting disbarred/whatever for you guys, and furthermore there's not a lawyer in the country who will put their name on %dodgy_thing%.

      You're kidding right?

    120. Re:Bide your time by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      For starters the license key is not proof. If you get audited you will be required to show actual purchase orders for all software. Doesn't matter if everything is licensed with a key downloaded from the internet or separate keys from the original box. Also doesn't matter if you have a stack of license key slips in a file cabinet, they wont take them as proof that you purchased them. Only original invoices.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    121. Re:Bide your time by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree in principle that a good professional society that can help enforce minimum standards of ethical conduct is probably a good idea. (Basically: Have them stated, be prepared to support those who uphold them, and keep accounting of who and where they are being intentionally violated, so that they can be shamed.)

      And there doesn't seem to be one. It would probably take a while for one to get fully established, then recognized, and accepted. But that could only happen after one gets started.

      So, the next question is: How do we start one?

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    122. Re:Bide your time by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      So far the precedent seems to be that you have a fully downloaded copy, and then you need to then distribute it afterwards.

      Last time I checked, the MPAA and RIAA haven't had success with their "making available" strategy. Judges seem to want proof they were going out of their way to distribute.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    123. Re:Bide your time by realityimpaired · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that this isn't a criminal matter, and you're not going to the police to report a crime. You're going to a civil organization which will litigate a civil matter. Namely, alleged software piracy.

      The point stands... if I were a manager and one of my employees came to me with an ultimatum like that, I'd fire them on the spot. If you're planning on going to the BSA, just do it. Don't threaten your employers with the nasty consequences if they don't do what you want them to do. It's hugely inappropriate to go to your employer with an ultimatum. There's proper ways to handle situations like this, and threatening to go to the BSA isn't the smart thing to do. Neither is ignoring the situation, as that can come back to bite you in the ass.

      What the submitter should do is what others have come forward to suggest: namely, either find another job, or make a business case for either buying/rebuying the licenses (reminding them that if somebody went to the BSA it'd be *very* expensive to get caught with their pants down is not the same as threatening to do so yourself), or for switching to software that doesn't require a license. Make it clear to management that you want to work with them to remedy the situation so that it doesn't become a problem with the BSA, rather than a threat that if they don't fix the problem you *will* go to the BSA.

    124. Re:Bide your time by Rennt · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself, I value my professional membership (ACS) above any of my certificates or qualifications.

      I've told managers that I won't be doing X because is contravenes section X.XX of the ACS code of conduct and I am bound to report such behaviour if I see it. They back down right quick.

    125. Re:Bide your time by The+Disaster+Master · · Score: 1

      Working for an IT Outsource company I went through this exact same scenario not six months ago, let me pass on how I handled it. First after doing the proper thing( approaching the Boss) and asking to replace illegal software I got the same answer, "Has to be legal, we purchased it at some point in time". Next, I went to the BSA site, got all the info on fines and such as well as how the courts handle it, calculated what the fine would be and brought it to the "Boss". (ours would would have been in the neighborhood of 542K dollars a day until replaced just for unlicensed MS Office not counting the over all fine) and since I showed them that the Company not the IT department would have to pay regardless of who actually installed it and that I as the new head of IT could not and would not lie under oath guess what happened, they decided to document the finding, and fess up the money to fix the issue. Now your company may not be so easy, or it might be, either way, I was in that boat and if they had not done right I would have had no option but to pickup the phone and call BSA. If you don't feel you can do that, then either be prepared to suffer the with the rest of them, or find a new job now.

    126. Re:Bide your time by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      There is an exception to that rule: If you are fired for refusing to take an action in clear contravention of constitutional or statutory law, then you can sue for wrongful termination (or some cause of action like that).

      Not legal advice. Not a lawyer. Not your lawyer. Don't drink and drive.

    127. Re:Bide your time by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points. Eepok, you are entirely correct, but the corrupt always rule the day.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    128. Re:Bide your time by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      IIRC because I only have to know Texas and federal law to pass the bar exam. I had to write a paper discussing wrongful termination once, and I read about Wisconsin and Texas laws for that. I believe I already read a general 50-state survey that stated most (all?) states have wrongful termination laws like I've described.

      You typically have no area of expertise when you first get out of law school. There are no majors, and any law school that tells you otherwise is a crappy law school.

      Just about the narrowest you can talk about when you get out of law school is civil vs. criminal and litigation vs. transactional (contracts, mergers, "doing deals," etc.).

      I would fall in the civil litigation quartile simply because crimlaw doesn't interest me, and transactional (while it has GREAT exit options) does not seem as fun (although I'd probably be better at it, considering my math background).

    129. Re:Bide your time by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      But with fewer idiots and fewer ducktape jobs presented as production enterprise grade servers/applications we'll need fewer IT professionals.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    130. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is against the law for an employer to fire an employee for refusing to do something illegal.

      If the employee brings up the illegal software to his superiors, receives a request to break the law, refuses and is then fired, he could EASILY bring a lawsuit against the company. Many lawyers would salivate at the opportunity that this would present.

      My advice:

      1) Send an email to the relevant people detailing the problem (i.e. i've found x copies of y software that I can't find documented licenses for).
      2) In your email, also say that we need to find documentation that we own these licenses or purchase the required number of licenses. If these don't happen then you'll have to uninstall these softwares from computers until we can.
      3) If your boss asks you to install a software that you believe comes from a questionable source, get his request in an email, say it will cost $x, if he says "do it anyway", then refuse (make sure this exchange takes place in email)
      4) make sure this all communication is documented. If your they ask you to do something in person, ask him to follow up with an email, or follow up with an email of your own so that it's documented.
      5) Save all copies of all emails and documentation.

      if/when you get fired, take all the emails and your documentation to the nearest lawyer who will SALIVATE at the opportunity. Then report them to the BSA, bring all copies of all communication for them. You just made their case for them, and they will reward you.

      6) find another job. If a future potential employer asks about them, just say that you left because of behavior you witnessed and viewed as unethical and illegal. You would have your lawsuit against the employer and the BSA lawsuit and/or settlement as evidence.
      7) List "Software Licensing Compliance Experience" on your resume. Legit companies who really do want to cover their own asses will look at that as a positive.

    131. Re:Bide your time by whitelabrat · · Score: 3, Informative

      That right. I would suggest that you line up another job before you notify BSA. Otherwise I would suggest pushing things like OpenOffice as an alternate to getting legit licensing.

    132. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now for the bigger, more cynical question: Will this result in any more pay for IT professionals, or will this result in having to go through a lot of licensing for not much more pay?

      The reason why this works for other professions is that the industry is static.

      Companies are used to paying bottom dollar for IT people and threatening to outsource (either to another company, or offshore) as opposed to headcount. Having IT work become a profession like this is hard pressed, because for the non techies, it is hard to compare a teenager who fixes Windows so he can run WoW at work versus a CISSP professional with 20+ years in the field.

    133. Re:Bide your time by confused+one · · Score: 1

      fine, call Microsoft, AVG Technologies, and Corel. then call BSA. Make sure you've documented everything and be prepared to be blamed (you are the IT guy, after all -- "We had know idea that our rogue IT guy was installing illegal copies of software!"). Also be prepared to find another job if you don't already have one, because if they find out who turned them in it will likely not look good on your performance review.

    134. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that this isn't a criminal matter, and you're not going to the police to report a crime.

      In the US, willful infringement over $1,000 IS a crime. IANAL but I should think if three-ish pieces of business software were pirated, it would exceed a total worth of $1000, and the CEO refusing to get properly licensed when informed of the situation might be considered willful infringement on the part of the company. If that were the case, he could indeed go to the police with it. Of course, I have nfc who would be prosecuted if the company were found criminally liable, so...

    135. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people at my company wonder how I reply to messages without reading them.

    136. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      That's great, but they could easily hire someone for your position who isn't in the ACS.

      There's lots of occasions where you're legally obligated to uses a lawyer/acc't/engineer in good standing.

    137. Re:Bide your time by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see.

      Well justified.

      Nice job going into civil law. Now, you'll be able to jump into every RIAA thread with almost as much qualificaiton as NYCL. ;P

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    138. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      If someone wants to be e.g. a welder, he needs x amount of school, followed by y amount of apprenticeship before he can call himself a welder.

      There are things in the building code/etc. that require a certified welder to sign off on. Welders/pipefitters/steamfitters/etc have it much better then IT workers.

      I'm not sure if you can lose your certification because of fuck-ups, anyone know?

      I'd love to see an school + apprenticeship model in IT btw.

    139. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A true sociopath would report his own company and pin the blame on you!

    140. Re:Bide your time by monkeySauce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As someone with long experience working with lawyers I can tell you that the percentage that are dirty, crooked scumbags is just as high as in IT or the general population. If no lawyer did anything dodgy then there wouldn't be many disciplinary or disbarment hearings, yet they happen all the time. Just look up news reports of lawyers busted for fraud involving millions or billions of dollars. There are several from just the past few days, and that's only one type of dodgy act and only the high-profile cases that make the news.

    141. Re:Bide your time by drsquare · · Score: 0

      If getting malpractice insurance and your legal bills paid is against your personal values, you must have pretty strange personal values.

    142. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.ca/search?q=lawyers+disbarred+2009

      This year, how many IT people were permanently booted from their line of work because of negligence/malfeasance?

    143. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I am an engineer (EE), but I am also a system admininstrator.

      Until IT people get paid like other professionals, then liability should not be a factor. If I am going to be liable for my network in the same way I am liable if I build a toaster that kills a family, then I expect to be paid well.

      Having a good base of friends and co-workers in IT and engineering, I can say that both are almost equivalent in their intelligence (once you get to the high end stuff - we aren't talking about format/replace IT people), but the wages are about 30% lower for IT compared to EITs and regular, non P.Eng engineers.

      If I screw up that toaster (killing people) as a P.Eng, I lose my stamp and lose my credibility, I may not be licenced after that, I can no longer work as an engineer. If I screw up a backup plan and leave a company with no data, and they go out of business, as an employee, they cannot sue me, they hold the liability, and although my credibility may be gone too, there is no license to take away, so I can move somewhere else and start working again. The engineer, unfortunately will be blacklisted by all governing bodies.

      So, until IT gets the same professional organisations looking out for them, protecting them, and also protecting their credentials, we won't get paid the same, nor will we get taken as seriously.

      Whenever I meet someone knew, I always say I'm a computer guy first...after the initial disappointment or the "one-up" by the other party, I go, "oh, and an EE, P.Eng, with a B.Sc. in CS too - I also play the Bongos)

    144. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO. Don't do this. Yes, it may be tempting to nail an ex employer by doing this, but managers talk while in a foresome at the back 9. Just like prison, businesses hate rats and snitches. They might not overtly be able to take revenge, but they can ensure that someone who is known for turning people in at previous jobs will not be there come the next round of axing. They can make sure the person who turned people in will not be working for anyone that the ex employer knows, and that can be a lot of people.

    145. Re:Bide your time by hibiki_r · · Score: 2, Informative

      So you think there's no shady lawyers and accountants that will break every rule in the book? There's plenty of breaking codes of conduct in those professions. It might be less likely than in IT, but the amounts of money involved in corporate piracy tends to be smaller than when a corporation deceives or outright lies in their quarterly reports.

    146. Re:Bide your time by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      Just like you're supposed to shut-up and dump toxic waste illegally, or bar exit doors during working hours, or a multitude of other things that don't make waves. Eventually something goes bad, and you are sitting infront of the barrel waiting to see if the bullet spins into the right hole.

    147. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, given the principal attack vector of most malware, we're jizz-moppers.

    148. Re:Bide your time by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      Seems like there should be a way to document this kind or thing and report on it. Come to the boss with it needing to be fixed and that you are going to report on it if it isn't. If you get fired you have documentation as to why, and (I am not a lawyer) that might be able to stand in court.

    149. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also play the Bongos

      Hey, it's Feynman.

    150. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From one of your own posts - "Copyright is not theft."

      So I guess deep down even you know you are full of shit.

    151. Re:Bide your time by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I actually used to frequently (I focused on IP and int'l law in law school just for my own interests). However, I've pretty much given up because there are too many armchair lawyers here who spout off inane interpretations of the law no matter how many times I provide sound refutations with links. It's like trying to turn the ocean freshwater.

    152. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I work in both IT and Education I have been offered membership in a union and steadfastly refuse to join one of those corrupt, self serving, industry destroying political lobbies.

    153. Re:Bide your time by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      and when one of us dies, we throw him on the fire, and it's more meat for the meat eaters.

      i do agree with you though.

      but really, more meat.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    154. Re:Bide your time by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I've been hoping for a long time that there would be some kind of CPA/SPE/bar/board equivalent for both IT and software design and engineering. It would really help our industries so very much. I believe it's only a matter of time before such things are created, but I really wish it would happen sooner rather than later.

      No need for all that. We could start with a simple code of ethics. If people adhere to it, they don't need anything else, and if they don't adhere to it, no amount of certification or regulation will help.

      It would include such complicated requirements as "Don't pirate shite. Not even good shite." "Don't enable invasion of privacy." "Do encourage open standards instead of shite." "Do document your own shite." "Shite happens is not an excuse." "When you leave a place, leave passwords, code, etc. behind - it's not yours." "NDA term is 1 year from exit. No more, no less."

      There ae plenty of examples to draw from.

      or, for those who prefer KISS:

      10 REM BASIC CODE OF CONDUCT (PUN INTENDED)
      20 DO NOT SCREW PEOPLE OVER
      30 GOTO 10

      /* C our new code of ethics */
      #include <std/ethics.h>
      int main(int argc, char* argv[], char* env[]) {
      ethics_init();
      ethics_run();
      /* insert your code here */
      ethics_free();
      return NO_ETHICAL_VIOLATIONS_FOUND;
      }

      #regex code of ethics - see the power of regular expressions!
      s/evil/good/gi;

      I'd put a java version, butTheNamesOfTheVariousClassesWouldBeTooFuckingLongAndTheMethod-InvocationsAndAllTheTryExceptHandling-WouldBeSooooooooErrorProne-ItWouldBeAnEthicalViolationToDoSo and we'd end up in debugging ecursion hell anyway.

    155. Re:Bide your time by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Good to know.

      You might want to update your sig to point out that it's not legal advice... of course, this being a public Internet forum, you're essentially anonymous and anybody who takes what you say as legal advice needs to be smacked upside the head. You could be giving the absolutely correct and true interpretation as supported by realms of case law, but if I turn around and present it as an argument before a court without at least running it past a lawyer that I'm paying, I'm an idiot. :P

      I might just as well try to claim that I've got a PhD in some obscure field that doesn't matter, and a Ni-Dan in Jiu Jitsu. Without telling you who I am and giving you some way to look up and validate the claim, it should be treated as an outright lie. (only one of the claims is true, and it's largely irrelevant anyway, as I no longer train or compete in Jiu Jitsu due to some serious injuries that've built up over the last 20 years)

    156. Re:Bide your time by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      NONE of those professions have unions. (Not so sure about accounting, but given they're good with numbers I'm going to side with no).

      Medicine it goes against the Hippocratic oath.
      Engineering it goes against something which is slipping my mind right now.

      Unions are nothing more than big babysitters now.

    157. Re:Bide your time by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Have you ever actually HAD a job? Because, in case you haven't noticed, jobs aren't all that easy to come by. Perhaps telling the CEO of YOUR company off like this won't get you escorted out immediately by security, but it probably would in his case. I can't think of a scenario won't get the poor guy's arse immediately fired, but I can think of plenty of scenarios where he ends up being sued. And even if (LONG odds here) the boss decides to fix things, you will never, ever, ever be promoted or see a raise. More likely you'll get lots of 'incidents' filed in your personnel file and you'll get fired in a few months. You'll have no memory of these 'incidents' of being late, rude, and sexist, and they will be filed anonymously by people 'afraid of repercussions'.

      OP, here's my advice.

      1) Keep a log of the times you've been asked to violate copyright law. Keep it at home, and enter in stuff after hours. Object gently when you are asked to borken the lawz, just so that you can honestly say that you did object.

      2) Look for another job.

      3) When you find one, call BSA and offer them your logbook. Take a vacation on the money you get.

      OR...

      1) STFU! Keep your nose to the wheel and enjoy the piratezes softwarez. Save a bit of money so that if (when?) the software company gets audited, and you're out of a job, you have something to fall back on.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    158. Re:Bide your time by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering_professionalism

      Texas licenses software engineers. usually for safety critical applications. I wish it'd spread. Maybe then fewer Airbuses and Boeings would have software problems.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    159. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Out of context and not even correct. I said Copyright is not theft in response to someone who said it was. Moron! You do understand the meaning of Copyright verses the meaning of Copyright violation right?

    160. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      The flaw in your argument is that you think the person who took the software to begin with was an actual sale.
      Not even relevant to the argument.
      Most legitimate software companies supply trial versions. If they don't, don't use it if you can't preview it. What part of "Obey the law" do you people not understand?
      There shouldn't even be an argument here.

    161. Re:Bide your time by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's one difference between IT and janitors - sometimes the users LIKE their janitors.

      Another difference - janitors can drink on the job ... oh, wait ...

      9 similarities and one difference between programmers to janitors:

      1. They both have to clean up shit.
      2. They both aren't really see as all that important until the shit hits the fan.
      3. They're both told it's more important to "just get the job done" and not waste time making sure it's perfect.
      4. The boss always underestimates the length of time it will take to do the job properly
      5. They both instinctively know that PowerPoint makes you stupid
      6. They both have less pr0n and malware on their computers than their boss.
      7. They both understand the importance of "visiting the library" as a temporary reprieve
      8. It might be good enough today, but you know by next week, the guys in marketing will have made a mess of things
      9. They both belivee that if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself.

      One important difference: Janitors have better unions. Unlike programmers, janitors have a limit to the amount of shit they have to take from their bosses.

    162. Re:Bide your time by MJMullinII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As I work in both IT and Education I have been offered membership in a union and steadfastly refuse to join one of those corrupt, self serving, industry destroying political lobbies.

      Oh go cry us a river.

      First and foremost, I would like it made clear I am *not* a member of a Union,...however, considering the garbage I've had to deal with, I'd gladly join one if it were available. I really grow tired of this "anti-Union" talk from people WHO WOULD BENEFIT FROM COLLECTIVE BARGAINING THE MOST.

      I don't understand where this belief comes from that *you* (or I for that matter) have a duty to be the martyr on the cross of exploitation by major corporations. I don't care if you're talking about IT in a company like IBM, or a Construction worker down on 5th street. Taking advantage of your employees is TAKING ADVANTAGE OF YOUR EMPLOYEES...there's no other way to look at it.

      As someone said earlier, is the company going to take responsibility if this gets discovered, or are they going to forget all about the fact they were told something wasn't kosher and decide it was all the fault of this "lone rogue person"

      I'd put money on the corporation covering their ass every time.

      --
      "Don't be a martyr -- BE THE ONE WHO GOT AWAY!"
    163. Re:Bide your time by operagost · · Score: 1

      Oh he could just report the company, collect the big "finder's fee" from the BSA, and find a new job. I'm just saying...

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    164. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the pointer. I'd forgotten to do that, and now I'm so close to actually being a licensed attorney (week or two away?), I might as well wait until the swearing-in ceremony and until I get my bar card.

      The reason I often post that "not your lawyer" spiel is that if I don't, someone could very well make the argument that I agreed to be his lawyer by offering legal advice. I'd be open to a malpractice suit.

      And the federal government doesn't pay me enough to deal with a malpractice suit. ;)

    165. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      BSA comes to mind, and there are other ways to force compliance, be creative people give me a break. I shouldn't have to take you by the hand and point to the pretty pictures on the menu for you to think for yourselves.

    166. Re:Bide your time by emandres · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used OOo? It's a steaming pile of garbage. It might work on hobby linux boxes, but it is nowhere near the caliber of software that MS Office is, nor is it appropriate in a corporate environment. Whenever I use have to use OOo I end up spending half my time trying to figure out how to get automatic numbering to work correctly (the other day, it was trying to number things ai. bii. ciii., etc for me. That's not acceptable.). In addition, it's not accurate in it's representation. After trying to copy said screwed up list from OOo to a plain text editor, I got a list like 1. asdf 1. foo 2. bar .... where it was originaly 1. asdf 2. foo 3. bar in OOo. If I have to spend this much time to get something to work that's supposed to streamline your use of the software, something is horribly wrong. OOo is a direct analog of the GIMP: a noble effort to recreate a professional software suite that turned into an epic fail. Just like it's near impossible to create anything good in the GIMP in comparison with Photoshop, likewise it's near impossible to create anything good from OOo in comparison with MS Office.

      And who uses WinZip anymore? Ever since Windows started including built in zip compression/decompression, I have seen no use at all for WinZip.

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    167. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you were being sarcastic given the rep the majority of lawyers have. Does it strike you as ironic that even if you take the analogy you made to be true, you just called all management positions as not professional?

    168. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I disagree. When the BSA comes knocking, who do you think will be the fall guy? Do you think anyone in this company will admit to their crime? The whole company management philosophy is probably built around petty larceny and denial, and they vainly think that canning an IT staff member will make the BSA go away.

    169. Re:Bide your time by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      Do what you're told. Look for another job. Inform the BSA.

      "There, fixed that for you."

    170. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is against the law for an employer to fire an employee for refusing to do something illegal.

      Let me stop you right there.

      It's not "illegal" to install unlicensed software - it's a violation of the license agreement, or copyright. Licenses are not law. Law is made by governments.

      Neither of those things (copyright infringement or license violation) are criminal acts - they are covered by civil law. The penalty is getting sued for damages, not being arrested and sentenced to anything.

      There is a difference between civil and criminal law, and it's important to understand the distinction.

      Thankfully, where I work every installation is fully licensed.

    171. Re:Bide your time by WNight · · Score: 1

      Those rules are always funny. As if someone forgets how to do the work simply because they ignore the EULA...

      Funny though, in that they only bite the hands that try to play nicely with MS, Oracle, etc. The people without the certs aren't bound to any of that crap.

      When we say it sucks to be an MCSE, we mean it.

      (Can you imagine losing your MCSE because you pulled your HD out of a dead computer and installed it in another - it's a violation of the retail EULA... Suckers.)

      That's one major thing holding back any sort of licensing. Microsoft/etc is going to be all over it and turn not-saying-anything-bad-about-MS into one of the core principles.

    172. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WinZip isn't free... 7zip is, just to name one.

    173. Re:Bide your time by thczv · · Score: 1

      If I was the boss and you said this to me, I would fix the licenses and THEN fire you.

    174. Re:Bide your time by fataugie · · Score: 1

      FINALLY! A
      Do something....Profit!

      post where the inbetween isn't a bunch of question marks.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    175. Re:Bide your time by Space_Pirate_Arrr · · Score: 1

      Be honest. You're more likely to get a job that actually suits you.

      I second that.

    176. Re:Bide your time by RickRussellTX · · Score: 1

      As long as you're demanding that somebody do something they might not otherwise do, and the demand is backed by a threat of some sort, it's blackmail.

      "Obey the law or I'll report you to the authorities," is not blackmail. Period. No court would throw someone in jail for a good-faith effort to demand compliance with the law, and in fact the law specifically protects the rights of various classes of whistleblowers precisely so they can demand compliance without fear of losing their jobs.

      It only becomes blackmail if you demand something other than compliance with the law.

    177. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      steadfastly refuse to join one of those corrupt, self serving, industry destroying political lobbies.

      There is not a "ROLLS EYES" big enough for that comment. Go back to reading your Ayn Rand novels you colossal tool.

    178. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is totally arse about face. IFF you were to get caught with a pirated game or wotnot, then you'd be up for some fine, unlikely more than a few thousand. Developers, and distributors probably wouldn't bother with law suits, because damages would only amount to the lost revenue, of one person's one game purchase.
      When you're talking an enterprise with thousands of installs of each product the game is completely different. Companies face real penalties from copyright infringements. Many small businesses have gone under from this.

    179. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, wrong. What you need to do is inform him of this in a letter or email. Don't try to strong arm him. But explain it to him.

      Then if he fires you, you can sue him for wrongful termination.
      This will work even in a without cause state.

      I'd also recommend that a number of you get a lawyer. If you have an issue find a lawyer. If you plan to be a contractor, management, just planning on moving up the corporate ladder.
      Get a lawyer.
      Company lawyers are not there for you.
      And if you are worried about it , you can always ask your lawyer.
      Get someone you can trust.

    180. Re:Bide your time by Zirus · · Score: 1

      Blackmail does not require the demand or exchange of money. It can also refer to demanding specific services or actions be performed, as well. As long as you're demanding that somebody do something they might not otherwise do, and the demand is backed by a threat of some sort, it's blackmail.

      Wouldn't this mean that work is black mail?

      Boss: if you don't work your fired, and heres some money....

    181. Re:Bide your time by GringoChapin · · Score: 1

      Lawyer/Accountant - Hell no, I'm not getting disbarred/whatever for you guys, and furthermore there's not a lawyer/accountant in the country who will put their name on %dodgy_thing%, unless of course you buy lunch.

    182. Re:Bide your time by brainbuz · · Score: 1

      If you have another job lined up and haven't been at this job long, resign your position and drop a dime to the BSA for the reward. Even if you don't have a job lined up, you can resign a job because you've been asked to perform illegal activities and still be eligible for unemployment, but you'll need to document it, so you'll need to tactfully put your concerns in writing and maintain a file before dropping the dime. Leaving a job on bad terms can have repercussions for your career, so if not having this job on your resume leaves a big hole, you need to figure out how you'll compensate, one tactic is maintaining ties to other employees you can use as a reference -- most HR departments will only confirm employment and as soon as your gone you can have a friend at another company send a reference check to see what HR says. Even if you can leave this job off your resume, be prepared to answer questions about the job if you are subject to a background investigation for a future job.

      --
      minds, get scrambled like eggs, abused and erased. Hard Hearted Alice is who you want to see.
    183. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's a real sociopath, though, he may just fix things and then fire you anyway.

      Umm..., no? If he's a real sociopath, you'll end up dead and in a dumpster. Is "sociopath" the new "fascism?" Is it a word people just throw around to describe anything even slightly tilting away from their ideals of what is right and normal?

      The problem the guy is going to face with bringing the issue up now and in the way that has been proposed is, he's already brought the issue up in a way that's made it clear he thinks the company is doing something wrong. So, if he starts saying stuff like, "You know, the BSA offers rewards for people who turn in software pirates," what do you think his boss is going to read between those lines? He's going to assume the guy is saying that HE is the one who's going to call the BSA. So yeah, of course the guy's days are going to be numbered--he's essentially threatening his boss! What do you expect? Anyone is going to have a chip on his shoulder after that, not just a "sociopath."

    184. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't just stand there! Do something!!!

      OK... Um what?

      How in the hell should I know? Do I have to handle all the details for you? Be creative! I shouldn't have to hold your hand all the time! Just do it now, slacker! Think for yourself!

      Um... OK... Maybe I can post a question on Ask Slashdot and get some useful advice. More likely, though, I'll just get some retard telling me to figure it out on my own with no useful guidance...

    185. Re:Bide your time by MJMullinII · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I love how I'm marked "Troll" for stating an obvious fact.

      --
      "Don't be a martyr -- BE THE ONE WHO GOT AWAY!"
    186. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackmail involves demanding a benefit for covering up something.
      It's NOT blackmail to demand the perp "do the right thing", in this case buy the necessary licenses.

      We had a saying about this where I once worked - it's not a good career move to risk a multimillion dollar lawsuit if the company can afford to pay the millions. The average Joe can get by on the Kamikaze defence - "sue me and you won't even recoup lawyer costs". (Although the RIAA is trying to counter this tactic) It's another thing to be known as the guy that cost your company ten million dollars.

      Yes, it's tough to track every last license bought. However, if a company is big enough to be in this situation, then they have accounting records that will demonstrate every item purchased or reimbursed. If I see a habit of someone buying office and getting reimbursed every few months, or a regular habit of ordering office I (unlike the SWA auditors) might say "close enough". If there's no evidence they ever bought anything - hmmm... what are the odds.

      This is stupid too. The accounting question is usually a simple query or report. Unless the manager owns the company why should he put his butt on the line (and his career) for someone else's measly $600/employee? besides, that's what? Typically about 2 days' wages for an office worker? Why ruin your career for that? Especially when some disgruntled worker can easily spill the beans and get you audited? (If you own the company - all the more reason to come clean ASAP)

      the whole thing just reeks of dumb-dumb-dumb! DOs this manager have pointy hair?

    187. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Have you actually read the good advice given by many other people on this thread and have you been following this thread? Oh sorry this is /. you shoot from the hip and don't put a name on it so no one knows how lame your reply is. Sorry I asked.

    188. Re:Bide your time by sk999 · · Score: 1

      >

      Exactly, which must be why just yesterday I had to use OOOo on Linux to reformat a .ppt file created by MS Office on a MS Windows box so someone could read it using MS Office on a Mac. All in a corporate environment.

    189. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most jurisdictions, piracy evolves a damage of some sort to the rightful owner. This damage is only valid if it can be proven.

      For a company this is pretty easy to do. They pirate software X and use it in there daily business. That is pretty straight forward to prove that producers of software X helped the business make money but were not paid.

      In the non-comercial world of home computing this is entirly diffrent. Say a person downloads game Y. They play it some indeterminant amount of time. This person is playing the game without paying, BUT how do you prove that the person ever would have PAID FOR IT? That is the key, you have to prove that the person WOULD HAVE PURCHASED the product, but instead found a avenue around that purchase.

      A good example would be minesweeper. I play it all the time, a minute here a minute there. But there is no way in hell I would ever buy minesweeper. I would rather do something else if I have to pay for it (I would play hearts instead...).

      In the home use case the PROVABLE damages are $0.00.

    190. Re:Bide your time by cnvandev · · Score: 1

      Actually, no one can call themselves an "engineer" without applying for a license with the necessary professional organization. There are organizations which accredit software engineers, though it's not a requirement, but if you're a company that is worried about that, don't hire someone who isn't accredited.

    191. Re:Bide your time by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      It's working it's way there... slowly.

      My Uni's Software Engineering (and CS both, oddly enough) are ABET certified. Not much, but it's a start.

    192. Re:Bide your time by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      No, that is in keeping with my values. As a teacher, however, I often see my union lobbying the state legislature for changes to education policy that go directly against reasonable solutions, often focusing money on getting raises for teachers when the money would be better spent on having more teachers.

      Further, in an age when multiculturalism has high value, the union often opposes efforts to enhance this in a positive way, and instead promotes efforts that only promote multiculturalism on the surface. Environmental efforts are likewise apparently driven by special interests rather than concern over reasonable resource management. It has also recently taken to pushing public issues that have nothing to do with education on its members and the public.

      Thus, its lobbying policies and political affiliations are not to my liking. The only other union with similar insurance to which I can align myself (in my state at least) is effectively the same with only a different board of directors to distinguish it from the first.

    193. Re:Bide your time by geminidomino · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Don't give me this crap again, stop dancing around the wrongness of it with semantics. You are wrong it's criminal. I feel I have been stolen from when an unauthorized copy of my software is made

      No one gives a fuck about what you "feel", flower child. "Criminal" is real word with a real definition, yours ain't it.

      "Right and wrong" are orthogonal concepts to "legal and illegal".

    194. Re:Bide your time by erple2 · · Score: 1

      Boss - please do %dodgy_thing%.

      You're kidding me. MS person thinks their IT. I think you really want:

      Boss - please do ${dodgy_thing}

      There you go, problem solved. There's an open source solution to 80% fix of 100% of the problems.

    195. Re:Bide your time by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I would add: Document everything. Save any emails about software installations, make a spreadsheet contains: Name of Software, Key used, Installed on, Requested by.

      Check out Belarc Advisor for Windows machines. :)

      I never hesitate to violate an EULA since an EULA is worthless. Ever since I read the suggestion on here I have always amended such contracts with a post-it on the monitor to read "Right of first sale applies" and then click agree. I have the right to amend any contract prior to signing it. However, I don't and won't infringe on the copyright. Making backups and storing the original away or installing it twice on one PC for a dual boot is one thing, but installing it on 20 machines is entirely different.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    196. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this funny? If you had a union, they could file a grievance to force this scumbag company to clean up their act.

    197. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      Lawyers get busted for dodgy shit all the time.

      99% of the time it's incompetence or they're filling their own pockets.

      They don't stick their neck out for the CLIENT's incompetence, or the CLIENT's pockets, because they will be personally held accountable.

      When a lawyer fucks up bad enough to get the disbarment process running, the other lawyers can't throw him under the bus fast enough, because he's making the rest of them look bad.

    198. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      Exactly, when they get caught they get disbarred and can't be lawyers anymore.

      IT people just find another IT job.

      I'm not saying professional associations are a silver bullet, but wouldn't it be remove the very worst people from the field?

    199. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      Totally correct, and people get nailed to the wall for it.

      There used to be a ginormous accounting firm called Arthur Anderson LLP, until Enron imploded. What used to be a prestigious firm employing 85,000 people worldwide is now a smoking crater, because Anderson OK'd the Enron books, and they were held accountable (get it?) for signing off on bullshit.

      Lawyers get disbarred every day. Sometimes for crime, sometimes for incompetence.

      IT people don't get hammered the same way for incompetence.

    200. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you're the one that complained, they will naturally suspect you when the BSA or someone else shows up. Wait until someone gets fired or there's a tiff with the boss and an employee or something like that -- in other words, don't file a complaint until someone else there would have a reason to want to nail the boss, then file it so the timing makes it look like that person is complaining, not you.

      If the president of your company is insisting on action (or inaction) that you believe to be in breach of legal contracts, then the people to report this to are the company's directors, not the software vendors' legal agents. The aim is to correct an unwise corporate action (that is the responsibiltiy of the directors) not to decide "I'm gonna get this place sued".

    201. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      And managers are held in such esteem...

    202. Re:Bide your time by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      I'd been writing batch files for quite a few years before downloading my first set of Slackware floppy images... now get off my lawn.

    203. Re:Bide your time by spun · · Score: 1

      So, your suggestion is to either a.) assume the worst about your boss, sneak around behind his back, don't give him a chance to mend his ways, and screw the company over for profit after you've got your exit strategy in place; or b.) be a good little drone (and potential scapegoat) and let the Powerful People do whatever they want.

      Somehow, I still fell my advice is better.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    204. Re:Bide your time by spun · · Score: 1

      And you'd be screwed because of the documentation I'd sent to my lawyer.

      It almost sounds as if you are rooting for the boss on this one...

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    205. Re:Bide your time by couchslug · · Score: 1

      There is no moral obligation to a corrupt employer, but one needs sweet money buy groceries. Therefore, fuck the employer and obtain money.

      I'd drop the issue and start chatting with the BSA about deniably setting up my employer and getting a reward through a proxy. The tale of anguish over intellectual property coupled with fear of reprisal should find receptive ears. When one is dealing with malicious employers who want to throw you to the wolves, scheme calmly against them.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    206. Re:Bide your time by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      If the only thing that distinguishes you from other guys is you willingness to install unlicensed software on computers, you're not going to get far up the ladder anyway.

    207. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You understand the difference between "criminal offense" and "civil offense"? One can put you in jail, and the other can charge you fines. Copyright violations are the latter type.

    208. Re:Bide your time by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Then, after you find another job, report them to the BSA in exchange for a commission. You might as well make some money off the bastards.

    209. Re:Bide your time by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      No, because there are no unlawful claims or demands. In fact, doing anything other than the two options mentioned could be very harmful to himself.
      If anything, the employer is using extortion by saying "if you don't want to lose your job you better well ignore licenses".

    210. Re:Bide your time by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is pretty close to extortion, but aside from that, it's going to get him fired at an inopportune time.

      The best choice for this guy is to immediately look for a new job. This one is obviously not working out, and it would be idiotic for him to try to continue building his career there. He's probably already on their hit list for bringing this subject up. On the way out, he might as well report their asses to the BSA in exchange for a hefty reward. Normally I don't like the BSA's actions that much, but when a company is this stupid, they really deserve a giant fine.

    211. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is such a thing as criminal copyright infringement, and the OP's company might be far enough out of line that this is it. Don't assume it's a civil matter just because it's copyright.

    212. Re:Bide your time by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I find OOo more intuitive.

      I guess it just depends what you are used to.

      Of course, the issue on this thread was to install OOo if the company won't pay for the licensing of MSOffice. Up until you, there was no debate on which office suite was "better."

    213. Re:Bide your time by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say there's "no barrier to entry". As someone with a BS in IT, 5 years of experience, and a record of successful projects which cut and/or save costs in equipment and man hours, there most certainly is a barrier to entry. It's "are you employed?" If you're not employed, they don't seem to even consider you.

      No argument about "computer janitors" though. We're respected about as much as the janitors unless we're working in an IT shop, in which case we're a large enough proportion that respect has to be begrudgingly given.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    214. Re:Bide your time by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      ...such as the zip utility built into Windows Explorer itself.

    215. Re:Bide your time by Ka+D'Argo · · Score: 1

      "No barriers to entry".

      Seriously? Check out some of my replies to job related topics on /. over the years. It took me almost 5 years after college to find a job in the I.T. field, and that job being at the bottom rung of anything tech related, telephone based technical support.

      There are so many barriers, it's not even funny anymore. Most basic I.T. jobs are requiring a 4 year degree, 2-3 years experience, a spreadsheet listing's worth of Certifications, etc. Granted, I could have spent a few more years going to a nice 4 year college after having saved up the money working a retail job, to get that degree and such, but that's not really "entry level" at that point.

      Maybe it's par for the course, or at least becoming that way, but lets not bullshit a bullshitter, there are obvious barriers in the I.T. field. And thats not even counting places that might secretly discriminate on age, race, etc (I've seen people in their 50's with a metric shit ton of experience be passed over for that 20-something who coasted his way through an Associates).

      Some of us got into I.T. for the love of technology. Prior to the economy diving, I could have gotten a job at Wal Mart or some place. Yes, for vastly less money, but I'd rather work with technology at least in some fashion, I like problem solving. Maybe with work and effort, I can make a career of it.

      --
      Aw Frell this
    216. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Criminal is indeed a real word and if you get caught there are indeed real world consequences. The DMCA comes with many real world penalties and they are indeed criminal. So if I'm a "Flower Child" what's that make you? The Man? kind of ironical with a certain truthiness to it dontcha think! Besides, GET OFF MY LAWN.

    217. Re:Bide your time by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      If you already have another job lined up, why bother with this little game? After all, if you threaten an exec with ratting out the company you will not have that job for very long anyway so you'd better take the other one lined up. You would be better off taking the other job, telling him why you left, and....if you really feel the need to...notifying the BSA.

    218. Re:Bide your time by kklein · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is that Slashdot has a whole lot of Ayn Rand Assholes floating around. These are people who need to think that they are superior to other people because they worship the magical market, and that it is their job to be exploited because the people above them are better people. To admit that they are being taken advantage of would be to act like "leeches."

      Folks, people who do very little and who, despite what they claim, have no particular risk suck up most of your money. Organizations are team efforts, and while I think it's clear that those at the top should make more than those at the bottom, the vast armies of mid- and lower-level workers deserve a much bigger cut of the pie. There is no organization without them--just a bunch of sociopaths having a circle-jerk in a boardroom. "Men of talent" like to believe they don't need "mediocrites," but they most certainly do. An economy only exists when everyone is playing.

      I have been contemplating joining a union myself. The Japanese education industry is starting to do some pretty crazy things--things that have become commonplace in the US, to the detriment of our system. They are attempting to keep us all on one-year contracts. This is a great deal for them, because they can fire people as enrollment rises and falls, but it means that one never knows if he can finish a research project--research being a type of marketing for a university, so it's not just for the researcher--and makes it very hard to get started. Furthermore, it hurts loyalty and productivity. When my school asks me to do things, the zeal with which I do it has a lot to do with my contract length. Getting involved in a project and then coming to the end of your contract and being let go hurts the project and makes one feel like they have been cheated (it's happened to me). Furthermore, to make sure that they are being fair, schools hold tight to the number of contract renewals they say you can have. It doesn't matter how beneficial your presence, they open themselves to legal liability if they let you stay, because someone else who isn't may sue. There was actually a panic and scramble at the end of my contract at my last place, because there was no one who could replace me. My boss tried to work out a deal to keep me, but administration made the (absolutely correct) liability point and off I went, and the project died after lots of time and money spent.

      COLLECTIVE BARGAINING FIXES PROBLEMS LIKE THIS.

      There is nothing wrong with asserting yourself and demanding a bigger cut of the pie--executives do it all the time! That's business!

    219. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That the law is wrong? That ethical and moral values are completely unrelated concepts to the law?

      By the way, you are making it clear that you don't understand copyright either. Copyright controls distribution, Use restrictions are only enforced under EULAs which are contracts more or less of questionable validity. If you're still thinking "so?" which I'm willing to bet you are, it means that only the people making copies available for download are doing something illegal, the people who receive those downloads are not distributing therefore they are not infringing your copyright.

      Yeah, oops.

    220. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lawyer - Hell no, I'm not getting disbarred/whatever for you guys, and furthermore there's not a lawyer in the country who will put their name on %dodgy_thing%.

      You're kidding right?

      See, that's why we use Car analogies.

      -Arc

    221. Re:Bide your time by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Encourage Legal FOSS instead.

      WinZip/WinRAR? 7-Zip, please!

      Pirated Office 2000/2003? OpenOffice.

    222. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's as spineless as you describe, he's working at the right company to start with.

      First try to legitimize their current software through purchasing as suggested earlier. Document your requests and the results.

      If your Reqs get shot down, don't wait for someone else to report the problem. Get a new job and report them yourself, as soon as possible. Don't wait for these ass-hats to fuck up your career.

    223. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would be equally deprived of profit when a used copy of your software is purchased. Is the buyer a criminal in that case as well?

    224. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need a corollary to Godwin's law: Any discussion of copyright will degenerate into a random sequence of bad analogies and misunderstanding of the law.

      Get back on topic and tell our OP what he should do in the current legal and business environment. Stop moaning about how things SHOULD be. If you want to change copyright, vote for the libertarian party (or any party other than Dems or Reps) in your next congressional election.

    225. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there is a difference. In the later case, you ARE committing it. In the first case, you may or may not be committing it. Especially when you raised it to higher up and they ignore you.

    226. Re:Bide your time by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So -- the boss is a crook. Not on the level of a literal pirate, of course, but he's a sneak, the kind of liar who thinks pretending not to see something in plain sight means denying it was there isn't a lie.

      What in the world makes you think he isn't planning to pin this on you?

      OK, we all know that won't get him out of it, but he's just demonstrated that he isn't exactly the world's sharpest thinker. People like that have a way of being just clever enough to make your life hell. And "anonymous" wants to know how to *fix* this situation? It's like listening to a woman tell you all the iron clad proof that her husband is cheating on her, then have her ask whether you think he might be seeing someone else. The fact that she has to ask tells you everything you need to know.

      The number one cause of *serious* unhappiness at work, in my experience, is being forced to do something makes you feel like you don't have integrity. "Integrity" isn't some management buzz-word like "excellence". It's something that's very dear to any reasonably healthy human mind. Integrity is, of course, matching word to deed, doing what you said you will, and being truthful about what you have done. True, we all tell little white lies, but when something bothers you, it's wise to listen to that feeling, because it means that the lies aren't so white anymore. That's when it goes beyond how you present yourself to customers and vendors who ought to know the game. That's when begin to doubt that you are the person you thought you were. Unless you've got to pay your kid's chemotherapy bills or something like that, there's now way that's worth it. Every time you give into that, it's like you kill yourself a little bit. Keep it up and pretty soon your body will be walking around doing your master's bidding, but practically speaking nobody will be home. You'll be nothing more than another soul-less drone slaving away, wiling to endure any indignity for a paycheck.

      This is a hell of an economy to say this, but when you're miserable because the people you work for are managing in the world of make-believe, maybe your purely monetary self-interest and your self-respect aren't in conflict after all. What would you rather say in a few years, "I did all kinds of stupid things for that idiotic company, then it crashed and burned and I spent years and thousands of dollars to make the problems go away," or "I thought what they were doing was wrong so I quit. I had a hell of a time making ends meet for a few months, but I did what I thought was right." Speaking as a former manager, all the biggest headaches I had were from people who didn't have the integrity to face up to a problem. The honest engineers working for me might not *tell* me a happy story, but they consistently delivered more than I thought they could when things got rough. The other guys simply made the problems worse. I have no patience for make-believe in management, because sooner or later it catches up from you and exacts a price you can't pay.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    227. Re:Bide your time by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1
      At the university I worked for you had the option of joining the union and paying 1% of your salary towards union dues, or not joining and paying a 1% services charge. After several months of employment, all union members got an across the board $500/yr raise, before the annual 3-4% cost of living raise and annual 3-4% discretionary raise. Non-union members did not get the $500, nor did they get that increase calculated into their other annual raises.

      There's also a story of a professional who, for 8 years, was present for 8 hours a day, and no one knew what he did. After his bosses changed, the new boss gave him an unsatisfactory review, and he was fired. He got a job at another university, and for two years, the union fought on his behalf, disagreeing with the reason for his termination. After all, he had 8 years of satisfactory reviews, and suddenly with a new boss he fails all categories? Long story short, when the legal battle ended, the employee received 2 years back pay, and the option of returning to his do-nothing job.

      The only downside to a union I can possibly see (from an employee perspective) is if you are in a position that is prohibited from striking. If the union calls a strike, it gets very messy and could cost individual employees thousands in fines, like the 2005 NYCTA strike.

    228. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The double standards can easily be legally addressed if it's a felony crime. Misprison is a legal term for failing to report a felony when you observe one in action. If the pirating actually could count as a felony charge, then saying nothing could get you into more trouble then looking for a new job.

      Most or some states have misprison charges that relate to serious misdemeanors also. Some of these states will have copyright laws dealing with piracy too. My suggestion is to cover your own ass and if in doubt, seek competent legal council as your job may be protected under whistle blower laws as well. Either way, if you do nothing, your still taking a huge risk and attempting to cover your own ass could be what cooks it.

    229. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      post

      You're kidding right?

      Surprisingly, yes - But there's an enormous difference between morally dodgy and Lawyer-dodgy.

    230. Re:Bide your time by selven · · Score: 1

      Oh lord, do we have to bring out the copyright infringement is not theft brigade again?

    231. Re:Bide your time by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Open Office works really well for me, I have been using it for many years with out any problems and prefer it of 'to annoyingly unhelpful' M$ office and document compatibility of Open Office over the long term is really helpful (last version I bothered with M$O was 97).

      Obviously in a work place where piracy is a problem shifting them to free open source solutions makes sense as it is pretty obvious they will not pay for proprietary software licences. Of course the system admin should make the switch and focus on providing more support for the free open source solutions and as much as possible leave the pirates to fend for themselves.

      Resolving the 'we pirate everything' office is more of a long term goal, application by application done over years and initial priority is to de-pirate hardware you are directly responsible for to ensure that should they finally get caught holding the bag. Keeping in mind copyright in the office content with no for profit redistribution is a civil rather than criminal and nothing to get too uptight about.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    232. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true student. Lots of people have something called responsibilities.
      If you have a mortgage to pay, and kids to feed, then that comes first. It's a simple fact that most people cannot afford to risk their job on ethics. So a lot of people are a member of the "good ol' boys club" of the employed, and need to keep it that way.

      It's too easy to call them spineless, because in the end it is how far will you go to keep feeding your familiy. And for most installing pirated software at work is not crossing the line.

    233. Re:Bide your time by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      No. You document everything now that you've opened your fat mouth. Look for another job and when you're reasonably sure you have another job go to the president and tell them you're taking that to the BSA. Make sure your new job starts the next day. ;)

      Now if you want to blackmail them you're on you're own. You may feel better about informing on them and probably have a better job as any company that is that much of a cheap ass in my experience treats their people like crap.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    234. Re:Bide your time by u38cg · · Score: 1
      In the UK, get together a respected group of people in your target group, form a not-for-profit association, develop a set of rules and criteria for professional membership, and apply for a Royal Charter from HM. Congratulations, you are now a profession.

      The main criteria for something to be a profession is that it benefits society above and beyond the individual members and can have an impact on public discourse. In this day and age, such a test should not be hard to meet.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    235. Re:Bide your time by nobodie · · Score: 1

      I work in China where not only is piracy rampant (most large universities run a single ghosted copy of windows that was probably a Russian pirate to start with ). I use this as an opening to explain that this is why I use FOSS, because there are alternatives that are free and also ( and this is the kicker) show respect to Asian people. You may wonder what that is about. MS versions that are licensed in China are often crippled by design. Windows XP for example is sometimes missing "accessories" or "system tools" or some of the basic tools one expects to find. MS Office is even more unusually crippled. You cannot, for example, "left justify" in MS Word that is sold in China. So, while piracy was more rampant in Thailand when I lived there, the Chinese market was targetted for crippleware by MS and others (Nero ) for example, not to mention antivirus companies. The Thais would buy stuff in the US and then crack it and sell it on $2.50 CD packed with 25 or 30 programs. So, your workplace is a good place to evangelize and if possible just use the FOSS alternative because it is better and easier to work with. I use that approach here and so far I get nothing but thanks for my efforts, especially when I include appropriate language packs.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    236. Re:Bide your time by bradley13 · · Score: 1

      Good heavens, don't feed the BSA. Sure, this business has a slimeball for a boss. Feeding him to even bigger slimeballs is not the answer. Finding another job is.

      --
      Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    237. Re:Bide your time by jacqueman · · Score: 1

      Well, according to bsa.org, the BSA offers up to $1,000,000 for reporting piracy. Now, it seems that that's only in severe circumstances, but surely if you can get another job lined up, then it's probably a good idea to report them — they'll almost certainly give you something that makes it worth your time. And, they're blatantly breaking the law. You've brought it to the attention of your superior, and he ignored you. Also, if the BSA catches them anyways, they'll almost certainly try and pin the blame on you. So, not only will you have a serious chance of jailtime if youdon't report them, someone _else_ will get the reward. I guess I'm just saying that, really, you have everything to gain by reporting them — and everything to lose by not doing so.

    238. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Look for free alternatives and try to get them implemented. For example, 7-Zip is a free alternative to WinZip and works just as well. There are alternatives to MS-Office, but depending on what features your users make use of they may not be equivalent.

      However, if you cannot effect any reasonable change in attitude you may want to look for work elsewhere. Then turn in your former employers and collect a little extra cash from the settlement. The only potential snag would be if you personally installed the pirated software, in which case you probably better have records of you telling your employer that you don't want to do it and them telling you to do it anyway. Otherwise you might find yourself getting sued for "setting them up" to get busted and profiting from it.

    239. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And enron wasn't that long ago. The accountant substitution doesn't work either.

      -sk

    240. Re:Bide your time by kunwon1 · · Score: 1

      sbeckstead is a troll. You're all feeding the troll.
      STOP FEEDING THE TROLL.

      --
      Specialization is for insects. -Heinlein
    241. Re:Bide your time by iminanalog · · Score: 1

      If you're being fired for being in essence a "whistleblower", this could be considered wrongful termination and is illegal in most states. Even in most "at will" states wrongful termination is still applicable.

    242. Re:Bide your time by iminanalog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Haha I love Ayn Rand, but I agree that these people take her belief system too far. Her ideas work in a book because it is not the reality. Maybe one day it will get there, but today it's not and you have to make a compromise to live happily.

    243. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually done this. I worked for a loon like the one described by the OP. He wasn't interested in buying the software even after I made him aware of the reward for turnin him in. He didn't like my attitude, so he did end up firing me - I did collect unemployment and did turn him into the SPA. I made the decision to turn him in anonymously and without reward though because it felt like the most ethical thing to do.

    244. Re:Bide your time by northstarlarry · · Score: 1

      It's not really a frame-up, though: you're not doing something bad and blaming it on someone else, you're doing a good thing, expecting that there will be improper retaliation, and redirecting that retaliation to where it can't do any harm anyways.

      If the management at the poster's company think that someone they fired is "causing trouble" and try to harm that person's ability to get another job (pretty much the only thing they can do to a person who they've fired), the fired person can probably mount a successful lawsuit under federal employment law, and management will know that. On the other hand, management can make life miserable for the poster, still employed at the company, under any number of excuses that the poster would have a hard time proving are retaliatory.

    245. Re:Bide your time by Surt · · Score: 1

      Less likely for a lawyer to behave criminally than an IT employee? Good god, what companies have you been working for?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    246. Re:Bide your time by Surt · · Score: 1

      The problem is that IT is in its infancy. There's no widespread agreement about the correct way to do software design, it's not like bridge building where the right way to do things is well known (and note that bridges STILL fail!).

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    247. Re:Bide your time by rbrander · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU for the GQ link. What a great article.

    248. Re:Bide your time by somersault · · Score: 1

      Haha yeah.. they're probably all running on pirated copies of Windows 95 or something

      --
      which is totally what she said
    249. Re:Bide your time by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Okay, most of us on this site are involved somehow in IT, consulting, or software development.

      If everyone "pirated"[sic] your product, how would you eat, make your car payments, your mortgage, and take your girlfriend out on a date? I know, I'm stretching when I assume you're not living free in your mother's basement (this is /. after all) but bear with me. If no one is buying your employer will go out of business. It's not like we're recording artists and can make up for giving product out for free by touring, and most people don't need support most of the time for commodity apps.

      Admit it: even though you may not be stealing, strictly speaking, if you're copying software and installing it on 20 workstations at work without paying for it, you are potentially depriving people of earning a living. I don't see much of a problem with downloading an app to learn it (increasing mindshare of an app) but putting it into production is something else entirely.

      Being a professional in IT and software I either buy the software (sometimes I'll have friends who are faculty or staff purchase academic software for me for personal use but it is legal - right of first sale allows them to transfer ownership) and every 2-3 years I buy an MSDN subscription so I usually have access to the latest Microsoft software to keep my skills up to date. All the same though, my platform of choice is Linux+KDE for daily use, and most of my software is F/OSS - totally unencumbered. Software I have to use on Windows has been purchased legally (or came "free"[sic] with appliances or peripherals).

      You may not be stealing in the legal sense, but in a very practical sense you are stealing because you are depriving someone of a living, either by reducing sales which reduces bonuses and even salaries, or prevents the creation of new jobs.

      In summary: I agree in the legal sense that you are not stealing. In a moral sense, you are.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    250. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point he will either become furious and fire you on the spot, gaining you some unemployment, or he will fix things. If he's a real sociopath, though, he may just fix things and then fire you anyway. It's probably best to pull this after you have another potential job lined up.

      Tell this guy nothing -- he's already shown his colors by blowing you off previously. He knows damned well what's up and has made his choice. Trust me -- I've worked for such assholes.

      Do some research. Find out what the BSA bounty is -- fixed price or percentage of findings. Find out and document what federal or state protections are available to whistleblowers. You may need this when the dust settles if he threatens you with firing, demotes you or takes other negative actions. Let him know it's his call if he wants to go to the expense of yet another court action.

      By all means, document the crap out of everything you can find; you don't want to be in a he-said-she-said situation. Make sure you're still on board when the investigation happens. You don't want a confrontation, followed by evidence destruction as soon as you're offsite.

      As the other guy said, at worst make them fire you so you pick up the unemployment. Don't let go with both hands -- have another job lined up -- that would be better than unemployment anyway. Be aware that, depending on circumstances and connections, taking such action may get you blackballed locally, so it could be hard to find a new job if you haven't already secured a firm commitment.

      Be very careful what you say in front of witnesses -- threats to expose the operation could be twisted into a charge of extortion if they can be corroborated.

    251. Re:Bide your time by HBoar · · Score: 1

      I thought the comment more implied that by timing the complaint in such a manner, the boss would have two suspects: You, and the 'framed' individual. Since there would be no way for the boss to know which one was guilty, he could not take action against either of them. Well, in theory....

    252. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they found something questionable, they e-mailed the person whose workstation it was, asking them to either remove the software or provide a license for it.

      I worked for a similar outfit. But they announced the sweeps some time in advance.

      On one occasion, we received a notice from the IT manager that systems would be audited within the next three weeks. We were told that, in the case of non-company-issued software, we should have licenses on hand to show we were using a legit copy.

      Then, at the end, he said that, OTOH, even if we had a license for it, and enjoyed playing it during lunchtime, we might want to uninstall "Leather Goddesses of Phobos" for a month or so if we'd be embarrassed to have the IT department made aware of our gaming choices.

    253. Re:Bide your time by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of what you say, however I was speaking strictly in the legal sense because that is a whole lot more cut and dried than getting into the moral implications. I am an IT professional myself and only use legally purchased software on all of my machines. I do not condone pirating software, but I hate it when people refer to copyright infringement as "theft", or imply that installing a copy of software you didn't purchase is going to land you in jail. It just isn't true.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    254. Re:Bide your time by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      The DMCA does not apply if I install the same piece of software multiple times on to different machines. That again, is a simple copyright violation. If you do not circumvent any DRM (or if the software has no DRM) then the DMCA does not apply. If you are a programmer who makes cracks and puts them out, then the DMCA could come after you. But simply installing software when you have no license to do so is not a DMCA violation. For a software developer, you seem to have a pretty vague understanding of copyright law.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    255. Re:Bide your time by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      In this case, it is blackmail, as it's quite clearly a case of saying "buy these licenses, or I go to the police".

