Exactly. It is stories like this that make me wonder why I even read/. anymore... The title fails the test. The summary fails the test HARD. I admit I didn't RTFA because... are you kidding me?
I don't know why I'd bother with digging deeper but just because: 1) A modern QA engineer's job largely centers around automating as much testing as possible. The more automation you do the better you are at your job (so long as the quality stays high) 2) That being said I've never worked at *any company that could survive on a *fixed set of automation for so long as 6 years. Features change and the automation has to change with it. If this story is even remotely true it would have to be: "Spent 6 months automating all testing; Didn't update the automation for 6 years and by miracle the tests continued to pass and no new features failed in prod (or if they did it was blamed elsewhere); at the 6 year point someone figured out this was happening (aka something broke in Prod HARD and they decided to evaluate the testing)." 3) I could see being obsolete not having written any code in 6 years but forgot it all? rubbish. He learned how to script an automation tool and that knowledge got deprecated. Everything else he didn't have experience doing in the first place which just got worse the longer he continued to not work in the business doing actual work. Bummer.
Dark nightclub with presumably loud music going on. Vast majority of the patrons imbibing whatever they so choose to be imbibing. First burst of gunfire rings out and your supposed hero immediately jumps to action with his hip piece and shoots down the guy with the AR. Great. Now patron B coming out of the bathroom doesn't see guy with the AR who's now on the ground BUT he does see random, non-uniformed, gentlemen with a gun drawn and similarly steps to save the day by shooting this clearly dangerous person. This chain reaction can easily involve way more people and way more guns than that simple scenario not to mention the probability that any one or many of these shots aren't fatal in which case you have injured people on both sides of the action trying to make their last stand to the best of their ability. Everyone is well-intentioned I'm sure but the friendly fire takes its toll. That story doesn't even need the alcohol (or whatever else has been consumed that night) to be present. That could happen with "clear" heads.
Note: I'm am not anti-guns in the slightest. Guns may make it easier for such an asshat to take out as many people as he did but at this point in our history, in this country alone, there are enough firearms out there that if he wanted one there'd be someone willing to sell it to him. My problem is people like you that seriously think a shootout by numerous armed unknown shooters in a dark and drunken environment could ever end as cleanly as what you describe above. I think gun reform (or not) could be a way more sensible discussion if people would stop making such ludicrous claims.
I'm also all for Firefox not being a bloated steaming pile that crashes constantly. It is, by far, the worst performing browser I use on the daily and that's *including IE11 which should say a lot. I seem to have seen the performance go completely away when I switched to the 64bit port so maybe my experience is specific to Windows x64 but honestly that's not a good excuse since that's no longer a unicorn environment. Both Chrome and IE have plenty of their own problems but Chrome hasn't crashed on me in years. IE has maybe crashed on me a handful of times in the same time. Firefox crashes on me at least daily if not more often when it's in a mood. Firefox's single process is using the same amount of memory as my Chrome's 26 processes combined which has 44 tabs open vs. 17 in FireFox. Firefox also has only very recently been surpassed by a couple of my IE processes as the king of page faults. All of the above number in the 100s of millions for a browser that crashes daily so has only been up for less than 24 hours.
If it weren't for the fact FireFox renders some very important (to me) websites better than Chrome or IE and that I require the severe sandboxing I get from having 3 completely separate browsers running or FF wouldn't even be on my host. I've got my fingers crossed that these process changes will make using this browser much less painful.
...and to play devil's advocate a bit: It's WAY better especially if you're sitting on a version > 7 as those middle releases had issues. I'm not sure about all the complaints about MS getting ad revenue from me as I haven't seen a single ad in Windows 10 and in every other way it's been a better OS. If you've chosen to run Windows at all, 10 is the most stable and performant place for you to be.
If you don't want to go there then switch to Linux / etc.
Honestly, in a humanitarian universe (pretty sure we're not there), this would end up eventually in a Star Trek like place. You don't work to survive.. food comes out of the replicator, transportation is cheap or free, the cost of "living" becomes virtually nil. You leave the current philosophy where everyone needs to "work". Yes you will have plenty of people who are perfectly fine living off of just this ("drain" on society) but those who wish to do more than survive accomplish great things of their own accord. Of course the Star Trek universe included an absolutely massive military industrial complex which keeps a LOT of people "productively employed" instead of sitting on their arses but the concept is a valid one.
