Slashdot Mirror


First Photos of MIT $100 Laptop

An anonymous reader noted that MITs $100 laptop was unveiled at the Seven Countries Task Force Meeting. It runs a special version of the Fedora linux and it comes with native wireless lan support. You can see the photo album, and you can pledge to buy one at triple price... in order to donate 2 of them to children.

659 comments

  1. How adorable!! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Awwwww, look at their little ears! I just wanna pet them!

    1. Re:How adorable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Awwwww, look at their little ears! I just wanna pet them!

      What an incredibly racist thing to say. They're human beings, not animals.

    2. Re:How adorable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, no, they're $100 computers, not human beings. I think you misunderstood the OP.

    3. Re:How adorable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I am an animal, you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:How adorable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am an insensitive clod, you animal!

    5. Re:How adorable!! by Adrilla · · Score: 0

      Wow, I can actually feel the breeze from the joke flying over your head.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    6. Re:How adorable!! by samsonov · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is it me or do the colors come close to a Speak and Spell?

      --
      "You killed my yogurt!" --Fred Fredburger
    7. Re:How adorable!! by Tsen+Wrath · · Score: 1

      The real question is, can i SLI ten of these babies together in order to match the power of one $1000 computer? (price not including dell's $35 off $350 coupon)

    8. Re:How adorable!! by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Not without some serious code parrallelism...

    9. Re:How adorable!! by TheGavster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wind over IP is one of the great technological triumphs of our time

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    10. Re:How adorable!! by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1

      Nah, must be from your end, I think.

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    11. Re:How adorable!! by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      We're all animals except you, P-1.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    12. Re:How adorable!! by Reverend528 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Wind over IP is one of the great technological triumphs of our time

      Alternately, you can send IP Over wind by way of avian carriers. Just be sure to run a virus scanner on your incoming packets to ensure they don't get the bird flu.

    13. Re:How adorable!! by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      I think it was a double joke.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    14. Re:How adorable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm in Soviet Russia, clod insensitive you!

    15. Re:How adorable!! by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Next thing you know, it'll be Wind ows over IP. That's when I'll know I need to set up a firewall to protect my Mac.

      :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    16. Re:How adorable!! by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1

      the colours have probably been chosen so that the devices look attractive to enquisitive minds

      --
      Does it go on forever?
    17. Re:How adorable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human beings aren't animals?

      When the fuck did THIS happen? One minute I'm a mammal, next minute I'm Christ-knows-what!

    18. Re:How adorable!! by torpor · · Score: 1

      the thing is .. and i mean about the less-than-80euro laptop .. is it Wind Up or Wind Down?

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    19. Re:How adorable!! by wolenczak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Finally a laptop I woudn't mind slamming against the wall, color is a plus. hehe, imagine an orange laptop with funny ears flying over your cubicle =)

    20. Re:How adorable!! by cgreuter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but we've had hot air over IP since the early days of USENET and you can run a turbine off of that.

    21. Re:How adorable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I'll get "Flaimbait"ed for this, but...

      NO!

      The whole reason the Yakov's jokes worked is because they referenced Soviet-era surveillance!

      "In California, you can always find party. In Soviet Russia, the Party can always find you!" Like so!

      It's one thing to remove that, and say something like "tobacco smokes you!" That's bad enough... but it at least has a g--damn verb!

      clod insensitive you?! moron f***ing you!

    22. Re:How adorable!! by intangible · · Score: 1

      +1 Ranting

    23. Re:How adorable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. You simply must be retarded if you can't figure out the clickwheel.

    24. Re:How adorable!! by MrSenile · · Score: 1

      -=> ... Over wind by way of avian carriers ... Would that be African or European?

  2. These look great! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The final photo in the set shows three different colours - they all look fantastic - this photo shows the fedora desktop. Also looks great!

    It should be noted that the 'horns' are for directional wireless (and also cover USB ports when not in use) - remember that if you want to mock them!

    I say kudos to AMD, Brightstar, Google, News Corporation, Nortel, and Red Hat for making this possible. It's a pity Gates & Jobs couldn't join in rather then attempting to downplay the fine efforts of this group.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:These look great! by Evro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you recall, Steve Jobs offered to license Mac OS X to this project for free and they refused.

      --
      rooooar
    2. Re:These look great! by stuntpope · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not just 3 different colors - 3 different models. The orange, light blue, and green ones shown all have physical differences. So which one is the one to be produced? I vote for blue.

    3. Re:These look great! by jb.hl.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's a pity Gates & Jobs couldn't join in rather then attempting to downplay the fine efforts of this group.

      Gates maybe, but Jobs offered OS X free of charge but was turned down. He tried, they refused.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:These look great! by tdemark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a pity Gates & Jobs couldn't join in rather then attempting to downplay the fine efforts of this group.

      Which Jobs are you talking about? The only one I am familiar with (Steve), offered free Mac OS X licenses to this group for all the laptops. His offer was declined. You can argue all you want about his motives, but you really can't say that he "downplayed" anything.

      Gates, on the other hand, mocked the group's effort.

    5. Re:These look great! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you recall, Steve Jobs offered to license Mac OS X to this project for free and they refused.

      I do recall. But frankly, that's about as much use as slap in the face with a medium sized trout. It was simply a distraction to:

      1) Make Jobs look good.
      2) Distract attention from red hat.

      Jobs wasn't nasty about it, they way Gates was, but to think that he was being helpful offering OS X is... well, lets just say a little bit of self deception would have to be involved.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    6. Re:These look great! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      It should be noted that the 'horns' are for directional wireless (and also cover USB ports when not in use) - remember that if you want to mock them!

      I was thinking that *BSD would be a great choice as an OS, it would be a backdoor attempt to keep the Daemon's image out there.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    7. Re:These look great! by FyRE666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you recall, Steve Jobs offered to license Mac OS X to this project for free and they refused.

      Yeah, maybe the caveat that it required the purchase of a powermac G5 with widescreen monitor to qualify wasn't popular?

    8. Re:These look great! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      External moving parts are the ones that have the greatest damage potential, so the "ears" could prove to be a liability.

      Whether the Jobs OS X offer was genuine or not, or the motivations thereof, is kind of an academic exercise, but I can't imagine the bad press Apple would get if Negroponte accepted but later Apple retracted the offer. If it was a bluff, then the blowback potential would have been huge. The offer was made but declined, so I don't know what else Apple could have done to make you happy, short of opening the source for these notebooks, but I don't think that is realistic.

    9. Re:These look great! by sammy+baby · · Score: 1, Funny
      It should be noted that the 'horns' are for directional wireless (and also cover USB ports when not in use) - remember that if you want to mock them!

      The horns don't make me want to mock them - I just find it ironic that they didn't go with another operating system.
    10. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something that can be altered and adapted for the project and installed on the "real" computer that someday will hopefully replace the $100 laptop vs. contacting Apple with every problem and needing a 3D accelerator to keep the framerate of the GUI up.

    11. Re:These look great! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The only one I am familiar with (Steve), offered free Mac OS X licenses to this group for all the laptops. His offer was declined [macnn.com]. You can argue all you want about his motives,

      Jobs was aware of the requirements of the one laptop per child project & new that OS X was totally unsuited. I think offering that license knowing it would be refused & cause confusion amongst mac fans was distracting, detracting & downplaying the project.

      but you really can't say that he "downplayed" anything.

      I'm afraid I just did :D

      I do agree with you tho' that Job's was smarter & classier about his downplaying then Gate's vitriol & pettiness.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    12. Re:These look great! by coop535 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Belinda and Gates are attacking a different set of problems and they're doing it everywhere. I think their viewpoint is that this project's priorities are out of whack. Education is great, provided the person will live to use it.

      Letter from Bill and Melinda Gates

      We believe health is the cornerstone of human development. When health takes hold, life improves by all measures. Conversely, poor health aggravates poverty, poverty deepens disease, and nations trapped in this spiral will not escape without the world's help. In Africa, the cost of malaria in terms of treatment and lost productivity is estimated to be $12 billion a year. The continent's gross domestic product could be $100 billion higher today if malaria had been eliminated in the 1960s. And if HIV infection rates continue at their present levels, the world will likely see 45 million new infections by 2010 and lose nearly 70 million people by 2020. That's 70 million of the most productive members of society - health workers, educators, and parents.

      Therefore, the foundation's Global Health program works to ensure that lifesaving advances in health are created and shared with those who need them most. Our primary focus areas are HIV/AIDS, TB, malaria, child survival and childhood immunization, and maternal and reproductive health.

      To begin, we invest heavily in research to help discover new and better products, particularly vaccines. The foundation also supports work to develop products that can be manufactured and distributed. Then, once a product is developed, we work to make sure that there are systems in place to adopt and sustain these new drugs as they become available. The foundation is a major supporter of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI). This alliance has provided basic immunizations to over 8 million children who would not otherwise have been immunized. As a result, GAVI has already saved an estimated 500,000 children's lives.

      ---

      The most pessimistic person could view this project akin to what Apple did when working with schools to get Apple software & hardware in cheap: become the defacto standard via goodwill. Get in early so that when they leave school they come back. Besides, that same person's pessimistic view will believe that they'll be stolen from schools as they'll be the most valuable thing in the school. (due to the fantastic engineering fortitude which is obvious to all).

    13. Re:These look great! by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      That's all fine but the best thing for any community is to thrive technologically. This elevates the community as a whole opening the door to prosperity in general. These ideas don't have to be mutually exclusive. I assure you, Gates didn't play this down because he thinks feeding and clothing them is more important. He did so because it's not his idea and isn't running MS software.

    14. Re:These look great! by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      If it would be mine words, I would say - THANKS GOD!

      There are things where commercial interest and companies are welcome. THIS is not that case.

      And believe me, I am not some anti-business freak. Simply, there are many places where monetary interest of big companies is not welcome.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    15. Re:These look great! by RCO · · Score: 1

      How do you figure Mac OS-X is unsuited for this project?

      --
      'And all the monkeys aren't in the zoo Every day you meet quite a few...'
    16. Re:These look great! by harrkev · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, a lot of problems can be traced back to lack of education. The solution to AIDS is obvious. Abstinence is guaranteed to be effective. Condoms help a lot. There is no magic drug that will make people practice either of these. Focusing on AIDS drugs is like working on a better way to put out a fire -- much better to not have a fire in the first place. Simply stated, AIDS is spread by behavior. Education can help to change behavior.

      Let's look at other problems. Many countries in Africa are politically unstable. Certain tribes/countries/ethnic groups want to kill the others. They are raised to think of the "other group" (whoever that may be) as the enemy/evil/not-to-be-trusted. It has been proven that the Internet can break down borders. On a forum (including ones like this), you can have people from dozens of countries putting in their opinion. It helps people to understand their near and distant neighbors.

      Finally, some countries have a culture of corruption. When aid gets sent from foreign countries, there is sometimes lots of "palm greasing" just to get the supplies to those who need them the most. And even if the supplies get there, sometimes a few guys with guns take it all away. This is "just the way things are." So, what happens if the children are educated to realize that things do not have to be that way? It is possible that in a decade or two, opinions could start to change.

      This is not just about reading, 'riting, and 'rithmatic. This is about changing the way that people see the world.

      I do admit that this OLPC is not LIKELY to do all of that. But if it changes the life of even a few children, maybe those children will grow up to be the next president/prime minishter/grand poobah of their countries.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    17. Re:These look great! by larkost · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that what Jobs had to offer was not what they wanted anyways... os how exactly do you wind up with the idea that Jobs acted in a negative fashion at all?

    18. Re:These look great! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what it is that you expected Steve Jobs to do in this case. Open source OS X so that would be compatible?

      Face it, you're letting your enjoyment of tormenting mac fanatics (which is commendable most of the time) get in the way of your grasp of reality.

      There's plenty you can needle us Mac users about without spinning facts like a GOP drone.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    19. Re:These look great! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what it is that you expected Steve Jobs to do in this case. Open source OS X so that would be compatible?

      I think Steve Jobs should have done nothing. He knew OS X was unsuitable as it wasn't Open Source & required too much overhead without heavy customisation. Knowing that - why did he offer?

      To me, he just looked like a child annoyed that someone else's toy was getting more attention then his.

      Face it, you're letting your enjoyment of tormenting mac fanatics (which is commendable most of the time) get in the way of your grasp of reality.

      I have never let facts get in my way :D

      There's plenty you can needle us Mac users about without spinning facts like a GOP drone.

      True, true, but I do try and keep things at least vaguely on topic...

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    20. Re:These look great! by uradu · · Score: 1

      That is true and can't seriously be argued with, except to say that more than one type of help can be offered at the same time. Problems don't have to be addressed sequentially, because you can't seriously say that "once we've solved the hunger issue, we'll attack the technology bit." Hunger will possibly never be solved for all people on the planet, so we may never get to step 2 for those people whose hunger problem IS solved. Besides, people like Negroponte are technologists, not social workers or humanitarians of the food acquring type. He tries to help in the ways HE knows how, while AT THE SAME TIME others can do THEIR best in the food etc. departments.

    21. Re:These look great! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      It's hard to hate a troll that makes me laugh. =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    22. Re:These look great! by macphile84 · · Score: 1, Informative

      The solution to AIDS is obvious. Abstinence is guaranteed to be effective.

      Unfortunately, that just isn't true. I don't know the number off the top of my head, but a large percentage of AIDS victims are so not because of sex, but from unclean medical and drug environments. People get HIV/AIDS from blood transfusions, immunizations, and illegal drug use as well.

    23. Re:These look great! by huckda · · Score: 1

      Looking at those pre-elementary school designs I would have mocked them as well.
      They look ridiculous, and I find it hard to believe their lifespan will be longer than 3 months unless the goofy looking plastic and wireless "ears" is considerably more durable than it appears.

      That doesn't take away from the effort though...$100 for a 'modern', fully functional mobile computer for "kids"(not sure what age they are targeting but I don't see any high schoolers with a great interest in those) is a great idea and it's nie to see it coming to fruition.

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    24. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gates has often said (I'm paraphrasing from memory) that most children in the 3rd world would be much better off with simpler, more low-tech assistance such as vaccines and medical opportunities we'd have taken for granted 80 years ago, as opposed to shiny new gadgets like servers that run via solar power (where's the WiFi going to come *from* when the nearest modern city is 800 miles away?).

      Given that, note what the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gives its money to.

      Cheerio.

    25. Re:These look great! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Thanks :-)

      I do aim to please!

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    26. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For one, it takes more resources to run than any version of MS Windows (Yeah, including Vista, not including the new GUI stuff which can be disabled).

    27. Re:These look great! by cwgmpls · · Score: 5, Insightful
      1) You can't run OSX on a 400 MHz AMD processor with 128 Meg of RAM. (If you know how, please let me know!)

      2) Apple would never allow an OSX laptop to retail at $300 in the U.S., which is what OLPC is doing.

      3) One of the design goals of OLPC was to be totally open source, to allow third parties to tinker with it and improve the entire system at will. I don't see how OSX could be part of a purely open-source project.

    28. Re:These look great! by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
    29. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try. Any honest appraisal of the data available on the Gates Foundation website reveals a large part of the claimed yearly donations are software given to schools and libraries. Additional, the notion that that people of different colour can't have both health and technology is a false dichotomy, and that they'ld probably just steal the latter anyway the most racist public proclamation I've read today. Though it's still early. Finally, since we're all just happily impuning motives, while you're straightening the halo on Bill's head don't look to closely at the billions in profits - the difference between income and disbursements - the G&MGF have made every year since establishment. That doesn't make the Foundation a bad thing though it is fair evidence the Gates are yet prime candidates for the first husband and wife canonization.

    30. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been proven that the Internet can break down borders. On a forum (including ones like this), you can have people from dozens of countries putting in their opinion. It helps people to understand their near and distant neighbors.

      Nonsense. The Internet does nothing but help you quarrel with your distant neighbors more easily. I blame anonymous telecommunication for encouraging the precipitous decline in civility and political discourse over the past fifteen years. I guarantee that if you give Internet access to a Hutu and Tutsi, they'll use it to troll and flame each other, then arrange a time and place to go at it with the machetes.

    31. Re:These look great! by Senzei · · Score: 1

      Any specific reason why those are the only two reasons instead of "it was a philanthropic act that could also turn into a smart business move"? What, specifically, is wrong with being helpful and helping your business at the same time?

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
    32. Re:These look great! by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know that there are other ways to get AIDS. Sheesh. But you must certainly admit that behavioral changes can make you 99.999999% certain NOT to get it. So, tell me. How many cases do you think there are of hemopheliacs getting AIDS from blood there are in Africa? In that continent, sex is the primary reason for the spread of AIDS.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    33. Re:These look great! by alienw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think a laptop like this could possibly run OS X. That system is extremely resource-hungry and would need a lot of modifications to squeeze it onto such an underpowered machine. That's probably the reason they refused.

    34. Re:These look great! by letxa2000 · · Score: 0, Troll
      This is Slashdot. If business profits, it's evil. Period. Never mind that most Slashdotters make a living because the business they work for makes a profit. Isn't hypocrisy a wonderful thing? :)

    35. Re:These look great! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because it's obvious the OS X without the source was not going to be of any use on these laptops.

      Jobs new that - therefore his motivation for making the offer was not altruistic.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    36. Re:These look great! by RCO · · Score: 1

      While I'm not aware of all the req's on this project, I suspect that if they striped OS X down it could run on that hardware. I'm not even going to discuss you statement in number two, since I have no way of arguing the point. #3 sounds very valid, but like I said, I'm unaware of the ground rules for this project.

      Thanks

      --
      'And all the monkeys aren't in the zoo Every day you meet quite a few...'
    37. Re:These look great! by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      In that continent, sex is the primary reason for the spread of AIDS


      What percentage of that sex is voluntary? Women forced into prostitution, rape victims and wives don't usually have the option of refusing sex. Hell, in some particularly screwed-up societies, it's believed that having sex with a virgin will cure you of AIDS... so you end up with many children being raped by people with AIDS. How is recommending abstinence going to help them?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    38. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What percentage of that sex is voluntary? Women forced into prostitution, rape victims and wives don't usually have the option of refusing sex. Hell, in some particularly screwed-up societies, it's believed that having sex with a virgin will cure you of AIDS... so you end up with many children being raped by people with AIDS.

      problem? solution: the anti-sex condom.

    39. Re:These look great! by menace3society · · Score: 1

      You're right on about the other stuff, but as for AIDS, well, if you could come up with a vaccine that would be great. It's pretty much an established fact that viral infections are impossible to cure with drugs, but if a way can be found to prevent it from taking over the immune system, the disease could be eradicated in our lifetime (a la smallpox for the most part).

    40. Re:These look great! by slocan · · Score: 1

      That's a letter from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, not from Microsoft.

      Bill Gates does have commendable initiatives regarding development, altough these are not necessarily advanced by Microsoft.

      Bill, as in Microsoft speaking, ridiculed the $100 laptop project.

      >> I think their viewpoint is that this project's priorities are out of whack.

      If the laptop were to ship with a Windows version taylored for it, would Bill think the project's priorities were "out of whack"?

      I think that Bill's (as in Microsoft's) viewpoint is that the project will make an inroad in the Windows monopoly, in economys that have enormous growth potential, both as IT service providers and hardware and software consumers.

      As Microsoft, Bill's viewpoint is that of an (monopolistic) enterprise, not of a Foundation.

    41. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure OS X would run swimmingly on 128MB of RAM and a 500MHz processor with no 3D acceleration.

    42. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certain tribes/countries/ethnic groups want to kill the others. They are raised to think of the "other group" (whoever that may be) as the enemy/evil/not-to-be-trusted.

      Fortunately, we here in America are above all that.

    43. Re:These look great! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      While I'm not aware of all the req's on this project, I suspect that if they striped OS X down it could run on that hardware.

      But they can't strip os x down without (3) the source can they?

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    44. Re:These look great! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe they're aimed at developing countries, where they're likely to be treated with a bit more respect. To many kids these would be amazing pieces of technology, be they 5 or 15.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    45. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to AIDS is obvious. Abstinence is guaranteed to be effective.

      WRONG. In countries with tropical diseases, (open sores) sex is NOT the only avenue of transmission.

    46. Re:These look great! by John+Newman · · Score: 1
      1) You can't run OSX on a 400 MHz AMD processor with 128 Meg of RAM. (If you know how, please let me know!)
      Well, given that OS X now famously runs on Intel, and that plenty of Mac users still happily run various versions of OS X on 400 MHz G3's with 128 MB of RAM, it's surely possible. If Jobs offered, he must have been ready to put his OS where his mouth was.

      But I agree with the good folks at MIT that the OS must be open-source, to allow complete transparency and tinkerability and to prevent any one vendor from being able to dictate terms to the project later on.
    47. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, you BSD people and your constant "backdoor attempts." Why can't you just leave the asses of the world alone?

    48. Re:These look great! by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 1
      The solution to AIDS is obvious. Abstinence is guaranteed to be effective.

      Not true. AIDS is also known to be commonly transmitted through shared hypodermic needle use. There are other vectors as well.

      Unless you were speaking in the longer term (100 years) sense that the clildren of people who practice life-long abstinance are guaranteed not to die from AIDS.

      But in the broader sense, I agree. Any solution which does not include education will be ineffective.

      Or, as my mother used to say, "Give a man a fish, and you've satisfied him for but a single meal. Teach a man to fish, and you can get rid of him for the whole weekend."

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    49. Re:These look great! by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [i]Because it's obvious the OS X without the source was not going to be of any use on these laptops.[/i]

      What on earth are you talking about? It might not be useful to you, but to some kids who now have word processors, spreadsheets, the ability to send and receive email and chat and so forth, it would be absolutely fanstastic. Jobs would have to commit to supporting the laptop for some time, though.... they couldn't just donate 100,000 licenses.

      But still, while I can see white Linux was a better choice, I don't think the offer was anything to sneeze at - it was quite generous, even if ultimately self serving. What's wrong with an arrangement being mutually beneficial?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    50. Re:These look great! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Education is great, provided the person will live to use it.

      Alternately, a life without education isn't worth very much.

    51. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Abstinence is guaranteed to be effective." just look at the slashdot users. Give them open source laptops and they are bound to conform :P.

    52. Re:These look great! by demachina · · Score: 1

      "Finally, some countries have a culture of corruption."

      I think all countries have a culture of corruption, its just a question of degree and pervasiveness. The U.S. doesn't seem particularly superior in this regard. For example the pinnacle of U.S. governance our Congress and executive branch are apparently rife with corruption. Duke Cunningham was handing out defense contracts in exchange for expensive homes, a yacht, cars and antiques. A Louisiana Congressmen apparently had a freezer full of bribe money. Jack Abramoff apparently had Tom DeLay, Robert Ney and probably others in his back pocket and got legislation custom written to benefit himself and his clients. The Alaska delegation got a couple hundred million to build a bridge to nowhere. The Mississippi delegation, Trent Lott in particular, tacked $700 million or so on to a defense bill to move a rail line inland to improve the tourist, real estate and gambling potential of the Mississippi coast. This rail line had been destroyed in Katrina, and already rebuilt at a cost of a couple hundred million, now its being torn apart and moved at tax payer expense mostly to benefit local developers. The Iraq war turned out to be a giant candy store for war profiteering by one company after another with the right connections to the powers that be in the Republican party.

      So no, you don't have to bribe local officials to deliver things in the U.S., usually, but then too the wholesale corruption in the Federal government involve sums that are larger than the GDP of many African nations.

      --
      @de_machina
    53. Re:These look great! by h00pla · · Score: 1
      Well said!. Only in the egocentric so-called "first" world do we have so much disposable stuff that we would worry about breaking it.

      I am very pleased to see these machines working, however they might look. This is very important project. So much so that even Bill Gates is worried they're going to be a success. I wish him luck on his 'Mobile Phone Running Windows' project.

      --
      I've been swashdotted -- Elmer Fudd
    54. Re:These look great! by skarphace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It might not be useful to you, but to some kids who now have word processors, spreadsheets, the ability to send and receive email and chat and so forth, it would be absolutely fanstastic.

      The goal of the project was to help jumpstart Computer Literacy, not just give them a word processor and spreadsheet.