      He's stating that he believes the CEO is a liar. If the CEO isn't a liar, then the CEO should fire him and go about his day. If the CEO lied to his employee in order to prevent him from doing his job legally, then the police would find something. Remember, the CEO claimed he is in compliance. His "blackmail" restated is nothing other than "I believe your documentation on this matter incomplete. If the documentation isn't up to standards, I will call for an external audit at no cost to you, and they will get the documentation up to standards for free." IF the CEO isn't a criminal liar running a felonious conspiracy, then he wouldn't care either way. If he is a criminal, then he certainly wouldn't want the authorities allerted. But none of that is blackmail. It's a warning to a criminal that he will be turned in. Nothing more.

      Or do you think "If I ever catch you robbing a bank, I'll turn you in" to be blackmail as well?

    256. Re:Bide your time by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Wow, nice theory, but I have yet to see that work IRL. Why? Because they already HAVE the software they want, and as far as they are concerned it is FREE. The only way this is ever gonna change at a place like that is if they get bit in the ass by the BSA. Sorry but its true.

      I worked at a place that had a BSA raid. The IT director cut his budget by pirating software. He didn't tell anyone (small shop). When he left, it was discovered. While in the process of fixing it, they were raided. He caused the problem alone, then turned them in to collect the reward for a problem he created, and the company was actively fixing it at the time. Sometimes in companies, there really is one bad actor that causes problems. You either have to trust your employees, or not. Though, when they fired him for stealing company equipment and selling it on eBay, they should have figured something might have happened...

    257. Re:Bide your time by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What in the world makes you think he isn't planning to pin this on you?

      Pin what? The BSA doesn't sue employees. It doesn't matter who in the organization did what. The company will be the one paying, not the CEO, and not the IT guy. The only time this isn't the case is if criminal charges are considered, and that's extraordinally rare, and wouldn't happen unless the CEO was selling the pirated disks out the back door.

    258. Re:Bide your time by GunpowderTreason · · Score: 1

      What are the Boy Scouts of America going to do about this? I assume the author is already a Boy Scout if he's looking to turn in his business.

    259. Re:Bide your time by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see an school + apprenticeship model in IT btw.

      I agree. The less experienced often get mentored anyway, we just need it a bit more formalized.

      This used to be enforced by guilds. In modern times, the closest we have to this are large unions, but those are relatively controversial.

    260. Re:Bide your time by tomstorey · · Score: 1

      I too have also secured a job after explaining to my new employer that I left my previous employer due to "things that were happening that shouldnt be, and things that werent happening that should have been." That was the extent of it, I didnt go into detail, but it didnt seem to have any negative impact on my prospects. They hired me for my experience rather than whether I had anything good to say about my previous employer or not.

    261. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you've never spoken to BSA before. They want affidavits, not anonymity... ;-)

    262. Re:Bide your time by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      >> I feel I have been stolen from when an unauthorized copy of my software is made.

      I went to your blog, because I was interested in finding out just what program you'd written that was so heavily pirated. Not only could I not find the program, but every six seconds of the nightmarish slog was punctuated with "Poker: How To Beat No-Limit Hold Em 6-max Cash Games".

      Now *I* feel robbed.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    263. Re:Bide your time by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      if I were a manager and one of my employees came to me with an ultimatum like that, I'd fire them on the spot.

      If you were a manager and you were to fire them on the spot - you'd likely find yourself in deep doo-doo. In most jurisdictions there are laws that protect employees in these situations and levy huge penalties for retaliation of that sort.

    264. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      certain ones yes, some are criminal and will land you in jail for quite a while. Especially under the DMCA.

    265. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Yeah oops my ass, under US law both are liable for the offense.

    266. Re:Bide your time by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Ask Psystar! they just got busted for it!

    267. Re:Bide your time by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Really? Pystar took a copy of Office and installed it on multiple computers? Shame on them.

      Nice strawman. Again your grasp of the law is minimal at best. The Pystar case has nothing to do with what we were talking about. DMCA has to do with circumventing security measures in the software, which Pystar did. Simply installing software without defeating any DRM is simply a civil copyright violation, and not criminal.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    268. Re:Bide your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's a sneak, the kind of liar who thinks pretending not to see something in plain sight means denying it was there isn't a lie

      I think you've just described every member of management everywhere! :)

    269. Re:Bide your time by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      First, I never said OOo was better, or even equal to MS Office. I actually prefer MS Office 2007 myself, but rarely use it. I do know people who prefer OOo and those who prefer MSO. As to winzip, the built in options aren't very good. 7zip is a much better utility imo. As to the GIMP, if you're running Windows, I'd check out Paint .Net, it's pretty nice for most common editing chores, it's no Photoshop, but it's really nice. I usually reach for it for quick edits.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    270. Re:Bide your time by shentino · · Score: 1

      What do you do if the minute you bring it up they fire you and cite the illegal software as the reason for termination?

    271. Re:Bide your time by ploxiln · · Score: 1

      Go ahead and call me an Ayn Rand Asshole, but I think employers should be able to fire employees, and conversely, employees should be able to quit.

      It sounds to me like your problem is that your employer can be sued for keeping you hired for a longer term, due to some sort of "fairness" issue. You have no need for a union to get you a multi-year contract if your employer likes what you do. Engineers with no long-term-employment contract often work for one company for tens upon tens of years at a time! I have no problem with people unionizing in general, and they should be free to do it. But I wouldn't do it, because often these unions create more of these "fairness" issues that disrupt mutually beneficial arrangements between employers and employees.

      PS I actually no nothing about Ayn Rand.

    272. Re:Bide your time by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      In this scenario it would be pretty safe to assume most of the software was in place before he took the job. So it really depends on where you live, there are all kinds of wrongful termination laws and regulations that vary from state to state. So the possibility arises for a wrongful termination suite and then if you want to eat your cake too; report them as so many others have suggested.Truthfully if the company you work for does that you are better off without them. Even in this economy. Better to be unemployed than thrown under a bus when the sh*t hits the wall.

  2. Put this as the boss' start-up. by SQLGuru · · Score: 0

    Have this video play every time the boss logs in -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up863eQKGUI

    Best to do it in the registry and not the start-up folder because most users have no clue how to stop something from running when it's in the registry.

    1. Re:Put this as the boss' start-up. by cromar · · Score: 1

      How 'bout the IT Crowd piracy ad? Too bad it's only for movies...

      P.S. It's just a small business, give 'em a break. If they don't care that they are breaking the law, why should you?

    2. Re:Put this as the boss' start-up. by walterbyrd · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Put this as the boss' start-up. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      P.S. It's just a small business, give 'em a break. If they don't care that they are breaking the law, why should you?

      I simply remind the CEO that each infraction would cost us $10k in fines per infraction if we were audited due to a disgruntled employee. Which makes that $500 license suddenly look a lot less expensive.

      At the same time, we're moving as fast as possible away from software that requires licenses. The major pieces that we still pay for? Windows XP/7, MS Office, and really useful tools like JASC PaintShop Pro, UltraEdit32 and SecureCRT. Everything else has been moved to free tools where we don't have to track licenses.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    4. Re:Put this as the boss' start-up. by GenSec · · Score: 1

      P.S. It's just a small business, give 'em a break. If they don't care that they are breaking the law, why should you?

      Because, given some bad luck, he could end up in jail together with, or even instead of, his boss?

    5. Re:Put this as the boss' start-up. by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      The OP should care because he's probably gonna be the one who's ass the company serves up on a platter when the BSA comes calling.

    6. Re:Put this as the boss' start-up. by FishOuttaWater · · Score: 1

      What is this "floppy" object they describe? ...and, "manuals." What were these things?

    7. Re:Put this as the boss' start-up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny Video, but in all seriousness this is the largest human rights violation and most important political movement in history. Our freedom against corporate fascism in a failing capitalist economy is at stake.

  3. Since you brought it up... You're liable by charleste · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unfortunately ignorance of the law is no defense. The same is true for not saying anything when you witness a crime being committed. It's called obstruction. So, CYA: leave the company as soon as you can. Assume you WILL be held accountable in the future.

    1. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Document everything and call the BSA otherwise you could be thrown under the bus.

      https://reporting.bsa.org/usa/home.aspx

    2. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Incorrect, in numerous states you are not legally required to act when witnessing a crime. I know was the case in Nevada, your state may vary.

    3. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by servognome · · Score: 1

      The employee is knowingly a member of an organization engaged in criminal activity, and has actively participated so they are at risk of prosecution.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    4. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by dch24 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a reason you posted this AC.

      The BSA is almost as sociopathic as the Company President in the slashdot summary. If you go to them, expect to be blackballed just as surely as if the company got ratted out by someone else and you took the blame.

      Would you work for a company that stole cars to maintain its motor pool - and you are the head of the Motor Pool Division? Time to find a new job. Times are tough, but jail time is worse.

    5. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately ignorance of the law is no defense. The same is true for not saying anything when you witness a crime being committed. It's called obstruction.

      What shithole of a country do you live in? And who are the idiots who modded you insightful?

      In the USA, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT. Any idiot who watches TV cop shows knows that.

      You do not have to say ANYTHING about a crime that you witness. Otherwise a criminal would be obligated to talk about the crime they witnessed (IE, the crime they committed), and the fifth amendment therefore means nothing.

      Now, while YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT and say nothing, lying to the police about a crime you witnessed MIGHT be obstruction.

    6. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant. If the BSA comes calling, do you think this guy's boss is going to admit he was warned? Of course not. It's all 'that IT-guy's fault.

      If the poster has his complaints in writing, that might help him. Maybe.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    7. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On top of that police are not REQUIRED to help you, very compelling true story of girls in new york who were repeatadly raped for hours before the guys just up and left, multiple 911 calls were made. This has been held up many times that hte police are not required to help you at all.

    8. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      The same is true for not saying anything when you witness a crime being committed. It's called obstruction.

      No it's not. You are under no obligation to report misdemeanors. And if you fail to report a felony, it's called misprision, not obstruction. And it's only punishable if you actually attempt to conceal it, as opposed to just not reporting it. (I speak only of federal law, as I don't care about doing a 50-state survey here.)

    9. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by tomtomtom · · Score: 1

      I'd be extremely surprised if software piracy is a crime in this setting. It's merely civil liability for the company, so these types of laws don't apply. Perhaps the company could try to sue you for damages if they themselves get sued by the copyright owners but it's pretty simple to CYA in that case. Tell TPTB in the company (internally) that they are probably liable and make sure that you doing so is documented.

    10. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inaction is never obstruction, because obstruction must be an action. The only exception is if you are literally asked to move out of the way and refuse. The worry is being considered an accessory. The expectations that a bystander "do something" grows stronger as the cost of doing something drops. For example, knowing for years that Bernie Madoff was running a ponzi scheme but never reporting it would not be a great legal position. But it would be nothing compared to having the same knowledge and having profited in any indirect way by it. Which any employee is doing since they get paid by the company.

      Don't forget, though, that this is highly unlikely to be a criminal case. The BSA doesn't give a rip about finger-pointing. They go after the money regardless of fault. The company is the one that will get forked over, not the IT guy. Nor should he worry about individual criminal charges.

    11. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by MarkvW · · Score: 2, Informative

      Parent advice is BAD. If no duty is imposed upon an actor, most states do not impose liability for simply knowing of the commission of a crime and remaining silent.

      Don't rely on this email for legal advice. Don't rely on parent's email for legal advice. Don't rely on ANYTHING in slashdot for legal advice.

    12. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      since that is the case i would come in to work on a weekend when nobody else is around and wipe the offending software off of every PC and install a free alternative (anonymously and in secret if possible)

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    13. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      >The same is true for not saying anything when you witness a crime being committed.

      He made management aware of the situation. It's the company's problem now, and since he's an agent of the company, it's highly doubtful that he bears any personal liability.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    14. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      The BSA is almost as sociopathic as the Company President in the slashdot summary.

      Indeed. The way to fix pirated software is not to go the BSA, it is to convince the company that the BSA is sociopathic, and will eventually show up if they don't straighten things out.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    15. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this guy is actively helping copyright infringement when he supports and reinstalls the software.

      There really is no case that actually would be made against him, though. The BSA will show up and rape the company out of existence, but they don't bother with individual employees.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    16. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Then you're going to jail for sure - wiping apps off a company's machine without auth? That might even be a felony.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    17. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      He's clearly acting in good faith, since the company should not be using the software in the first place. As an employee in charge of software he also has implicit permission to log in and make changes.

    18. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      i give up, its a catch-22 you're damned if you do and damned if you don't, i am going to quit and get a job flipping hamburgers

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    19. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by pla · · Score: 1

      Wow, tons of armchair lawyers in this thread.

      Note: IANAL.


      Unfortunately ignorance of the law is no defense.

      Not always true, but not relevant to the discussion.


      The same is true for not saying anything when you witness a crime being committed. It's called obstruction.

      In the US, with the exception of a very small number of situations where child safety presents an issue, you never have an obligation to report knowledge of a crime unless issued a relevant subpoena.

      Now, if you in some way profit from the crime in question (arguably relevant here, but I'd call it a stretch), or outright lie to police or a court, you (may) have committed crimes of your own. But not volunteering unsolicited evidence of a crime does not constitute "obstruction of justice".


      So, CYA: leave the company as soon as you can. Assume you WILL be held accountable in the future.

      So to protect himself from the fictional crime of not reporting a crime, you would recommend he run away and do his best Sgt. Schultz impersonation? Priceless.

    20. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      The common advice is to GTFO and call the BSA, largely because the guy at the top seems to be in on the unlicensed software. If it were me, I'd stay long enough to line up a different job.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    21. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than ignorance of the law being no defense, this is entirely false. A crime committed by one person does not give rise to a responsibility for reporting that crime.

    22. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by MrZaius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're liable, but you could fix it.

      Would recommend the asker take three tacts simultaneously:

      1: Call a lawyer to verify that the below oughta work.
      2: Move everything you can away from proprietary platforms, but be realistic - You'll just end up canned if you start replacing desktops and office suites without serious buy-in from all levels of the company, but they'd have to be braindead not to let you at least get the servers legal for free. Likewise, 7zip over Winzip, etc. Thorough implementation of step 2 can, hopefully, greatly lessen the cost of step 3.
      3: Don't call the BSA - Call the nearest Microsoft sales rep and ask him to come in and give you a price on a site license to get you legal. Let them decide if they care about what's going on if management tells them where they can put it, but I'd be surprised if they did. Right now they're just hearing from some lowly service provider. Get the vendor on site, and they're staring at a multi-billion dollar behemoth that's capable of pursuing legal action against them but all but certainly won't if you play ball

      Whistleblowers deserve some protection, but when there's means available to get a company caught up on their licenses without bringing in the imminent risk of major lawsuits/in a way that's beneficial all 'round and you still call in the trade-group-police, you're doing your employer a grave disservice. Again, go to the vendor first. There's no way to be 100% sure this will work and allow you to keep your job, but it's worth trying before you jump ship.

    23. Re:Since you brought it up... You're liable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not going to jail for installing pirated copies of Office.

  4. Contact the BSA & request an audit by mandark1967 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They have a rewards program that will pay you money for turning in your company.

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    1. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by SpuriousLogic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just report it. The burned hand teaches best. Think how pissed your president would be if he found out the software his company built was being pirated. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

    2. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep, do it. Take the money as a little reward for dong the right thing..

      What will happen to the company is: Microsoft will send a letter to the CEO informing him that they will be performing an audit, that they are entitled to do as he is running some form of Microsoft software (I doubt they need to check that's true). Then they will tell him that he needs to run audit software in the company and send the results to MS, and that they know of a few companies who will perform this audit for a reasonable fee, and no, running it all yourself of not acceptable.

      Once he's done that, they will check how many licences they think the company needs to become 'compliant' and demand proof they have that many purchased. At this point, they also offer to bill for unlicenced software that accidentally or mistakenly was installed.

      End result: the company pays to audit itself, and pays MS for a load of licences. Usually they end up paying extra for things people have installed but never use any more.

      They're quite nice about it, if that help any.

    3. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't work quite like this. Microsoft has no more right to demand an audit of your systems than you do of their systems. They can only demand an audit if you've already agreed to do so in a licensing agreement you consented to. Generally, if you get a corporate site license or possibly other volume licensing from MS, you have agreed to on demand audits. If all the MS software you have came with the machines (like Windows and often Office) or you bought shrinkwrap versions, you don't have to agree to anything unless they have a court order.

      -ec

    4. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by HangingChad · · Score: 1

      They have a rewards program that will pay you money for turning in your company.

      If he does, upper management will blame and fire him. If he's gone, they'll still blame him.

      So, if it's legal in your state, tape the discussion of you informing them of their illegal behavior. Then, when they get busted and try to blame you, sue them for slander, liable and wrongful termination. Now that's potentially some real money there. Let them lie all the way through the depositions, then spring the tapes on them right before trial. That should add some 000's to the settlement.

      Even if you don't go the Perry Mason route, you'll definitely want to put something in writing and keep copies. When they get busted, they'll trying hanging this on all their former IT guys.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    5. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not tip them off about competitors then?

      They investigate... the competitor gets found with contraband software, you get a cut.

      They investigate... they don't find anything.. "Oh, sorry, apparently what I overhead JohnDoeUnverifiableConversationalist saying was wrong."

    6. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      well, unless they're a small company and get bankrupted by the audit shitstorm. Then you're screwed.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by smartr · · Score: 1

      It's not legal to record conversations even when you're a part of them in some jurisdictions (it varies among the states).

    8. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't work quite like this. Microsoft has no more right to demand an audit of your systems than you do of their systems.

      You must be new here.

    9. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      that's why he said if

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mod parent up. Early in my IT career, I worked at a small web dev shop with 15-20 people. Someone got laid off, and called the BSA on us, even though we were licensed on all our software. Someone from the Chicago BSA office showed up and said they had a right to audit us and would be coming in to do so. My manager at the time told them to GTFO and come back with law enforcement if they wanted to do an audit. We never heard from them again.

    11. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      What will happen to the company is: Microsoft will send a letter to the CEO informing him that they will be performing an audit, that they are entitled to do as he is running some form of Microsoft software

      No, that is not how it works. The audit trigger is only for those who have agreements with MS beyond retail or OEM licenses. You will get a letter requesting the audit and true-up in lieu of federal marshalls showing up in the lobby.

      You can also receive a letter stating much the same thing from the BSA as they are an umbrella group representing a bunch of rights holders. The BSA likes to forego the nice letter and go straight to federal marshalls every once in a while to make a public point.

    12. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on what you are saying: If all your software is pirated you don't have to agree to an audit. Ironic, but probably true.

    13. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      I can;t answer for the BSA, but MS did just this at our company - its an America-based multinational, so maybe MS has more say with us than they do with a, say, UK company.

    14. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, as GPP mentioned, if you have a volume licensing agreement, you've already agreed to let them audit whenever they please.

    15. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Stop whining, get off your soap box dude, and be glad you have a job. If you are looking for a job where everything is 100% compliant, quit and find it. Let someone else support his or her family with your job.
      If you do not want to do what you are being asked to do, then by all means, quit. You are lucky you still have a job. It is people like you that make the work place a miserable experience. Always nitpicking and complaining. Just get out and find a job that better suits your morals.
      I would not work there either by the way. I just think your approach is senseless.

    16. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't work quite like this. Microsoft has no more right to demand an audit of your systems than you do of their systems. They can only demand an audit if you've already agreed to do so in a licensing agreement you consented to.

      ...and even that is dubiuous, IMO, a good contract lawyer could probably get that section nullified - buying one piece of software should not (and probably doesn't) give a company the right ot search an entire computer wlilly-nilly.

    17. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to wonder who in their right mind would allow BSA into their company to do an audit, just tell them to pound sand and get off your property. Then I read an article about Ernie Ball and their experience with the BSA. How it works is that on the basis of your whistle blower they darken your doorway with Marshals and a warrant to do an audit, you have no choice in the matter.

    18. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not suggest an alternative to them? If MS-Office licensing is in question and they won't correct it, why not replace it with OpenOffice? They get what they need to do their job and you get to correct the licensing abuse. Ditto for the WinZip example, replace it with 7-zip and move onto more pressing IT matters.

    19. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A court order they will easily get with a whistleblower. You make it sound like they just want to arbitrarily search peoples systems.

    20. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You obviously have no idea what you are talking about.

      The BSA currently holds powers of attorney for MS, Adobe, Symantec, etc. You will never get a letter from Mircrosoft. The BSA will send you a letter saying that you need to do an audit and report it back to them. They will threaten to sue you should you not comply. They will also advise you that you can't simply purchase licenses to cover as you suggest and that any attempt to remove offending software will also result in you being sued. The BSA will allow you to do your own audits, so long as you use BSA approved auditing software. They are even kind enough to provide you with links to free versions.

      So you cannot make any changes to your system, such as reimaging a drive, as they will consider that "Destruction of Evidence". IANAL so I don't know if that is actually true, but I do know the BSA explicitly states that. Once the audit is done the BSA will submit a bill for damages, not licenses. You need to come compliant on your own and will have to submit that plan to the BSA. As part of your settlement agreement you also have to agree to regular audits and give the BSA the right to surprise inspections whenever they want for the next 2 - 5 years.

      End result.. the company gets dicked out of enormous fines and still has to come compliant. I have yet to hear of the BSA settling for less than 100k, and they seem to always find something in their audits. They also get to choose and pick which licenses they think are valid. For example the BSA refuses to accept any licenses purchased via Ebay reguardless of whether they are legit or not. You can certaintly fight this in court if you choose to. The BSA will be more than happy to point out to you that they can keep you tied up in court for some time and that your lawyer fees will soon add up to more than just taking it in the ass and settling with them.

      Yes I have gone through it, and while the company I was working for at the time was in the wrong, the penalties imposed by the BSA were excessive, and their attitude arrogant, condescending and abusive. They are the perfect vehicle for exacting revenge on any company requardless of guilt.

    21. Re:Contact the BSA & request an audit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't have to agree to anything unless they have a court order. ...And that is exactly what happens. They contact the local DA and file. A marshall will accompany the auditor to the site, and they will run the audit (noone from the company is allowed in the 'area' until it is complete). He comes armed by the way (shotgun and all)! The company setup a weekend schedule, where the IT director and owner waited outside the building while the audit was conducted.

      Several days afterwards, a summary notice of 'violations' was presented. Soon after a sales rep showed up and we became 'compliant' in a couple weeks... who knows if anything was really installed or changed... probabaly nothing... the company bought slips of paper in a file cabinet that says they're allowed to use the software.

      MS has no intention of turning this person into a convict... they want to turn them into paying customers. Anything but the most abusive cases of fraud (like distribution) will likely end up in a conversation that says, "we'll drop the filing if you agree to have a friendly visit from a sales rep and work out the details of getting you compliant" (they love that fucking word). They're not stupid, and they are very aware of the fact almost everyone that uses a computer at work are very aware about what software licensing means. Claiming ignorance here (even for non-IT personel) is unacceptable.

      The answer is obvious was business owners do...

  5. Dob them in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dob them in for $5,000 a shot.

    It's anonymous.

    Meanwhile, look for another job.

    But you've pointed it out, you've tried to do the right thing and the only thing left to fix the company system is to find and install legit free software.

    If they refuse even that, look for a job and cash in what you know.

  6. Report them to the Software Business Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Then when they fire you, sue as a whistle-blower, take all their money, and shut the crooks down.

  7. Your answer is at http://www.monster.com by Art+Popp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can see two honorable paths here:

            You can find them FOSS substitutes for their existing software.

            You can find another job.

    If you want to be optimistic you can stand your ground with the managers and state: "I will not install software unless I'm certain we have a proper license for it." And see if they show you the door, or attempt to find some kind of compromise. People that take the time to look seriously at Open Office often like what they find. So there is a slim hope, but odds are, these are not the class of people you want to make a career with, and you'll be happier working somewhere that ethical compromises are not a daily expectation.

    1. Re:Your answer is at http://www.monster.com by Turzyx · · Score: 1

      You can find them FOSS substitutes for their existing software

      There is more than one reason why this is an excellent suggestion. Other than the cost issue, often employers will incorporate training time into the software decision making process. TFS says that they are willing to hang about waiting for shareware timers to count down to avoid paying - surely that time could be spent learning how to use tar or gzip?

    2. Re:Your answer is at http://www.monster.com by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      People that take the time to look seriously at Open Office often like what they find.

      At my job we switched to openoffice due to the licensing cost of office.

      I was very positive about this at first, because I used openoffice writer at home for when I needed to type up a letter, and that had been a positive experience.

      Using it all day for serious word processing quickly changed my mind. Word had one issue that annoyed me: bullet layout going on the fritz if you tried to get fancy with nesting and copy/paste. OO writer by contrast has dozens of issues that annoy me, some minor, some major. The supposed office compatibility is so poor that using it to exchange documents with office users is basically impossible (at least for anything that uses tables and headers/footers). It also has many bugs, some of which shockingly critical, like occasional irreversible corruption of a document when trying to save it with CTRL+S while auto-save is running.

      I've done a complete 180 on openoffice. I don't think it's good enough to use, even if it's free. If I was the decision maker, I would chose to pay for microsoft office instead of using openoffice, because the time lost with openoffice's annoyances vastly outweighs the license cost of office.

    3. Re:Your answer is at http://www.monster.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the money you saved to fund the fixing of those bugs.

    4. Re:Your answer is at http://www.monster.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is along the lines of what I was thinking also -

      Step 1. Perform a license audit across the company.
      Step 2. Provide the CEO with a list of what is required to bring the company up to compliance ( Don't blame him, make sure he knows that your predecessor was at fault since they "lost" the licenses that they paid for "at some time" it's not the CEOs fault that they are not in compliance, wink wink... )
      Step 3. Have an "Open Source" solution ready to go... Linux on desktops without Windows stickers. Open Office, etc.
      Step 4. If he doesn't do either, then don't say anything. Don't threaten anything. Just quietly call the BSA and report them. When they raid, make sure you have the emails from Step 1 and Step 2 and Step 3. At that point you've done everything you can and it can't be blamed on the former IT guy or you either.

    5. Re:Your answer is at http://www.monster.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell would they need to learn how to use tar or gzip? He could deploy 7-zip and they could continue using a simple GUI based app with a single stage archive format(zip's fine for the most part).
      Even if they switched wholesale to linux then they still wouldn't need to use tar or gzip as GNOME at least has integrated archive handling.

    6. Re:Your answer is at http://www.monster.com by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You can find them FOSS substitutes for their existing software.

      That's not going to help, they already have their "free" software. All you can do is make sure that the new stuff coming in on your watch has valid licences.
      Don't worry about it too much. This sort of crap appears to be a normal situation in a lot of MS Windows shops and you are not going to be able to change the culture only the licences one at a time. I've never met an MS Windows fanboy that ever paid for the thing.
      When I faced the same situation (100+ MS Windows machines without a single valid licence for Win2k or MS Office) the only thing to do was report it to management and take up the next contract.
      I don't have many MS Windows machines now so the OEM licence approach works (especially since users often say "I need to run program X, my computer won't be good enough to run it"). Sometimes things happen like a department suddenly gets MS Office 2007 from nowhere, but luckily the guy that decided to go around IT to get it actually got a licence for each. Far more than I expected from a dotnet developer so clueless that everyone has to run his crappy single user at a time database program as Admin so it can write a lock file to the root of their system drive and other stupidity.
      Registration and updates are actually starting to chip away at the MS Windows fanboy culture and it's now more convenient for them to get the company to pay for things than to install a dodgy copy.

  8. It's funny, isn't it... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For most purposes, reasonably people look at the available data first and then infer a conclusion. When it comes to "moral" matters, though, you get a certain subset of people who work in the opposite direction.

    Instead of saying "Well, I do seem to be surrounded by CD-R copies of commercial software activated with leaked VLKs, I must be a dirty pirate." they say "I'm obviously a good person, and good people don't do bad things, therefore the things that I have done could not possibly be bad."

    This would be merely harmless idiocy, were it not for the fact that most of those people are completely wrong.

    1. Re:It's funny, isn't it... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > When it comes to "moral" matters, though, you get a certain subset of people
      > who work in the opposite direction.

      A subset which includes everyone except you and I.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:It's funny, isn't it... by archont · · Score: 1

      Oh I know it's perfectly wrong, but I don't really care anymore. My monthly income is 490. U.S. dollars. The adobe web premium software package that allows me to earn that is 1700 USD. Although admittably I signed up for a free flex, a kind gesture on adobe's part. While I would gladly pay for that software, liver and onions aren't going to walk on my table by itself, y'know. Oh yeah, and I'm not really a US developer. I just put that to dollars so that you don't have to. Frankly you can sue me. It's not like you're going to get much more than dirty clothes and a PC that looks like a prop for the upcoming mad max.

    3. Re:It's funny, isn't it... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      And I'm not sure about you, and you aren't sure about I...

  9. recommend free alternatives by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Informative

    Security essentials is free for business, so replace AVG with that:

    http://www.microsoft.com/Security_Essentials/

    7Zip is free and OSS. Replace Winzip with that. Heck, XP has its own zip handler installed. A lot of techies assumed that XP needs a zip program because 2000 didnt have one. Get rid of it.

    http://www.7-zip.org/

    PDFCreator is free and OSS. It can make PDFs. Most people just need to make them, not 'edit' them.

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/

    1. Re:recommend free alternatives by rcb1974 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. 7-zip is a lot better than WinZIP and 7-zip is free software.

    2. Re:recommend free alternatives by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Ghostview is also a nice free (as in beer) and OSS package for creating PDFs.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      peazip is another good zip alternative

    4. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PDFCreator is free and OSS. It can make PDFs. Most people just need to make them, not 'edit' them.

      If you do need to annotate them then Xournal works fairly well. I often use it to fill out PDF rebate forms and such before printing them.

      True PDF editing software is hard to come by. Inkscape can sometimes make a PDF editable but it's hit-or-miss depending on the content.

    5. Re:recommend free alternatives by wmpp · · Score: 1

      Security essentials is free for business, so replace AVG with that:

      http://www.microsoft.com/Security_Essentials/

      FYI, Security Essentials is only free for home-based businesses.

    6. Re:recommend free alternatives by Dunx · · Score: 1

      There are problems with the XP zip handler - not on expand, but on create: it doesn't put files prefixed with a '.' into the archive. This is utterly disastrous if you are trying to archive an Eclipse workspace, for example. So a third party tool is essential for anything dev-related, I would argue.

      7-Zip is a good tool, as you say. I also quite like zip/unzip on the Cygwin command line.

      --
      Dunx
      Converting caffeine into code since 1982
    7. Re:recommend free alternatives by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Cute pdf, or even a Samba server with a fake "printer" shared that creates PDFs and emails 'em back to the user...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    8. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Security Essentials EULA:

      1 INSTALLATION AND USE RIGHTS.

              * Use. You may install and use any number of copies of the software on your devices in your household for use by people who reside there or for use in your home-based small business.

      http://www.microsoft.com/security_Essentials/eula.aspx

    9. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is pretty much the best way to go. But don't bring it up as a compliance issue. "We didn't buy these things so we need to switch to free stuff!" will never sell.

      Instead, convince them about productivity and security of free software. Tell how many fewer hours you'll spend curing infected workstations when they can't be infected (for all intents and purposes) by switching to ubuntu for front-line people. (ie, people who might have expensive apps installed but never need their functionality, or a license for the software)

      You kill two birds with one stone that way. You make the environment more secure and more uniform, as well as ensuring license compliance.

      It's really more about how you sell the alternatives, rather than selling the need to be compliant. Convince him he'll save or make money with these changes, and you're more likely to get your RFP approved.

      Or wait till the backup jobs fail in a most epic way, and when the server goes down explain that symantec/hp/dell/mcaffee just won't support an expired license, or a pirated serial, and that you can't do anything, because he didn't give you the tools you needed to keep the environment functioning.

    10. Re:recommend free alternatives by Celeste+R · · Score: 1

      As an alternative to Office, use OpenOffice.

      However, it _must_ be pointed out: you'd be making a lot of changes. Some people (especially management) see that as rocking the boat when it's 'going along just fine'.

      The best thing to do (from my point of view): Educate your boss, keep a diary of what you're trying to do to be ethical, and do your best to get out of a sticky situation before it gets worse.

      Once you're out, of course, you can drop the bomb.

      --
      There are no perfect answers, only the right questions. More questions at http://foresightandhindsight.blogspot.com/
    11. Re:recommend free alternatives by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I agree that 7-zip is a good archiver, and can also un-archive RAR files. For some reason I find trial versions of Winrar rampant on business computers. Failing special requirements, most users have no need to create RAR files.

      For PDF, print-to-pdf programs are a dime a dozen. I also like PDF-Xchange viewer as a viewer. It gives free annoitation tools: http://www.docu-track.com/home/prod_user/PDF-XChange_Tools/pdfx_viewer/ I also like PDFTK/PDFTKBuilder to help combine, rearrange PDFs: http://www.angusj.com/pdftkb/#pdftkbuilder

      On MSE, from their EULA: http://www.microsoft.com/Security_Essentials/eula.aspx#mainNav

      # INSTALLATION AND USE RIGHTS.

      * Use. You may install and use any number of copies of the software on your devices in your household for use by people who reside there or for use in your home-based small business.

    12. Re:recommend free alternatives by Medieval · · Score: 1

      The built in zip handler in XP is crap.

    13. Re:recommend free alternatives by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 4, Informative

      Eh, 7-Zip is a better compression algorithm than it is software. The GUI is not as nice as that in WinZIP or WinRAR (it's designed around Norton Commander instead of the more well-understood Windows Explorer model), the installer doesn't provide the option to associate the files, the association mechanism within the program itself wants admin rights but doesn't properly ask for them so it conflicts with Vista and 7's UAC, the archiver lacks "preserve full pathname" support (extraction support works fine), the context menu component defaults to off, etc. The command line version makes me miss tar, as it lacks the seemingly-basic feature of deleting files after archiving which would make archiving logs so easy.

      It's a good program that's fine for personal and home use, but it requires a lot of post-install configuration that is difficult to deploy for a business to get the kind of uniform desktops that make IT life easier. About the only good thing business-wise is that the installer is an .msi file.

      I use 7-Zip because it's free as in beer. If I had my choice, though, I'd use WinRAR.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    14. Re:recommend free alternatives by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Missing in the list:
          Ubuntu is free and OSS, so replace Windows with it. No need for antivirus, includes openoffice (that can handle pdf creation if you need), with nautilus open zip files and around 10-20k more useful programs that can replace most of the apps their use.

    15. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Windows 2000 you could install .ZIP file capabilities as an operating system component.

    16. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of PDFCreator, install CC PDF Converter ( http://www.cogniview.com/cc-pdf-converter.php ), and get people used to creating PDFs with an embedded creative-commons license of their choice.

    17. Re:recommend free alternatives by Bourdain · · Score: 1

      Re: a winzip / xp zip handler alternative -- I recommend izarc --> http://www.izarc.org/

      It has a less convoluted interface than 7Zip though it is not OSS, I believe it is free for commercial use

    18. Re:recommend free alternatives by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

      We all have our opinions I guess. Zipping and unzipping files is a simple issue. 7zip does the job and stays out of the way. I prefer it.

    19. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is MS Security Essentials free for business use? I wasn't sure, but the license states:

      "You may install and use any number of copies of the software on your devices in your household for use by people who reside there or for use in your home-based small business."

    20. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft Security Essentials license state that the product is for home use only. Microsoft's website points you to Forefront security for Business users.

    21. Re:recommend free alternatives by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      The GUI is not as nice as that in WinZIP or WinRAR ..., the installer doesn't provide the option to associate the files

      Disclaimer: I'm an old fart. That said: These are (or should be) everyday file archive utilities. People are concerned about nice GUIs and "installers", which serve mainly to make them seem more weighty and valuable than they are. What, we need to be entertained now while we do something as quick and simple as building and extracting archives? Kids these days...

    22. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best thing is, 7-zip is not part of the BSA. Because winzip is part of the BSA, they can confiscate almost any of your computers, and spend a few years to work out how large the fine will be, before returning your hardware.

    23. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that you can't use Security Essentials unless it's for home or for use in a home-based small business:

      http://www.microsoft.com/Security_Essentials/eula.aspx#mainNav [microsoft.com]

    24. Re:recommend free alternatives by Petaris · · Score: 1

      Instead of pdfcreator I prefer CutePDF Writer ( http://www.cutepdf.com/products/cutepdf/Writer.asp ) as it doesn't have as many confusing ( to non-computer literate people ) options and just works. :)

      --
      ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"
    25. Re:recommend free alternatives by JobyOne · · Score: 1

      I don't know what version of 7-Zip you're using. I've experienced few to none of those problems.

      While I will admit that not being able to do file associations at install is annoying, I've managed to use the association mechanism in the program without a hitch on Vista AND 7. No I'm not doing day-to-day as admin, and yes I have UAC turned on. I've also found the shell integration to be turned on by default.

      As for preserving full pathnames, I never noticed it was lacking because I never use it. I also don't do a lot of command line compressing, but if you want to delete files after archiving make a shell script or batch file, it would be about two lines long.

      Seriously, you'd use WinRAR?

      --
      Porquoi?
    26. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security essentials is not "free for business" it's "free for home-based business":

      Use. You may install and use any number of copies of the software on your devices in your household for use by people who reside there or for use in your home-based small business.

      Read the license.

    27. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I converted a company I worked for over from MS Office to OpenOffice... they were reluctant to switch until I demoed creating a copy protected PDF from Writer... complete with in-document hyperlinks. The desktop conversion went very quickly after that, with a single-seat license of MS Office staying around for those moments when nothing else will work.

      Conclusion: Getting management to switch from pirated software to a free equivalent is an uphill battle (They're both "free"), but upgrading to a free alternative with more features they actually want can be very easy. They see value in using OpenOffice instead of both MS Office and Adobe Acrobat.

    28. Re:recommend free alternatives by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      No no.. What we need is the experience when we are using our software.

    29. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MICROSOFT SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS
      MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS 1.0 ...

      1.INSTALLATION AND USE RIGHTS.
      Use. You may install and use any number of copies of the software on your devices in your household for use by people who reside there or for use in your home-based small business.

      So i Would assume that since he mentioned about 20 pcs, it wouldnt be considered SOHO.

    30. Re:recommend free alternatives by ET3D · · Score: 1

      I use IZArc. Unlike 7-Zip, I find it easy to use, and it's free for home and commercial use.

    31. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security essentials is free for business, so replace AVG with that:

      http://www.microsoft.com/Security_Essentials/

      7Zip is free and OSS. Replace Winzip with that. Heck, XP has its own zip handler installed. A lot of techies assumed that XP needs a zip program because 2000 didnt have one. Get rid of it.

      http://www.7-zip.org/

      PDFCreator is free and OSS. It can make PDFs. Most people just need to make them, not 'edit' them.

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/

      Security Essentials for business use is against the EULA. Try Clamwin instead, its open source.

    32. Re:recommend free alternatives by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      The GUI not being as user-friendly (meaning it doesn't obey the same conventions that the Windows Explorer model does) is a problem for average users, not power users. I still get occasional complaints from less technical users because 7-Zip is Norton Commander-like in many respects.

      The installer not having options is a problem for corporate or enterprise deployment. What good is the tool if it isn't turned on and there's no easy way to configure it centrally? With most software I'd expect (that is, like) to be able to use an .mst to configure the installer to do typical tasks such as file associations and configuration so that it's easy to deploy.

      As I said, I use 7-Zip for personal use. Average Windows users seem to have a lot better experience with WinZip's and WinRAR's conventions.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    33. Re:recommend free alternatives by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      The problem with associations may be limited to the 64-bit version, but it's a problem you can see with a Google search that I've seen on both Vista x64 and Windows 7 x64 with UAC enabled. It makes me worry that non-admins will not be able to easily specify file associations. I'm also positive I had to turn the shell integration on when I installed 7 x64 last, but that may just have been a random bug or me misremembering as Google doesn't show any similar hits.

      I use preserve full pathnames when copying folders from one system to another. I don't need to worry about specifying a path at all (other than root) if I preserve full pathnames. Less possibility of me making a typing error or unzipping incorrectly. WinZIP has it. WinRAR has it. GNU tar has it. 7-Zip does not.

      As far as deleting after archiving, I do use a script to do this, too. Of course, you have to remember with a script that you need to first move the files to a new directory, then archive, then delete. Otherwise you risk deleting a file that wasn't archived because it was locked when 7z ran but not when delete did. Again, WinZIP has it. WinRAR has it. GNU tar has it. 7-Zip does not.

      And yes, in a corporate setting, I'd absolutely prefer to use WinRAR.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    34. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security essentials is free for business, so replace AVG with that:

      http://www.microsoft.com/Security_Essentials/

      From the Security Essentials Terms of Use:

      1. INSTALLATION AND USE RIGHTS.
      a. Use. You may install and use any number of copies of the software on your devices in your household for use by people who reside there or for use in your home-based small business.

      Any use even in a real small business breaks this use agreement.

    35. Re:recommend free alternatives by jonwil · · Score: 1

      What I like about 7-zip is that (based on various tests vs WinRar) it produces smaller zip files for the same data.

    36. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure about the file association, but some how 7zip use a global association when you change it, it apply to everyone.

      It never automatically change the file association which is a good thing to me, I prefer to manually set the association. Most of the time I just leave out the ZIP, CAB to Windows built in. (This is to encourage user to use default option instead of relying on 3rd party program, lets not forget setting it back to built in Windows zip association can be complicated.)

      For the full pathname, hardly use it too. I can bet with you this is most likely for advance user, normal end user can't even differentiate a zip file from a compressed folder or the shell integration. IMHO preserve full pathname can be annoying at time, imagine if I receive a file and it just magically create a new folder in the root or %WINDIR%. However I can understand if an administrator need to perform some quick and dirty program file patching with it, I think you can do it by manually creating the folder structure and use 7zip to compress the folder as a whole.

      Most of the time, I use 7zip as a backup, a multi format file opener. The simplicity is a plus point to me.

    37. Re:recommend free alternatives by mattb47 · · Score: 1

      The list of antiviruses that are totally free for business is pretty slim. Most free antivirus programs are only free for personal usage.

      Security Essentials isn't free for business, just home businesses. Sorry. I wish it was totally free. But most free AV isn't supposed to be used by home businesses either, so Microsoft is actually a bit more open than most AV companies. (Imagine that...) Security Essentials' license information here:
      http://www.microsoft.com/security_Essentials/eula.aspx#mainNav

      "You may install and use any number of copies of the software [MS Security Essentials] on your devices in your household for use by people who reside there or for use in your home-based small business."

      ClamWin (which can't do realtime scans), Comodo, and PC Tools are all OK for any use (commercial or personal). Comodo is probably the best of the bunch, but it's very, very complex. It comes with Comodo's firewall -- which is very powerful but arcane. PC Tools' antivirus doesn't automatically update.

      http://www.clamwin.com/
      http://antivirus.comodo.com/
      http://www.pctools.com/free-antivirus/

      Spyware Terminator is completely free for any use and can use the ClamWin engine as a realtime antivirus. But I haven't tried it yet. This may be the best current option.
      http://www.spywareterminator.com/
      http://www.techmalaya.com/2008/05/10/clamav-real-time-scan/

      Moon Secure AV is a realtime version of ClamAV, but it was pretty flaky the last time I tried it. Maybe it's better now? (Wikipedia notes that Moon is violating the GPL by not publishing its code. So take that into consideration, too.) If Moon worked well, it would probably be a great choice.
      http://www.moonsecure.com/

      On the ZIP front, I like IZArc better than 7zip. It's basically 7zip (it uses 7zip's code) with an interface more similar to WinZip. I think this makes it a better WinZip replacement.
      http://www.izarc.org/

      - Matthew Borcherding

    38. Re:recommend free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The command line version makes me miss tar, as it lacks the seemingly-basic feature of deleting files after archiving which would make archiving logs so easy.

      You know, tar can pipe through LZMA (7-Zip's compressor) with a simple command-line switch (--lzma - sorry, no short option). I never use anything BUT tar to create archives. :)

    39. Re:recommend free alternatives by zoloto · · Score: 1

      To specifically address the point of deploying software (and configurations) across a network try www.wpkg.org. It provides a simple way to push, upgrade and remove software with the platform. I've used it along side WSUS and was very pleased with the results. It was much simpler than wsus, IMHO.

  10. Well... by scubamage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For utilities like winzip, replace them with open source stuff like 7zip. Explain that it's ok to be used for commercial use, and it avoids annoying licensing costs. As for the other stuff, shoot an email to your management about it and print it out. If they refuse to listen, at least you have a hard copy on record showing that you tried to warn them. Then, if anything ever happens legally you've tried to notify them and you can't get canned. If they do, they'll have a hefty wrongful termination lawsuit on their hands. If it really bothers you, find a new job and call the BSA. Tattletale. :-P

    1. Re:Well... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      If they do, they'll have a hefty wrongful termination lawsuit on their hands.

      I'm curious, does that still work in Right-to-work states?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:Well... by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Technically it should; terminating someone because they were doing their job (ensuring that licensing is up to date is a job of an IT guy) usually doesn't fly. However, they'll never say that was the actual reason why he was fired, and unless they actually come out and say it, its incredibly hard to prove.

    3. Re:Well... by sthomas · · Score: 1

      Even if they come up with another reason, it would look like retaliation and they would likely lose in a court case (depending on the state). Some states favor the business, some favor the individual. Also, if you're already on a performance plan or under other disciplinary action for some other causes, retaliation is harder to prove.

      But if you're a "good employee" and you're holding evidence that you tried to warn them about licensing issues and they terminate you when auditors show up for licensing confirmation, retaliation is likely enough that a good employment attorney will win the case, and even more likely get the business to settle before it even goes to a case, even in a "at-will employment" state.

    4. Re:Well... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      In a right to work state however the "actual reason" doesn't matter. Part of being a right to work state is essentially that an employer has the right to terminate you for any reason they want, or no reason at all (you similarly also have the right to terminate your own employment under the same options). The only thing they can't do is fire you for discriminatory reasons - ie based on race, religion, age, gender, etc, but that falls under a different set of laws and wouldn't be considered a wrongful termination suit.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:Well... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's a civil case, so you don't have to prove it, just show a preponderance of evidence. If you come to the big boss with piracy concerns, document the level of piracy and refuse to add to it, that's a big finger pointing at the boss canning you for doing your job.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:Well... by sthomas · · Score: 1

      Actual reasons absolutely do matter. Beyond discrimination, there are other limitations as well, which is why I said it depends on the jurisdictions. Look up "At-will employment" on Wikipedia for an overview, then check your local state's laws. 43 states plus D.C. have exceptions based on public policy, for instance. "At-will" gives flexibility, not total immunity.

      Making a reasonable case that a termination had the appearance of retaliation, even if it did not, will usually send the business to the settlement table. Employment rights offices will often require that both sides attempt to address the complaint outside of court. And in this age of "evil company must be punished," no company wants the public to hear that they retaliated against a whistleblower who was trying to bring to light that the company was breaking laws. If the company is public or regulated, it's a nightmare of future auditing, possible sanctions, and opening the door to class-action lawsuits. And any company doesn't want that kind of bad PR.

    7. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send the email, but don't expect a response, in writing anyway.

  11. get another job by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they're dishonest in one area, well, they're dishonest, period. You'll get dicked over if you stay there. Frankly, I have no qualms about calling the BSA about places like this....

    1. Re:get another job by Enderandrew · · Score: 0

      Mod parent insightful.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:get another job by cromar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's people like you that brighten up the world. Obviously they pirate software, so they must be Satanist baby murderers. String 'em up! Ratting out a small business to the BSA is an incredibly cowardly act.

    3. Re:get another job by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So is not paying for software.

      If you are willing to steal from other companies, pirate software, etc., and openly lie about it, then chances are you don't particularly care about your customer, either. You care literally only about money, apparently.

    4. Re:get another job by cromar · · Score: 1
      Not paying for software is cowardly how?

      If you are willing to steal from other companies, pirate software, etc., and openly lie about it, then chances are you don't particularly care about your customer, either. You care literally only about money, apparently.

      OR MAYBE YOU DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY EXORBITANT PRICES FOR COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE!! But who cares, software pirates are all baby murderers, anyway, right?

    5. Re:get another job by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      It's one thing if you're a startup and have 20 people and no cash flow and can barely make salary to make 20 copies of WinZip with the hopes of true-ing up someday. It's another to completely deny the problem.

      I've been in both situations (one a mega-corp with ostrich syndrome).

    6. Re:get another job by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      I didn't say they were baby murderers. I said they apparently don't care much about their customer. In my experience, if someone doesn't care about treating another business ethically and running their business ethically, they don't care too much about treating their customers ethically, either.

      If you don't have the money to pay for commercial software, look into alternatives. Isn't that what most people do for most things that aren't easily gotten without paying for them?

      "Hmmm, this house is too much. Guess I won't buy any house."

      "Hmmm, I can't afford this car. Guess I won't by any car."

      ... most people look for cheaper alternatives that are legal because most people don't want to steal a house (heh) or a car. When it comes to pirating software, I wonder how many of those mentioned in this particular situation actually looked to see if there was a free alternative or if they immediately thought "well, we may not be able to afford this, so let's just rip it for free."

      And if their first inclination/thought was to take the "easy" way and simply not pay for it while still using it - illegally - then I can't imagine their other business practice/ethics are very good, either. "Well, we can't afford to give all of these customers the same support. Oh well. Let's keep charging them for it and just let them have busy signals. We'll make up for it later."

    7. Re:get another job by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      If you don't have the money to pay for the cost of doing business, you shouldn't be running a business or in charge of financials.

      That's all we're saying. Software is part of the cost of business. If you want to use Microsoft Excel, you pay for it. If you want to use Adobe Acrobat, you pay for it. Microsoft paid their employees to make the software, they paid a firm to package the software (heck, maybe they're big enough that they do it all in-house.) Either way, they paid for every step of the way to make the software useful and available. Heck, the same thing applies to open source in different ways. If you violate the GPL, it's still time and effort that some developer put into it in order to make the code freely available. If you don't like their rules, don't use their source code. If you don't like Microsoft's rules, don't buy their products.

      It's that easy.

    8. Re:get another job by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      If someone trying to start a home web design business pirates a copy of Adobe CS4 I don't really have a problem with it. (Hell, my first copy of Dreamweaver was pirated, back in college.) That's sorta the moral equivalent of homeless people jumping the subway turnstile. When people honestly cannot afford to follow the rules, as long as they aren't hurting others, we'll look the other way.

      But the problem is that lot of companies don't give it the slightest thought, even long past that point, with a dozen employees and computers, with payroll in the hundreds of thousands and they're all running off some cracked copy of XP and pirated office because they're too damn cheap or lazy to pay a few thousand for software.

      By the time a company has enough to rent an office, or hire a computer guy, they really have enough money to pay for their software.

      And if those people actually paid for their software, software prices would be lower anyway.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    9. Re:get another job by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      When people honestly cannot afford to follow the rules, as long as they aren't hurting others, we'll look the other way.

      But that depends on why they can't afford it. I spent all my money gambling; I can't afford to pay for [insert something here]. I don't want to work. I'll use it for free.

      But I agree with the rest, hehe.

    10. Re:get another job by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      My business can't afford to buy an office tower downtown, so, we don't do it. See how that works?

    11. Re:get another job by MaximumFrost · · Score: 1

      If you don't have the money for rather cheap software licences, then you probably need to find a better job. Software is insanely cheap compared to other costs. Even if you're running dedicated systems that are custom fit to your enterprise, the cost of licensing is a drop in the bucket compared to say...an employee.

      Not paying for software is not a right. It is cowardly, because you're refusing to reimburse a coder for their hard work, so they can continue to develop and produce software. I can understand trying something out, but to use something for profit and not pay for it is not only illegal, it's unethical.

  12. Document Everything by kid_oliva · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Document everything and then turn them in. Of course the previous look for another job applies as well.

    --
    I eat Karma for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. That's why I don't have any.
  13. Report them by gregthebunny · · Score: 1

    Anonymously to the BSA. And start looking for a new job.

    1. Re:Report them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't report them anonymously or you won't get paid

  14. Change in some Policies by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1, Informative

    First off, you shouldn't need to use Winzip, every computer since like Windows 95 has had its own method of compression to send files. Toss that out, and just use the right click "Send to compressed (zip) folder".

    Secondly, If your boss is saying that you had to have paid for software at one point, tell him that you're going to have to buy licenses for each time that software is used.

    This means that either
    A) Your IT Budget is going way up
    or
    B) Other Departments are going to have to expense their own software, and you just aid in the installation and support.

    If your IT Manager is content with what software you've got going on, either knowing full well that its trial version or doesn't care, than its really not your place to challenge that, and you go with it.

    If YOU are the IT Manager, you need to get some backbone and tell the Chief that you are at serious risk of lawsuit.

    1. Re:Change in some Policies by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Other Departments are going to have to expense their own software, and you just aid in the installation and support.

      In which case your budget is still going to go way up because instead of a volume license for Office (can be installed on a number of machines, installation can be scripted, a master copy can be stored on a server somewhere, can use the same key on all the machines) you'll get a couple of dozen boxed copies (to which none of the above applies).

    2. Re:Change in some Policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, you shouldn't need to use Winzip, every computer since like Windows 95 has had its own method of compression to send files.

      Wrong. And I quit reading this after the "like".

    3. Re:Change in some Policies by CannonballHead · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Using "like" like that is a travesty of English grammar. Incidentally, periods go inside of quotes. ;)

    4. Re:Change in some Policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, you shouldn't need to use Winzip, every computer since like Windows 95 has had its own method of compression to send files. Toss that out, and just use the right click "Send to compressed (zip) folder".

      Every Windows OS since WinXP (and it might of even been one of the Service Packs) had minimal zip support.

      Every Linux|Unix in my lifetime has had full TAR, ZIP, GZIP and BZIP functionality at the command prompt. And so does Windows if using Cygwin or GNU UnxUtils.

  15. Different Approach by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Instead of accsing the company of piracy (even if they're guilty), use another approach.

    Say, I'm concerned that renewing future licenses will be very expensive. Say, the 1,000 copies of Winzip at $30 each is $30,000. 7-zip is a free alternative that actually works better, and will save the company $30,000 the new time those licenses need to be renewed. Alnd OpenOffice saves $400 per license over MS Office. OpenOffice comes with free PDF export functionality, which saves the $500 Acrobat license.

    You may get approval to install free, legal alternatives and get rid of the pirated software. Even better, instead of being seen as the problem (the person who has a moral objection to their piracy), you'll be seen as a solution.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Different Approach by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or, if you are in a position of relative authority (and not as afraid of getting canned) you can quote the $250,000 fines the BSA can assess PER VIOLATION and tell them it would greatly behoove themselves to switch to FOSS alternatives and cover their ass.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:Different Approach by daveime · · Score: 1, Troll

      Alnd OpenOffice saves $400 per license over MS Office

      And how much is lost in productivity, retraining staff, converting between formats, and the pointy headed boss calling you every 2 minutes because Clippy doesn't help him compose his letters anymore ?

      Free software is only free if your time is valueless.

    3. Re:Different Approach by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Free software is only free if your time is valueless.

      Sometimes I agree with that. But except for powerpoint vs. impress, openoffice is pretty good and not a difficult switch. In my experience, of course. and if the boss needs ppt, buy one copy of it... most employees won't need it though (except maybe a viewer, which is free).

    4. Re:Different Approach by gunnk · · Score: 1

      The retraining needed for moving to the current version of OpenOffice is no greater than moving to a new version MS Office from an older one except for the transition away from Access.

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    5. Re:Different Approach by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      It's usually more like $10k per violation. Which is a lot more believable. Although there's a lot of scare mongering out there about $90k to $150k per violation fines. Your boss is more likely to believe the former number, but disregard the latter numbers as pure FUD.

      $950,000 BSA Violation Fine (about $8900 per)
      U.S. Companies Fined for Using Illegal Software ($70-$110k total fines)

      So, as in all things legal, YMMV. At least with the above two links, you can offer concrete evidence of the actual fine amounts rather then some hypothetical amounts.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    6. Re:Different Approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Free software is only free if your time is valueless."

      I find that the changes that Microsoft makes between versions (XP -> Win7, new ribbon bars in office) is far more disruptive than the differences between MS Office and OpenOffice. If you've used Office 97-2003, you'll find OpenOffice a lot more intuitive than this dumb "ribbon bar" they force upon you in the new versions of MS Office. OO also does a pretty good job of reading/writing MS formats.

      The only part of OO that is substandard is the spreadsheet (Calc). Graphs are awkward and ugly, compared to Excel. The word processor, vector drawing, and powerpoint-equivalent are quite good.

      Point is that yes, you have to consider the cost of support - but people underestimate the cost of support for commercial software.