The result of prolific automation should remove the need for the minimum wage worker to actually work for their sustenance living. The remaining need for "human" workers could be low enough that such remaining jobs be *very highly compensated to justify working or maybe some short term of required "service" (back to military / star fleet) where you put in your 5-10 years of labor and get to enjoy society's benefits after that.
Not saying we live in a universe where such a thing could come to pass but I wish we did.
I'm guessing some editor told them they needed to include the presumed female engineer shortage to make this article POP but the writer failed to do so gracefully.
That being said I spend a lot of time in a world where a vast number of my friends have access to and use a vast cornucopia of adulterants and many of the hardest hitters are nurses (who aren't all but are largely female in this sample). Probably something to do with "I hand out drugs all day so I know what they do and what I want them to do to me" or maybe "My job is so stressful all day long I *really need to get eff'd up at night" whichever the back story that ends up with the worst abusers leaning female in the stats. Regardless of usage can't speak to how good any of them are at "passing" a UA but if more of them are using I'm presuming the stats for messing up being similar. Most of the tests they are failing are for probation, not employment, and those tests are stricter anyway and test for a LOT more things.
FYI: For those who don't know: Full barrage drug tests are expensive. There are very few to no employers who are willing to pay for high precision for every known drug. IMHO if you can't pass an employment screen you weren't trying hard enough (reason enough not to get the job)... it's not that hard to pass one. Failing a government (clearance or criminal) test is a lot harder since they test for more at higher accuracy but still pretty doable. *All that being said, I've been able to say for a very long time (every since I had to take 3 screens to sell computers at Best Buy 22 years ago) that any job that needs me to pee isn't the job for me! I respect an employer who can recognize the work ethic and the talent without resorting to a test that really tells them nothing about my ability to do the job.
That being said: When Google Glass did this it was considered enough of a violation that they banned that and such apps from the device. Social acceptability has to come a long ways here (USA) for this to catch on and certainly before it "brings and end" (fuck you click-bait title) to anything.
No. Net neutrality says that they can't preferentially (or negatively) adjust your packets performance based on who you are BUT says nothing about agreements where the total amount of usage is capped. Quantity vs. Quality.
Company gives you something that costs them very little to encourage you to pay them more money per month... film at 11!
SO this guy's an idiot. He may have exposed an issue with the avoidance (can't presume bumpers / etc at 'normal' height as proven by the jacked up pickup I went "under" with my WRX 10 years ago!) BUT he parked illegally so even if the bug isn't his fault his liability is not clean. Tesla has tons of money so it'll be interesting to see how they respond. ("The driver was clearly at fault given his illegal parking and our logs BUT we decided to augment our cars just because we want them to be even safer!" vs. "We have more money and lawyers so your illegally parking ass isn't winning... bitch.")
"by the number of people using it, developing it, and now using it"...I was using it before BUT now, after developing it, I'm *really using it now...:)
You don't have to have Enterprise: http://www.forbes.com/sites/go......you are slightly more screwed if you have the "Home" edition tho....and for the mod who marked my original post "Redundant":-P
Bullshit Conclusion but not for why you are saying:
Their conclusion basically states that you are not actually making the choice because your brain had an answer before you "thought" about it.
1) My brain is (at least a part of) "me" so if my brain is churning out answers before I consciously "think" about it it is still "me" making the decision.
2) The brain is a massively complex neural network computing device that is constantly taking in information and processing it. It makes perfect sense that "decisions" have been made based on the processing of all of this data so when you are called upon to make a decision you are essentially pulling from cache instead of generating a new "decision".
3) The conclusion I would draw from this is that humans are more likely to not trust their instinct when given the opportunity to "re-process". "Instinct" here defined as the well processed conclusions your subconscious brain has already delivered on. Free will being your conscious' ability to not utilize that information and decide against "instinct".
They seem to be implying that some external to "you" force is feeding you the future but in this case we're really talking about the ongoing battle between the conscious you and the subconscious you which are both still "you".
1) This user was updating TO Windows 10 not Updating Windows 10. That means they were using Windows (presumably 7) Update which is highly and easily configurable.
2) It's not as easy to customize Windows 10 Update once you are in there BUT it is still possible. Required a group perms change to expose the settings but they are there just "discouraged"
3) Even without the gredit fix you can tell Windows 10 not to update automatically and/or customize the time if it does.