      For these laptops to actually have a deep affect and teach a lot, they need to be able to get into the deep parts of the OS. If a kid learns how to type up a report, that might help himself, but if a kid learns how to hack a kernel, it would help his community.

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    55. Re:These look great! by mungtor · · Score: 1

      Yep. Congrats on finding an even faster, cheaper, and easier way to outsource technical jobs. Brilliant. Now instead of somebody in India I'll get a 12 year-old in Bolivia who is skipping school to make 15 cents/hour. Fabulous.

    56. Re:These look great! by harrkev · · Score: 1

      So, you are saying that because rape happens, all is lost and we should not even try education at all. Hmmm.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    57. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gates could have open sourced win98SE.... It would have run wonderfully on a machine with those specs if you used 98Lite to remove some of the useless components (hell, it would run in 64Megs of RAM once trimmed down), and have people used to using windows, while not giving code away that would really reveal anything useful to the developed world in general. There is even a shitload of software out there that would have run on it.... That would actually have been a smart move. It would have cost them nothing, fostered a lot of good will... might even have looked good to the OSS community and would have left them with something useful.

    58. Re:These look great! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Why can't you just leave the asses of the world alone?

      If you have to ask, I can't explain.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    59. Re:These look great! by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Hell, in some particularly screwed-up societies, it's believed that having sex with a virgin will cure you of AIDS.

      Kind of illustrates the OP's point that education is the ultimate solution, doesn't it?

    60. Re:These look great! by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      True. If you're wondering why, though, I think you answered it. (grin)

    61. Re:These look great! by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Many of the people exposed to education won't live to use it, but that is a reasonable expectation and no cause not to educate them.
      Education does not save everyone. Those it DOES reach and who choose to use it well justify the investment.
      Human processes are sloppy. Third World cultures have high death and disease rates because of the choices their adults make.
      Education can give some of them tools to make better choices.
      Instead of the whinging about "computers not being food", maybe we should understand the food perpetuates bad systems while education offers hope for changing them!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    62. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...Mac users still happily run various versions of OS X on 400 MHz G3's with 128 MB of RAM..."

      Try it - on a dual G5 if you like and see how it behaves - let us know how it goes.

    63. Re:These look great! by Gattman01 · · Score: 1
      Well, given that OS X now famously runs on Intel, and that plenty of Mac users still happily run various versions of OS X on 400 MHz G3's with 128 MB of RAM, it's surely possible.


      This isn't necessarily true.
      PPC and x86 architectures are different. RISC vs CISC.
      Anyone who has taken an introduction to processor design class and understood it, can tell you that 400 Mhz on architecture does not mean the same thing as 400 Mhz on another processor, especially with RISC vs CISC.
      Many other things need to be taken into consideration in addition to the clock rate, like the number of clock cycles needed to execute an instruction.

      But I agree with the good folks at MIT that the OS must be open-source, to allow complete transparency and tinkerability and to prevent any one vendor from being able to dictate terms to the project later on.

      I agree that this is important.
    64. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teach a man to fish, and you can get rid of him for the whole weekend.

      I think Brokeback Mountain did a lot to change our views about men going off for a whole weekend of fishing.

    65. Re:These look great! by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

      no need to talk about RISC/CISC stuff here. one word is enough to describe the speed of OSX under G3/G4 <1000MHz -- SLOW.

      i've been using mac's from '89 (on a lowly black-and-white powerbook) till now (with the iMac FP) and macos X is simply slow on iMac FP (which is running G4 800MHz). I've seen OSX running in G5 and core duo and it's good. but on anything slower than iMac FP (G4 800) i don't think it's reasonable speed. btw my imac fp is running os9...

    66. Re:These look great! by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      even Fedora is needing a lot of modifications :
      * The distribution continues to get smaller; it is now down to about 250MB uncompressed (from 400MB last week). (With JFFS2 compression, we can expect this to go down another 50%!) There is still low-hanging fruit left to pull out of the image, including bitmap fonts we don't use (7MB), the X font server (1MB) and Perl (30MB). Removing the fat out of other system resources will require more effort. We'll continue to report on the ever-shrinking distribution in the coming weeks.
      note that 250mb compressed to 125mb is still a quarter of the 512mb Flash storage (is it wrong to assume that the OS is on that same store?). on a side note, i can't believe that we're passing up on this chance to introduce the children of the world to Perl. it's like a lost opportunity to bring people together in a shared global "are you sure this line of code does that?"
    67. Re:These look great! by spun · · Score: 1

      Profit is what is left over after expenses are paid for. Employees are an expense. Profit is for paying investors, who don't actually work to get their money. /pedant

      That being said, most slashdotters approve of fair profits. We just don't like scam artists stealing obscene amounts of money and then claiming they are doing good because selfishness is next to godliness. That's not hypocritical, it's just common sense, and not liking being screwed by rich and powerful sociopaths.

      You're not pro-getting-screwed-over-by-sociopaths, are you?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    68. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually agree with the issues of healthcare and such, but firstly there are many people in the "developed" world who have the resources to help those less fortunate, and therefore this project is worthwhile as it's contributors can do more to help it along than they can to help releive starvation, for example. (Contributors can work from home without having to spend any money [therefore that money can be given to other charities]). By having many projects targetting many issues in parallel people's skills can be used to their full advantage (I would be of little use in a worldwide "Help tsunami victims to rebuild" campaign, for example, but instead I can help in an area where my abilities are magnified).
      As a second point, I would like to say that if Bill Gates is more focused on healthcare and such, rather than education and worldwide computing, then why the hell is he offering the rent-a-PC scheme that was recently announced? He wants to play down an area which he knows FLOSS can do better in (in terms of values, not technical superiority), even though he recognises it is an important issue (well, he would use the word "market" instead)

    69. Re:These look great! by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      No - that's computer literacy for a programmer or an engineer, but the public at large considers computer literacy being able to actually USE a computer. A lot of these third world citizens have never even touched a computer, and now you want them to jump straight into developing the OS?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    70. Re:These look great! by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      The goal of the project was to help jumpstart Computer Literacy, not just give them a word processor and spreadsheet. For these laptops to actually have a deep affect and teach a lot, they need to be able to get into the deep parts of the OS. If a kid learns how to type up a report, that might help himself, but if a kid learns how to hack a kernel, it would help his community.

      Your comments are terribly unrealistic.

      In a rich, developed country, where computer jobs are plentiful and there is all kinds of time to sit around puttering on the machine, maybe 1 in 50,000 people get anywhere near "hack[ing] a kernel". You think this 0.002% are the only people whose computer literacy helps their communities?

      The children who help their communities are going to be the ones who learn to read, learn how to look up information about health, agriculture, engineering, and learn how to find market data about the goods they are consuming and producing.

      And putting all that aside, even with OSX installed on the machine, there's nothing stopping your putative malnourished kernel hacker from installing Linux when/if the time comes.

      As someone who spent a fair bit of time in the developing world tasked with getting people working in Linux, I have come to the conclusion that without the all-too-rare emergence of a hyper-motivated and highly intelligent geek who is part of the community and committed to stay (despite the economic opportunities that these traits would provide elsewhere), such efforts are largely a disservice. Linux still requires too much handholding for people without strong computer backgrounds. Once the foreigners with the weird software have flown away, they can only provide so much support, and eventually either the computers stop being used or someone with a practical bent installs Windows on them.

      I'm not sure whether that (installing Windows) is an option with this hardware, but without it, I think there are going to be a lot of brightly-coloured doorstops sprucing up African villages over the next few years.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    71. Re:These look great! by broeman · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I saw the "The Code Breakers" on BBC World the last couple of weeks, which was a show on this programme fra the United Nations. Their main goal is not to _just_ giving out laptops, but laptops with F/OSS. Another programme is busses in India that drives around poor areas to educate children in computers, the Internet and F/OSS.

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
    72. Re:These look great! by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      no, if a kid learns how to hack a kernel, it would help *your* community

      Linux does not make parched sahel more productive, will not fetch clean water and will probably not ward off infectious diseases (okay maybe it's less prone to viruses).

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    73. Re:These look great! by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      I think the issue was that these laptops don't have the resources to run OS X. As is, they run a stripped down version of Linux.

      Plus it has somthing to do with OS X not being open source. You want the people in these developing countries being able to take this system and make it do things the development team never thought of. Linux being open source allows for this. For the same reason, Windows CE is inappropriate.

    74. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, either run or swim, anything else is just treading water

    75. Re:These look great! by sandmaninator · · Score: 1


      Excellent point.
      More broadly, There needs to be cultural change in these devastated societies. The Bill and Melinda foundation is treating the symptoms. Cultural change is the only cure.

    76. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "To begin, we invest heavily in research to help discover new and better products, particularly vaccines. The foundation also supports work to develop products that can be manufactured and distributed. Then, once a product is developed, we work to make sure that there are systems in place to adopt and sustain these new drugs as they become available. The foundation is a major supporter of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI). This alliance has provided basic immunizations to over 8 million children who would not otherwise have been immunized. As a result, GAVI has already saved an estimated 500,000 children's lives."

      Africa just does not seem to be going anywhere, while all other parts of the world are in progress.
      It just does not seem to work in Africa. Foreign companies are still the main beneficiaries of all the resources and production there, now hand in hand with local, corrupt governments, militias, tribes.

      The general African population at large is living in hellish conditions - with no foreseeable end of there sufferings - and quite frankly, not much hope to any fundamental change. At least, I can't see any unique, value-added industry or product emerging from that region. I can't see the signs of modernization that might lead to economical, social miracles.

      Under those conditions, it's questionable whether even trying to keep alive people is the "good choice".
      You really wonder if an other day in hell is a true blessing, or just prolonging the sufferings.

      "Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI)... has already saved an estimated 500,000 children's lives."

      Have those lives been saved for real - or just to give the "opportunity" to become a child soldier, a child mother, who gives birth to a fatally ill baby?

      Or to be the devil's advocate: have those lives been saved for the benefit of member companies of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) for a relatively isolated, experimental product lab with humans, who won't complain, who can't sue them for all the trials and errors of refining the new drugs, vaccines - which then will be sold to "real people": customers, who can buy them?

    77. Re:These look great! by TheNumberless · · Score: 1

      now you want them to jump straight into developing the OS?

      They should have that option, should they choose to exercise it. Why impose artificial restrictions just because they're poor?

    78. Re:These look great! by john82 · · Score: 1
      Apple would never allow an OSX laptop to retail at $300 in the U.S., which is what OLPC is doing.

      RTFA. There is no point in bashing Jobs or Apple for a non-event. The laptop will NOT be available of sale. The petition that is linked was assembled in the hope that they could convince Negroponte to go along.

      However, here is what the Media Project has announced about the so-called $300 buy-one-donate-two "offer":
      We appreciate your interest in the $100 Laptop initiative.

      If your message is related to purchasing: please note that the $100 laptops--not yet in production--will not be available for sale. The laptops will only be distributed to schools directly through large government initiatives.

      Inquiries about buying the laptop regretfully cannot be answered.

      Thank you.
    79. Re:These look great! by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Exactly. We need more education here. More of the "right vs. wrong" type, instead of the "if it feels good, do it." Hey, it feel REAL good to have somebody hand you $100,000 in a briefcase, but it's probably wrong.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    80. Re:These look great! by cwgmpls · · Score: 1
      When I read the article earlier today, the pledge link was down (probably slashdotted) so I couldn't read the details. But the upshot is that there is at least a proposal to make the laptops available for $300.

      After seeing the details, I agree there is no mechanism in place to sell them for that price at this time. But if OS X were in the picture, even making such a proposal would not be an option. At least Fedora gives OLPC the flexibility to make such offers in the future.

      Besides, points 1) and 3) still stand.

    81. Re:These look great! by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Why Fedora? Fedora is designed to be a desktop system, not an embedded system. They really should start with something small (might I suggest Debian), and then add what they need.

      Plus, if the kids had Debian they could later buy a bigger disk and apt-get install whatever they need!

      --
      My other car is first.
    82. Re:These look great! by dbIII · · Score: 1
      The solution to AIDS is obvious. Abstinence is guaranteed to be effective.
      Yes, but the identical rate of sexually transmitted diseases among those that took the pledge and those that didn't shown by a recent study shows that human fallibility is also a very major factor. A lot of people are not going to be as morally pure as they say they will be, and instead of going on about "divine retribution" on their fallible genitals and living with collatoral damage on those that are less fallible we should have a second line of defence.

      As for the silly option of spending the majority of the money in preaching abstinence - getting the message out is cheap unless we want to overpay celebrities the people we want to contact would never have heard of anyway.

      As said above - education can be the solution to a lot of problems and communication can be the solution or a way to find a solution to a lot of others. These cheap laptops can provide communication and education. Some of the naysayers who say we should only send food are perhaps the same ones who in maths class looked at simple geometry and wondered aloud why they should ever have to learn such things since they never thought beyond the examples of finding the height of a tree from it's shadow. Some of todays most brilliant engineers are from places like little villages in Nigeria - they are not just helping their old hometown but advancing technology to improve the lot of the entire world.

    83. Re:These look great! by soliptic · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The solution to AIDS is obvious. Abstinence is guaranteed to be effective.

      Er... right.

      Apart from rape. Or AIDS transferance via blood transfusions. Or sharing needles.

      That said, your point of education leading to behavioural change is very true and very important.

      (Full disclosure: I work for an international development charity which has HIV/AIDS as one of it's highest priorities.)

    84. Re:These look great! by bm17 · · Score: 1

      What use is OS X without expensive 3D accelerator hardware?

    85. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing is for sure. As far as human suffering goes, basic things like food and clean water would definitely be a priority over laptops and wireless internet.

      I think there's definitely going to be a niche for this laptop though, for $100, hey I want one!!! But I'm sure there are poorer areas of the world that have basic needs met, and could use a cheap durable computing device. So I think what MIT and the ppl involved in this project are doing is great.

      But obviously, the fundamental physical needs of people take priority if you're trying to alleviate human suffering. Maybe the Gates Foundation and MIT's project can coexist? Gate's working on those basic human issues which some ppl desperately need. And MIT using their brilliant minds and engineering prowess at what they are good at, making a cheap technological solution for the poor but not facing extinction pplz so they can take part in the larger world and have opportunities to be successful. It can be win - win with both organizations.

      I am curious wrt Gate's, what percentage of his wealth is he is donating in goodwill towards making the world a better place? Regular folks are already heavily taxed, considering all the hidden taxes as well, and some still give significant amounts. Even if it's not flashy flamboyant millions or billions to help others, the percent of what they have that they offer in goodwill may be a lot. I'm just wondering if Gates is actually doing a lot via percentages or if it is more token along with a lot of PR where marketing and photo ops could mean more than the actual money given in charity. Just musing about intentions...

      And this ending comment in passing may be controversial considering all you in-the-box thinkers... but I believe that vaccinations are harmful, and part of a program to inflict harm on human beings. I've seen lots of data to back this up. Vaccinations are worthless, and there's many studies to show that. They're loaded with toxic chemicals too...

    86. Re:These look great! by eldepeche · · Score: 1

      Er, why would windows be more useful than linux to a person who has never used a computer before?

    87. Re:These look great! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      The chances of OS X being stripped down to the extent necessary is zero.

      Consider the graphics subsystem. X, for all its faults, degrades gracefully. If you have lots of memory then you can enable compositing or even fully OpenGL accelerated graphics which OS X doesn't actually have and won't until they enable Quartz 2D Extreme. But if you don't have lots of memory - and these machines have nearly none (no swap remember!) - then you can fall back to the redraw-on-demand model very easily. In the OS X graphics model it would be very difficult to support such a mode.

      Consider the desktop environment. It's designed in such a way that it wastes screen space. The dock is the only way to switch windows and it is primarily designed to look pretty, not conserve screen space or processing power. Maximizing a window doesn't maximize it, instead it makes it the "ideal size" - probably leaving plenty of space around the edges. On Linux desktop environments are pluggable. On MacOS X there is only one and it's deeply coupled with the rest of the operating system.

      Consider the low level performance requirements. Objective-C on Mach-O is very slow and this is well documented. C on ELF is very fast (once fixup has been performed).

      But technological problems can be solved, given enough time and effort. The real kiler is this - consider the political requirements. Apple could revoke the OLPCs free license to OS X at any time, effectively ending the project overnight. Not possible with Linux.

    88. Re:These look great! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Hell, in some particularly screwed-up societies, it's believed that having sex with a virgin will cure you of AIDS.

      Kind of illustrates the OP's point that education is the ultimate solution, doesn't it?


      Yup. And this is the main point that seems to be missed in this flamefest.

      In a lot of the world, people are kept poor and helpless by a system that effectively prevents them from learning how they could get out of the hole they were born into.

      One very real prospect with this One Laptop Per Child project is that it will provide an information path past societies' controlling elite. People will be able to learn that things like "sex with a virgin will cure you of AIDS" are lies. They'll be able to learn the truth about such diseases, despite the efforts of their "superiors" to keep them ignorant. They'll learn that things are different in other parts of the world, and they'll learn why.

      It'll be interesting to see what sort of controls are put on this technology in various parts of the world. Bill Gates can't be the only powerful person with reason to dislike it and want to control it.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    89. Re:These look great! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Why Fedora? Fedora is designed to be a desktop system, not an embedded system.

      I can imagine a likely reason that RedHat is involved. These laptops will have their own "mesh" wireless software to communicate. But this won't get them out onto the Internet, where all the educational (and entertainment) stuff sits. For that, a local population of laptops needs a gateway/server. RedHat makes those, and they're pretty good.

      I'll guess that their plan is to give away a few of these as "starter" systems, to get the kids connected. But there will soon be demand for more, and some of the population will have enough money to buy better systems. RedHat will look like the Good Guys, so guess who will be the first choice for the new systems. I'd think that an Ubuntu system might be better, but what do I know?

      Also note that this is a situation where Steve Jobs might have a chance. Packaging up a Mac Mini as a gateway to serve as an Internet link for a flock of these laptops could work very well. Maybe some folks at Apple are thinking of this; maybe not and they'll let RedHat do it. Stay tuned.

      Anyway, this is probably what really worries Bill Gates. Around the world there will be a generation whose first machine wasn't Windows; it was that little linux toy. How is MS going to sell anything in that market?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    90. Re:These look great! by bensonwu · · Score: 1

      Oh, plus a hand from Taiwan's Quanta for devoting substantial resources to the OLPC project. Taiwan's Quanta teams up with MIT for R&D project http://www.itworld.com/Comp/1290/050411quantamit/ Quanta Gets Behind $100 Laptop http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/quanta-gets-beh ind-100-laptop-143304.php

    91. Re:These look great! by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Uh, Redhat doesn't make routers. That said... any Linux system can perform in that capacity and there is nothing that dinstiguishes Redhat from its competition.

    92. Re:These look great! by WCD_Thor · · Score: 1

      I really wonder if the bright coloring and kid friendly design costs more than it would to make it less stylish, say a $95 laptop instead, lol.

    93. Re:These look great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should change your sig? After all the stories been posted, you look a bit dopey.

    94. Re:These look great! by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Ummm what? I thought the idea was to get people comfortable with using computers, and give them some of the benefits of the internet. I doubt that many, if any, will be using these as OS development platforms.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    95. Re:These look great! by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      As a software developer who often works remotely from a 867Mhz G4 revA 12" Powerbook, OS 10.4 has never been a problem for me, given >= 512MB. While I'd love a shiny new MacBook, I wouldn't consider my current machine slow. It's well within in the acceptable range.

      I do agree that 400MHz with 128MB RAM *would* likely be slow though.

    96. Re:These look great! by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

      considering your comment is on 512MB machine with OS 10.4 I couldn't comment further because i was using 10.2 and 256MB of ram at the time.

      ketamine

    97. Re:These look great! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Of course; there's little point in making a "router" if you're making linux (or unix) systems. Any unix-like system can handle routing and general gateway tasks.

      And it's true that RedHat's systems aren't really any better (or worse) than any other linux distro at such tasks. The point was that, since RedHat is supplying the OS for these laptops, they are in a good position to supply the infrastructure for internet connectivity. If you're ordering 500 laptops, and figure that you need 7 gateway boxes, the easy thing could be to just call your RedHat rep and place an order for all the stuff you think you need. The rep will probably be happy to discuss your setup and suggest additional stuff you might want.

      Of course, this won't always work. But the "foot in the door" approach is an old one, and should work as well here as anywhere.

      How lucrative this will be for RedHat isn't obvious. We're talking about doing business with some very poor people. It's likely that other vendors weren't particularly interested. Perhaps we should be commending RedHat for tackling a task that could be a lot of work with little financial payoff. Just the satisfaction of helping a lot of poor kids.

      Or maybe, in a decade or two, it'll pay off and RedHat will be the preferred computer vendor for the poorer half of the world, with some of the first batch of kids working for them. Sort of the Grameen Bank of computing.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    98. Re:These look great! by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no artificial restrictions on anything. Coming pre-installed with MacOS doesn't preclude anybody from doing anything they want - especially if they're the really highly technically minded people you're suggesting should be the beneficiaries of this.

      I don't think you understand what they are trying to do... here are these people with no computers at all, no way to IM or email people, no word processors, no way to look up information on the internet... and you're going to complain that what they're getting doesn't allow them to "tinker" with the OS?

      Most PCs come with windows, there seems to be an awful lot of people using Linux on them. If people are REALLY interested in doing that with these laptops, more power to them. I'd prefer to see the 99.999% of them that just want to send email and communicate with the rest of the world be happy then to "artificially" restrict those laptops because it didn't include an OS that they could look at the source of.

      It's a moot point, they're using Linux, but the offering of OSX was as generous as it could be.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    99. Re:These look great! by demachina · · Score: 1

      Education isn't the answer. Most of the people involved in corruption in the U.S. are extremely well educated, lawyers in particular, and they know perfectly well what is right and what is not. They no doubt had plenty of ethics classes.

      Either you choose to have an ethical compass or you don't. The simple fact is corruption usually pays extremely well if you don't get caught. Most people don't go in to politics for the high pay because there isn't any. They go in for the power and the ability to do favors for their friends and to reap benefits for themselves. Most politicians are operating on an ethical razor's edge. Is what they are doing legitimate and just doling out pork to their constituents or does it cross the line in to corruption?

      In Africa and Latin America economic opportunity is very limited so corruption becomes an appealing, or maybe the only, avenue to just make a living so it becomes very pervasive. There isn't much education will do to solve it unless it evolves in to economic opportunity through more legitimate avenues. Unfortunately most successful businessmen are also operating on an ethical edge. You can succeed in business operating ethically but its a LOT easier to profit through corruption and by taking advantage of those around you.

      --
      @de_machina
    100. Re:These look great! by deblau · · Score: 1
      Well, a lot of problems can be traced back to lack of education. The solution to AIDS is obvious.

      In Kwazulu-Natal province, South Africa, up to 40% of mothers giving birth have AIDS. Link. Education won't help them. Most AIDS babies die before they reach 5 years old. Education won't help them either. About 10% of babies develop AIDS from their mother while in the womb, another 20% during birth, and another 15% from breastfeeding. Link. Most third-world mothers can't afford to be on antiretroviral medication through her pregnancy. The biggest reduction comes from peri-natal treatment, where a $4 pill (nevirapine) can cut AIDS transmission from mother to child in half.

      Education costs a lot of money, and its effect on preventing HIV/AIDS depends ultimately on a decision each educated person will voluntarily make. Most likely with a naked person in front of them. On the other hand, you've got a 50% shot at saving a life outright by spending $4.

      Of course, as you point out, all of this is academic if the medicine/computers can't get to the children. Spend a few billion dollars to topple the corrupt governments first. If the US government had spent half of what they did in Iraq fighting African corruption and bringing in medicine and food, thousands of lives would have been saved rather than lost.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    101. Re:These look great! by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      It is, this guy's smoking something. I'm happy it's Linux, but if Jobs offered a scaled down OSX that would work on this thing, I'd think that was fantastic, too.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    102. Re:These look great! by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      It's certainly an interesting experiment, and laudable for an attempt to address the causes of poverty and inequity rather than treating the symptoms.

    103. Re:These look great! by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      but to some kids who now have word processors, spreadsheets, the ability to send and receive email and chat and so forth, it would be absolutely fanstasti
      But GNU/Linux gives you that on this laptop. However, the GP's point was that OS X wouldn't.

