2.even versions are (supposed to be) stable. that means that mostly security/bug fixes go in. but occationally, new features that are developed and stabilized in the newer versions are "backported" to older kernels.
If I have a sig, replace it with this blip of text that I manually typed in instead because I don't remember what the sig says (if it exists) and it may not be representative of my current beliefs.
Re:Recycle Bins - don't you just hate them?
on
Undelete In Linux
·
· Score: 1
The DE's already have trashcans. At least Nautilus2 does for sure (it's the only one I use). In windows, if you delete a file from the command line, it's gone forever, if I'm not mistaken. Same thing in linux. If you use the explorer like thing, you get recycle bin; if you use command line, you get gone. I don't see why this (libtrash) is revalent. (Note: I didn't read about what libtrash does. I just made assumptions based on the name.)
2.even versions are (supposed to be) stable. that means that mostly security/bug fixes go in. but occationally, new features that are developed and stabilized in the newer versions are "backported" to older kernels.
- llordsmiff -
Change the proxy in Internet Exploder to "127.0.0.1". Keeps lots of spyware (any Exploder based spyware) from accessing the net.
orgy. My $0.02.
If I have a sig, replace it with this blip of text that I manually typed in instead because I don't remember what the sig says (if it exists) and it may not be representative of my current beliefs.
The DE's already have trashcans. At least Nautilus2 does for sure (it's the only one I use). In windows, if you delete a file from the command line, it's gone forever, if I'm not mistaken. Same thing in linux. If you use the explorer like thing, you get recycle bin; if you use command line, you get gone. I don't see why this (libtrash) is revalent. (Note: I didn't read about what libtrash does. I just made assumptions based on the name.)
- me -