Google is your friend... ask it a question it'll give you an answer.
I've generally liked Chrome and have been using it pretty much since it dropped. That being said I use all 3 major browsers and lately have been experiencing more and more sites that just don't work properly in that browser. Given these could all be situations where a particular site is doing something non-standard and Chrome is just dealing with it appropriately but when massive major site after massive major site don't work quite right there I'm guessing the fault lie more on Google than the web devs. I'm also still fairly peeved that the mobile version of the browser is still so heavy weight. Chrome on Android is a resource hog. You would think they could be better citizens on their own OS..
Your math is disregarding a few details: Just to be complete: Already mentioned: 1) Highest enforced ratio is 0.6. I've been on sites that go to the full 1.0 so this is somewhat friendly. 2) They have periodic Free Leech times (thanks for being a member this weekend, sorry for the downtime, etc) and items (editors/admin picks, Bowie catalog when he died, etc) which allow you to build up some buffer in your ratio.
Not already mentioned: 1) The biggest way to improve your ratio on any site is to upload material not already on the tracker. Every bit of upstream on those is pure plus for your ratio and until the swarm gets big enough you will tend to be the source for a lot of the download traffic so you get BIG multipliers. (20-30x makes up for a lot of under-performing torrents.) 2) It is kind of a ponzi scheme that at some point the leaves will tend to have difficulty attaining a 1.0 ratio on any given torrent and given What's somewhat exclusive membership size it *can be very difficult to gain positive ratio. That being said, this is a ponzi where anyone in the network can be at the top or bottom for any given Torrent SO maybe you were a leaf on some obscure album you just had to have but you happened to jump on early and be a root for an extremely popular release so you got 5x on that one. You might have a lot of torrents that never quite reach 1.0 but your overall ratio can easily be above 1.0.
Torrents only work well when people stay on to seed instead of hit-and-run style. Rules like this keep the swarms healthy. Note: this is not the only rule for this.. many sites also have specific restrictions for time period which actually ease the ratio rules a bit. "Sorry you were a leaf on this torrent but we're going to make you stay seeding for at least 2 weeks to keep the torrent alive. you don't get the ratio but you at least tried" Stuff.
PS. I have difficulty feeling any sympathy for an industry that shipped 1/3 Billion units last year. I'm sorry you can't sustain growth indefinitely but you're selling plenty of product to make lots and lots of money. Fuck off.
Since what I'm replying to is Anonymous and ergo 0 scored I'll give 'er a bump:
They are not saying: "If you're disabled you no longer need to prove it!"
They ARE saying: "Hey we already know you're disabled and have a school loan so we're going to be nice for a change and ease the process of getting you off of our ledger."
This is a specific bulk cleanup operation for existing people in this situation not a change of ongoing policy.
You can now return to not caring about the details and arguing...
Article clearly written by someone who doesn't understand what a "recall" is. These happen all the time to nearly if not every vehicle. Given how much these cars cost, I'm pretty sure Elon can afford the maybe couple million this recall will cost tops (and that's retail cost of the part... you *know they're not actually spending retail cost on the replacement parts and the labor is virtually nil to replace a seat)
Spin being what it is this article could have easily been written to the headline "Tesla continues to ensure delivered vehicles are top-notch!" with similar content to the summary including that they are voluntarily recalling 2700 vehicle despite no known failures in the wild. Spending low 7 figures so they their customers can know they are safe to the best of Tesla's ability.
Instead they are casting this in a negative light and spreading fear. I have no need to blow sunshine up Elon's ass but I really can't stand journalists who's only talent is playing off of people's fears.
Insert BOLD claim here to get attention because I'm lonely.
DevOps, as we know it, is dead. Perhaps not many people agree with me
Should have stopped right there.. because the next sentence fragment should be "because I'm a raving lunatic who doesn't understand the words coming out of my mouth"
Slashdot Mirror
Exactly. It is stories like this that make me wonder why I even read /. anymore... The title fails the test. The summary fails the test HARD. I admit I didn't RTFA because... are you kidding me?