      Mac OS X barely runs in 128Mb of RAM. I last tried running it when it was Jaguar, and it booted, but woe-betide you if you wanted to run anything. Jaguar also needed 3G of disk space, plus enough space to store swap. It's not going to live in half a gig of Flash.

      The hardware requirements of Mac OS X meant it's a useless operating system for a $100 laptop. And the fact that it wasn't open source also undermined the entire reason for creating the things in the first place. Sorry to add some realism here people, I know a "We must bash the OSS zealots because they're all ideological and unwilling to select the best system, which is Mac OS X because it's from Teh Steve!!!1!" mentality exists amongst many Slashdotters, but your misguided and impractical "practicalism" and pro-Apple ideology is more ridiculous than normal.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    104. Re:These look great! by John+Newman · · Score: 1
      i've been using mac's from '89 (on a lowly black-and-white powerbook) till now (with the iMac FP) and macos X is simply slow on iMac FP (which is running G4 800MHz). I've seen OSX running in G5 and core duo and it's good. but on anything slower than iMac FP (G4 800) i don't think it's reasonable speed. btw my imac fp is running os9...
      Until last month my main development machine was a 600 MHz G3 iBook (grad school == poverty). Slow? Sure. Usable? Definitely. It's now in my gf's hands running 10.4 happily enough. Dashboard even still has all those cool rippley effects. When I first got the iBook, it had 10.2 and 128 MB of RAM: slow, sure; usable, definitely. And I know folks running 10.2/3 literally on 400 MHz iMacs. It works fine. I think it's just absurd to consider an 800 MHz G4 too underpowered to run OS X at all. Now, I wouldn't willingly go back to my iBook, but speed is very subjective - we tend to consider things "unusuable" once we're used to better, forgetting that we used them just fine for many years.

      And OS X isn't the major problem with limited RAM - it's trying to run Word, Excel, iPhoto, Photoshop, etc., and trying to run them all simultaneously. Even then, OS X does a respectable job with enough free drive space for volumnous scratch. OS X, together with lighweight apps, could run "good enough" on a 400 MHZ G3 (or equivalent) with 128 MB RAM. After all, the white iBooks debuted at 500 MHz with 64 MB of RAM shortly after 10.0 shipped.

      But a customized Linux install will run much, much better.

      [Is OS9 *really* still your day-to-day environment on that iMac? Almost all of the staple apps are out of development, save good ol' iCab. I'm really curious how a little more "snappiness" in the Finder trumps the stability and app availability of OS X...]
    105. Re:These look great! by skarphace · · Score: 1
      no, if a kid learns how to hack a kernel, it would help *your* community Linux does not make parched sahel more productive, will not fetch clean water and will probably not ward off infectious diseases (okay maybe it's less prone to viruses).
      Just now got to my messages...

      It would help *their* community as well. As a sibling post mentioned, once the 'weird foreigners' leave, they can't provide much support. So if you even get a couple kernel hackers out of it, they can do translations, maintenance, and support for their community. This in turn will give them the ability to look up information on agriculter and health and what-not for a long time come. You seriously think Microsoft/Apple would support them after the 1year mark?
      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
  3. Freedom where art thou? by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    You can see the photo album, and you can pledge to buy one at triple price... in order to donate 2 of them to children.

    Can I just one buy one at the regular price without being discriminated against (see price discrimination). Forced charity is no charity at all.

    --
    Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    1. Re:Freedom where art thou? by necro81 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Consider it computing using a sliding price scale - just like many medical care centers use. The people with great insurance or who pay in full outright, because they have the means to do so, effectively subsidize the care for those who can't pay as much, or anything.

    2. Re:Freedom where art thou? by fatphil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RTFA:
      """
      The suggestion has been made that he also offer it for sale for ~$300 to the rest of us so that we do have an interesting macnine and can help to support the cost computers for the developing world.
      """

      What bit of "also" do you not understand?

      FatPhil

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    3. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And if they do intend to engage in price discrimination, I hope they have found a way to prevent arbitrage, or else people may make businesses out of buying them at $100 and selling them at ~$200 in the countries where the negative price discrimination policy is in effect.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    4. Re:Freedom where art thou? by benjjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How is it forced charity? Forced charity would be if we were paying taxes for third world orphans to get gov't-funded laptops.

      This is just like being nice and giving to public radio, and they give you a sweet tote bag in return. Here, you're paying $300 to charity, as a nice, charitable human being, and you're getting a laptop in return.

      Don't be so whiney.

    5. Re:Freedom where art thou? by FroBugg · · Score: 1

      The problem is that, while they're making it as inexpensive as possible, it probably still costs more than $100 to make. I don't know this for sure, but I imagine some of the hardware manufacturers are offering special discounts specifically for its purpose as a charity device. If you were to just walk up and try to buy one, you'd then be demanding to benefit from their charity.

    6. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Bitter+Cup+O+Joe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wah! I live in a developed country and I don't want to pay more than someone in a developing country for something I want! Why should I subsidize something for poor people!

      Tell you what. Why don't you move to Africa with no money or resources, try to find work or an education, with little food, little to no medical care, the constant threat of violence, an unstable government, while relying on the kindness of strangers to even have a stab at making a decent life for yourself?

      Then we'll let you pay $100 for a laptop. Hey, maybe someone will even pay $300 to buy one for themself, and you can get one for free!

      Until then, STFU and pay $300 for the privilege of owning a toy you'll probably barely use.

      --
      "This is your world. These are your people. You can live for yourself today, or help build tomorrow for everyone."
    7. Re:Freedom where art thou? by arivanov · · Score: 0, Troll

      I know that I will be moderated into the ground for this post, but here it comes anyway. Where I can donate so that the children get a decent properly educated teacher and some new high quality schoolbooks instead of this?

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    8. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if they do intend to engage in price discrimination, I hope they have found a way to prevent arbitrage, or else people may make businesses out of buying them at $100 and selling them at ~$200...

      Yeah, the free market is a bitch like that.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    9. Re:Freedom where art thou? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Well, the fact that they don't intend to sell them to the public at all should counter most of your worries. This pledge drive is intending to get them to change that. However, given that pledges are currently coming in from people like "I. P. Freely", I guess it'll probably get ignored.

      It's all in TFA, if you'd cared to R it.

      FatPhil

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    10. Re:Freedom where art thou? by MindStalker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you even read the pledge to buy one page??

      It specifically stated that it was not associated with the MIT project and that infact that MIT has specifically stated that they cannot garantee that this is even possible. BUT it was implied that given a large enough order it may be. So some guy setup a website to see if he can meet a goal of 100,000 pledges in hope that MIT will agree.

    11. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's also price discrimination; it only works because you can't easily resell medical care.

      Otherwise, I'd find some bum on the street, pay him fifty bucks to go into the medical center and get my "care," then buy it off of him for less than I'd actually pay.

      There's a reason you don't see too many 'sliding scales' used for physical goods: it's too easy to turn around and resell them. Really, you can only vary the prices by less than it would cost to transport the good to an area where prices are higher. (Unless you have some artificial scheme for preventing the movement of goods, i.e. DVD region codes.) Otherwise, it doesn't take Adam Smith to figure out that people will just ship the low-priced goods to the areas where they sell for more, undercut the "official" channel, and make a profit.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    12. Re:Freedom where art thou? by jandrese · · Score: 1
      If it's any consolation, you can't buy one at any price. Here's the text on the pledge page:
      Note: The Media project is specifically NOT offering this for sale, and though I disagree with this position and hope that this pledge may show them that there are enough people who might be interesting in supporting this project, I felt that I should post their position:
      The comments below it just reinforce the "not availble for sale" position. You're basically just signing an internet petition with that page. Personally, I think it'd be a good idea even though I'm sure the Media project seriously doesn't want to do tech support for 100,000 doners.
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    13. Re:Freedom where art thou? by 10Ghz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, you might have had a tough life, but you are still an ass. And no, having a tough life is not an excuse for being an asshole. You are just pissed because people in third-world countris can have this laptop for 100 bucks, whereas you have to pay $300. Well, cry me a river. Don't like the price? Then don't buy it and stop your whining.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    14. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      These are textbooks...

    15. Re:Freedom where art thou? by DaPoulpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure you'll find *plenty* of organizations that are in need of money to handle this kind of aid, if you just try to google for it..
      This is just a new interesting attempt in another direction, if you don't support it feel free to contribute for something else.

    16. Re:Freedom where art thou? by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      We don't have that either, so why should they get it?

    17. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1

      They intend to sell them in "developing" countries, or distribute them through some sort of method, no? If they are not sold in "developed" countries, or are sold in developed countries at an inflated, discriminatory price, the incentive is created for people in the "developing" countries to sell their laptops to people in the "developed" countries. Basic economics. Unless that was the intent of the project, it would be advisable that the laptops are sold at a similar price everywhere to discourage arbitrage. And yes, I did "RTFA," to the extend that the "A" can be referred to as such.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    18. Re:Freedom where art thou? by famebait · · Score: 1

      Forced charity is no charity at all.

      Umm, I think you're missing what the goal here is. The point is getting these laptops into the hands of poor kids. Selling them to you for $100 won't help that. Using them as bait for donations might. Whether the latter qualifies as charity or not in your or anyone else's opinion doesn't even enter the equation.

      If you need that "true charity" kick so bad, just donate some cash and don't order the box.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    19. Re:Freedom where art thou? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      It depends on the country. In the United States you might want to donate to a private school in your county. In other countries in which education is more respected and the teachers unions are not as well entrenched, donating to the public school system is usually allowable.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    20. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Fhqwhgadss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oxfam does this. But if you actually gave a shit you'd know this already instead of blindly bashing the $100 laptop project. After all there's more than one way to try to help others and nobody is forcing you to do it their way.

      --
      How does a 7-person democracy cut a pie? Into 4 pieces.
    21. Re:Freedom where art thou? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      It isn't just about charity. They plan for the laptops to cost $100 each over time, but I am sure they will be muce more expensive to manufacture at first. They are only selling them for $300 if they get 100,000 other people to do it as well. I assume that unless that many people sign up the cost of selling them will be too high even at $300 each. I think they are using this to get the project off the ground.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    22. Re:Freedom where art thou? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Dear bonehead,

      The group producing these is producing them for charity. Not so you can get a cheap PC. It's not a corporation with servicing you as a customer in mind. It's a charity trying to provide things for less fortunate people who need them.

      Why don't you try going down to your local soup kitchen and tell them you want to buy a meal, but they better only charge you want it costs to make the food, because you don't want to have to donate to the other folks standing in line. See what kind of reception you get.

    23. Re:Freedom where art thou? by linvir · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you really gave a shit, you'd already know where, and would have donated. But you don't, you're just trying to score points, literally. 'I bet you'll mod me down' is weak reverse psychology but we all know how well it works here.

      Addressing your point, however, how do you expect kids to learn about IT without access to computers?

    24. Re:Freedom where art thou? by famebait · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These boxes aren't exactly powerhouses. In an industrialsed country with a normal second hand market for computers, this box is probably not the best way to spend your $200.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    25. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      After you left the US, where did you move to?

    26. Re:Freedom where art thou? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Yeah...a valid point, except I would think that as soon as the device is mass-marketed to places other than 3rd. world countries, the manufacturers supplying the parts for it would have to quit selling below cost as a charitable tax write-off. It simply would cease to be accurate.

      I'm not so sure this is really what's happening with these machines. Perhaps they're just being sold at *very* little mark-up though? If you think about it, in mass quantities, these really could cost just under $100 each to put together. Nobody's paying much for labor these days if they outsource the work to the right locations. The injection-molded plastic cases are dirt cheap too, other than the initial cost of having the mold itself produced. They're really skimping on the LCD screen display compared to most notebooks on the market, and that's gotta cut costs too. Apparently, that "chicklet" type keyboard is a less expensive alternative too. Of course, there's no licensing fee on the OS and software either. And with the growing popularity of integrated chipsets on motherboards, practically everything else it does (wi-fi, sound, etc.) could all be done with a motherboard that ends up maybe $25 at cost, in sufficient quantity.

    27. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a fine sentiment expressed by someone who calls himself "Distinguished Hero".
      Would you feel better if they sold them for $300 and donated 2 computers for every 1 sold?
      ...and as others have already pointed out, the "pledge 3, get 1" plan has nothing to do with MIT.

    28. Re:Freedom where art thou? by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Well, the thing is that it isn't charity, forced or not. It would simply be the pruchase of a product. What the company did with their profits would be their business. If they turn around and use their profits to donate 2 machines to poor kids is forign countries, so be it. Nobody is holding a gun to the purchasers headand saying "buy this under our terms, right NOW, or we put a slug in your brainpan." You want one of their laptops, you pay their price. Just like any purchase. First, you would have to convince them to sell them. As far as i saw the reference was sombody offering to buy one for $300, and someone else commenting they needed more people like him. No real offer for a box to be sold.

    29. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I love how I got modded as Flamebait repeatedly for making a coherent argument and responding to provocation, whereas you, who initiated the whole matter get modded up as Insightful for calling me an ass.

      And no, having a tough life is not an excuse for being an asshole.
      The whole field of sociology disagrees with you on that one. If I am an ass, I am so because of my socio-economic background, and that is hardly my fault.

      You are just pissed because people in third-world countris can have this laptop for 100 bucks, whereas you have to pay $300.
      I'm pissed because I have read enough economic books to know about price discrimination and the problems that come with it e.g. how certain steps like preventing arbitrage have to be taken if you want to be a successful price discriminator.

      Don't like the price? Then don't buy it and stop your whining.
      Or I can not buy it and continue to express my opinion while being repeatedly modded down by slashbots.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    30. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Idou · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "a decent properly educated teacher and some new high quality schoolbooks"

      Sorry to break it to you, but in most countries $100 per student will not provide the above, nor even come close. So if you are willing to donate significantly more than $100, then by all means please do and perhaps you will be able to make a lasting impact on one student`s life.

      However, if you only have $100 to donate, this laptop probably will have the largest impact on a child`s life. I personally like to get the biggest bang for my buck, so I will be donating to this project, even if I do end up donating more than $100 (so that my money is able to help more than one child).

      Cheers.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    31. Re:Freedom where art thou? by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I know you're really trolling, but http://charitynavigator.org/ is what I use for picking the best "bang for your buck" organizations. You can easily compare groups & see who has the lowest overhead costs etc.

    32. Re:Freedom where art thou? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      It's called a Ponzi scheme. 100K people sign up and 10K get the laptops that 100K of people paid for.

      Then another 100K sign up and the next 10K get theirs.

      Until they can turn over 1-1 order to deliveries it's nothing more than a scam.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    33. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I can donate so that the children get a decent properly educated teacher and some new high quality schoolbooks instead of this?

      This is an initative put forth from The Massachusetts Institute of Technology

      You'd think it would be ok for MIT to use its own field of expertise to help out less fortunate children. Every time something like this pops up, some self rightous asshole gets mod points for yapping that philanthropist in question doesn't have its priorities in order.

      How about you give your money for basic necessities to Sally Struthers and the bald headed bearded guy, and leave the tech stuff to people like the folks at MIT.

    34. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Kalak · · Score: 1

      If you think the Insurance companies pay full rate, you need to look closer at some itemized statements. They frequently get a cheaper rate, and it's not a sliding scale for them, it's a "buy in bulk" logic.

      To keep this on topic, I think schools and kids with a specific need should get the $100 rate - I'm looking at one for my speech aparaxic 7 year old, who would break a normal laptop, but this may just be perfect to go with pVoice http://www.pvoice.org/ and survive in her hands. I'm not interested in receiving charity for it, but this could provide a revolution in assistive technology or kids.

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    35. Re:Freedom where art thou? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      I'm sure the Media project seriously doesn't want to do tech support for 100,000 doners.

      Then they should have used Ubuntu. I am sure Mark Shuttleworth would be more than happy to have 100000 potential customers for Canonical's support services.

    36. Re:Freedom where art thou? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Geez, arn't you the negative one. You are only pledging to buy one not handing the money over now.

    37. Re:Freedom where art thou? by linvir · · Score: 1
      The whole field of sociology disagrees with you on that one. If I am an ass, I am so because of my socio-economic background, and that is hardly my fault.
      The several billion people from around the world who manage to avoid being asses in spite of their socioeconomic background might take exception to that statement.

      It's not an excuse, but it might be a factor. Personally though, I'm against the practice of judging an entire person's worth as a human based on one comment on one subject, so I'm staying out of that bit.

    38. Re:Freedom where art thou? by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Now hang on a minute! I think at some point, after these things are released to the open public, there will probably be ample opportunity to buy these at "regular" prices, but keep in mind the original intent.

      Further, I am not at ALL against spending the $300 so long as it's made tax deductible. I think that would be pretty nice. Has there been any word on whether on not it would be considered a charitable donation by the IRS? What are the rules?

    39. Re:Freedom where art thou? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      That's why this project it so moronic.

      Instead of laptops they should be building kiosks. The costs would be lower (no high-tech batteries or space constraints), and they could design them such that you could pour 800lbs of concrete into the base when you got them to their final destination.

    40. Re:Freedom where art thou? by tclgeek · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. $100 won't buy a whole heckuva lot of schoolbooks. Imagine, though, a $100 laptop that can download all the content of as many schoolbooks as they want. I think the laptop is better than $100 of your high quality textbooks in this regard. The laptop gives them access to way more data than a handful of schoolbooks.

    41. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Garabito · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Where I can donate so that the children get a decent properly educated teacher and some new high quality schoolbooks instead of this?

      You're right, books are important. Those $100 should be used to buy books for schools in developing countries, instead of buying useless gadgets for them.

      Hey, I have an idea! Instead of buying paper books, it would be better if we spend that money on e-books, so they can get new and updated books every school year, at almost no cost. But in order to do that we would need an e-book reading device...

      I hope someone came up with such a device...

      Oh wait...

    42. Re:Freedom where art thou? by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Firstly, there is no real effort to sell to individuals, so there is an arbitrage limiting mechanism right there. Secondly, price discrimination, as defined in the Wikipedia article you reference, is not a bad thing in many situations. This is one of them if they were to sell to individuals. Thirdly, if someone in Africa or India, or a South Pacific island were willing to sell and ship their $100 laptop to a rich Western European or American for $200, more power to them. Eventually the demand from the rich for a toy would be satisfied, and the poor could afford an educational tool and a years worth of food from their arbitrage transaction. (Baring inflation due to supply/demand imbalances along with the income influx)

    43. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      What the company did with their profits would be their business.


      It depends. Are they classified as a non-profit in the US?
    44. Re:Freedom where art thou? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      Some people are going to donate them for charity whatever price scheme you use. So if it's donated, whether it's "worth" $100 or $300 on the black market, there is a chance someone will sell it rather than use it. Should people never donate then?

    45. Re:Freedom where art thou? by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Using logic against trolls never works. ;) You need big hammers. Sor of like the one you have, right there.

    46. Re:Freedom where art thou? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      No, I'm a realist. As much as I value access to information and technology I think this is nothing more than wishful thinking. The fact that they are planning on taking money yet is just inappropriate.

      Until they can make 100K units and deliver them for $100 each they should be charging more. At least if you paid 150$ for your "$100 laptop" but actually got it on time you could say "I'm supporting the cause". When they rely on your goodwill [to put up with "shipping delays" a/k/a/ future orders] to pay for it, it's just a scam.

      Besides, I'd rather see computers in the class that can be more than a pretty looking fisher price toy.

      I grew up with 1 Apple ][ in the classroom. We had assigned "computer time". Then we moved to the MacSE, MacII, etc, etc. We never had one laptop per student. Yet we grew up just fine and are doing wonderful things with technology.

      Why not just plomp down an AMD PIC or two per classroom and use the same time sharing process? That'd not only be cheaper, but it could ACTUALLY BE DONE TODAY!!!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    47. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Price discrimination happens all the time. It's a good thing in a competitive market. It allows goods to be cheaper for thsoe people who need them to be cheaper. After all, if the laptop is worth $300 to you, you'll pay it. Nevermind the fact that somebody else is buying millions of laptops and paying $120[1] for them.

      [1] or whatever Negroponte[2] is quoting as the current price.
      [2] Blackbridge is a weird name.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    48. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Kismet · · Score: 1

      Hi there.

      What is a "properly" educated teacher?

      By the way, project Gutenberg hosts a good portion of the world's classic literature online. Why settle for "schoolbooks" when you can read the original works of Newton, Darwin, Hobbes, et al.?

    49. Re:Freedom where art thou? by vtcodger · · Score: 1
      Your point, I'm sure, is that there are things schools in developing countries need a lot more than computers. I agree with you actually, and I wouldn't limit that to developing countries.

      But the first few computers in a school really will have a positive effect. Probably a $100 laptop or three will make it easier for teachers to create and print teaching materials, and will help with grading, and attendance and bizarre mandatory paperwork which I suspect is not a phenomenon unique to the developed world. There will be some other beneficial uses.

      The idea of giving every kid in any K-12 school -- developed country or not -- a computer, strikes me as being somewhere between wierd and demented. But a few cheap computers in each of a million or so schools that now don't have enough of them will probably do some good.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    50. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 0

      The several billion people from around the world who manage to avoid being asses in spite of their socioeconomic background might take exception to that statement.
      Hehe. That comment of mine was actually a jab at sociologists and the deterministic view they take. :)

      Personally though, I'm against the practice of judging an entire person's worth as a human based on one comment on one subject, so I'm staying out of that bit.
      Nice to meet you. People of your caliber seem rather rare nowadays (though I'm not sure if I should be making that assessment based only on one comment of yours on one subject).
      Cheers.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    51. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How can a topical, point by point rebuttal of a post currently modded +4, Insightful be modded down all the way to -1, Offtopic? The hypocrisy of the average Slashdot moderator is astounding. Come on, mod this down as well, prove me right! May you all rot in meta-moderation hell (or purgatory, as the case may be).

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    52. Re:Freedom where art thou? by david.given · · Score: 1
      And if they do intend to engage in price discrimination, I hope they have found a way to prevent arbitrage, or else people may make businesses out of buying them at $100 and selling them at ~$200 in the countries where the negative price discrimination policy is in effect.

      I'd heard that they were planning to make them in two colours; one colour for the donated machines, and another for the commercially sold ones. The idea was to make it very obvious that you were using a resold donated machine.

      Unfortunately, I have no references for this.

    53. Re:Freedom where art thou? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      The $200 portion of that price likely would be (deducting the cost of the laptop you get). This similar to joining organizations like AOPA (Airplane Owners and Pilots Association), EAA (Experimental Aviation Association), or the NRA. You can kinda see my interests from that list :). Anyways, the membership to most of these is tax deductible, but since you get a magazine subscription when joining, you can't deduct a portion of the membership of the considered value of the magazine subscription (which is usually set to $25). So if it's $40 per year, only $15 of that is tax deductible.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    54. Re:Freedom where art thou? by arivanov · · Score: 1
      Imagine, though, a $100 laptop that can download all the content of as many schoolbooks as they want.

      Really?

      Have you asked the authors and the publishers about this? They will immediately disagree with you (or their shareholders will).

      There is no point in donating to this program without donating to a program for putting a full curriculum worth of textbook material into the public domain first.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    55. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Rhett's+Dad · · Score: 1
      Why not just plomp down an AMD PIC or two per classroom and use the same time sharing process?

      Given that I unfortunately doubt there will millions of orders that translate into 2Xmillions of donated laptops, I imagine the donated units will have to be divied out such that there will indeed only be one or two per classroom.

      I suppose if we really enjoy debating the pros/cons of any/all methods of helping, we could form several executive committees and pick up several sets of poor corporate executives that are currently being paid below the $1M line. Would that be more productive?

      Given that the pledge website appears to have been /.'ed right now, it may end up that our enjoyable debating has indeed put the brakes on the effort.
      --
      Let me introduce you to my very own DMCA-protected encryption key: BC 1B 64 4A 8D DE 49 E8 C3 7D CC EE 1A AD EE
    56. Re:Freedom where art thou? by QMO · · Score: 1

      1. Your post seems to suggest that "discrimination" is inherently bad. It is not.

      2. This is not forced. I'm not buying one, for example.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    57. Re:Freedom where art thou? by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      try to find work or an education, with little food, little to no medical care, the constant threat of violence, an unstable government, while relying on the kindness of strangers to even have a stab at making a decent life for yourself?