    7. Re:Different Approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, it's his *job*, he's getting paid. More time = more money. Even if you're right that free software requires more time (which is not true at all; OpenOffice Write is much easier and quicker to use than Word 2007, for example), why would that be a bad thing?

    8. Re:Different Approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest problem I have found with switching to OpenOffice from MS Office is that many companies bastardize excel spreadsheets with tons of macros. These macros add a ton of value and functionality to the spreadsheet and most users could not part with it.

    9. Re:Different Approach by mikep554 · · Score: 1

      ...you can quote the $250,000 fines the BSA can assess PER VIOLATION...

      The BSA cannot assess anything. They have no legal authority to do so. What they can do is ask you to pay money in a settlement rather than engaging in a very long and expensive legal battle against them. If the case has very clear-cut evidence, paying $250,000 may well be cheaper, quicker and simpler than a court battle, even for a very small company.

    10. Re:Different Approach by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The BSA site and ads claim they can levy $250,000 fines per violation. I wonder now if that is only if you're a BSA member. And if by not paying the fine, you simply lose BSA-membership. Still, I'm sure you can sued by Microsoft or however.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    11. Re:Different Approach by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      How much do you spend training staff to make the switch between Office 2003 and Office 2007, or the upcoming 2010?

      Studies have shown that it is easier to switch from 2003 to OOo than to 2007.

      OOo opens 2003 documents just fine, and handles most 2007 documents without too much trouble. It passes the grandma test, as literally I switched my mother to it, and she thought she was still on MS Office.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    12. Re:Different Approach by Kjella · · Score: 1

      More likely you'll get a "Huh? We never paid that much for software, WTF are you talking about? And there's no way we're paying that, we're sticking with what we have. Renewing? We're not renting any software, so why would we need to renew what works?"

      As long as the boss doesn't see the difference between doing it legally and doing it illegally, you'll always fail against the old IT person who kept the company running on a shoestring budget. It's the old "I don't care how you do it, bu the last guy did and you either manage with what you got or I'll find someone competent that will." tactic.

      The closest thing he could do is probably to get some form of CYA, stating that the IT department has too little information to guarantee that it is license compliant and that proof of existing licenses must be provided otherwise the responsibility must lie with Purchasing/Legal. And keep track of all software he's asked to install, using which keys/licenses.

      In all likelihood he can't stop getting fired if shit hits the fan. What he does need is to come out of it with a normal termination because he's got enough proof that the management knew and/or was responsible for the compliance failure, instead of a termination with cause for installing pirated software. From what I gather in the US is pretty common that the only thing companies will confirm is the start date, end date and position of employment so that would be enough.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:Different Approach by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Go-oo.org is Novell's fork of OpenOffice, which includes improved macro support.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    14. Re:Different Approach by Ramirozz · · Score: 1

      I agree... most managers see this as a money / time / resources issue so by proving that you will save them some bucks they will be more eager to listen. Sad but true.

      --
      http://www.quasarcr.com/
    15. Re:Different Approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The merit in this approach is the tact. I think it's brilliant. No one gets accused, your conscience is eased, and your company stops breaking the law. Good stuff.

    16. Re:Different Approach by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      That's a good approach. Perhaps another prong in the strategy would be to show that it is cheaper to roll out the freeware than to track down all of the licenses (sometimes it's amazing how hard it is to track down licenses we *know* we purchased in my organization). All it takes is one pissed off ex-employee, and you'll have a BSA audit.

      Also, by lowering the cost of paid software on new machines, you'll lower the cost of adding new machines. That allows you to be more flexible and, um, operate at business speed. (you just gotta know management lingo)

    17. Re:Different Approach by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      It is for this reason that the CEO's responsibility to its shareholders right now is to make this guy disappear, by any means necessary that costs less than those fine.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    18. Re:Different Approach by Technician · · Score: 1

      Give them a copy of the Ernie Ball story for starters and let them know they are much more vulnerable.

      http://news.cnet.com/2008-1082_3-5065859.html
      http://www.screaming-penguin.com/node/3251

      "So after this little debacle the President of Ernie Ball said get the Microsoft crap the hell out of here if they are going to treat us in that manner.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    19. Re:Different Approach by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      It passes the grandma test, as literally I switched my mother to it, and she thought she was still on MS Office.

      I told my 64 year old mother that I was upgrading her to the new version of Office. She called me up a few days later to tell me how much she liked it. :)

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    20. Re:Different Approach by dangitman · · Score: 1

      So, you don't have any problem with lying?

      7-zip is a free alternative that actually works better, and will save the company $30,000 the new time those licenses need to be renewed.

      But they never bought licenses in the first place, so how are they saving $30,000?

      OpenOffice comes with free PDF export functionality, which saves the $500 Acrobat license.

      Except that you don't need OpenOffice to get free PDF export functionality. There are plenty of tools that allow PDF export from MS Office for free.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    21. Re:Different Approach by daveime · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm not debating that there is also a cost in upgrading to a more recent version of MS Office. But in a lot of cases, businesses are solid enough with Office 97 or Office XP, and don't feel the need to upgrade.

      The issue here was that because of the cost of licences for MS products, the suggested alternative is "free" OpenOffice, with the implication that the changeover comes at zero cost, which is simply not true.

    22. Re:Different Approach by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice saves $400 per license over MS Office.

      And increases training and support cost because its 'new', and you have no one to call when it breaks.

      Don't get me wrong, i'm all for OSS solutions, but switching is NOT the simple 'its free software' argument. There are hidden costs in any migration and not accounting for them spells failure.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    23. Re:Different Approach by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Except in this case, training users to use OOo is simpler than training them to use newer versions of Microsoft Office.

      So you save on the license, and you save on training.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  16. Love em or hate em... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    If piracy is really that bad -> https://reporting.bsa.org/usa/home.aspx

    It is what they are there for.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  17. Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employment by OmniGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The ethical thing to do at this stage in the game is to drop a dime on'em. The sensible thing to do is to ensure that you still have an income afterwards. Count on the boss finding out and retaliating; whether that is illegal or not, factor that into your plans.

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  18. Could OP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Quit the company. Get an attorney. Claim there is a hostile environment because you know they are breaking laws and you are asked to break the laws too, and then report the company to BSA and sue them? (for the hostile work environment)

  19. 7-zip FTW? by swb311 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, 7-zip is not only free, but in many aspects faster and better than WinZip.

    1. Re:7-zip FTW? by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 1

      7zip is indeed nice, but to automatically create file associations can sometimes be a bitch, depending on how you're installing it. Or associating icons with those file associations. There are scripts out there for it, but it sucks nonetheless.

      I forced my non-profit to order legit versions of Office 2003, Outlook 2007 (for those that COULDN'T use Google Apps), and Adobe Reader from TechSoup a few years back. Its been nice having VLK support for rapid network installation after reformatting a system.

      As far as an antivirus goes, I found that 70% of the junk that ends up on work computers that have restricted installation is from flash drives, so what I did was used Rising Antivirus. Yes I know....its horrible junk. But it does effectively block almost anything that tries to run from a flash drive.

      My advice? Go to them with a risk analysis. "Not paying for a good corporate antivirus makes us X% more vulnerable, and it costs X amount as a one-time payment"...."getting busted for using the same cdkey on every computer will cost us X amount"....and so on. But when you spend money on software, show them something else that the company can save money on. We just saved a SHITLOAD when I determined that switching over to a direct copier contract with Canon would be most cost-efficient. Rent projectors instead of buying them. Find a cheaper, better paper for your copier. Use all free software on lab computers.

  20. Live with it or find another job by asmussen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In office environments like this, management's stand is very unlikely to change. Trying to change their minds will be an exercise in futility, so you need to just focus your decision making on whether or not you are willing to stick around and be a part of it, or would rather look for another job.

    --
    Shawn Asmussen
    1. Re:Live with it or find another job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember if your a part of it they will throw you out as the sacrificial lamb and just claim they didn't know, they are just honest business men misled by that evil IT guy in the basement.

  21. Winzip? Replace it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With 7-zip. Consider making a donation too, of course.

  22. This is a serious problem by mewsenews · · Score: 1

    You have to go legit. There are small things you can do to help bring them in compliance, like install 7-zip rather than WinZip, but it's damning that you've been ignored by management after mentioning the problem.

    I'd feel better reading about your situation if management had said "yeeeah, it's a big problem, we're working towards being legit". Bald faced denial means you have to get the hell out of there.

    You are going to have to find another job. After you're out of there, you can forget all about it or report them to the BSA based on how big a dick you want to be. I'd usually never advise reporting a company to the BSA but if they've basically forced you out of your job I think it would be fair play.

  23. Piracy without guns and ships? by Statecraftsman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I started this post with the idea that I would make a joke similar to what RMS says about piracy requiring guns and ships but when I stopped to think about the words pirate and piracy, it really is odd that they're used when software is executed outside the limits of a license. It's totally reasonable in the face of ridiculous license terms to want to get past all that and just use the software. That's why we've gone from no product keys to product keys to activation and now to automatic auditing like Windows Genuine Advantage. With invasive tools like WGA that can scan your system and send who-knows-what back to the developer even holding your system hostage against bug and security fixes, I'm starting to feel like piracy is closer to what's happening on the developer side of the equation. Just another reason to shift to free(as in freedom) software...

    1. Re:Piracy without guns and ships? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the term piracy has been in common use for this purpose for a couple hundred years now, beginning with books, thus the rest of your comment is irrelevant (not that I disagree with it).

      Whenever I see somebody comment on the use of the term piracy relating to copyrighted works this is what I see: "LOL! This word means two things, I am so clever!"

    2. Re:Piracy without guns and ships? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >it really is odd that they're used when software is executed outside the limits of a license. It's totally reasonable in the face of ridiculous license terms to want to get past all that and just use the software.

      Well, that's the definition of pirate. Operating without a license or outside its limits. If you have a license or a commission then you're not a pirate. Meaning you could only attempt or attack ships and lands as stated in your license. The looting and the plunder stayed the same. Radio stations, same thing; no license>>pirate. Software; no license>>pirate. In the Netherlands if you're caught speeding you're a road pirate. Same principle, It isn't in your license. The cop catching you may have been speeding more but he's ok. He's got the correct license.

    3. Re:Piracy without guns and ships? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS said this about piracy? Yet he doesn't feel weird making comparisions to slavery? And his followers think it is justified to call it "stealing" when someone redistributes open source software without making his modifications available?

      I honestly see more justification in the use of piracy than in the use of stealing.

    4. Re:Piracy without guns and ships? by justfred · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact all these protections makes it more difficult for legitimately licensed users, to use the products. With Dell machines we used to use, it was a lot easier to install pirated copies of Windows than the legit copies (that were in any case crammed with unwanted bloatware).

      One of the reasons I like OSX - no product key complications, and the "family edition" or corporate licenses aren't outrageously expensive.

    5. Re:Piracy without guns and ships? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I started this post with the idea that I would make a joke similar to what RMS says about piracy requiring guns and ships but when I stopped to think about the words pirate and piracy, it really is odd that they're used when software is executed outside the limits of a license.

      RMS obviously believe in the Big Lie principle - repeat a lie often enough and loudly enough, and people start to treat it as truth. (Hint: Use of the word piracy for violating copyright goes back centuries.)
       

      It's totally reasonable in the face of ridiculous license terms to want to get past all that and just use the software. That's why we've gone from no product keys to product keys to activation and now to automatic auditing like Windows Genuine Advantage.

      No, we've gone that route because of people like yourself who mistakenly believe that it's OK to break the law because they don't like the law.

  24. rat them out! by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    I was in this situation once and I flatly refused to install the unlicensed software. If you have mentioned the issue to management, they already see you as someone they can't trust. You may as well report them to https://reporting.bsa.org/usa/home.aspx or the like, because your days are numbered at this company.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  25. How much do you like your job? by nweaver · · Score: 1

    If you don't like your job, get a new one and then as you leave, snitch to the BSA for the bounty money.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  26. great argument for free software by mhamel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Offer a solution. If you go to your boss's office and tell him he is a thief he's not going to be happy. But if you get in there and offer a free alternative it should be a good way of bringing things up.

    Openoffice can do the job if everybody switch together. 7-zip is a good replacement for winzip. I'm pretty sure lot's of software has free (like in open source) alternative. Try, you'll see where it lead you. :-)

  27. Standard Reply by dcollins · · Score: 1

    Document, CYA, think about finding a new job (under the principle that this is one symptom of management that is likely poor in lots of ways).

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  28. Common cause of termination in bad startups by presidenteloco · · Score: 4, Informative

    A friend of mine was uncomfortable with using the pirated s/w at her company and so switched her computer and work products
    from (pirated) Office to OpenOffice, (pirated) MatLab to Octave, and VBA to python. She also brought the overall issue up with the CEO, suggesting
    that the company should pay for its payware, or switch to FOSS.

    Needless to say, not long afterwards, she was terminated with some lame excuse but it's clear it was for not being a "team player".

    The 95% of the technology startups in our town are laughingly underfunded
    (e.g. reverse mortgage on CEO's house and small contribution from Aunt Tilly's bakery), so they have no
    money for legit licenses. Unfortunately, the management at many are too stupid to understand that there are perfectly good FOSS
    alternatives for all of it.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Firing someone who can financially sink the company by reporting stuff to the BSA doesn't seem like a good idea.

    2. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the management at many are too stupid

      No wonder the tech startups in your town are underfunded. Maybe they "stupid management" companies should go out of business and make room for "smart management" companies/opportunities/whatever..

    3. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the BSA wont come after every tip they get. they only do around 10-15% at best.

    4. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Neither does using pirated software in the workplace where this sort of stuff is bound to happen...

      But there you have it.

    5. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by Kjella · · Score: 1

      She also brought the overall issue up with the CEO, suggesting that the company should pay for its payware, or switch to FOSS.

      Needless to say, not long afterwards, she was terminated with some lame excuse

      That's when you call the BSA and take their reward money with glee. That's at least what I would have done.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by Alpha+Soixante-Neuf · · Score: 1

      I think there's a very strange attitude towards FOSS with some business managers or small business owners. I have mentioned these alternatives to people (it's not my job, but you meet people in these situations) who complain about the cost of upgrading windows software and always encountered a weird resistance. They don't usually say flat out no, but they always hedge around it so you get the idea they aren't the slightest bit interested. I think it's about a fear for their image (at least that's the only way I can make sense of it). They're imagining having to call a client and ask for a word document saved in some weird format, basically outing them as too cheap for "professional" applications. Maybe that's not it, but it's certainly the impression I've gotten over the years whenever I try to broach the subject. IMO saving a couple grand (at least, the larger the company the larger the savings) annually on readily available free software without any concerns for piracy makes such incredible sense for so many small business, it's really a shame people aren't willing to do the hour or two of research finding out about the alternatives and getting rid of their own misperceptions.

      --
      "The world is a tragedy to those who feel, and comedy to those who think." -- Shakespeare
    7. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I actually don't think it's as simple as that.

      As soon as you go outside the relatively mainstream and/or "sexy" problems, F/OSS ceases to be a panacea. It's often hard to find something appropriate and when you do you'll have to pay someone who really knows what they're doing to get everything working nicely together. And industry-specific software is invariably an arm and a leg to license.

      There is a reason that hosted apps are becoming popular. Take a typical costing example, £20/user/month, no need to pay anyone to set anything up, no need to pay expensive licensing fees upfront, no need to buy a server and find somewhere to put it? Money talks, and when it's a choice between that or find the barrier to getting your small business off the ground is unrealistically high it talks pretty damn loudly.

    8. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad that education can solve these problems. But even if people like this were educated about the availability of FOSS alternatives, it would require further education to be able to comfortably use these alternatives and feel like there is support available if needed. And so they have to make a decision. Do I use what I know, but use it illegally, and run the risks associated with that? In return I would be able to quickly move past the software issues at hand and on to the business I'm running. Or do I take to time to find alternatives and learn how to use them, along with my employees? In return I save money (and/or reduce risk) but my time to run the business is reduced.

      For some the choice is clear. For others the choice is clear.

    9. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to be clear, Octave is NOT a replacement for MATLAB. Sure the languages are broadly compatible, but that's like saying Notepad++ is a reasonable replacement for MS Word.

    10. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The 95% of the technology startups in our town are laughingly underfunded (e.g. reverse mortgage on CEO's house and small contribution from Aunt Tilly's bakery), so they have no money for legit licenses.

      In many cases, a true startup can actually get licenses for much less than usual even for non-free software. E.g. Microsoft has BizSpark for developer shops with annual revenue less than $1M, where you get a full set of development tools (highest tier; i.e. VS Team Suite, not Pro or Standard, with TFS etc) and server software to run your code if it requires any such (Windows Server/IIS, MSSQL, SharePoint etc - again, highest tier) with no upfront payment, and with a $100 liability if you exit the program - either of your own accord, or in 3 years after you've started. Once your revenue exceeds $1M annually, then you have to pay the full price to continue using the licenses (or, again, pay $100 to simply drop out).

      I'm not familiar with similar programs of other companies, but I'm sure it's not an isolated case. It sounds like a pretty decent business model to me - give expensive tools to people for free, and only ask for payment if/when they start earning enough money to easily pay you the full cost. It's much better than same people just picking free offerings over yours in the first place to avoid the costs.

    11. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by jimicus · · Score: 1

      It's been a problem since before people were regularly exchanging documents and data over the Internet.

      My own mother bought a PC partly because she thought people were "laughing at her" for using something else, and that was in the mid 1990's.

    12. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The 95% of the technology startups in our town are laughingly underfunded

      Having seen a few startups, and read the descriptions of many more, I suspect the opposite is true: 95% of the technology startups have utterly no clue when it comes to budgeting and financial matters, little or business sense or skills, and no interest in learning. 'Underfunding' is a symptom, not a cause.

    13. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has many programs to help tech startups get their software very cheaply, like bizspark and the action pack subscription. If you're a tech startup that's pirating microsoft software, you probably haven't done your homework.

    14. Re:Common cause of termination in bad startups by Quantumstate · · Score: 1

      Surely they have a pretty solid case for unfair dismissal, I would imagine the company would settle out of court rather than have the facts exposed and face a hefty fine for both things.

  29. My job used to be like this.... by ajlisows · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am a sysadm/web developer for a smallish manufacturing business. When I got here, there licensing was a complete and utter mess. They had about half the number of Office licenses as needed (And half of those were Home/Student Edition), they had a centralized AV solution that they were still getting updates for but hadn't paid for in three years, and just overall were NOT compliant.

    I brought it to the company president's attention. Buying 40 Office licenses at a time (Probably around $10000 for Small Business) as well as 70-80 AV subscriptions (Maybe another $2000), and various other server and client software (Around $12,000 more) was not something they wanted to do. They did agree to take it slow and get legit over a period of time. During that period, I did install Office on more machines but they bought the licenses over a period of 18 months. In the end, I am happy to say we are nearly 100% compliant.

    So I guess instead of going to him with a HUGE bill, maybe write up a plan to go legit over the next year or two. They may balk at a one time large sum of money but be willing to pay $1000 here, $2000 there or something. Worked for me. If the company is too cheap to even do that, you probably aren't going to you as an employee and are probably better off starting to look around....

    1. Re:My job used to be like this.... by lonestarw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would have to agree with your approach...develop a budget and heck buy computers with office installed if you have to. I worked for a company that I slowly added OSS alternatives where I could. Also Document your concerns that way if any legal issues come up it all points to the management...not you.

    2. Re:My job used to be like this.... by oatworm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yep - did the same thing at a company I worked for. Similar situation - their former "IT Manager" bought a copy of Office from Best Buy and installed it on all of the computers in the office, then called in to activate whenever it would fail the key check (which was frequently), along with a host of other software. I led with a carrot and a stick - we didn't have to become legit with everything all at once, but if steps weren't taking to become legit, there was "a greater than zero chance" that the BSA would sooner or later come knocking (never mind how they would know to look...). So, since a hardware refresh was coming up, they just bought an initial pack of Office Open Licensing to get started, then purchased an additional one whenever they replaced a PC. After a couple of years, one license at a time, they became compliant and all is good. Best of all, it spread the cost of compliance out so that, instead of shelling out tens of thousand of dollars in Office licensing all at once, they could spread it out over time. As an added bonus, if anybody did ask, they could honestly say they were taking steps to bring themselves into compliance.

      That said, in my case, I had an advantage - the owner of the company didn't realize what the IT Manager was doing and wasn't terribly happy about it when she found out. In the original questioner's case, however, that might not be the case. If you can't find someone higher than you and/or your manager that's willing to support your efforts to bring the company into compliance, either through replacing existing software with legitimately free alternatives or through purchasing licensing (or some combination of the two), follow what everyone else is saying here: Document like mad, update your CV, and call the BSA.

    3. Re:My job used to be like this.... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      This, actually, is probably the most sensible solution here. It's reasonable, it's not too confrontational, it tries to find a solution without asking the CEO to sign off the equivalent of a person's salary for six months in one big lump.

      I would add that if you really do succeed in bringing this up diplomatically (and no, marching into the CEOs office and saying "We owe Microsoft, Adobe et al tens of thousands of dollars, we must pay them now or stop using all of their software immediately" is not diplomatic) and you still get ignored, then you can be fairly certain that the respect the company has for you is approximately zero.

    4. Re:My job used to be like this.... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      That's the basic approach that I took. When I started back in 2000, licensing and compliance was a disaster. Tackling it all at once was a non-starter. Our compromise was that any new machine coming in the door had to be purchased with legit licenses. So we went legal within the course of a normal hardware refresh cycle.

      Plus, we've switched as much as possible to open source or pure free alternatives. Moving from SourceOffSite to SVN, from SQL Server to PostgreSQL, from Windows servers to Linux, etc.

      I hate keeping track of licenses.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    5. Re:My job used to be like this.... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I hate keeping track of licenses.

      Being as I regularly have to do so, I have reached an inescapable conclusion.

      The commercial software industry does not want you to be able to keep track of licenses.

      Why on Earth would I say this? Simple:

      - You're dealing with a product which by definition can be copied fairly easily. It follows that you need an auditing programme in addition to any asset tracking you apply to software. BUT....
      - Packages have wildly varying license terms which can't easily be audited for. It's OK to install most Adobe software on two computers at once provided it's impossible that it will be in use on both computers at once. So a copy on a person's company-provided PC at home and the same copy on their PC at work is fine. How on Earth do you audit for things like that?
      - No software application I am aware of makes the job of auditing for that particular piece of software easy. Applications frequently change the only registry entry which announces what version is installed when a patch is released, even though the software is only licensed according to major version. Vendors seldom, if ever publish a list of the checksums of all major, minor and patched versions of the .exe which actually starts up the application so you can compare the checksum of what's on your PC with the list to find out which version you have and marry this up with what you're licensed for.
      - Software auditing packages are (by quite some margin) some of the most odious things I've ever evaluated. They frequently have one or more of the following "features":

              + License terms rather more onerous than the actual packages you're auditing for.
              + A recommended deployment mechanism which is still stuck in the mid 1990's. ("Visit each PC in turn and run the program, save the results to a shared drive or a floppy")
              + Don't actually audit anything reliably. (Checking the registry but not scanning for executables is just not adequate considering the costs involved in doing it wrong).
              + No sensible reporting of any description. (No I do not want to go through a list of applications for every PC and marry it up with my own invoices. Why can't I just tell the application what I've bought and have it alert me to any discrepancies?)
              + Generate enormous quantities of data but provide no way to turn that into information. (Windows itself ships with dozens, if not hundreds of executables and many other commercial packages contain several small executables. I don't need to know the name of every one of these, nor do I care about licenses for Internet Explorer. I understand that you can't be expected to know every nuance of every package out there, but why can't I say "Ignore this from now on" or "File it under the heading of Ships as part of X"?)
              + Conspicuously ignore important things. (Fonts are licensed too, y'know)

      - License terms that are so difficult to understand that you come away feeling there's something very important you've missed. Show me a company that runs every software package they want to buy past their lawyers first, I'll show you a liar.

    6. Re:My job used to be like this.... by FrigBot · · Score: 1

      That's basically what was done at my company. Originally the network was set up by my boss who used all pirated software. This isa small engineering company. But it's owned by a larger corpaorate parent, and this office is inside the main headquarters. Anyway, i ddin't even realize as an average user that everythjing was bogus until they hired a real IT guy who started diggin all this up. He took about 6 months but I think it's all legit now. Incidentally I'm not happy with openoffice, though I have nothing against it personally, and do miss having acrobat pro and the cad software this thing had before.

      I was mad about all this and told my boss that he should have just paid for the stuipid MS licenses when setting up the computers, when business was booming. But now we're stuck with the current situation. I believe this goes on all the time, and especially in small engineering companies.

    7. Re:My job used to be like this.... by Imrik · · Score: 1

      This is a decent solution, but it only works if you can convince the person in charge that there's actually a problem.

    8. Re:My job used to be like this.... by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      Definitely, and that is why I wrote the last part of my post. "If the company is too cheap to even do that, you probably aren't going to you as an employee and are probably better off starting to look around...." If it is the kind of place that doesn't care that they are doing illegal things (or doesn't listen to or believe you when you explain to them what they are doing is illegal), I think it is likely that they will also not listen to you when you don't have the time/hardware/software to complete a project, when you have a great idea to implement something that will make everyone's life easier, when you need extra time off, when you have not gotten a raise in five years, etc.

      Those types of places that show little regard for the law in terms of their network probably have letter regard for the techs they have working on it.

    9. Re:My job used to be like this.... by ProKras · · Score: 1

      I agree that a gradual approach is probably the best. I was lucky enough to be brought on board as IT manager (for a small accounting firm) just when the company was expanding and purchasing a lot of new hardware. From the beginning I advocated using as much FOSS as possible. Management, who had never heard of the concept, was excited that they could get legit, good quality software at no cost. There was a bit of grumbling in the beginning about some of the FOSS since there was a learning curve for some. Once people got used to it, though, it became a non-issue. For any non-open-source software that was free (as in beer) I made doubly sure that commercial use was permitted under the free license, otherwise it was gone. I was also fortunate in that the most critical software for the firm was already SaaS, and there was no need to change there.

      As we upgraded the existing hardware, any questionable software on the old hardware has been removed and replaced with FOSS, or software that was definitely properly licensed. Now nearly everyone is now using OpenOffice.org, although we do have a couple of machines with legit Microsoft Office licenses (necessary, for example, when we have a spreadsheet that requires macros to work right. Also, the boss wanted to keep Outlook because of some issues with scheduling meetings with clients in Thunderbird+Lighting). In cases where no good FOSS alternative was available, we purchased (legit, unused) licenses from ebay or elsewhere, and documented this fully in case of any audits down the road. (If a license sounded like it MIGHT not be legit we stayed away. We looked for original disks, packaging and manuals before buying.)

      The most important step, I believe, was to get management interested in the idea of FOSS early on as an alternative to more expensive options. I also gently warned them about the potential for software "not working right" if it was not properly licensed (because of lack of updates or activation issues). I never had to mention the BSA at all to convince management that adopting FOSS was a smart move.

  30. Two suggestions... by norletsk · · Score: 1

    If you like the company and/or your job, I would get a copy of the license agreement for the software that you believe is pirated and show it to the boss. Explain how what you have observed violates the license and suggest that the company either pay for the software or make the transition to free software. Alternatively, if you don't like the company, I'm sure you've seen the BSA ads all over Slashdot.

    1. Re:Two suggestions... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Dude No.
      From the story it seems very clear that the piracy policy is actually coming from the top, and that everyone else in the company knows but has quietly accepted it.
      Rubbing the bosses nose in the fact that you know about his dirty laundry will likely just get you seen as a troublemaker and even maybe fired.
      I think an anonymous tipoff to the BSA is overdue here.

    2. Re:Two suggestions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think an anonymous tipoff to the BSA is overdue here.

      Nah. Wait until the submitter has at least a good line on a new job. Then call the BSA.

  31. Happens all the time by eln · · Score: 3, Funny
  32. Get Out. Sleep Better. by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't think that the company president who "didn't know he was using pirated software" won't serve you up as the sacrificial lamb to the Powers That Be in a heartbeat when some disgruntled ex-employee rats to the BSA. At that point, you'll be out of a job the hard way, with the kind of black stain on a record that no young IT guy wants to have.

  33. What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Information wants to be free!!

    1. Re:What do you expect? by sbeckstead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Software engineers, designers and the guys who advertise and sell the software want to be paid! Get your free info by generating it yourself.

    2. Re:What do you expect? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Obviously said by someone who's never put a lot of work into a program, video, script, or anything else that requires creative work, then wondered why he wasn't making money on it.

      If I build a house, I get paid by the people who use it. If I put the same effort into, say, a film script, that might take anywhere from 6 weeks to a year to write, why should people get it for free?

      Interesting how the kiddies who've never had to work for a living thing they should get everything for free and don't have the backbone to produce anything worthwhile in exchange. They're the real users or AOLusers -- use and use and too impotent to produce on their own.

    3. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I build a house, I get paid by the people who use it. If I put the same effort into, say, a film script, that might take anywhere from 6 weeks to a year to write, why should people get it for free?

      If you build a house you get paid ONCE by the people who use it. Why should one effort at a film script (or software or music, etc.) grant you income for life? Maybe you should just get paid for it for 6 weeks to a year or however long it took to create. The idea that you should be paid for life (plus!) for a relatively short period of work is as ridiculous, if not more so, than people thinking they should get everything for free.

    4. Re:What do you expect? by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      If you build a house you get paid ONCE by the people who use it. Why should one effort at a film script (or software or music, etc.) grant you income for life?

      That's just a matter of accounting. The writers could just charge more up-front and end up with the same amount earned at the end of the road.

      The issue is not with how long they're paid, it's with how much they're paid. Do you think writers are overpaid? What do you base this on?

    5. Re:What do you expect? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      First off, if you write a film script, you likely do get paid once. Say you get $500k for a script that turns into a $100 million dollar grossing movie. Most writers don't get "points" or residuals.

      Conversely, if you built Disneyland, even though you built it once, you get reoccuring income from that investment.

      Your analogy that people shouldn't pay for IP because you assume the creator of IP is getting rich for life is asinine.

      Creators of content deserve the right to be paid for the work. End of story.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    6. Re:What do you expect? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because just because you put effort into it doesn't guarantee you can make a profit off of it, even if you intend to do so. Houses are scarce resources; information is reproducible and not scarce. It's not that you don't "deserve" compensation or that it "should" be free, it's that simply that technology is changing everything. Because I put effort into mowing my lawn, does not mean I should be able to charge people for looking at it or making copies of a photograph of it. It's ludicrous to say that you own a particular configuration of 1s and 0s, just as it would be ludicrous to say you own a particular wavelength on the electromagnetic spectrum or particular frequency of sound. Same going with those ridiculous patents on genes/genetic codes.

      If houses could be copied and replicated through future technology then I will say the same thing in that case as well.

    7. Re:What do you expect? by timlyg · · Score: 0

      The writer should know their own value. If they are overpaid then act accordingly - plenty of solutions since the money is theirs to spend.

      If they are underpaid, then try to find a more subtle solution, not sue this sue that, patent this patent that.

      Understanding this, we conclude that a rich and famous writer doesn't necessary mean he/she is very good at writing; and we will learn that some poor and unknown writer may be beyond his/her time. And that the concept of Copyright will always be corrupted when $ and court are involved together.

    8. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I build a house, I get paid by the people who use it. If I put the same effort into, say, a film script, that might take anywhere from 6 weeks to a year to write, why should people get it for free?

      If I build a house I get paid once for building it, so why should you write a script, get paid, then get paid royalties forever?

      But still that's a bad analogy

    9. Re:What do you expect? by kirillian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bull-shit...no one DESERVES the right to get paid. That's a moral/ethical argument that has nothing to do with reality. It may be true (I hold to it personally...probably in a lesser way than you), but that doesn't matter when reality comes into the picture. Truth is, economically speaking, the MARKET determines who DESERVES to get paid or not...not you or I. The frustrations that many have is the artificial legislation of who deserves pay. It disrupts the entire market and takes the decision-making out of the hands of those who are paying, leaving consumers bitter and angry at the fact that they can't even choose who or what to pay for (hence why people hate taxation time).

      At least quit arguing from an emotional standpoint...take the time to make informed and reasonable arguments rather than dragging your moral/ethical standpoints in. I hate some of this crap too, but it doesn't have to be a part of the argument. It sounds like you may have a personal stake in this. If so, think about it from this way...Would it bother you if I demanded that your right to choose be taken away from you because I think that I deserve something? Ya, it might be a little extreme in some cases, but, the arguments that you make really do boil down to such a plea.

    10. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I build a house, I get paid by the people who use it.

      No, you get paid IF someone wants it. And then you just get paid by that one person. Not the millions and millions of friends they allow to live there with them.

      Funny, though, how all the other "builders" are making record profits off of their "houses," in spite of (actually, because of - get a clue) the ability to "live in" them for free. Your "house" must just suck.

    11. Re:What do you expect? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Pure logic.

      Creating a product that others use entitles you to get paid. You deserve the get paid.

      How MUCH you get paid is set by market value.

      I can't help that you're all upset by your moral/ethical values to the point that you can't comprehend the SIMPLEST of logical statements.

      If you can't keep up, then don't bother posting.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    12. Re:What do you expect? by wesman83 · · Score: 1

      Because just because you put effort into it doesn't guarantee you can make a profit off of it, even if you intend to do so.

      totally. its a logical fallacy that by putting work into something you therefore get something in return/own product of work... it could be that your work is just 'lost' and you gain nothing besides the value of the work itself. its up to the society to chose which is rewarded - if you put work in and don't obtain ownership, society should ensure that your work benefits all and not just a privileged few.

    13. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a reason why things are like this, and that's because no one would bother writing professional-quality software if they didn't get paid enough for it. Think all you want about how immaterial things should be free, but if all information somehow had to be free then you wouldn't have anymore professional software around, you'd be stuck with crap like GIMP or Blender and would never again see anything like Photoshop or 3DS Max. There's thousands of man-hours of work that go into each such commercial program, man-hours from highly qualified and well-paid people. Someone has to pay for that work, cause if no one does then these people won't touch that ever again and look for a real job that pays.

      It's ludicrous to say that you own a particular configuration of 1s and 0s

      That's the stupidest fucking argument on the topic I've ever heard. If everything comes down to just a bunch of 1s and 0s, then why don't you just create them as you need them? Oh, what's that? Creating what you want is non-trivial and the only way to create that is to do it the way it's currently done, which costs money? By the way, not believing in private property is communism. It's like, someone painstakingly creates something and then some wanker like you comes up and goes "this is now property of the people, thank you".

      TL;DR you sound like a broke ass basement dweller who wants all his porn, games, movies and music for free cause has no money, and who'd never create anything worth a dime, so it's easy for you to whine and demand that everything is offered to you for free. I'm a self employed software developer and make a living off a program I created all on my own, I create value with my work, you wouldn't know what that means.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    14. Re:What do you expect? by BobMcD · · Score: 0, Troll

      If I build a house, I get paid by the people who use it. If I put the same effort into, say, a film script, that might take anywhere from 6 weeks to a year to write, why should people get it for free?

      If you duplicate a house you should certainly get compensated for the time, effort, and materials involved in doing so.

      If you invent a concept as fundamentally useful to humanity as a house you certainly deserve to be well-cared for throughout the remainder of your life.

      If you duplicate a creative work, again, compensation is in order. The issue is, it doesn't take so long to do that, and the value of the time, effort, and materials doesn't amount to much.

      If you invent a creative work you certainly do deserve compensation, and again if it is as absolutely fundamental as the concept of the house is to humanity, you deserve much reward for doing so. If it is less epic than that, you should expect less reward. If it is the utter tripe found in most of what Hollywood and/or popular music emits, even less so.

      Furthermore if you spent six weeks to a year creating the ultimate World of Warcraft character, complete with all the trimmings, do you likewise expect to be rewarded for life? Or can we agree that certain measures of time, effort, and materials get more compensation than others do?

    15. Re:What do you expect? by Dorsai65 · · Score: 1

      "information is reproducible and not scarce"

      Information, yes; a newly-created something-or-other (script, novel, song, etc) not so much. Sure, all the words and everything were already there, but the act of creativity needed to put them together in a new and different way... that's something worth being compensated for if/when someone(s) find it worthwhile. Yes, technology is changing everything -- by making it far too easy for people to simply copy the efforts of someone else without compensating that person.

      To use your lawn analogy, it's as if you put a lot of time and effort into growing a nice flower garden, and everyone that passes by takes one of the flowers. Of course, in this example, we're dealing with a physical object (the flowers), versus the intangible of a created work, but the underlying principle still applies: person A putting time and effort into the act of creation, and persons B thru n+1 taking it without paying. It is that particular configuration of 1's and 0's that represent the end result of that creativity.

      --
      --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
    16. Re:What do you expect? by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      Information does not want to be anthropomorphized. It hates it when you do that.

    17. Re:What do you expect? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Use the whole of the RIAA's rules.

      When you build a house, the people who live in it don't own it, they only have a right to use it. They may not allow anyone else to use it, so no friends coming over for a party. No pictures containing any portion of the house may be shown to friends/family. They are not allowed to sell it, since they don't own it. Any people driving past you house that accidently see it, must pay a fee to the realtor.

      As for paying you to build it, you'll have to wait to get your cut from the realtor after he takes his percentage, advertising, packaging, etc. Don't wory, the $2.00 you make on each house is all yours, after taxes, union dues, manditory donations, etc.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    18. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice this analogy only ever goes one way.

      If I build a house, I don't get paid by the people who use it. I get paid by the people who buy it from me. Once. They're free to rent it out to a tenant, who won't owe me a dime, or to sell it to another person, who doesn't owe me a dime. They're free to leave it to their children, who also don't owe me a dime. I don't get to keep extracting money from everyone who lives in the house for decades. If I die, my children, my relatives, people who had nothing to do with the construction of the house, can neither expect nor rely on a steady flow of income from whoever goes on using the house for decades after I'm dead.

      And I note that the people who work for a living, engaged in the strenuous physical effort of building houses, don't suggest that it should be that way. It's only the people who think sitting in an air-conditioned office lifting nothing heavier than a mouse or a MIDI keyboard who think that way.

    19. Re:What do you expect? by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that both consumers and producers want value for their money/time spent, but neither have a good way to measure that value. Producers of copyright content want to get paid, but instead of always charging upfront for the total cost of production they want it to be paid over time; the problem has crept in where in hope of getting more and more money the time that they "require" for full payment had become too long to outweigh its possible benefits to the creator versus its toll on society as a whole. The consumer, OTOH, want to pay as little as possible for as much as possible. Now that content can be distributed so cheaply that most consider it "free", we've hit smack up against the creators wanting to get their payment over time as people won't keep paying. The solution? Patronage. Pay up front for creations which are societally valuable; either through NEA grants, or private co-operatives (like businesses) that pay for the production of a product and first release, then let the product be copied at will. The creator gets paid (maybe not what they'd like to get paid, but they can always find another job), and the consumer gets the price that they want. There would be a contracting effect on content creation in that it will drive out the people who are only in it for the money, but can't you tell when a product has been created out of love (Primer) rather than greed (*cough*Transformers*cough*)already ?

      The measured value problem doesn't go away completely, but it's alleviated to a great degree. After all, right now people think that they get their music and movies for free and try to ignore (or get angry with) the deferred cost of worrying about prosecution for copyright violation, the cost of having their politicians bought by media interest groups that otherwise wouldn't have been motivated to buy so many congresscritters, and by the more and more draconian laws that are developed. As you pointed out above, people disconnect between the taxes they pay and what is purchased with that money. Everyone loves roads, but no one likes to pay tolls. And people really forget that they are voting every time they pay or don't pay for a product which they consume, when they ignore political debate, and even when they decide not to vote.

    20. Re:What do you expect? by BlueShirt · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you said, except for the thing about communists not believing in private property. I've been assured they do, they just believe everybody should have some.

    21. Re:What do you expect? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Your taking a flower from the garden does not apply because the flower is a scarce and not-producible. If you could make a copy of that flower, then you would have an analogous argument.

    22. Re:What do you expect? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      But when the owners decide to sell, the builders don't get a cut. When people go in and out of the building the builders don get a cut. Copyright holders are trying to do both. I'm saying this because the builder example is a poor one.

    23. Re:What do you expect? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By the way, not believing in private property is communism.

      You make a pretty big leap, saying that disagreeing with the current application of intellectual property laws is the same as not believing in ownership of private property.

      If you make something, you deserve to charge money for it. It's a big jump to then say that your great great great grandchildren should also make money from it. An even bigger jump to say that you can transfer your rights to someone else who can then make money from it in perpetuity and an even bigger jump to say that the people who buy your product don't really own it but are only leasing it for however long you say and not a moment longer.

      The notion that intellectual property rights have certain limits, especially on the length of time you can claim those rights has been part of the laws of copyright and patent for a very long time. Given the ephemeral nature of ideas, this makes sense and has been a system that works. It's only since certain people, usually not the people who actually come up with the ideas, have started trying to assert longer and longer copyright periods, limiting the rights of the purchaser and coming up with perverted notions such as "licensing" products to consumers instead of "selling" those products, that there has been a serious pushback from consumers.

      Making things and buying and selling those things is a two-way transaction that has been part of the social contract for a long time. Recently, one side of that transaction has decided to assert their financial power by making the rules of the transaction less equitable. That has caused many people on the other side of the transaction to believe the whole setup is bad, which leads to widespread rulebreaking.

      You can say that the people breaking the rules are criminals or communists or even terrorists, but it would be easier to swallow these assertions if those on the supply side of the transaction had acted in good faith from the beginning. Unfortunately, "taking advantage of a powerful position" has become a sacred rite in the religion of free market economics. So, you end up with a surprising number of people who lose respect for the entire transaction. Maybe it's in the nature of human societies that every so often, when a transaction becomes unbalanced, that there is a widespread breakdown in following the rules which escalates until the system can be retooled. This seems to be what's happening in the realm of "intellectual property" (and, I can argue, in the entire system we know as "capitalism").

      Behaviors that should have ended with feudalism now become "good business practice". No wonder so many people now believe that all of free market economics is a scam. One thing for sure, it's unlikely the system is going to be fixed by escalating the inequity of the transaction.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting how the kiddies who've never had to work for a living thing they should get everything for free and don't have the backbone to produce anything worthwhile in exchange.

      Too many people today, especially my generation, expect things for free. They want free software, "free" school, "free" health care, "free" housing, "free" college, "free" food, etc.

    25. Re:What do you expect? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are confusing the utilitarian aspect of someone (i.e., the government) protecting original ideas versus a morally justified right to having that idea protected.

      I like how you implied I don't believe in private property because I believe scarcity is the main factor in property rights--I argued that anything scarce should be considered to be property. Anything that cannot be informationally copied. That's the difference between stealing and transcribing a book.

      A more easy way to look at it is the level of arbitrariness involved in protection of this "property." Intellectual property rights are entirely arbitrary--the number of years you have a right to it, what IS and ISN'T considered fair use, those are all completely arbitrary and vary from nation to nation. You cannot merely know without being told beforehand what your intellectual property "rights" are. With scarce property, such as a chair or so on, your rights are pretty intuitive and more basic.

      There's a reason why things are like this, and that's because no one would bother writing professional-quality software if they didn't get paid enough for it. Think all you want about how immaterial things should be free, but if all information somehow had to be free then you wouldn't have anymore professional software around, you'd be stuck with crap like GIMP or Blender and would never again see anything like Photoshop or 3DS Max. There's thousands of man-hours of work that go into each such commercial program, man-hours from highly qualified and well-paid people. Someone has to pay for that work, cause if no one does then these people won't touch that ever again and look for a real job that pays.

      Again, that is a utilitarian argument and not a moral one. Or more accurately, that is an argument out of convenience and not out of whether it's right or wrong, and you have not established why it's wrong to copy software, merely that negative consequences will result (and I do not deny that).

      That's the stupidest fucking argument on the topic I've ever heard. If everything comes down to just a bunch of 1s and 0s, then why don't you just create them as you need them? Oh, what's that? Creating what you want is non-trivial and the only way to create that is to do it the way it's currently done, which costs money? By the way, not believing in private property is communism. It's like, someone painstakingly creates something and then some wanker like you comes up and goes "this is now property of the people, thank you".

      I'm not saying people are owed or deserve that software for free, merely that copying software is not unethical because information is not [i]materially scarce[/i] (your usage of scarcity was an equivocation).

      Saying that because thinking up or implementing a good idea grants you magical exclusive rights to it is ridiculous. It is like arguing that being the first to think of and implement a new scientific experimental paradigm grants you the exclusive right to that experimental paradigm. It's ridiculous.

      I would say that you do deserve to get paid for your software, but given your hysterical yet amusing attitude I would be interested in knowing what program you made so I can torrent it :) Who knows... maybe I'll start really soon :)

    26. Re:What do you expect? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Anyway, you are equivocating with the word "scarcity." I am referring to material scarcity, while you are referring to scarcity of originality. But an original idea no more belongs to someone than an original sound. It's like saying the first person to ever make a pizza has the exclusive rights to the pizza recipe. He has exclusive rights to the pizzas he makes, but not to "pizza" in general. And yet that is exactly the idea behind so-called "intellectual property".

    27. Re:What do you expect? by frogzilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This intrigues me. If I build a house and then sell it the new owners are free to do whatever they want to it. They can modify it, they can rent it, they can sell it (for profit), they could even destroy it. What about movie scripts (books)? It seems to me the same things are possible and even likely to happen. Why exactly is software different? Should it be different?

    28. Re:What do you expect? by severoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's ludicrous to say that you own a particular configuration of 1s and 0s

      That's the stupidest fucking argument on the topic I've ever heard. If everything comes down to just a bunch of 1s and 0s, then why don't you just create them as you need them? Oh, what's that? Creating what you want is non-trivial and the only way to create that is to do it the way it's currently done, which costs money? By the way, not believing in private property is communism. It's like, someone painstakingly creates something and then some wanker like you comes up and goes "this is now property of the people, thank you".

      (Please bear in mind that I didn't read the grandpappy post, just the bit you quoted and your response.)

      The FOSS movement does not equate the two concepts "a particular configuration of 1s and 0s" and "creat[ing that sequence of 1s and 0s] as you need them" as you have. The problem is in the notion of doing something cool once and then making money off of it for the rest of your life when there is zero cost to mass produce (i.e., make digital copies). This is where the FOSS movement and I part ways a bit, because FOSS says that it's "unethical" to do this. I'm not quite sure what that means, but I know if the cost of mass producing something is negligible, it's certainly impractical at the very least.

      From the standpoint of a healthy capitalist society, I regard software more as a service (and don't confused SaaS here, I'm talking about box software like Windows) than a product. Capitalism is supposed to reward people for doing useful work. Patents and copyrights were originally conceived to do this, but over time they've become more and more about allowing one to rest on one's laurels and live a life of luxury for having done that one cool thing. I'm not exactly sure where this expectation of entitlement comes from...what other line of work doesn't require you to show up everyday to get a paycheck?

      The "service" part of software comes in the form of extension and support. If I make something cool and release it for free, I may be paid to support it (ongoing labor), or even extend it (short-term labor at a particular customer's behest). Even in the case of being paid to do an extension I otherwise would not have done, I as the developer and strongly incented to release it for free to all because it presumably makes my original software more valuable and will drive further business.

      Not coincidentally, this is actually how most commercial software companies actually work. I used to work for a well-known company that made marketing software, and they would routinely cut their prices 50%, even up to 90% to make a big sale. That sounds crazy until you understand the logic of it, which was to lock up the far more valuable support contract. In other words, what the market was saying is that the software itself wasn't valuable to customers—the support and ability to get feature requests answered, on the other hand, was. And so the pricing structure reflected that...give (or nearly give) the software away, and charge the real bucks for what the buyer is actually willing to pay for.

      This happened on nearly every deal at that company, and it led me to wonder why they even bothered with charging at all...why not just give it away for free download on the website? Sure, a lot of small fish that otherwise wouldn't be able to afford it would start using it without ever paying a dime into the system...but so what? We weren't going to make money off of them anyway, and by removing the barrier to entry we open the door to at least small or one-time support fees, get better feedback for laying out our roadmap, and potentially deprive a competitor of a sale, increasing our own marketshare.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    29. Re:What do you expect? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      If you invent a concept as fundamentally useful to humanity as a house you certainly deserve to be well-cared for throughout the remainder of your life.

      Unsupported assertion. What do you base this on?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    30. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's nice, but that's off-topic. No one talked about Walt Disney making money off Mickey Mouse for a thousand years, right now we're talking about piracy and whether or not everything binary should be free. Whether or not my descendants will be able to make money off what I do now doesn't even begin to matter.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    31. Re:What do you expect? by fudoniten · · Score: 1

      ....Or you could come up with a business plan that works, and doesn't rely on government enforcement.

      I manage to get by without a single piece of "professional software"...in fact, I thrive without it, and do my best to avoid having to deal with or support it.

      I think you missed his point about the 1's and 0's. It's not that they're easy to put together a certain way; but ownership of what amounts to one big number is hard to support. Maybe you should get paid for organizing them (so to speak) instead of claiming ownership after the fact.

    32. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ludicrous to say that you own a bunch of atoms spun together with electrons spinning around them. Same logic as owning 1's and 0's.

    33. Re:What do you expect? by conspirator57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      there are other considerations for society as explicitly discussed in the case law and other sources. however, i'm not necessarily even that put out by lifetime copyright, even though the original term of copyright was 10 years (and authors could lose copyright protection before their books were even well known due to the means of travel and communication of the time (horse and sailing ship)).

      The problem with infinite copyright is that it stifles innovation the same as no copyright does. People are restrained by copyright from riffing off prior work. This can have negative societal consequences as political, social, and philosophical works frequently need to reference the current art. It's very onerous to tell people to buy 100 books because they're all still under copyright when excerpts would be more appropriate.

      In addition, my biggest beef is the continual extension of copyright beyond the lifetime of the author solely to preserve Disney's profits because they're too lazy to invent new content or use trademark protection for mickey's damned ears.

      Walt Disney's dead. Unless he's a follower of ancient Egyptian religion, he can't take it with him. His kids need to figure out how to make money themselves.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    34. Re:What do you expect? by pmontra · · Score: 1

      By the way, not believing in private property is communism

      Not really: there is no private property because everything belongs to the state, I'm the King, I'm the state, everything belongs to me but still there is no private property. This happened many times in the history of the world before the idea of communism was born. And even communists had their kings. They just used other names to call them.

    35. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Moral aspects? Who fucking cares! Seriously. All that matters is what you call the "utilitarian aspect". I fail to see how anything else matters. Maybe it matters to you, but I don't care about what's fair or what's deserved, cause that's very arbitrary and subjective and it doesn't matter much anyway, I only care about the actual consequences. Actually, I even pirate software. Is it wrong? Who cares!! See?

      Ah and if you want to torrent my program you'll have to buy it first and seed it because I checked and it's nowhere to be found. Which would be welcome given that my sales are low these days and I'm running out of money.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    36. Re:What do you expect? by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      You could also get stuck with crap like the Apache web server that nobody uses, instead of the extremely popular and much loved and bug free IIS, built by our good friends in Redmond.

      For pay can be better than free, but it doesn't have to be.

    37. Re:What do you expect? by BobMcD · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is my personal opinion, and unless you are horribly broken it is likely that you agree. Surely we failed to communicate...

      What compensation do you feel would be warranted for the individual that came up with the concept that we should take shelter from the elements?

      To me this seems like a major part of my life. Perhaps you are the unusual form of Slashdot user that eschews all forms of shelter and uses an extremely rugged laptop that runs on rain water. I cannot say. However, my opinion is that this concept is significant enough for reward. I can only hope that this was recognized during his or her day, long long ago.

      On a related note, I'm genuinely disappointed that I spent this much time typing this out...

    38. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GIMP and Blender are hardly crap. They may not be on the same level as (some) professionally developed corresponding applications and that is due to the lack of well paid professional programmers who can dedicate themselves to the project completely, as you pointed out. Still, they continue to improve at their own rate and the amount of contributed work grows with their popularity. To say that we wouldn't have anything without people willing to pay for software is obvious hyperbole which detracts from an otherwise insightful post.

      I have no idea what things would look like in the absence of software copyrights and the current software business model, but there are enough people out there who are motivated by a a willingness to contribute and share when able that we would still have nice things even if they would take longer to reach the standards that we've come to expect.

    39. Re:What do you expect? by MaliciousSmurf · · Score: 1

      So you think the writers are doing the suing? (Hint: RIAA does not produce content. They distribute it.)

    40. Re:What do you expect? by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      well played, sir/madam.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    41. Re:What do you expect? by MaliciousSmurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... Wrong. Please read up on economics. His point is quite valid. No one "deserves" to get paid. The only reason you get paid is because the other party sees that as the only viable way to get what they want. (example: they could steal it from you. but then there might be repercussions when your village raids their village. so they buy it. or maybe you're not part of a village. so they steal it and kill you. except they can't get the goods from anyone else, so they pay you to continue producing what they want.) You say that your argument is logical. I put it to you that you don't know what logic is. It is a formalized way of expressing things that follows very strict rules. For instance, given that A > B and A B. That is logic. "creating a product" does not imply "you deserve payment". It has only taken on this meaning due to our culture and a type of cost-benefit analysis whereby we decided that civilization was better than anarchy.

    42. Re:What do you expect? by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      You don't like free things? Are you stupid or something?

    43. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, the "service" business model doesn't work for everything, for example it wouldn't work with my program for which no support is needed. And as for the "sitting back and getting money for the rest of your life" argument, well so what, it's not the only case where that happens. People get lots of money from doing much less. Are you actually asking for how long are you entitled to receive money from the work you did after you stopped doing anything to it? Sounds like what you're pondering to me! Is it fair to reap the fruits from something you did 20 years ago? What's fair?

      The elephant in the room here is that you all want to copy those immaterial works for free, and because of this you come up with bullshit moral justifications to get as much as you can for free. I pirate everything too, but I'm not an hypocrite, I don't try to disguise my not wanting to pay for things I can have for free as a moral war against injustice. You might think it conflicts with me selling software, but to me it doesn't, because there's no morals involved anywhere on either side of the equation. I pirate anything I want cause I need it/want it and I don't have the money for it and even if I did I'd rather not pay for what I can have for free, and on the other hand I need to make money, selling software is one way, and if my sales went down too low for a reason or another I'd look for job (which I'm actually in the process of doing, software sales are too irregular and make me just enough for a very modest living).

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    44. Re:What do you expect? by WNight · · Score: 1

      Copying doesn't make the original go away.

      That means piracy is the wrong term, because certainly the pirates didn't just duplicate your stuff and leave..

      That's also why your house analogy is worthless here. If you build a house and it is taken away you're out raw materials and a house. If you write a song and I sing it, you're out nothing.

      What, you can't engineer a cushy life writing music that way? Tough. It's how the world works - sounds can be copied - and I don't care to try to distort reality for you. Get a job that doesn't require the government to protect your secrets.

    45. Re:What do you expect? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      No one talked about Walt Disney making money off Mickey Mouse for a thousand years, right now we're talking about piracy and whether or not everything binary should be free.

      We're talking about why people who should know better (the company that's breaking copyright laws) is so willing to ignore the law. And further, why a large number of otherwise law-abiding people are willfully breaking those copyright laws.

      That's hardly off-topic. In fact, in my opinion it's the key to the issue.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    46. Re:What do you expect? by WNight · · Score: 1

      Do you think writers are overpaid? What do you base this on?

      I know they want to be.

      If they sold a chair they'd be getting compensated once despite people enjoying that chair for years.

      But they write something and they think they should be paid every time it's experienced...

    47. Re:What do you expect? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I have studied marketing and economics. I understand that need in a market determines overall value, but producing a product that people consume always produces some value. If there was zero value, the product would not be consumed.

      It is a simple logic statement.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    48. Re:What do you expect? by WNight · · Score: 1

      How often do you write a check to the family of whoever coined the phrase 'content creators'? And yet you shamelessly use a phrase they invented to grub for money. Similarly, the person who conflated murder on the high seas with copying a CD - you own them big.

      It's amazing how only some types of content count to you.

    49. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not pure Communism you are describing. It is more a transitional phase between Socialism and Communism. Pure Communism has no government what-so-ever; the country's that had Czars or Kings or whatever were not Communist nations, more like Dictatorships under the guise of Communism.

    50. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Or you could come up with a business plan that works, and doesn't rely on government enforcement.

      Actually it doesn't, it relies on my software just not being out there for everybody to use for free. If you want access to the full version of my program, you need to chuck $40 my way. What's "broken" about such a business model? There's nothing broken about a business model that makes all the money it should.

      It's not that they're easy to put together a certain way; but ownership of what amounts to one big number is hard to support.