I don't know why I'd bother with digging deeper but just because:
1) A modern QA engineer's job largely centers around automating as much testing as possible. The more automation you do the better you are at your job (so long as the quality stays high)
2) That being said I've never worked at *any company that could survive on a *fixed set of automation for so long as 6 years. Features change and the automation has to change with it. If this story is even remotely true it would have to be: "Spent 6 months automating all testing; Didn't update the automation for 6 years and by miracle the tests continued to pass and no new features failed in prod (or if they did it was blamed elsewhere); at the 6 year point someone figured out this was happening (aka something broke in Prod HARD and they decided to evaluate the testing)."
3) I could see being obsolete not having written any code in 6 years but forgot it all? rubbish. He learned how to script an automation tool and that knowledge got deprecated. Everything else he didn't have experience doing in the first place which just got worse the longer he continued to not work in the business doing actual work. Bummer.
The sky must be gorgeous in your universe...
Dark nightclub with presumably loud music going on. Vast majority of the patrons imbibing whatever they so choose to be imbibing. First burst of gunfire rings out and your supposed hero immediately jumps to action with his hip piece and shoots down the guy with the AR. Great. Now patron B coming out of the bathroom doesn't see guy with the AR who's now on the ground BUT he does see random, non-uniformed, gentlemen with a gun drawn and similarly steps to save the day by shooting this clearly dangerous person. This chain reaction can easily involve way more people and way more guns than that simple scenario not to mention the probability that any one or many of these shots aren't fatal in which case you have injured people on both sides of the action trying to make their last stand to the best of their ability. Everyone is well-intentioned I'm sure but the friendly fire takes its toll. That story doesn't even need the alcohol (or whatever else has been consumed that night) to be present. That could happen with "clear" heads.
Note: I'm am not anti-guns in the slightest. Guns may make it easier for such an asshat to take out as many people as he did but at this point in our history, in this country alone, there are enough firearms out there that if he wanted one there'd be someone willing to sell it to him. My problem is people like you that seriously think a shootout by numerous armed unknown shooters in a dark and drunken environment could ever end as cleanly as what you describe above. I think gun reform (or not) could be a way more sensible discussion if people would stop making such ludicrous claims.
I'm all for the security benefit of this.
I'm also all for Firefox not being a bloated steaming pile that crashes constantly. It is, by far, the worst performing browser I use on the daily and that's *including IE11 which should say a lot. I seem to have seen the performance go completely away when I switched to the 64bit port so maybe my experience is specific to Windows x64 but honestly that's not a good excuse since that's no longer a unicorn environment. Both Chrome and IE have plenty of their own problems but Chrome hasn't crashed on me in years. IE has maybe crashed on me a handful of times in the same time. Firefox crashes on me at least daily if not more often when it's in a mood. Firefox's single process is using the same amount of memory as my Chrome's 26 processes combined which has 44 tabs open vs. 17 in FireFox. Firefox also has only very recently been surpassed by a couple of my IE processes as the king of page faults. All of the above number in the 100s of millions for a browser that crashes daily so has only been up for less than 24 hours.
If it weren't for the fact FireFox renders some very important (to me) websites better than Chrome or IE and that I require the severe sandboxing I get from having 3 completely separate browsers running or FF wouldn't even be on my host. I've got my fingers crossed that these process changes will make using this browser much less painful.
...and then posted his name to /. ... DOH! ;)
...and to play devil's advocate a bit: It's WAY better especially if you're sitting on a version > 7 as those middle releases had issues. I'm not sure about all the complaints about MS getting ad revenue from me as I haven't seen a single ad in Windows 10 and in every other way it's been a better OS. If you've chosen to run Windows at all, 10 is the most stable and performant place for you to be.
If you don't want to go there then switch to Linux / etc.
Honestly, in a humanitarian universe (pretty sure we're not there), this would end up eventually in a Star Trek like place. You don't work to survive.. food comes out of the replicator, transportation is cheap or free, the cost of "living" becomes virtually nil. You leave the current philosophy where everyone needs to "work". Yes you will have plenty of people who are perfectly fine living off of just this ("drain" on society) but those who wish to do more than survive accomplish great things of their own accord. Of course the Star Trek universe included an absolutely massive military industrial complex which keeps a LOT of people "productively employed" instead of sitting on their arses but the concept is a valid one.
The result of prolific automation should remove the need for the minimum wage worker to actually work for their sustenance living. The remaining need for "human" workers could be low enough that such remaining jobs be *very highly compensated to justify working or maybe some short term of required "service" (back to military / star fleet) where you put in your 5-10 years of labor and get to enjoy society's benefits after that.