      No thanks, I've already been to Detroit.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    58. Re:Freedom where art thou? by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Ok. You got me there. If they are a 501(c)(3) chartered entity they do have to disclose in their charter how their funding is to be spent, in general terms. That said, there is a hell of a lot of leeway in the writing of the charter and in the execution. Besides, in the context of my original statement, if what they want to do is be a 501(c)(3) that donates hardware purchased from the profits of their other sales and donate it to underprivileged children and schools in other countries, then that's their business (litteraly0, and I'll purchase the laptop, or not. For me it still isn't charity, it's a purchase.

    59. Re:Freedom where art thou? by hackus · · Score: 1

      Actually, if everyone had free access or a terminal of some sort to information, they could probably fix most of thier problems themselves.

      Problem is, Intellectual Property was created to insure the havs get information and the hav nots cannot use information.

      Allowing people to tap into the global internet and get access to other view points, how things are and asking others for help or consultation is one way to destroy totalitarianism, corrupt governments and greedy corrupt corporations.

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    60. Re:Freedom where art thou? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Err...

      Now find a teacher who will agree to teach directly on that material. Or students capable of assimilating that material especially in unabridged ole English. Same for the entire curriculum 1st to last year of school and all subjects please.

      On a more realistic note.

      Education requires curriculum. For the moment there is no free curriculum in English or any other language which a teacher can make use of on these laptops. There is no curriculum planned either.

      In addition to that it must be free as in speach, not in beer because different countries have to modify it to suit their needs including possible translation into local language. Anybody donating to that in the context of the 100$ laptop program?

      Even once the curicullum has been compiled, teachers need to be trained, educated and kept up to date with changes to it. That is what I mean by "properly educated teacher". They do not grow on trees. They cost money. Anybody donating to that in the context of the 100$ laptop program?

      Whatever we do, the laptop will not replace at least some of the didactic material necessary to teach. Once again anybody donating to that in the context of the 100$ laptop program?

      So frankly, for the time being it is one big technologist bullshit utopia which will achieve a fraction of what can be achieved for the same amount of money.

      I am happy that my original post made some people put actual pointers to other charities. Many of them are a better use for the money. Disclaimer: personally, I give directly to one or two places I know need it. No talebanoevangelical or other good-willing utopia BS middlemen involved.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    61. Re:Freedom where art thou? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      My emphasis should have been more on "public", sorry. Deals with governments to supply things to schools, isn't public in the same way that you and I buying stuff from cdbaby is.

      I'm not sure how they (anyone) expects to stop these things being stolen more than copper and aluminium cable are. And if they do have a value in the developed world, then the black market trade in them could be quite horrendous.

      FatPhil

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    62. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      Why not just plomp down an AMD PIC or two per classroom and use the same time sharing process? That'd not only be cheaper, but it could ACTUALLY BE DONE TODAY!!!

      Is there someone stopping you from doing this?

      And btw, they aren't taking any money right now. Hell, this pledging deal is just to try and convince the people in charge to allow people to buy one for $300.

      I know how it is, I'm a very skeptical person myself, but saying they are trying to scam money is just wrong.

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    63. Re:Freedom where art thou? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      "Is there someone stopping you from doing this? "

      I hate that line of thinking.

      I'm a person, an individual. It's not up to me to ensure that entire continents of people have access to technology. If these countries just stopped the wholesale genocide and other wars going on they could collect their thoughts, educate their people and grow the fuck up.

      For my school to get those Apple ][ I was talking about they had likely to raise taxes. The *COMMUNITY* paid for it so that the generation growing up would have access to technology.

      Face it, we're not going to make the world a better place tomorrow. It'll take generations before technology and a stable economy develop.

      Dropping cheap, defective $100 laptops on a 3rd nation where the most schooling the average person has goes to GRADE THREE won't make their lives better.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    64. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Radar+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Why not just plomp down an AMD PIC or two per classroom and use the same time sharing process? That'd not only be cheaper, but it could ACTUALLY BE DONE TODAY!!!

      Yeah, but try hand cranking it! One of the "selling" points is independence from a quite possibly non-existent or at best unreliable electrical supply.

    65. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I respectfully (or not ;) ) disagree.

      If you dropped a boatload of these on a country where the average education was third grade, then I expect that many of the people who want to use these would wind up educating themselves somewhat just by using them - it would be a good tool to help them learn to read/write at a basic level, and the motiviation would be the new cool stuff they could do.

      Even if there wasn't formal education coming out of it, the informal education of curiousity learning would be HUGE.

    66. Re:Freedom where art thou? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      And I disagree. If you can't read you can't use a computer. And you need formal education otherwise you end up with generation of functionally incompetent people.

      Do you want Engrish, Babu [Indian] and now whatever you call African Enlishese?

      I want kids of the world to have a fighting chance at life. I want them to be educated. And yes, access to technology will expedite and facilitate the process. But that means access to technology that is stable, performs enough to be realistic and is available responsibly today.

      Sure [for instance] my initial education with computers was informal hacking, I still went to college and got a solid foundation. So when I talk about a compiler, I know more than "you hit F9 and turbo pascal makes an EXE".

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    67. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Bitter+Cup+O+Joe · · Score: 1

      So, wait, wait, let me get this straight. You came out of a third-world hellhole, you know how bad things are there, and you still want cheap consumer goods at the expense of people still in a third world hellhole?

      Wow. Just wow. I should have about twelve thousand snarky comments to make about you at this point, but you pretty much just made it so that I don't have to say a single one. Anything I say on the matter of your avarice, arrogance and lack of empathy is going to seem redundant.

      The arbitrage thing is a good point, tho. Or it would be if, you know, shipping and price of business costs wouldn't make the margins on the arbitrage you described so infintessimally small that it would be a complete waste of time for anyone that wanted to try it, particularly selling back to a first world nation where a better used laptop is available for $200.

      --
      "This is your world. These are your people. You can live for yourself today, or help build tomorrow for everyone."
    68. Re:Freedom where art thou? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      That's my point.

      Oh great, you learned to use a computer [the money I may add, could have bought another clean well or food for a year]. Now you finish school and ... what? use a hand crank computer in industry?

      The infrastructure is not in place then what's the fucking point? We had roads, sewers, power, etc, long before we had computers [in the schools/homes] in North America.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    69. Re:Freedom where art thou? by LegendLength · · Score: 1

      That's why this project it so moronic.

      In the end it is going to be the same poor 3rd world kid getting that extra $200 from the ebay sale, rather than his keeping his laptop. I realise the money would not carry the same intended educational benefit, but the money from the sale will surely add some good to the kid's life. I do agree though in principle that price discrimination is a bad idea. I just think that in this case it doesn't do much actual harm.

    70. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Kismet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I laud your efforts to benefit our fellow human beings in the way you see fit. Certainly I have no criticism for you on that count.

      What you suggest, by way of your post, troubles me:

      1) Children must be taught, or compelled to learn
      2) Material must be dumbed down because children aren't capable of assimilating it in its original format.
      3) Teachers will only accept this abbreviated "curriculum," perhaps due to their own incapacity to teach directly from the masters, or because teachers must be mass-produced and don't have time for deep learning.
      4) Learning doesn't happen without a curriculum.

      The $100 laptop is merely a tool - one capable of providing access to the greatest library that the world has ever seen.

      I'm reminded of a story that Richard P. Feynman told, about how he used to check books out of the library when he was a boy. One day he brought a book about calculus to the librarian, with the intent of checking it out. He then related the criticism that he received from this librarian, who couldn't conceive how a book on calculus could possibly be useful or interesting to a mere boy. You remind me very much of that librarian. That a child should step out of the commitee-mandated curriculum and pursue advanced topics of interest is inconceivable!

      It may be that much important literature is written in language foreign to many people. The mind would necessarily need to be expanded in order to understand the principles of those great individuals who originally thought them. And what is wrong with that? You discount the power of human passion, once that desire to learn has been ignited. We have classics suitable for all types of people, and need only the right access to them. Instead of teachers, they need mentors to inspire them.

      I'm sure we can find a place for "school" somewhere. Unfortunately, most of us waste too much time in that pursuit for entirely economic reasons. When has school ever produced a master artist or statesman? Instead we make employees and complacent citizens.

      It may be that your ideals are realistic in our estimation - we live in a mass-produced utopia every day thanks to our state-mandated curriculum and business-sponsored systems of bureaucratic education. Having all found good jobs, we're now too busy to pursue our real interests (recreation makes us feel better about this sad loss), and certainly there is no time left for reading classics. Let's not export these chains to our neighbors who we wrongly consider less fortunate.

      If anything, access to the world's literature is a prize worth more than many a mediocre teacher.

      Just my opinion on the matter. As it is, the $100 laptop might end up becoming yet another way to export our Western excesses and vices (gambling, porno, etc), and not be used as a learning tool at all. I'm worried about it in that regard.

    71. Re:Freedom where art thou? by schlumpf_louise · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's just a marketing strategy. It's exactly the same as putting on sale some little pin badge for £1, and stating that 70p of it goes to charity.

      Ok so you haven't got the option to buy the pin for 30p, but even if 70p of it didn't go to charity, it would still probably sell for £1 and the profit would go to the people who produced it.

      If you don't want to pay $300 then don't, then you're not forced into charity. If you want the product then accept that the money goes somewhere good, they aren't just over charging for the fun of it.

    72. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Education requires curriculum.
      That turns out not to be the case.
    73. Re:Freedom where art thou? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      What about people who can only afford a $100 laptop?

    74. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Radar+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Use the skills you learn to get a job in the town that has such infrastructure? And what's wrong with using a hand cranked device if that's all there is?

      The things you mention pre-date computers by a considerable period, but doesn't make them a necessary precursor.

    75. Re:Freedom where art thou? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      so you outsource the production of "cheap laptops for the third world" to third-world sweatshops... interesting plan..

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    76. Re:Freedom where art thou? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      People sell off food stamps for as little as 10 cents on the dollar. Any average joe wishing to save some money can buy them, then spend them on whatever unprepared food you want. A good way to cut your grocery bill by half or more.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    77. Re:Freedom where art thou? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Yes. when the child's family needs some malaria medicine (or whatever) he will be expected to pawn off his laptop. The market will probably be flooded with them, so he may only get $20 for one. (which is a fair sum of money in many parts of Africa). Eventually it will trickle up through various fences until suddenly you find them on ebay for $200. The child gets $20 and the gray-area entrepreneurs get $170. and ebay gets $10.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    78. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with a hand-cranked computer? Do you simply dislike it because it seems like stone-age technology to you?

      One might as easily dismiss a mechanically-powered flashlight or radio.

      It's useful because it's portable and self-contained. And humans have a habit of finding uses for things, even if they don't seem to have an immediate use.

      In addition, computers in particular have a way of channeling curiosity in the developing mind. I started programming when I was in 1st grade, on one of those school-system Apple IIs. I don't see any reason why free access to a computer wouldn't help inspire the minds of similarly-educated children.

    79. Re:Freedom where art thou? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      You're a fucking tool. You can't compete in todays industry with hand-crank computers.

      Let's see... building 100K of source code probably takes thousands of Joules of energy. How much does say 50RPM on a hand crank generate?

      So you can't develop software on this [let alone store the software, I might add these have 512MB of storage].

      Ok, what about EE work? Let's try to run Synopsis on it. Ok that's dozens of thousands of Joules...

      Art? No.

      Media? No.

      Press? No.

      etc...

      You need AC current that has five nines of up time to be competitive. Not some toy that while effective in the class is TOTALLY FUCKING USELESS otherwise.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    80. Re:Freedom where art thou? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      I love how I got modded as Flamebait repeatedly for making a coherent argument and responding to provocation, whereas you, who initiated the whole matter get modded up as Insightful for calling me an ass.


      I did not "initiate" the whole matter. You were having a discussion with someone else, and I commented from the sidelines, that you are an ass. And I said that because you really are an ass.

      I'm pissed because I have read enough economic books to know about price discrimination and the problems that come with it e.g. how certain steps like preventing arbitrage have to be taken if you want to be a successful price discriminator.


      Well, the laptop is meant for children in the third-world, not some geeks in rich countries. So they are selling them to those third-world countries for $100 a piece. People in the "west" can also get one, but it will cost extra: $300. Idea propably is that if they were sold at same rice, then they would just be sold to the geeks in the west, and not to the people it's really meant for. If they ask the geeks for extra money, they would then have more money to spend on the laptops meant for the developing countries. But since their purpose is not to sell cheap gadgets to geeks, I fail to see why they should sell them here for $100.

      Are you pissed because there might be cases of someone who got it for $100 selling it for $200? I don't buy that for a second. You are just pissed because you want a cheap gadget, and you can't get one. And just because you had a crappy life when you were younger, you somehow feel that you are entitled to this particular gadget. Here's a news-flash for you: You aren't entitled to one damn thing! The fact that you used to live in some shithole does not mean that you are entitled to anything.

      How could they prevent arbitrage? Well, the $100 laptops would end up in third-world countries. They would then have to be shipped back to rich countries and sold there at a profit. I don't think that it's worth it in the end.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    81. Re:Freedom where art thou? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Figure out how much energy it takes to compile something like the Linux kernel in a competitive amount of time [say 10 minutes]. Now figure out how hard you have to work to generate that power in half the time [5 minutes].

      Enjoy.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    82. Re:Freedom where art thou? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      My scale may be off [re: thousands of joules] but I won't pretend to actually know how much power it takes... hehehehe.

      Point is, it's not trivial.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    83. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1

      You came out of a third-world hellhole
      Second-world hellhole actually.

      you still want cheap consumer goods at the expense of people still in a third world hellhole?
      How is it at their expense? I'm not asking that they pay for it in any way. I am merely asking that the same product be sold at the same price. These folks at MIT claim to have designed a laptop which they can and will sell for $100 (I assume they are not selling it bellow the cost of production as that would represent a failure to achieve their goals and may even be illegal depending on the country; see Predatory pricing). This is not a rhetorical question. I would be quite pleased if you could answer how anything I requested thus far is "at the expense of people still in a third world hellhole."

      As for the shipping and the cost of business providing a sufficient barrier to arbitrage, we shall see. You have your hypothesis, and I have mine; however, had I not presented you with mine, you would have almost certainly never come up with yours. You, in your opulence, claim that the profit would not be a sufficient motivator; we shall see my friend, we shall see.

      Anything I say on the matter of your avarice, arrogance and lack of empathy is going to seem redundant.
      Spare me your Judeo-Christian inspired emotional self-righteous belligerence. As for my avarice, and whatever other pejoratives and epithets you may feel the need to lavishly bestow upon me, it is sometimes those who have been deprived of food the longest who gorge themselves the most. Being a child of privilege, I would not expect you to be able to understand.

      Having had sufficient material wealth for the entire course of your existence, you instead desire emotional satisfaction, which you seem to believe you will attain through your self-righteous antagonism of those you deem your moral inferiors, although, who, due to the bonds of your opulence, you shall never be capable of comprehending.

      P.S. Don't forget to answer my question.
      P.P.S. I fully expect this post to be modded down to oblivion by your cohort and fellow travelers just as all my others have been thus far.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    84. Re:Freedom where art thou? by jpatters · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that by paying $300 for one, you are donating two of them to people in developing countries, so you would be paying $300 and getting a $200 tax deduction for the charitable donation. While the $200 deduction isn't usually worth $100, you would have to be a real Factory Wrapped Douche to buy one for $200 from an arbitrageur. It would not be something you could brag about in the same manor that you normally would brag about saving $100 by buying from a gray market. What you would have is a brightly colored laptop of shame.

      --
      "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
    85. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1

      I did not "initiate" the whole matter. You were having a discussion with someone else, and I commented from the sidelines
      Fair enough. Due to your conversational style and your use of the word "still" I mistakenly assumed you were the same chap I was conversing with before. I am man enough to admit when I am mistaken, so you have my apology on this matter.

      I commented from the sidelines, that you are an ass. And I said that because you really are an ass.
      There you go again. No respect for civil discourse, and yet, while my posts are almost instantaneously modded down into obscurity, yours are modded up to +5 for the whole world to appreciate and marvel at. Surely even you must admit that this is hardly fair, and points to an abuse of the moderation system. Surely even you must admit that I have never used any epithets or pejoratives and that I have conducted myself in a manner far more respectful than my opponents. Furthermore, even you must admit that while I have brought several important points to the discussion e.g. price discrimination, predatory pricing, and have supported my arguments with links, you have brought nothing to this discussion but hatred and bile. And yet, here we are; you at +5, and me at -1. Even you must admit that something seems amiss.

      People in the "west" can also get one, but it will cost extra: $300.
      Incorrect. Under the proposal, people in the west can still get one for $100/unit; however, they would be forced to buy them in groups of 3, and then forced to give up two units per group to charity.

      Idea propably is that if they were sold at same rice, then they would just be sold to the geeks in the west, and not to the people it's really meant for.
      If the computers were sold at the same price, why would they be more inclined to sell them outside of the "developing world"? They should have enough supply to meet all demand, especially as many people on this site claim that there is not much demand outside the "developing world" for a $100 computer, due to it being an inferior product (their claim, not mine).

      If they ask the geeks for extra money, they would then have more money to spend on the laptops meant for the developing countries.
      Incorrect. Reread the proposal and my posts.

      But since their purpose is not to sell cheap gadgets to geeks, I fail to see why they should sell them here for $100.
      I already covered this in great detail. Please reread my posts.

      Are you pissed because there might be cases of someone who got it for $100 selling it for $200?
      I'm not "pissed." I merely pointed out a well known problem with price discrimination.

      And just because you had a crappy life when you were younger, you somehow feel that you are entitled to this particular gadget.
      Entitlement culture is the West's gift to the world. I assure you that I have no feeling of entitlement whatsoever. I encourage you to reread my posts. The only reason why I even mentioned that I spent a huge chunk of my life living in piss-poor conditions relative the West was because some chap decided to launch a personal attack on me, and I felt the need to point out that he had selected the wrong method to go about it due to my personal history.

      They would then have to be shipped back to rich countries and sold there at a profit. I don't think that it's worth it in the end.
      To you, living in opulence, it would probably not be worth it. To others, however, it might very well be worth it. Never having been in the situation we are discussing, you are incapable of comprehending the lengths to which people are willing to go for what you would consider "little profit."

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    86. Re:Freedom where art thou? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I've written software on much less powerful systems. Including systems that ran off a pair of AAA cells. I'm pretty sure it would have been trivial for me to hand crank or pedal crank the system and still get reasonable results.

      So lets say your system draws 4 watts and you compile a reasonable software project in about 5 minutes. You'd have to put about 1000 J into the system to do that. While you're editing it might only draw a fraction of a watt (I would hope). You have to have a pretty miserly system to be hand crank and you'd be pretty tired too. That's like 200-300 calories in a 5 minute period, iirc.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    87. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      Well, the reason I said that was because not everyone is going to agree with each other. And if we wait for some unanimous agreement before action is taken, we aren't even going to get started. So, MIT has their ideas, and they're acting on theirs... You have your ideas, and what? It may take an entire community, or whatnot, but this process needs to be started by someone. But before you start taking man power away from MIT's idea, you should probably have something more than some idea you posted about on teh Slashdots. Or is your plan just to have someone else do all of the work and you critique it? Mine too.

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    88. Re:Freedom where art thou? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Um the power to run a system with enough ram + HD + network + screen + decent processor + inefficiencies is probably near 200W.

      A human biking as hard as they can generate 100W or so tops.

      Sure you can run a 20Mhz ARM processor off of AAA, but that same processor won't compile something the size of the Linux kernel in 15 minutes. Try more like 75 minutes. An Opteron processor takes even at idle over 30W of juice.

      Now multiply that by a couple dozen employees. Then factor in the time and salaries for that time period, etc.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    89. Re:Freedom where art thou? by s16le · · Score: 0
      Just so you know, I've been modding you down. You are correct about the hypocrisy, but you're still a whiny little dick and I'm getting a kick out of your tantrums.


      http://slashdot.org/~alfs+boner/

      :)

    90. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well here's a tip for that dude with the buy three idea. That's a fine idea, but an even faster and better way would be to just drop the charity angle and sell them to wealthy customers at the hundred dollar price for folks who want them for the low power consumption and the use of standard rechargeable batteries. That right there is a sweet little option for camping trips or road trips. A notebook that runs on standard C cells is a dream come true. I can get C cell NiHM right down the street here for a hell of a lot cheaper than the cheapest replacement notebook battery. That's a sweet selling point even without a hand crank. The hand crank would be cool too, but if I can just recharge a dozen C cells for a week of camping, that will work.
              I'd be interested at a hundred bucks. Add a 2.5inch external 80gig drive for another hundred and you've got a killer little movie machine/jukebox that's at least as good as the car DVD toys they sell at Best Buy for three hundred bucks. And you could download your photos to the thing while you're out in the wilderness. This thing is marketable big time. It's just not being marketed right. Call it the Happy Camper computer. Sell them to people going to Burning Man. Hell, get Wal Mart to carry it in the camping section. The charity thing is fine and good, but why not just sell them directly at the going price? That seems like a much faster way to rack up a hundred thousand sales. It's emminently marketable.
                How about a 12V adapter?
                Seems silly to have a decent product and then to assume the only way you can move it is with charity donations. Just sell the damn things.

    91. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Valar · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Yet more evidence that economics is like chemistry: while advice from someone with a lot of knowledge is far safer than no advice at all, advice from someone with a little knowledge is more dangerous than just applying common sense.

      Also, the most important lesson about economics, that many of my peers have yet to learn is that economics is not a theoretical thing or a force of its own. It exists in the real world. To confront _charity_ from a purely economic standpoint is misguided.

      Furthermore, if you really want to get into the economics of the thing, the real products they are making are not computers, but rather bundles of goodwill. They are giving you an opportunity to spend money to make yourself happier by making others happier. If knowing that you are helping someone you will probably never meet doesn't do anything for you, then you are looking for the wrong product. You should buy a laptop with similar specs on eBay. Just like how if you don't want to give $200 to help NPR or PBS, you go to walmart to get your tote bag instead.

    92. Re:Freedom where art thou? by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      The $300 idea is not coming from the MIT, which is the entity making the laptops! The people who had the $300 idea are not even sure that the MIT will agree... A possible reason for them not to agree would be shortage of stock to meet demand...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    93. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      There is no point in donating to this program without donating to a program for putting a full curriculum worth of textbook material into the public domain first.

      Luckily that sort of project is already underway. Sure, it is rather incomplete and patchy in its coverage, and the quality can be a little up and down, but there are actually a large number of pretty good quality texts on there for a wide variety of subjects. Wikijunior books, for instance, have material good enough for the kids the laptop project is aimed at.

      Jedidiah.

    94. Re:Freedom where art thou? by Tacky+the+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Otherwise, it doesn't take Adam Smith to figure out that people will just ship the low-priced goods to the areas where they sell for more, undercut the "official" channel, and make a profit.

      It already happens in the camera business. It's called the 'gray market'. Most manufacturs refuse to warranty or even repair (for cash) such cameras.

    95. Re:Freedom where art thou? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      As I think about it, it might really make sense for them to sell 10,000 or 20,000 laptops in the States and do the tech support just to root out the problems before they're deployed in the field. The last thing they need is to build a million laptops, send them to the remote corners of the earth, and then discover that the manufacturer cut corners on the LCD backlight causing them to fail at an unacceptable rate. Once it's in some village with no road in the middle of Africa, nobody is going to be able to do anything with it when it breaks.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    96. Re:Freedom where art thou? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It takes 4 hours to build a release at my work. 75 minutes is no big deal. I've done plenty on a 386 33Mhz, and in my opinion that's just a blazing fast machine. Also you can run 200Mhz ARM off a fraction of a watt (a single AAA easily for quite some time).

      if compiling time really mattered we wouldn't be running Windows and using gobs of C++ abstractions. I suspect nobody really cares, we just don't compile as often and try and read the source instead of frantically stabbing the build project button.

      1. I don't recommend using 20Mhz ARM (or even a 200Mhz ARM) with a flash drive to run your entire software department, programmers won't be willing to pedal their computers.

      2. your estimation of what it takes to develop software is pretty unreasonable.