      That's a bullshit question, because it deprives that "big number" of a context. See, it's like the number 42. In itself it's an utterly worthless number, but if you know what question it answers to then it's very worthy indeed. What if my program coincidentally shares the exact same binary sequence as a Britney Spears song? Then who owns that big number? It doesn't matter, because the fact that both would be made of the same thing is irrelevant. In other words, your "big number" is worthless if you don't know what it is for, if you don't know what file extension to give it. It's like that hexadecimal sequence from some DVD player that the creators claimed ownership to. It's silly to claim to own the number, but it's not silly to not want it disclosed, because when you know what this number is for it stops being a useless number like all the others. They don't want you to spread it around just like you don't want anyone to spread around your passwords or credit card number and codes, or SSID, which are all just numbers, and not even such big ones as that. 3025 is just a number like all the others, but if you know what door it opens or what credit card it is the code to then it stops being just a number. I personally find it silly to focus entirely on the technical nature of things and derive principles from them rather than focus on practical aspects.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    51. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      It only works for things with a very wide appeal, like web browsers, word processors or web servers. But if you want something that less than a million people would have a use for or that less than 10,000 would be willing to work for free for, then you're out of luck, if you need something that does the job you need to pay for it.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    52. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      As I just said in another post, free software gets only as good as how many people want the program in question and how many people are willing to work on it. That's why we have great free web browsers, servers and compilers, good free operating systems, passable 3D editors and not so great highly specific things that few people use.

      Without software copyrights the only ones who would really suffer are the ones who make the programs with a lot of seeds on BitTorrent. It would make things worse for them because "piracy" wouldn't be fought as arduously. But for niche developers like me, it wouldn't impact us too much because we control access to our product more easily, that is, if you want my program you need to pay me, there's no other way you can get it, and copyright law or not if ever I caught anyone distributing his copy I'd deactivate his license.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    53. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      We're talking about why people who should know better (the company that's breaking copyright laws) is so willing to ignore the law. And further, why a large number of otherwise law-abiding people are willfully breaking those copyright laws.

      Oh, oh, I know why, because money doesn't grow on trees and people think twice before spending money when they don't have to? All the moral and ethical bullshit and the legal consideration is just a smoke screen to hide that fact. Can't blame people for masquerading greed (which I'm not condemning) into something morally justified.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    54. Re:What do you expect? by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Technlogy is NOT "changing everything." Not many peope can write software, compelling stories, make good movies, video games, etc. As long as THAT doesn't change (and I don't see it changing anytime soon), copyright is just as valid today as it was 200 years ago.

      Someone is providing a benefit, which, while not physical property, does mean they deserve to be paid.

      Unless you don't want USEFUL software.

    55. Re:What do you expect? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot or a troll. Take your pick.

      First off, I've never received a dime for using the phrase content creator.

      Common sense, legislation, and a free market govern what constitutes actual original content. A common two-word phrase that is used ubiquitously is not the same as a movie, a CD or a video game.

      Poor analogies and hyperbole are only tools that you hope will obfuscate the issue. People who produce content that others digest deserve to get paid.

      If you can find one example of anything I've ever said in my life where I said only certain types of content should be paid for, or that certain groups of content creators don't deserve compensation, I will concede my hyprocisy to you. But given that I've never suggested that in my life, I'm calling you a liar.

      Anytime I've pirated personally, it was because I was young and didn't have the money to purchase the items I wanted. Never however did I claim that I was really entitled to do so, nor that the content creators didn't deserve to be paid. As I grew older, I was less and less comfortable with the practice. As I am both wiser and more wealthy, I believe in paying for what I consume.

      I am especially concerned that some of the content creators I valued as a child are no longer producing content today due to lack of financial success, I am even more aware that if you don't financially support things you enjoy, they may disappear.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    56. Re:What do you expect? by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 1
      > It's an old trick... but it just might work. Too bad there's not more kings and dukes in Oregon.

      Steve

      --
      Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
    57. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use your flexible head on this.

    58. Re:What do you expect? by fudoniten · · Score: 1

      If you want access to the full version of my program, you need to chuck $40 my way.

      Well, I can promise you, I don't use either version of your program.

      I'd be interested to hear you address the point brought up earlier: if houses could be cloned for free, people would start 'pirating' houses. Carpenters could start complaining how they ought to get paid, because they built that house. They should get paid any time a person sleeps in it (or any copy of it)! Would that be 'fair'? Should the government then stamp out housing piracy?

      Your business has changed. So has publishing, and media creation, and others. I feel for you, but I'm not going to support your efforts to fix your current business model in place. As far as I'm concerned, creation of software and support thereof is a valuable service, and it'll continue to be lucrative. Ownership of ('the rights to') said software, after it's finished, is as valuable as...well, you can even do the equation: (difficulty of making a copy + fear of punishment + guilt). That pool is drying up.

      The big number thing...if you don't own that, what exactly do you own? I kind of agree that a number can be many different thing...that just highlights the difficulty of claiming ownership of one. So, you'd rather claim ownership of the 'idea' or something...

      [it relies] on government enforcement.

      Actually it doesn't, it relies on my software just not being out there for everybody to use for free.

      See, exactly, and there's your problem. The cost of any person from making a copy is effectively $0. How can you fight that? With laws (i.e. government enforcement), or....?

    59. Re:What do you expect? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      like GIMP or Blender and would never again see anything like Photoshop or 3DS Max.

      That's a great comparision! A image manipulation program to painting and manipulation program and then a 3d modeling, skinning and rendering application to a modeling, animation, surface generator and rendering package.

      I see what you did there! You compared opensource utilities to none-equivalent proprietary ones to prove a point! I applaud your tact at discrediting Opensource.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    60. Re:What do you expect? by fudoniten · · Score: 1

      But the people who can write the software, stories, movies, music, and games might do well to find a model where they get paid in advance... You're right, they're performing a valuable service; but once that service is performed, there's no particular reason why they should continue to reap benefits off of it forever. Is there?

      Live performers have a harder time finding venues now than they did at the turn of the (previous) century. Movies had record audiences, percentage-wise, in the 1930's and 40's, and they've been declining ever since. Things changed; recorded music and VHS tapes (well, and other forms of entertainment) appeared, respectively. That's fine, the creators found new models. The models didn't involve smashing vinyl disks or herding people into theatres at gunpoint, even though they'd done something beneficial, and thus deserved to be paid. They adapted to their environment. Now it's time for them (and you, I presume) to do that again.

      Good luck with that!

    61. Re:What do you expect? by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      And what economy do you expect to have when there's no incentive to become the next Microsoft? I agree, our PTO is far too lenient with the idea of "nonobvious" when applied to software patents, but they're that way because we are not a post-industrial economy. We have better things to do than create more widgits, especially when so many have a college education (even though many can't make use of it (libarts degree), it still stretches the mind in a way public high school only did 50 years ago).

      This is why I don't care anymore when people complain about not being able to use Hulu and such outside the US-- tough, you don't have a). buying power or b). the products we have, so the advertisers dollars are going to waste. You want our IP? Buy it.

      Tougher IP laws == lower US trade deficit! :)

    62. Re:What do you expect? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      But for niche developers like me, it wouldn't impact us too much because we control access to our product more easily, that is, if you want my program you need to pay me, there's no other way you can get it, and copyright law or not if ever I caught anyone distributing his copy I'd deactivate his license.

      For niche developers, they often cannot hope to ever compete against any bigger products because no matter how good you make it, how close you make it to some larger proprietary suite, it will prove to be extremely difficult to generate any interest in your product.. Why?

      Take a look at the photo manipulation and paint software out there. Photoshop sits right at the top and so many other products that close in feature set and quality are not really that known or ever considered. If people can't afford photoshop, they won't look at the next second best offer, they won't even consider anything else. They'll just get Photoshop for free. This piracy hurts the software industry as because of the pirating it just reinforces people to stay with this single piece of software and other software never gets enough following to generate interest or get developers the resources needed (money) to continue working on the product and thus after a few years they die out.

      If you look closer at the photo manipulation and paint software, right now the only proprietary software that seems to have a chance are those funded by large corporations that can spend money on it as a side project (without making much of an income at all on it) or have been in the software industry for so long, they had a foot in the door before photoshop became king.

      Piracy has a negative impact on competition, doesn't matter if it's opensource or proprietary. Why would you go with opensource or other proprietary solutions that has a few features less when you can get something you are completely used to, trained to use in school and fully functional which everyone else uses for free (piracy)?

      The majority of people who own computers wouldn't go with anything else simply.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    63. Re:What do you expect? by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      guy1: "It's not that you don't "deserve" compensation or that it "should" be free, it's that simply that technology is changing everything."

      guy2: "There's a reason why things are like this, and that's because no one would bother writing professional-quality software if they didn't get paid enough for it."

      guy1: "It's ludicrous to say that you own a particular configuration of 1s and 0s"

      guy2: "That's the stupidest fucking argument on the topic I've ever heard."

      I think your both right to some extent. What happens when nano forges are common place and anyone can build a Mercedes Benz in their garage in one night from a pile of dirt? The same thing that is happening to 1's and 0's now.

      I've often wondered why the big software companies haven't moved more aggressively to software as a service models. I think one of the reasons, is that a certain amount of piracy is considered a good thing by software companies. Growing up with windows or mac os and photoshop leads to a designer expecting those items from their future employers, for example. Exposure and market penetration are always a good thing for any product. Companies often give their product away for free for that very reason.

      I think eventually we'll see software moving away from a boxed, tangible product model, and into the realm of software as a service. It will be a slow road, but we'll eventually need to be paying for services, and not a static set of 1's and 0's running locally. Most likely initially as a hybrid service, data local, 50% of the software remote.

      If the music industry had moved towards more of a cable company, streaming service, multiple packages, unlimited viewing, service oriented model, instead of still trying to sell discs, they would have been much better off by now.

      Sell me ease of use. Sell me being able to listen to any set of artists in my packaged deal, on my stereo, tv, computer, freely downloadable to any device, for 20-40 bucks a month. There would be customers for that. They simply have to move to a service model at some point.

      Why? Well what happens when someone can download or swap music collections in a split second? Say, the entire archives of Warner Brothers in a split second. It is mildly annoying now to wait for downloads, or to find what you want, but computer speed and search power isn't going to go backwards.

      The only reason we software/music/movies as a service wouldn't replace the tangible "in a box" product that we have now, is if the levels of piracy are acceptable as a means of market penetration and exposure. But I think that the levels are only going to go up over time, as searching, indexing, bandwidth, tor, etc.. become more powerful.

    64. Re:What do you expect? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Oh, oh, I know why, because money doesn't grow on trees

      But that does not explain why there have not been similar leaps in other crime rates besides copyright violation.

      I'm betting that most of the filesharers using bittorrent would never pick someone's pocket or shoplift or steal a credit card. Yet, in this one area of copyright violation, the willingness of otherwise law-abiding citizens goes way up.

      There's obviously something at work here besides "money doesn't grow on trees".

      But if you have more insights similar to the ones you have already expressed about why intellectual propertly laws are so widely ignored, I invite you to share them here. I'm sure there are a few readers here who can use a chuckle.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    65. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      For niche developers, they often cannot hope to ever compete against any bigger products because no matter how good you make it, how close you make it to some larger proprietary suite, it will prove to be extremely difficult to generate any interest in your product.. Why?

      If you're considering getting into something and don't see how you're going to have any sort of competitive edge then you're a dumbass and should leave entrepreneuring to people who have a clue what they're doing.

      But you're right that piracy devaluates the market.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    66. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Are you really saying that the GIMP and Photoshop cannot be compared? They're none(sic)-equivalent? lol... so why's everybody touting it as the alternative to Photoshop? Dumbass.

      And what comes closer in FOSS to comparing with 3DS Max but Blender? Nothing, it's as close as it gets? Just what I thought. Moron.

      I applaud your tact at discrediting Opensource.

      And I applaud your tact (lol?) at using words which meaning you don't seem to know quite well.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    67. Re:What do you expect? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You want our IP? Buy it.

      But that's just it: they don't have to buy it. And apparently there's a large segment of society that does not feel such an impulse to respect intellectual property laws. That's the point of my argument here.

      The only time we've seen such a large portion of society openly willing to break a law has been prohibition against alcohol and marijuana. And one of those laws fell and the other is weakened every day.

      That's why it's important to look at the reasons behind the public's unwillingness to respect intellectual property laws. There's more at work here than just the fact that suddenly otherwise law-abiding citizens have decided to become criminals. And those on the supply-side of content creation and patents (including me) better think about this situation very carefully because simply escalating penalties to scare people, setting up snitch 800 numbers and suing the pants off college kids and old ladies is not going to get the job done.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    68. Re:What do you expect? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Are you really saying that the GIMP and Photoshop cannot be compared?

      I'm saying they're designed for different purposes. GIMP is designed to be an image manipulation program, nothing else - Hence why it stands for GNU Image Manipulation Program.

      Photoshop is a multi-tool, designed for doing print work, image manipulation and paint software too.

      lol... so why's everybody touting it as the alternative to Photoshop?

      Not everyone. A lot of people who are in the know aren't stupid enough to go around screaming, "USE GIMP INSTEAD OF PHOTOSHOP TO MAKE YOUR PRINT WORK AND ARTISTIC ARTZ!". Infact, most of the time, what I see on Slashdot is people recommending using the GIMP over the Photoshop for doing image manipulation (which it does quite well), not because it is so superior, but because it's free, multiplatform and because the advanced super features that somewhat rely on Photoshop's painting abilities among other things aren't going to be that useful for the majority (thus not worth pirating, being locked into a certain OS or spending huge cash on).

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    69. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Your business has changed. So has publishing, and media creation, and others. I feel for you, but I'm not going to support your efforts to fix your current business model in place.

      My business only exists thanks to the Internet and the distribution it makes possible, not despite it. And despite your wishful thinking my business model works perfectly well. You guys like to pretend like things aren't the way they are with hypothetical bullshit. But back in the real world there's no such problems.

      Your question about "house piracy" is flawed in that what costs money in a house isn't the plans but actually building one, whereas in software making a copy is nothing, it's the design that needs being paid for. So a open source house could be free, but if you get an architect to make you a design well you gotta pay him.

      The cost of any person from making a copy is effectively $0. How can you fight that? With laws (i.e. government enforcement), or....?

      False premise, you can't make a copy of my program, because you have nowhere to get it from except by paying me.

      The big number thing...if you don't own that, what exactly do you own?

      Geez, here's a fucking hint : everytime I release a new version, that I change a single file in the ZIP or even that I change the compression settings, the "big number" changes. So guess what, the binary content is completely irrelevant. If you want to go somewhere towards relevancy, I own the source code, plus the website, plus my name's all over the fucking place. Babbling about "big numbers" I own is like saying that a bakery owns the donuts it sells you.

      See, exactly, and there's your problem.

      No, not really, I don't have a problem, because you can't copy my program. Even if you did, you wouldn't get all you get if you bought it, which is a link to download updates.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    70. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's just a matter of accounting. The writers could just charge more up-front and end up with the same amount earned at the end of the road.

      No, it's more than that. Charging up front means you decide on a value for your time, and once you collect that amount, the transaction is complete.

      Charging per copy means the value of your time is unknown. You could sell one copy, or you could sell a million; you did the same amount of work either way, but the amount you get paid can vary wildly. And since there's no upper bound on the (retroactive) value of your time, you'll never be satisfied with any amount.

      Think about it. When was the last time a well-known artist or author said "hey, I've made enough money on this work already, I'm going to release it into the public domain"?

      The issue is not with how long they're paid, it's with how much they're paid.

      The issue is with how they're paid, and how that payment scheme impacts the rest of us.

      If writers collected payment up front, and moved on once they'd done their work and gotten paid as agreed, there'd be no need for infringement lawsuits, no royalties or licensing restrictions. That would open the door to free production of derivative works and allow many more people to enjoy the completed work.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    71. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right, but what comes closer to replacing Photoshop than GIMP? Nothing? So, if it wasn't for Photoshop you'd still be stuck with crap like GIMP that's useless for "print work and painting". Thanks for helping me prove my point.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    72. Re:What do you expect? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      As a long time user of Photoshop (13 years now?) I will boldy pop into this thread and inform you GIMP is like Photoshop from ~10 years ago minus easily obtained plugins. Going further, the CS4 suite has zero threat of losing market share to open source alternatives in the professional realm.

      Blender, on the other hand, is quite useful for modelling in such an environment. It doesn't hold a flame to Maya, but there is much less of a rift than GIMP vs Photoshop.

    73. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      If everything comes down to just a bunch of 1s and 0s, then why don't you just create them as you need them?

      For the same reason I don't cut my own hair: the barber is better at cutting hair than I am.

      Oh, what's that? Creating what you want is non-trivial and the only way to create that is to do it the way it's currently done, which costs money?

      Yes, which is why I pay a barber to cut my hair instead of demanding that he do it for free. But of course, I only pay the barber when I get my hair cut, not every time I comb it!

      Cutting hair is a service: he does it, I give him money, and then we both move on until the next time I need my hair cut.

      Programmers can use the very same model. Writing code is a service. Give a programmer money, he'll write code, and then you can both move on until you need another program written. There's absolutely nothing about software development that requires you to pay for a copy of a program instead of paying for the act of writing it.

      I'm a self employed software developer and make a living off a program I created all on my own, I create value with my work, you wouldn't know what that means.

      For what it's worth, I'm a professional developer as well. But my business model doesn't depend (directly or indirectly) on controlling the number of copies. My living comes from writing code, not making copies.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    74. Re:What do you expect? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, that was quite obviously said by someone using something called "sarcasm". You might want to look it up.

      As for why people should get software for free, that's simple: because the creator(s) wanted them to have it for free. That's why many people release their software under Free licenses. If you don't want to do that, that's fine too. But don't complain if your paycheck depends on your copyrighted software, and someone releases a work-alike program for free and your business goes down the toilet. Part of being in business is looking for places where people are willing to pay money for a product or service you provide. With some things, that's pretty easy, such as if you specialize in a skill that not many people have, but lots of people need. With other things, it's idiotic: no one is going to pay you for bottled breathable air, for instance, since it exists all around us for free. So if you want to make money on software, find something that no one is going to bother making a free version of, or be like many OSS developers: go to work for a large company that is happy to pay them to work on FOSS software which is then released for free.

    75. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Obviously the moral threshold for "committing copyright infringement" is countless orders of magnitude lower than for robbing other people. You could have figured that out on your own if you weren't such a dumbass.

      There's obviously something at work here besides "money doesn't grow on trees".

      Besides in your wishes? Nope, just a money-saving "crime" that ranks much lower in amorality than spitting your gum on the curb. No one gives a crap about copyright laws besides a handful of basement armchair revolutionaries like you. If you think most people who pirate even ever gave as much as a half-assed thought about the whole issue of copyright and the morality of infringement you're giving them way too much credit.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    76. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Actually it doesn't [rely on government enforcement], it relies on my software just not being out there for everybody to use for free. If you want access to the full version of my program, you need to chuck $40 my way.

      Well, no, they don't. They can get the full version much cheaper from anyone who already has a copy (or a crack/keygen, depending on what protection measures you've used).

      If you expect to be the sole provider of copies, then you do need to rely on government enforcement.

      They don't want you to spread it around just like you don't want anyone to spread around your passwords or credit card number and codes, or SSID, which are all just numbers, and not even such big ones as that.

      The danger in spreading around passwords, credit card numbers, social security numbers, etc. comes from what those numbers can be used for. If I could be guaranteed that no one else would use my CC# to make fraudulent charges, I'd have no reason to care who had that number.

      So, what's the danger in spreading around the number that represents a program or a song? The danger that someone might feed it into their own computer and run the program, or feed it into their own MP3 player and hear the song? Those don't affect you in any way; you'll probably never even be aware of them.

      To put it bluntly, it's none of your business what numbers someone else feeds into their own equipment. It is my business what charges someone makes on my account, because I'm going to have to pay for them, or at least spend my time getting them removed. That's the difference.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    77. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Information, yes; a newly-created something-or-other (script, novel, song, etc) not so much. Sure, all the words and everything were already there, but the act of creativity needed to put them together in a new and different way... that's something worth being compensated for if/when someone(s) find it worthwhile.

      Why are you treating the "act of creativity" differently from any other act that people get paid for?

      Do mechanics go around fixing cars for free, expecting to be compensated "if/when someone(s) find it worthwhile"? Do barbers give out free haircuts hoping to be paid later? Do accountants calculate everyone's taxes, unsolicited, and then demand to be paid when those tax forms are filed?

      Of course not. If you perform a valuable service, the time to get paid is at the time when you perform the service -- not at some undefined future time, possibly years later, when someone derives a benefit from your service.

      Also, other people who perform valuable acts calculate a finite value for their time and expect to be paid that amount, no more and no less. The price of fixing your car doesn't depend on how many miles you drive later that week; it depends on how much time the mechanic spends working (and how expensive the parts are).

      If you want to go into business performing the valuable act of writing, then what you ought to do is come up with a value for your time, find buyers who are willing to give you that amount of money, and then release the completed work into the public domain. After you've been compensated, it's none of your business how many people make copies or derivative works.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    78. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Technlogy is NOT "changing everything." Not many peope can write software, compelling stories, make good movies, video games, etc. As long as THAT doesn't change (and I don't see it changing anytime soon), copyright is just as valid today as it was 200 years ago.

      No... you're conflating copyright, a government-granted monopoly on making copies and derivative works, with the ability of creative people to make money. What you should have said is "as long as THAT doesn't change (and I don't see it changing anytime soon), people will still be able to earn a living by creating this stuff."

      But technology is still undermining the validity of copyright. Copyright is an artifact of a relatively brief era in which it was feasible for a small number of wealthy entities to mass-produce copies, but infeasible for the masses to do the same. That era is now fading. You can't enforce copyright against billions of people in their own homes the way you can enforce it against a relative handful of publishers and factory owners.

      Someone is providing a benefit, which, while not physical property, does mean they deserve to be paid.

      Yes, they absolutely deserve to be paid for their work, just like anyone else who provides a valuable service. But that doesn't mean they deserve to be paid per copy, or paid for years and years long after they did the work. No one is forcing them to do any work without getting paid for it; if they aren't selling as many copies as they'd like, then maybe selling copies is a bad business model and they should come up with a better way to get paid for their work.

      Everyone else who provides a valuable service manages to do it without a government-granted monopoly, so why can't writers, programmers, filmmakers, and musicians?

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    79. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you build a nice house, many people will want to enter it. There will be demand in which the house will go to the highest bidder.

      Now take the houses in my neighborhood. They are half-done rehabs. Sure, they work as a "house" but there is no demand for a half finished boarded up house in the ghetto. This induces people to "steal" the house by squatting in it. They "get it for free" if you will.

      Why? Because it is an inferior product. Create a good product and there will always be demand.

    80. Re:What do you expect? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right, but what comes closer to replacing Photoshop than GIMP?

      I would say the opensource Krita, honestly. Krita is designed to be a image manipulation tool, printing (hence the CMYK support) and paint tool.

      So, if it wasn't for Photoshop you'd still be stuck with crap like GIMP that's useless for "print work and painting".

      Nope. I will admit though that when it comes to image manipulation, I have a tendency to use GIMP over Krita for it's advanced selection tools that Photoshop doesn't even have.

      Thanks for helping me prove my point.

      What point?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    81. Re:What do you expect? by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      Can't there be room for both models?

      Let's leave the "chair building" analogy behind and look at some other stuff. A chair is too little effort compared to writing a book or a script.

      Some builders get an order for a house and build it to order. Others build it speculatively - they have a good idea what they'll be able to sell it for once it's done, but they don't really know, and they get what the market will bear when they do finish it and sell it.

      Some salespeople are paid an hourly rate. Whether they sell something or not, they get the same amount. Others don't get paid anything if they don't sell, but get a commission on it. Depending on what they're selling, that salesperson may have been working on the sale for months before it happens.

      Why should creative people only be able to sell "to order" instead of writing something, putting it out there, and seeing what the market will bear? Why shouldn't a blockbuster book or movie be a windfall for its creator?

      I'm sure some writers think that they should get $5 every time someone reads their book, whether they read it at the library, bought a paper copy, or downloaded a copy.

      My guess is that most of them are probably perfectly happy with the "paper copy model" - every copy that leaves the manufacturer (or really the retailer) gets them some money.

      That breaks down in the eBook world, though, when there's no barrier to manufacture and anyone can manufacture a perfect copy. No barrier except DRM, and their readers mostly don't like DRM.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    82. Re:What do you expect? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      But the people who can write the software, stories, movies, music, and games might do well to find a model where they get paid in advance... You're right, they're performing a valuable service; but once that service is performed, there's no particular reason why they should continue to reap benefits off of it forever. Is there?

      Yes, because we've been down that road. It means the works will largely end up in the control of one person. The purpose of copyright isn't just to reward creative people, its to encourage common culture. Imaigine if something like 1984 was funded by a single person. It may never have gotten the chance to influnce our culture.

      As I said, if YOU don't want useful software, then continue with your thinking. But I for one am glad that someone else is writing an OS for me at an affordable price.

    83. Re:What do you expect? by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      Your philosophy only works for "work for hire." Much creative work is not work for hire.

      If I write a piece of software and try to sell it to the world off my own little web site, who, exactly, am I charging up front?

      If I write the great American novel, working on Saturdays for two years, then find a publisher who's willing to publish it but not to pay me except based on sales, why shouldn't I be paid per copy sold?

      Take it back a level; suppose we're talking about a script writer on a movie. Suppose the writer gets paid by the studio a fixed amount, with no percent on net. That doesn't mean it's ethical to make and distribute free copies of that movie; the studio has money invested in it and has a reasonable right to a return on that money.

      If the studio can't make money off their movies, they will stop making movies and invest their money elsewhere instead. In that world, the only movies that will be made are the crappy little "l love making movies" movies that show up on You Tube. If you get lucky, occasionally you'll get a real gem like "Doctor Horrible's Sing-Along Blog" made by people who really love what they're doing. But mostly you'll get dreck like this.

      Just because it's a big company you're being an ass to instead of an individual doesn't make it right. I'm not going to say "stealing" because that's a loaded word and there's a lot of debate around here about whether a copyright violation is a theft. But I do think you're being an ass if you copy someone's creative output without their permission.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    84. Re:What do you expect? by Draek · · Score: 1

      If I build a house, I get paid by the people who use it.

      No you don't, you get paid by the people who decide to buy it. Whether they decide to live in it, demolish it to the ground or simply keep it as an 'investment' is irrelevant, after that sale you hold no control over it whatsoever and if, for some reason, you don't like the number of people living there and think you deserve to get more, you're fucked.

      If I put the same effort into, say, a film script, that might take anywhere from 6 weeks to a year to write, why should people get it for free?

      If I put the same effort into, say, getting a nice, unique haircut, why should people get to look at it for free? capitalism doesn't reward effort, only need. And once the script is done, your work isn't needed anymore so what you should be doing is pitching your script-writing capabilities to a studio that may profit from it, not artificially trying to restrict the supply of a commodity so you can control it.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    85. Re:What do you expect? by Draek · · Score: 1

      There's a reason why things are like this, and that's because no one would bother writing professional-quality software if they didn't get paid enough for it.

      Wrong. Fewer perhaps, but "no one" is patently false.

      Think all you want about how immaterial things should be free, but if all information somehow had to be free then you wouldn't have anymore professional software around, you'd be stuck with crap like GIMP or Blender and would never again see anything like Photoshop or 3DS Max.

      Next time, try picking your examples better. Blender originated as a commercial, closed-source application and was only made open-source later.

      There's thousands of man-hours of work that go into each such commercial program, man-hours from highly qualified and well-paid people. Someone has to pay for that work, cause if no one does then these people won't touch that ever again and look for a real job that pays.

      There are other ways to finance software development other than artificial scarcity. If you were truly a part of the field you'd know it already, as most of the world's software doesn't rely on it.

      By the way, not believing in private property is communism. It's like, someone painstakingly creates something and then some wanker like you comes up and goes "this is now property of the people, thank you".

      And government-granted monopolies are socialism. Your point, if you had any?

      TL;DR you sound like a broke ass basement dweller who wants all his porn, games, movies and music for free cause has no money, and who'd never create anything worth a dime, so it's easy for you to whine and demand that everything is offered to you for free.

      Funny, you sound like a broke ass basement dweller who wants to get paid by every one of his farts cause he has no money, and who'd never do honest work so its easy for you to whine and demand that everyone pay tributes to you for the priviledge of looking upon the crap you did years ago.

      I'm a self employed software developer and make a living off a program I created all on my own, I create value with my work, you wouldn't know what that means.

      Mustn't be a very good living, otherwise you wouldn't be crying off here, would you? get a real job, learn how the world truly works, then come back here and repeat your little rant if you can.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    86. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said.

    87. Re:What do you expect? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Actually Communists distinguish personal property (what a person owns and uses directly) and private ownership of the means of production (that a person uses to take control of the fruits of others' labor).

      Socialist countries (what you, Americans, call "Communist countries") had banned the latter but not the former. People could own anything from thumbtacks to livestock and shares in the buildings under construction, however only government could own a factory, road, bank, etc. Considering that this made government bureaucrats better at management than most of managers and executives I have ever seen in US, I don't see any problem with this.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    88. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laws stem from a common set of ethics.

      IP is protected because we commonly believe it is ethical to protect creators from leeches.

      You disagree with this ethic. Leech.

    89. Re:What do you expect? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's room for many models. It is the entertainment industry that is trying to force the economics of content into the same model as used for physical goods such as chairs.

      Actually, they don't stop there, they want it both ways. Treated as information when it impacts their bottom line, treated like physical property when it's your bottom line. They sell downloads, however grudgingly, reaping huge savings in distribution costs from doing all the copying and delivery electronically. Then they try to insist their customers not do what they do by threatening legal action if people don't treat downloads as if they were physical objects, pushing idiotic DRM schemes, making insultingly ludicrous analogies, and when all else fails making disgusting appeals to our sympathies with the "starving artists" and "support capitalism" baloney. Those are like listening to Madoff give a speech on the virtues of honesty and financial probity.

      I really do think copyright has to go. If we as a society want to encourage art beyond what can already be done with the incredible advances in technology, there are other ways than hogtying ourselves with these antiquated, nonsensical laws. What I mean is that before the 20th century, we lacked the means to record performers. Copyright was useless to them. They had to earn all their income from live performances. And those were to audiences of a few hundreds at most, with only clever amphitheater design to make them audible to their listeners. Performing to a different 1000 every weekday for 10 years would get a 19th century performer heard by fewer than 3 million people. Today, not only can we record performances, we can do all kinds of studio work to make recordings better than live could ever be. And we can broadcast performances all over the world, and amplify sound so tens of thousands of people can enjoy a single live concert. Yet the industry hinders the engineering wizards who made that and them possible, endlessly fighting every technological advance. Take away this weapon called "copyright" that they've been gouging and smashing lives with, and set down a few more ground rules to stop their abuse of musicians.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    90. Re:What do you expect? by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      Obviously the moral threshold for "committing copyright infringement" is countless orders of magnitude lower than for robbing other people.

      I lol'd

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    91. Re:What do you expect? by d34dluk3 · · Score: 1

      Think all you want about how immaterial things should be free, but if all information somehow had to be free then you wouldn't have anymore professional software around, you'd be stuck with crap like GIMP or Blender and would never again see anything like Photoshop or 3DS Max.

      Last I checked, AVG and Avast were better than Norton and MacAfee. As in way way way better.

    92. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except copyright is not meant for recouping the cost of distributing the work. The market will take care of that (if someone other than the creator can distribute it cheaply, the creator is free to do the same). Copyright is meant for recouping the cost of producing the work to begin with.

    93. Re:What do you expect? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Ahahaha, such self-righteous indignity from a hypocrite. No wonder you are so spiteful, nobody is buying your shit software. Sorry dude. For someone bragging about creating shit you're too small time to even matter and you're apparently becoming increasingly irrelevant.

      You don't care about fair or deserved or the moral/justified aspects yet you're willing to whine and whine about how you "deserve" money and how it's all communism so on so forth? Yeah, OK buddy.

    94. Re:What do you expect? by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Obviously said by someone who's never put a lot of work into a program, video, script, or anything else that requires creative work, then wondered why he wasn't making money on it.

      Whether someone makes money from their work or not is not anyone else's problem. Lots of people put money into things that fail. Its called free market capitalism. Should every small business that fails get a subsidy from society?

    95. Re:What do you expect? by the_womble · · Score: 1

      You are making lots of invalid assumptions. One is that the only way to make money off software.

      Also, remember that open source software is generally as good as or better than proprietary alternatives, despite having a much smaller user-base. I am sure you can find examples where the proprietary alternative is better, but if the open source version had the same user base (and the extra funding that implies) how good would it be then?

      Lots of people including myself, do not find the proprietary alternatives for what we do better: in fact they are usually worse (except Excel, and the extra features are ones I would use rarely, it at all these days).

      Incidentally, Blender seems to have a lot of professional users for "crap".

      I'm a self employed software developer and make a living off a program I created all on my own

      So your argument comes down to: I need government created monopolies for my business to be profitable, so they are a good thing. From your point of view yes, but some of us prefer a free market economy.

      Incidentally I am in favour of sensible copyright (say 20 years, and no protection for encryption, and no criminal offenses), but not for software.

    96. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is also this
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-property_system

    97. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      self-righteous indignity |...] hypocrite [...] your shit software [...] irrelevant

      I smell butthurt. Did somebody get.. troll'd?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    98. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Like I said in countless other posts, free software is only better when the appeal is so broad you have thousands of people who'd want to work on the project. Doesn't work so well on more niche sectors.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    99. Re:What do you expect? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Obviously the moral threshold for "committing copyright infringement" is countless orders of magnitude lower than for robbing other people. You could have figured that out on your own if you weren't such a dumbass.

      And yet, we are told that breaking copyright laws is exactly that: "theft".

      If breaking copyright laws is no greater crime than spitting on the sidewalk, then why are we discussing it as a worldwide problem that threatens the free enterprise system?

      You yourself conflated copyright infringement with Communism, and now you say it's barely an issue?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    100. Re:What do you expect? by Restil · · Score: 1

      If writers collected payment up front, and moved on once they'd done their work and gotten paid as agreed, there'd be no need for infringement lawsuits, no royalties or licensing restrictions.

      MANY writers (and other artists) would be happy with that arrangement. In fact, a lot of them work under that arrangement now. Ever hear of a book contract? It's a risk/reward ratio. You can either choose to take a small compensation for your work, but know for a fact you'll get it, no matter how well it sells, or you can opt for royalty payments, but may have to wait years to get the full value out of the work.

      Sometimes, the pay up front model just isn't realistic. SOMEONE has to fork over the large sum of money for the artist to get paid. Either you have to collect all the orders up front, or someone has to gamble on the outcome and hope to recoup the cost later. In that event, we're right back to royalty payments, instead now it's not an artist getting paid. It's not someone who has both an emotional AND financial attachment to the project. It's going to be a soulless corporation, the only goal of which is to maximize the potential profit. And there's nothing wrong with that, but it doesn't really help the problem for which you implied that up-front payments were supposed to solve. The corporation can very well carry on the infringement lawsuits itself.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    101. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      you "deserve" money

      Good point! That means you wouldn't even have Blender if it wasn't for commercial software!!

      There are other ways to finance software development other than artificial scarcity. If you were truly a part of the field you'd know it already, as most of the world's software doesn't rely on it.

      Oh no, you hit me with a "you don't agree with my view so you're not a real real developer". And as for your "artificial scarcity" thing, that's a stupid point, because once again you're focusing on what doesn't matter, the nearly costless distribution, and not on what costs money, developer work. In other words, people don't pay for the copy, people pay for the service of me developing it. I know it must be hard to get that to replace your dumbass view that "hurr durr copying is the only part that gives something value".

      And government-granted monopolies are socialism.

      What god damn monopoly? Do you even know what a monopoly is? No ones granting me any monopoly, so what the fuck are you babbling about?

      Funny, you sound like a broke ass basement dweller who wants to get paid by every one of his farts cause he has no money, and who'd never do honest work so its easy for you to whine and demand that everyone pay tributes to you for the priviledge of looking upon the crap you did years ago.

      Oh noes, you trolled me by comparing my hard low-paying work to farts! And no, I live in Europe, we don't live in basements here. Yeah, nice try.

      Mustn't be a very good living, otherwise you wouldn't be trolling off here, would you?

      FYP. There's little funnier to do on Slashdot than trolling suckers like you into trying to explain why everything should be free. Which is where you disappoint me, nowhere in your post are you arguing for why you think things should be the way you'd like them to be, two thirds of it is personal insults on me and my work which you know nothing about in a pathetic effort to counter-troll me, the rest is in essence quoting random bits I said and saying "no ur wrong".

      get a real job, learn how the world truly works, then come back here and repeat your little rant if you can.

      Try starting your own software company with no funds, find out for yourself how much it takes to make even a modest living out of it, see how well the sales keep up when you stop working on the program and stop promoting it (hint: nothing sells itself), then come back here and repeat your trolling attempts once you have a clue what you're talking about.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    102. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Mmmh, misquoted the first one, it's supposed to quote the thing about GIMP starting off as a commercial program. Clipboard usage fail.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    103. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Well, no, they don't. They can get the full version much cheaper from anyone who already has a copy (or a crack/keygen, depending on what protection measures you've used).

      No, what would make you think that? No one would share their copy because then I'd deactivate their license, but also because most people are honest and don't try to screw me and know that if I don't get my money I'll stop working on the damn thing. Again, that's wishful thinking from you that you could get my program for free. Lots of niche programs are nowhere to be found on warez sites. So you see, I still don't rely on government enforcement, mostly when dealing with people from countries in which there's no such enforcement, I only rely on technological measures and social mechanics.

      The danger in spreading around passwords, credit card numbers, social security numbers, etc. comes from what those numbers can be used for. If I could be guaranteed that no one else would use my CC# to make fraudulent charges, I'd have no reason to care who had that number.

      Exactly, and if you make software then people distributing binaries or serials impacts you in that you'll make less money, so in the same way it'll cost you money. Don't you see how this is the same thing?

      The danger that someone might feed it into their own computer and run the program, or feed it into their own MP3 player and hear the song?

      No, you fucking dumbass, cause you're on the criminal side, so obviously the downsides aren't on your side.

      To put it bluntly, it's none of your business what numbers someone else feeds into their own equipment.

      Well if you want to feed my numbers into your equipment you're gonna have to put some numbers preceded with a dollar sign into my bank account. What's hard to understand about that?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    104. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Yes, which is why I pay a barber to cut my hair instead of demanding that he do it for free. But of course, I only pay the barber when I get my hair cut, not every time I comb it!

      When you buy my software it's more like you get a home barber machine.

      Programmers can use the very same model. Writing code is a service. Give a programmer money, he'll write code, and then you can both move on until you need another program written. There's absolutely nothing about software development that requires you to pay for a copy of a program instead of paying for the act of writing it.

      That's the stupidest fucking suggestion I've heard in this entire thread. That's as if you told musicians, don't get paid for your albums, get paid to make your albums in the first place. You know, like Mozart got paid for pieces, and that's how he was always broke besides being a fucking genius? I don't even know how that's supposed to work for software, are you really suggesting that someone with deep pockets pays for Adobe to develop Photoshop from scratch? That's stupid as fuck.

      But my business model doesn't depend (directly or indirectly) on controlling the number of copies. My living comes from writing code, not making copies.

      Yeah, because you have the convenience of having a boss (or a client who commissioned your work, which is the same thing as a boss except with less direct management) who writes your cheques whose concern it is to find a way to make money out of what you do. I'm the boss, I'm the one who's striving to maximise profits out of my market. And giving my product away for free isn't exactly the way to do it, but you wouldn't know, I'm the entrepreneur here, you're just a code monkey with no need for any sort of business sense.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    105. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I was pointed out that Blender was originally a commercial program, so that weakens my comparison I guess.

      And yeah, no open source alternative comes close to threatening Adobe Photoshop, no matter how free they are, but that won't stop any FOSS zealot here from arguing that everything should be free to make the world a better place in every aspect.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    106. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      You yourself conflated copyright infringement with Communism, and now you say it's barely an issue?

      No, that's just wishful reading, I never said that copyright infringement was like Communism, I said that demanding that everything (in digital works) should be available for free is communism. As in, some people out here believe that both Adobe and I should give the products of our labour for free and not make any money of that "artificial scarcity" which is not giving everything we do away.

      And yet, we are told that breaking copyright laws is exactly that: "theft".

      You tell me, I'm not telling you that.

      If breaking copyright laws is no greater crime than spitting on the sidewalk

      Again, learn to read what's actually written, I talked about moral threshold for people who might consider committing that, nowhere did I mention any consideration for the actual consequences of either of those things. I'm just explaining how it works for people on all sides of the issue, I'm not talking of morals, ethics, principles, ideologies (although I did compare the FOSS zealot ideology with communism, which is to give a perspective on actually what some of the people involved want), I'm just trying to explain you dumbasses why your ideology of "give us everything for free" cannot work as it's rarely a viable business model when you're in the business of making software, which most of you seem to want to ignore.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    107. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see two problems with that model being adopted on a wide scale. Firstly, if you want to be paid a wage to live off of, your client has to pay an enormous sum for the product (relative to today's price). Let's say you're really good and can bang out a decent piece of software in one week. Now, assuming you're getting paid $30,000/yr (which is rather pathetic for someone who can write a full product in one week - if we were all paid that little, it wouldn't even be worth going to college when we could be barbers or teachers), that's still $625. That's a hell of a lot for a product that only took one man one week to write (ie, either complex but buggy or simple and therefore already out there). Copies amortise this cost, and since copying is becoming EASIER, charging more for the product does not make any sense (they could sell copies of your work to recoup their money, but that's exactly the system we have now).

      Secondly, once the software is written, it's written. Now, any moderately intelligent person will either trade or give away (ie, "buy goodwill") in order to get other people's software, thus saving themselves trouble in the future. Soon, there's enough free software out there to fill every need, and everyone's out of a job (instead of our current situation where we have scored of competing software projects and therefore more jobs than are strictly required). And before some smartypants points out "but there IS free software out there, and yet programmers can still find jobs!", I'd point out that this is because most F/OSS coders cannot dedicate the amount of time or resources required to make a project up to the standard people have come to expect from software (including ancillary services - marketing, artwork/UI, market research, full-time technical support, etc) - so commercial software fills these needs.

      Now, I'm sure this model works for you, but I'm also sure that it's because you've discovered a niche for people who need CUSTOM software and are willing to pay for it (most people don't need custom software in the same way most people don't need tailored clothing or custom-built houses). I'm incredibly dubious in this model's ability to scale to the whole industry.

    108. Re:What do you expect? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Think all you want about how immaterial things should be free, but if all information somehow had to be free then you wouldn't have anymore professional software around, you'd be stuck with crap like GIMP or Blender and would never again see anything like Photoshop or 3DS Max.

      And guess what: that would be just fine with me. I can't afford Photoshop or 3DS Max as is. The people who can, and need such tools, could simply pool their resources and pay programmers to make them - a bit like happened with Apache, PostgreSQL, Linux etc. In fact, I'd imagine that both Gimp and Blender would receive a lot more development resources, making them better faster.

      The thing is, "professional software" is simply software made by people who are getting paid. You don't need copyright to have paid programmers; you simply need someone who needs software and has money.

      By the way, not believing in private property is communism.

      The current scareword is terrorism. And the issue under consideration is not private property, or any property for that matter, but restricting people's ability to communicate certain data to other people in order to give financial benefit to unrelated people, called "copyright holders".

      It's like, someone painstakingly creates something and then some wanker like you comes up and goes "this is now property of the people, thank you".

      It's more like some wanker comes and says I can't tell this neat thing I heard to anyone else and I go "fuck you".

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    109. Re:What do you expect? by selven · · Score: 1

      Think about it. When was the last time a well-known artist or author said "hey, I've made enough money on this work already, I'm going to release it into the public domain"?

      John Carmack?

    110. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why they dontlet you download it for free ?
      Easy it perception of value. The pointy haired boss buying the software probably wouldnt have looked at it twice if it was free. Now the boss found a product, negotiated and feels he has a great deal.

      And of course this doesnt work for everyone. First you need to have a product that actually requires support.
      But there is a great difference between software patents and copyright.
      If you have written something, it is yours, and i dont see why other should be able to use it for free if you don't want them to.
      But if someone else came up with a similar idea, and written his own program, i also think he should be able to use it as he wishes.

    111. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said: I'm not saying people are owed or deserve that software for free,

      Then you said: copying software is not unethical because information is not [i]materially scarce[/i]

      Since the second is a form of the first, you're clearly a liar and an idiot.

    112. Re:What do you expect? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If I build a house, I don't get paid by the people who use it. I get paid by the people who buy it from me. Once. They're free to rent it out to a tenant

      Insn't that the same as when musicians (etc) sell their rights to a publisher? Somehow that's considered wrong round these parts.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    113. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, the pay up front model just isn't realistic. SOMEONE has to fork over the large sum of money for the artist to get paid. Either you have to collect all the orders up front, or someone has to gamble on the outcome and hope to recoup the cost later.

      So collect all the "orders" up front. The same internet that makes it possible to share a million copies of a song, one peer-to-peer transfer at a time, also makes it possible to collect a large sum of money, one small payment at a time. The model has already been demonstrated for political contributions.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    114. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      No one would share their copy because then I'd deactivate their license, but also because most people are honest and don't try to screw me and know that if I don't get my money I'll stop working on the damn thing.

      If that were true, there would be no piracy. But there is piracy, because DRM doesn't work perfectly ("deactivate their license"?) and people don't always care about funding future development when they already have what they need.

      Again, that's wishful thinking from you that you could get my program for free. Lots of niche programs are nowhere to be found on warez sites.

      If there were sufficient demand for your program, it would be on the warez sites. Relying on your program's unpopularity is an interesting and probably effective approach, but it's not for everyone.

      Exactly, and if you make software then people distributing binaries or serials impacts you in that you'll make less money, so in the same way it'll cost you money. Don't you see how this is the same thing?

      No, it isn't. Losing money is not the same as not-gaining money.

      If you make a fraudulent charge to my credit card, that costs me money (-$50). The alternative is that you don't make a fraudulent charge, which costs me nothing ($0).

      If I pirate your program, that costs you nothing but you gain nothing ($0). The likely alternative is that I don't pirate your program, in which case you still gain nothing ($0). See the difference?

      No, you fucking dumbass, cause you're on the criminal side, so obviously the downsides aren't on your side.

      Then where are they? What is the "downside" of someone running your program without having paid for it? Don't assume they would have given you money otherwise: most P2P users have far more content than they'd be willing or able to obtain if they had to pay for it.

      Well if you want to feed my numbers into your equipment you're gonna have to put some numbers preceded with a dollar sign into my bank account. What's hard to understand about that?

      It's not hard to understand, it's just naive and unrealistic. That may be what an unenforceable law says, or what your hubris has led you to believe your DRM system is capable of, but it's not how the world works.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    115. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Firstly, if you want to be paid a wage to live off of, your client has to pay an enormous sum for the product (relative to today's price). Let's say you're really good and can bang out a decent piece of software in one week. Now, assuming you're getting paid $30,000/yr [...], that's still $625. That's a hell of a lot for a product that only took one man one week to write (ie, either complex but buggy or simple and therefore already out there). Copies amortise this cost [...]

      Yes, that's a large amount of money, but no, selling copies isn't what amortize it today. Having more than one client is what makes software affordable today, and that wouldn't have to change if you charged up front. If you find ten people who want you to write this program, they'll only have to pay $62.50 each.

      Now, any moderately intelligent person will either trade or give away (ie, "buy goodwill") in order to get other people's software, thus saving themselves trouble in the future. Soon, there's enough free software out there to fill every need, and everyone's out of a job [...]. And before some smartypants points out "but there IS free software out there, and yet programmers can still find jobs!", I'd point out that this is because most F/OSS coders cannot dedicate the amount of time or resources required to make a project up to the standard people have come to expect from software

      Uh...

      If I understand this correctly, you're suggesting that programmers asking for money up front will lead to a massive wave of free software rising up to fill every niche, crushing commercial software development.

      First, can I have some of what you're smoking?

      Second, even if this came to pass, why would it be a bad thing? You're suggesting that the world's demand for software would all be satisfied by volunteers. If people are actually willing to give their time away to write every desired program for free, why should we stop them? Why should we prefer a system where volunteers can't do that?

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    116. Re:What do you expect? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      When was the last time a well-known artist or author said "hey, I've made enough money on this work already, I'm going to release it into the public domain"?

      While I do agree with your argument, I am going to have to refute this one point.

      • Starseige Tribes
      • Quake III engine
    117. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      When you buy my software it's more like you get a home barber machine.

      No, a home barber machine would replace a barber. A copy of your software does not replace you.

      That's as if you told musicians, don't get paid for your albums, get paid to make your albums in the first place.

      Yes, exactly. People do get paid to write and perform music today, and most bands make more from performances than album sales anyway. Mozart didn't have a web site where fans could pay him directly; he didn't even have as many fans as many bands today.

      I don't even know how that's supposed to work for software, are you really suggesting that someone with deep pockets pays for Adobe to develop Photoshop from scratch?

      One individual with massive pockets? No. I'm suggesting that thousands of people pool their funds to pay for it.

      Yeah, because you have the convenience of having a boss (or a client who commissioned your work, which is the same thing as a boss except with less direct management) who writes your cheques whose concern it is to find a way to make money out of what you do.

      Incorrect. I wrote "directly or indirectly" for a reason: the business model does not depend on restricting the number of copies in existence. We don't sell software, we provide solutions, and the software exists to enable those solutions. The disc with the number burned onto it is useless without the uncopyable goods and services we provide.

      And giving my product away for free isn't exactly the way to do it, but you wouldn't know, I'm the entrepreneur here, you're just a code monkey with no need for any sort of business sense.

      Entrepreneurs know how to innovate. You're no entrepreneur, you're just another businessman who's so stuck in the past that he doesn't even know what his "product" really is.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    118. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Neither of those are public domain: the authors still assert the right to control how they're distributed. The Quake III engine (and only the engine) is GPL, or $10,000 for a non-GPL license, and as far as I can tell, Tribes is just plain old freeware.

      So while it's true that the authors have (at least partly) given up on making money from those works, they haven't really moved on.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    119. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      As in, some people out here believe that both Adobe and I should give the products of our labour for free and not make any money of that "artificial scarcity" which is not giving everything we do away.

      No one is saying that you or Adobe should not get paid for your labor. They're saying that you and Adobe should only get paid for your labor.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    120. Re:What do you expect? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      With politicians you know, more or less, what you're going to get. This lot hate $group and like $other_group, that lot are the other way round, and the other lot hate everybody.

      It just doesn't stretch to something like a movie. I'll pay to see a movie that I like, and I have some degree of confidence on my decision because I've seen reviews and clips. I can see those reviews and clips because - get this - it's already been made.

      But would I pay that money up front on spec? No, and neither would the vast majority of people. That's why you don't see the distributed patronage model except for a few obscure niches.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    121. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because we've been down that road. It means the works will largely end up in the control of one person.

      No, it doesn't. Today we have global communication and payment systems. You don't need to get all your funding from one person.

      You'll have a much easier time collecting $10 from a million people than collecting $10 million from one person, and of course that's what happens today anyway when tickets and copies are sold. You can still tap into that same demand if you treat your work as a service and get paid up front.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    122. Re:What do you expect? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The elephant in the room here is that profits for movies and music have been going up in recent years. In the last decade the number of films produced per year has doubled and movie studio's profits have never been higher. Music is doing very well too, now that they figured out kids want downloads and ringtones rather than CDs any more.

      There is no more opportunity for artists to get paid for their work than ever before. New markets are opening up too, such as the various App Stores and downloadable console games. You can now even self-publish your book in electronic format and people can read it on the train thanks to eBook readers.

      Furthermore, the idea that if people can get stuff for free the won't pay for it is ludicrous. You have been able to get free music on the radio (which you can tape), free movies on the TV (which you can tape) and free books at the library for 50+ years.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    123. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      With politicians you know, more or less, what you're going to get.

      But with political contributions, you have no idea what you're going to get. You don't know what the money will be used for, and you certainly don't get a refund if your candidate loses.

      Yet people are still willing to give millions of dollars to campaigns, $20 or $100 at a time. They're just as passionate about art and music, and there you can offer them something concrete.

      But would I pay that money up front on spec? No, and neither would the vast majority of people.

      Maybe you wouldn't, but most people would contribute (1) if the price were right, or (2) if the producer had a good reputation. I know I wouldn't hesitate if a band I enjoyed needed money to record their next album -- would you?

      That's why you don't see the distributed patronage model except for a few obscure niches.

      The reason you don't see the distributed patronage model is that copyright is more convenient for producers, as well as more exciting (just like playing blackjack is more exciting than buying bonds).

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    124. Re:What do you expect? by Random5 · · Score: 1

      Abolishing copyright is not the solution to that. That would just make it so they don't get paid AT ALL for what they produce. OK, maybe you could implement an honour system but that's very untested, and there are a lot of immoral people out there who will take the content, think it's fantastic and never pay for it. I happen to think that's immoral and should be (financially) punishable.

    125. Re:What do you expect? by Random5 · · Score: 1

      That depends on what the writer agrees to in contract, they could refuse to sell it without profit sharing (i.e. writer gets paid % of total profit) which you think might be an idea for a script you're selling for 500k! But then it could flop (as many films based on high value IP have, just look at all the sequel flops out there). So you can get guaranteed 500k, or get a fair bit less, 100k and a % of profits. You accept the 100k and % but the director sucks and the film doesn't break even. Whoops. Or you take the 500k and abandon 5% of profit sharing on a movie which makes 100million profit. Again, whoops. It's just a matter of good business decisions, as you see everywhere in the world.

    126. Re:What do you expect? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      That would just make it so they don't get paid AT ALL for what they produce.

      Radiohead, Trent Reznor and the developers of world of goo would beg to differ.

      there are a lot of immoral people out there who will take the content, think it's fantastic and never pay for it

      and how is that different from what happens under the current system? People pirate stuff whether or not there is a law against it. If you look at the sales for those examples i gave above, a fairly significant proportion of the consumers paid nothing or one penny. Yet the artists still raked in an amount of money they were more than happy with. The question is how many of the people who pay for music/games/movies at the moment do it because they want to pay the artist or simply because they fear punishment? It seems the fear of punishment plays little or no part in how well an artist does from sales of recordings of their work. If the law does nothing to help anyone and so much to hinder culture and destroys the lives of those it decides to make obscene examples of, what possible ethical, moral or practical reason is there for its existence? How much more agile and healthy would the ecomony of art be if there were no bureaucratic barriers to tie up billions of dollars in an "industry" of litigation that is little more than a self-financing toll gate?

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    127. Re:What do you expect? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. Today we have global communication and payment systems. You don't need to get all your funding from one person.

      If a well known and highly regarded author can't make this work for a simple book, what makes you think this would even come close to funding something like a Hollywood movie.

      You'll have a much easier time collecting $10 from a million people than collecting $10 million from one person, and of course that's what happens today anyway when tickets and copies are sold. You can still tap into that same demand if you treat your work as a service and get paid up front.

      You won't get a million people to pay for something that hasn't even been created. What happens when they don't like the final product? Will people get thier money back if they end up not liking it? How much say does each individual have in the making of the work? How do you get 10 million people to agree on direction? Or do you expect them to pay their $10 and shut up? You really think that would fly?

    128. Re:What do you expect? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Uh, no, and it appears you're trying to save face now. Amusing.

    129. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      If there were sufficient demand for your program, it would be on the warez sites. Relying on your program's unpopularity is an interesting and probably effective approach, but it's not for everyone.

      Well, I've had over 300 sales. That's not much, but so far it still didn't pirated, so even if I had one leak every 300 sales that probably wouldn't be any big deal.

      No, it isn't. Losing money is not the same as not-gaining money.

      It is when you're in business. Think about it.

      It's not hard to understand, it's just naive and unrealistic. That may be what an unenforceable law says, or what your hubris has led you to believe your DRM system is capable of, but it's not how the world works.

      That's how it effectively works for me, sorry if it goes against your wishful thinking. You couldn't get a free copy of my program if your life depended on it. The facts are on my side.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    130. Re:What do you expect? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between saying that people don't "deserve" money for software and the fact that people who may copy software aren't doing anything unethical.

      The second is not a form of the first.

    131. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      No, a home barber machine would replace a barber. A copy of your software does not replace you.

      I'm not a barber, dumbass, I'm the engineer who made the barber machine that replaces the barber.

      I'm suggesting that thousands of people pool their funds to pay for it.

      Fool, get the fuck out of your basement and get a clue of how things really work. No one's gonna give $300 to a company for them to eventually build them a program and two years later perhaps deliver. That's just a retarded thing to suggest. I mean seriously, how the fuck am I supposed to have a serious discussion with some dumbass who suggests some dumb crap like that that not even a fool would do.

      Entrepreneurs know how to innovate. You're no entrepreneur, you're just another businessman who's so stuck in the past that he doesn't even know what his "product" really is.