Not saying we live in a universe where such a thing could come to pass but I wish we did.
Especially if this adhesive coating is applied to the windshield too...
The trauma from the kid sitting in their car staring at the lifeless *detached face of the person they just killed would make for a fantastic movie.
I'm guessing some editor told them they needed to include the presumed female engineer shortage to make this article POP but the writer failed to do so gracefully.
That being said I spend a lot of time in a world where a vast number of my friends have access to and use a vast cornucopia of adulterants and many of the hardest hitters are nurses (who aren't all but are largely female in this sample). Probably something to do with "I hand out drugs all day so I know what they do and what I want them to do to me" or maybe "My job is so stressful all day long I *really need to get eff'd up at night" whichever the back story that ends up with the worst abusers leaning female in the stats. Regardless of usage can't speak to how good any of them are at "passing" a UA but if more of them are using I'm presuming the stats for messing up being similar. Most of the tests they are failing are for probation, not employment, and those tests are stricter anyway and test for a LOT more things.
FYI: For those who don't know: Full barrage drug tests are expensive. There are very few to no employers who are willing to pay for high precision for every known drug. IMHO if you can't pass an employment screen you weren't trying hard enough (reason enough not to get the job)... it's not that hard to pass one. Failing a government (clearance or criminal) test is a lot harder since they test for more at higher accuracy but still pretty doable. *All that being said, I've been able to say for a very long time (every since I had to take 3 screens to sell computers at Best Buy 22 years ago) that any job that needs me to pee isn't the job for me! I respect an employer who can recognize the work ethic and the talent without resorting to a test that really tells them nothing about my ability to do the job.
I did once write Hello World in the snow... :)
Public anonymity went away a long time ago...
That being said: When Google Glass did this it was considered enough of a violation that they banned that and such apps from the device. Social acceptability has to come a long ways here (USA) for this to catch on and certainly before it "brings and end" (fuck you click-bait title) to anything.
No. Net neutrality says that they can't preferentially (or negatively) adjust your packets performance based on who you are BUT says nothing about agreements where the total amount of usage is capped. Quantity vs. Quality.
Company gives you something that costs them very little to encourage you to pay them more money per month... film at 11!
SO this guy's an idiot. He may have exposed an issue with the avoidance (can't presume bumpers / etc at 'normal' height as proven by the jacked up pickup I went "under" with my WRX 10 years ago!) BUT he parked illegally so even if the bug isn't his fault his liability is not clean. Tesla has tons of money so it'll be interesting to see how they respond. ("The driver was clearly at fault given his illegal parking and our logs BUT we decided to augment our cars just because we want them to be even safer!" vs. "We have more money and lawyers so your illegally parking ass isn't winning... bitch.")
"by the number of people using it, developing it, and now using it" ...I was using it before BUT now, after developing it, I'm *really using it now... :)
Exactly why I continue to boycott Apple's products. Their view of the world has not meshed with mine since Woz left the company.
You don't have to have Enterprise: ...you are slightly more screwed if you have the "Home" edition tho. ...and for the mod who marked my original post "Redundant" :-P
http://www.forbes.com/sites/go...
Bullshit Conclusion but not for why you are saying:
Their conclusion basically states that you are not actually making the choice because your brain had an answer before you "thought" about it.
1) My brain is (at least a part of) "me" so if my brain is churning out answers before I consciously "think" about it it is still "me" making the decision.
2) The brain is a massively complex neural network computing device that is constantly taking in information and processing it. It makes perfect sense that "decisions" have been made based on the processing of all of this data so when you are called upon to make a decision you are essentially pulling from cache instead of generating a new "decision".
3) The conclusion I would draw from this is that humans are more likely to not trust their instinct when given the opportunity to "re-process". "Instinct" here defined as the well processed conclusions your subconscious brain has already delivered on. Free will being your conscious' ability to not utilize that information and decide against "instinct".
They seem to be implying that some external to "you" force is feeding you the future but in this case we're really talking about the ongoing battle between the conscious you and the subconscious you which are both still "you".
No. No. and No.
1) This user was updating TO Windows 10 not Updating Windows 10. That means they were using Windows (presumably 7) Update which is highly and easily configurable.
2) It's not as easy to customize Windows 10 Update once you are in there BUT it is still possible. Required a group perms change to expose the settings but they are there just "discouraged"
3) Even without the gredit fix you can tell Windows 10 not to update automatically and/or customize the time if it does.
