heat come from anywhere is heat, period. whether heat come from one GPU or a beowulf cluster GPU, as long as effective heatsinking is done it probably is not related to the question on how much heat it would generate.
I would say you are probably right on that it would be less than one raedon x1900xt though..//posting on nvidia based on board display that cost just some $80 for the motherboard...
i know i shouldn't reply on the signatures of other people, but really, some people do read playboy for the articles... if people wanted to see all those models, i believe internet would be the cheaper way to go...
no need to talk about RISC/CISC stuff here. one word is enough to describe the speed of OSX under G3/G4 <1000MHz -- SLOW.
i've been using mac's from '89 (on a lowly black-and-white powerbook) till now (with the iMac FP) and macos X is simply slow on iMac FP (which is running G4 800MHz). I've seen OSX running in G5 and core duo and it's good. but on anything slower than iMac FP (G4 800) i don't think it's reasonable speed. btw my imac fp is running os9...
i for one do not think that economics is a non-issue here. it's definitely important. if there's no money to aid research then it's almost impossible to get drugs done.
people who have $100000 to spend with colon cancer = a lot people whose MRSA infection can't be cured with vancomycin = very limited
i don't think it's seen in the wild, but there's quite a bit of patients died of VRSA already. check http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=p ubmed&term=VRSA
1. Probably not so much for glial cell tumors though.
2. that's right that microwaves, given enough strength can cause genetic damage, but probably not at these dose as people like most of us are receiving from the antenna upstairs
1. microwave signal is not at the 10Hz range. Brain cell do work at that sort of range if you do an EEG but that's totally unrelated. Blood-brain barrier is not made of pores that can dilate unless you cook the pores literally.
2. it's relatively simple to see sun emits more radiation (regardless of the frequency). You don't have to double check, you just have to see whether your skin/hair heat up.
yes, but that the decrease in excess could be the effect due to the need of genetic predisposition (i.e. by the time it decreases, most who are genetically predisposed get the disease, others don't.)
Of course the hypothesis above is dangerous, i knew it, but it is yet another possibility one has to consider in these situations.
I'm sorry, but in cities like Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore etc, there are thousands of buildings with GSM towers installed, believe it or not.
I don't see how wikipedia is related to my reply, mind to explain a little bit further? as for the last sentence i think anybody who are studying in the field of law would have learnt it already.
just to remind you, there are hundreds of thousands of towers in the world that has those sort of antenna installed. the chance of a clustered cancer related to RF antenna-related to ONLY OCCUR in one single site is, eh, minimal.
btw it was 'prima facie', not 'prima facia', as the original word is from 'facies', and is to be differentiated from 'res ipsa loquitur'.
I'm sorry, but even *radioactivity* does take some time to work, especially when it is not high enough in terms of power, as in the power of those used in total body irradiation with stem cell rescue...
note that you are always allowed to use another [more] reliable database here. they set the price, you bought it, that's economics AFAIK.
to give them a fair comment, i would say that i believe they have been doing a good job for quite a while and the security problems are not as problematic as it seems to many of the readers here.
Slashdot Mirror
i immediately think of starcraft, by the way :)
heat come from anywhere is heat, period. whether heat come from one GPU or a beowulf cluster GPU, as long as effective heatsinking is done it probably is not related to the question on how much heat it would generate.
//posting on nvidia based on board display that cost just some $80 for the motherboard...
I would say you are probably right on that it would be less than one raedon x1900xt though..
i wonder
I'm sorry, but you are wrong
copyright, not copywrite.
it's something else.
considering your comment is on 512MB machine with OS 10.4 I couldn't comment further because i was using 10.2 and 256MB of ram at the time.
ketamine
i know i shouldn't reply on the signatures of other people, but really, some people do read playboy for the articles... if people wanted to see all those models, i believe internet would be the cheaper way to go...
anyway...
no need to talk about RISC/CISC stuff here. one word is enough to describe the speed of OSX under G3/G4 <1000MHz -- SLOW.
i've been using mac's from '89 (on a lowly black-and-white powerbook) till now (with the iMac FP) and macos X is simply slow on iMac FP (which is running G4 800MHz). I've seen OSX running in G5 and core duo and it's good. but on anything slower than iMac FP (G4 800) i don't think it's reasonable speed. btw my imac fp is running os9...
well, your uid seems to point to an older generation than 'students'.. :)
i for one do not think that economics is a non-issue here. it's definitely important. if there's no money to aid research then it's almost impossible to get drugs done.
people who have $100000 to spend with colon cancer = a lot
people whose MRSA infection can't be cured with vancomycin = very limited
it's not difficult to understand, isn't it?
i don't think it's seen in the wild, but there's quite a bit of patients died of VRSA already. check http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=p ubmed&term=VRSA
not rumors, indeed. just search in pubmed.
excuse me, but PRSA(tm) is already taken by penicillin-resistant staphylococcus auerus(R), for the matteer.
MRSA is not that hard to treat provided that you have some other antibiotics like vancomycin. Here comes VRSA! :)
then there are amazingly many pseudochristians in the US of A challanging the first amendment rights. I thought that they are real christians. oops.
Judge not, for ye be not judged.
1. Probably not so much for glial cell tumors though.
2. that's right that microwaves, given enough strength can cause genetic damage, but probably not at these dose as people like most of us are receiving from the antenna upstairs
1. microwave signal is not at the 10Hz range. Brain cell do work at that sort of range if you do an EEG but that's totally unrelated. Blood-brain barrier is not made of pores that can dilate unless you cook the pores literally.
2. it's relatively simple to see sun emits more radiation (regardless of the frequency). You don't have to double check, you just have to see whether your skin/hair heat up.
yes, but that the decrease in excess could be the effect due to the need of genetic predisposition (i.e. by the time it decreases, most who are genetically predisposed get the disease, others don't.)
Of course the hypothesis above is dangerous, i knew it, but it is yet another possibility one has to consider in these situations.
For me just one case.
I'm sorry, but in cities like Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore etc, there are thousands of buildings with GSM towers installed, believe it or not.
I don't see how wikipedia is related to my reply, mind to explain a little bit further? as for the last sentence i think anybody who are studying in the field of law would have learnt it already.
just to remind you, there are hundreds of thousands of towers in the world that has those sort of antenna installed. the chance of a clustered cancer related to RF antenna-related to ONLY OCCUR in one single site is, eh, minimal.
btw it was 'prima facie', not 'prima facia', as the original word is from 'facies', and is to be differentiated from 'res ipsa loquitur'.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd= Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=16061124&dopt=Abstrac t
Here are some information from research.
By the way, from my experience, a phone usually has to be in the shirt's pocket before it can inactivate a pacemaker.
http://oem.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/57/11/ 774
g i?artid=1257639#b28-ehp0113-000809
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fc
excess deathes and excess cases
don't have much time to read that through though.
I'm sorry, but even *radioactivity* does take some time to work, especially when it is not high enough in terms of power, as in the power of those used in total body irradiation with stem cell rescue...
note that you are always allowed to use another [more] reliable database here. they set the price, you bought it, that's economics AFAIK.
to give them a fair comment, i would say that i believe they have been doing a good job for quite a while and the security problems are not as problematic as it seems to many of the readers here.