      What the hell are you babbling about, what I did is pure innovation. That's so innovative, I measure my performance by minds blown an hour. It's just a case of not doing things your way being the wrong way. Time to put up or shut up : my program is an innovative kind of program worth $40 that is quite technical but very unique and powerful in what it does. All the revenue made from it comes from letting people try a demo version of the program then buy a license to get the full version. What "innovative" "entrepreneurial" steps do you suggest for me to maximise my profits?

      You're not getting away with a bullshit answer, either you tell me what's wrong with what I do and what I should do in a concrete way instead in order to maximise profits, or I'll see myself forced to accept your apology.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    132. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      What is there to save? You insulted someone you don't know and their work which you have never heard of, in a most gratuitous way. That's obviously a butthurt counter-trolling attempt.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    133. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      If a well known and highly regarded author can't make this work for a simple book, what makes you think this would even come close to funding something like a Hollywood movie.

      What makes you think a well known and highly regarded author couldn't make it work for a simple book? It hasn't been tried.

      (Perhaps you're thinking of Stephen King's The Plant, but his model for that book was not what I'm advocating. It doesn't matter what proportion of readers pay; what matters is how much money you collect in total.)

      You won't get a million people to pay for something that hasn't even been created. What happens when they don't like the final product?

      Then you have a conflict. How it gets resolved depends on what the conflict is about.

      What happens if I don't like my haircut? I probably get a refund or at least a discount. Partly because they want me to come back, partly because I probably told them how I wanted it cut and they did something else instead.

      What happens if I hire a VP to run my company, and after a year, I don't like the decisions he's been making? No refund. I hired him to use his judgment, which he did; it just turned out that his judgment wasn't what I really wanted.

      Will people get thier money back if they end up not liking it?

      If the author failed to deliver on his promises, then yes, he broke the deal and owes them a refund. If he delivered what he promised but people imagined that would mean something else, oh well, they're only out $10.

      How much say does each individual have in the making of the work? How do you get 10 million people to agree on direction?

      That's for them and the author to work out. It'd be interesting to see what sort of models for group decision making came out of this. One extreme would be "none": the author describes his idea and people either support it or don't. The other extreme would be "everything": people vote on what they want and then an author steps in to provide it.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    134. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      It is when you're in business. Think about it.

      No, it really isn't. Losing money means you're poorer today than you were yesterday. Not-gaining money means you're no richer and no poorer. By your logic, you're "losing" the $20 in my pocket right now.

      That's how it effectively works for me, sorry if it goes against your wishful thinking. You couldn't get a free copy of my program if your life depended on it. The facts are on my side.

      If you've really created uncrackable DRM, why are you still writing software that only 300 people want? Media and software companies would pay billions for the secret of how to perfectly prevent copying. Why don't you sell it to them?

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    135. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a barber, dumbass, I'm the engineer who made the barber machine that replaces the barber.

      Then what you need to be worried about is a "home engineer machine" that would do your job for you. But there is no such thing. We still need people to write programs, so as long as we need new programs written, programmers will be able to make money by doing it.

      You're not getting away with a bullshit answer, either you tell me what's wrong with what I do and what I should do in a concrete way instead in order to maximise profits, or I'll see myself forced to accept your apology.

      Why should I care about maximizing your profits? The innovations you're missing are innovations in business model.

      You still think that the valuable thing you provide is licenses, not labor. That's antiquated thinking. As copyright becomes harder and harder to enforce, and as your magically uncrackable DRM is revealed to be as flawed as every other scheme that's been tried, that antiquated thinking is not going to help you adapt to a world where you can't rely on selling copies.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    136. Re:What do you expect? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      There's more at work here than just the fact that suddenly otherwise law-abiding citizens have decided to become criminals.

      Copyright is a bargain, a compromise that people submit to like civilized adults - but only in so much as it's perceived to be fair. Once eternal copyright was enacted the fairness of the proposition ended, as did the voluntary compliance. This was predicted long ago:

      I will only say this, that if the measure before us should pass, and should produce one-tenth part of the evil which it is calculated to produce, and which I fully expect it to produce, there will soon be a remedy, though of a very objectionable kind. Just as the absurd acts which prohibited the sale of game were virtually repealed by the poacher, just as many absurd revenue acts have been virtually repealed by the smuggler, so will this law be virtually repealed by piratical booksellers. At present the holder of copyright has the public feeling on his side. Those who invade copyright are regarded as knaves who take the bread out of the mouths of deserving men. Everybody is well pleased to see them restrained by the law, and compelled to refund their ill-gotten gains. No tradesman of good repute will have anything to do with such disgraceful transactions. Pass this law: and that feeling is at an end. Men very different from the present race of piratical booksellers will soon infringe this intolerable monopoly. Great masses of capital will be constantly employed in the violation of the law. Every art will be employed to evade legal pursuit; and the whole nation will be in the plot. On which side indeed should the public sympathy be when the question is whether some book as popular as Robinson Crusoe, or the Pilgrim's Progress, shall be in every cottage, or whether it shall be confined to the libraries of the rich for the advantage of the great-grandson of a bookseller who, a hundred years before, drove a hard bargain for the copyright with the author when in great distress? Remember too that, when once it ceases to be considered as wrong and discreditable to invade literary property, no person can say where the invasion will stop. The public seldom makes nice distinctions. The wholesome copyright which now exists will share in the disgrace and danger of the new copyright which you are about to create. And you will find that, in attempting to impose unreasonable restraints on the reprinting of the works of the dead, you have, to a great extent, annulled those restraints which now prevent men from pillaging and defrauding the living.

      -Thomas Macaulay

      Copyright holders have by getting what they want ended their advantage.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    137. Re:What do you expect? by Draek · · Score: 1

      And as for your "artificial scarcity" thing, that's a stupid point, because once again you're focusing on what doesn't matter, the nearly costless distribution, and not on what costs money, developer work. In other words, people don't pay for the copy, people pay for the service of me developing it.

      Then charge for the service of you developing it, not for the individual copies. As nearly the entire industry does today.

      What god damn monopoly? Do you even know what a monopoly is? No ones granting me any monopoly, so what the fuck are you babbling about?

      Copyright is a time-limited, government-granted monopoly. That's how it was first defined, and that's how it still works.

      There's little funnier to do on Slashdot than trolling suckers like you into trying to explain why everything should be free. Which is where you disappoint me, nowhere in your post are you arguing for why you think things should be the way you'd like them to be, two thirds of it is personal insults on me and my work which you know nothing about in a pathetic effort to counter-troll me, the rest is in essence quoting random bits I said and saying "no ur wrong".

      At least you do admit to being a troll. Thing is, I don't *think* copyright should be eliminated so I can hardly argue for it here, it's just your arguments against it are pathetic and make the rest of us look like lazy, greedy bastards.

      Try starting your own software company with no funds, find out for yourself how much it takes to make even a modest living out of it, see how well the sales keep up when you stop working on the program and stop promoting it (hint: nothing sells itself), then come back here and repeat your trolling attempts once you have a clue what you're talking about.

      Why would I? the standard "you pay, I write" model pays better, takes less work, and isn't threatened by basic human nature. Again, get a real job and stop crying about the 'dirty' pirates 'stealing' your work.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    138. Re:What do you expect? by PipingSnail · · Score: 1

      f you build a house you get paid ONCE by

      Because only ONE group of people can use it at any one time!

      You are missing basic and fundamental parts here:
      a) Cost of creation. If creation cost X million, but sale of individual items is small fraction of X, then of course you need to sell many items b) Created item may benefit many people at once or only a few people at once, or one person at a time. If if benefits many people at once, and they get more from using than they pay, why is that wrong, why should the creator not be rewarded? They've still benefited each user of the item to a greater extent than the user of the item has paid.

      When you finally get around to creating a digital work that takes much time (in my case, years) to create, you'll understand why your attitude is so ignorant. If you want my work, you can pay for it, or create it yourself.

    139. Re:What do you expect? by PipingSnail · · Score: 1

      That has caused many people on the other side of the transaction to believe the whole setup is bad, which leads to widespread rulebreaking.

      You are right. A whole bunch of people have realised that people are benefiting from their work without being paid for it. And now they want to be paid for it. People steal my work daily. It does not help pay the mortgage, or cover the cost of creating the work. You seem to think its perfectly OK to steal from me. BTW, the software I create, you'd only want to use it if you are in business, and thus making money from using it. People steal because they think they can and should, not any other reason.

      I abhore software patents and I do not wish for any extension of copyright law.

    140. Re:What do you expect? by PipingSnail · · Score: 1

      I pirate everything too, but I'm not an hypocrite

      Yes you are. You want to be paid for your software works, but refuse to pay others for their software works.
      That is the definition of hypocrisy. Say one thing, do the other.

      I, on the other hand, want to be paid for my work. And I damn well pay for the software I use from other vendors.

    141. Re:What do you expect? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      For what it is worth, when I run into someone who just needs to fiddle with photos they took on their fancy new camera; I always recommend the GIMP.

      If they say "I want to learn to build a professional looking website and do all my own content creation including mastering video", then I'll suggest Adobe's suites.

    142. Re:What do you expect? by Random5 · · Score: 1

      It worked for radiohead and reznor because they were already very well known and got plenty of publicity for it (in addition to all the fans who would have bought the album anyway). I myself almost downloaded Reznors despite not listening to any of his work pretty much ever.

      World of goo also rode the publicity wave being one of (if not the) first to do the 'pay what you want' thing in the games market. If you read that article you linked it mentions that Steam sales (fixed price, more conventional) had a very significant 40% increase from the promotion. And this was a fairly popular 'casual' game by that time anyway (a lot of people I know had it around january, myself included). Add in that the production costs for it were very low and yes, that model can work. My point however was that would not work for products with more significant development costs which do not already have a large following.

    143. Re:What do you expect? by GunpowderTreason · · Score: 1

      Think about it. When was the last time a well-known artist or author said "hey, I've made enough money on this work already, I'm going to release it into the public domain"?

      Search Wikipedia for "Steal This Album!" Make sure to include the exclamation point or it points to a different article. That's the reason I didn't link to it because the ! gets cut off in the link and it points to the wrong page. To be clear I don't like the way that copyright laws are going but System of a Down proves that not all content creators are evil greedy monsters. Just 99% of them.

    144. Re:What do you expect? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The notion that intellectual property rights have certain limits, especially on the length of time you can claim those rights has been part of the laws of copyright and patent for a very long time.

      More than that. Copyright *requires* giving away everything you made for free. That's the core basis of it. The government just encourages release of information by giving a temporary limited monopoly to that information to encourage even more donations to the Public Domain. But it is impossible to claim copyright protections for a regular work without releasing it to the Public Domain (time release, but released non the less).

      So, anyone that believes in Copyright as done in the US (and I'd guess the rest of the world as well) believes in the core tenet that everything is necessarily Public Domain and the purpose of Copyright is to get the most material possible into the Public Domain. All copyrighted works belong to the public, so anyone that copyrights something is obviously a communist.

    145. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, believing in "intellectual property" is fascism. The term is typical Orwellian newspeak. Property is material, not intellectual.

    146. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Copyright is a time-limited, government-granted monopoly.

      A monopoly on what, copyrights?

      Then charge for the service of you developing it, not for the individual copies. As nearly the entire industry does today.

      How the fuck is that supposed to work? Am I supposed to say "hey random people, I want to develop a program that does this and that. Please gather up $10,000 to give to me and in 6 months I'll give you the program in question"?

      At least you do admit to being a troll.

      Humm yeah, do you have signatures disabled or something? That's like a disclaimer right there.

      Thing is, I don't *think* copyright should be eliminated so I can hardly argue for it here, it's just your arguments against it are pathetic and make the rest of us look like lazy, greedy bastards.

      Who's talking about copyright? I wasn't, I never mentioned copyright, I talked about wanting everything for free.

      Why would I? the standard "you pay, I write" model pays better, takes less work, and isn't threatened by basic human nature.

      Who the fuck is supposed to pay me for something I haven't done yet? I don't know in what market that's supposed to work, but in my market (commercial audio apps for people who make music), it doesn't work this way at all, and no one does it this way.

      Again, get a real job and stop crying about the 'dirty' pirates 'stealing' your work.

      Again, wishful reading. How can I cry about people stealing my work when no one's stealing my work to begin with?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    147. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      But there is no such thing. We still need people to write programs, so as long as we need new programs written, programmers will be able to make money by doing it.

      No shit, tell me something I don't know.

      Why should I care about maximizing your profits? The innovations you're missing are innovations in business model.

      I accept your apology.

      You still think that the valuable thing you provide is licenses, not labor. That's antiquated thinking. As copyright becomes harder and harder to enforce, and as your magically uncrackable DRM is revealed to be as flawed as every other scheme that's been tried, that antiquated thinking is not going to help you adapt to a world where you can't rely on selling copies.

      Dude, Bill Gates is like the richest mother fucker on Earth, all from selling software, even though every single of his products get pirated before they're even released. Piracy isn't such a big deal when it comes to revenue, so it really doesn't threaten that business model unlike what you wishfully like to think.

      And tell me, how am I supposed to be paid for my work when I haven't done any work yet, as you suggested? Oh wait, I already asked you for a real answer to that and you refused to answer under the pretence of apathy. More like because you have no fucking clue what should be done, your just pushing your bullshit ideology on me but when it comes to explaining how it can work for me and how it can make things better there's no one left to answer. So all the fuck you're doing is talking shit about what I do and insulting me and my work while you don't have any fucking clue what I could do better. So shut the fuck up.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    148. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      No, it really isn't. Losing money means you're poorer today than you were yesterday. Not-gaining money means you're no richer and no poorer. By your logic, you're "losing" the $20 in my pocket right now.

      So by that logic if the guy who writes your pay check writes $20 off your pay check you're not losing anything, but if he's stealing $20 from your wallet then you're losing something. You're the dumbass who's arguing that the net effect for you isn't the same. Just drop the dumbass semantics.

      If you've really created uncrackable DRM, why are you still writing software that only 300 people want? Media and software companies would pay billions for the secret of how to perfectly prevent copying. Why don't you sell it to them?

      My sarcasm detector is tingling. I didn't write an uncrackable DRM, actually my program can be cracked under a minute. The thing is, in order to get the program, you need a serial number appended to your download link, and to get this you need to send me money. Theoretically someone who would have bought it could crack it and release it or not crack it but release it along with his license, but no one's done it so far despite 300 sales, so even if one day someone eventually warezes it it's no big deal. Actually I was gonna try to work on something harder to crack, but I was advised by people who've been there and done that that I'd lose more by wasting my time trying to prevent piracy than I'd lose by eventually getting pirated (don't even bother to argue that I wouldn't lose anything in either case, I got it). And I didn't get pirated despite this number of sales, much to my surprise. Actually someone even argued to me that pirating an old version of my program could improve my sales by improving my visibility (i.e. people try the old pirated version and want to buy the new one for its new features or whatever, give how an old full version does arguably less than even the (latest) demo version), I even gave the cracked version of the initial release for someone to leak it, but it didn't catch on and is nowhere to be found...

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    149. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      And tell me, how am I supposed to be paid for my work when I haven't done any work yet, as you suggested? Oh wait, I already asked you for a real answer to that and you refused to answer under the pretence of apathy.

      No, the question you asked before was about maximizing your profits. Now you're asking a different question, which I will happily answer.

      The way you can be paid for your work when you haven't done any work yet is, quite simply, the same way everyone else does it. This is a business model that's been used for centuries. It's the same way you pay for haircuts, landscaping, day care, accounting, or any other service.

      You have a couple choices: you can get someone to promise you money beforehand, then you do the work, then you get the money. Or you can get someone to actually give you the money first, in exchange for your promise to do the work. Either way, if one of you holds up his side of the deal and the other doesn't, the other can sue for breach of contract.

      So all the fuck you're doing is talking shit about what I do and insulting me and my work while you don't have any fucking clue what I could do better.

      As you may recall, you're the one who started with the insults, and I'm not trying to "make things better" for you. I'm explaining a business model that eliminates the problem of piracy. If you don't think piracy is a problem, then feel free to ignore it.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    150. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      So by that logic if the guy who writes your pay check writes $20 off your pay check you're not losing anything, but if he's stealing $20 from your wallet then you're losing something.

      Correct. One makes me a little less rich than I should be, the other actually makes me poorer.

      The difference between pay checks and software sales is that there actually is an answer to the question "how much should I be getting paid?", but there is no answer to "how many copies should I be selling?"

      My pay check is set by the terms of my employment. Your sales, however, are set by the whims of your customers. If I work X hours, my employer is obligated to pay me $Y under the terms of our mutual agreement, but no one is obligated to pay you anything.

      If they download your software but don't pay for it, you get $0. On the other hand, if they read a bad review and choose not to use your software at all, you also get $0. Are you "losing" money when they read that bad review? Is the reviewer stealing money out of your pocket? Of course not. The only difference is that the pirate gets a copy of your software -- which costs you nothing -- and the guy who read the bad review doesn't. It's different from his perspective, but not from yours.

      So if you're going to compare the "net effect" of piracy to theft, then you'd better make the same comparison for bad reviews... and competing software... and economic downturn... and every other reason that someone might decide not to give you their money.

      I didn't write an uncrackable DRM, actually my program can be cracked under a minute. The thing is, in order to get the program, you need a serial number appended to your download link, and to get this you need to send me money. Theoretically someone who would have bought it could crack it and release it or not crack it but release it along with his license, but no one's done it so far despite 300 sales, so even if one day someone eventually warezes it it's no big deal.

      Heh. How do you think most software gets pirated? Someone buys a copy, cracks it if necessary, and shares it with the world. 300 sales is hardly a big enough sample to conclude that your customers are less inclined to share your software than, say, Adobe's customers.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    151. Re:What do you expect? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      There are three assumptions in you argument that I would contest -

      1. A lack of copyright laws would mean that total revenue on sales of copies of artistic works would be untenably lower than they are now, and certainly not higher.
      2. The cost of producing artistic works can't be significantly lowered
      3. The cost of marketing artistic works can't be significantly lowered

      My argument is that none of those assumptions are necessarily true, and in my opinion none of them are.

      The argument that expensive or obscure projects are difficult/risky to make a profit on applies whether or not copyright exists. If an absence of copyright laws reduces revenue by say 50% then all that does is increase the incentive to be more efficient and produce better work for less money.

      I think the bone of contention here is how much of a reduction in revenue would a lack of copyright laws create? As I understand it, you're arguing that the reduction would be great enough that it would make production of a lot of works untenable. I think that all it would do is change the way works are produced. And I also think that there would be a lot of cases where projects would make more money or would even become actually feasible only because of an absence of copyright laws.

      There are also the gains to society as a whole to be made from the abolition of copyright. How much time and money are tied up in wasteful bureaucracy create by the copyright industry? How much culture and knowledge are obscured and partitioned away from the poorer members of the population? How many works are unrealised due to the costs associated with copyright issues/disputes?

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    152. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      You have a couple choices: you can get someone to promise you money beforehand, then you do the work, then you get the money. Or you can get someone to actually give you the money first, in exchange for your promise to do the work. Either way, if one of you holds up his side of the deal and the other doesn't, the other can sue for breach of contract.

      And who on Earth in my specific market would pay for that? Let me guess, a software company that would then sell copies to individual users? Yeah, a middleman, that changes everything.

      you're the one who started with the insults

      Aduh, dumbass, I always start with insults, that's my arguing style. That's not the point, the point is all you did was talk shit and the little you did that wasn't insulting was stupid and short on practical details.

      I'm explaining a business model that eliminates the problem of piracy. If you don't think piracy is a problem, then feel free to ignore it.

      Like I said in my other post, it's not a problem. Maybe you'd know that if you actually dealt with the business side of things that deals with end users.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    153. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Correct. One makes me a little less rich than I should be, the other actually makes me poorer.

      Yep, still semantics, which all comes down to the same net result. So, I was right all along and you're a dumbass who likes to make bullshit arguments. And who obviously likes to make them drag the fuck on, I mean come on!

      The difference between pay checks and software sales is that there actually is an answer to the question "how much should I be getting paid?", but there is no answer to "how many copies should I be selling?"

      The difference is illusory, because practically lower odds of a sale are the same as being paid less money. That's the law of large numbers for you.

      Is the reviewer stealing money out of your pocket?

      Is your employer stealing money out of your pocket when they write $20 out of your pay check? Yep, dumbass rhetoric question that has no regard for net effects.

      300 sales is hardly a big enough sample to conclude that your customers are less inclined to share your software than, say, Adobe's customers.

      Moron, you'll put words in my mouth just for the sake of having something to argue, won't you? No one said anything about my customers being less inclined to pirate my software than Adobe's, only that at that point it proves that the problem of piracy isn't important enough for me to care.

      I like posting on Slashdot to discuss things and troll at the same time, but let's face it, you're obviously a pretty stupid person, and you try to make up for your lack of intelligence and points to make with stubbornness. This conversation stopped being worthwhile a long time ago. How about you just drop it, I'm not interested in your ideology-fuelled suggestions on how to solve an inexistent problem and in the process make less money, or even your infeasible approaches to business, only making more money. See, you're just an armchair expert discussing things you have no first hand experience with, things which happen to be my business and livelihood. You're just wasting my time, I have little curiosity left for your worthless and misinformed opinions on how I should run my business.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    154. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      The difference is illusory, because practically lower odds of a sale are the same as being paid less money. [...] Yep, dumbass rhetoric question that has no regard for net effects.

      So you're just going to ignore the fact that bad reviews have the same "net effect" on your odds of a sale that piracy does? For someone who claims to only be interested in money, it's amusing how selective your outrage is over the potential loss of revenue.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    155. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      And who on Earth in my specific market would pay for that?

      If your claims can be believed, there are at least 300 people who benefit from the existence of your software and have demonstrated a willingness to pay for its development, so you can start with them. Or did you just make up that number?

      Let me guess, a software company that would then sell copies to individual users? Yeah, a middleman, that changes everything.

      Heh, and to think you accuse me of putting words in your mouth just to argue against them.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    156. Re:What do you expect? by Random5 · · Score: 1

      Good points. Starting with the simplest (i'm mainly looking at the music industry here) 2) is not really true, while protools has lowered the entry price for 'garage bands' the production of more mainstream successful albums takes expensive equipment and expertise which can't be reduced. It would be very true for the blockbuster movie industry, then untrue again for the majority TV series which are on lower budgets (though this is more guesswork) 3) is certainly not true, marketing is only really an important expense in the popular market where there are a large number of products of similar quality and market presence seems to determine success. In other circles 'word of mouth' is more important.

      1) This is very hard to determine empirically, for my opinion I'm working off the assumptions
      a) given a choice of what to pay, people will pay a lot less than current retail
      b) lowered cost will not increase sales of individual works sufficiently to offset the price decrease assuming all products in the market undergo the same price decrease.
      b depends on peoples buying habits, I'm making an assumption that people who are currently forced to spend x amount to get everything they really want would given the choice, buy more items at a lower price but still spend

      The other issue with abolishing copyright is plagarism / IP theft, which is an issue even with the copyright system. Granted the current system is unfair to those who are plagarised by parties they do not have the funding to challenge legally but there is a lot of theft it currently prevents.

    157. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      It all comes down to how much you lose/fail to make. I don't know whether or not bad reviews would have worse an impact that piracy, it would probably depend on who does the bad review and how widespread the piracy.

      And I'm not outraged over potential loss of revenue, I'm 'outraged' (although that's not the best term) that people would demand everything for free for the sake that it's supposedly the thing to do. Not only they but they insult my sense of business and even my work for not complying with their ideology that origins in trying to justify their greed and turning it into a moral higher ground.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    158. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      If your claims can be believed, there are at least 300 people who benefit from the existence of your software and have demonstrated a willingness to pay for its development, so you can start with them. Or did you just make up that number?

      None of them would have given a dime for the promise that eventually such a program would be made, mostly when nothing of it would exist to show what would exist. I mean seriously, how fucking stupid can you be to seriously think it could possibly work? And also, you want the same people who paid me to be able to use my work immediately to instead pay me, then wait months or a year, and finally getting to use what they paid for?? Really?? Just for the principle that I'd be 'paid for my labour' instead of 'paid for distributing'. Fucking moron, stick to typing code and stay away from any business aspect that pertains to marketing. You're just a cretin who because he gets paid to write code thinks that everything should work like this without any clue or regard for how things really work outside his tiny bubble. Clueless opinionated dumbass.

      Heh, and to think you accuse me of putting words in your mouth just to argue against them.

      Yeah well, what else was I supposed to infer from your suggestion? You sure can't be blamed for giving too many details.

      Love the brown light next to your name, it reads 'Freak', it should rather read 'Butthurt' :D

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    159. Re:What do you expect? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think a well known and highly regarded author couldn't make it work for a simple book? It hasn't been tried.

      (Perhaps you're thinking of Stephen King's The Plant, but his model for that book was not what I'm advocating. It doesn't matter what proportion of readers pay; what matters is how much money you collect in total.)

      The point was that he didn't collect enough to make it worth his time to write more books, I don't think he'd care if only 10% paid if he was able to do well enough to encourage him to write more.

      If the author failed to deliver on his promises, then yes, he broke the deal and owes them a refund. If he delivered what he promised but people imagined that would mean something else, oh well, they're only out $10.

      Who said anything about failing to deliver what he promised? Even good directors or authors make duds once in a while, which is part of the point. Oh, and I don't think many people (especially now) are going to be like "oh well, its only $10." People will bitch about $0.50. And yes, I've seen people demand (and get) their money back for not liking a movie.

      That's for them and the author to work out. It'd be interesting to see what sort of models for group decision making came out of this. One extreme would be "none": the author describes his idea and people either support it or don't. The other extreme would be "everything": people vote on what they want and then an author steps in to provide it.

      I don't see that working, for the simple reason that if people are only going to be paying a small amount, its not ever going to be feasible to allow any feedback. And of course it will only take a few times of not having input and not getting what they want to discourage this model in the future.

      If your idea was workable, we'd be doing it already.

    160. Re:What do you expect? by NervousWreck · · Score: 1

      If you create something, than you can put it to work for you as long as you live and that's great. That's why you did it. For life + is just saying that some people are free to put the deceased's creativity to work for them while others can't even use it without paying this handful of people. Now which one respects the property owner more?

      --
      I do not have a sig. You are hallucinating.
    161. Re:What do you expect? by severoon · · Score: 1

      Well, the "service" business model doesn't work for everything, for example it wouldn't work with my program for which no support is needed.

      I submit that there is an excellent chance your program is worthless from an economic standpoint. Unless you have done something that no one else on earth knows how to do, there is nothing stopping an open source developer from rewriting it and releasing it. Perhaps no one has done this yet—but to me, that means there isn't much demand for whatever you've done or it would have been a priority to the open source world.

      Please don't confuse what I'm saying with some kind of value judgment on your work. I'm not slamming it, I'm only saying that a thing's utility and economic value are very different. And I have a pretty good handle on the economic value given the fact that you're posting here on /. instead of skiing down an Alpine mountain while drinking Cristal and eating filet mignon.

      People get lots of money from doing much less.

      Sure, there are outliers, but by and large people who accumulate a lot of wealth do so by creating value for society. I'm sure you can point to individual examples, but can you point to a significant demographic of the population that gets a lot for "doing much less"? I submit that you cannot...because if you could, there would be an influx of people wanting that job...salaries they could demand would go down, etc.

      Are you actually asking for how long are you entitled to receive money from the work you did after you stopped doing anything to it? Sounds like what you're pondering to me! Is it fair to reap the fruits from something you did 20 years ago? What's fair?

      No, I'm not asking that. I'm saying what actually happens, and what people actually do, per the example with the marketing software company I worked for.

      Look, if I tell you that I've created this epic application and I'll never update it or extend it or release it for others to work on or support it again, it's done for now and ever and nothing is ever going to happen with it from here on out, would you pay me for it? If you go through the list of software you currently have on your computer and ask yourself that question for each and every one, what percentage of apps in that situation would you still pay for? Not many, I expect.

      I pirate anything I want cause I need it/want it and I don't have the money for it and even if I did I'd rather not pay for what I can have for free...

      See, this is exactly what I'm saying. You pirate software why? Because you'd get no value out of paying for it. There's no incentive for you to do so. To you, buying it and stealing it result in the exact same situation...there's no more benefit to you one way or the other. In your zeal to argue, you've proven my point...you yourself are not willing to pay for something that can be digitally mass produced for free.

      On the other hand, if you can get people to pay you for something you've done once, great, more power to you. I'm just saying that it's not a sustainable business model across the industry, even though there are small pockets like perhaps you've found, if you scaled your business up you'd find diminishing returns unless you provided ongoing work on it. (Especially once it became popular and someone made an open source knock-off.)

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    162. Re:What do you expect? by WNight · · Score: 1

      Pft. Not at all. I share to at least 250% when torrenting!

      Really though, who is the leech? The person who hears and song and wants to share it with their friend, or the person who through legal means totally and unwillingly financed by masses has obtained a government monopoly on that sound?

      It might have made sense when the only way to duplicate things, books, records, etc, was in a studio and that meant that copying was someone specifically taking distribution profits from the right people. When someone's making money, sure, why not conspire to make sure the author gets some.

      But today recordings aren't the domain of specialized studios. Since the 70s tape recorders were common and today I've got five nearby devices that record audio/video - not counting actual cameras.

      For there to be laws that criminalize recording or sharing environmental sounds (which often include radios, movies, etc) is just ridiculous. Times change.

      Get your tax collectors and lawyers out of our lives, leech!

    163. Re:What do you expect? by WNight · · Score: 1

      I am even more aware that if you don't financially support things you enjoy, they may disappear.

      Sure.

      How often do you write a check to the family of whoever coined the phrase 'content creators'?

      First off, I've never received a dime for using the phrase content creator.

      You benefit from its use. It illustrates points you want to make. You could say a generic "someone who created content" but that doesn't have the same polish, nor does it imply a creator/consumer dichotomy. Without that, how do you paint this as a greed thing?

      Common sense, legislation, and a free market govern what constitutes actual original content. A common two-word phrase that is used ubiquitously is not the same as a movie, a CD or a video game.

      That's just what seems reasonable to you on the surface. But why shouldn't people who create phrases like that benefit when you use them to achieve your goals, especially where money would be involved?

      Throw in a few 'piracy' of 'intellectual property' phrases and you've made it sound like those people who merely don't support patents are vicious murderers.

      Poor analogies and hyperbole are only tools that you hope will obfuscate the issue.

      Exactly.

      People who produce content that others digest deserve to get paid.

      Does the goatse.cx guy get paid? Or the cameraman? For the number of views, or intentional views? Does the same standard apply to the makers of Gigli? Should he own the rights to derivative works?

      Do they deserve full opening-night rates, or some sort of pro-rated sum based on reviews? How much does a screen-shot in a textbook, illustrating bad technique, cost?

      Does Ted Bundy deserve royalties from the news/movies about him and his actions, etc.

      Let's stop using words like deserve and quit making hard and fast rules. Instead, how about just remembering "if I care to see this remain, how do I help?"

    164. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      The point was that he didn't collect enough to make it worth his time to write more books, I don't think he'd care if only 10% paid if he was able to do well enough to encourage him to write more.

      Well, he did care. The terms were that he would keep writing if 75% of readers paid a fixed price (first $1, then $2). He got over 75% for part 1, around 70% for part 2, 75% again for part 3, and finally 46% for part 4 after raising the price to $2.

      There are a few problems with this model. One is that it doesn't map to reality: the proportion of readers who pay isn't really relevant, because people who read but don't pay pose no additional cost for the author (other than bandwidth). Setting a fixed price would accurately capture the value of the author's time.

      Another problem is that this model doesn't give anyone much chance to influence the outcome. If I really like the work and am willing to pay more than my "fair share" to continue it, I'm still only one person. It's a lot easier for me to just write a big check toward a fixed goal than to influence the proportion of paying readers. Also, if there's a fixed goal, we all know how close we are to meeting it, and progress can only move toward that goal; if we're looking at the proportion instead, that number changes with every new reader, and it may move backward.

      Who said anything about failing to deliver what he promised? Even good directors or authors make duds once in a while, which is part of the point.

      Like I said, the same thing happens in every industry. When you pay people to do something for you, sometimes you'll be disappointed. Whether you get a refund depends on (1) whether they actually broke their promises or whether you just expected something different, and (2) how much they want your future business. People have been dealing with that situation for centuries, and it works just fine.

      If your idea was workable, we'd be doing it already.

      I don't think so. Playing the copyright lottery is more convenient and more exciting for authors, even if it's financially worse in the long run, and consumers likewise find it more convenient to buy a disc in a box than to pay for development directly. My idea isn't competing on a level playing field, because the current business model is effectively subsidized (by the money we spend enforcing copyright and by the rights we give up).

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    165. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      You're just a cretin who because he gets paid to write code thinks that everything should work like this without any clue or regard for how things really work outside his tiny bubble. Clueless opinionated dumbass.

      Yes, that's what you tell yourself. But of course you know it's not true, which is why you've become so insecure that you're punctuating every sentence with an insult.

      Yeah well, what else was I supposed to infer from your suggestion?

      A real entrepreneur would've thought through the possibilities. You, on the other hand, are incapable of considering anything other than what you're used to: charging for distribution is all you know, so you assumed it must still be involved.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    166. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      And I'm not outraged over potential loss of revenue, I'm 'outraged' (although that's not the best term) that people would demand everything for free for the sake that it's supposedly the thing to do.

      Ah, I see. You're confused: no one is demanding anything for free. My only demand is that you don't tell me what I can or can't do with my own equipment and media, or what I can or can't send and receive over the internet. Beyond that, you can charge whatever you want for whatever you want.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    167. Re:What do you expect? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      Plagiarism is a completely different beast. Copyright violators are not claiming authorship, plagiarists are. Copyright need not be violated to commit plagiarism, as for instance if a student steals another student's essay out of a locker and hands it in as their own work. Or, if several students conspire to claim authorship of another student's work on behalf of one of them, so that it isn't one student's word versus another, it's many students' word versus one.

      It is unfortunate that many are confused on this point, and seem to think that copyright prevents plagiarism. It only stops plagiarism in the same way that tax laws stop drug dealing. We don't need copyright to handle plagiarism. We shouldn't keep copyright for a reason like that.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    168. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      You, on the other hand, are incapable of considering anything other than what you're used to

      No, I've considered your dumbass suggestions and deemed them stupid. You have yet to come up with an alternative course of action that even makes sense.

      Yes, that's what you tell yourself. But of course you know it's not true, which is why you've become so insecure that you're punctuating every sentence with an insult.

      lol, oh yeah? Well you're so insecure that you have to respond to my insults to you by claiming that I'm insecure so it reassures you. Or if you prefer, NO U!

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    169. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Right, that's TOTALLY consistent with the entire discussion we've just had.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    170. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I submit that there is an excellent chance your program is worthless from an economic standpoint.

      If it makes money (over $13,000 since January so far) then how does it make it economically worthless? I guess it only does only if you go "if X and Y and if Z then your program is worthless". Let's see if that's the way you go...

      Unless you have done something that no one else on earth knows how to do, there is nothing stopping an open source developer from rewriting it and releasing it.

      Well, what I did was fairly unique, and no one has rewritten it and released it, so what you're saying is "if an open source developer rewrote the exact same thing and released it for free then your program would be worthless". Yeah, that's a pretty big if.

      Perhaps no one has done this yet—but to me, that means there isn't much demand for whatever you've done or it would have been a priority to the open source world.

      So what you're saying is "your program must be worthless cause if it was worthy then someone would have taken the aforementioned steps to make it worthless". Makes you wonder how any software can be worth anything the way you view things. But again, if you were right my program wouldn't have made $13,000, which it did, so you're wrong that it's worthless, unless you have a definition for 'worthless' that somehow can be reconciled with "makes significant sums of money".

      As I've argued in a post of mine you may have not read, open source is only able to compete with commercial programs when the appeal is, to developers, wide enough, and how feasible the task is to them. In my market, audio programs, there's very little FOSS software that compares with commercial programs, except for very trivial things that no one would pay more than $5 for. You can't even find a decent FOSS audio editor. So for something cutting edge like my program, I have little to fear, it's not just about anyone who could do something like this, and if they could they'd be stupid to give it up for free. And to use your style of self-proving argument, I'll submit that someone smart enough to write a program like mine wouldn't be stupid enough to release it for free ;-).

      Just so you know what you're talking about, here's the program in question. The FOSS program that comes the closest is the FOSS project of mine it was based on, ARSS, which is a command-line utility, so yeah, doesn't really compare.

      And I have a pretty good handle on the economic value given the fact that you're posting here on /. instead of skiing down an Alpine mountain while drinking Cristal and eating filet mignon.

      You love arguments that magically prove themselves, don't you? I think the fact that John Carmack posts on Slashdot invalidates that, but I'm not rolling on gold either, although I do make a living off my program, which is in itself quite extraordinary considered what my program is and how not straightforward it is to convince people they need it (let alone pay for it).

      Sure, there are outliers, but by and large people who accumulate a lot of wealth do so by creating value for society. I'm sure you can point to individual examples, but can you point to a significant demographic of the population that gets a lot for "doing much less"? I submit that you cannot...because if you could, there would be an influx of people wanting that job...salaries they could demand would go down, etc.

      Dude, I work hard and make half the minimum salary. It won't be hard to find people who make ten times what I do while working less hard.

      Look, if I tell you that I've created this epic application and I'll never update it or extend it or release it for others to work on or support it again, it's done for now and ever and nothing is ever going to happen with it from here on out, would you pay me for it?

      I can tell you that even if you don't tell anyone that then no one will pa

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    171. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Indeed it is. Glad you're finally catching on.

      If everyone is allowed to use their own equipment, media, and internet connection as they see fit, selling copies will cease to be viable: why should anyone buy a copy from you when they can get a copy for free from someone who's willing to share?

      Charging for your labor, on the other hand, will still work just fine: they can't copy what hasn't been written, so if they want new software and no one will write it for free, they have no choice but to pay a programmer to write it.

      Again, no one is demanding that you do anything for free. If no one is paying you to write code, and you don't feel like writing code for free, then don't write it. One of three things will happen: they'll find someone else who does feel like writing code for free, or they'll pay you to write it, or they'll realize they don't need that code written after all.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    172. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Oh God, when is this going to end. Just wondering, do you often make discussions drag the fuck on for like 20 replies, or are you doing something special for me? If stubbornness could win you arguments you'd have a shot at winning this one.

      why should anyone buy a copy from you when they can get a copy for free from someone who's willing to share?

      And we've come full circle, so I'll have to repeat what I've said in my earlier posts. because they can't find it anywhere else.

      Charging for your labor, on the other hand, will still work just fine: they can't copy what hasn't been written, so if they want new software and no one will write it for free, they have no choice but to pay a programmer to write it.

      Shut the fuck up, dumbass. No ones gonna pay you for you to do shit unless they're a company. I don't cater to companies, I cater to individual users, home and studio users.

      Again, no one is demanding that you do anything for free. If no one is paying you to write code, and you don't feel like writing code for free, then don't write it.

      God damn, how fucking dumb can you be? So your suggestion is, if you're not going to do things the ass backwards way I suggested of getting people to pay for the promise you might do something, then deprive yourself from making any money when you can make some? I've talked to a lot of stupid people on Slashdot, abysmal cretins, morons with delusions of intelligence, but out of them all you're the winner, because you don't only say stupid things, you dismiss any explanation of what's wrong with the stupid things you say and you keep repeating them in the hope they'll eventually stop being stupid. I say bravo!

      One of three things will happen: they'll find someone else who does feel like writing code for free, or they'll pay you to write it, or they'll realize they don't need that code written after all.

      OK imagine you're that Ford guy. Who's gonna pay you to build cars? Who's gonna build them cars for no profit? Who's gonna sit down and say "well who needs automobiles anyway"? Oh, what's that? That's not the way it works at all? What is it? First you build and market the cars and people decide whether or not they want to buy some and that's how it's worked for mostly anything since the dawn of time? Well what do you know!

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    173. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Oh God, when is this going to end. Just wondering, do you often make discussions drag the fuck on for like 20 replies, or are you doing something special for me? If stubbornness could win you arguments you'd have a shot at winning this one.

      I'm not "making" anything happen. I'm replying to your messages and you're replying to mine.

      And we've come full circle, so I'll have to repeat what I've said in my earlier posts. because they can't find it anywhere else.

      Fair enough. You also said earlier that you don't think that will change: you don't think people will share your program once they buy it. Is that correct? You don't need copyright?

      So your suggestion is, if you're not going to do things the ass backwards way I suggested of getting people to pay for the promise you might do something, then deprive yourself from making any money when you can make some?

      Not at all. If you think you can make money selling copies of your software without relying on a government-enforced monopoly, go right ahead.

      Can you do that? You say you don't rely on a government-enforced monopoly, but can you put your money where your mouth is? Because if you're willing to make a legally binding promise not to take any legal action against people who distribute or crack your software, I'll applaud your wise choice, and I just might buy a copy myself.

      OK imagine you're that Ford guy. Who's gonna pay you to build cars?

      People who want to travel faster than they can on horseback, I suppose. But that's beside the point, because...

      First you build and market the cars and people decide whether or not they want to buy some and that's how it's worked for mostly anything since the dawn of time? Well what do you know!

      ... you've completely missed the distinction between goods and services.

      A car is a good, a physical object. If you take a pile of metal and turn it into a car, you can hang onto that car and make sure no one else takes it, which means you can sell it: selling a car means taking money in exchange for letting go of it. If anyone else wants a car, they have to either pay you or find their own pile of metal.

      A program is not a physical object. It can be copied at virtually no cost and without you even noticing, and there's nothing you can do to stop that. You can't hang onto it, so any business model based on being able to sell copies profitably is on shaky ground: you can sell discs or downloads, but you'll be competing with others. The best you can do is pray that no one will want to compete with you for distribution, or that your DRM system won't be cracked.

      Sure, selling goods has been around since the dawn of time. But you know what else has? Providing services for money. The "world's oldest profession" is a service, not a good. The scarcity in services is in the labor, not the end result: just like the scarcity in software is in the programming labor, not in copies of the compiled program.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    174. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. You also said earlier that you don't think that will change: you don't think people will share your program once they buy it. Is that correct? You don't need copyright?

      That's correct, I don't directly need the protection offered by copyright. Not saying that I'd fare as well in a copyright-less world, but my business model doesn't really rely on copyrights.

      Not at all. If you think you can make money selling copies of your software without relying on a government-enforced monopoly, go right ahead.

      Good! Well, maybe you're not that stupid and stubborn after all!

      Can you do that? You say you don't rely on a government-enforced monopoly, but can you put your money where your mouth is? Because if you're willing to make a legally binding promise not to take any legal action against people who distribute or crack your software, I'll applaud your wise choice, and I just might buy a copy myself.

      Dude, I'm broke, and even if I had the money I couldn't be arsed to take legal action on anyone. See, there's this dude I know of who used the output from the demo of my program in a commercial release, he recorded the output because the file saving is disabled in the demo, when you're supposed to buy a commercial license to be able to use your work in a commercial release. I'm not going after him, I don't really give a crap, plus he's kind enough to write me a testimonial lol. And that licenses thing is bullshit too anyway, I have two licenses, one commercial and one non-commercial, but every single difference in licensing terms is bullshit as far as I'm concerned. That's more like pay me $40 if you want, or pay me $145 if you prefer. Although while I wouldn't take any legal action for anything I still would disable licenses, so that's reason enough not to distribute your license around. And I'm no dummy, I won't advertise "hey it's cool if you pirate me" ;-).

      ... you've completely missed the distinction between goods and services.

      And you've completely missed the fact that software is a good. I know it sounds counter intuitive, but think about it, a book is a good, a DVD is a good, yet they're all information on a media, and could be made immaterial. And if you get a movie, music or e-book online, you might consider it a service, but in reality it's the online store that sells you it that's a service, just like the book store is a service, but you still buy a good. So I sell goods, immaterial goods, even if to further blur things it's bundled with a couple of services, like support or updates. A good doesn't magically become a service because it goes immaterial.

      Providing services for money. The "world's oldest profession" is a service, not a good.

      Yep, but that's not my primary business. My primary business is, selling a good, an immaterial good. You wouldn't argue that a computer program isn't a good if it was sold as something like a ROM, and that the only way for someone else to duplicate it was to make a forged copy. But at that point the forged copy is no different than a forged Rollex, so you see, it's still all like a good, it's just easier to forge and distribute.

      And the ultimate point that will enlighten things : how do you pirate and copy a service? You can copy the distribution service, but it goes together with the bookstore as a service example. You can't copy and distribute a service, you can't copy the services of a prostitute (unless you yourself become one, at which point that's not copying but becoming legitimate competition, which is what you do when you choose to distribute my immaterial goods, you become a competition for my distribution service), you can't copy the services a nurse, of a marketing agency, of a personal coach, of an accountant, and so forth. So software itself isn't a service, cause if it was it couldn't be copied. Making the software is a sort of service (although often enough done not for the end users but done for the distributi

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    175. Re:What do you expect? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Dude, I'm broke, and even if I had the money I couldn't be arsed to take legal action on anyone.

      Not quite as strong a statement as I expected. If you really think you can sell copies of software without relying on copyright, why not put that theory to the test by making a clear, unambiguous statement: "I promise not to take any legal action against any person for redistributing or cracking my software"?

      And you've completely missed the fact that software is a good. I know it sounds counter intuitive, but think about it, a book is a good, a DVD is a good, yet they're all information on a media, and could be made immaterial.

      The moment they become immaterial, they stop being goods.

      A book is a good, but the story is not. A DVD is a good, but the movie is not. A CD-ROM is a good, and arguably a digital download is a good, but the program is not. Only the physical forms are goods.

      A good doesn't magically become a service because it goes immaterial.

      Right, it becomes information, which is neither service nor good. The number representing a program isn't a good any more than the number representing the speed of light is a good. You can charge someone for the act of coming up with that number (production service) or for telling them that number (distribution service), or you can write the number down and sell a physical copy (a good), but the number itself is just a number.

      You wouldn't argue that a computer program isn't a good if it was sold as something like a ROM, and that the only way for someone else to duplicate it was to make a forged copy. But at that point the forged copy is no different than a forged Rollex, so you see, it's still all like a good, it's just easier to forge and distribute.

      There's nothing "forged" about it. It's a perfect, identical copy, every bit as good as the copies you're trying to sell. The physical form or the delivery mechanism might be different, but the information itself is the same no matter where you get it.

      So software itself isn't a service, cause if it was it couldn't be copied.

      Likewise, software itself isn't a good, because if it were, it could only be in one place at a time, and you'd be able to detect when someone was "taking" it and stop them.

      Making the software is a sort of service (although often enough done not for the end users but done for the distribution service), and you can't copy that. You can only copy the resulting good created by the service.

      Yes, that's mostly right. Programming is a service, and a physical copy of the software is a good. But the software itself is neither.

      You can't copy services, and that's precisely why selling the service is a more stable business model than selling copies.

      (You can't copy goods either, you can only make new competing goods, but these particular goods are very easy for other people to make. In a fair market with no government-enforced monopolies, you wouldn't be able to sell copies for much more than the cost of making them, at least not for long.)

      Actual program you get : immaterial goods, which is why you can copy them.

      There is no such thing. If it can be copied like that, it's not a good.

      The program is information: not an actual thing, just an attribute of a thing. It's no more a "good" than the speed of light or the color red. A red piece of paper is a good, but red itself is not, no matter how much work you put into mixing the perfect shade of red.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    176. Re:What do you expect? by severoon · · Score: 1

      If it takes money (over $13,000 since January so far) then how does it make it economically worthless?

      Again, I'm not making a qualitative judgment, but $13k for nearly a year of sales is small potatoes...it's not like you're going to retire on that. Not that it's a bad deal—I'd love to have that extra bit of money for something I did, for sure...but it's incidental income. (More relevant to this discussion, why have the customers you've got paid you? Is it just that there's no place to steal it, or they otherwise would have?)

      So for something cutting edge like my program, I have little to fear, it's not just about anyone who could do something like this, and if they could they'd be stupid to give it up for free.

      You're missing the point...you're looking at it from an emotional standpoint of having a dog in the fight. From a standpoint of purely rational analysis, if something can be had for no money, the value the economy is assigning that item is zero. Any amount paid for it over zero is inefficiency in the market, and if we accept that optimal markets are efficient markets... (Again, notwithstanding ethical and legal issues.)

      The way a rational actor that is aware of this system works is by adjusting pricing to correspond with the valuation assigned to the item by the market. That way, there's no inefficiency, and no friction between seller and buyer. Example: if cable providers charged you on a per-show basis, you'd go out of your way to reduce the number of shows you watch (or that are measured, more like). So if you could watch the Daily Show on your TV and pay, or you could set up your computer to download it and transfer it to your DVR and watch it for free, you'd do the latter. Pricing of cable doesn't work this way, however, because that would be assigning value to a show that is economically worthless. What is not worthless to consumers is the service of providing easy access to the show. Consumers pay for cable because it's the service of easy delivery to their screen that they value, and so the cable company charges them for it.

      What I've said so far seems reasonable unless you ask: if the service is valuable to the consumer but the individual shows are not, that would seem to imply that all shows are created equal, which we know is not true. Yet, what seems to come out of this economic model is that, if all shows are equally worthless to the consumer and only service is valued, then as long as the service is delivered the consumer will continue to pay...which we know is not true. So for this to be right there must be some actor in the mix that places more value on the Daily Show than other shows.

      Indeed this is true. To advertisers, all shows are not created equal. Because TDS gets more viewers, it is worth more to that market. How much more? Easy, just look at ad rates.

      It's a bit counter-intuitive, and again, you have to be willing to divorce your own value judgments about things from your economic understanding of them to make sense of it, but that's how it works.

      Dude, I work hard and make half the minimum salary. It won't be hard to find people who make ten times what I do while working less hard.

      I disagree. I'm sure you believe you work very hard compared to other people, but again, these kinds of subjective judgments have no place in economics. Let's look at what you've written from a dispassionate standpoint informed by economics...

      Every day when I wake up and go to work, I am presented with a choice. I can (a) go to a job where I make X dollars with Y effort, or I could (b) go to a different job where I make 10*X for <Y effort. Every morning, I choose (a). If this is really what you mean to say, then I'd say that you're crazy. Why not do less work for 10 times the money if that option exists?

      In fact, that option does not exist, or I'm sure you'd take it. The reason you d

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    177. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume that the value to the market is the same as the value to the creator.

      When I make a creative work (e.g. a piece of code), I generally do it for fun. It therefore has a high value to me, but likely zero value to the market. If someone wants to pay me for what I produce, that's great, but it's certainly auxilerary to the original intent of the production.

      The same goes for many other artists who do it as a hobby, rather than as a profession. They create because the process and the end product have high value for them, and their decision to create is not always impacted by whether the end product is valuable to others.

      Your logic therefore only concerns certain situations, and conveniently ignores other real-world situations in which it does not apply

    178. Re:What do you expect? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Do you really expect me to read all of that?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    179. Re:What do you expect? by severoon · · Score: 1

      Nope...it's clear I'm not going to convince you, so that response is to convert everyone else to my way of thinking. ;-)

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  34. AVG not a free for all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    AVG is only for home use - even educational institutions have to buy it.

    Will you get fired for non installing illegal software? Probably not.

    Only install legit software or you are complicit.

  35. WinZip by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Who the hell uses a crappy shareware version (let alone a crappy paid-for software) for zipping? I mean, Office I can barely understand if the company runs some proprietary document management server like Citrix, but there is no excuse not to use 7-zip.

  36. 7zip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it may be one of those MSDN keys that everyone has. Use 7zip instead of WinZip.

  37. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employme by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

    I agree - ethical, legal, or not, they'll find a way to get rid of you. Or at least make working there so intolerable you quit (better for them, btw, so I'd expect this). So secure another job or be ready to tough it out until you do.

    But yes, as much as I hate them, it's time to document, document, document and then call the BSA. Your business is blatantly violating licensing terms. Declaring compliance by fiat - aka, "we don't pirate software, therefore violating the license terms isn't piracy" - is somewhat like trying to declare yourself a virgin when you're already pregnant.

  38. Deserving by jamienk · · Score: 0, Troll

    When the lamb has struggled so long and hard to get food fight illness and brave the elements, don't you think it deserves to not be killed by the lion? WinZip, that succulent little lamb, will be eaten by us, the vicious software pirates, however we moralize. It is our nature.

  39. undoing redundant mod by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    interface is shit

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:undoing redundant mod by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I also hate those stupid "choosing an item in the list equals submitting said choice".

      Choosing something in a list is one step, submitting your choice is another.

    2. Re:undoing redundant mod by adolf · · Score: 1

      I still use the classic, non-AJAX comment viewer. Works just like it used to, and is very infrequent in its annoyances while moderating.

  40. Not that big of a deal by stim · · Score: 1

    Make sure you have written documentation expressing your concern, then move on. Then if they ever just royally screw you over, you can tell on them!

    --
    Browse at -1 to keep an eye out for abuses.
  41. run away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Polish resume and begin looking for work elsewhere. Either they're willing to risk prosecution for profit or else they are doing so poorly your job isn't that secure anyway. If you otherwise like them, you could suggest open source alternatives, but the way you've presented it, it smells bad.

  42. Business is business by kentrel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tell your boss that this is important, and that the company needs to pay for it, and you feel obligated to report it as you will be liable also. Then offer helpful suggestions as to who you can lay off in order to allocate money to pay for the software. Will it be friendly Bob, or the pregnant lady in the accounts department? Alternatively you can just shut your mouth and get another job like everybody else said.

    1. Re:Business is business by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      In what world could he be liable for the company's/management's actions? That's not how it works. It sounds to me like he's an IT grunt, and has no power other than warning management about possible pirated software. If the hammer falls, it will fall on them, not him.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    2. Re:Business is business by Imrik · · Score: 1

      "We didn't know anything about it, it's all the IT grunt's doing."

    3. Re:Business is business by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  43. Copyright Infringement != Piracy by AP31R0N · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't play their game.

    Piracy is ship to ship armed robbery. Unless this company is boarding a ship full of software with cutlasses drawn... it isn't piracy. Calling infringement piracy makes it seem worse than it is and makes light of what is happening off the coast of Africa.

    Cue the descriptivists....

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    1. Re:Copyright Infringement != Piracy by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Eh. Word usage changes over time. You can only do so much to put that genie back in the bottle no matter how much you'd like to.

      You did know what he meant by using the word piracy, right?

    2. Re:Copyright Infringement != Piracy by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      Cue the descriptivists....

      Eh. Word usage changes over time.

      I didn't expect that to work! Can AP31R0N cue blackjack and hookers next?

    3. Re:Copyright Infringement != Piracy by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      i'm working on it!

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    4. Re:Copyright Infringement != Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy_(media)

      Languages change. Get used to it.

    5. Re:Copyright Infringement != Piracy by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Word change isn't the issue.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    6. Re:Copyright Infringement != Piracy by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Eh. Word usage changes over time. You can only do so much to put that genie back in the bottle no matter how much you'd like to.

      You did know what he meant by using the word piracy, right?

      You're failing to distinguish normal drift from the BSA's attempts to associate infringement with violently attacking of ships at sea. It isn't piracy until you start taking heads.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:Copyright Infringement != Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grow up you retard. nobody gives a fuck about your sad little pedantic war on what you call theft

    8. Re:Copyright Infringement != Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Words have multiple meanings.

  44. Document... by Jawn98685 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We've been over this ground many times.
    Document (as in "make sure the decision maker is aware of it") the need for an audit of software licenses. If they refuse to permit that, cover your ass as best you can and start looking for another job.
    If they permit the audit, do it. If you come up short in the licenses-to-installed copies ratio, document that. If they refuse to mitigate (buy licenses or delete installations) cover your ass as best you can and look for another job.
    It is your job to make the decision makers aware of the licensing terms, show them how the organization is or is not in compliance with those terms, and to educate them as to the consequences of failing to comply. If you are not allowed, at the very minimum, to do these things, rest assured that it will be you who is blamed when that willful negligence comes back to bite the organization. Cover your ass and get the documentation that shows you at least tried to get them to do the right thing.

  45. I don't have all the answers for you, but... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

    I don't have all the answers for you, but at least try not use shareware. Try to use freeware if you can help it. For instance, WinZip used to be good may be ten years ago, but now there are many much better, and easier to use, freeware alternatives (thought, out of all those candidates, you'll have to read their licenses to make sure the one you select is pure freeware. These days, there are many shareware programs that falsely advertise themselves as freeware).

    1. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by DJ+Particle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, Windows (since XP), Mac (since Tiger), and Ubuntu have .zip creation and extraction built in. WinZip is a dinosaur at this point.

    2. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      OSX had .zip compression from day 1 IIRC.

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    3. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by Supergibbs · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you need other formats, use 7-Zip. Supports almost everything and is free.

      --
      First post! (just in case I am...)
    4. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

      actually, windows (at least in XP) zip support is a complete and utter travesty. winzip is a vast improvement. that said, there are free alternatives (i like 7zip at home, dunno what its commercial license is). even downloading cygwin and using teaching users to use command line unzip is an improvement upon windows zip support.

    5. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by __aamnbm3774 · · Score: 1

      or use 7-Zip which is free (even for corporate use) and opens everything I've ever needed.