      3. this entire discussion lacks any discernable purpose.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  4. Hand Powered? by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't understand something, these are supposed to be crank powered to solve the situation where there isn't any electricity. On the blog link, you can see the crank in the back. On the Flikr account, I can maybe see it being concealed in the blue-ish laptop but I can't figure out where it is on the other two. Perhaps it is folded up?

    Why are they showing us pictures of them just sitting there? Why aren't their pictures of people powering them up or people checking e-mail/forums?

    Possibly the biggest problem working on this laptop is its small 12' screen. I wish I could see what kind of resolution that results in but I can't see the screen in any of these shots.

    If you want to make the pledge but don't know the specs, check out the Wikipedia article on it.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Hand Powered? by Trigun · · Score: 5, Informative

      From what I've been reading on these ones, is that the pictured ones are not crank-powered. The dynamo ones will be made available though.

    2. Re:Hand Powered? by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check this for better pictures of these:

      http://www.laptop.org/download.en_US.html

      Still not sure what the "ears" are for.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Hand Powered? by JanneM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Possibly the biggest problem working on this laptop is its small 12' screen. I wish I could see what kind of resolution that results in but I can't see the screen in any of these shots.

      My current laptop has a 10.4' screen at 1024x768, and I actually use it as my main machine, both for writing and development. My plan was to complement this machine with a full-size desktop, but that purchase got delayed for various reasons and I found I don't need one after all.

      Yes, the screen is small, but since I sit close to it (the whole machine being compact), it's not a problem for me in practice.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:Hand Powered? by punkr0x · · Score: 1

      I thought they decided the crank was impractical and did away with it in favor of a foot pedal, after Bill Gates made fun of the crank. I hope not, I still think the crank is a good idea.

    5. Re:Hand Powered? by nincehelser · · Score: 1

      The hand crank idea was dropped because of the resulting mechanical stresses involved.

      That makes a lot of sense. The torque on the screen, motherboard, and body would eventually lead to failures. A foot pedal or hand crank attached through a wire would solve the problem.

    6. Re:Hand Powered? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Odd, if you look at picture http://www.laptop.org/en_US/blue-front.jpg
      you can obviously see the crank handle on the side tucked in.

      At http://www.flickr.com/photos/pete/152018285/in/set -72057594143224765/
      it looks like the handle is broken off..

    7. Re:Hand Powered? by donnyspi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the ears are just port covers. I think this laptop is meant to be rugged and able to take a hit.

    8. Re:Hand Powered? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually a foot pedal is a much better idea than a hand crank, if you are going to offer some sort of alternative power source. At least a person could conceivably use the computer while it's being charged that way, instead of having to stop using the computer every few minutes to crank it back up.

      Actually I think the best thing they could do is make a charging circuit that accepts a very wide range of input voltages and frequencies, and then provide a variety of methods for providing power. Hand cranks, foot pedals, stationary bicycles, whatever. It's not hard to make a little generator out of an old AC motor and the back end of a bicycle set up on blocks (it's not terribly efficient either, granted), and you could charge a whole lot of laptops at once that way. The thing that's prohibitive about setting something like that up in the third world would be cleaning and regulating the power to the requirements of most portable devices. But if you designed the device to accept a big voltage and frequency range, I think people would figure out how to power it, if you gave them some ideas. In many cases, people may already have a source of mechanical power that's superior to muscle power, it's just a question of making the system adaptable.

      Oh, and use a plug that's not horrendously obnoxious to work with. I'd say the best thing to do would be to use dual-bananna plugs as inputs on the laptop itself (maybe half-depth), since you can pretty easily shove a piece of bare wire in there if you needed to.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    9. Re:Hand Powered? by Black+Perl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Possibly the biggest problem working on this laptop is its small 12' screen.

      I don't know about you, but I'd consider a twelve-foot screen huge.

      But even a 12" screen is plenty large for a laptop like this. I had a 10.4" screen on a Sony Vaio and loved it. I replaced it with a 12" (different brand) because it was cheaper but would have loved another thin 10.4". It's the same pixel resolution, so it's not like you're losing any desktop space by going to the smaller screen.

      --
      bp
    10. Re:Hand Powered? by Justifiable_Delusion · · Score: 1

      The crank part of it was removed. A few weeks (months) I read an article talking about the stresses that having a crank inside of the machine would cause due to the magnetism and other things going on. They diceded more so to help develop other power sources along with the laptop to make it work. At one point, I think Negroponte made a quip that the younger brother would pedal the bike while the older would surf, and vice versa.

      Either way. I am going to buy a few to donate. The global conciousness must arise and be educated.

      --
      Mad, adj : Affected with a high degree of intellectual independence. Ambrose Bierce - The Deveil's Dictionsary
    11. Re:Hand Powered? by shdragon · · Score: 1

      The last item I read on it, they found the hand crank idea wasn't going to work, so they opted not to use it.

      --
      "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
    12. Re:Hand Powered? by sparkz · · Score: 1
      Possibly the biggest problem working on this laptop is its small 12' screen
      You call a 12 foot screen small?
      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    13. Re:Hand Powered? by Braino420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think they also serve as directional WiFi antennas.

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    14. Re:Hand Powered? by space_biker · · Score: 1

      Great idea...but what's the cost? Each added circuitry is going to add cost. Plus you'll need an engineer to set up the generator. You'll need to keep the hand-crank anyway because you won't always be near your generator. The foot pedal seems good too, but you'll need to stow it and the cord. What if the cord breaks? I think the current design is a great compromise between form, function, and flexibility.

    15. Re:Hand Powered? by uradu · · Score: 1

      The crank has now been incorporated into the screen hinge--you tilt the screen back and forth in a pumping motion to charge the battery. The little ears on top are really just grab handles for a better pumping action.

    16. Re:Hand Powered? by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      from what ive read, its a SEVEN inch screen. just look at the pictures, this computer is almost a pda, its very very small. look at this picture here, this is a little kids hands and the thing still looks small compared to them.

      http://www.laptop.org/en_US/laptop-handside.jpg

    17. Re:Hand Powered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Possibly the biggest problem working on this laptop is its small 12' screen.
      So many people pouncing on this trivial error, and still no Spinal Tap Stonehenge references. I'm disappointed.
    18. Re:Hand Powered? by maggard · · Score: 3, Informative
      A foot pedal is excellent until you try and drag the whole kit to school. Then back home. Then back again. Then home. Repeat. Then an integrated hand crank becomes easier to handle (so to speak.) Also these things are expected to run a few HOURS on a good cranking, not "having to stop using the computer every few minutes to crank it back up." If these kids can walk to school they can crank for 10 or so minutes to get their laptop running before class, and the same at home when they're in for the night.

      Regrding the electrical supply, I expect the problem isn't so much technical as regulatory. There are fairly specific rules, which are defacto laws, regarding where & what sort of power supplies can be integrated into consumer products. While these rules come from the 1st world nations (many countries just ditto US or EU or whomever for whole blocks of construction & product codes) they apply as well to 3rd world nations - it IS a global market, global standards, and everyone deserves safe products. So what sort of electrical supply is installed, and how it plugs in, isn't entirely up to designers.

      On a tangent, there used to be a metal bar in second generation IBM PC's called the "Rube Goldberg connector". Underwriters Laboratories & such required that power-supplies be placed in the rear of PCs, so that was where the "Big Red Switch" was also located, as part of the power supply. However this was awkward to get at, so IBM innovated and put a button on front. They still used the equivalent of the "BRS" internally, all they did was run a small metal bar (wire coathanger gauge, but a bit stiffer) from the front power button across the inside of the PC to the power supply.

      Lastly, it is interesting to note that there is only one existing glabal standard for power, adopted in every nation: Power Over Ethernet. Same plug, same supply, same logic, all over the planet, for the few folks that use it.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    19. Re:Hand Powered? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      If you look at the blue model, you'll see a space to the right of the keyboard where the crank handle is supposed to go. But the other two models don't seem to have any provision for a crank. It sounds as if they're moving away from that idea.

    20. Re:Hand Powered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs a crank? Why not make them "shake" powered like this

      Ah yes... the Porn-Powered(tm) laptop. Now *that's* a killer app.

    21. Re:Hand Powered? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Power over Ethernet, you say? Oh yeah!

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    22. Re:Hand Powered? by dajak · · Score: 1

      Negroponte was wrong. The idea of wanting to directly integrate power generation into the device is fundamentally flawed. There are both technical and functional objections to doing that. Bringing power generation and power consumption closer together is the right idea, but including a separate hand crank in each device is impractical. There's a limit to the amount of younger brothers people have.

      What the world needs is a standardized, cheap, robust, modular, switchable DC power supply brick, with builtin UPS and battery charger, that can power multiple devices at different voltages (at the same time), and accepts pedal, hand crank, DC solar or wind power, biomass fueled engine, and AC mains. Give people the brick with pedal, and later upgrade by extending microcredit for adding a solar panel or an efficient biomass generator/cooking stove. Many people who are poor now will actually be able to save for a solar panel without credit when they stop buying disposable batteries. It is sometimes shocking to see how inefficient and expensive being poor can be.

      Obviously, if you don't have access to AC mains power and have to crank or pedal yourself, you don't want unnecessary AC/DC conversion losses. Everything that is important for the third world runs on low voltage DC power. Only a complete idiot would pedal to generate power for the AC washing machine, instead of washing by hand. The tradeoff for washing is fundamentally different from pedaling for a minute to send an email vs. walking a day to the nearest big town to mail a letter.

    23. Re:Hand Powered? by scuffell · · Score: 1

      I attended FUDCON 2006 in Boston, and it looked like they were not going to use the dynamo idea...maybe I'm wrong, but I'm sure the guy said it was too hard to prevent the laptops from breaking with a crank.

    24. Re:Hand Powered? by cwgmpls · · Score: 1

      Possibly the biggest problem working on this laptop is its small 12' screen. The classic Macintosh shipped with a 9" monochrome screen, sold millions of units, and revolutionized personal computing. If a 12" screen is the biggest problem of this unit, I'd say we may be looking at a new personal computing revolution.

    25. Re:Hand Powered? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Yes, the screen is small, but since I sit close to it (the whole machine being compact), it's not a problem for me in practice.

      We're also a bit spoiled.

      If this was the first computer you'd ever had, the screen probably wouldn't seem small. I grew up using an Apple IIe with a 13" monitor at 320x240, and it was fine at the time.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    26. Re:Hand Powered? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Stonehenge, where the demons dwell
      Where the banshees live, and they do live well...

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    27. Re:Hand Powered? by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      I think this laptop is meant to be rugged and able to take a hit.

      Sort of like...this, and this.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    28. Re:Hand Powered? by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      It's not the physical size of the screen, it's the resolution (693x520).

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    29. Re:Hand Powered? by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Umm, a 12" screen is more than enough, in fact a 7.5" screen would work. These are for third-world countries, they don't need 16x12 resolution on 15" screens... me thinks you have no clue. When you are the one cranking the thing for power, and not sitting in your big chair with cheeto fingers with a dual screen LCD setup you would be pretty damn thankful for the design.

      For what it is, these things are amazing. The idea is a great one. It may or may not work, but instead of just dropping boxes of food and having them scrounge it up like animals this may actually open up whole new worlds/ideas/educational opportunities. Open up your mind for a minute and try to see the bigger picture here.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    30. Re:Hand Powered? by NewmanBlur · · Score: 1

      That seems to be correct, according to this article, dated April 4:

      "But having a hand crank stuck to the device likely would have subjected the machine to too many wrenching forces, so it will now be connected to the AC electrical adapter.

      In fact, because the adapter can rest on the ground, the power generator might take the form of a foot pedal rather than a hand crank altogether."

      --
      Per ardua ad astra.
    31. Re:Hand Powered? by Whanana · · Score: 1

      The ears are directional wireless antennas. They double as USB covers when you aren't using a wireless connection.

    32. Re:Hand Powered? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Possibly the biggest problem working on this laptop is its small 12' screen.

      I dunno, 12 feet diagonal seems like it would be large enough for just about anything.

      But seriously, it wasn't that long ago that we were all working on desktop computers with 13"-viewable CRTs and 640x480 resolutions. Or worse; the original Macintoshes had an 8-inch, 1-bit monochrome screen, and they turned out to be plenty useful.

    33. Re:Hand Powered? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Minor nitpick:

      I grew up using an Apple IIe with a 13" monitor at 320x240, and it was fine at the time.

      Hi-Res displayed 280x192 on a monochrome monitor. On a color monitor, the effective resolution was closer to 140x192, with 6 colors that were available (with some restrictions on color placement). With 128K, double Hi-Res boosted the monochrome resolution to 560x192. Color resolution would've still been 140x192, but with 16 colors available instead of 6 (and with fewer restrictions on color placement).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    34. Re:Hand Powered? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Lastly, it is interesting to note that there is only one existing glabal standard for power, adopted in every nation: Power Over Ethernet. Same plug, same supply, same logic, all over the planet, for the few folks that use it.

      What about automobile cigarette lighter plugs?

      They're a pretty much worldwide de facto standard (with the exception I guess of some older vehicles that don't have 12V electrical systems). Is there anyplace that doesn't use the standard connector?

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    35. Re:Hand Powered? by Stellian · · Score: 2, Informative
      Also these things are expected to run a few HOURS on a good cranking, not "having to stop using the computer every few minutes to crank it back up." If these kids can walk to school they can crank for 10 or so minutes to get their laptop running before class, and the same at home when they're in for the night.

      You are wrong:
      The minimum acceptable crank time to operating time is 1:10, i.e. one minute of cranking the generator powers 10 minutes of operation. The hoped-for power consumption in ebook mode is 1:40 to 1:60, i.e. one minute of cranking powers 40 minutes to one hour of ebook reading.

      It's much harder to produce energy by manual labor than people think. For example lifting a 100Kg weight for one meter generates 1KJ = 0.3Wh = 10 minutes of operation for a 2W laptop.
      That's even worse than what Bill Gates said:
      ...get a decent computer where you can actually read the text and you're not sitting there cranking the thing while you're trying to type.
    36. Re:Hand Powered? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I'd consider a twelve-foot screen huge.

      I dunno, recently I've been hooking up a Sony Jumbotron to my rig and I have to say anything under 30 foot and you're getting into some hard to read text.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    37. Re:Hand Powered? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      From an article that came out awhile ago it seems they've moved it to the power adapter because putting it on the actual body would subject the laptop to possibly harmful amounts of stress.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  5. Substitute screen? by RobotWisdom · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are they claiming that screen is the production version, or just a placeholder? Because last I heard the (specially lowcost) screen was still being developed...

    1. Re:Substitute screen? by benjjj · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised it's in color. You'd think a big old-iPod-style B&W screen would do the job and save a bunch of cash.

    2. Re:Substitute screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The first-generation OLPC laptops are expected to have a novel low-cost TFT LCD display. Later generations of the OLPC laptop are expected to use low-cost, low-power and high-resolution electronic paper displays.


      The display is actually very clever. You can run it both in color mode and b&w mode (with higher resolution).
      wikipedia

    3. Re:Substitute screen? by uradu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a grayscale TFT screen without or with an optional backlight would seem to provide signigicant power savings. But it's probably a matter of availability and economies of scale--all R&D is in color TFT screens, so those are likely to be the cheapest. A monochrome screen nowadays would have to be a custom development, driving up costs.

    4. Re:Substitute screen? by Mawbid · · Score: 1
      That was pretty common in the C64 days.

      The really clever part was that some games would change the display mode during each screen refresh to use different modes at the top and bottom of the screen. You could have low resolution and color for most of the screen, and then some high resolution mono text at the bottom.

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
    5. Re:Substitute screen? by Basje · · Score: 1

      With the cbm64 you could program per raster line (and later even parts of that, with some timing trick).

      That was the way those color bars, border sprites and one line scrollers worked: those lines were altered. 0314/EA31 interrupts were used for it.

      So it wasn't just a split screen, it was a lot of splitscreens (and it left me with some really obsolete knowledge).

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
  6. I would love to buy one by scenestar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just not in that fluorecent green or orange.

    cant they sell me a plain black one?

    sure as hell would replace my pda/ipod/other crap I haul around

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:I would love to buy one by punkr0x · · Score: 1

      Lol. You wanna replace your iPod with one of these? It doesn't even have a hard disk.

    2. Re:I would love to buy one by OakDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I heard the juvenile colors were intended to discourage light-fingered adults against stealing them from kids.

    3. Re:I would love to buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually...(and I certainly may be mistaken on this, but I'll say it anyway)

      As I understood it, having heard/read this someplace, the color scheme was to make them easily to identify. When the laptops are distributed, they will be advertised/stressed as "educational" and for school children.

      If/when someone decides to steal a laptop, there would be a cultural taboo on that person, as he/she would be recognized from the laptop's loud colors as someone who stole a computer meant for a child.

    4. Re:I would love to buy one by ironring2006 · · Score: 1
      cant they sell me a plain black one?

      Sorry, the current market indicates that there is a $200 premium to upgrade your laptop to the colour black, so it's going to cost more than $100.

    5. Re:I would love to buy one by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1
      If/when someone decides to steal a laptop, there would be a cultural taboo on that person, as he/she would be recognized from the laptop's loud colors as someone who stole a computer meant for a child.

      Or someone who bought a $300 one so two children could also have one?

    6. Re:I would love to buy one by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      The plain black one is going to be $150 more, and will be part of the lesser known $250 Laptop Initiative.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    7. Re:I would love to buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The $300 (or whatever price they put them at) ones could be in different colours to differentiate them.

    8. Re:I would love to buy one by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I heard the juvenile colors were intended to discourage light-fingered adults against stealing them from kids.
      Brilliant idea. Won't work.

      I find it very amusing that the MIT team assumes that cultural norms in the West will be matched in the darkest Africa.

      I find the implied bigotry (only kids need computers) less amusing.

    9. Re:I would love to buy one by ImaLamer · · Score: 1
    10. Re:I would love to buy one by punkr0x · · Score: 1

      Yeah, then you can have a big, clunky iPod replacement! Wait, do these laptops even have an audio chip...?

    11. Re:I would love to buy one by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      "I heard the juvenile colors were intended to discourage light-fingered adults against stealing them from kids."

      I think the color would also prevent many students from using them in the United States. If you're carrying around a laptop that looks like that then you're going to be made fun of before you even open it.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    12. Re:I would love to buy one by thealsir · · Score: 1

      yes.

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
  7. Are there TWO track pads? by chazzzzy · · Score: 1

    It looks liek there are 2 track pads? How would you use those?

    1. Re:Are there TWO track pads? by chazzzzy · · Score: 1

      Oh.. on closer inspection.. it's one huge trackpad and 2 huge buttons. Weird.

    2. Re:Are there TWO track pads? by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      1 pad, double wide. Why? Dunno.

    3. Re:Are there TWO track pads? by lamber45 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that there's one on each side of the screen so that the user can use his right hand or his left hand. I like the design, although it looks like they've decided to steal the Ubuntu colors...

    4. Re:Are there TWO track pads? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      It would serve as a "writing tablet" -- presumably for languages where keyboards aren't really suitable (I'm looking at you, China).

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    5. Re:Are there TWO track pads? by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      Just a gues, but Id suspect its becuase they are being targeted at kids... nice big buttons etc are easier for young kids to use.

    6. Re:Are there TWO track pads? by Funkcikle · · Score: 1

      It is for pen input, to practise handwriting.

    7. Re:Are there TWO track pads? by wed128 · · Score: 1

      it's actually wider than double wide, to allow it to be used to learn handwriting.

    8. Re:Are there TWO track pads? by Arnos · · Score: 0

      Obligatory:

      NO- but there are FOUR lights!!!!

  8. Dupe? by blcamp · · Score: 4, Informative


    Photos have been out for some time, actually.

    http://laptop.media.mit.edu/

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
    1. Re:Dupe? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      They were the photos of the first prototype.

      The photo's we're looking at on flickr are that prototype and two (three?) more models.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  9. linux by millwall · · Score: 0, Troll

    MITs $100 laptop was unveiled at the Seven Countries Task Force Meeting. It runs a special version of the Fedora linux

    But.... Does it run Linux???

    DOH!!!

  10. I'm in... by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'll pay for three and donate two any day of the week. I'm not rolling in cash mind you, but if I can help by providing something for those that can't afford it, then I think that is my responsibility, especially if I espouse the Free Software ideal.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
    1. Re:I'm in... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      For that matter, where can you buy a better new laptop for $300?

    2. Re:I'm in... by greenguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Won't someone think of the children?? Oh, wait... someone did!

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    3. Re:I'm in... by Raleel · · Score: 1

      Dell, actually. at least last week you could. their b120 model, IIRC.

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    4. Re:I'm in... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      I think it would be better if they had it at $200, buy 1 and give 1 situation. With an option to pay the $200 and giving both to needy children.

      $300 seems like a steep pricepoint to me to get in as a consumer or a donator. $199 sounds affordable to me either way - cheap for a gadget I might like and cheap as a total donation.

      Looking at the pricing of consoles (a generation past) and the Nintendo Wii might show this.

    5. Re:I'm in... by uradu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, $200 - $250 would be a very decent price point. In fact, for the Western markets they should simply skip the gimmicky "buy one and donate x" and simply set the price so a portion of it goes towards that automatically.

    6. Re:I'm in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not rolling in cash mind you, but if I can help by providing something for those that can't afford it, then I think that is my responsibility

      I lost my job and can no longer afford a hooker. Please help me out! Oh...wait...that statement could be taken very much in the wrong way. "Please give me money for a hooker!" That's better.

    7. Re:I'm in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't afford one for myself at the outrageous price of $300, but I can certainly afford it as a computer for my kids.

      I would like to think that at $300 these will become the Christmas/Hannukah gift of choice for 2006, and become the computer of choice for schools that think their kids need computers.

    8. Re:I'm in... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Of course, what isn't stated very clearly in the original blurb is that the laptop manufacturers have never said they will sell them at that price. The page that the $300 pledge link goes to is essentially an online petition that they're trying to get people to sign. So far they have about 500 out of the 100,000 they're looking for. So don't get your hopes up that you'll be able to buy one.

      Still, if they did sell them, I'd get one.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    9. Re:I'm in... by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      I'd be glad to as well, but I'm worried about the whole "stigma" thing.

      They specifically said they were trying to create a stigma around having one if you aren't a student. I love the idea of help out in this way, but I don't want everybody thinking I lifted one off some kid.

      Now, if they shipped the $300 ones in a special donor color, I'd be all over that. You can't tell me that wouldn't be good for picking up women :)

  11. Re:And it looks like... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
    ...something Fisher Price would put out.

    I don't think these were running Windows XP were they?

  12. Ethan Zuckerman - one bit short of a nybble? by fatphil · · Score: 1, Insightful

    On the 'worldchanging' link on the pledge page, quoth Ethan Zuckerman:
    """
    I wonder if the hinges are going to be a problem - the current design requires a hinge for the gasket and a separate hinge that allows 340 degrees of freedom between the screen and the keyboard.
    """

    Yeah, right. How about you learn what engineering terms mean before you use them in _completely the wrong way_.

    Sheesh, and such blog journalism is the future, eh? ${DEITY} help us.
    FatPhil

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    1. Re:Ethan Zuckerman - one bit short of a nybble? by troon · · Score: 1

      To be fair, he's not wrong, the sentence is unfortunately ambiguous. The hinge must provide the freedom to turn 340 degrees, which is what he said.

      At least, I assume that's what's meant, rather than a massively multidimensional hinge...

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    2. Re:Ethan Zuckerman - one bit short of a nybble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather than being an ass and simply trashing someone's ability to use "engineering terms" why not point out where he's wrong and where his mistakes were..

      It's great that his "misuse of terms" made you feel like you're smart, but why not point out the mistakes and explain yourself instead of just making random claims.

    3. Re:Ethan Zuckerman - one bit short of a nybble? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Oh come on - I extracted the sentence with the blooper in - how much more trimming did you want me to do? /Degrees of freedom/ map approximately onto dimensions, or coordinates.
      To specify a hinge position, you only need to specify one coordinate - an angle; hence it has one degree of freedom.

      Monitors with a fixed base on the desk would have 2 degrees of freedom - a left/right angle, and an up/down angle. If it can move on the desktop it has 2 more degrees of freedom ((x,y) coordinates). If the desktop can be raised or lowered, it has an additional 5th degree of freedom.