Google is your friend... ask it a question it'll give you an answer.
I've generally liked Chrome and have been using it pretty much since it dropped. That being said I use all 3 major browsers and lately have been experiencing more and more sites that just don't work properly in that browser. Given these could all be situations where a particular site is doing something non-standard and Chrome is just dealing with it appropriately but when massive major site after massive major site don't work quite right there I'm guessing the fault lie more on Google than the web devs. I'm also still fairly peeved that the mobile version of the browser is still so heavy weight. Chrome on Android is a resource hog. You would think they could be better citizens on their own OS..
Your math is disregarding a few details:
Just to be complete: Already mentioned:
1) Highest enforced ratio is 0.6. I've been on sites that go to the full 1.0 so this is somewhat friendly.
2) They have periodic Free Leech times (thanks for being a member this weekend, sorry for the downtime, etc) and items (editors/admin picks, Bowie catalog when he died, etc) which allow you to build up some buffer in your ratio.
Not already mentioned:
1) The biggest way to improve your ratio on any site is to upload material not already on the tracker. Every bit of upstream on those is pure plus for your ratio and until the swarm gets big enough you will tend to be the source for a lot of the download traffic so you get BIG multipliers. (20-30x makes up for a lot of under-performing torrents.)
2) It is kind of a ponzi scheme that at some point the leaves will tend to have difficulty attaining a 1.0 ratio on any given torrent and given What's somewhat exclusive membership size it *can be very difficult to gain positive ratio. That being said, this is a ponzi where anyone in the network can be at the top or bottom for any given Torrent SO maybe you were a leaf on some obscure album you just had to have but you happened to jump on early and be a root for an extremely popular release so you got 5x on that one. You might have a lot of torrents that never quite reach 1.0 but your overall ratio can easily be above 1.0.
Torrents only work well when people stay on to seed instead of hit-and-run style. Rules like this keep the swarms healthy. Note: this is not the only rule for this.. many sites also have specific restrictions for time period which actually ease the ratio rules a bit. "Sorry you were a leaf on this torrent but we're going to make you stay seeding for at least 2 weeks to keep the torrent alive. you don't get the ratio but you at least tried" Stuff.
PS. I have difficulty feeling any sympathy for an industry that shipped 1/3 Billion units last year. I'm sorry you can't sustain growth indefinitely but you're selling plenty of product to make lots and lots of money. Fuck off.
I'd feel the same way... except for, as with nearly every phone I've owned, the headphone jack no longer functions well!
Motorola: This isn't that hard a concept! *Reinforce the damn jack.
Otherwise I'm looking forward to an unlocked Gen2 Moto-X. My Gen1 is not quite so snappy in its old age and I want the better camera and storage too.
"Drop your weapon... YOU HAVE 10 SECONDS TO COMPLY!!!"
https://a1-images.myspacecdn.c...
Since what I'm replying to is Anonymous and ergo 0 scored I'll give 'er a bump:
They are not saying: "If you're disabled you no longer need to prove it!"
They ARE saying: "Hey we already know you're disabled and have a school loan so we're going to be nice for a change and ease the process of getting you off of our ledger."
This is a specific bulk cleanup operation for existing people in this situation not a change of ongoing policy.
You can now return to not caring about the details and arguing...
Article clearly written by someone who doesn't understand what a "recall" is. These happen all the time to nearly if not every vehicle. Given how much these cars cost, I'm pretty sure Elon can afford the maybe couple million this recall will cost tops (and that's retail cost of the part... you *know they're not actually spending retail cost on the replacement parts and the labor is virtually nil to replace a seat)
Spin being what it is this article could have easily been written to the headline "Tesla continues to ensure delivered vehicles are top-notch!" with similar content to the summary including that they are voluntarily recalling 2700 vehicle despite no known failures in the wild. Spending low 7 figures so they their customers can know they are safe to the best of Tesla's ability.
Instead they are casting this in a negative light and spreading fear. I have no need to blow sunshine up Elon's ass but I really can't stand journalists who's only talent is playing off of people's fears.
Insert BOLD claim here to get attention because I'm lonely.
DevOps, as we know it, is dead. Perhaps not many people agree with me
Should have stopped right there.. because the next sentence fragment should be "because I'm a raving lunatic who doesn't understand the words coming out of my mouth"