    6. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Admittedly, I haven't used XP in a while, but I have found that it's inbuilt unzipping capabilities are actually pretty good. They're slow, but they integrate into the UI nicely, and have several useable options on the right-click context menu.

      That said, I've used my mother's Vista-based laptop, and my gaming laptop is running Windows 7, and they're both *much* improved over XP, in terms of features as well as speed.

      7-zip is nice, but I haven't had to install it in quite some time, and neither of the Windows-based laptops that I've used have any kind of after-market unzipping software installed at all. Everything that's downloaded is either in .zip or a self-extracting archive. (the ability to create an SEA is one option that's missing in Windows, but it's honestly that that missed, particularly when it's able to create .zip archives, and everything out there can read those, even my smart phone.)

    7. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by GIL_Dude · · Score: 1

      Windows Vista and Windows 7 won't allow you to create a password protected zip file though. (Windows XP will - you can "add password" after creating it). I personally just use Windows to do zip files for the most part - but at work we have some annoying "work preventer" software that won't let us send many types of file in zip files unless we password protect the zip file (preventing the scanner from scanning inside them).

      For situations that need a password protected zip you either need to stay with XP (not a good idea long term) or use a third-party utility like WinZip, 7-Zip, or one of the others mentioned above.

    8. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Didn't Microsoft license and use Winzip code for the built in XP zip support?

    9. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      How is ZIP support in XP a "travesty"?

      You open a ZIP file by double-clicking on it. It opens like a regular folder in Windows Explorer.

      You create a ZIP file by either 1) copying-pasting a file into the ZIP "folder" or 2) Right-clicking on a file or folder and clicking "Send To -> Compressed (zipped) folder"

      How is having people download cygwin and running unzip an "improvement" over double-clicking?

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    10. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      There is an arbitrary file size limit to the XP zip - and there are no dialog boxes to inform you of this limit until your file is corrupted.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    11. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

      in XP...if you just have an isolated ZIP file and need to navigate to it...it's slow, but perhaps manageable. If, however, you have multiple files in a single folder, especially if any of them are large, and you make the mistake of navigating to that folder in explorer with the folder sidebar open...much pain and suffering (aka waiting) ensues. given that i generally have a fairly large "downloads" directory which i use not infrequently, i've always found that I have to turn the zip integration off in order to get a reasonable response from my computer. perhaps they improved things in Vista and/or 7, I've only had cursory experience with either. but i find the speed of the XP implementation unacceptable. beyond the speed, though, i would also have the quibble that they only go halfway towards treating the zip file as a folder. On the one hand, they present it as though it's a folder, but then they prevent you from doing actions that you can do in regular folders. If you didn't notice you were in a zip folder, you can be caught off guard...'wtf won't this work?!?' until you realize you're in a zip folder. this is probably b/c the zip format makes it difficult to support regular folder operations...which is well and good, but then why present a misleading paradigm to the user if it's not one you can fully support? I think they would have done better to not make it look like a folder (which it isn't) but something different (which it is). You can still have good native integration and support for something without trying to make different things look kinda-sorta-all-the-same.

    12. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by broggyr · · Score: 1

      dunno what its commercial license is

      From 7-zip's own help file:

      Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):
      Can I use 7-Zip in a commercial organization?
      Yes, 7-Zip is free software. You can use it on any computer. You don't need to register or pay for 7-Zip.
      ~~
      Note: You can use 7-Zip on any computer, including a computer in a commercial organization. You don't need to register or pay for 7-Zip.

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    13. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Admittedly, I haven't used XP in a while, but I have found that it's inbuilt unzipping capabilities are actually pretty good. They're slow, but they integrate into the UI nicely, and have several useable options on the right-click context menu.

      XP's built-in unzipping is ridiculously slow if you have large zip archives containing many files. 7-Zip integrates just as well, runs much faster, and is free.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    14. Re:I don't have all the answers for you, but... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I've had problems with it opening .rar files sometimes (invalid CRC was the latest), the same files opened OK in winrar.

      I hate .rar files.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  46. Protect yourself? by SocPres · · Score: 1
    First, don't post the question using what looks like a username alias for your real name.

    Second, don't mention the specific software in question.

    Third, find a new job quickly now that this information is out.

    I'm not a lawyer, but isn't the idea behind a corporation such that individuals are not held legally responsible for crap like this, but the company as a whole is?

    1. Re:Protect yourself? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I'm not a lawyer, but isn't the idea behind a corporation such that
      > individuals are not held legally responsible for crap like this, but
      > the company as a whole is?

      Not in the USA. The idea behind a limited liability corporation is that the liability of the shareholders is limited to the total amount of their investments: if the company goes bust, is liquidated, and there isn't enough money to pay off all the bills the shareholders lose everything they've put in but don't have to sell their homes and cough up the remainder. It lets you buy stock in a company and be sure that all you have at risk is the $10000 you paid for the stock. That's all. The law does not treat employees of a corporation differently than those of a proprietorship.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  47. Who's Watching the Watchers? by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

    I worked for a company eight years ago that bought a software company. They were all about getting tough on piracy that they created a task forced headed by the top legal counsel in the company. In meetings, they talked about the steps they took, smacking down pirates.

    Everyone of those anti-piracy motherfuckers were just as bad as the people who they were cracking down. They all traded cracked copies of shit out of the meeting. I didn't think it was that bad until I was at work late one night. The head counsel visited my desk, asked for a cracked copy of photoshop, then borrowed one of my photoshop books. No joke.

    This company is still in business today. I don't know if those people are still there, but they ran that small software division into the ground.

    The funny thing, that's when I started posting on Slashdot. Jesus Christ, I can't believe I've been visiting the same web site for eight years. I need a life.

  48. I don't think that means what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, I don't understand you. You were trying to explain how endangering one's job to avoid engaging in unethical behavior is a cowardly thing to do?

  49. boo freakin hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about you stop being such a whiney baby. pirated software?! oh no! this is computer land, proprietary software be damned. get over it.

  50. My mom always said... by eeth · · Score: 0

    Nobody likes a tattle-tale.

    --
    "believe in my innocence and I might consider yours." -- charles bukowski "Scientific progress goes 'boink'?" -- Calvin
  51. CYA, new job, then rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Firstly, start looking for a new job. It sounds like there's a fair amount of corruption at your company and that can't be good in the long term.

    As you start getting a good idea that you can find a better job, send an email to your boss expressing concern that there may be unlicensed software installed on computers in your company. Don't make a big deal about it, since this is your CYA measure. You probably will not get a response or just get a verbal response. Print this email out and keep it, along with any replies.

    After you have your job offer, say your goodbyes. Optionally, you can drop a dime to the BSA and rat out your old employers. Be careful about this last step, however, because this last step might kill your old company and everybody there will be out of a job.

  52. FOSS fish or cut bait by tjstork · · Score: 0

    This is where the FOSS people need to fish or cut bait. On one hand you might not believe that software should be something you pay for, but on the other, you want genuinely FOSS systems to succeed. In my mind, the choice is clear cut. The guy should do what I did. If you don't want to pay for Windows + Office, then switch to Linux. You have to respect Microsoft's IP.

    Granted, what MS does is pretty stupid. The more they clamp down on licensing, the more users will bolt.

    --
    This is my sig.
  53. I'm getting an enourmous kick out of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suddenly piracy is a bad thing on slashdot? What happened to all the arguments that copying software is not stealing? What happened to all the arguments that piracy is great for software companies? I guess it's one of those things that's only bad when other people do it.

    1. Re:I'm getting an enourmous kick out of this by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Same with the sanctimonious "music piracy is copyright infringement, it's not theft or stealing", blah blah blah.

    2. Re:I'm getting an enourmous kick out of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder where all the "Infinity Ward sucks for not providing dedicated servers for Modern Warfare 2" people are. More than half the copies of CoD 4 that use the servers are pirated, according to IW. So, Modern Warfare 2 comes along, and no servers - what a surprise! Yet people around here claim game piracy is not a problem, but somehow business software piracy is.

      Software piracy sucks, no matter how you spin it.

    3. Re:I'm getting an enourmous kick out of this by Chameleon+Man · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse ethics with law. While one may believe that all software should be free, the government says that the software owner deserves a huge sum of money because you illegally used their software that they intended to get paid for. It's the difference between "what should be" and "what is". That's assuming that you believe free software is the ethical choice. Some may assume the other way around.

    4. Re:I'm getting an enourmous kick out of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it is not "blah blah blah" - and it, contrary to your misguided belief is not used to justify piracy mos of the time. It is pointing out the facts to ignorant asshats who like to muddy the issues. That's all. It isn't conspiratorial, it's just factually correct that piracy is piracy (is copyright infringement), and not theft of any kind.

  54. Dragon Naturally Speaking by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I dunno about bootleg software, but on the next Talk Like A Pirate Day I'd love to put my computer in "Arrrgggg, Matey" mode.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  55. Report them to the Business Software Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can remain anonymous and collect money for reporting depending on a variety of factors:
    https://reporting.bsa.org/usa/home.aspx

  56. All I can say is.. by Guiness+Boy · · Score: 1

    CYA, CYA, CYA. Document the crap out of your findings and suggestions to Management. If they don't listen then you have proof that you informed them of their evil ways. Then you can jump ship and call the SBA. Personally, I made it my job to uninstall every piece of illegal software in my organization. People didn't like it. People complained. But included in my job description was "ensuring the proper use of software". So, that's what I did. I became the BOFH very quickly.

  57. Ethics in general by mkawick · · Score: 1

    At this point, you feel a little queasy, but probably not enough to quit your job... it probably doesn't seem like a big enough deal over which to quit. But, your boss is demonstrating that he does not feel queasy which means that if this trend continues, you may be doing something very unseemly for him before you know it. Ethics is a hard one because you need to work and minor offenses that your boss approves don't really reflect on you, right? You are doing what you are told and you even wrote something on Slashdot which should help clear you conscience.

    That fact is that all companies do some unethical things (which is why companies should be highly regulated IMHO). We should consider what it really means though for you to follow orders in this case.

    First, you are validating your bosses bad behavior and in effect telling him that he's doing a good job.
    Second, you are encouraging other people to copy software.
    Third, you are not taking a stand and demonstrating to others that your own ethics might be less-than-stellar.

    Lastly, there is the legal issue. You might just go to jail.

    Other than quitting, you can simply find out the costs, present them to your boss as a plan for upgrade, and give it to him every few weeks. That way, you are taking initiative, demonstrating that you care, and showing that most software doesn't really cost very much. Also, encouraging the company to use open source might just push him toward being more ethical and get you a promotion.

  58. Screw Him Before He Screws You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's easy for your boss to screw others, and even a cheap WinZip is too much to pay, how hard is it for him to screw you too? Find a job where you don't have to be constantly watching your back.

  59. Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Quit your job
    2. Report company to BSA
    3. ???
    4. PROFIT!

  60. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employme by pluther · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is somewhat like trying to declare yourself a virgin when you're already pregnant.

    You mean, somebody's likely to start a religion around his company?

    --
    If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
  61. Paper trail will prevail by superdx · · Score: 1

    Sometimes companies do have valid licenses (usually purchased in bulk) but no one has any idea where they are and what the heck happened to the software keys. Not every company is blessed with IT departments or people - so from their point of view, they paid for it, and they just use whatever method they can to get it working, this is especially true on the other side of the world where calling the local Microsoft or vendor office won't get you much help. And no way they are going to call a US hot-line to get it resolved

    In a local court of law, especially one where software rights are acknowledged, sometimes the actual software and license key is irrelevant as long as the paper trail holds up

  62. BSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can always report them to the Business Software Alliance (At your own risk)...however I think the biggest problem with your winzip situation is that you are using nagware for a feature that is now a built in feature in windows. Your best bet is to make some sort of written statement to your supervisor, documenting the problem so that you can't be the proverbial sacrificial lamb.

  63. maybe I've been lucky by v1 · · Score: 1

    but my policy on this is to not install pirated/mislicensed software. In three IT jobs, none of them have pushed me to "just do it anyway", but maybe I'm just fortunate that way.

    That being said, about 50% of the time they just got one of my coworkers to do it instead, and quit asking me to pirate things for them. And about 20% of the time they actually bought the software, found a free alternative, or did without.

    It'd take a pretty stupid manager to press such an issue to the point of firing you. That'd make for an entertainingly short discussion at your unemployment review, and would start a rather heavy boulder rolling.

    The new windows tech here is having quite an annoying time trying to sort out all the pirated software that the previous tech was using. He too refuses to help with piracy, and I've simply advised him to tell the managers here we need to buy xxx. And if they say we already have it, just point out it's pirated and we can't use it. I don't think they'll have a problem with replacing the pirated software with legit. I'm glad I don't work somewhere where the CIO is a "pirate wherever you can to save a buck".

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:maybe I've been lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever I've had someone ask me to install pirated software, family or coworker, I find them a FOSS alternative and say "I can't install that for you, because we don't own it, but I'll install this program that does the same thing instead." Which usually satisfies them. Occasonily I get asked "Why gimp instead of photoshop?" Or "Why OpenOffice instead of Microsoft office?" And the answer is "GIMP/OpenOffice is free, I'll install Photoshop/MSOffice after you buy the program for x00$", and they take GIMP, OpenOffice, or whatever other alternative I've given them. What they really want is to get things done, they don't care about the software they use to do it.

  64. Track it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Track the licenses in a database. Delete all the illegal copies you find. Start filling out purchase orders when someone asks you for their software back.

  65. You are what you do... by eepok · · Score: 0

    I'm not talking about your job. I'm talking about the decisions you make. If you do something illegal, you're a criminal. There are various levels of "criminal", but you're a criminal nonetheless. Even deeper than that, if you do something you know to be unethical, then you are unethical. Is that how you want to describe yourself... if even only to yourself?

    Here's what I would do: Install the software once and voice your concerns. If you get fired, you have a rock-solid case. If they ask "Why'd you install it in the first place?" you respond, "I was under duress and the first thing I think about is supporting my family. After further thought, I'd rather be a family man who refuses to compromise his ethics and morals even if it means I'd be let go than one who hasn't any worth standing up for."

    I'm not saying it's easy to do, think about which person you'd rather be.

    On a related topic, businesses really need to embrace freeware. Open Office, Thunderbird, 7-zip, and the like would save massive amounts of money on licensing. Of course, some IT depts are too swamped with work to become sufficiently adept with the new software so that they feel comfortable distributing it around the network. For example: my IT department will not allow Firefox to be installed because the last report they were able to create (around version 1.0) showed Firefox as being HIPAA non-compliant. It has, however, been HIPAA compliant since, like, 1.0001.

    One department finally junked Eudora and is adopting Thunderbird as their default mail client instead of Outlook. That's expected to save quite a bit.

  66. Seems like consensus by kiwimate · · Score: 0, Troll

    Everyone is saying dob them in because they're dishonest/lacking ethics/etc., and nobody is calling you out on calling it piracy rather than copyright infringement. I wish the average slashdotter was so upstanding when it came to discussions on pirating music and movies.

    Seriously...what's the difference?

    1. Re:Seems like consensus by dave562 · · Score: 1

      The difference is that there are over a million /. uids. While one subset is all for pirating music and movies, there is another subset that is against software piracy.

    2. Re:Seems like consensus by eepok · · Score: 1

      It's based on the assumption that the individual doesn't have the money to buy the things (software, entertainment media) they're told they need due to inequitable income or pricing structures while also assuming companies definitely have that money. That of course stems from the philosophy (or at least subconscious mode of action that demonstrates the belief) that if something is needed but cannot be obtained legally, it's acceptable to obtain that thing illegally. (Strain theory derivative)

  67. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employme by Verteiron · · Score: 1

    Declaring compliance by fiat ... is somewhat like trying to declare yourself a virgin when you're already pregnant.

    Hey, it worked at least once. Maybe the CEO is trying to start a new religion.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  68. the big O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Larry Elison can be such a dick when it comes to the old software piracy question. He;s always saying, "oh, im sure we paid for all of our microsoft products."

  69. sad, but everyhwere is like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    every single company I have ever worked at uses pirated software... and sometimes a lot of it. you're going to be hard pressed to find a company that doesn't.. in my experience...

    I worked at one place that had a mirror of usenet servers and got everything pirated.

    1. Re:sad, but everyhwere is like this by syrinx · · Score: 2, Informative

      And everywhere I've worked has been 100% legit. Maybe you should stop working for criminals? Just a thought.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    2. Re:sad, but everyhwere is like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you need to stop being an elitist privileged capitalist and and violating the human rights of everybody with a lower class and GDP than yourself.

  70. WinZip? Really??? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    If you're so concerned about CYA, why don't you install any of the freeware alternatives to WinZip that blow the freakin' doors off it? It would take you all of ten seconds at a site like SnapFiles or MajorGeeks to track one down. Same with any other shareware that concerns you.

    You could also suggest freeware alternatives for the pirated stuff, along with the advantages of being able to update the stuff.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  71. Are you *really* sure about this? by pizzap · · Score: 1

    You know software like Adobe Acrobat has licenses where you can use the key multiple times? Are you really sure there isn't an invoice about 20 office licenses somewhere in a file?

    Because If you decide to take this to the law and you're wrong.. you are the offender.

  72. Similar question... by audiophile8706 · · Score: 1

    I quit a job back in april with one of main reasons being their blatant use (or misuse) of unlicensed software. Especially in regards to pirated XP and Office 2007. (In an effort to "make things right" they were trying to install student editions in place of the pirated copies). I was directed several times to install this software, and just plain forced to if I dared to object to the usage.

    Unless they cleaned up their act a lot in the last 7 months (which I highly doubt), would it be smart to contact the BSA?

  73. CYA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send the CEO an email detailing your concerns. "Follow up to our conversation", "please advise where the licenses are kept" and "thanks for taking the time to clear this up" - keep it very professional, you're trying to help, you're not accusing. He'll probably reply to you by e-mail (I'd bet on it). Print out both letters and file them away safely.

  74. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not be the disgruntled ex-employee that rats out the company to the BSA and gets a cut? Sure you'll be a tool, but you'll be the tool with a new Z4.

  75. 7 simple guidelines... by James+McP · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The best case scenario is that you can migrate them to free software and be hailed a hero. Don't expect it though. Here are the best of the many ideas I've seen posted to slashdot on this recurring topic.

    1. Consider putting a lawyer on retainer. Not as expensive as you might think and an hour or so's conversation can ensure that you document all the appropriate recommendations to keep you out of the BSA's sights and do so in a legally admissible fashion.

    2. Don't make it look like a crusade so avoid being confrontational. i.e. "We need to find out who uses $software_package so we can put upgrades/support in next year's budget" or "Investigate free-for-commercial-use $kind_of_software to avoid budgeting needs entirely"

    3. Document any time you bring it up with your boss. Use email or written word as much as possible. BCC an external email address and/or take backups of your exchanges home. (again, see #1 for region-specific laws)

    4. Any time you are given a verbal pat on the head, do an email follow up later and if at all possible put the responsibility of license management on them. "I installed Office on the 2 new-hires' PCs. We have $quantity copies of Office installed to date. Let me know when we are getting close to our license limit as I may be able to remove the software from $clueless_user's PC."

    5. List any of your little victories as fiscal savings during reviews or status reports. "Have replaced Adobe Acrobate Suite with $freeware_PDF_exporter, which will lower our licensing overhead by $250/user and allowed for widespread distribution"

    6. Be prepared to be thrown under the bus. Companies willing to operate unethically are, by definition, unethical. Even if you never report them to the BSA, someone else might and you, as the IT guy, may be thrown to the wolves. Having that documentation of all the times that the CFO/CEO was stated to be in charge of license management and that you had no knowledge of the licensing limits, plus the fact they knew how many instances of software will at least ensure you get your unemployment and that the BSA won't come after you.

    7. If you report them to the BSA, make sure to get the bounty and put your lawyer on notice. The BSA has a vested interest in concealing their informants, but stuff can come out and unethical people do unethical things. They often say or do things that are defamatory in the process. Whistleblower laws should ensure you can get compensation for lost wages, compensation for defamation, damage to career, etc.

    --
    I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
    1. Re:7 simple guidelines... by eepok · · Score: 1

      Brilliant advice.

  76. What is your job description? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Point it out to the authorities if you want, but IMO, if license management is not a part of your job description, then just install the software as you're told. If ever asked, you can simply state that you brought the subject of license control up previously with your superiors and they informed you that they do have the proper licenses for everything. You're not going to be legally accountable for it - the company and its management is. If you ARE in management, then what the hell are you still doing with the company?

  77. Talk to legal by eli867 · · Score: 1

    If the boss won't listen, perhaps you're talking to the wrong person. This company have a legal department? Talk to them and point out the potentially cripplingly liability that the company is subjecting itself to by using pirated software.

    I'd start looking for a new job, regardless. The kind of company that is fine with cutting some illegal corners to get the job done is not a good place to work.

  78. Collect evidence, look for another job, and then by puddles · · Score: 1

    and then it's every man for himself. You want to protect your own butt so you might want to be the first to call the BSA. You'll want to do this so the people at previous company doesn't frame you for it.

  79. You've violated the licensing yourself now by ldcroberts · · Score: 1

    You just admitted you typed the CD-keys of software into google. Google doesn't do anything to keep what people search for hidden, in fact they go out of their way to publish it. Sure it's hard to find things that are only searched for once, but I'm certain that sharing the CD-Keys with a third party - even google - is prohibited by the license agreement

    1. Re:You've violated the licensing yourself now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if he agreed to the license in the first place.

  80. Send this link... by grub · · Score: 1


    Send this very informative link to your management. Don't Copy that Floppy!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  81. Be Proactive by claykarmel · · Score: 1

    Write a brief (1 to 2 page) plan for the CEO about how to 'better manage' licenses on company computers. The plan should focus on incremental improvement (what to install on new computers, what to install when asked on existing computers).

    Have the plan oriented to save money and reduce obligations of share ware. Give a few options, but don't preach about software philosophy.

    Advise the CEO, NOT IN WRITING, of some of your concerns for legacy computers, and show him that you're committed to continuous improvement in this area. Remind him that the BSA wields a heavy hammer, and to be mindful of angry ex-employees who might take advantage.

    CEO's like plans with no immediate funding requirement, low stress on the organization, and continuous improvement. Write your plan assuming the BSA will eventually read it - that is, don't incriminate yourself or the company.

  82. Let me get past the easy comments... by HikingStick · · Score: 5, Informative
    There are already tons of posts saying either "document it" or "find another job". Here's what I recommend.

    1. Take a software inventory. Figure out what is installed where, and which license codes/CD keys are being used.
    2. Pull records. We get a lot of our PCs pre-loaded with MS apps and Acrobat. Those OEM installs stay with the machines, though many places try to move them forward from machine to machine (thus creating the impression that "we must have bought it sometime").
    3. Check online sites, like Microsoft's eOpen site, or contact specific vendors (e.g., call Autodesk or your VAR) and ask them to send you a summary of your current licenses.
    4. Document your level of usage against your level of compliance. Include all costs for becoming compliant. Be sure to include one time costs (e.g., buying additional seats) and any recurring costs (e.g., maintenance, back maintenance, reinstatement fees).
    5. Educate management that software is licensed, not purchased.
    6. Include information regarding the legal liability related to pirated software. Include references to any cases you can find, including actual fines, as well as potential fines (caps). Note the reputational risk to the company as well.
    7. Prepare a plan for bringing the company into compliance. Include possible stop-gap measures and alternatives (e.g., limiting the number of users with a specific pieces of software, buying one additional license per year, using OpenOffice).
    8. Compile everything into a well-documented report/memo (depending on your company's preferred style), and be sure to present it personally (don't just email it off). Offer to meet at another time, if necessary, but you must make it clear how important this is. Offer to meet with the entire management team. Communicate, communicate, communicate.
    9. Let management know you don't plan on blowing the whistle (they'll surely say "nobody knows, so we're fine"), but make them aware that any disgruntled employee could make a call in to the piracy hotline. If you have the intestinal fortitude to do so, you could even make it clear (if it reflects your beliefs) that you value your integrity and that you cannot, in good conscience, help the company steal software/violate contract terms. Of course, that means you need to be ready to put up or shut up.

    All that being well and good, you can take some practical steps to start getting things into compliance going forward:
    • Commit to buying licenses for all new software requests.
    • Keep good inventory records of hardware (and associated OEM software) and software.
    • Start buying machines with appropriate OEM software (if small enough where volume licensing doesn't make sense), and consider buying shrink-wrap software on the same order (this might let the financial eggheads depreciate the entire purchase - IANATA)
    • Adopt free software that is not limited to home/personal/educational use, like Comodo Internet Security and OpenOffice.
    • Pray you don't get audited.
    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    1. Re:Let me get past the easy comments... by SirWhoopass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of the best responses I've seen, although you probably won't get modded up. The only item I would add is that, in researching, the accounting department is a good place to go. They likely will not have license keys or other details, but are very likely to be able to tell you what was actually purchased, when, and from whom.

    2. Re:Let me get past the easy comments... by SeximusMaximus · · Score: 1

      There are already tons of posts saying either "document it" or "find another job". Here's what I recommend. 1. Take a software inventory. Figure out what is installed where, and which license codes/CD keys are being used. 2. Pull records. We get a lot of our PCs pre-loaded with MS apps and Acrobat. Those OEM installs stay with the machines, though many places try to move them forward from machine to machine (thus creating the impression that "we must have bought it sometime"). 3. Check online sites, like Microsoft's eOpen site, or contact specific vendors (e.g., call Autodesk or your VAR) and ask them to send you a summary of your current licenses. 4. Document your level of usage against your level of compliance. Include all costs for becoming compliant. Be sure to include one time costs (e.g., buying additional seats) and any recurring costs (e.g., maintenance, back maintenance, reinstatement fees). 5. Educate management that software is licensed, not purchased. 6. Include information regarding the legal liability related to pirated software. Include references to any cases you can find, including actual fines, as well as potential fines (caps). Note the reputational risk to the company as well. 7. Prepare a plan for bringing the company into compliance. Include possible stop-gap measures and alternatives (e.g., limiting the number of users with a specific pieces of software, buying one additional license per year, using OpenOffice). 8. Compile everything into a well-documented report/memo (depending on your company's preferred style), and be sure to present it personally (don't just email it off). Offer to meet at another time, if necessary, but you must make it clear how important this is. Offer to meet with the entire management team. Communicate, communicate, communicate. 9. Let management know you don't plan on blowing the whistle (they'll surely say "nobody knows, so we're fine"), but make them aware that any disgruntled employee could make a call in to the piracy hotline. If you have the intestinal fortitude to do so, you could even make it clear (if it reflects your beliefs) that you value your integrity and that you cannot, in good conscience, help the company steal software/violate contract terms. Of course, that means you need to be ready to put up or shut up. All that being well and good, you can take some practical steps to start getting things into compliance going forward:

      • Commit to buying licenses for all new software requests.
      • Keep good inventory records of hardware (and associated OEM software) and software.
      • Start buying machines with appropriate OEM software (if small enough where volume licensing doesn't make sense), and consider buying shrink-wrap software on the same order (this might let the financial eggheads depreciate the entire purchase - IANATA)
      • Adopt free software that is not limited to home/personal/educational use, like Comodo Internet Security and OpenOffice.
      • Pray you don't get audited.

      Good points, making a comment so I have a reference to go back

    3. Re:Let me get past the easy comments... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      My wife, an accountant, comments - "If IT is that screwed up, what makes you think accounting is any better?".
       
      Seriously, you can have your basic annual bookkeeping and taxes straight but still be hopelessly broken in being able to keep track of stuff from further back than the current tax year. (Doubly so if they business has a bookkeeper rather than a real accountant, triply so if they outsource to a bookkeeper or accountant.)
       
      If they don't have the money to pay for licenses, or willingly cheap out and steal them, that makes me suspect that isn't the only place where management is cutting corners. Accountants cost real money, and as they are generally seen as 'support' and costing a company money rather than being a profit center, they're often underfunded and overworked.

    4. Re:Let me get past the easy comments... by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      I agree fully. I was in a similar situation (though not as severe) with my current employer, and purchasing records were a huge help.

      I was lucky that my predacessor, who handled IT duties because there was no one else at the time, put together a good system and was tracking most everything. I did find a few surprises along the way, but he made it much easier. I have had to fight battles with some consultants, though, who proposed, for example, buying license for a cloud-hosted I'm just glad management decided to side with me on keeping it all legit. I was ready to go, even though I didn't have anything lined up.

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    5. Re:Let me get past the easy comments... by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      It might be the case, but most management sees the threat of an IRS audit as much more likely than a software license audit, so there's a good chance that they are saving receipts and POs if nothing else.

      When I went through tracking down our prior technology spend, the biggest problem I found was that purchases were miscategorized. The records were there, but some items were recorded as "office supplies," while others were listed as "computers," and some were even listed with the total costs for a building project (since the new workstations and the associated software were part of the expansion). If the bookeeping is sloppy, then you're stuck starting a new system of recordkeeping and sticking to it. You might be stowed over past purchases and assumed license status, so you may end up having to pay for things a second time. That's management's fault, if they didn't see to carrying out their oversight of Accounting and IT.

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    6. Re:Let me get past the easy comments... by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1

      Certainly, accounting could be screwed too. But there odds are it isn't as bad as IT.

      If nothing else, they are required to file taxes every year. Which means somebody is putting expenses down onto paper. On top of that, computers are either on a depreciation schedule or section 179. There is no such annual requirement for IT in a small business, which is why it can get so easily forgotten.

      I would also argue that most managers are far more likely to understand that falsifying taxes is illegal than realize that installing a single-seat copy of Acrobat on 20 machines is also illegal.

    7. Re:Let me get past the easy comments... by JohnPombrio · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This is the best response I have seen. Try to take the "I know best" out of the equation. Getting hot and bothered by something that I thought was of great importance but management did not almost got me fired more than once. The one time that I could not in all justice keep my mouth shut, my boss was fired and I was "laid off" a few weeks later. By keeping your cool and treating this as you would any other IT job, you get a fair chance of fixing it without anyone getting upset. Remember, you are supposed to be an ASSET to the company, not a pain in the ass. I once heard why a manager let a talented employee go. The manager said "the guy was great in doing the job but was it just too much trouble for me to manage him". Once more, with feeling "Communicate, communicate, communicate."

    8. Re:Let me get past the easy comments... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Best post in the entire story.

      --
      Qxe4
  83. WTF? by msimm · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A call to the BSA is not something you want in your job history and it's not our duty to police and report software licenses.

    If your companies asset tracking program is that bad and it makes you that uncomfortable, by all means seek more suitable employment but if I was ever checking a reference and it was inferred that the employee had done something like this I would immediately move them off of my list. If you want to do the right thing explain the problem and if they still don't take interest you can explain this is why you'll be seeking employment elsewhere.

    Narcing for money (or revenge or misplace moral 'duty') is about as sleazy as using unlicensed software for business.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:WTF? by publiclurker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In other words, you like to hire ethically challenged people who are willing to break the law for your profit. Please tell us where you work so we know better than to be associated with such an ethically deprived individual.

    2. Re:WTF? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      But if your job is to install software, can it really be said that your job description includes breaking the law and exposing yourself to hundreds of thousands of dollars (millions?) in civil liability?

    3. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not our duty to police and report software licenses.

      Really? Because I'm looking at it right here on my job description...

      Narcing for money (or revenge or misplace moral 'duty') is about as sleazy as using unlicensed software for business.

      Bull. The opportunity to put an end to apparently rampant non-compliance was extended and rejected. If they will not come into compliance willingly, there is nothing wrong with making a bit of coin by FORCING them into compliance. Turning over a company for a minor violation out of spite is one thing. Turning over a company for sweeping and willful violation is entirely different.

      I still wouldn't do it, though. Anybody calling the BSA - or any other media or software copyright enforcement group - in on things like this is just begging for pain.

    4. Re:WTF? by msimm · · Score: 1

      I think the ethics of reporting software license violations is contentious, but the ethics of profiting from reporting possible violations when in a position of trust I find more contentious.

      This isn't whistle blowing in the classic sense and two wrongs still !== right. I'd be no more likely to hire an employee who knowingly installed unlicensed software but I do expect a level of discretion and maturity about the matter telling on someone simply does not provide.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    5. Re:WTF? by msimm · · Score: 1

      When did it become the responsibility of the citizenry to directly profit from and enforce BSA partners copyright? And if we feel it is one's moral obligation why would we exempt our friends and family? Even ourselves often?

      --
      Quack, quack.
  84. Tell the name of the company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll take care of it for you!

  85. Piracy by suryatheSun · · Score: 1

    My company is more careful about not violating OSS licenses than making sure they don't pirate any shareware

    1. Re:Piracy by natehoy · · Score: 1

      So your company sells a product and spends more time making sure that what they sell is based on valid licensing than what they use. That is a rational business decision.

      If you get caught pirating shareware (or even commercial software), the BSA will come down on you pretty hard, but generally they go easy on companies that work to comply. I mean, it's not like you shared 10 tracks on the Internet and didn't make any money. You're a for-profit business and the punishment standards are much lower than a nefarious casual music pirate.

      All jokes aside, the BSA will charge you a decent chunk of change, but it's going to work out a rational way for you to pay for what you use, and the penalties aren't going to put you out of business - they'd rather capture 10% than drive you out of business trying to capture 100%.

      On the other hand, if you are found guilty of busting licenses on stuff you are actively engaged in selling for profit, the code you are pirating can cost you a REAL chunk of sales.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:Piracy by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      That only makes any sense if you're a software development outfit.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  86. Welcome to the real world by dave562 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most small businesses have a hard time dealing with software licensing. Any money that they have to spend on software is less money for them to spend on other things like employee salaries, power bills to keep the lights on, toner for the printers, etc. It sounds to me like the OP has already shot himself in the foot by bringing it up to management.

    If pirated software really bothers you then find another job (good luck with that in this market). However ratting your employer out to the BSA is a dickhead move. Whether you like it or not, they are currently paying your salary, and the salary of at least 20 other people. The odds of them getting audited for license compliance are just about zero, unless someone rats them out.

    I'd take a long hard look at the situation. There isn't an easy answer. Either you rat out your employer and impose significant costs and lost productivity on a company in a struggling economy, or you live with being a thief for a while until you can find another job. If I were in that situation, I'd just suck it up and start looking for another job. I wouldn't cry myself to sleep if Microsoft loses out on the licensing revenue for 19 copies of Office. And I certainly wouldn't torpedo a company that is providing employment to my community just so that the BSA and Microsoft can earn a couple thousand dollars.

    1. Re:Welcome to the real world by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However ratting your employer out to the BSA is a dickhead move.

      I see you are from "don't snitch" school of thought. Well, that is a dumbass move. The company would gladly slit his throat and throw him to the BSA if they thought it would protect themselves, and you know it. He owes them nothing.

      Personally, I hope you get to be on the receiving end of the negative side of "don't snitch".

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:Welcome to the real world by dave562 · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm from the greater good school of thought. I also believe that people get what they deserve. If the company is keeping people employed then good for them. If he doesn't like it then he can leave. He doesn't have to burn the bridge on the way out.

      I have no problem getting the authorities involved when it is warranted. When my neighbor stabbed her girlfriend, I called the cops and I showed up in court to testify. I could have ignored it but I didn't.

      Calling the BSA is a dickhead move. I think the OP should offer up some suggestions about how to run the business and avoid licensing costs with FOSS. He should offer up an analysis of what it would cost the business to become compliant with the licensing for the software that they are currently using. It is one thing to see a problem and take steps to mitigate it. It is one thing to realize a problem is bigger than you are, and that you can't affect change and therefore make the decision to disengage from the situation. It's another thing entirely to take it upon yourself to bring trouble to others. Calling the BSA is bringing trouble to others. You can try to justify it through whatever morals and ethics you have, but at the end of the day you're a dick. You're causing problems for someone else. If you find yourself working for an employer and you don't like the working conditions, leave. Only an asshole trashes the place on the way out.

      Personally, I think you are a prime example of why society sucks sometimes. You'll wish ill upon others for no benefit to yourself. You wish ill on me? You don't even know me. You wish ill on some company that is providing jobs based on what some guy wrote about their attitude toward software licensing on the internet? Buddy, you've got some karma coming to you.

      For all we know the owner of the company could be driving to work in an old Volvo and doing his best to pay the interest on his small business loan just so that he can keep the doors open. Is that the kind of person you want to stick with a BSA audit? On the other hand if the owner is driving a Benz and taking the sales staff out for drinks and dinner on a weekly basis then maybe he needs a dose of reality. In that case the company probably could afford to become compliant with licenses.

      In the real world, businesses juggle expenses all the time. Where I work we have about twenty servers and about a quarter of them aren't under warranty anymore. I brought that up to my boss. There isn't any money in the budget for warranties so he decided not to renew them. He made the bet that we won't have any serious problems with the servers. Well earlier this week there was a power fluctuation. One of our servers (that was thankfully still under warranty) took a hit. Even though it was plugged into a UPS, the UPS didn't condition the power properly and the main board fried. The next day my boss decided he wanted to find money to renew the warranties on the other servers.

      To draw a parallel between the two situations... by recommending the guy call the BSA to prove a point would be like telling me that it's okay to wreck a file server to illustrate to my boss the importance of warranties. In my situation I got lucky and an act of God proved my point for me. In the case of the OP, his employer will see the light sooner or later. If they really are bad people, they will get the karma that is coming to them. But it isn't the OP's duty in life to cause problems for others.

    3. Re:Welcome to the real world by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      As near as I can tell, your version of "greater good" is "whatever benefits or doesn't hurt me".

      I wish ill upon you so that you will learn that "don't snitch" is a bad thing.

      You believe in karma? That explains a lot, as it shows you are an idiot.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:Welcome to the real world by wynler · · Score: 1

      Take for example two small companies (Alpha and Beta) of similar size both offering similar services in a community.  Alpha has made an effort to be compliant in their licensing, the Beta has not.  Since Beta has not spent the time and money to comply with licensing, it is able to provide it's services at lesser cost than Alpha.  Alpha loses customers to Beta.

      It's not just BSA and Microsoft that loses out on such a scenario. 

    5. Re:Welcome to the real world by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "And I certainly wouldn't torpedo a company that is providing employment to my community just so that the BSA and Microsoft can earn a couple thousand dollars."

      Bullshit arguments like this are the best case I've yet seen in FAVOR of calling the BSA.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    6. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure this same thought process has kept employees quiet about dioxin dumps in the local lake, working 60 hours a week on straight time, and maybe even keeping quiet about burying the potential whistleblower in some concrete.

    7. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very well said

    8. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this has some strong merit. Being someone with experience in small startup ocmpanies it can be very hard to pay employees and do everything legitamately. The majority of the US economy is small business and the majority of those companies are probably getting away with some breaks, including free software. MS I think realized this and rather than pushing small business away from them to FOSS, they created things like BizSpark and other systems where small businesses can qualify for all the free sofware they can handle.

      Yes, use as many FOSS alternatives as possible and do your best to be legit.

      Yes, if you are at a company that can easily afford licenses and isn't, try to get them into compliance.

      But, think twice about killing a startup company that may be running paycheck to paycheck to make sure they are 100% legal, especially when using software that doesn't sap any resources (because the aternative is using the free version, and doesn't make the companies money anyways, while shrinking the pool of people who like and promote their software)

      killing jobs to pay for software is not a good idea IMO, and neither is screwing over hard working programmers if you can afford to pay.

      DOCUMENT YOUR ACTIONS, cover your ass, and weigh your actions.

    9. Re:Welcome to the real world by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Most small businesses have a hard time dealing with software licensing.

      True, and it's not just the cost of buying licenses. Keeping track of licenses takes a certain amount of effort and organization. Keeping track of all the terms of individual licenses takes time and legal expertise. Performing thorough software audits can take some time and/or resources.

      The thing is, it may even be true that the submitter's boss bought a bunch of licenses for Office at some point and just misplaced them. It often isn't always even going to be clear to many end users what they need to keep in order to prove compliance. I've come into companies that swear all their software is legal, but they don't have any proof. I've even seen cases where, after digging through closets, I've found some evidence that software was actually purchased (e.g. a stack of disks) but no real paperwork.

      Part of the reason I favor FOSS is just not having to worry about that stuff. Beyond the cost, it also lets you drop any fear of being sued if you don't jump through the right draconian hoops.

    10. Re:Welcome to the real world by dave562 · · Score: 1

      If I'm an idiot, what are you besides angry? Being an agent who has a hand in the downfall of others is a bad thing. The Buddha is attributed with having said something along the lines of, "Don't take another's ills as your own. Do not become upset by the bad behaviors of others."

      The world is full of people who do bad things of varying degrees. One must be responsible for their own actions. Here's a hypothetical situation. The OP calls the BSA on his company. They fail their BSA audit and need to cough up fines and license fees. Those costs lead them to cut a position. They decide to let the new lady in accounting go because in all reality, she was a help to the company but her co-workers can pick up the slack. Now sure, the company was in the wrong for pirating software. But what gives the OP the justification for possibly costing someone else their job?

      You seem to be a strong proponent of calling the BSA. What good do you see coming from it?

    11. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go away
      you fucking shade of Gray ethical thinker
      that destroy me nice black and white world

      ps this was the most Insightful post I have read on slashdot....

    12. Re:Welcome to the real world by dave562 · · Score: 1

      You bring up a good point and I completely agree. Business is cut throat and there are always trade offs. I personally would walk away from the situation ASAP but I wouldn't call the BSA. Although my beef would be with the CEO or whoever it is that decided they didn't want to comply with licensing requirements, we all know that in the end the rest of the employees will get hurt by the audit. There will be less money for development, growth, salaries, etc.

      Yet like you mentioned, if the OP doesn't call the BSA then the rest of the companies in the same market are at a disadvantage if they are paying the full cost of the licenses. It has been my experience that very few companies in the SMB market are in compliance with software licensing. So although your argument does have some merit, I don't think it is very applicable to the real world.

      In my experience as a consultant, I'd say that 90% of new clients that we took on weren't in compliance. We worked with them to bring them into compliance. Most often it came during upgrades. If they were already paying tens of thousands of dollars for new servers and workstations, paying a little bit more for software licenses wasn't that big of a deal. Often times Microsoft was so happy that they were actually paying for the software that they would cut them big discounts on volume licenses.

    13. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use to beat people who snitch
      Now I pay Knucklehead Tony to do it

    14. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen.

    15. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However ratting your employer out to the BSA is a dickhead move.

      You are disgrace to whole Department of Technology. I am sick of the corruption and code of silence that is going on in the corporations. The company should pay the license of use FOSS or you the I.T person will be sold out by the CEO and your certificates will be taken by the BSA when the shit hits the fan.

    16. Re:Welcome to the real world by tftp · · Score: 1

      Since Beta has not spent the time and money to comply with licensing, it is able to provide it's services at lesser cost than Alpha. Alpha loses customers to Beta.

      Alpha and Beta also have 1000 other reasons to offer different prices:

      • They are in different locations, paying different taxes
      • They use different buildings, carrying different loans
      • They hire different people, resulting in different salaries
      • They use different tools, resulting in different expenses
      • They offer slightly different services, resulting in different costs
      • And so on...

      Picking s/w licenses as the only cause of different prices is ridiculous. If the company is using p1rated software then it definitely cuts other corners as well, and at any time that company may go down. The term "fly by night" applies to them, and you deal with them at your own risk.

      So, as an example, I can buy a wall clock from a seller on Amazon or Ebay, for minimal price but taking some risk. Maybe the clock will come broken; or maybe it is not what I thought it is; or maybe the seller doesn't take returns. Alternatively, I can go to a large store (like Sears) and buy the same clock there, for more money. But they will bring the clock to me, show it to me, wait while I examine and consider the clock, and package it. And there is hardly any risk, they will take the defective item back with no questions asked.

    17. Re:Welcome to the real world by pnuema · · Score: 1
      ecommending the guy call the BSA to prove a point would be like telling me that it's okay to wreck a file server to illustrate to my boss the importance of warranties.

      Bullshit. The BSA exists to help software companies. For every nice lady in accounting that gets to keep her job because her boss pirates software, some engineer gets laid off because of assholes like you.

    18. Re:Welcome to the real world by Sparton · · Score: 1

      As near as I can tell, your version of "greater good" is "whatever benefits or doesn't hurt me".

      A good portion of his argument revolves around the idea that the company is keeping other people employed, and you're saying he's the selfish one?

    19. Re:Welcome to the real world by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      A good portion of his argument is the broken window fallacy and you have just defended it.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    20. Re:Welcome to the real world by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Well following that logic, for every company that decides to adopt OSS instead of paying the Microsoft tax causes engineers to be laid off.

    21. Re:Welcome to the real world by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Good job on dodging the fact that snitching is a dickheaded move and burning the place down on the way out the door is something that only an asshole would do. You can try to pigeon hole my position into a pre-defined logical construct but it doesn't negate the truth of of it. A person with integrity will disengage from the situation. A vindictive prick will try to harm the organization.

      I don't think the OP is a vindictive prick. He's just new to the business world and facing his first situation where reality doesn't mesh with his morals. Calling the BSA is a harsh step to take. He can find another job and leave. On his way out the door he can let them know their liabilities and what a BSA audit will cost them. He can tell them that he won't be the one to call the BSA, but given the $10,000 or whatever reward... it is only a matter of time before someone else does.

      There are a lot of mature ways to handle the situation that don't involve inflicting financial hardship on the organization. Like I said in another post, I used to consult for the SMB market and about 90% of the customers we dealt with weren't in compliance with their software licenses when we took them on as clients. When I left the company, all of the clients that I was responsible for were.

      I think that the OP does need to leave in order to make the point that what is going on is wrong. There isn't any doubt about that.

    22. Re:Welcome to the real world by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Look, you stupid fuck, "snitching" is not a dickhead move. You want to know what a dickhead move is? Doing something someone can and should "snitch" on. It is committing crimes, petty or not, because you believe you are somehow better than everyone else so the rules shouldn't apply to you. People who say "dont' snitch" are saying "don't let people know I am an asshole who should not be trusted" and people who fall for that are dickheads.

      Now, shut the fuck up, dickhead.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    23. Re:Welcome to the real world by dave562 · · Score: 1

      The dickhead move is yelling at some guy on the internet who disagrees with you. I hope whatever is bottled up inside of you simmers down sometime soon. Life is too short to be so hostile.

    24. Re:Welcome to the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, you stupid fuck, "snitching" is not a dickhead move.

      Actually, it is a dickhead move and zealots like you who pretend it isn't are part of the problem. If anybody's the dickhead here it's you.

  87. 1. Report them to the BSA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2. Collect your reward.
    3. Profit.

    1. Re:1. Report them to the BSA. by SomeJoel · · Score: 1

      If only it were that easy.

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
  88. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employme by ckaminski · · Score: 1


    Declaring compliance by fiat - aka, "we don't pirate software, therefore violating the license terms isn't piracy" - is somewhat like trying to declare yourself a virgin when you're already pregnant.
    </quote>

    In 2009, one of those is a logical fallacy, and the other is technically possible.

    I'll leave it to the reader to decide which is which.

  89. BSA.org will help by ClosedEyesSeeing · · Score: 1

    Report them to BSA.org! They even have a rewards program if they net money, they'll share with you!

  90. shut up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you've said your piece, have management sign something that shows that you objected at the time but are following orders, AND KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT. you turn into a nag when you keep bringing something up. sorry, you're just an IT guy, and no, you can't control the entire company.

    looking for a job in this economy is a really bad idea, getting fired for being a know it all smart ass is even worse.

    you can certainly bring up open source alternatives, bring up the fact that pirated software usually contains trojans that will steal all of their secrets, but once you've made you case and been told what to do, leave it be. you're not going to change the world.

  91. What should you do? by d34dluk3 · · Score: 1

    Stop being a sanctimonious bitch about it. If you make a personal decision not to pirate, that's cool. Running around trying to be everyone else's conscience, not so much.

    1. Re:What should you do? by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 1

      You don't work for a living in the real world, USA, do you? You know, the one where accountants go to jail if they look the other way about bookkeeping shennanigans? The one where you can get sued for "contributory copyright infringement" for torrenting your personal music?

      If the dude is knowingly installing pirated software, he's liable. Legally, not just morally. I for damn sure will be everyone else's conscience if their lack of ethics gets me in legal trouble.

      --
      ---dragoness
    2. Re:What should you do? by d34dluk3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I do, but not as IT, so I (fortunately) am not put in these kinds of positions. (Although as an engineer, if I screw up, people can die).

      I can totally sympathize with not wanting to be in a liable position. What rubbed me the wrong way was the aura of moral superiority I was picking up. The OP seemed to be looking for problems rather than having them come to him. It's one thing if your entire office suite is pirated, but feeling upset that your boss doesn't want to pay for WinZip? Seriously?

  92. It depends on your job function... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What you SHOULD have done I think depends on what your job function is. If you are paid to be responsible for licensing issues, then yes, you should bring it up. If you are not, then you shouldn't... A regular employee shouldn't be spending their work time nosing around the issue of compliance. Imagine instead if an "I care a lot about strict building codes" software developer or secretary were looking around/inside cube partitions and discovers that the wiring is done slightly incorrectly, but not harmfully, but if directly shown to the city building inspector would force a costly change. The employee would likely be canned or shunned for sharing what amounts to an equivalent concern to the software licensing. You can debate whether the two are "equivalent" (i.e. you might think pirating software is worse than a slight building code violation), but the company/manager's opinion of the question of importance is what matters. They may likely see you as being just as bad as the person complaining about a slight building code violation.

  93. Institutionalized Software Piracy by djl4570 · · Score: 1

    This is commonplace. At the software vendor (Yeah, a business that makes money on consulting and software licensing) I used to work at back in 1994 we started rolling out Thinkpads, first to management and Sales then to other customer facing employees. Someone handed me a single copy of Act and told me to install it on ten systems. I refused. He did so himself and spread rumors that I wasn't a team player. Meanwhile the new data center manager institutionalized software piracy. We had a single copy of MS Project which was installed on the systems of anyone doing project management. This pattern was repeated for other software. My complaints were ignored and I was told to stay out of it. The data center manager was finally canned after telling someone in senior management that it would take three or four days to buy a modem cable through the vendor he was using. High stress thankless job working for cheapskate hypocrites.

  94. Quit by endianx · · Score: 1, Informative

    Your employer is stealing. Quit.

    1. Re:Quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, they are pirating! Arrr!

  95. If they'll steal from them they'll steal from you by aarongadberry · · Score: 1

    Go find an honest employer. And no, government work doesn't count.

  96. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tool with a new Z4

    But you repeat yourself.

    Does anyone other than tools drive those?

  97. It's only piracy when someone else does it! by xmt27 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A trip down memory lane:

    "Selling games is strictly self-serving also. Apparently, you think its fantastic for companies to be driven by greed, but the customers should be selfless? Same old shit as the banks - capitalise the profit, socialise the loss."
    (damburger 24 Oct Score: 5)

    "In what you gave as an analogy, the hypothetical person STOLE food from the restaurant- the restaurant is out the food and drink the person took by not paying. In the case of infringement, someone merely takes a copy thereof- and nobody's out anything save maybe a cash transaction that might or might not have happened. They're not out their original copy, so it's not theft."
    (Svartalk 24 Oct Score: 5)

    "If I copy something that an artist produced, it doesn't cost that artist either time or effort. The time and effort has already been spent, they have no way of getting it back.
    The only possibility is that they might get payment in compensation for it. As long as anything I do does not affect their chance of getting this compensation, I see no possible way in which it can be immoral. Therefore, as long as I can be sure that I am not going to pay for a copy, I see no way that making my own copy is immoral."
    (julesh 24 Oct Score: 4)

    "Yeah just like getting bit by an ant 'hurts' me, but not really. It's just an ant. Nothing to have a hissy-fit over like IRAA and the BSA seem to be having.
    BSA: 'Oh noes! We've been bit an ant. The end is nigh'
    US: 'Stop being a wuss.'"
    (commodore64_love 12 Oct Score: 4)

    I think what's going on here is most people see business purchases of commercial software as a way to justify their own piracy, like this person:

    "Through college I had the full version of Matlab/Simulink. I used toolboxes that the school didn't have when doing class projects. I learned everything I could about it and the toolboxes available.
    Now, 6 years later, I was able to talk my boss into buying a few extra special toolboxes for the work we do. Something close to $30k a seat a year. Had I never 'pirated' all that software I would have never been able to sell my self to my company, nor sell my company on Matlab toolboxes."
    (0100010001010011 12 Oct Score: 4)

    1. Re:It's only piracy when someone else does it! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      About that last point:

      MATLAB has a student licence for $300 that includes every. single. package. They provide it just for the cases like the last guy.

      On the other hand, one of my professors bought MATLAB and then used a cracked version because it ran faster without the licencing software.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:It's only piracy when someone else does it! by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to call BS on your last point. I believe you (that you were told this information), just that your professor is either an idiot or a liar. The licensing is done once at start up and then like every hour. That is not enough to "slow down" matlab. I've even run matlab locally while the license server is remote ( 3 down/1 up Mb) internet connection and not noticed a difference.

    3. Re:It's only piracy when someone else does it! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Meh, if I had a dollar for every wrong or misinformed thing my profs taught me, it would have paid my tuition in full.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    4. Re:It's only piracy when someone else does it! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I believe you (that you were told this information), just that your professor is either an idiot or a liar. The licensing is done once at start up and then like every hour.

      It's also possible that messing with license servers can cause instability and require a restart of some long-running calculation.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    5. Re:It's only piracy when someone else does it! by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      ? I've left programs running for hours. I guess I've never tried pulling my internet connection during that time. Based on experience, it appears to only check for the license after a certain time has elapsed AND there has been user input. But I havn't been that rigorous about proving it as it has never caused a problem.

    6. Re:It's only piracy when someone else does it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious troll is obvious.

      You can quote a bunch of users, I can bunch of uses saying the contrary, it does not make a gross generalization against an entire website, or group of users any more logical or true.

  98. Make an attempt by m509272 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Make an attempt to switch them over to free for commercial use products as mentioned (e.g. 7-Zip, whatever free PDF software). That might get them into the mood to switch over to more FOSS or pay for licenses once it's shown to be a success. Then ask "what should we do with the remainder of the license issues" that they are more hesitant to switch from (e.g. Office) pointing out that a disgruntled employee or ex-employee could turn them in for a bounty. You want to appear that you are helping them to avoid a potentially huge fine. They will either go along with it or possibly fire you. If they fire you drop a dime and collect additional unemployment benefits.

  99. Blackmail by Inda · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ask for a brown paper bag full of cash in exchange for your silence.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  100. Play it straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Do your own audit on the pretense that you've been reading on the web that the BSA is stepping up enforcement, and you want to be ready with documentation in case you're audited.

    2. Submit your calm, rational, objective report to your boss (not the CEO unless that's your boss) and ask for assistance tracking down the "missing licenses."

    3. Act as though you're REALLY WORRIED that your WONDERFUL COMPANY might get in trouble, but be subtle about it. Don't make the Queen of Denmark mistake (the lady doth protest too much, methinks)

    4. Keep a copy of your audit data and report. Keep a journal of every interaction with your boss or the company brass.

    5. If you're disciplined or threatened, maintain the posture that it's all about the company, not about obligation, law, ethics, etc. It's *all about the company's ongoing success*

    6. If you're shown the door, you've already got the documentation at home: turn the bastards in to the BSA.

     

  101. Pretty obvious, when you think about it by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 0

    As an I.T. worker and as an employee, you have a moral duty (if not a fiduciary one) to your employer and to your fellow employees to protect them from legal or other threats to the organization. Part of that duty entails things like doing your job competently, avoiding security risks (like propping doors open or not locking your workstation), and so forth. Regardless of the direction from your management, you would be acting negligently if you did not confirm software licensing status to your satisfaction before deploying said software. You can and should say something like, "I can't install this version of Office because it is clearly unlicensed - you can find the CD key on Google." Or: "I need the original media to install this program."

    It gets more complicated when your employer uses software subscriptions or some internal software deployment mechanism instead of retail purchases installed by hand. You should still verify compliance as best you can, given that you may not have access to the official digital distribution site, license key list, or subscription terms.

    Business people think in terms of risk, so if they require you to justify your actions (because they see you as being obstructionist instead of dutiful), you need to be ready with compliance costs versus potential infringement judgment/settlement costs along. I'm sure BSA has suitably terrifying numbers on their web site. Some managers refuse to see reason because they are incompetent (they don't understand the software license terms) or unethical (they are willfully violating the licenses), which should indicate to you that you need to find new employment. Companies with bad management aren't a good place to work and may not last very long, and in today's economy, you need a lot of time to look for a new job. I think that it's better to start your search while you still have a paycheck and medical insurance.

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
  102. the 2 suggestions combination by jjoelc · · Score: 1

    First, document everything, and be honestly prepared to walk away from the company and report them to the BSA if needed.

    Then, show them the possibilities. Whether that is through FOSS, or buying legitimate licenses... Whatever route you think you may actually have a chance of convincing them to follow

    If they take the opportunity you present them to become legit, all is well. If they balk, you walk... and report tham.