      The most a rigid body can have is 6 degrees of freedom - 3 position, and 3 direction. The one that the above monitor lacks is the ability to rotate in-plane - flipping from landscape to portrait mode, for example.

      An anglepoise lamp with a fixed base will typically have 2 (base) + 1 (elbow) + 2 (wrist) degrees of freedom. More join joints means more degrees of freedom.

      Hence the absurdity of 340 degrees of freedom.

      FatPhil

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    4. Re:Ethan Zuckerman - one bit short of a nybble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, not all of us are engineers. Some of us are real scientists.

    5. Re:Ethan Zuckerman - one bit short of a nybble? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Degrees of freedom are a mathematical concept. If you're that unaware of the tools without upon which science and engineering are based, then you can't be much of either.

      However, like all anonymous cowards you can't be either, as you're a nobody.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    6. Re:Ethan Zuckerman - one bit short of a nybble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're that guy that blocks everyone in line at the supermarket trying to comprehend the "12 items or less" sign.

      A technically absurd phrase, but somehow everyone else can understand the intent.

      Speaking of which:
      The most a rigid body can have is 6 degrees of freedom - 3 position, and 3 direction.
      You must mean, "3 positional, and 3 directional". The terms "3 position" and "3 direction" are absurd.

      Take your own medicine.

      (the only reason to reply to this post is to flatter yourself)

  13. 419 on its way by User+956 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, does Nigeria really *need* more people with computers and internet access?

    I mean, seriously...

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:419 on its way by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      All we can hope is that with the money they're saving on these $100 laptops, they'll feel less of a need to scam everyone to make up the difference!

    2. Re:419 on its way by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 4, Funny

      The children have to be taught how to spam. It doesn't come naturally.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  14. /. effect by i_should_be_working · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's hard to be certain because you can't zoom in, but this may be the coolest example of the /. effect ever.

    1. Re:/. effect by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Ouch 100,000 signers in 5 months? They'd better get the word out some more. I would not know about this except through Slashdot.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:/. effect by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      Poor PledgeBank, went down realy fast. And for good reasons :)

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    3. Re:/. effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried several times today to get in to the Pledge Bank and have not been able to get there, most likely due to the /. effect. I am making a mental note to myself to go back out there and make the pledge in a couple of days.

      In a way, I am hopeful that this /. effect will continue for a lot longer than normal, I would love to see this site remain slashdotted for at least several days because it would mean that so many of us are stepping up to the plate.

      Hey Taco or someone else at the Slashdot command center - can you figure out a way of putting a donate link on the front page for a couple of weeks? That would be way cool and would really help a good cause!

    4. Re:/. effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure, and like it says
      We appreciate your interest in the $100 Laptop initiative.

      If your message is related to purchasing: please note that the $100 laptops--not yet in production--will not be available for sale. The laptops will only be distributed to schools directly through large government initiatives.

      So, don't even bother.
    5. Re:/. effect by legirons · · Score: 1

      "936 people have signed up, 99064 more needed"

      I think they're safe for now...

  15. EARS! by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    Is the the first thing I thought. Wonder if we'll see more ears? Maybe a camera nose?

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

    1. Re:EARS! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      When I get mine, I want to hook it up to my network with a really long cable, and loop it around the top a lot. Then it'll have cable hair!

  16. Food & Water by johnnyR · · Score: 0

    doesn't the developing world need clean water and food more than laptops? maybe even the ability of not being dragged out of your home and murdered rather than laptops? i do see what is trying to be accomplished here but there are bigger issues than getting the poor on the net.

    --
    The gun is good - Zardoz
    1. Re:Food & Water by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      doesn't the developing world need clean water and food more than laptops?

      Sure, but they also need education so that they can learn to sustain themselves and perhaps prepare themselves for their adults lives (you know, teach a man to fish...). Good education can be scarce so this project is out to help them by giving them laptops that will be their schoolbooks and surrogate teachers. So hopefully when they grow up the cycle that has gone on to keep them underdeveloped may have a chance to be broken. This project is a good thing.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  17. I'll wait for the final version. by elgee · · Score: 1

    I might buy one at $300, but I want to see the final version first. This is just a prototype and the final version might be very different.

    1. Re:I'll wait for the final version. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Vista's promises scarred me too.

    2. Re:I'll wait for the final version. by nuzak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The screen alone on those things probably costs more than $100. They can't go with CRTs and still hope to be dynamo-powered, so I don't know what kind of goldmine they've discovered as far as LCD screens go.

      God help them if they're relying on the largesse of their suppliers.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  18. Software Question by rlp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it come with the Young Lady's Illustrated Primer?

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Software Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent semi-obscure reference!

    2. Re:Software Question by necro81 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I was lucky enough to have moderator points today, I'd mod that up for a well-placed geek cultural reference.

      On a more serious note, I think that your comment has more going for it than just that. Considering the people who will be using these devices, I almost think that it should have something along those lines. After all, all the laptops in the world can only be of so much use - one needs ways to educate people on their use as well. Sure, there'll be the precocious ones out there who will tinker around with the laptop and learn it front to back within a year or two without anyone teaching them.

      Most, like the rest of us mere mortals, will need some help and instruction along the way. Are there enough teachers in the wide world to go along with these laptops? I don't know. Bundling them with a sort of interactive and adaptive user's manual (not just for the computer, but for a total education) wouldn't be such a bad idea.

      Aiming it towards the empowerment of women in the third world would go a long way, too, I think.

    3. Re:Software Question by bgarcia · · Score: 2, Funny
      Are there enough teachers in the wide world to go along with these laptops?
      I'm sure there are plenty of Nigerians willing to train young children in the finer points of email and Western Union money transfers.
      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    4. Re:Software Question by Hillgiant · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does the cover have the words "Don't Panic" in freindly yellow letters?

      --
      -
    5. Re:Software Question by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The principal aim has been to get governments to buy them for their whole school-age populations in bulk -- I suspect that most countries will have their own standard software package. Given the limited space, I think that keeping the packages slim is going to be essential, which may be a strike against a "standard" package of applications for the whole world, since (for one thing) unused languages are going to be a giant waste of space. There are different concerns when you have 500MB of storage rather than the dozens -- or hundreds -- of gigabytes that most of us are used to on our main computers.

    6. Re:Software Question by rlp · · Score: 2, Informative

      The YLIP was Stephensons vision of the ultimate adaptive AI teaching tool. Clearly nothing like that (or even close) exists. However, w/o a collection of good cheap (or free) CAE software, the laptops are not likely to have a whole lot of impact. Ideally, the educational software would be open-source, free, very modular, extensible, small (quick downloads), user friendly, easily internationalized, and compelling. This is an opportunity for the OSS community to dramatically leverage MIT's work. And who knows - maybe some group of developers WILL create the YLIP.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    7. Re:Software Question by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      No, but it has "Welcome to Windows Vista, 3rd World Edition" movies looping on it.

    8. Re:Software Question by rlp · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the easiest mechanism for distribution would be to place educational software on a single USB flash drive connected to one machine in a classroom mesh. The software on the USB drive could be downloaded, if the school has an internet connection or the USB flash drive could be delivered from a central point.

      I agree that the software would have to be small and unneccesary lnaguages would not be shipped or installed. But if the software was sufficiently modular - a localization pack could be developed for each country separate from the core software. Only the core and ONE localization pack would be installed.

      Each country will probably develop their own software, but it would be nice if there was a central repository somewhere to share the best of it, and to accept and distribute OSS contributions.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    9. Re:Software Question by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Given the nature of the open source community, I see the odds of such a repository (or several, with different views of "best") happening, at least for free software for the platform, to be so close to unity as makes no difference, whether or not the project sponsors do anything to encourage it -- assuming, of course, the project acheives anything like it hopes to in terms of simply distributing laptops.

  19. Since when did a Speak & Spell cost 100 bucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did a Speak & Spell cost 100 bucks?

  20. missings modes? by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is great that the project is advancing, but I was dissappointed that the laptop wasn't capable of changing to other modes as was originally planned. Check out the image in the wikipedia article -- there is a carrying mode, a theater mode, a laptop mode, and a tablet mode. However, this first prototype has only the laptop modes we are familiar with.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:missings modes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all modes are still available in this prototype, see the pictures page of the OLPC site:
      http://www.laptop.org/download.en_US.html

  21. Re:And it looks like... by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    If you have a better idea what electronics intended to be used by kids should look like, feel free to let us know.

  22. more useful info by user24 · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.laptop.org/map.en_US.html gives a colour coded map of planned distribution areas

    and from the FAQ (laptop.org/faq.en_US.html):

    The proposed $100 machine will be a Linux-based, with a dual-mode display--both a full-color, transmissive DVD mode, and a second display option that is black and white reflective and sunlight-readable at 3× the resolution. The laptop will have a 500MHz processor and 128MB of DRAM, with 500MB of Flash memory; it will not have a hard disk, but it will have four USB ports. The laptops will have wireless broadband that, among other things, allows them to work as a mesh network; each laptop will be able to talk to its nearest neighbors, creating an ad hoc, local area network. The laptops will use innovative power (including wind-up) and will be able to do most everything except store huge amounts of data.

  23. Nice idea for a pledge, but will it work? by ylikone · · Score: 1

    The comments on the pledge say that they will not be selling these laptops to the public... only available through government systems. While this idea of buy 3, donate 2 seems great, it won't work if the makers are not even considering selling these commercially. I imagine that they might be taking a loss on manufacturing these and are only going to give them to the poor who need them. In the western world, if you can think about paying triple for a laptop, then you probably also don't have a problem in just giving $200 to world vision or something. Take your remaining $100 and buy an old used Pentium 1 laptop from ebay if you really need one and install something like Damn Small Linux.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Nice idea for a pledge, but will it work? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This pledge thing will carry little weight. It carries about as much weight as a Online Petitiion.

      --

      Gorkman

    2. Re:Nice idea for a pledge, but will it work? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Laptops really hold their value well, you can hardly get anything (even used) for $100, even if you're willing to risk the high liklihood of an ebay clunker that doesn't even work or include necessary bits like AC adapter and working battery. This thing is 500 mhz. I don't think it's that bad a deal at $300. But I guess we'll have to wait for the linpack results :)

    3. Re:Nice idea for a pledge, but will it work? by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1
      Another huge difference is that it allows them to produce three times as many laptops. Like anything else there are economies of scale that make things become less expensive as you produce more of them. In essence by buying three you make the entire lot less expensive per piece.

      This is why they have stated that they won't produce any until they have orders for at least one million units.

  24. Re:And it looks like... by ylikone · · Score: 1

    Actually, they don't look that bad... I was just commenting on how they DO look like kids laptops... because they are! Anyway, I also read that they make them in these stand-out colors so as to prevent theft.

    --
    Meh.
  25. Vista by ylikone · · Score: 1
    But will it run Vista?!

    Double Doh!!

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Vista by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Apparently, it will run Vista about as well as a Levono laptop ... http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/24/132622 3

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  26. Would Jobs have liked the pledges? by ianscot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is purely speculation, but one has to wonder how Jobs would have felt about the Pledge-at-triple-price system, in which OS X laptops would essentially have been sold at 300 bucks. The new MacBook product is selling for more than 3 times that. How many people would have jumped on a $300 Mac laptop? Toss in the social cause good vibe, and you'd be selling a lot of these where college students would have chosen a MacBook instead.

    (But yeah, you're right, Jobs "got" this project, whereas Gates displayed his usual defensively arrogant mediocrity.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Would Jobs have liked the pledges? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i don't think he would have worried really.. because you get what you pay for.. while these laptops are cool and i have already pledged for one.. they do not have the power that a mac book does.. which is why it will not change my mind about wanting to get a mac book..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:Would Jobs have liked the pledges? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Well, let's look at the target market -- children. Kids are rough on stuff, so I would expect these to be incredibly tough. Would you take your Mac to the beach? These things would likely survive the beach quite well, and may even survive drops quite well due to low weight and no moving parts. The best part is that if you DO break one, you are not out much dough.

      If I could get one for $200, I would jump on it.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    3. Re:Would Jobs have liked the pledges? by muhgcee · · Score: 1

      I am guessing a couple months after their release, or maybe sooner, you should be able to find some on eBay for $200.

    4. Re:Would Jobs have liked the pledges? by Bastian · · Score: 1

      With the kind of hardware that's going into these things, whatever OS X-derived OS might have made it onto them would not have been OS X. Some version of Darwin would have been on there. A stripped-down Aqua would probably be there. But I think chances are good that Cocoa would have been pulled out, simply because Objective-C and Cocoa apps take up more memory and CPU resources than equivalent Carbon apps. (I realize that the difference is pretty negligible in most cases, but these $100 laptops are a very constrained environment.) Plenty of other services and technologies on which many (if not most) OS X apps rely nowadays would have been pulled - Spotlight, Core Image, Core Data, maybe even some pretty major stuff like distributed objects and the global notification center, but that's starting to sound a lot less likely to me.

      Regardless, this $100 laptop would never be a $100 Mac, simply because the OS that went on it, while related to OS X, would not be able to run all OS X applications, and may not have been able to run many at all.

    5. Re:Would Jobs have liked the pledges? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you realize that modern Cocoa is the direct descendant of an ObjC application framework which ran smooth as silk on a workstation built around a 25MHz 68040 and a whopping 8MB of RAM. This thing is twenty times faster and has 16 times more volatile storage, I think it would handle it just fine. The newer techs, I agree on, but Cocoa itself is proven to run very well in more constrained environments than this.

    6. Re:Would Jobs have liked the pledges? by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I want to pledge, too, but it doesn't look like it's anything official... they said they weren't taking orders, even under this arrangement. Maybe I didn't read far enough along, but I got two contradictory directions...

      In one they said they were going to leave it up to the government to buy and supply to schools. That's just BAD BAD BAD, especially when you have so many people like us willing to help.

      Second, Negroponte said they might, eventually be available for retail sale, but "I doubt you'll be able to buy them at Best Buy."

      Still, I'll sign up... I think it's a great idea, and my son could probably use something like this next year; his own computer that he can take with him and link it up to our home system to print and so forth. We already have a wireless network. And if he's going to play games, he'll have to do it on our computer and we'll be able to keep an eye on him... this little laptop isn't exactly going to be a good gaming machine (well, text adventures might come back in vogue).

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    7. Re:Would Jobs have liked the pledges? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could get one for $200, I would jump on it.

      Well, they'd have to be tough if that's what you plan on doing with it.

  27. He's not very genuine by StringBlade · · Score: 1

    If this guy were genuine about his offer to buy a $100 for $300 he would have probably done two things:

    1. Bought one unconditionally
    2. Pledged to buy a second if 1,000 people also bought one (much more reasonable than 100,000)

    To me, it's just a bogus pledge that he posted with no intention of really buying a laptop at thrice the price - hence the exhorbitantly high number of required pledgers and the short timeline.

    Move along, nothing to see here. If you want to buy one buy one, but this guy doesn't.

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    1. Re:He's not very genuine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Short timeline? Did you notice that pledge started late last year?

    2. Re:He's not very genuine by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      For 100,000 people to sign with no fanfare whatsoever, 10 months is short. I would never have known about him save for the parent poster.

      That's like some muckety muck at Google writing down on a piece of paper a pledge to donate $5Mil to a children's hospital if 5 million google users send an email to him to test out Gmail. If he never tells anyone or posts that pledge in a high-traffic public area then it's a worthless gesture.

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    3. Re:He's not very genuine by AoT · · Score: 1

      So you didn't even read the summary?

      And we're suppose to take anything you say seriously?

    4. Re:He's not very genuine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pledged to buy a second if 1,000 people also bought one (much more reasonable than 100,000)

      I think you're missing something here. 100,000 pledges means that 100,000 will be manufactured. The cost per unit will be substantially lower than if only 1,000 were manufactured. So requiring 1,000 pledges would likely have required them to pledge a higher dollar amount...something that is inconsistant with the name of the machine.

    5. Re:He's not very genuine by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      You're right, I did miss that somewhat in my original read. However, if his point is to create a $100 laptop, then the goal should be to create a $100 laptop regardless of how many people will buy them. That is, it must cost $100 to create a prototype - not a mass-produced system with a minimum sales requirement.

      If he could create a $100 laptop without requiring 100,000 people to pledge to buy one then that would be a more worthy goal in my opinion. Additionally, if he wants to reach this goal, why set a time limit? Why not simply allow the goal to be reached by either:

      1) The cost of components drop over time until the laptop costs $100 to produce a single one, or
      2) 100,000 people pledge to buy one (but that may take much longer than October).

      That's my point.

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    6. Re:He's not very genuine by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      Not sure how you reached that conclusion. The summary doesn't state anything of consequence except to say that you can buy one at thrice the price in order to subsidize two others to needy children - very noble.

      However, upon following the link (which I must have done to know anything about his pledge) I noticed that he not only has a very high limit, but there's also a time limit. What kind of lofty and noble goal is it if it's unlikely to be reached by the given (again I say short) deadline?

      If he needs that many signers to use econmies of scale to bring the price down to $100 per machine, then he really didn't build a $100 machine now did he? Also, if the time limit expires and he does not get 100,000 signers (93,000 needed as of this writing) does he simply give up on the project? It makes no sense to me.

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
  28. For less then $1.00 a day... by dwayner79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this mean the commercials for world hunger will stop? Seriously, what will they look like when they show kids who have no food playing solitare on their hand cranked laptops.

    Sorry for being cynical, but every time this comes up, it amazes me. Good idea, but priorities seem out of wack.

    --
    Religion and politics, without the flame. godgab.org
    1. Re:For less then $1.00 a day... by linvir · · Score: 4, Informative

      The priorities seem out of whack to you because of your bigoted views of the developing world. Not everyone is starving to death

    2. Re:For less then $1.00 a day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, it seems a little odd. On the other hand, these are probably targeted towards areas that could use them (places that have at least some infrastructure to support a learning environment). An education and available information lasts much longer and has more uses than free food.

    3. Re:For less then $1.00 a day... by user24 · · Score: 1

      I think you're right. In fact more than that, I think you're undeniably right - Food, shelter, healthcare and education are more important than laptops.

      However, the people involved in this scheme are not going to very useful in helping developing countries get food or healthcare (etc). Instead, they're doing what they're best at. There isn't a limited amount of "charity" that forces us to decide "Shall we give people laptops or food" - we can easily give them both. All it requires is people in the right places to get together and make it happen. In this case, the technology people got together before the (more important) food and healthcare people.

      Yes the priorities are out of whack, but it's not the same people who are responsible for all the things that are needed. If it had been red cross or oxfam who decided to put all their energy into making cheap laptops then your priority question would be very relevent indeed, but as it is, this effort was the work of groups of people who realised they could realistically make a difference in one area, and did it. I say: "rock on".

    4. Re:For less then $1.00 a day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do you pay for your food?

      Do you not have an education and work on a computer?

      The whole problem in these countries is that there is no economy. Handing out free food all the time is just not sustainable (and in fact worsens the problem if you consider Lifeboat politics). While they could probably look at kick-starting an economy at a lower (and more direct) level, i think (and hope) that this will have a positive effect on the local economy.

    5. Re:For less then $1.00 a day... by TheBigBezona · · Score: 1

      It's easy to take this position with virtually any charitable initiative - why this and not that? The fact is there are lots of problems that need solving, and they all deserve attention to some degree or another.

      This initiative isn't replacing other causes, it's in addition to them. You are free to support whichever issue is most important to you - and no matter what it is, someone out there will disagree with your priorities.

    6. Re:For less then $1.00 a day... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of organizations dedicated to bringing food and shelter to the poor directly (the one my wife and I give to is "Food for the Poor", but there are certainly many to support.)

      But direct food aid and shelter construction alleviates short-term problems, but longer-term solutions are needed to deal with the problems that create poverty than that kind of immediate aid. That's why you have organizations working to improve sustainable agriculture in the developing world, groups working on fostering local economic development through various programs including microcredit, and groups working to improve long-term economic prospects by improving the educational opportunities through getting cheap, functional computers in the hands of children in the developing world.

  29. Could be a best seller... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    If Fisher-Price made them and sold them for $50 USD. Be the ultimate kiddie scripter hardware. :)

  30. Specs here by ylikone · · Score: 4, Informative
    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%24100_laptop

    Features: * CPU: AMD Geode GX2-533@1.1W * CPU clock speed: 400 Mhz with 0.25 W power consumption. * SVGA 7.5 diagonal transmissive and reflective liquid crystal display used in one of two modes: o Reflective "sunlight readable" monochrome mode with 1200 by 900 pixel resolution (for ebook reading outdoors--this is 200 dpi) o Transmissive Color/DVD mode with approximately 693 by 520 pixel resolution with backlighting (for laptop use) * 128 MB of DRAM * 512 MB of flash memory * Wireless networking using an "Extended Range" 802.11b wireless chipset run at a low bitrate (2 Mbit/s) to minimize power consumption. * Conventional layout alphanumeric keyboard localized for the country of use. * Touchpad for mouse control and handwriting input * Built-in stereo speakers * Built-in microphone * Audio based on the AC97 codec, with jacks for external stereo speakers and microphones, Line-out, and Mic-in * 3 external USB ports. * Power sources: o AC Cord that doubles as carrying strap o two C (R14) or D size rechargable batteries and a hand-crank generator o four C (LR14) or D (LR20) alkaline batteries.

    Intentionally omitted features: * no motor driven moving parts o no hard disk drive o no optical drive (e.g. CDROM or DVD drive) o no floppy drive * no IDE interface (as there are no drives with which to interface) * no PCMCIA card slot

    --
    Meh.
  31. Re:And it looks like... by donnyspi · · Score: 1

    If they were running XP, that'd be at least $100 right there!

  32. Lain by Kyru · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, it's a Navi, nice.

  33. Donating money to 3rd world countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    is like flusing your money down the toilet.

    A laptop for every child is great and all, but they'll get to where ever you want to send them and then..
    a) Gov't Officals will gladly help 'dispense them' - ie sell them.
    b) They'll be stolen and end up on the black market
    c) They'll end up busted and being more caustic crap in a landfill somewhere.

    I'd rather give laptops to under privilidged teenagers in eastern europe. At least maybe something would come out of it (hopefully not linux viruses).

    1. Re:Donating money to 3rd world countries... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can't remember where I read it, but I think they're planning on NOT letting local warlords into the distribution loop. How they'll get access to the countrties without paying said tribute (or getting shot) I don't know.

    2. Re:Donating money to 3rd world countries... by Doctor-Optimal · · Score: 1

      Or how they'll avoid having the warlords get in on secondary redistribution (i.e. "give me the laptops or I'll machete your family and your village"). It isn't that I don't think this is a noble cause (IT literacy is an excellent path out of poverty) but just that introducing an easily resalable commodity into very poor communities will not necessarily end well (although I guess if they sell it for food it would still end well, just not accomplish what was hoped). Mod this as a troll or a flamebait if you want, but I'll bet this will happen to the laptops, good intentions not withstanding.

      --
      New punctuation update "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm. ~
    3. Re:Donating money to 3rd world countries... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Selling that for FOOD? Hell, why?

      It looks like you have no idea about third world countries. The laptops will be sold either for booze or for weapons.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Donating money to 3rd world countries... by st.isaac · · Score: 1

      Are they considering the possibility of an illegal black market for OLPC laptops? If each child owns one, what's to prevent miltia from raiding a town and taking all of the laptops for resale?

  34. Window into the future of spam by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1, Troll

    When you look at that machine, imagine a little kid in a third world country using it... to spam and scam the crap out of us! After all, with the spam/scam market so lucrative, putting a machine like this in the hands of someone desperate for money is like handing a book of matches to a pyromaniac. Sure, matches aren't dangerous by themselves, but what are the circumstances here? If I can't afford a 100 dollar computer, I probably have trouble affording much of anything... and likely would be desperate enough to scam/spam if I knew I'd get some cash for it.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Window into the future of spam by linvir · · Score: 1

      Do you realise what you've just said? You're scared of kids with laptops in developing countries? Myself, I'm more scared of grown men with guns and knives in my own country.

