Imagine the type of skilled labor you could obtain over 200 years... More and more people will become highly (and i mean highly) trained specialists in whatever they do. This would allow for ever-increasing advanced in science, medecine, and technology which would appear to "boom" in the first century of this kind of "immortality".
I know many programmers, that are not able to learn any new programming language or programming paradigm, but are still stuck with cobol or fortran. Many people don't want to learn new things.
Imagine a 200 year old cobol programmer. And don't expect a "boom".
Come on, why should 2.6 be 50% faster than 2.4?
Maybe SCO will sue us 50% faster because of the stolen codelines in 2.6, e.g. for (i=0;in;i++)?
But give me an benchmark to show the 50% performance improvement.
Biotech computers are faster and smaller than silicon based technologies. Dirty keyboards are just the first step to the new age of computing. If the theory of evolution is correct, the bacteria in my keyboard should mutate and merge with the digital parts of my workstation.
Slashdot Mirror
Wine runs Buhl Tax.
He sold his sole to Bill Gates And he don't feel alright, cos the money was shite
I know many programmers, that are not able to learn any new programming language or programming paradigm, but are still stuck with cobol or fortran. Many people don't want to learn new things.
Imagine a 200 year old cobol programmer. And don't expect a "boom".
Every game worth playing will be emulated.
SCO=FUD
Come on, why should 2.6 be 50% faster than 2.4? Maybe SCO will sue us 50% faster because of the stolen codelines in 2.6, e.g. for (i=0;in;i++)? But give me an benchmark to show the 50% performance improvement.
Biotech computers are faster and smaller than silicon based technologies. Dirty keyboards are just the first step to the new age of computing. If the theory of evolution is correct, the bacteria in my keyboard should mutate and merge with the digital parts of my workstation.