  103. Re:WinZip? Really??? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    because he'll have people asking "where's my winzip" and then "install winzip please". non-techies are pretty upset when you force them to take time out of their already busy day to learn some new technology. zip is probably a bad example, but going from MS office to openoffice is incomprehensible for the average office worker.

  104. Too Late by DeanFox · · Score: 3, Informative


    It sounds clear they're not going to change business practices. There's always reporting them to the BSE or some other software piracy watchdog then going through a very painful (from what I hear) audit. You've already made known pirated software bothers you and if all of a sudden a watchdog group shows at your door with a warrant or whatever they use... You're screwed as far as continuing with this company. Likely you'll be fired for some unrelated subjective cause.

    You can shut-up and look the other way or you can leave and report them. You cannot force them to change, you cannot report them and stay. Do your own math...

    -[d]-

    1. Re:Too Late by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Giving them mad cow disease sounds a bit harsh

  105. Protect Yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to figure out your own liability in this matter and take steps to protect yourself. If the BSA audits, can your company use you as a scapegoat? Even if your company doesn't use you, are you liable to BSA fines anyway?

    Clearly distinguish 'legal' from 'moral' in your head. 'Moral' advice here will range from 'keep your head down' to 'quit and call the BSA'. That's up to you, but make sure you're 'legally' protected.

  106. From someone in the trenches. by dthanna · · Score: 2, Informative

    Either get licensed or get a new job - seems to be the running theme here. I agree. As the license manager (and product expert) for Adobe Acrobat at my company I can honestly say that if you don't have the support of leadership to get and stay licensed you really need to get a new job. Software worth using is software worth paying for. Many software companies really would rather you became compliant rather than have to deal with litigation - no one wins. And in these economic times your negotiation power is that much greater. You can always threaten with the 'I really like your xyz product, but if terms aren't favorable I guess we will just have to go with the FOSS abc tool. Yea, we are willing to take the functional hit.' Two things - be willing to back it up. Be reasonable in your requests. Sorry - you will never get Acrobat Pro for less that $250/seat unless you are handing over at least seven figures. But by then, you are already at CLP Level 4 pricing - which is a significant discount against list - that you can leverage across ALL your Adobe products (CS, Flex, etc.) For Acrobat - Yea, it's expensive but it does a lot of things that are hard to do with FOSS* tools. You may also want to investigate just 'lower cost' alternatives - Nuance's is pretty good along the solution from ArtsPDF. With some negotiation you may be able to get Nuance's sub $10US/seat. Stay away from PDF995 and other such really low-cost tools - they aren't worth the hassle. The primary problem with them is the way they handle the conversion. Most are implemented as a GDI printer which tends to have problems with some graphics and layout accuracy. Direct to PDF is the best (e.g. Adobe CS tools), but if the underlying library is bunk that makes the PDF bunk. Second best is through PostScript, but it has it's limitations. PDF, as a filetype, is much, much more complicated than many folks realize. A lots of ways to screw it up - not so many to do it right. * Sorry if I rub some folks wrong here - but I have yet to find a FOSS implemented PDF library that is any good. The GNU library, and products based on it (OpenOffice, GhostScript, FOP, etc.) really produce poor quality PDFs in the production world. For quick, one-off work it works just fine. But when you have to take their PDF output and use it as input into another system (or even just to combine them) they tend to breakdown. Or the PDF becomes overly bloated. Yes, the Adobe library is expensive, but I know what I am getting and don't have problems with them. PDFlib is also a really good production-grade library and isn't all that expensive. Licensing terms are more than generous. More language bindings and platforms than you can shake a stick at (even native z/OS - not just USFHFS). We had some reasonable success with iText for on-the-fly generation but in a production print workflow, not all that good.

  107. Re:I don't think that means what you think it mean by cromar · · Score: 1

    Endangering one's job, no, since you are only an anonymous snitch. And doing so to avoid unethical behavior? Please. You can get a different job to avoid that. It's obvious that those that snitch to the BSA are just interested in the "rewards of up to $1,000,000 for qualifying reports." Cowardly, indeed.

  108. "Get another job"? by DJ+Particle · · Score: 1

    Where?

    The cold hard fact is that right now in most first-world countries, companies are getting rid of IT staff and farming them out to SE Asia.

    The few IT professionals left in FWCs really can't leave, because they are considered expendable. Companies know that because of this, they have the IT pros right where they want them. "Do as we say or you will never work again!" And it's more real than most people think. Former IT pros can't get service jobs unless they lie on their apps (to say they have less education than they actually have). Take it from one who's tried. The service jobs don't want educated people because (a) they are more likely to question their work when things get unethical and (b) the company feels they can't count on a long-term commitment from an employee who would at a moment's notice bolt for a better job if anything comes down the pike. A manager from Speedway SuperAmerica actually told me this back in 2005.

    It used to mean a college education meant a better chance at a real job. Now, unless your education is in one of the few remaining non-farmable jobs (like health care), it means a one-way ticket to the unemployment line for the rest of your life.

    The person stuck in this situation is quite literally in a 'damned either way' situation. He will lose his job, either by whistleblowing as revenge, or by being thrown under the bus when the company gets found out.

  109. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a tough ethical quandary and certainly I think the OP should be looking for a new job.

    But the reality is that if you "drop a dime on'em" you must realize that most small and medium sized companies will not survive after a software audit followed by fines, penalties and paying to bring all their software into compliance.

    So yeah, the dirty boss will get his, but all the good people you work with will find themselves unemployed at a time of record unemployment.

  110. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not necessarily.

    If it's within your purview, you can always try ordering licenses for the software in question, or submitting the purchase request through proper channels. When asked why, explain that you cannot find any licensing information, and you're looking to protect the company's interests.

    That said, it's not your job to make policy, nor is it your responsibility to protect the financial interests of the publishers of the software in question.

    So, keep a record of all of your meetings and document all conversations you had with any superiors regarding the situation. Obviously you don't want to include any especially damning details one way or the other -- your goal here is not retribution, it's job and career security. If you said nothing to management about a problem you knew about, then you're at fault. At the same time, you don't want to take the fall if/when someone reports your company. Keeping records will help to defend against either scenario, and improve your job prospects should you be "let go." It's evidence that you were trying to be a team player. CYA -- Cover Your Ass -- but don't rock the boat unless you're prepared for the consequences when everyone ends up in the water (including yourself).

  111. Write a fake virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Write a fake virus, and install it on all PC's in the company. At a determined time, have it generate a popup that says:

    "This machine has been infected with the spdpv.exe virus. That is, the Sotware Piracy Detection and Punishment Virus". This virus has detected multiple unlicensed software installations on this PC. Approximately XX GB of YOUR potentlially important data has been identified on this PC. Any attempt to remove this virus will result in the immediate deletion of all this data. The only safe way to remove this virus, is unstall all improperly licensed software, THEN INSTALL PROPERLY LICENSED software. Once you remove the stolen software, you must replace it with properly purchased software, within 24 hours. Not doing so, will result in deletion of your data within 48 hours.

    All purchased software you install must be individually licensed for this machine. Buying a copy, then installing it on mutliple machines on your network will be detected, and you won't have 48 hours to fix that one :)

    You have 4 days to comply"

    For the amount of data identified, use a random # generator. Set the trigger time for your next (LONG) vacation.

  112. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: has anyone here reaped the reward of that sweet, sweet cash?

    Nothing bettar than getting PAID to PUNISH your PHB for not using FOSS!

  113. Why are you using Winzip? by Celt · · Score: 1

    Seriously...winzip sucks use 7zip instead, its free, opensource and provides alot more options and imho better compression then winzip

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    1. Re:Why are you using Winzip? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Seriously...winzip sucks use 7zip instead, its free, opensource and provides alot more options and imho better compression then winzip

      This reminds me of reviews I used to read on download.com, they would be everything from "brilliant" to "DON'T USE THIS PROGRAM, I INSTALLED IT AND NOW MY COMPUTER DOESN'T WORK ANYMORE!!!!!!!!"

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Why are you using Winzip? by gregthebunny · · Score: 1

      Regarding 7zip...

      • The interface sucks. Looks like my five-year-old cousin designed with his crayons. In fact, I'm pretty sure he would have done a better job.
      • 99% of the world uses WinZip-compatible "standard" .zip formats, not .7z. 7zip is its own format that WinZip does not support (neither any other "zip" program, for that matter).
      • Claiming FOSS doesn't immediately make something a better product. A lot of FOSS products are immature and/or underdeveloped.
  114. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it worked in the Bible. :)

  115. Pretty Crappy by fwarren · · Score: 1

    Your president is being pretty crappy putting you in this situation. This is much like how accountants have ethical guidelines they are to follow. Management often "leans" on them tell "little white lies". In the case of accountants they are held legally liable for the documents they sign, no matter WHY they actually did it.

    In your case the only group you are likely to run afoul of is the BSA. When it comes to making an example of someone, fining them and then getting them to license the software they are after your president, not you.

    It's your call on how you handle it. Call the BSA and report them. Do a memo to the president and keep a copy. Explain to him that he will be held liable for fines and jail time if any disgruntled employee or competitor called the BSA. That the BSA is the FINAL arbitrator of what is legit and what is not. That your current setup will net you a perp walk on TV, the company shut down and millions in fines. (Yes, I know they will settle but that it how it starts).

    You can try offering alternatives such as freeware. Moving to hosted things like google docs (look a built in backup plan). Ultimately I would look for another job. You WILL not be happy there in the long run. If the president won't pay for software, I promise you that they will fire you when they can find someone who will do your job for less. You have just been hit with a cluestick. You are going to have to find a new job. Your president lied to you when YOU told them that the software was not legit and they said they were sure it was. They have NO ethics and no problem doing something illegal to save a buck. Firing you to replace you with someone cheaper is not nice but is is leagal, why wont they do that? The only questions is do you get to do it while you are still working and can ask for MORE money from a new employer or after you are fired and can only ask for less money.

    P.S. The memo that you sent to the president. Is a get out of jail free card when you refuse to install pirate software. Because if you are let go, all you have to do is claim you were terminated in retaliation for NOT committing an illegal act. And yes, the BSA is actually right on this point. It is illegal to pirate software.

    Also it bothers me when someone wearing a $500 suit and lives in a mansion want ME to pirate a copy of a $500 program when they spend more than that each month on their favorite hobby.

    --
    vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  116. The Man can't buy your ethos. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plain and simple; you know they're breaking the law, you told them you know they're breaking the law, their response was to claim ignorance.

    We'll get back to claimed ignorance in a second...

    When you know someone is breaking the law, you have an ethical and legal responsibility to report them. The moral thing to do is try to resolve it quietly (which you've tried)

    I can hear the argument now "but its his employer!!!!" Yeah, and when someone PAYS you to be quiet about them BREAKING THE LAW, that's called bribery, and it's far less ethical than, if say this man just happened to overhear about some random company doing the same thing.

    Bottom line: you know about someone breaking the law. He doesn't seem to be aware of it (which is no excuse - it is the ethical responsiblity of a citizen to make himself aware and knowledgeable of all societal standards s/he's expected to comply with). If you don't now report it, you are not only implicitly involved in the original crime (especially as you seem to be the one routinely asked to implement these illegal orders), you're potentially breaking DIFFERENT laws as well

    Back to the claimed ignorance. There are two distinct possibilities:

    He's lying - in which case, he's complicit in soliciting your participation in a crime
    He's telling the truth - in which case, he needs to learn that this is a matter worth his personal attention in the future, before the problem becomes even more of a financial quagmire (as it is, it's sounding like it'll take 10's or 100's of thousands of dollars to get into compliance...)

    so, either he's lying to try to trick you into breaking the law for him, or he's telling the truth and a total idiot...

    In either case, reporting him becomes a moral issue, as your current and future employability, and therefore livelihood, is being endangered by his action (or lack thereof)

    I don't know how anonymous you can make it, but the BSA (http://www.bsa.org/country/Report%20Piracy.aspx) seems like a good choice for this...

  117. A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you install something that you know for sure does not have a legit license:
    1. Are you committing a crime? ( as in fines and jail time )
    2. When you have discussed it with management and then do it, are you committing the crime of conspiracy?
    3. Will management (or others in the know) attempt to blackmail you with this information?
    4. If you stay there a while, and leave, and a few years later the company gets nailed for this, do you remove them from your resume? If you do, what do you put there instead?

    Of course, these all depend on where you are and other factors...

  118. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by oldspewey · · Score: 1

    Just be sure that when you call a Z4 driver a tool, you're ready to back it up.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  119. Arrrr! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This 'ere scurrvy scallywag be tauntin ourr profession? Me thinks this landlubber's in fer some keelhaulin, strring 'em up!

  120. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by The+Moof · · Score: 1

    won't serve you up as the sacrificial lamb to the Powers That Be in a heartbeat when some disgruntled ex-employee rats to the BSA

    Documentation is key. When you bring up formal complaints with management, document them. It's quite hard for them to paint you as a sacrificial lamb when you have a paper trail stating the opposite of their claims.

    Also, as other have said, if the complaints fall on deaf ears, it might be a good idea to jump ship for a more reputable company.

  121. 1-888-NOPIRACY by Animats · · Score: 1
  122. Add education by aaandre · · Score: 1

    There is also the possibility to educate your manager/boss about the serious risk of using unlicensed software and the potential financial consequences. This would require you to risk getting really honest with him.

    As you educate, you may offer FOSS alternatives and have him make the choice. You can also educate him on how difficult it is for you to partake in an ambiguously legal activity by fulfilling his requests.

    This has the potential to create a more honest environment, more connected relationship with the person you work for, and more integrity for the company.

    No need to be a hardball and issue ultimatums. Rather, offer solutions and convey where you're at while retaining clear boundaries. And, next time you install something, you may ask for a legally obtained serial, and possibly educate him about the one-license per employee concept.

    Good luck.

    1. Re:Add education by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      There is also the possibility to educate your manager/boss about the serious risk of using unlicensed software and the potential financial consequences. This would require you to risk getting really honest with him.

      As someone said above, the BSA is sociopathic.

      This is a very good reason to stay as far away from them as possible, and make sure all your licenses are good.

      Which, incidentally, means using commercial software as little as possible, at least in my book. My company uses Windows (legal), Office (legal) and Adobe CS4 (legal), Nortons (legal).

      And we use some 'free for any use' commercial software, like Skype. We don't use shareware unless we've already paid the license. I don't think we have any out there currently, but we've bought some in the past.

      And that's about it for the commercial software, or in fact non-OSS software.

      Seriously people, there are probably some good reasons for not going entirely OSS. Go ahead, get Windows, get Office, get AutoCAD or whatever, and make sure it's all legal.

      But there aren't good reasons for not going mostly OSS. There's no good reason to use unregistered WinZip instead of 7-zip, or pirate Nero instead of InfraRecorder.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  123. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

    I'd prefer this Z4 over the car.

  124. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not like this has ever been tried before -- hell, you might even think of making an entire religion out of your immaculate conception.

  125. Stand up for what's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One poster said "your goal here is not retribution, it's job and career security."

    I understand people have families and have big fears of losing their jobs, but I say well done to you for wanting to do the right thing and not just thinking of yourself.

    The same people who would stand by corporate theft of software are the same people who would work for a company who manufactures their stuff in sweat shops. Extreme example? Maybe. True? Most definitely. They don't have the balls to stand up for what they believe and instead reinforce the attitude with each other that it's ok to think only of yourself. Cowards. Screw them.

  126. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call the BSA and collect the reward "Bounty" they offer.

    Live off it till you find a new job, leave this part (reporting your employer to the BSA) off your resume.

    Lather rinse repeat till enough BSA Blood Money has accumulated so you can retire.

  127. Document, Educate, Report as a last resort by natehoy · · Score: 1

    Give the company a solid chance to come clean and fix up their licensing issues, with enough information to decide whether they want to. A lot of these issues can be cleared up with truly free software. Some things, like the WinZip delay thing, are technically not illegal but sure can't be helping internal feelings about the company's compliance (in other words, they are obvious signs that the company has licensing issues, and therefore might make a disgruntled employee a nice severance package courtesy of the BSA).

    Make sure you have CLEAR documentation that you are undergoing that effort and are actively communicating your findings to management. Make sure that said documentation points out the cost and risk of not complying, and make it clear that while you have no interest in profiting by reporting it, others easily might. That may include citations of the BSA's cut and how much a disgruntled employee could potentially make if they decided to.

    Don't threaten to blow the whistle yourself, but make it clear that someone easily could, and try to work with them to get things cleared up. At the same time, be sure it is well documented that you are a driving force for compliance. That way, if the company decides to screw you over and make you the scapegoat, you have plenty of evidence to demonstrate that the problem was there long before you were, and that you were trying to get them in compliance.

    If, after all of your effort, the company decides that they would rather continue operations as-is, you have to let your conscience and circumstances be your guide on that one. Generally the proper thing to do is leave the company and contact the BSA. But you have to call the shots as you see them - if your employer is your father-in-law or has a title of of "Don", or both, you might want to simply become a very respectful advocate for truly free software and hope you can cop a plea if the company ever gets caught. And do what you're told because Guido can make the BSA boys look like rank amateurs, and a few years in prison with intact kneecaps is better than doing a personal verification to see if cement footwear is waterproof. I mean, I like the water and all, but...

    As far as your immediate "what do I do about the computer in front of me" issue... Personally, I have refused and will continue to refuse to install software on company hardware unless it's clearly legal to do so.

    I can also say that really easily - I've only had one company ever ask it of me, and they had some serious compliance issues, but the decision was easy. After a long meeting with a few executives about the risks to the company and an honest assessment how much money the company was really "saving", they decided it was best to spend the money on valid licenses and have me remove anything that was not in compliance until we could clear things up.

    This was also a financial management company that had a lot of customer data in their possession and processed checks and other monetary instruments by the thousands every day - having the word hit the street that they couldn't count licenses or were knowingly engaging in piracy could lead to an exceptionally unpleasant visit from people far less forgiving than the BSA. They had also never had an IT resource before - each department bought their own software and I was their first foray into a centralized IT "organization", if you want to call a young snot-nosed kid happy to have a folding table in the server room as his desk on his first IT job an "organization".

    The uninstall/buy/reinstall process was VERY ugly, but at the end we had a fully compliant company with a clear sheet of purchased licenses and a clean process for transferring licenses from computer to computer, and all the install media was locked away. I won't say we hit 100%, people still brought in pirated software (this was in the Windows 3.11 days, much harder to prevent it back then). But we had pretty clear documentation that we were doing our best to keep things clean.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  128. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by cyphercell · · Score: 1

    agreed, anyways if someone else rats them out and he has left there isn't any guarantee someone else won't try to hang him out to dry - even after he's left. Get another job, rat them out, go to a competing business, rat them out, get out asap and call on your first day off of payroll.

    --
    Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  129. Get the CEO's response in hard copy! by The_Deacon · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a dangerous position to be in, since **** rolls downhill when someone calls the BSA. First thing to do at this point is get some documentation. Email the CEO with your same concerns, maybe add in some of your research, and get his response via email, then print it out & save it! Then, when the audit happens and he points the finger at you, you can defend yourself. Otherwise, your conversation with the CEO (and his response) is irrelevant. Remember: if it isn't written down, it never happened -- the CEO could say you were installing unlicensed software without his knowledge, and then its your neck on the line.

    And as far as calling an audit goes, think VERY carefully before calling the BSA in. It's going to be pretty obvious to the CEO who called the BSA, especially after you've been coming to him with these concerns. They may not know 100% for sure, but that's not going to stop them from finding some way to get rid of you. More importantly, if your CEO is networked well within your local business community, he may be able to blackball you from getting another job. Based on the information you've given, I would personally go for a paper trail where the CEO tells you NOT to fix the licensing issues, save that, and look for employment elsewhere. If you're going to call the BSA, wait until ~6 months after you're happily employed elsewhere before burning those bridges by calling an audit.

  130. Then THEY should get another job by Snaller · · Score: 0, Troll

    Copyright is theft.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Then THEY should get another job by sbeckstead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ok this is a blatant troll but I'll bite anyway. Copyright is not theft. Endless copyright may be wrong but that will change eventually. In the mean time we have laws and I still want to get paid. So whether you think so or not, copyrights and patents are there for a reason most of which involve me being able to eat and make the rent in order to continue to produce more software for you (collective not getting personal) to pirate.

    2. Re:Then THEY should get another job by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Oh and Kudos for actually having a name!

    3. Re:Then THEY should get another job by racermd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The better (business) solution is to speak to management in terms they can understand - money.

      I'm not saying that they need to feel threatened. Instead, point out that you are looking out for the interests of the company and want to ensure all bases are covered in the event of a short-notice software audit.

      Then you outline a plan to audit the computers on your network and a plan for remediation (buying licenses, uninstalling software, and/or using some sort of network-wide metering package). Again, this should be done with the focus on how much this will cost the company versus not complying and getting caught with unlicensed software. Remember, management really only cares about budgets and how much of it needs to be expended. It might also help to explain that your own ass is on the line as the IT admin and that, by formally notifying management (you *are* documenting this formally, right?), they are just as culpable if/when a BSA audit occurs.

      Part of a good admin's job is to audit the environment regularly for such things, anyway. Even if no action is taken on the findings, at least you know where you're starting from when action ultimately does need to be taken - for any sort of project, not just software license management.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    4. Re:Then THEY should get another job by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Endless copyright may be wrong but that will change eventually

      You're not very good at extrapolation, are you? I'll admit I share a very tiny sliver of your hope, but I'm certainly not holding my breath. If any kind of sane copyright laws get enacted during my lifetime, I'll be very surprised.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:Then THEY should get another job by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      sane copyright laws will have a chance to come when people no longer buy kitsch with round black ears (M-i-c k-e-y you get the idea)

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    6. Re:Then THEY should get another job by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Sane copyright laws will come about when we can regain control of our government and elect people without a commercial axe to grind. As long as money makes the rotunda go round we lose!

    7. Re:Then THEY should get another job by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Bull. Turn them into the BSA, and let the fuckers get fined. use the reward money as income until you find your next gig.

    8. Re:Then THEY should get another job by temcat · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't care about Troll moderation, but anyway, if you said "violation of property rights" instead of "theft," the meaning would be basically the same, but it wouldn't provoke knee-jerk reaction as much.

    9. Re:Then THEY should get another job by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Endless copyright may be wrong but that will change eventually."

      I beg to differ. History as well as current trends show that copyright law is getting more and more restrictive, less and less fair, and will continue to do so, UNLESS the people stand up and say, "Enough is ENOUGH!"

      That ACTA treaty that is secretly being worked out scares me. The "IP Holders" seem to have all the say on it. As an international treaty, it will trump national law once a nation signs on to it. It seems that "3 strikes and you're out" will be an integral part of the treaty. But, NO ONE KNOWS anything for sure, because the *IAA's of the world are in, and the public is out of any discussion.

      Copyright law could conceivably be as bad as anything Orwelle envisioned. It could even require police ware on your computer, which will report anything you do. Insane.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:Then THEY should get another job by mpfife · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Agree with the approach, but be VERY mindeful of what your about to do when doing such an audit. Every good geek in us says yes, it SHOULD be done and problem fixed. But the second you put pen to paper, or if there was word you did such an audit, you best be prepared to testify in court against your employer - even if the DO come into compliance later. You're basically leaving/creating THE paper trail on the wrongdoing, and you better believe if it at some future point gets caught - and the lawyers might look for a 'history of abuse' at the company - they'll find that you were the guy that carefully documented it for them. How nice. Subpeona and summons for you. You might even get served for discovery long after you've left the company.

      Just know what you're getting into first and make sure you're ready for that. Getting calls from lawyers from your previous job on your current job usually doesn't earn you cool points with bosses no matter how right you were...

    11. Re:Then THEY should get another job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright is theft. It is theft of permission (that is, permission to copy).

    12. Re:Then THEY should get another job by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Endless copyright may be wrong but that will change eventually.

      Too late. Copyright has already lost the veneer of respectability. There is no social stigma attached to breaking it, nor bangs of conscience, so now the copyright cartels have switched to Three-Strike Law and other draconian measures - which, of course, only serve to further paint pro-copyright people as vile villains and the Pirate Bay guys as heroes a shining armor.

      In the mean time we have laws and I still want to get paid. So whether you think so or not, copyrights and patents are there for a reason most of which involve me being able to eat and make the rent in order to continue to produce more software for you (collective not getting personal) to pirate.

      We do indeed have laws. When those laws are considered a nuisance by the majority, they are impossible to enforce (see Prohibition for an example). Maybe you could sue Disney for damages - their Mickey Mouse Protection Acts are a large reason why copyright is given the same respect that "Don't fuck virgins" -laws that some states still have.

      In other words: you want to be paid for every copy in use and little city girls want ponies. Little girls's wishes are far more realistic.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    13. Re:Then THEY should get another job by PipingSnail · · Score: 1

      Copyright is not theft.

      Then you need to do some serious studying.

      Using copyrighted material without paying for the right to do so (except for fair use situations), IS theft.

      Your comments are not insightful, they are downright ignorant.

    14. Re:Then THEY should get another job by Paradoks · · Score: 1

      I Am Not A Lawyer, but theoretically a lawyer would understand that "copyright infringement" and "theft" are different things. Theft deprives someone of property(Yes, theft can have a broader meaning, but under that broader meaning murder is theft, too). Copyright infringement deprives someone from exercising their limited-term(and limited-scope) monopoly.

      This doesn't mean that copyright infringement is okay; just that it's different in important ways when someone steals a CD rather than pirate the MP3s.

      All that said, I think you missed the original poster's point, which is that "copyright is not theft", not that "copyright infringement is not theft".

    15. Re:Then THEY should get another job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The better (business) solution is to speak to management in terms they can understand - money.

      You know, I used to believe that's all it took, talking to them in their terms, money.
      This has very rarely worked in my own experience.
      I am constantly amazed at the idiocy of some companies who would rather have one or more members of their own staff jumping through ridiculous hoops to use unlicensed software, and costing the business at least $10000 in lost productivity each year, rather than pay $5000 in software license fees for life.
      I think it's down to the short-sightedness of so many businesses these days. Offer them a solution that costs them (say) $5000 now, but no more over the next 5 years versus a solution that costs them $1200 per year for the next 5 years and they'll take the latter option, even assuming both solutions are equally "good".

  131. Write it down... by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

    There's a certain amount of liability in using non-freeware. Even if you purchased a license for the software, without proof you're in for a world of hurt if anyone makes an issue of it (and, Business Software Alliance members like Microsoft do periodically audit licensees and companies they reserve tips about). An audit is a pain in the butt, but the cost in responding if you don't have the information can be pretty rough. And, if it turns out they want to make a case of it, keep in mind there's a $200,000 fine and possible jail time for any willful violation (if it gets as far as court).

    If you want to indemnify yourself, the first order of business is to write an e-mail to the senior management (and legal, if you have a legal department) simply stating that you are reviewing the software license compliance and find that the documentation is lacking. Point out that the licensors due reserve the right to audit the company, and there's ample precedence for them doing so to small and medium-sized businesses. Note that failure to document compliance properly is a potential liability.

    Wait for a response. If they tell you not to worry about it, then you need to decide whether you need to report suspected piracy to the BSA or vendor, or whether you'll sit tight. Chances are pretty good that you won't get audited, but if you do, you're going to probably be partially responsible. If you report to BSA - they won't tell your company why they are knocking at the door, but your boss is likely to have his/her suspicions.

    From the CEO's point of view, there's a cost/benefit to consider. Compliance comes at a cost. Non-compliance has a potential cost which could be much higher, but the probability of that cost occurring is low. If the cost of non-compliance times the probability of getting caught is lower than the cost of compliance, then non-compliance is a lower risk/cost. For a company that has a mandate to be profitable, compliance with laws and regulations only makes sense if the cost of compliance is cheaper than the cost of non-compliance.

    Personally, I'd sell my company up the river if I thought the blood-letting would be reasonably contained to the management responsible. If I felt that it would kill the company and endanger innocent people's jobs, I'd look for a new place to work becuase I'd recognize that my job was only going to last until someone becomes disgruntled and reports the company out of spite (which is how BSA usually gets most small to medium-sized businesses).

  132. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you suggest I do the same thing?

    At my company, we downloaded all of our software for free off of the Internet. The software titles include: OpenBSD, Inkscape, Komodo, and Gimp.

    I'm torn because the owner openly and brazenly brags about this.

  133. What I Would Do by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    Send out an email to the entire company asking for licenses, CDs, and product keys for a license reconciliation.

    Before or during this time, send out resumes. Do not proceed until you have another job lined up.

    Send another email enumerating all of the unlicensed software. This can be sent to management only if you prefer (but be sure to include everyone in the chain of command above you up to the president/officer level). Retain hard copies of any messages and responses---you won't want to advertise that you're retaining copies though.

    Your email should include numbers---e.g., we have XXX copies of Microsoft Office XP installed and only YY valid licenses/keys. Conclude with a list of products and the number of licenses of each that must be purchased in order to be legal.

    Await shit storm. Remember licenses will always have some hardcopy either in the form of a key code, certificate of authenticity, or printout from the vendor web site. If necessary, send out a followup with amended numbers once they provide documentation of additional licenses.

    Eventually, they will either buy all the necessary licenses or tell you not to worry about it. At this point, you resign and take your new job.

    *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

    If they bought the licenses, your resume can now include "improved license tracking, software license validation, and asset reconciliation". Congratulations on the new skill set and your new job.

    If they did not buy the licenses, you can call the BSA. I believe they have some sort of reward program for whistle blowers. Congratulations on the windfall and your new job.

    Oh yeah... Be sure to retouch upon the licensing issue every week or two until you resign as a demonstration of due diligence. This ensures that management is aware of the issue and it is their negligence rather than your own which lead to any license violations.

    Either way, you win as long as you play your cards right and plan ahead. Good luck.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  134. Don't Copy That Floppy! by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up863eQKGUI

    That is a must-watch video.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  135. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have the conversation again, and get an audio recording. Then if you ever get your ass on the line, you can bring up the recording again, and just say BAM! it was him.

  136. Buy new copies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most people have already stated the obvious, that you're aware (thus ignorance isn't an option), the company is aware of your knowledge (so you'll be suspected).

    Your other option is to FIX the problem one fix at a time.

    When a new computer is requested, include the cost of software with the purchase (or say "we'll need to purchase a copy").

    This is by far the slowest response, and I'd combine the solution with FOSS options (AVG, etc), but it'll eventually get them up to date.

  137. Don't Copy That 2 (Official Sequel to Don't Copy.. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  138. Run, for more than the obvious reasons. by Talonius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Begin looking for another job as soon as possible. Document your communications with your manager and attempts to get them to go legit. But leave as soon as possible.

    The reason is simple: a company who believes it is okay to do what they're doing is not going to appreciate what YOU do. Your raises will never be good, the respect you garner from upper level management will be negligible, and you will always be treated as a second class citizen that is there only because the world requires it. The companies that do what you're describing are those who view technology as a "necessary evil" and "money sink" rather than the enabler it should be.

    --
    My reality check bounced.
  139. Document! If no change, you must leave. by darth_borehd · · Score: 1

    Send emails with read receipts and save offline copies of all replies. Make it clear that the business in jeopardy because of pirated software. Explain how one employee can call in a claim and the business could be raided by the BSA backed up by police. Express genuine concern about the importance of this. Explain there are open source alternative that cost nothing. If the owner actually says *in writing* that he still doesn't care about purchasing licenses or switching to FOSS, then tell him you cannot continue working under these conditions. You have to do it. If not, as the IT person, you may become liable. Stress the fact that you are being asked to do something ILLEGAL and cannot continue. If he doesn't connect the dots and lets you leave, immediately go to the BSA with your documentation and do exactly what you said "one employee can do." I'm no friend to software companies, EULA, or the BSA--but its the way it is with our current laws and you have protect yourself. Remember, the whistleblower law will protect you as you long as you go the proper authorities first.

  140. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by smartr · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but do you know who's good at documenting things as they pertain to the law? In fact, I bet if you went to management with a recommendation from an attorney, they might be more inclined to listen... Likely no need for the BSA at all.

  141. My own advice, own experience.... by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

    I have worked in a software company for 17 of the last 22 years.

    My company, in particular the CEO and senior management, know copyright law pretty well and have our CIO take steps to ensure we only install and use software that A) we have a valid license for (paid for if closed source, proper license if free, etc.) and B) that we only run the allowed numbers of copies based on the license and C) that we always abide by our licenses.

    Now, me being the V.P. in charge of our Quality Assurance Division, I found a piece of software "Beyond Compare", and bought a copy. I found that it was extremely useful for a good portion of the work I have to do, namely, review code changes from version to version to ensure all of our coding standards are fully applied, including commenting, format, naming conventions, etc. It was so useful, that I did a short study of how often I used it, how long it took me with other tools I had used for the same thing, figured out time savings, compared costs, etc. and put up a request for purchase for a five copy license for use by our Product Managers (with their input as well). Company bought the five copies.

    Now, in your shoes, I can only offer this: You must, to protect your own butt, in writing, inform the company what the license terms for the software are and that there are possible legal issues if they continue to utilize the software in violation of the license, then propose the solution (having done your home work on cost, etc.) of getting the software properly licensed. If management comes back and tells you to mind your own business, or anything of the sort, if it was me, I would find a new job. Because, if the crap hits the fan over the practices of violating license agreements, eventually, the BSA (yes, I hate them too), will come knocking at the door and then management will get a very very rude awakening. It is in the company's best interest to either abide by the licenses for software they are using or to not use such software at all.

    Personally, as much as I hate Microsoft (due to their anti-competitive practices and some other key things), I still abide by their licenses, just like I do for any other software I have or use. I have an aversion to jack-booted-thugs coming in and raiding places. :)

  142. Beyond absurd by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow. What a great justification of illegal activity. Sorry, but djheru is right. Threatening to report illegal activity unless it is stopped is not blackmail. Threatening to report it unless I get some money is, but blackmail involves the blackmailer benefiting.

    You've basically made the argument that no one ever has the right to threaten to go to the police if the criminal activity doesn't stop. That's beyond absurd.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Beyond absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, what you're referring to is called extortion, not blackmail... But thanks for playing.

    2. Re:Beyond absurd by GasparGMSwordsman · · Score: 1

      I believe this would be extortion not blackmail. Although, really, both are bad. You REALLY don't want to put your self in a position to be accused of either.

      From a professional standpoint I would recommend staying away from any situation where you are making demands or threats to your boss. Such a situation will very rarely help you achieve your goals. More often it WILL damage your reputation, instead of being known as XYZ-good-thing, you will be remembered as the guy who threatened the company. Such extreme incidents have a habit of following you for years. It would be better to just leave than risk long-term damage to your reputation.

      If you do want to change the situation, perhaps a less aggressive approach. Next time you are asked to install software product X, have the requester sign a statement that says they have acquired the proper license for this product (or product such a license). This removes the burden from yourself, it is reasonable. Lastly it has a subtle and non-hostile aspect of teaching others about licensing.

      I would also recommend starting a license tracking system.

      The basic idea here is that you don't want to assign blame. You DO want to move forward in a constructive and positive way, while still meeting your legal/moral standards. If your boss says that everything in use is ok, then don't press the point, but instead ensure that everything going forward can be documented as such.

      As for the definition of blackmail, here are a couple of dictionary references (sorry no legal citations, but I am confidante that this would get you in trouble within the US Federal system.):

      From dictionary.com

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/blackmail?jss=0

      blackmail /blækmel/

      -noun

      1. any payment extorted by intimidation, as by threats of injurious revelations or accusations.

      2. the extortion of such payment: He confessed rather than suffer the dishonor of blackmail.

      3. a tribute formerly exacted in the north of England and in Scotland by freebooting chiefs for protection from pillage.

      -verb (used with object)

      4. to extort money from (a person) by the use of threats.

      5. to force or coerce into a particular action, statement, etc.: The strikers claimed they were blackmailed into signing the new contract.

      Notice item number 5. To force or coerce into a particular action.

      Another dictionary reference:

      The crime involving a threat for purposes of compelling a person to do an act against his or her will, or for purposes of taking the person's money or property.

      The term blackmail originally denoted a payment made by English persons residing along the border of Scotland to influential Scottish chieftains in exchange for protection from thieves and marauders.

      In blackmail the threat might consist of physical injury to the threatened person or to someone loved by that person, or injury to a person's reputation. In some cases the victim is told that an illegal act he or she had previously committed will be exposed if the victim fails to comply with the demand.

      Although blackmail is generally synonymous with extortion, some states distinguish the offenses by requiring that the former be in writing.

      Blackmail is punishable by a fine, imprisonment, or both.

      Notice paragraph 3. "In some cases the victim is told that an illegal act he or she had previously committed will be exposed if the victim fails to comply with the demand."

    3. Re:Beyond absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be that as it may, he's very likely right that the sysadmin will end up being the scapegoat...

    4. Re:Beyond absurd by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      It's not blackmail, it's extortion and is still illegal. Either go to the authorities or don't, but you can't threaten to "unless" the other party complies with your wishes. You can say "If it's not fixed by Friday I'm going to the police" but not "do this or I'll make things bad for you". The former gives them a real choice the latter is an order with menaces.

    5. Re:Beyond absurd by spun · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you are wrong. Blackmail and extortion both entail profit of some sort on the part of the blackmailer. Threatening to go to the police unless you get paid is blackmail. Giving a criminal a chance to stop their criminal activity before you go to the police is not blackmail.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    6. Re:Beyond absurd by spun · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Extortion and blackmail are both defined by profit or benefit on the part of the perpetrator. Forcing someone to obey the law is not personal profit, and threatening to turn someone in unless they stop is neither blackmail or extortion.

      But thanks for playing.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    7. Re:Beyond absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackmail or not the threat is still a one-way ticket to unemployment without the option of a good reference. Ask yourself two things before listening this this load:

      1. Is the reward for being a snitch enough to get you through unemployment?
      2. Will burning this bridge hurt you in the job market (loss of recommendation, etc)?

      Generally, awful advice. If it bothers you, the smart move is to document your attempt to fill the legal hole and then look for another job while maintaining killer relations with all your superiors. It's all political — either suck it up or put on a smile until you can move on or risk your prospects. Its pretty simple.

    8. Re:Beyond absurd by GasparGMSwordsman · · Score: 1

      Neither crime requires "profit". The crimes entail forcing an outside party to take an action. There is no requirements on what those actions are in most Common Law jurisdictions other than that the victim has been coerced into them.

      Here is an example of such a case within the US armed forces:

      http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/digest/IIIA55.htm

      A English example would be Jean Violette's extortion conviction. In this case the victim was using the Hell's Angles name. Mr. Violette wanted him to stop using the name. You can read a bit more about this case below (or do web search):

      http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Crown+seeks+year+prison+sentence+Hells+Angel+convicted+extortion+weapons+offences/2188869/story.html

      For the US Government (Fed.) you can find the actual statue under 18 USC Chapter 41:

      http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/41

      The meat of the issue is in the passage, "...demands or receives any money or other valuable thing..." "Other valuable thing(s)" has been interpreted multiple times to include non-monetary services. For example, a politician can be blackmailed or extorted to vote a certain way. An attorney can be coerced into not prosecuting a case with due diligence (look into the history of the Mob for many such examples).

      Here would be I belive the relevent law in Texas:

      http://law.onecle.com/texas/government/432.162.00.html
       
       

      432.162. EXTORTION. A person subject to this chapter
      who communicates threats to another person with the intent to
      obtain anything of value or any acquittance, advantage, or immunity
      is guilty of extortion and shall be punished as a court-martial
      directs.

      Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 147, 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987.

    9. Re:Beyond absurd by GasparGMSwordsman · · Score: 1
      For those of you who don't want to follow the links: http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/digest/IIIA55.htm

      CORE CRIMINAL LAW SUBJECTS: Crimes: Article 127 - Extortion

      2008 (September Term)

      United States v. Brown, 67 M.J. 147 (Article 127, UCMJ, prohibits the communication of threats to another person with the intention thereby to obtain anything of value or any acquittance, advantage, or immunity; the MCM explains that, unless it is clear from the circumstances, the advantage or immunity sought should be described in the specification; the MCM further explains that an intent to make a person do an act against that person's will is not, by itself, sufficient to constitute extortion).

      (in this case, the specification was sufficient to state an offense of extortion under Article 127, UCMJ, in that it described the advantage that appellant sought to achieve (the participation of the victim in sexual relations) and further described the threat communicated to the victim to obtain that advantage (to expose their past sexual relationship in a manner that would harm her military career); as such, the specification was consistent with part IV, para. 54.c.(4) of the MCM, which expresses a preference for an express description of the advantage; moreover, the specification was consistent with the additional guidance in para. 54.c.(4), which states that an intent to have "a person do an act against that person's will," would not be sufficient "by itself" to constitute extortion; here, in addition to alleging that appellant sought to have the victim engage in an act against her will, the specification further alleged that appellant intended to obtain an advantage through her participation with him in sexual relations; as such, the specification did not rely solely, or "by itself," on an allegation that appellant sought to have her engage in an act against her will).

      18 U.S.C. 873 : US Code - Section 873: Blackmail

      Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

    10. Re:Beyond absurd by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, except that people who report their employers to the BSA get a hefty reward. So in this case, the blackmailer would definitely benefit, making it blackmail. It's still a little vague though, since it is an illegal activity.

      However, threatening to report it is downright stupid IMO, because it'll just get the reporter fired (either immediately, or later at an inopportune time). Either ignore it, or report it (after finding a new job, or determining the reward money is enough to carry you over). Don't threaten. It's not going to produce any positive results, and only negative ones.

  143. Not helpful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a single highly-rated comment I've read so far has brought up any specific legal ramifications that the employee might be able to use to make it clear to management just how dangerous to the company it is to be in this situation. I've had to make some of the same arguments with my own management people. Fortunately it's a new and small company with plenty of cash, and management is fairly reasonable. Nevertheless even after all the examples of expensive audits and fines I could come up with, they didn't really see much point when nobody else in the industry (that they know of) has ever had a fully legal license of things like Office for every single computer. In the end they basically just grumbled and went along because I was absolutely adamant about not wanting to break the law.

    What the original poster needs is links to concrete information specifying just how expensive it will be if anyone ever rats on the company. I myself could only find a few articles about companies that had been audited by the BSA, never anything concrete about how much the fines end up being. One colleague from another company made a vague reference to "$10,000 per infraction" but it was in passing and I have no idea what he meant by that or who would be levying the fine.

    When we're dealing with the idiots in management, we don't need vague hand-waving about how software piracy is illegal. We need specific, well-documented examples showing exactly how much financial danger the company will be in if a single disgruntled employee EVER calls up an agency like the BSA. Anyone who has such examples should be taking the time to comment. Sometimes people don't have the luxury of looking for another job.

  144. You have to approach it differently. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    There are two major components here to consider:

    1. You want to stop the piracy.

    2. You do not want to be blamed for it.

    What you have to do to fix these two problems simultaneously is to present a business case. The BSA will fine your company X dollars when you get found out. Find out what X will be. Remind your boss that whomever reports the business to the BSA will get a percentage of X dollars. "I'm perfectly happy here, but do you have anyone in the entire company that's upset? Has anyone been fired? Does anyone hold a grudge against us? Will anyone ever be upset with us?"

    Present solutions, such as "implementing 7-Zip instead of WinZIP will cost $0 materially and deploy in one week. This will save us $Y in labour per year, creating a ROI of ($Y / time it will take you * hourly wage) in one year.

    You can come up with other solutions for the other products. You might have to licence the software if they will not move on the products. You can usually get site licences for AVG, Office, etc. My company buys the licence by the boatload. (i.e. everything is a site licence)
    This will fix the problems with overlicencing (the most common form of piracy)

    Make graphs. Bosses like graphs that tell them when they start making money off a venture. "Switching to this allows for an increase in productivity, giving us an ROI of Z after 6 months." Use Microsoft's data.

    It is simply unacceptable to continue in this manner. You are breaking laws, and doing so commercially. It is one thing to download a cracked version of PhotoShop to participate on Fark / Photoshop Phriday on your home computer or download mp3s for your own amusement. It is a completely different situation to install unlicenced software on a work computer that is being used to make money. The latter is commercial copyright fraud, and it is a Federal Crime in the US. (As far as I know; I'm Canadian and not a lawyer.)

    You can fix the problem. That's how to do it.

    That's the easy part. The second part is in not getting blamed for the piracy after you leave. If you leave unexpectedly, perhaps 10-15 minutes after presenting your case to the boss, then you will assuredly be pointed at as the cause of the problems. "Oh, I'm not too good with computers. Mr. Smith came in and talked to me about how much we could be saving, something about piracy, and then he was installing this one copy of Office on all the computers."

    Now, let's say you go into your boss and he says, "Get... out... you're fired." Tell him, "I am trying to keep you and this company out of jail and bankruptcy. What we are doing is against the law."

    Resist the temptation to say, "I have copies of all these emails." That's for later.

    So you must: Document, document, document! There's a reason that email programs have BCC on them, and THIS IS THE TIME TO USE IT. BCC your personal email account so you have a record of all these emails. If you get fired, let's say two months later, ostensibly "for no reason, but we're moving in a new direction", you can look at the first severance offer carefully. Then reply, "It looks pretty bad that you are firing me just two months after I told you to stop pirating software. I've got copies of every email I sent you, telling you to stop breaking the law. I've brought this up at company meetings in front of lots of disgruntled former staff that owe you no favours. I would get $X from the BSA if I call them on my cell once I leave the building. What's your _real_ severance package?" (The CEO laughed and said, "fuck, all this time I thought you were just a pushover.")

    And that is basically how I lost my first job out of University. They're bankrupt now, but that was due to an unsustainable business model, not anything I did.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  145. Had the same issue at a very large company. by Archfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sent an email to the person who should have been in charge and was greeted in much the same way. We had placed a 'free' evaluation copy of winzip in our corporate image and built it out on literally thousands of machines. after being told to 'shut-up' I covered my a$$ with a dated email and then from the public library dropped the BSA and win-zip/niko-mak BOTH an email detailing the issue. The company settled with both for a LARGE payment and cleaned the desktop image of any 'grey-ware' that was free for NON-COMMERCIAL use. Unless you are in a position to be held responsible I'd recommend just doing NOTHING, safer career wise in the long run...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  146. Get it in writing by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

    I'd suggest you try to make sure you have written records that you raised this with your bosses (and preferably of the content of their responses too).

    You could do this subtly by, say, raising it via e-mail or memo. If you have to talk to them in person, you can still consider writing an acknowledgement e-mail, along the lines of "Dear , Thank you for the discussion about SOFTWARE LICENSING, on the basis of your instructions I intend to take forward the following actions but understand that the existing software is licensed correctly". Print the e-mail out. That way at least they can't deny that the discussion took place, so if the BSA raid your place you can attempt to demonstrate you tried your best on this issue.

  147. The only question is... by Count+Sessine · · Score: 1

    ... how badly do you need this job?

    First, remind the managers that there's a real legal liability issue at stake. This company that you're working for is literally 1 disgruntled employee away from a BSA audit, a lawsuit, and all sorts of court-imposed damages. If your managers still don't realize that they're sitting on a powder keg, then that's their business and you have to decided whether you want to be a part of this.

    I'd keep working there and keep steering the company toward free alternatives. Why are you using Winzip, for example, when 7zip is not only free, but so much better? But by staying there and knowing about this, you're complicit it all of this.

  148. Drop them in it after you get another job by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    You voiced your concerns so you'll be the number one target if they're reported by anyone. So look for another job and then drop them in the shit.

  149. They will not change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something very similar happened to me, and they will not change their practices unless given an extremely compelling reason to do so (force). The CTO sat in his office torrenting Visual Studio and whatever else the company didn't feel like purchasing. I don't know how many unlicensed copies of Windows XP were running in the server closet. The promise was always that once we got bigger and could afford it, we'd buy everything.

    They cut me loose before that ever happened, and since I can't keep an eye on them anymore (I know, that is extremely self-righteous of me), I handed that responsibility over to the BSA. Call me a disgruntled rat, that's fine, but stealing is stealing. I wasn't brave enough to report them while they still paid me, but without fear of reprisal hanging over my head, I was finally able to make the report. I'm not proud of how it all played out, but it's tough when you're terrified.

    If they know you've got issues with the piracy, you've already been marked. A lot of the responses I'm reading here say "find a new job" like it's no big deal... the fact that you're asking what to do in the first place means it's a huge deal because you've got something invested in the company. Leaving is uncomfortable, to say the least. In this mess, the piracy is bad enough, but then there's the personal aspect -- this is your livelihood, and it's being passed over rather easily by a lot of folks who are examining the larger issue. But keep in mind it may not be your decision to make if you wait too long. My employer threw me out on my head on bogus charges. No surprise.

    Start now: you need to keep documentation of everything. At the very least, when you part ways, you'll have evidence for the BSA (if they care). At the very worst, you'll have evidence for a wrongful termination case if they fire you (if you're fired for complaining about an employer's illegal activities, that employer can get so totally nailed). Get meticulous about it, and create a "chronology"... on such-and-such date I said this, but was refused. And so on. Also, pretend you're on live TV and that everything you email/IM will be read by people in a court room henceforth. If you end up with a case, life will be that much easier for you.

    I know that all sounds like a lot and is rather dramatic, but it really can happen.

    Good luck. =(

  150. Carrot vs. stick by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    When I was faced with this problem in my first job out of college, I tried the "carrot" approach, pointing out that we'd get a user's manual with each legitimate WordPerfect or Lotus 123 license we purchased. Obviously that won't work today.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  151. You need to Calmly Explain Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to explain what Open Source is in clear, understandable language. Make your presentation congenial, NOT condescending.

    1. Learn what Open Source is yourself if you do not already understand it fully from a legal and copyright point of view.
    2. Start your explanation with the Basics: "Open Source, not Open Sores". What is source code? What does having the source available to the public mean if we are just going to install an executable on our PC's, and not do our own development work?
    3. Open Source Software *DOES* have a copyright. (People actually argue that with me) There are hundreds of OS licenses, each granting certain rights. Open source software licenses have been tested in court.
    4. Why is something that is "Open" harder to break into? Concept of peer review. (I use the term Peer Reviewed Software, not Open Source).
    5. Explain the true cost and legal implications of some of the nastier proprietary software licenses and EULA's (Is he really going to show up at 3 am in his pajamas to allow MS/BSA personnel into the offices?) Highlight or draw red circles around certain conditions of the license on or in the actual box.

  152. Issue a (small) PO by id10ts · · Score: 1

    Standrad IANAL disclaimer applies...

    Using the example of WinZip (or any other small dollar software package), just issue a PO (WinZip is $170 for a 10-pack).

    If you can officially let a PO, this is a small enough amount to bring your point to the attention of management without too much fuss.

    If you do not have the official ability to let a PO, you'll definitely make an impression on management. If they follow your convictions, you'll catch a little heat, but you may help open their eyes. If they come after you, it is a small enough amount so as to not be a felony. You also have whistleblower protections on your side, so if they push the issue, it comes back onto them.

    Either way, you need to push forward on this issue. By bringing it to the attention of management, you have effectively painted a target on your back. They could can you for forgetting the paperclip in your pocket as you walk out the door. Bringing the issue up after the fact won't be worth zip. Pushing forward on your convictions now is the only way to keep yourself straight (whether you remain employed by your company or not).

  153. Tell Em About Piratebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Explain that you are an expert on stealing software and can get anything! Make them hire you as a consultant and your job will be never to tell anyone about these things you know..

  154. OpenSource and free software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For once, replace WinZip with 7-zip (also how old are the computers? Windows XP has free built in zip software... so does 2000/ME I think). We also use:

    Skype
    ImgBurn
    OpenProj
    OpenOffice
    FileZilla

  155. One thing I did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started by asking awkward questions like "who do I notify when someone asks for new software to be installed on their computer so we stay compliant?" This of course resulted in all the usual hand-wavy, look-the-other-way non-answers. In an ironic twist, this was at a software development company which used active license tokening technology (think FlexLM-like) to ensure that their product was only used in compliance with the license terms.

    So I dropped the company's legal council a line, asking who would be held responsible if the company was discovered to be using software out of compliance with their licenses.

    After that, I paid $350 of my own money to ask a lawyer not related to the company the same question.

    And based on those two answers, I started looking for another job.

  156. cut a deal and flip on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call the BSA and cut a deal with them to "reward" you for the info and then flip on the company. Use the reward to bridge you to your next job.

  157. Re:get another job (Don't Worry!) by spaceWeepul · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's nearly that serious. As a software developer, I like it when people pay for software. A small company like this will pay for the software if they become successful and get bought. It's obviously sad that they do not take software licensing seriously but I don't think it's ethical to destroy a business just because it takes a cavalier perspective toward licensing. You can offer proposals for licensing (i.e. present quotes from M$ or Nullsoft, etc.) I wouldn't do it too often, though. M$ and Nullsoft offer licensing schemes to help a company like yours become compliant. Someday they will pay for the software and it seems highly unlikely that anyone will sue or prosecute you. Pretend that they are on the "No-Payments-Until-2014" plan.

  158. Do everything else... and then? by Fished · · Score: 1

    So you do everything else... suggest OpenOffice, 7-zip, etc., document the issue, etc., and they still want change. Then what? Simple. Quit, report the bastards to the BSA yourself, and collect a bounty for your trouble. This place is a ticking time bomb that will explode in your face if you stick around. May as well get some money to compensate you for loss of job.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  159. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by inKubus · · Score: 1

    BS. Licensing is and always will be management's responsibility. By management that means accounting. So, just send a list of the number of copies of software and the number of licenses to accounting and let them deal with it. It's the same as paying taxes, or not misstating revenues on an annual report. If they claim the software as an asset they never paid for, that can also bite them big time. But, it's not IT's job to ensure that the copies are licensed, just that accounting knows. Don't worry, they can't do anything to you. Only the company ownership will pay, no matter what. The worst that can happen is you'll get fired afterwards.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  160. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by jemenake · · Score: 1

    I agree. Basically, all you can really do is just CYA. Type up a letter or email to your boss which doesn't necessarily state what you think the company should do. Just have it detail your findings. Something to the effect of "I have only been able to find X legitimate licenses for software 'xyzzy', yet we have Y copies installed. Whether or not we actually purchased Y licenses at some point, we would not be able to demonstrate this if we were ever audited. It would cost $Z to bring us into full compliance with software 'xyzzy'".

    In doing this, you're not taking a position on the matter. You're merely letting the boss know about a potential problem, so you're stand less of a chance of appearing as an anti-piracy crusader. The boss can either act on your information or not. Either way, you'll have documentation that they know and, if funds aren't made available to bring the company into compliance, then I think you'll be less "on the hook".

    Still, your boss probably isn't an idiot. He/she will probably see your letter/e-mail for what it really is: an attempt by you to put them on the hook for this instead of you. (There's a great example of something like this in the Watergate scandal where John Dean was telling Nixon about how the situation was getting very dicey. Nixon then asked Dean to type up a full synopsis of the situation for him in writing. Dean realized that Nixon was going to use that written report to claim that he was unaware of the entire situation until initially receiving the report. THe lesson here is that, any time someone sends a written synopsis of a situation after a history of discussing it informally, there's a good chance that it's being done to have legal evidence that the recipient was aware... in anticipation of the sh*t really hitting the fan). So, I doubt your boss will appreciate your attempt to put them in the crosshairs. So, keep your resume up-to-date.

  161. Audit the systems and then quit by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Audit all the systems so you have an accurate count of what software is intalled and whether or not it's legal. Then quit and call the BSA. The company will be summarily shutdown for pirating software and you'll get a nice reward that you can live on until you find a better job.

    You might want to warn them what the fine is for pirating software and even give them the opportunity to purchase legal copies slowly (a few at a time), but if they continue to tell you to shut your face, just follow the above advice. Chances are, when someone else gets pissed, they'll call the BSA and then you'll still be out of a job and possibly held partly responsible.

  162. I'm a developer. Pirate me long time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a software developer... here's my take.

    #1: Use a torrented piece of software is not stealing, it is not piracy, it is copyright infringement. No one has had money taken from them, they've only lost POTENTIAL dollars earned. Keep in mind, cd sales went up during the time of napster not down... not always a bad thing.

    When i roll out a shareware product I EXPECT it to be pirated ... I also expect a certain % of people will pay for the product after I update the serial keys with each release. It actually helps my exposure because the smart people recommend the product to the not so savvy people... who in turn pay for it.

    #2: Don't pay for 'pirated' software. ever. That IS preventing money from going to developers that have earned it.

    #3: Do what your told within reason or quit. If you don't want to do it, politely state your opposition and ask that someone else do it.

    #4: Cover your own ass. Don't send emails with serial keys, etc.

    #5: Show the BENEFITS of buying legal software. Support from the developers, access to training materials, not having to search for keys each release, etc.

  163. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the best advice anyone here has posted!!!!

    personally if i where a VP of some company and some snot-nosed new hire IT guy came into my office spouting threats
    i would stomp a mud hole in his ass and throw him off the property.