    2. Re:Window into the future of spam by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      I'm not as scared of them as other things, of course, but I mean it has to at least cross your mind when you're distributing them.

      --
      stuff |
    3. Re:Window into the future of spam by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and when I eat meat with bones, there are thoughts that I can accidentaly choke or something.

      Get a grip. People, who are itended to spam/scam/steal, will do it anyway, anywhere. It is not matter of desperation - it is matter of ethics. I fail to see how American spam kings which have serious bunch of money in Swiss banks - and propably didn't live badly before that - do spamming out of despair.

      419 spamming is seperate issue and propably we don't know very much about that.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    4. Re:Window into the future of spam by david.given · · Score: 1
      When you look at that machine, imagine a little kid in a third world country using it... to spam and scam the crap out of us!

      With what net connection?

    5. Re:Window into the future of spam by rvqbl · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this comment would have been better if you qualified it at the beginning, "while I realize that this may benefit a great number of people, and while I realize that a great majority of children in third world countries have no more desire to harm people than children in wealthy countries..." Otherwise, your comment appears to be demeaning, classist and somewhat ignorant. Sure, let's just keep them poor and not give them any means or power to overcome it. Who knows what THEY will do with that sort of power. You are probably a decent person, but please have more sensitivity when posting something like the above.

    6. Re:Window into the future of spam by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I see that now, my bad! No need for someone like me to enter into troll territory, I just shouldn't attempt humor before 10:30 AM.

      --
      stuff |
  35. speak and spell? by aexiphixion · · Score: 0

    wow! looks like those guys at MIT have reinvented the speak and spell http://www.ritilan.com/archives/images/blogimages/ 040304_speakandspell.PNG

    1. Re:speak and spell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A protective case that it isn't flimsy white plastic like an iPod ... or got $200 worth of shiny titanium like a ToughBook? ToughS...

  36. hmm by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone got a couple of iPods.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  37. Fedora is bloatware, why not something smaller? by ylikone · · Score: 1, Informative

    Fedora seems to be too large of a desktop Linux to put onto these machines... same with Mandriva, SuSe, Ubuntu or Mepis. Why not a customized version of Damn Small, Puppy or Vector Linux? Would seem to be better choices in my opinion.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Fedora is bloatware, why not something smaller? by linvir · · Score: 2
      Watch as I blow your mind with my powers of reasoning...

      Why not a customised version of, get this, Fedora!! Damn Small, Puppy and Vector don't have as huge a community or any commercial backing to help with the customisation. They don't have as broad a range of software to choose from. With the exception of Vector, they are horrible to use.

      Your comparison is apples and oranges anyway, as you assume that the Fedora install is near-default and compare that to a customised version of other distros.

    2. Re:Fedora is bloatware, why not something smaller? by Raleel · · Score: 1

      They are probably looking at something like Redhat Desktop, which is pretty highly trimmed down.

      Then again, it's probably about as much redhat as DSL linux is debian... fruit from the same tree, but highly tweaked.

      I still can't believe they are going with gnome on it... I love gnome and all, but it's pretty slow on 128 megs

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    3. Re:Fedora is bloatware, why not something smaller? by carlislematthew · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree, although I would also consider ObscureLinux and WTFLinux. Or perhaps we could create another 10 competing new Linux distributions specifically for this project? That'll help...

    4. Re:Fedora is bloatware, why not something smaller? by mrogers · · Score: 1

      And it looks like the stripped-down version of Fedora will be available from the Red Hat public repository, so we can all benefit from the optimisations.

    5. Re:Fedora is bloatware, why not something smaller? by linvir · · Score: 1
      And more importantly, so as the users of the laptop can benefit from developers being able to simulate their working environment and cater for it.

      I'm interested in seeing whether it's usable as a day to day distro on normal hardware too. FC is nice and all, but it runs at 70+ degrees on my laptop.

  38. Re:Cheaper? by linvir · · Score: 1

    Haha, you've just made a real plonker of yourself by confusing Fedora with RHEL.

  39. Horns by Roger_Wilco · · Score: 2, Funny

    With those horns, shouldn't it be running BSD? :)

  40. Sign the Pledge and Mean it...Slashdotters! by haplo21112 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lets put a real world Slashdot effect to good use. I think I can manange to scape together $300 in the next year. Getting the bulk of slashdotters to sign up would go a long way toward the pledge goal.

    Yes, Yes they are not offical offering the thing up for sale, and it might never happen, but its worth it just to show support for the idea.

    If it came to be I'd more than likely donate the third machine too...although it might also make an interesting hack project, see how much effort it would take to add a real power supply and/or battery.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:Sign the Pledge and Mean it...Slashdotters! by Garabito · · Score: 1
      I think it would benefit the cause, not only because of the two laptops every buyer would donate, but also because it would put the laptop in the hands of open source hackers, which could potentially become developers for the project.

    2. Re:Sign the Pledge and Mean it...Slashdotters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it seems that we did it...
      ...again.

      www.pledgebank.com is down'n out !

      btw. I sent a mail to OLPC with an idea like that a year ago.

      I'm glad to see they are considering it.

  41. For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by Nijika · · Score: 5, Interesting
    So we all dig these laptops for their day to day durability, and their lack of moving vital parts (HDDs), and their portability, and their flexability.

    And we all want one for $100, and we'd all gladly pay up to $400 for one. I've got a PowerBook, and I'd still love one. I wouldn't have to worry about it, but it would be really handy.

    This may indicate a market for such a device. Not a PDA, not a full-on "outfitted for war" laptop, not a (god damned useless) e-reader, not a handheld gaming rig, but the space between.

    This is the space for essentialy a portable, truly open device that will let us surf the web, and run shells, and edit text files or to-do lists, but that won't break us financially if it's snatched from us on the subway.

    MIT is showing us the market, and they're refusing to compete! Why have none of us embraced this yet?

    My formula would be a Gumstix and an eInk display, maybe? Anyone have any better ideas?

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can already buy such a thing (sort of). The psion 5 - a tiny computer that uses 2xAA cells that last an order of magnitude longer than my old laptop batteries used to. Although they were tiny, you really could touch type on them.

      My question about this new computer is simple: what's the keyboard like.

      I buy laptops based on the keyboard and screen quality. Large hard disks; fast processors - they're nice but they take 2nd place

    2. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by Jerf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And we all want one for $100, and we'd all gladly pay up to $400 for one.... MIT is showing us the market, and they're refusing to compete!

      I really don't understand this. "We don't want to sell 'first-worlders' these laptops for $100." I sort of understand, if they're taking a loss. But why not sell them for $249*, and advertise that all profits go to subsidize further development and deployment of these laptops in their intended role?

      The other reason to do it this way is that you really ought to get these laptops in the hands of "first world" open source developers and users, so they can start working on making these things even more useful. Since you really can't target just "open source developers", you need to let them out to everyone. (Besides, open source communities are generally robust in proportion to the number of people in them, because developers are attracted to larger population communities for a lot of reasons. You can't just magically create a developer-only community of any size.) Hopefully someday the intended users will be able to help, but that will take a while because first they've got to work their way up to "computer literacy" before they're going to be developing.

      (*: If $249 would not itself be a profitable price point, then the $100 laptop project has failed in the $100 goal. A $1000 laptop is $100 with a $900 loss/subsidy, but who cares?)

    3. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by asherh · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the Psion 7: http://newth.net/psion7/index.html

      Excellent keyboard, colour screen, runs for ages on a charge, fast and lightweight EPOC operating system. Now discontinued. :-(

    4. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And we all want one for $100, and we'd all gladly pay up to $400 for one. I've got a PowerBook, and I'd still love one. I wouldn't have to worry about it, but it would be really handy.

      *ahem* Please speak for yourself, monkeyboy. I would pay no more than $200 for one, and I'm sure I'll be able to get one off ebay for that price only a few months after people start buying them. I frankly cannot afford more than that. (And before you ask, all my "disposable" income has been going to automotive maintenance for a while now, my car is 25 years old... easy to say I should get something newer but I can't afford to save money to buy another one right now, either.)

      I'll wait until they are available, one way or another, for $200. They would probably get an order of magnitude more orders for them if they were $200 and it would probably result in a whole hell of a lot more free computers heading to the third world. All those people willing to pay $400 for one would probably buy two at $200 instead of one at $300; they would still be providing two free to the third world. Meanwhile, those of us who would buy one at $200 but zero at $300 are providing zero computers to impoverished children.

      Maybe they've done the math on this and decided that $300 is the magical price point but personally I think anyone who buys these at this price for any reason other than philanthropy is a fucking moron. You can get a used laptop with a hard drive and a bigger screen for less money. I like to help people, but I like to help myself too, and I'm not going to spend $200 buying computers for kids in the third world when I could easily spend many times that on just restoring my car to something like factory condition in terms of function, let alone making cosmetic or performance improvements.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by asuffield · · Score: 1

      This may indicate a market for such a device. Not a PDA, not a full-on "outfitted for war" laptop, not a (god damned useless) e-reader, not a handheld gaming rig, but the space between.

      MIT is showing us the market, and they're refusing to compete! Why have none of us embraced this yet?

      Because it's the space in between. Anybody experienced in business will tell you one thing for free:

      Never attempt to sell to the middle of a market.

      It just doesn't work. Your product will be the very definition of mediocre. Some people will buy it, but most people will migrate towards one of the ends instead. In business, it is necessary for you to differentiate your product by being the best at something - basically either price or quality, although there are variations in specific forms of both.

    6. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by RexRhino · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because the project is based on socialist ideology. The idea that by selling these on the free market you can drive the costs down to make them more affordable is too "market oriented". When you purchase the thing for 3 times the cost, it is really more of a donation than a market transaction, and so hasn't been "tainted" with "capitalism".

    7. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

      From an earlier post: http://www.pledgebank.com/100laptop

      --
      No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    8. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by adrenalinerush · · Score: 1
      It's a question of getting the most units possible to the 3rd world. I don't know what sort of manufacturing scale they're going for, but if they are capacity-limited (i.e., demand outstrips supply) then it doesn't matter if we rich 1st-world citizens are willing to pay $250 apiece to subsidize the project. If supply is outpacing 3rd-world demand, every laptop sold to a 1st worlder is a laptop not sent to the developing world.

      Maybe they could implement a system where a limited number of them get sold to developers without restrictions on location. I can definitely see waiting lists for these.

      Granted, if they can make them much faster than they can sell them in the 3rd world, then of course it makes sense to sell them to rich(er) people at a higher price, and use those profits to subsidize further distribution in the 3rd world.

    9. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the main problem is that of mass production and didtribution. By offering to sell them to first-world customers now, then there will not be enough to fill the first shipment orders. Also, until mass production starts in a truly massive scale, then selling them to first-world customers at a higher price, but not having enough to ship to the areas where they are needed, could be seen as very poor practice. They would be raking in the money without actually doing what they promised. Sure, it is a good idea to sell these things everywhere (I would like one [at least]), but this should only be considered when there are enough to go around.

    10. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I really don't understand this. "We don't want to sell 'first-worlders' these laptops for $100." I sort of understand, if they're taking a loss. But why not sell them for $249*, and advertise that all profits go to subsidize further development and deployment of these laptops in their intended role?
      It's vintage Negroponte - philoposphy uber alles. Real world considerations need not apply.
    11. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you miss the point, this is best at meeting MY needs, and by the looks of it, alot of people on /. .

    12. Re:For the cheap-arsed geeks out there by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make sense. If you can make them for $100, and sell them for $249 (as the GP suggests), you can probably afford to ramp up production, which typically lowers the unit cost, allowing you to make more. Startups would kill for this kind of product - one with a clear demand that will get the production line up and running. Give up the moral high ground and make a difference with the idea.

      If there is too much demand from the "first" world, sell them auction style - one free market sale for every two sent to the "third" world. Would you pay $300, or $327, or $402? You might suggest limiting the sales to 1/3 of stock at $249, but that just means ebayers will take the cash from resales and buy more pot. Might as well put that money back in the coffers to make more laptops.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  42. slashdot effect by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

    This is a good one to slashdot. No, I don't mean kill the server with our traffic, but increase the number of pledges. I think I can see the beginnings of /. effect already. The fag end of the graph looks nearly vertical.

    --
    I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    1. Re:slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The fag end of the graph looks nearly vertical.
      Just what are you insinuating about Slashdotters?
  43. usefull addition by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

    Collecting relatively old USB HD to give one with 10-20 of those laptops will be usefull. 512MB of storage can be OK, but only if backed up by a shared storage (that they also could use as a public library).

  44. Excellent response by ylikone · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wow, that was great! Mod up!

    --
    Meh.
  45. Wait?! by weremook · · Score: 1

    I don't see how this fights terrorism.

    1. Re:Wait?! by linvir · · Score: 1

      And worse, it'll only feed the child porn problem! Won't somebody please think of the children?

    2. Re:Wait?! by carlislematthew · · Score: 1

      Totally. And how does it decrease the price of gasoline??!!

  46. One condition... by bradgoodman · · Score: 0
    Alright, alright...I'll donate, but only in one condition.

    We get a promise in writing that we'll never see a T.V. commercial with Sally Struthers whining about poor kids with no laptops...

  47. Sign me up by Demerara · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's better to light a candle than to sit and curse the darkness.

    --
    Backward%20compatibility%20is%20over-rated
    1. Re:Sign me up by Istrancis · · Score: 1

      I have to say that I really agree, that proverb is so true.

    2. Re:Sign me up by Kirth+Gersen · · Score: 1
      It's better to light a candle than to sit and curse the darkness.


      Yeah, like the Tom and Jerry cartoon where Tom is in the dark and tries to light a candle, only to discover Jerry has stealthily substituted a firecracker...
  48. FOOT POWERED by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

    They recently made the announcement that they will have some sort of pedal rather than a hand crank.

    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
  49. Re:Cheaper? by Limburgher · · Score: 1

    What's cheaper about CentOS than Fedora? They're both free as in speech and as in beer.

    --

    You are not the customer.

  50. Re:Cheaper? by mh101 · · Score: 1

    Why would that make a difference? They're both freely downloadable.

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  51. $100 laptop and population growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if $100 laptop finally will be the thing that will curb population growth is Africa?

  52. Not Hand Powered by timeOday · · Score: 4, Informative
    At least according to this:
    As initially envisioned, the laptops sported a hand crank on the side to generate power, but Negroponte has scrapped that idea because the twisting forces that would be bad for the machine. Instead, some form of power generation device, likely a pedal, will be attached to the AC power adapter, he said.

    "I was the longest holdout for the crank being on the laptop. I was wrong," he said

    1. Re:Not Hand Powered by whoisnumber1 · · Score: 1

      I was the longest holdout for the crank being on the laptop.

      He must love Slashdot, then.

    2. Re:Not Hand Powered by DocLandolt · · Score: 1

      If this is the case, and they can spin off a truck-load of pedal-powered dynamos on the cheap, these could find all sorts of other uses -- charging a different laptop, a cell-phone, pda, etc...

      I think it's time we standardized DC power adapters, and the accessories this laptop brings to market could help.

  53. Sell the OS! by courtarro · · Score: 1

    Native wifi support for only $100? It's about time! Toss the laptop and keep the OS!

  54. There is a huge difference by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    It is like the homeless newspaper. I can just give them some money BUT that would be begging and charity. Selling and buying the newspaper is just business. I get something real for my money. The stories are usually pretty good if a bit too leftie for my taste (if you read a homeless guy whining about all those suits being locked in their daily grind I don't see why I should then give him my money afterall, he should pay me, the poor prisoner of the system).

    300 dollars for a laptop ain't much especially an open one. Especially a cute one!

    Also this one seems to be small. And if the stories of the handcrank are true then they are 100% perfect.

    I don't need number grinding, I need something wich just bloody works. It being cute enough to attract girls is just a bonus.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  55. Re:Cheaper? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    So I guess the less obnoxious version of your comment would be "because $100 computer users don't need an enterprise OS, just a personal one".

    OTOH, users of such puny computers have even more improvement than most in combining the power of multiple computers into a networked enterprise.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  56. BSD by Catskul · · Score: 5, Funny

    In that red/orange color and with those ears/horns, it kina makes me think it should be running bsd.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  57. Quite different by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    There are actually at least four different design concepts for this marvelous project.
    So the one shown by Peter is just one.
    I think that the crank operated recharger is an important feature that the orange design is missing.

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  58. Arggghhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did it ever occur to you, that maybe, just maybe, all those bright people involved with this project were aware of the fact that fedora proper would be too heavy for these machines and that for this very reason they developed and now use a heavily modified fedora version?

  59. Internetcafes by Twisted+Mind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think internet shops are of much greater use to very poor countries/people than these laptops.
    The laptops would still be broken or stolen quite fast. Also, without an internet connection and printer they would be of little use.

    Internetshops with a good/fast internet connection and a low hourly rate are of much greater use imho. It would be a lot better if every village had one or two computers with a fast (wireless) connection, that the entire village can use.

    --
    (-% TwistedMind %-)
    1. Re:Internetcafes by carlislematthew · · Score: 1
      So a small, rural village in Keplakistan that has a few huts is going to open an Internet Cafe? I can just see them all sipping lattes and bitching about gas prices while munching on a lemon bar.

      Computers were around with an internet connection for decades and they certainly were of use. Software was delivered on CD, or floppy disk. Maybe they *will* have access to the Internet somehow, but I think it's just as reasonable to expect that they will share files/software in a more physical way. My friends and I used to trade floppy disks all the time to share stuff. Maybe USB Flash is the medium for this?

    2. Re:Internetcafes by Twisted+Mind · · Score: 1

      I think, rather than donating money for a computer, we can rather donate money for internet cafes.

      I worked with floppies a lot too, but for most people that isn't very usuable. Remember, that before the internet computers were much less used. Most non-tech people either didn't have a computer or only used for tekst-writing or playing games.

      --
      (-% TwistedMind %-)
    3. Re:Internetcafes by alienw · · Score: 1

      So a small, rural village in Keplakistan that has a few huts is going to open an Internet Cafe?

      Yes. Usually it's just a room with computers and a network connection, that can be used for a nominal hourly fee. These exist and work quite well.

  60. It amazes me too by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How people like you keep not getting it.

    This isn't for areas where people are starving. This is for areas where people have food but now need to advance to the next level. Education is the only tool to prevent people from collapsing to starvation again.

    Why PC's instead of books. Because 1 internet capable pc can contain all the books in the world in their most recent version with an infinite amount of paper and pencil.

    Books are expenive as hell, ask any student, and schools in poor countries often got to work with hopelessly outdated material and practice books that gotta be reused time and time again.

    Cheap PC's make sense, not in starvation areas but in those countries were the basic needs have been taken care off and now education is the most pressing concern.

    Because hopefully educated people will be more concerned with creating a better world and not with waging war on each other. Right?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:It amazes me too by mrogers · · Score: 1
      Because hopefully educated people will be more concerned with creating a better world and not with waging war on each other.

      Shame they won't be distributing these laptops in the US and UK.

    2. Re:It amazes me too by dwayner79 · · Score: 1

      According to the article, they will in Mass.

      --
      Religion and politics, without the flame. godgab.org
    3. Re:It amazes me too by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This isn't for areas where people are starving. This is for areas where people have food but now need to advance to the next level. Education is the only tool to prevent people from collapsing to starvation again.

      You don't get it either. This device isn't just for people who are well-fed! Or at least, it damned well shouldn't be. Access to information and communications can provide people with information they need to properly distribute food, for one; it can also tell them how to better preserve food, or where to find it, or how to grow it.

      Education is our only hope, like ol' Ben Kenobi. Nothing else can save us, as a species.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:It amazes me too by demachina · · Score: 1

      "Because hopefully educated people will be more concerned with creating a better world and not with waging war on each other. Right?"

      In a word, NO! When Europeans came to the new world they were certainly better educated than the natives. Did they come in peace? No most came with superior weaponry due to their superior education and knowledge and proceeded to kill, enslave, plunder and ethnically cleanse the poorly educated and technologically inferior natives.

      The two people running the U.S. executive branch are extremely well educated. The President had a prep school education, graduated Yale and then Harvard MBA. Now granted he was mostly partying and coasting on his family's influence during that education, and he in fact seems to have mush for brains and got nothing out of his education, but he is "educated" and he was so fond of the idea of war he launched several at his first opportunity much to the detriment of the world in at least one case.

      So it is my contention that people who naively claim that "education == better people" are way off the mark. You can twist an education system in to creating Spartans and Nazi's who live for war and killing. The nature of the education is everything.

      Giving kids networked laptops doesn't insure they will grow up to be saints and Einsteins. It does give them a better shot at being better people, a shot they make take advantage of or they may squander. They may be freed from some of their isolation and have better access to knowledge and a diversity of viewpoints but they may well pick viewpoints they find on the Internet that most people would consider negative. They may use their computers to learn, they may use them to look at porn or create new Nigerian email scams.

      There are three aspects to education here:

      - Enabling learning, which this project may offer especially in concert with networking and hopefully the network reaches the Internet
      - Direction, which this project may not offer since I don't think there are teachers or curricula attached at least in some cases
      - Self control and self motivation which depends on the heart, mind and life history of each individual kid

      Chances are these laptops may help nurture both monsters and shining stars. Hopefully the number and impact of the shining stars will outweigh the monsters.

      --
      @de_machina
    5. Re:It amazes me too by hawks5999 · · Score: 1
      Because 1 internet capable pc can contain all the books in the world in their most recent version with an infinite amount of paper and pencil.
      Or at least 9375 books including the one "geek referenced" above.
  61. Re:Cheaper? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I could have phrased my premise more clearly. CentOS, the enterprise version, is better for combining the low-powered machines into a more powerful network.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  62. the correct screen size is... by 1800maxim · · Score: 1

    It has a 7-inch screen, according to wikipedia.

    What will that run, 640x480?

  63. 4 colors by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Informative
    4 colors and 4 models if you look closely. Orange/red, Yellow/orange, blue and green. The models with orange are different in the plastic around the screen (one seems to lack speaker and leds)

    Green wins by the way. Not only does it miss the hump of the blue one but it got Neko ears instead of bunny ears. Neko for the win!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:4 colors by AnalystX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wouldn't that make it five colors (Orange, Red, Yellow, Blue, Green) and four models if we were to be picky about it?

    2. Re:4 colors by fanblade · · Score: 1

      They ALL win. Seriously, you KNOW this is great design if there are hundreds of /. comments about it and virtually no bitching. Great job on ALL models.

    3. Re:4 colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a "neko"? And why must everyone end everything they write with "* for the win!"? It's stupid.

    4. Re:4 colors by slowbad · · Score: 1

      So I've got to buy 12 of these to end up with one of each for myself? I'll do it!

  64. Donations by stangy · · Score: 0

    This is nice and all but if you want to donate $200 do it here:

    http://www.redcross.org/donate/donate.html

  65. Donating isn't such a bad idea by ursabear · · Score: 1

    Getting computers in the hands of the many in under-developed countries doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me, IMVHO. If indeed it takes off, and these are delivered en-masse to kids in outbound places, it will be a good thing. If only a few kids get to break a cycle of poverty (obviously, lots more are desirable, but I'm speaking of "at least" here...), the program would seem to have been worth it.

    I love the Apple stickers all over the meeting attendees' laptops (not the $100 laptops) in the pictures. Product placement maybe? [giggles]

  66. Upgrades by jj00 · · Score: 1

    I see lots of stuff about power consumption, but I see nothing about scalability. Poor is a relative term, and while some places really have to worry about power, other places do not. For example, if they "ramp-down" the wifi (according to wikipedia) to fit within a certain power scheme, then they should allow you to scale it back up if you want.

    The same could be said for the RAM and hard drive ( just a flash drive). This device could provide a base for a entry laptop that you could upgrade if you wanted.

    If they did all this, then more power to them (no pun intended). I just haven't seen anything about it.

  67. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why CentOS? Do you think third-world children need clustering? Perhaps MySQL? Oh, now I know, they must need squirrelmail+cyrus-sasl+IMAP. Yeah.
    How about just leaving your bias at home? CentOS is a great OS if you need a server that is basically identical to RHEL but free. Fedora is for desktops and is free. CentOS is basically the Fedora for servers, and it is also free. What benefit do you expect to derive from using CentOS, other than bloat? Strip out all the default packages from both and you will be left with an almost identical OS anyway.