  164. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by hmar · · Score: 1

    The BSA rules for rewards that the person turning in the company was never complicit in the piracy. If he installed any of the pirated software as ordered, he won't get a dime.

  165. The sun rises in the east? by interploy · · Score: 1

    I've yet to work for or hear of a company that didn't pirate software on some level, either through simple reuse of licenses, buying student licenses, or even using key-gens and cracked copies. Unless it's your own business, finding another job where there isn't pirated software is a pipe dream.

    If anon really wants to cut down on company piracy, push open source. And be willing to do most, if not all, of the re-training.

  166. mod parent up by BitHive · · Score: 1

    Too true; the same logic has been used to cast things like the free market, republicans, and the catholic church as beyond reproach.

  167. Re:I don't think that means what you think it mean by mjeffers · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you recognize it but your position here is not that much different from a criminal gang. "Snitches get stiches" and all that.

    It's neither cowardly nor immoral to report someone for breaking the law, especially when not doing so could lead them to scapegoat you. Let the BSA deal with them and laugh all the way to the bank. Pirates deserve what's coming to them.

  168. Business-minded people are smart by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

    Many of these comments assume that the boss is an unethical jerk. My experience is that most business-minded people are both ethical and reasonably smart.

    I suspect that you went to the boss and said "I can't find the licenses", and the boss heard "here comes a lot of cost, for zero benefit, being recommended by the new guy just because he doesn't know where the records are".

    Your approach really should be that you, personally, don't want to do anything unethical. Do you think ANY company in their right mind would NOT want an employee with that attitude?

    So
    a) go on record that you have sought out the licenses and can't find them, and that your boss is sure that they are legally licensed software installations. (Keep in mind that there is NOTHING illegal with installing licensed software and not keeping good records.)

    b) Do your best to HELP the boss get the licensing under control. The Software vendors have really made this a nightmare. Your boss may not know. So present your boss with a software inventory (what's installed), and ask him or her to give a best guess as to how many transferable licenses you have for each software product. Then ask HIM/HER to accept responsibility for that number, and stick within those parameters.

    c) If there's a huge discrepancy between what he's willing to sign off on, and what is needed for the business, put a plan in place to decommission or license the unlicensed software. This is RISK MITIGATION. You can explain the risks to the boss, and recommend the spreading of the costs over a year or two (explaining that the longer the period, the higher the risk), If your budget can't support purchasing licenses, then look for free alternatives. (Look for free alternatives either way,)

    Mostly, you just need to put it in terms of a business proposition. There's a business risk of having poor license-records. You want to get that under control within a fixed period. There should be absolutely NO Issue in getting this under control within 5 years (as most everything will be replaced by then, I would think - just make sure that license records are kept on all new purchases, and nothing new gets installed without license). Your goal should be to make sure that this period of risk is within the company's tolerance level for risk. Can you resolve it within 2 years? 6 months?

    Software license records are like other business risks. There's a price for perfection. Like physical security - SOME risk is ok. You should be working to help minimize the risk over time - not on day 1.

  169. You get rich ... by flibbidyfloo · · Score: 1

    Report them to the BSA at https://reporting.bsa.org/usa/home.aspx and make a boatload of reward money. Then start looking for another job as you wait a couple years for your check while they sort it all out.

  170. I'm amazed by jdbausch · · Score: 1

    I am constantly amazed at the relationship the average slashdotter has with management. it looks something like this: slashdotter : always has the right answer / opinion management : to stupid to see / understand / do what I said. obviously this is NOT reality. In my opinion the typical reason for this sort of relationship is poor communication from the technical side. I've worked with HUNDREDS of management teams, and yes there are certainly inept or incompetent ones. But to the original poster, as an IT pro, it is your job to couch technical needs/issues in terms a businessman can appreciate. So please disregard what so many people here are telling you about not being able to get management to do anything here... here is what you need to do: Document ALL available licenses, regardless of how old (as in old unused versions - sometimes will show them what they thought they bought is no longer used). talk to accounting, and have them find ALL purchase records, even if there are NO physical media, licenses, etc. You need to have every scrap of info, so you can then ask "what am I missing? when your boss says they bought it already. Document ALL installed software (ocsinventory-ng is a great tool for this) Suggest options, with costs associated. (as indicated by previous posters, 7zip, and OO.O, are options, or they can pay the licenses OR compare that to what a BSA audit could cost, and how easily it could come) Once you have clarified it all, my guess is that a reasonable decision will be made. It might not happen immediately, but you should be able to spec a project to phase the changes in. I once had a client who was similarly refusing to pay for software, despite my warnings "this could be a problem" and "you aren't licensed for this". I continued to install unlicensed versions, largely due to inexperience, and "the customer is always right" attitude. They got a threatening letter from the BSA, and quickly turned to me and said "we'll you are taking care of this for us, so how could we be out of compliance". I basically converted them to the FOSS shown in this thread, and made them buy the rest. MAde sure all was kosher, and then said see ya. lessons learned. I simply am unwilling to be out of compliance now, for my personal sanity. because once you wave multiple $250k fines in someones face, they will look for a scape goat somewhere... you need to be ahead of the game on this. Had I done my job, and PROPERLY instructed them on the risks of their decisions, it would never have gone down like it did. These folks were douchey, but I believe that had I expressed the needs correctly the situation would never have occurred, because at the end of the day they are businesspeople, and money talks.

    1. Re:I'm amazed by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed by your inability to use paragraphs. If you poke through the comments, you'll find roughly 3 camps: the OSS freaks who want to replace everything with OSS versions, disruption be damned, the people who assume management is using the IT guy as a fall guy and is in on the scam, and the ones who ran into a boss who didn't realize what they were in for.

      Screw the first camp - this is not the time to go advocate OSS. The second camp is well advised to go get a different job. The third camp gets to do some good in the world and make friends with the big boss.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  171. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Submit purchase requests thru your company's proper channels for the needed software/legally required licenses.
    2. If that doesn't work, look for a new job.
    3. Once you have a new job, call the BSA.

  172. Leave, call BSA by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 1

    1. Find new job.
    2. call BSA.

    They'll never learn otherwise. I am normally loathe to suggest involving BSA as they are generally scumbags who go after businesses trying to do the right thing and just want their money. But if this company really is doing what you say they deserve it. Not like they can say they didn't know and you didn't warn them.

  173. In Portugal... by holiggan · · Score: 1

    ...in those cases, top management can be criminally responsible and spend jail time (up to 3 years) for pirated software. Don't laugh, I'm serious. The proverbial hammer doesn't just fall on the person responsible for IT, it falls straight into the manager/ceo/big fish of the company as well.

    It was a really nice way to make the people with responsibility open the eyes for the problem, instead of just blaming the small guy.

    If I ever need to draw attention to the problem of pirated software, and the "boss" just dismisses me, I can just whisper "3 years in jail for you if we are caught"... That should give full attention ehehehe

    --
    "A sysadmin is a cross between a detective, a police officer, a gardener, a doctor and a fireman"
  174. call the bsa and you can get up to 1m for turning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    call the bsa and you can get up to 1m for turning them in.

  175. Document, and suggest options by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    "What does one do when a good portion of the application software at your workplace is pirated? Bringing this up did not endear me at all to the president of the company. I was given a flat "We don't pirate software," and "We must have paid for it at some point." Given that [examples...] What do you when management ignores this?"

    Others have already suggested it, but I'll say it again: document the instances. But suggest alternatives. I don't know what you said to the president, or how you said it, but the president is going to want to hear suggestions - not just "complaining" that the company uses pirated software. Remember that your president is focused on the company's bottom line, and if he/she feels that they can scrape by while using pirated software, they will turn a blind eye to piracy. You need to frame this as way to save money, not just spending money. Avoid mentioning the BSA - that will look like a "threat".

    You didn't say what your role was at the company. Are you a sysadmin, LAN/desktop admin, or CIO? Your level really identifies the scope of your actions, but doesn't change what you should do.

    (Note: if you are none of these things, i.e. your job doesn't involve responsibility for software, the president probably doesn't want to hear this from you. Go talk to one of the admins or the CIO instead of the president, let them take it from there.)

    Inventory the software in use on all the systems ... how many installs of Windows, how many copies of MS Office, Acrobat, Photoshop, etc. Put this in a spreadsheet, date it, print it out, stick it in a file.

    Next, inventory your licenses. Focus on the software licenses you know you paid for. If you think something is pirated, the best you should do is put "??" or "cannot locate" in the "license code" field. Put all this in the same spreadsheet, so you can match up how many valid licenses you have of MS Office, etc. compared to how many are deployed. Date it, print it, put it in your file.

    Sounds like you've already done this, or at least are on the path. So let's focus on the next steps ...

    Are there any $0 alternatives to the software that you think is being used without a valid license? Start looking into these options. Others here have suggested some $0 alternatives for you to use. Just be sure to check the license - sometimes, software may be "free for personal or educational use", which means business need to pay for it. Avoid being too dramatic - while I'm a Linux advocate, this is not the time to suggest moving the company from Windows desktops to Linux. Instead, find free Windows programs to replace the shareware/commercial Windows programs. OpenOffice instead of MS Office, 7Zip instead of WinZip, etc. You may need to write up a separate analysis that compares the features of the commercial software with the free software. Make it short, but identify each software completely. (If you use screenshots, no more than 1 screenshot per program.) Use tables rather than lots of text to talk about it. For example: a list of features that your users actually use/want and a check mark to indicate if this feature is present in the (pirated) software you have vs the free software options.

    Create a new document, where you can summarize the inventory of software in use, and the inventory of your licenses. Just state the facts plainly, simply. Don't put in any personal statements, let the numbers speak for themselves. Make sure to call out where the company is using software where you don't have enough licenses. Include an estimated cost to "true up" on the licenses. Identify in your document the $0 alternatives you have discovered. The important step will be to highlight these as savings to the company. Identifying as "savings" will make it more actionable. Ideally, you'll put these in a column next to the "true up" cost, so it's obvious.

    Again, date it, print it, put it in your file. Also, share this document with the CIO

  176. Time for a new job by snoig · · Score: 2, Informative

    As someone who has been there and done that, my advice is to start activly looking for a new job today. It's one thing if management doesn't know what's going on but it's different if they know and don't care. In my case, I mentioned in several meetings that I needed to get legal and when my next review came around they needed someone with a different skill set. My two reviews before that were above average. The point is that if they are to cheap to get legal they are also to cheap to give you raises and support you and your job in other ways. Other places where I have worked that had no pirated software policies in place also had HR policies in place for cost of living and merit raises that were fair to the employee. Just get out of that place as fast as you can and you will be glad you did.

  177. Nothing YET... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah sit back and do what you are told till they either fire you, cut your position, force you to leave or deny you a pay raise. Then when the time is right report them with strong evidence to https://reporting.bsa.org.

    Cheers!

    Oh and make sure you have another job lined up before you do that. Burning bridges makes it harder to get another job.

  178. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree....Most CEO's play stupid until the stuff hits the fan and then blames the IT Dept. Because they're the ones in charge of keeping track of it and making sure the companies legal. Your in a catch 22...the CEO won't let you correct the issue because of the cost and you get it in the neck if you don't. My advise......Find a new job and leave before you get hashed...cheers!

  179. When Can an Employee Disobey? by Scribbler'sEmporium · · Score: 1

    When Can an Employee Disobey? Adjudicators support management's rights to direct employees, but have concluded that some situations permit the employee to refuse to obey. They can refuse IF: #1 the order would have placed the employee in danger and contravenes the Labour Code #2 the order was to commit an illegal act - such as being told not to enforce the Act for a particular company #3 the order was not job related - such as running personal errands for the supervisor ************** See #2.

  180. Fines are issuable to your personally also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of you that are telling him to do it and just ignore it are idiots. If you knowingly install pirated software not only is the company liable for fines, but the installer is responsible for fines of 15k per offense personally. I work at a large corporation and my job is software compliance. At this point they either get compliant or you have to report them. Not reporting a crime can land you as much hot water as doing the actual crime.

  181. Business Software Alliance Reward by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

    Find new job, report old employer, get reward https://reporting.bsa.org/usa/rewardsconditions.aspx .

  182. Assurance contracts by tepples · · Score: 1

    If I build a house, I get paid by the people who use it.

    You get paid once, not every time they walk in the door.

    If I put the same effort into, say, a film script, that might take anywhere from 6 weeks to a year to write, why should people get it for free?

    On the other hand, why should you still be earning money from a film script after you're dead? It's possible to make the revenue structure for a film script (or any other published work) match that for building a house: see assurance contracts and The Contingency Market. You put a bounty on your work, and once you attract enough pledges, you get paid for licensing the work Freely.

  183. Perform your own audit by FreeBSD+evangelist · · Score: 1

    There are several free (or one-time use) software audit tools available. Download them from below and run them. Then give the output reports to your CIO and/or CFO. Keep copies for yourself, and document that you did the audits.

    This is not a matter to shrug off. I used to work at a company that got fined $40,000 for not being able to document our licenses. I actually believe we were in compliance, but we couldn't prove it.

    http://www.bsa.org/country/Tools%20and%20Resources/Free%20Software%20Audit%20Tools.aspx
    http://www.bsa.org/country/Tools%20and%20Resources/For%20Employers.aspx

  184. Microsoft Access as a platform by tepples · · Score: 1

    The retraining needed for moving to the current version of OpenOffice is no greater than moving to a new version MS Office from an older one except for the transition away from Access.

    And guess what database program a lot of small businesses use as a platform on which to build their operations. For example, the popular Stone Edge Order Manager is a VBA app that runs on Microsoft Access, using either a Jet back-end or an SQL Server Express back-end.

  185. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Write a formal letter to the head of the department and ask that he signs it. In short: CYA

  186. USe 7 Zip freeware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of the other one...

  187. Well, there was your first error: by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

    Your first error was taking this job without making it clear you do not pirate software and will not install and support pirated software on company systems. I'm a consultant who makes this very clear when I come in to a new customer, and although I've lost a few potential customers, my serious customers have understood and respected this.

    The first thing I do is explain that I will not report them to the BSA-mafia or anyone else. I will simply not install pirated software or support it if the fact that it's not legal will cause problems (for example, if I need to install updates or reinstall an application to solve an issue). Next, I explain to them the issues of what software piracy will do to their computer environment: how many cracks and other such workarounds tend to be unstable, or often trojaned, that they prevent updates and upgrades from working, and that I cannot have access to official support for such software. Finally I will suggest a progressive plan to buy legal licenses, to work with their budget to correct their situation progressively. I will often suggest alternative software (either cheaper versions or FOSS software), explaining the drawbacks and advantages of each solution. Working with schools specifically, I make sure they are aware of the educational pricing they can get on a lot of commercial software, and will point them to organizations that resell used computers to such institutions.

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  188. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Precisely, take the advice of a hardened office worker, in the corporate world if you want to stay out of trouble CYA, leave a paper trail, get signatures, send memos, print stuff and take a copy home, sounds illegal, probably is, but when you get into trouble and stuff suddenly disappears, you have a backup in your desk at home, saved me about half a year's pay that, because someone older advised me about a lot of that crap. Looking back, I should have left when I had the chance, but the pay is good, now, because of this crisis I have no other alternative. And remember one think when you confront your boss, you work for that weekly/monthly wage not out of some misplaced loyalty, when something threatens that pay-check, it's time to leave.

  189. Legit software or your job ? by Latinhypercube · · Score: 1

    So would you rather they have legit software OR you have a job ? Since the cost of the software is probably > than you.

  190. Contact an employment attorney first, then BSA... by swb · · Score: 1

    I'd contact an employment attorney first and figure out what my options were when the boss fired me after I ratted him out to the BSA, and depending on the attorney or practice, have them document what your potential legal exposure may be if you turn the business in.

    It may be possible to have the attorney contact the BSA anonymously on your behalf; your work with the attorney is protected as privileged communication so they may not be able to find out who turned them in, even if the BSA wanted to tell them.

    At least this way you'd know what you'd be up against and would have everything lined up in case the employer tried to retaliate. In some cases you may be able to set them up so that you *want* them to retaliate so you can respond with a civil action.

  191. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employme by Exception+Duck · · Score: 1

    Yes, take example of a company that sows clothes,

    20 employees
    3 who use a computer

    Business is struggling

    But OH NO of the 3 computers, 2 use Excel, but they only have a license for 1 Excel copy.

    One uses Excel more then once per week.

    SUE THE BASTARDS!!!!

  192. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been in a similar situation, although less clear cut. (A lost site license, but in this case it probably was a lost site license, and I didn't get stonewalled by the boss.)
    I've asked myself this question a few times. Don't do anything you know to be illegal. Ever. That said, if you're not sure, and the boss says go, get it written down (email's OK) and do. If they don't start heading towards legit licensing then work towards getting the hell out.
    But if asked to do something clearly illegal (as in the OP), tell them you won't do it. Tell the boss, no, that's illegal. Make it clear that you consider the request protected by confidentiality (ie, make sure you aren't threatening), but make it clear you won't be assisting in the commission of a crime.
    Draw the line in the sand, and make it clear where you stand. Don't quit over it. If they have no legit work to do, then let them sack you. But there's too many legal nightmares in disclosing info about a workplace's policies or directions.
    end my 2 cents

  193. Outlaw unions by mi · · Score: 1

    Unions are nothing more than big babysitters now.

    They are a lot worse than that. Enterprises, whose explicit goals are maintaining and raising the prices of their members' services, what are they, but the cartels? Why is it, that most of the society wants pizzerias and plumbers to compete, but sympathize with workers, who want to stop competing? Why aren't they subject to the anti-trust laws?.. Why is it, that when their violent members break the law, they aren't treated under Federal anti-racketeering legislation?

    They are objectively bad for economy and the country too... But most of all, they are illegal under the already-existing legislation — at least, under the spirit of it:

    Competition law, known in the United States as antitrust law, has three main elements:

    • prohibiting agreements or practices that restrict free trading and competition between business entities. This includes in particular the repression of cartels.
    • banning abusive behavior by a firm dominating a market, or anti-competitive practices that tend to lead to such a dominant position. Practices controlled in this way may include predatory pricing, tying, price gouging, refusal to deal, and many others.
    • supervising the mergers and acquisitions of large corporations, including some joint ventures. Transactions that are considered to threaten the competitive process can be prohibited altogether, or approved subject to "remedies" such as an obligation to divest part of the merged business or to offer licenses or access to facilities to enable other businesses to continue competing.
    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Outlaw unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  194. THE Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I QUIT! I quit on my one year anniversary. I wrangled myself into a 4 hrs per day contract for 4 months as a trainer. They paid me out at 3 months. Best move ever.

    Although to be honest the software piracy was a minor factor in the decision to quit... they were daily screwing over their own workers. I was instructed to alter timesheets and cut valid worked time on a regular basis from half an hour to almost two hours. I'd argue but I would do it. And then I'd fix it after. Never got caught. At one branch there were 900 'grunt' user accounts on the SCO (got I hate admining SCO) server over a 4 year period for a daily average of 20 'grunt' workers on the floor. And since these accounts would be reused, that turns out to be more than 1 person let go per day. Upward mobility in the company was determined by a willingness to adopt certain principles. I'm amazed I was promoted as far as I was.

    My only FOSS success (out of many attempts) at that company was PuTTY over a very expired piece of shareware. Subtle changes in appearances (a yellow telephone icon) got me yelled at from a manager who spends most of her day hiding in her office writing erotica....

  195. We're not all kiddies by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    If I build a house, I get paid by the people who use it.

    No, no, no. That's a very misleading way to think about it.

    If you build a house, you get paid by the people who asked you to build it (who may or may not be the same people who end up living there). They hire you to perform a service, and once that service is done, you no longer have any connection to that house.

    If I put the same effort into, say, a film script, that might take anywhere from 6 weeks to a year to write, why should people get it for free?

    They shouldn't. Just like with the house, you should demand payment from the people who asked you to write it.

    But no one asked you to write it, you say? You just decided to do it on your own? Well then, I guess you'll need to think of a different business model.

    If you build a house of your own accord, you can make money by selling that house -- in that case, you're not really being paid for your labor, you're selling an object. Likewise, if you write a film script of your own accord, you can make money by selling that script (that is, a stack of papers, or a CD-ROM containing a file). But that means you can't go around showing it to everyone before you've been paid, because they'll have no need to buy a copy from you if they already have enough information to make their own copy.

    Interesting how the kiddies who've never had to work for a living thing they should get everything for free and don't have the backbone to produce anything worthwhile in exchange. They're the real users or AOLusers -- use and use and too impotent to produce on their own.

    For the record, I've been a professional developer for ten years (as well as a freeware and OSS developer). I like to think I've produced plenty that's worthwhile: during PAX 2009 I was pleased to see a girl in dragon wings stand up at a panel Q&A and mention a freeware project I've worked on; the software I've been writing for my day job is the first in its niche and has attracted the interest of some major domestic and international players.

    But I suspect you'd still classify me as one of those "kiddies" because I believe copyright should be abolished. I've managed to earn a living as a programmer without relying on the ability to limit copying, and if I can do it, I'm pretty sure you can too.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  196. I'm no Machiavelli, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Boss is such a sociopath, he will choose option C: Go to the BSA first, leaving you holding the bag.

  197. Been there, done that by FrozenGeek · · Score: 1

    I ran into pretty much that same situation a few years ago. I had a long conversation with a friend of mine (retired CEO of a large multinational). He recommended that I bring the issue to the attention of the company president and, if things were not made legal, quit immediately. I followed his advice. It sucked to be me. OTOH, I was legally clear and slept well at night.

    If you continue working there, knowing that piracy is occurring, you stand in the cross-hairs if one of the software vendors gets uppity. Even worse, you might wind up being your employer's scape goat.

    Get out of Dodge.

    --
    linquendum tondere
  198. Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) A house is a physical products, software isn't. They are different things, stop equating them! 2)We do not live in a communist society, the amount of work you do doesn't have anything to do with the amount of money you make. A good innovative idea can be worth much more than 5 years work in a factory, maybe not fair but that is how it works. 3)Let's suppose for the sake of argument that the amount of work does matter. How fucking dare you compare building a house to making software! Did you ever build a house? Well I have and I you didn't because otherwise you wouldn't be saying this. Why don't you get out of your comfortable chair behind your computer and step out of your white-collar bubble for a day and see what real work consists of because you've obviously never done any yourself.

  199. Blackmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technically it's blackmail.

    The difference is that it may be 'the right thing' to do, as the police is supposed to be the good guys.

    But though it's OK to do it, it's still blackmail.

  200. What should you do? by kimvette · · Score: 1

    What does one do when a good portion of the application software at your workplace is pirated?

    Make him read articles which show how much inadvertant copyright infringement has cost companies, and mention that he's doing it willfully so the BSA members would show absolutely no mercy in his case.

    Nevertheless I have been called on to install dubious software on multiple occasions.

    Are you an engineer? If so you had to have taken ethics at some point. The answer is obvious: refuse to contribute to their felonious actions.
    Need office, but don't want to pay for it? Show him OpenOffice.org and KOffice. If you want "free" software, choose free software. Don't "steal"[sic] encumbered software.

    A CD-R is not proof of purchase -- obviously. Hell, during BSA raids they don't even consider a CoA to be proof of purchase.

    As for shareware, what strategies do you use to convince management to allow the purchase of commonly used utilities?

    osalt.

    Need Winzip? Check out 7zip.

    If an installation of WinZip reports thousands of uses, I think the software developer deserves a bit o' coin for it.

    Yeah, or the owner of the business needs to pay a fine or go to jail.

    When I told management that WinZip has a timeout counter that counts off one second per file previously opened, they tried to implement a policy of wait for it, do something else, and come back later, rather than spend the money.

    . . . which is more costly than paying for the software.

    Also, some software is free for home and educational use only, like AVG Free. What do you when management ignores this?

    You document it, inform your manager they have no choice but to correct the issue, and blow the whistle to the BSA and to the copyright holders. When they fire you in retaliation, bring all the documentation to a good attorney and collect a minimum of several years' salary. Not paying a few thousand for software will cost your boss hundreds of thousands in statutory fines PLUS several years of your salary when he retailiates by firing you.

    Copyright holders get their due. You get paid time off, and the unethical businessman is put out on the street and his business will probably be siezed and/or closed down. Everybody wins!

    Why "steal"[sic] software when there are free alternatives that do the job perfectly well?

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  201. white lie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps your boss could be swayed by white lie?
    "Microsoft is going to quietly roll out an automatic update on all operating systems that will check for illegal software, and deem it unusable after 90 days of continued use."

    I don't go as far as saying that at my job, but i just simply go with the frank "well I have a CD for it and _can_ install it, but without a legit key, the software just won't work."

  202. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by kimvette · · Score: 1

    That said, it's not your job to make policy, nor is it your responsibility to protect the financial interests of the publishers of the software in question.

    It may not be his job to protect financial interests of would-be vendors, but it is his ethical obligation to ensure that his employer is not violating the law, and it is in his own personal best interest to refuse to install "pirated"[sic] software, since he would be sharing in the liability if/when BSA members find out.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  203. Slowly migrate them to legit software by moxley · · Score: 1

    If this truly bothers you, then start looking for a new job.

    I have been in this situation, and here is how I handled it:

    I used free alternatives where possible, and explained the security risk and other issues associated with pirated sofware, then I explained that pirated software isn't really free when you consider the security risks and and support issues it creates. It costs more than a lot of people realize; but I am also a realist and not anal about that kind of stuff - so I am not going to sweat it if I can't see licensing details for a copy of acrobat - then again though, I work for a small company, and they're great about paying for things that are supposed to be paid for.

    Between developer programs and other special deals (like academic versions, etc) you can always usually find a way to get legit software at an affordable price.

    Personally I think that ratting them out to the BSA is fucked unless they screw you over or expect you to obtain pirated software or something like that. Sometimes people just don't realize the deal when it comes to software licensing, and educating them is better than ratting them out.

    Especially because it's always possible that the president of the company is correct that some of it was paid for at some point. I guess my attitude is that unless you KNOW it was pirated, and see telltale signs of that, as long as you feel your workplace is treating you fairly and doesn't balk at paying for appropriate software going forward, I wouldn't wory about it.

  204. WinZip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to understand why anyone still uses WinZip. Recent Windows releases' Explorer understands the zip file format, and even if you think that's insufficient you have e.g. 7zip which supports multiple formats and is completely open source.

  205. User your time machine by pushf+popf · · Score: 1

    And go back to before you opened your trap where you should have kept it closed.

    First, assuming you're not responsible for license management, you should have ignored it. It's simply not your responsibility any more than it is for you to go inspect registrations in the motor pool.

    However this particular cat is out of the bag. I'd suggest finding a different job or hoping that the company replaces the president (whichever you think would be faster) since your chances for advancement are now zero.

    The most valuable lesson you can learn in or out of work is "when to keep your mouth shut." Some things require immediate action (like if you found out that your company was sweetening their products with antifreeze) and other things require "not noticing" (like software licensing) if you plan on keeping your job. Licence management is the company's problem, they can either purchase the correct licenses and not worry or use stolen software and run the risk of being caught. In either case, it's not your responsibility unless you've specifically been tasked with license management. There is no "up side" to doing anything about it, since telling your boss or his superiors will make them angry or nervous, and telling the vendor will get you fired when they figure out who squealed.

    Now if they want you to obtain or install stolen software, that's a horse of a different color, but even then, I wouldn't walk in and accuse anybody of theft, I'd just say "Sorry, it's not worth the risk." One of the things you can't ever get back is virginity. Once you install the stolen software, you're in it with the rest of them.

  206. Ethics; Compliance; Job Security by Xiozhiq · · Score: 1

    What's at issue here? There are legal, personal, and ethical reasons for doing a number of things here, and as IT personnel, it's your job to plot a path through this mess. You know there are wrongs, and those should stop. You know what would be right, and it's your job to ensure that happens (and sooner, rather than later).

    So what do you do? Well, first off, keep everything on record, via e-mail BCC'd to one (or twenty, if you're paranoid) personal e-mail accounts you set up specifically for the purpose of documenting this.

    First, you need to inventory what's going on. How many machines do you have, what software are they running? How many licenses do you have? Make a database of all of your licenses.

    Secondly, it's your obligation via your position (as well as ethically) to let your employer know what's going on. It needs to be completely transparent to them what the current situation is, and how illegally the company is currently operating. If your boss is an unethical jerk; it's your job to tell HIS boss (if it's that large of a company) what's going on. Tell everyone who might get their ass kicked by the BSA what's going on. Yeah, they probably should know. But it's your job to make damn sure they do.

    Third, propose options for fixing what's wrong. It'd be a lot easier on you to report them to the BSA, collect a fat check (maybe?), and go to Tahiti. It'd take some real gusto to actually break out a bucket o' elbow grease and fix this stuff. Find out what software you have and do an analysis if you really need it all. You mention Office, Acrobat, WinZip, and AVG, most of which have previously mentioned FOSS replacements. No, they won't be as *good*, but they will be legal, and in most cases they will do all that you need them to do. They will also be less likely to contain malware / keyloggers / other crap that I'm sure your employers would rather forego dealing with. You might even be able to find some commercial, non main-brand replacements for some apps (I recall some companies making PDF creators / editors that don't cost an arm and a leg, and will probably get the job done).

    What were you hired for? Your company counts on you to:

    1) make sure everything works so that business can continue
    2) make sure everything is legal & licensed
    3) minimize the cost of running the IT department while maximizing value

    It's that last step that can lead people to consider employing unethical practices. We all want to save a couple of bucks. If you want to do your job and be able to look yourself in the mirror, you need to do everything you can to enact a swift transition to new practices. By all means, cover your ass by documenting your efforts and if need be quit your job & report the company, but try to do your job as much as you can before you resort to that drastic measure.

    In my opinion, you'll be a hero if you can suggest some sort of a compromise that won't kill your company, but still make them legal. No, you can't go and uninstall every illegal piece of software right away, because the company will go under from a loss of productivity. But do try everything you can to fix the situation, write up a nice and pretty report that you can cc to all company management that gives them a good idea of what's going on (make sure to give them a summary that explicitly states the urgency of the situation), and for jc's sake put all the work you do on your resume.

    In the end, you're doing this job for yourself. Don't accept the morals of the lowest common denominator, try to raise the lowest common denominator. Do some real good and bring another company up to compliance. People like you who want to do what's right are rare, and people who are willing to work 16 hour days for a week to get this done ASAP are even rarer. Work your butt off for a little while to bring more than just problems to your management, help them by bringing them solutions too.

    What'll make you feel better? Sinking your company and dozens of jobs because of ignorant management, or convincing that management that you're doing everything you can to save them money and act legally, potentially saving the company and all those jobs from disappearing with one BSA report?

  207. Commercial Software Vendors Look the Other Way by mpapet · · Score: 1

    I'm not negating doing the right thing and getting in compliance.

    I'm stating a simple fact. A commercial software provider would *much* rather you not pay for their software and use it. Why? Because they know if you get used to it, chances are very high you will become a paying customer.

    Why exactly do you think it's the case that breaking most anti-copying schemes is a PITA, but not impossible? As examples, Microsoft and Adobe could *both* go to hardware dongles and not be *immediately* harmed. What would happen is other software vendors would then become the cracked standard in Office/Graphics whatever and from then on out, Adobe and Microsoft's software market share would decline. Too much BSA enforcement would do the same thing.

    So, most of you, like the author of the question, are in fear of a situation that is very unlikely to occur. Do your CYA and plan an orderly exit if you don't care for these kinds of ethics. But don't live in perpetual fear of the compliance boogeyman BSA.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  208. depends by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    If they're pirating Microsoft software, then you should gleefully comply. Because Microsoft is the devil and they deserve to get ripped off.

    If they're pirating shareware software then you should report your bosses. Because your bosses are the devil and the shareware authors deserve to be paid.

    Thus sayeth the wisdom of /.

  209. You're a classic example of PEBKAC. by alizard · · Score: 1

    PEBKAC means "Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair". Like quite a few thousand other people, I've used OO for years without difficulty.

  210. Unmentioned scenario here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't particularly want to read through hundreds of comments on this subject, but there is another possibility in this case.

    It's possible the boss isn't lying. As I understand it, the way many office applications are pirated in the first place is that they are sometimes from companies using blanket business licenses. This allows the same key to be used over and over in the wild without being as suspicious as a single user license being used repeatedly.

    So it could be that someone in the organization in question was the culprit for the Google-able CD key and possibly even the copy of the software itself. Granted this is a scenario with a rather low probability as the easier explanation is more often than not correct. However, seeing as how many of the responses included accusations towards management/threats of going to the authorities/etc, I thought it might be prudent to point out this possibility to the query.

    At any rate, it sounds like quite the dilemma.

  211. Develop a strategy by Coltman · · Score: 1

    Why is it all the advice is 'find a new job' or 'suck it up, and do what your told' and 'Your boss is the devil'.

    When I started at my current situation, pirated software was rampant. It was really a situation that should not have happened but it was a person trying to save the company money. The cost to instantly convert the entire company over to licensed software would have severly cripled the company.

    Together with the finance department we developed a strategy that allowed for licensed software for every new station and if new person started at a station we would buy a new license. On top of that we developed stategies to eliminate or reduce the software necessary, such as using a custom web application instead of an Access based system. IT department also stepped up the station turn over as alot of the existing stations were more than 2 years old.

    In a short time we had removed the unlicensed software, and now have a better handle on who needs which software.

    It is all about communication. Develop a strategy, and find ways for the company to remove the unlicensed software so neither you nor your company are in jeopardy of being in the unemployment line.

    --
    - my $.02? - you can't have it...it's all I have!!
  212. Why don't you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quit being such a whining cry-baby?

    If you're so gung-ho over statue enforcement, start with yourself. Turn yourself in every time you exceed the speed limit. Let's see how far that goes.

  213. Educate while looking for another job by managerialslime · · Score: 1
    First, it is up to you to do your best to educate your executives about the real risks of disgruntled former employees turning in your employer in return for a portion of the damages they will be held liable for.

    If your employer truly does not have money for MS Office and the like, it is up to you to present the free and inexpensive legal alternatives to 99% of what most users need. (For the rest of the stuff, either pay or accept the risk of shut down.)

    If the ethics of your employer are that it is OK to screw your software vendors, there is every probability that they will eventually take other actions not in the interests of their employees, their customers, or their own long-term financial security.

    You think Bernie Madoff STARTED big time? No, he got away with little stuff and eventually became the monster that ruined so many lives.

    I've become a moralizing old fart and I feel just fine about it.

    --
    Live Long and Prosper - Thanks Leonard. You are missed.
  214. Do what I did. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a new job and send a notice to the BSA.

  215. As mentioned earlier CYA by schizz69 · · Score: 1

    I feel that the best option is to document the use of pirated software, arrange a meeting with the stake holders and discuss options. If they reply "we are going to use it anyway" refuse to install it on any new machines. This is not reusing to do your job, this is refusing to break the law for your boss. I doubt any judge in the country will fall on the employers side in an employment dispute if it comes to that.

  216. CYA. by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    Write something - whatever is typical in your workplace - to your direct supervisor about this issue.

    Explain the possible financial (and criminal, if any, I have no idea) repercussions.

    Ask permission to gather software utilization statistics and determine a cost to put things right. Don't run off and take inventory of installed software, and don't work up a price at this point.

    Save a copy for yourself.

    And get on with doing what you're told.

    If you don't like what you're being told to do, find another job.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  217. Do the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call in the authorities and leave the company.

  218. Document Everything by PCWizardsinc · · Score: 1

    Email is legally considered admissible in court as evidence. Get your boss telling you to install the software, express your concerns. Get it in email, export the PST with all the tracking. Cover yourself, then start looking for another job.

  219. My two cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peazip replaces winzip, and Microsoft now has a free av (security essentials) that works better than trend micro for me, I still need trend micro for my servers. As for office we stuck with office 2003 that we have enough licenses for. They really like outlook at my work and as much as people say how well other email apps work there are plugins we use for outlook like salesbuilder and outlook connects correctly to exchange (as long as you have a vpn or are inside our network). and I still have failed to find a good exchange replacement for contacts, calendar, and using ad to allow access to calendars. This would be really nice if we had a drop in outlook and exchange that uses the exchange protocal so I could get away from it without anyone noticing. I'd like to replace outlook first so i could replace office with something like open office which we use for lab computers. Evolution in my experiances is even buggier than outlook. It crashed and would be too unresponsive for too long and it would mess up all the time. Both in windows and in my os of choice linux. Maybe I'll come back to it in a few years and try it again with the exchange plugin. But the calendar and contacts are important and not to be glossed over with simple replacements. It needs to work with exchange for now.

  220. BonysGambit by BonysGambit · · Score: 1

    So let me see if I get the general drift of most of your comments right: Without societies, censors or authority over us, we're all immoral and unethical? What happened to individual choice? All you guys out there (used in a non-sexist way) are telling me that stealing is okay, provided you, taking the best suggestion I read before I stopped in horror, that you document your going along with it to simply CYA? If I found myself in this position, I would take part of that same suggestion to document the whole problem. I'd make a list of all the software which should be bought to make the company legal. Present it to the boss. And if he doesn't instantly implement a plan to acquire it, look for another job if you need the paycheck - else resign immediately. Morals, ethics and honesty - you have them or you don't and there's almost no ambiguity about it (you may be forgiven for stealing a slice of bread to feed your hungry child). This philosophy still seems to me to be the best going: do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

  221. The simple way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This really depends on what your relationship with your boss is. If they're the kind of person who you can have a short informal chat with then this is the way to go:

    You simply have to gently and informally approach them and point out that the issue you raised might be serious. Explain that you don't want to start going around accusing people or getting the company a bad rep internally, but you are worried in case you get audited. Explain that everyone involved could be held accountable. Explain that you're worried because you could lose your credentials and of course the company could get hit for a lot of cash and heads could roll (but of course primary concern is that you can be personally injured in this - it shows your honest about your own motivations cause the managerial mindset is to not expect altruism). Basically just put across the point that you're watching your back and the bosses.

    Again this is about knowing what the boss is like, and this may be entirely useless to you. But the way I see it, if you can get the issue resolved without any major hassle, or threatening, then you're going to get a reputation as a problem fixer and that's never a bad thing.

  222. Join The Pirate Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joining the Pirate Party and fighting for the human rights to share knowledge would be a good idea.

    Corporations hypocrisy proves that the laws of mathematics and physics can not be violated.

    consult EFF and Doctorov or Lessig, they will understand.

  223. DOUBLE STANDARDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    France is known for its three-strike offending policy.

    GROUPAMA, a large French insurer, was caught in a software PIRACY case of $200m.

    In its affidavit, GROUPAMA argued that BANK SECRECY entitled it to limit the scope of Police investigations to a building that was not the place where evidences about the infraction were officially collected.

    GROUPAMA managed to have the General Prosecutor of Paris to state that Police was 'right' to ignore the criminal file:

    http://remoteanything.com/archives/groupama.pdf

    Can you spell 'double standards' in French?

  224. Re:Contact the BSA AFTER you secure other employme by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

    A poorly aimed cumshot at the end of a hand job can get a virgin preggers...

  225. I am in shock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, software piracy requires moral indignation, blackmailing the offender, calling the authorities, and suggesting free alternatives. While music and movie piracy is a god-given right because copyright is a broken system. Have I gotten the general gist of things here correctly?

  226. For shame by remmelt · · Score: 1

    That's rich. First you disregard the correct terms the law has set for copyright infringement and theft of property, then you admonish people for not obeying that same law. All without the use of proper punctuation!

  227. I've been down this road... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been down this road. I took a middle of the road approach and kept reminding my direct manager about the issue. The development manager had been through a BSA audit at another company and convinced upper management they had a problem, so we made some changes. In the end it didn't matter, the CEO legally took the bulk of the money and we went bankrupt. My advise, find another job.

  228. Simple : play by their rules by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

    How about you simply do the sociopath thing for yourself ? Report them, collect the reward. If you want to be able to honestly say you didn't do it, have your wife report them and collect the reward.

    You should not allow criminals to dictate the rules, which will obviously immunize them from responsibility for anything. You'll get fired, frustrated, and nothing will be solved. Instead, you should use the rules they set for themselves : report them (which makes you feel better), and don't tell them (which they don't do either). You should not feel guilty about this.

    Oh and, needless to say, once you reported them, you've done your duty. Keep your mouth shut after that. Don't report them from inside the office either. Plan ahead to mention the unfairness of stealing software 2 more times (but plan the dates you do this well in advance, and don't deviate from them, no matter what).

    These days I always ask a democrat to pay a medical bill whenever I get one. None of them ever did it, no matter how much "moral urgency" and "fairness" they thought such acts were graced with. And no, they didn't think that not paying my bill justified anyone calling them rich, selfish stealing capitalists. When I took one democrat's wallet, and took out the money, just like he wants the government to do, he got aggressive. They did not, in fact, thought that not doing so even made them selfish. You should use people's own rulebook against them. Some actually got it.

  229. Find the fall guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find the fall guy, the one person that would go to jail if they get sued. Talk to him/her, say something like "I'm really worried about you, I mean, if something happens, the company will be closed, I'll lose my job, but you... you'll go to JAIL!". You may see his/her face changing,
    becoming more and more worried.

    Make sure he/she hears recent stories of people in the same position as his/her going to jail for similar reasons (tv, radio, internet news, whatever).

    Do not send these stories yourself or you will be seen as the cause of the problem. You have to let other worry about this, so somebody else brings the story to higher levels, takes the risk and also has a real reason to request a change (he/she can go to jail for not doing so).

    Later, you can say "I agree. When he/she first mentioned this in , I went on and changed my programs to avoid using illegal software. All the programs I use now on a daily basis are legal and free. If you want, I can show them to you, and we may see what's missing so we can substitute as many as possible."

  230. I was fired for this by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

    Then you outline a plan to audit the computers on your network and a plan for remediation...

    In 1997, the company I worked for was using copies of software illegally. I pointed this out to my manager and presented a plan to implement a policy of "budget for it or lose it" across the company. He told me no, that a business decision had been made to use the software in spite of it being illegally.

    I told him that as systems administrator, I was genuinely concerned that if we got audited, I would be on the hook for the violations that were taking place, and that I wanted an e-mail or written letter stating the business decision to continue using unlicensed software. I explained that we were one disgruntled employee away from losing everything, and that our churn rate was very high.

    To be honest, my boss was a twit, and I honestly thought that once his boss and upper-level management found out what was going on, that he was putting the company at risk, I would be complimented for a job well done, and he might even be replaced. Of course, that was when I was a bit more naive than I am today, and after following up our meeting with an e-mail about the company's non-compliance and my plan to get everyone legal, I was terminated. In my termination letter, it never mentioned the software explicitly, but it did mention something about a "disregard for business policies." (They were actually really grasping. My termination letter also said that I had taken "unauthorized vacation" when I missed a day of work after an automobile accident to deal with injuries, insurance, and acquiring another means of transportation.)

    In a job interview a year ago, I was asked if I had ever been fired from a job. I honestly answered that yes, I have. I could tell that the interviewer got a little uncomfortable, and I explained the story. I told him that during the whole ordeal, my focus was on looking out for the best interests of the company even above my own short-term interests. I told him that even though they screwed me over and I probably had them dead-to-rights on flagrant licensing violations if I had turned them in, I chose professionalism over revenge and didn't do it. I told him that if I'm hired, I'll look out for his company's interests the same way. I might not always tell him what he wants to hear, but I'll always tell him the truth.

    I guess it was convincing enough because I was hired and I'm still working for that company today. Needless to say, life is much better for me these days, and I've prospered over the years much more than the company that fired me.

    To the submitter, stand firm. DO NOT do anything illegal, or you'll be just as culpable as they will. I know it sounds trite and in this moment and in this economy, it seems like the end of the world to think about getting fired, but in five or ten years from now, if you stand up to your boss today on something that is so clearly immoral that he is asking you to do, I guarantee that you will be better off. Trust me, "Future You" will thank you for it.

  231. No reward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't have a chance to read all 800 something posts on here, but if you have installed any of the software yourself, and the poster has, you CAN'T report them to the BSA, you're not eligible for a reward, and you are in a very bad position. Not to say that he will be the one to take the hit, if he takes everyones recomendations to document his efforts to get the organization compliant i'm sure that will go a long way to vindicating him, but he can lose any and all thoughts of claiming a reward, since he's not eligible for it. Best he could do is have someone else call it in, cover his butt, and split the money. Which is what I would personally do if the president of the company snubbed me like that.

  232. Re:Bide your time ...and GET RICH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had three jobs and am now a multi-millionaire thanks to the BSA. You can find the reporting forms at https://reporting.bsa.org/.

  233. Re:I don't think that means what you think it mean by cromar · · Score: 1

    your position here is not that much different from a criminal gang

    Correct, protection rackets, conspiracy, and murder are quite similar to pirating a few copies of MS Office. How did I miss that?

    Leaving is pretty much the only non-cowardly approach to that, if management won't listen to you. Man up, sir. Such petty games are for weaklings.

  234. My XP Key Is Google-able _AND_ Legit by Golddess · · Score: 1

    Given that I was only able to find one burnt copy of Office Pro with a Google-able CD-Key, and that version of Office is on at least 20 computers, I'm not convinced.

    To be fair, the copies of Windows XP that my university had for sale to students all used the same CD key, and googling for it reveals hundreds of sites with the same key listed. I believe such a thing is said to be "site licensed".

    --
    "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  235. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not necessarily.

    If it's within your purview, you can always try ordering licenses for the software in question, or submitting the purchase request through proper channels. When asked why, explain that you cannot find any licensing information, and you're looking to protect the company's interests.

    That said, it's not your job to make policy, nor is it your responsibility to protect the financial interests of the publishers of the software in question.

    So, keep a record of all of your meetings and document all conversations you had with any superiors regarding the situation. Obviously you don't want to include any especially damning details one way or the other -- your goal here is not retribution, it's job and career security. If you said nothing to management about a problem you knew about, then you're at fault. At the same time, you don't want to take the fall if/when someone reports your company. Keeping records will help to defend against either scenario, and improve your job prospects should you be "let go." It's evidence that you were trying to be a team player. CYA -- Cover Your Ass -- but don't rock the boat unless you're prepared for the consequences when everyone ends up in the water (including yourself).

    this is the most reasonable response in this repugnantly sactimonious thread.

    srsly, who died and made you the morality police?

    there are TONS of things in society that are illegal. I DON'T CARE. and YOU DON'T CARE. srsly, do you REALLY CARE? it's not like they're killing children or puppies on coffee breaks. do you REALLY CARE?

    when your girlfriend goes over the speed limit, do you call 911 to get her ass pulled over or start recording the speedometer with your celphone camera for proof later?

    when your friend gave you a mixed tape in grade school, did you submit it as evidence to the riaa?

    when your friend is smoking pot in countries other than amsterdam, do you call the narcs on his butt?

    if you find out that your friend is playing a cracked game, do you call the fbi?

    some might dodge by saying that as an employee, you are being complicit in the actions of your company but as a friend with knowledge, you are no less complicit in the crimes your friends and neighbors commit.

    unless they pass some kind of law that PROFESSIONALLY REQUIRES an IT employee to report illegal activities (as lawyers and doctors are bound to do), you are as much obligated to report your company as you are to report those around you in your daily life.

    that being the case, the advice stikypad gives seems to be the right one. look out for yourself certainly, keep getting paid, be just as inclined to turn in your boss as you would be to turn in your mom.

    and again, for those who would seek to dodge - we're not talking about murdering kids or puppies. there ARE INDEED things that people really do and should care about. a company that is dumping toxic chemical into a school water supply, secretly conspiring to bilk their customers of their life savings, killing children and puppies. etc.

    but it's NOT ALL THE SAME THING. some things you really do care about. other things, you have to convince yourself that you - for some reason - care about it. so again - do you REALLY CARE?

    finally - it seems that in a society where so much is indeed technically illegal, even things that to the judgment of most reasonable people shouldn't be, shouldn't we take to heart the old chestnut - let he who is without sin cast the first stone?

    NO bootleg albums in your posession? no mix tapes acquired from another? no duplicated VHS tapes from way back? no MAME roms for which you do not own the cabinet game?

    hmmm?

    AC

  236. Offer alternatives that are legit and usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WinZip - 7Zip, GPL.
    Antivirus is tricky, but it's possible to lock down Windows with gpedit.msc, or some regs in case it's a Home version.
    OpenOffice.. yeah i know. -10^2 is still +20, aka MSMath patent pending not to be confused with mathematics, it still auto(dis)corrects s**t even when you tell it not to, but it's an ok suite if you can manage to ignore and overcome those things with some archaic methods. ... basically look for GPL applications or programs that explicitly allow "commercial use".

    1. Re:Offer alternatives that are legit and usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i mean +100 not +20.. it's not that bad!
      going to sleep now, that has to be the problem...

  237. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    submitting the purchase request through proper channels.

    That is probably the best course of action. Do an audit on the installed software and licenses. Submit a report (in writing!) showing that X licenses are MISSING. Don't say they are doing anything illegal, treat it as a simple matter of losing track of the inventory. "Gee Mr. Boss, you're right, we don't use illegal software. But it's the darndest thing, we seem to have misplaced most of our license keys. We'd better track these down or get new ones."

    If the boss comes up and tells you to install something improperly, just say "Well, I'd love to install X application. The only problem is that we don't have a valid license for it, and without that I just can't do it". If you get heat or a direct "just do it anyhow" then simply say "Look, what you're asking me to do is potentially not legal, & I'm not comfortable doing it." If repercussions come along, then go get an attorney.

    But at least initially, don't be an accuser, don't run around crying foul, don't be a "whistleblower", etc. It'll put people on guard against you... and who knows, maybe the boss is just lazy and actually does have those licenses sitting around somewhere.

  238. BSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure it's a fine outfit, but what could the Boy Scouts of America possibly do about software piracy?

  239. Welcome to the club by throw-away-account15 · · Score: 1

    I can sadly relate. The company I work for has *severe* licensing issues.

    What makes it more ironic/depressing/hypocritical is that we are a software development company.

    Based on my position in the company, I report to the IT Manager, who reports directly to the CEO. No matter how much I push, I’ve not been able to get any real change.

    Basically the CEO is tight and doesn’t want to spend money, at all. We have one (legit) MSDN subscription which is used by ~80 developers, in addition to powering all our production servers. Not to mention we’ve got a *ton* of shareware on people’s desktops which is never paid for.

    I talk to my boss (IT Manager) about it who basically shrugs and goes “yeah? What do you want me to do about it?”

    Given that the company is fairly laid back, I actually went direct to the CEO – he’s well aware of the problem, but his excuse is that “We’re a software development company, when we make a sale, Microsoft makes a sale” (eg. Our software will only work on a Windows system, so we’re apparently making Microsoft money by writing our software targeted at a Microsoft platform)

    I’ve brought up the issues about the rewards for people to turn them in, and the general manager of the company basically said to me “Look, I know what we’re doing is wrong, and I know we’re going to be found out eventually, it’s just a matter of time – our plan is just to plead for mercy when Microsoft finally does come knocking”.

    For me personally, the best I can do is to distance myself from the topic as best I can. I’ve ensured that my concerns have been heard, and are actually in writing, if the time ever comes that I may need to rely on.

    I’ve made (very small) changes, I’ve stopped installing evaluation versions of WinZip/WinRAR and replaced it with 7-Zip, I’ve stopped installing TextPad on developer’s machines and replaced it with Notepad ++.

    Other than that, all I can do is cringe when a staff member comes up to the IT department and says “Hey, I need installed on my PC, do we have a license for that?” and my boss says “Yeah, sure, no worries, we’ll have it installed by tomorrow”

    (and sorry BSA et al. I am paranoid, so posting this from a newly-created throw-away account via Tor)

  240. Report them- if they don't switch to open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless the pay is amazing, you can't find another job, can't afford to loose your job, etc. let them know you don't intend to assist in pirating software; which includes supporting or installing it. Then inform them that there are good alternative solutions that they can move to that won't cost them a dime and all-but-eliminates the risks the company is currently taking violating software license agreements. I would probably point out that the BSA will eventually come down hard on the company- even if it hasn't happened yet. Plenty of open source software exists for things like archiving and compressing data. Be it on MS Windows or GNU/Linux. I would immediately seek out another job too before presenting these arguments. If they are stupid enough to fire you over it you can always report them.

  241. Pssh by tengeta · · Score: 1

    They are the ones financially and legally responsible, just cite precedence about how the FBI kills people under "military orders" when they clearly know what they shot at was civilian. Oh yeah, thats just murder. You fuckin violated some copyrights son, you screwed.

    --
    "They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!"
  242. this could be evidence of Ethics Violations by Veretax · · Score: 1

    This could be evidence of Ethics Violations, and if you work for a company with an Ethics Hotline, or if you work for the Government or Department of Defense, it may be your duty to report this problem if it is not taken care of in a timely fashion. They take this sort of thing pretty seriously, and if I recall correctly, they recently passed some rules about just this sort of thing.

  243. Re:Get Out. Sleep Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've run into this before. I've always felt that your best bet is to just document everything. I've made a habit of following up verbal conversations with higher-ups with an email that basically says "I just want to make sure I'm clear on our conversation earlier today. I told you we have lots of pirated software and offered to work with purchasing to get us legal, and you said 'No'. Right?"
    Keep that email archived somewhere and if the BSA ever comes knocking, you can prove you did your best but were shut down by the boss.

  244. Helpful Information. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.spa.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=173&Itemid=233

  245. Document by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Document your observations and the notice you gave to management, then go about your job and don't worry about it.

    If you have a moral issue with piracy then also look for another job, but don't expect it to be much better at the new place.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  246. no options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its ethics vs survival

  247. anon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no one will likely read this, and i wont be able to reply even if they do, given the flood of comments, but if anyone can benefit from this info...

    the two places i worked at that i helped begin using opensource software got some much shit from their employees every time something went wrong with the individual's computer because, well, it must be the free software that fucked their computer up right? even some of the managers had trouble understanding that free software is sometimes way better and more stable than the other shit. i cant tell you how many times i had to listen to everyone bitch about this thing; the level of ignorance was amazing. after some time, i stopped trying to help them understand the situation and the software because they weren't interested.

  248. Get out, now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A dishonest CEO will screw his employees (and his customers) over in a heartbeat. If he's being dishonest about software piracy, you can be confidant that he's just as dishonest in other areas, too (accounting, payroll, regulatory compliance, etc). You can't trust a crook.

    Consider it a blessing that he's revealed his true colors. Polish your resume and get out ASAP.

  249. compliance migration plan by BusyByte · · Score: 1

    I suggest you anonymously tip off your compliance department if you have one. If you don't have one then suggest that it will work in the short term but come up with a plan to come into compliance or a real alternative which meets your budget and requirements. If all else fails then look do what you're told or look for another job. Keep some documentation in case they come looking for somebody that you were told to do that even when you objected. When you change jobs, if you want to burn bridges then report them to the software authors.

  250. you're doomed by shentino · · Score: 1

    So you've already complained to the president and gotten shot down?

    Any PHB with that kind of an attitude probably doesn't give two shits about ethics...and worse yet, by opening your trap you probably set off a few alarms and got a target on your back.

    Get into CYA mode right now and document everything.

    Oh, and start looking for a new job. The higher ups are probably already scheming of a way to get rid of you before you cause any more trouble...part of which would come up with a plausible enough of a bullshit excuse to make sure their hands are clean.

    Your next conversation should be with your lawyer. Particularly since by your own awareness of copyright infringement you could potentially be considered an accessory.

  251. Irony by angelbunny · · Score: 1

    So if a company 'cheats' the system, as in they do not pay for a license then they do not legally have to accept an audit without a court order. However, if a company is legitimate and buys a proper license then they have to legally accept an audit?

    Sounds like the safe solution is to cheat the system.

  252. Shopping Tip for Non Profits by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

    They did agree to take it slow and get legit over a period of time. During that period, I did install Office on more machines but they bought the licenses over a period of 18 months. In the end, I am happy to say we are nearly 100% compliant.

    For non-profits looking to acquire licenses to get compliant take a look at sites like TechSoup.org. Lots of Microsoft and Adobe software, as well as others at greatly reduced prices ($16 bucks per license for Office 2007). For MS stuff, you can acquire up to 50 licenses for up to 6 titles every two years (with product assurance, if that matters to you).

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  253. Which? by h00manist · · Score: 1

    The free software, or the free informaion about pirated software, or the free money the BSA offers for denouncing software piracy?

    --
    Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
  254. A humanist position - by h00manist · · Score: 1

    A humanist position would be that which most benefits humanity and human beings. Corporations are not human beings. Money, profit margins, products, economic principles, social systems, concepts, traditions and laws are not human beings. Opposing violence and ignorance in all forms is at the core of humanist proposals. The free flow of information, ideas, and communication benefits humanity. Copying information qualifies as communication, the flow of ideas. So "copyright" and "copy-no-rights" and patent law is censorship, simply. Which is clearly demonstrated by the raids, prosecutions, arrests, spying, censorship, etc on anyone who openly disobeys the copyright law. Yes, the economic systems create diffculties, too.

    --
    Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/