  68. Speak 'N Spell by ToxikFetus · · Score: 1

    Did they just dig an old Speak 'N Spell out of a closet, dust it off, and throw in a cheapo modern CPU? That thing is hideous.

  69. Thanks by dwayner79 · · Score: 1

    Of all the comments so far, I like yours the best, so I will respond here.

    It makes a lot of sense for countries that need education for this project. I can defintely see the benefits to it. You are right that handouts only make a system worse.

    Thanks for you replies.

    --
    Religion and politics, without the flame. godgab.org
  70. dang touchpads by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    I hate those things.

    I'd rather have an IBM/Dell style "pointing stick" in the middle of the keyboard......if it had one of those I'd probably be sold on it right now.

    anybody know what the tech specs are on it?

    --

    Question everything

  71. Re:Cheaper? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    They're both free, but CentOS is an enterprise version. Cheap machines get more benefit from enterprise scale integration, compensating for low power with higher scales.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  72. Spam Not Limited By Hardware, Limited By Net by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Spam is not limited by number of boxes or processing power. You can get either of those for quite cheap on specialham.com, from your favorite broker of zombified PCs. The trick is getting proxies or servers with IP addresses that aren't already on all the blacklists. Since these laptops don't come with an Internet connection (merely connectivity), they no more increase the spam threat than Intel introducing a faster CPU does (yay, thats more unique spam messages you can generate that get /dev/null'ed because your machine is blacklisted).

  73. Re:Cheaper? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Why would a 9 year old need a DARPANet?

    I'm biased in favor of cheap little machines in poor people's hands combining together to get power. Which poor people are often better able to do than people with more money to spend, bringing working techniques for collaboration out of the streets and into the network.

    CentOS is the enterprise version that lets little desktops combine for that kind of power. Fedora is the desktop version that leaves puny desktops isolated and puny.

    Anonymous sarcastic Coward, examine your own bias before you dismiss the chance to learn from the actual answers to your assumed rhetorical questions.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  74. ... donated two to children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like George Carlin says:

    FUCK THE CHILDREN!

    1. Re:... donated two to children? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Know what? I agree.
      Not entirely of course, I mean sure, education, third world and stuff. But if I can get one for $300, I really don't care if 2/3 of that goes to fund education or nukes or terrorism, I just want one.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  75. Got to have one by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    The day these things become available, they will immediately be the coolest computers on the planet. I'd buy several at 300-500 if the overcharge was going to pay for a few computers to poor people. This is a terrific idea. Anybody who's looking for faults in this program has zero soul. Steve Jobs made the offer of OSX just to get his name associated with the project. If a $100 laptop that actually ran OSX ever hit the world, Apple would lose a ton of revenue. A computer with a crank? It sounds like everything I need in a laptop. When I want to play Far Cry, I use my supercharged desktop. I'm a little bit creeped out by the fact that Negroponte is doing this great deed for mankind while his brother is setting up secret prisons and torturing people, but I guess we can't pick our family.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Got to have one by The_Isle_of_Mark · · Score: 1

      Good job setting up the bait for the parting shot. Jump on four bandwagons at one time!

  76. I have some relevant experience here by gardenermike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In a couple of months, I am actually moving to an orphange in Africa. (Note to other telecommuters out there: get out there and make a difference!) Some people have questioned whether or not the computers are really a good idea for the kids. Well, the director of the orphanage has asked for only two things besides the volunteer work we offered: clothing and used computers. Suppose you're 10 years old and you have food. What else do you need? Well, shelter. Next, education. I think this is great.

  77. Re:25 Anniversary Mac? by captjc · · Score: 1

    awesome pic...

    25 Anniv. Mac, but cooler looking.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  78. Check out OpenCourseWare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MIT has another initiative that is trying to address the guide part of this. You should check out MIT's OpenCourseWare. This is another part of this solution that dovetails nicely with the laptop project. It's a website with all the MIT course materials made freely available. They have also received a donation of hard drives to supply mirrors of the site to places like Africa.

  79. pledgebank slashdotted by cyberbian · · Score: 1

    oops... now they see exactly how behind this idea we TRULY are! wtg MIT, Negroponte et al!!! thanks for hope for humanity! enable the people to help themselves!! Negroponte for president!

    --
    if I claimed I was emperor just because some watery tart lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away!
  80. Mod Funny Parent Up Please! by gurutc · · Score: 1

    Snorted a granola bar through my 2 meganostrils on that one.

    --
    Moderation in All Things... Especially Moderation - gurutc
  81. I know 3 people that would... by enjahova · · Score: 1

    I used to have a 12" powerbook that I was borrowing from my dad. 3 of my friends asked me if I was going to sell it when I got my new computer. All 3 just wanted simple web browsing/word processing, they liked the small smooth form factor of the apple, and none of them had much computer experience at all.

    $300 for a laptop, and they just need to buy a nice little external harddrive and they would be set. I think this is the perfect thing for a lot of people who do not know anything about pentium 1s or damn small linux, and I don't have time/energy to set up something like that for each of them. Hell if I had just a little bit more disposable income I would totally buy one of these!

    --
    "how can they call it a MINE if everything here is THEIRS?!?!" -Straight Jacket
  82. Does america need more people with computers by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Does america need more people with computers and intnet access? After all do we really need more idiots who fall for stupid scams?

    Another post, insane one, commented about how these machines would be used for spam. Right. Well spam and scams are there for one reason only, because people fall for them.

    Don't hate the spammers/scammers, hate their victims. Really if you transfer a small fortune to someone for helping them send you millions I can do nothing but laugh. Fools and their money should be seperated as soon as possible.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Does america need more people with computers by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Don't hate the spammers/scammers, hate their victims. Really if you transfer a small fortune to someone for helping them send you millions I can do nothing but laugh. Fools and their money should be seperated as soon as possible. Ohhh....so THAT's why all the money went missing from my bank account...

  83. Just Curious........ by SkyDude · · Score: 1

    When one of these toys gets destroyed by a child, who pays for the repairs or replacements? Or, is it decided that the kid only gets one at the $100 price?

    See, having kids of my own and having a wife that's a teacher has taught me that kids don't take care of their things. Maybe in countries where the kids have little in the way of material goods, they will do better, but in the US, I suspect more than a few of these will be out for curbside collection within a few months of the initial distribution.

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  84. Mostly China and India? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Everyone talks about poor African children benefiting from these devices, but that is not what I see when I look at the distro map. Only Nigeria and Egypt are "green".

    What really sticks out is China and India - seems to me, with all the bitching on Slashdot about outsourcing from the West to those places, China and India ought to be on their own in funding this program.

    If I were to pledge is there any way to be chose the recipient country?

    If the laptops are donated proportionally based on population, almost all of them will be going to one of those two countries...

    Sounds like a great deal for China - get paid to manufacture them, then have them donated to their citizens too!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Mostly China and India? by AoT · · Score: 1

      China and India alone make up for one third of the world's population, and they have relatively stable political and social situations. I am quite sure that this is the reason that some countries are being targeted and other not. That and, as others have said, this computer won't help so much in a war torn african country where people have other, more pressing problems about which to worry.

  85. Software development by DebbaDog · · Score: 1

    Hardware is cool, but what about software? What, if any, tools/languages/whatever will be available to develop apps for this laptop?

  86. Re:Even Better!!! by captjc · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of my computer. It is a 2 year old cheap Compaq Presario with a Taped on Apple Sticker (Old Rainbow logo, circa 1995). Yet some people still think I have an iBook.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  87. Fisher Price by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I think MIT is hoping Fisher Price will call and label this "My First Laptop".

    So the big question is, does it cost $100 to make? Of did they just make it look like a $100 laptop?

    Hopefully Leap Frog is looking at this and might come out with their own version before Christmas for $50.

    In all honestly, I still don't see the reason for this laptop, especially since they are gearing it towards 3rd world countries. I have always said, and I stand by it, that these people need access to clean drinking watter, food, and medicine before they need the luxury of internet access. Even as an educational tool, this laptop is pointless as I am sure any kid or parent would hawk this thing in the local flea market in order to get enough money to pay the rent and/or just pay for food.

    I can see this being ideal in G8 countries. Kids living below the poverty line still should be able to access the top rate schools in those countries, but without being able to afford a computer and thus the tools and technologies that could give them an edge, they fail to be recognized or qualify for scholarships and grants that could allow them to turn their life around.

    But I just don't see some child in Ethiopia ever having the same access to education that even the poorest in America has. A laptop isn't going to turn this child in Ethiopia into a doctor or a MIT engineer. There are easier and more ideal ways to ensure this child will be able to read and write and have enough understanding of life in order to hopefully get a decent job to provide for his/her family, but a computer isn't one of those ways.

    This is a pipe-dream (most likely literally) by some university students that have this rosy idealistic view of the world that maturity and experience eventually dashes. Its still a novel concept and something that will make computer more ubiquitous and offer more people a chance to gain technological skills, but this isn't going to change the state of affairs in most 3rd world countries. Without the basic infrastructure in place in these countries to provide basics like food, medicine and water, how can one expect to target a luxury device like a computer with internet access?

    In the end, this will become a novelty item branded by Fisher Price or Leap Frog and sold at Walmart in the toy section.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:Fisher Price by vidarh · · Score: 1
      So the big question is, does it cost $100 to make? Of did they just make it look like a $100 laptop?

      Last I heard it cost MORE than $100 to make. They are hoping the costs will drop below $100 pretty quickly.

      In all honestly, I still don't see the reason for this laptop, especially since they are gearing it towards 3rd world countries. I have always said, and I stand by it, that these people need access to clean drinking watter, food, and medicine before they need the luxury of internet access. Even as an educational tool, this laptop is pointless as I am sure any kid or parent would hawk this thing in the local flea market in order to get enough money to pay the rent and/or just pay for food.

      The third world is more than countries where most people are starving. There are hundreds of millions of people out there who have clean water, food and medicine, but who are still poor and have a hard time improving their lives. As India is a great example of, investing in education has a huge impact in terms of helping people improve their own lives.

      And while it's all nice and well to help people get access to clean drinking water, food and medicine, unless these people get help to get an education for their children, their children are going to grow up to be in just the same position as their parents, dependent on foreign aid just to survive.

      Solving the poverty problem is about more than solving basic needs - it also requires an investment in making it easier for people to improve their own lives.

      I can see this being ideal in G8 countries. Kids living below the poverty line still should be able to access the top rate schools in those countries, but without being able to afford a computer and thus the tools and technologies that could give them an edge, they fail to be recognized or qualify for scholarships and grants that could allow them to turn their life around.

      True, there are certainly people in rich countries who could benefit from this too, and nothing is stopping G8 governments from buying these for parts of their own populations.

      But I just don't see some child in Ethiopia ever having the same access to education that even the poorest in America has.

      There are lots of children in Ethiopia that HAS far better access to education than the poorest in USA has, as there is throughout the developing countries. Education is available - as you'll see from the number of people from third world countries attending even expensive US and European universities. The third world isn't all starving people in mud huts - it's a vastly diverse set of countries with huge differences in overall wealth and size of their middle and upper classes and vastly diverse educational systems, ranging from countries where most children don't even get primary school to countries where most people have access to high quality universities (like Cuba...)

      A laptop isn't going to turn this child in Ethiopia into a doctor or a MIT engineer. There are easier and more ideal ways to ensure this child will be able to read and write and have enough understanding of life in order to hopefully get a decent job to provide for his/her family, but a computer isn't one of those ways.

      Perhaps the child in Ethiopia won't, but what about a child in Mexico, for instance? And even if the child in Ethiopia doesn't become a doctor or a MIT engineer, if that child gets an opportunity to learn to read, and to learn to use the internet to look up agricultural information and weather forecasts, or quickly check the prices his family can get for their produce in the various surrounding cities, that is enough to potentially improve his familys life immensely.

      All over Africa and the rest of the world there are millions of impoverished people already that have had their lives transformed by access to cellphones and the internet because it has helped streamline the businesses their lives depend on in ways that we'd never think about. So

  88. We could have gave one to every human on earth ... by cpu_fusion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... for the cost of the Iraq war.

  89. Hardware specs by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 2, Informative

    The USD 100 laptop hardware specs can be found here for the sake of completeness.

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  90. Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is going to support these rigs in the field?

  91. Dont roll in cash - you don't know where it's been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love to donate some of these to needy children! Once Sally Struthers figures out she CAN'T eat these then they probably WILL get to the children.

  92. That's a Speak'n Spell in steroids :) by stm2 · · Score: 1

    The red and yellow model resemble the old Speak'n Spell. Here is a picture: http://atlanta.metblogs.com/archives/images/2005/1 1/speak_spell.JPG

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  93. Crank moved to AC Adaptor by remedy1998 · · Score: 1

    The crank still exists, but it has been moved to the AC adaptor and will no longer be on the main unit.

  94. Caps Lock by fossa · · Score: 1

    Neat. Definitely considering buying/donating. Selfish question: I can't tell from the photographs, but can we please please please have a Unix keyboard with Control key to the left of the left pinky and the escape key to the left of the numerals, rather than up with the function keys?

  95. Pledgebank legit? by cmacb · · Score: 1

    That pledgebank thing seems to be /.ed, but has anyone verified that it is even legit? The OLPC pages from what I've found all say that they are still investigating the possibility of making these things available to the general public. How do I know that pledgebank isn't just a spam mailing list (or worse), what information do they ask for?

    I saw Pledgebank mentioned on the Flickr page (as a comment) but I see no direct linkage with the project. Did the /. editors do any verification on this (not that they don't always do excellent pre-publication research!)?

  96. Finally third world countries get p0rn!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About time!

  97. Software! by grimborg · · Score: 1

    Why, the cranks are implemented in software of course. With a budget of only $100 there's really no room for any of that hardware-based crank nonsense.

    BTW, are these laptops only for old people or what?

  98. Don't quote so selectively by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    You quoted The solution to AIDS is obvious. Abstinence is guaranteed to be effective as if to imply he thinks abstinence is the only solution, conveniently leaving off the rest of what he said: Condoms help a lot. There is no magic drug that will make people practice either of these which shows he is not the Nacy Reagan Just Say No type at all.

    If you would focus on what he said, not what you wanted to read, you would realize he is not talking about 100% AIDS prevention, but only the part that can be controlled thru personal behavioral changes. Sure condoms don't always work, but they are good enough to put a huge dent in AIDS victims, if they would only be used.

    Besides which, yes, abstinence is 100% effective, for that segment of AIDS causes that it applies to. Certainly there are other sources of AIDS, but we don't let known murderers get awy with it just because there are others we don't catch.

    1. Re:Don't quote so selectively by PaladinAlpha · · Score: 1

      No, he said, Abstinence is guaranteed to be effective (implied: in the prevention of AIDS) -- and it's NOT guaranteed to be effective, because it doesn't affect all forms of AIDS transmission. That is the point that I suspect that was trying to be made. Regardless of political standpoint of either party it's a simply incorrect statement, and, indeed, if anything reinforces the statement before it, because AIDS -can't- be controlled on a personal level by personal behavioral factors -- one's environment and society is always a risk.

      A way to put out fires would be more useful than a high-horse "oh, let's just not have fires" attitude if liver transplants caused fires randomly when performed by people without access to all of the technology that we have access to AND STILL SOMETIMES DON'T USE.

      That kind of holier-than-thou thinking could apply to almost any medical problem. "If people with the flu would stay inside we wouldn't need flu medication; it wouldn't spread." "If people wouldn't break bones we wouldn't need a means of setting them."

      To the originally quoted post: grow up, get your head out of your ass, and start worrying about helping people instead of looking down your nose at them thinking they're going to "respect" you for your ability to "stick to your morals," or, in reality, be a total jerk. I'm all for morals. I'm also all for helping people who are doing the best they can.

      To the person I'm replying to, sorry, got carried away, I guess.

    2. Re:Don't quote so selectively by Clod9 · · Score: 1
      > AIDS -can't- be controlled on a personal level by personal behavioral factors -- one's environment and society is always a risk.

      Your personal behavior has a huge effect on your risk of getting AIDS. The other risks are infinitesmal in comparison. Sure, you can contract it through lots of different vectors, but if you and your partner are monogamous and you don't use intravenous needles, the chances of being infected with HIV are vanishingly small. I think that's the point he was trying to make -- AIDS is easily controlled through behavior, if people knew the facts and behaved appropriately.

      As for spreading the flu (your example), we have manners (cover your mouth when you sneeze, wash your hands often, use your sick days when you know you're contagious) that have developed over many decades to help control its spread. These are very effective practices, and we need similarly effective practices based in FACT to be adopted by people worldwide to control the spread of AIDS. Instead, we have people like Jacob Zuma doing all the wrong things. He's not the only one, by far.

      It is a fact that if all people everywhere practiced monogamous sex and did not share needles, AIDS would not be a big problem in this world. It would devastate the lives of a very few people affected by it, like SARS, but the vast majority of the world would only read about it in newspapers. Even if we started now, we could almost completely eradicate it within a few generations, without any dollar cost. That won't happen, I know. People enjoy their sexual practices too much, and don't think about the future. But if ten thousand African males could read the news about Zuma, learn how HIV infection works, and make better choices, that would have a real effect. It's ALL about behavior, and behavior can be influenced by education.

  99. Re:Cheaper? by linvir · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ha, a lot of people have made the same point as me by now. We're all vigilant for posts like your original one, because it's an ego boost when we get to say things like that. I think I believe you that your point was more complex than what you presented it as, but I'm amazed that you didn't foresee these smartassed rebuttals and make your point more clear in the first place.

  100. Question about keyboard by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't quite make out the keyboards, but they look vaguely like the common English (American?) keyboard. This is reasonable for a prototype built at MIT, but not appropriate for most of the intended recipients. I haven't read anything about this, and google doesn't seem to know anything, either.

    So what's the plan for including appropriate keyboards? Special keyboards for each locale, that only work there? Some scheme for a general-purpose keyboard that can be easily be used by children who speak/read/write Macedonian or Greek or Arabic or Cantonese or Mongolian or ...?

    I'd really be interested in the latter. I've been trying to develop "internationalized" stuff, and I've found that information about how to enter the above language on my keyboard is pretty much impossible to find.

    Of course, this could be because I'm in the US, where vendors see no reason to provide any help for any language other than English.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:Question about keyboard by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1

      I can't quite make out the keyboards, but they look vaguely like the common English (American?) keyboard. This is reasonable for a prototype built at MIT, but not appropriate for most of the intended recipients ... So what's the plan for including appropriate keyboards? Special keyboards for each locale, that only work there? Some scheme for a general-purpose keyboard that can be easily be used by children who speak/read/write Macedonian or Greek or Arabic or Cantonese or Mongolian or ...?

      Macedonian (from FYRM) is written using the Cyrillic alphabet. Greek is written using the Greek alphabet, but I don't think this project is necessarily target at the Greeks. Cantonese or Mongolian cannot be efficiently placed on a keyboard, and most input methods use a Roman alphabet keyboard. The Roman alphabet is used throughout Central and South America, all of Sub-Sahara Africa (with the exception of Ethiopia and Sudan if you want to include them), Turkey, India, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia. That pretty much leaves the countries which use the Cyrillic alphabet and the Arabic script. The Cyrillic countries can use the Roman alphabet -- it's a little painful, but it's done commonly. That pretty much leaves the Arabic countries. Of course, this is ignoring accents and such used in languages using the Latin alphabet e.g. Portuguese, Spanish, French, and Vietnamese, but these can be omitted without too many problems; a solution such as dead keys could be implemented to rectify this if needed. In conclusion, a Roman alphabet keyboard should do fine for all countries with the exception of the Arabic script ones.

      P.S. Here is a map with all the countries which use the Roman alphabet.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    2. Re:Question about keyboard by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most international keyboards are minor derivations of the standard English 101 keyboard with different mappings for diacritical characters. How those mappings and the key labelling will be handled is a relevent point.

      Even double-byte languages like Chinese or Japanese can be easily done on English keyboards as the character's pronunciation is typed in roman letters and the space bar hit to bring up a list of charcaters matching that pronunication.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  101. Does anyone else think... by mds820 · · Score: 1

    ... that the $100 laptop looks like something made by Fischer Price?

  102. Jobs' offer was grandstanding by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OS X wouldn't even begin to fit on this laptop, and without having free source, not only could they not slim it down, they couldn't use it is part of the learning environment it is meant to provide. He knew the requirements, he knew OS X was useless, so his offer was nothing but grandstanding.

    1. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by speed_of_light · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that Jobs knowledge of Mac OS X isn't that deep: "OOOOH! Pretty buttons! I love candy!"

    2. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no stupidity greater than underestimating someone else's intelligence.

    3. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      OS X wouldn't even begin to fit on this laptop, and without having free source, not only could they not slim it down, they couldn't use it is part of the learning environment it is meant to provide. He knew the requirements, he knew OS X was useless, so his offer was nothing but grandstanding.

      I wouldn't call it grandstanding. Even if he knew that his offer would not be accepted, it's still a nice gesture. What more can Jobs do? I think that the solution used was a good one, Linux is the way to go in this space.

      --
      No Sigs!
    4. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that *is* grandstanding. It's like me (very publically) offering someone a kidney while knowing full well that our blood types are incompatible and it will be rejected.

    5. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      Dude...your anology is a little off. We're talking about Operating Systems here not kidney transplants and for one thing and for another thing in 2 or 3 years, these things should have more memory and cpu power to handle it. Ever heard of Moore's Law?

      --
      No Sigs!
    6. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Aside from the fact that OS X wouldn't run well on the target hardware - the BIG reason Jobs offer was refused was because they didn't want to impose proprietary non open source software constraints on any aspect of these laptops. They didn't want to make all these kids Apple's or Microsoft's customers. They wanted them to have access to easily extensible software with the code completely available.
      Any proprietary OS would have been contrary to the goals of the project.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    7. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1, Funny

      They didn't want to make all these kids Apple's or Microsoft's customers. They wanted them to have access to easily extensible software with the code completely available. Any proprietary OS would have been contrary to the goals of the project.

      Last time I checked OS X is based on BSD. Since BSD is open source, the kids would have access to the source.

      --
      No Sigs!
    8. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ugh. Look - the core of OS X is a BSD/Mach kernal. The primary "behind the scenes" OS functions are BSD. This is what is called Darwin and it is open source. The entire UI and graphics system (AKA Aqua) is proprietary.
      Darwin = open source. OSX != open source. Simple as that. If OSX were open source, we could compile and run it on any x86 we felt like - but legally WE CAN'T. Why? Because it ISN'T OPEN SOURCE.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    9. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked OS X is based on BSD. Since BSD is open source, the kids would have access to the source.

      You haven't checked for a while then.

      OS X as shipped on new macs has a closed source kernel & some bsd derived userland tools.

      Shipping XP + Services for Unix would give you a similar amount of open source.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    10. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Darwin = open source

      Not anymore :-( XNU is closed.

      Darwin = Open/closed hybrid.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    11. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing this back and forth. Articles saying it's closed, articles saying Apple says it isn't. At this point I'm totally confused on the issue.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    12. Re:Jobs' offer was grandstanding by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      At this point I'm totally confused on the issue.

      Essentially, Apple hasn't released the sources to the kernel for darwin x86. Noone's really disputing this, but Apple hasn't commented on why, leading many people to speculate that they'll be opened in future.

      So basically, we've got a closed kernel, closed gui & some open userland. Install services for unix on XP & you have a similar experience. :-/

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  103. Makes you wonder by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    What does he tell his girlfriend?

  104. China will have the world's biggest economy soon by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    Do you want the next generation of rural kids to grow up thinking that we were nice for buying them laptops and giving them more educational opportunities?
    Or do you want them to not know, and remain under the Party control, without knowledge of what else is out there?

    Right now a large number of rural kids in China don't even go to school. They used to, back before Westernization these last few years. But the government no longer pays for it, and the parents in rural communities can't pay the fees - less than 1 cent US per year, according to the recent Frontline documentary "Tank Man." So what makes you think their government is going to find money for $100 per child, when they can't find 1 cent per year?

  105. Serious concerns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what it is the point of giving away computers to the needy when content owners/providers are hell bent on charging for everything. Fine the laptop might be a great learning tool - but only if it has access to educational content that no doubt will come with a price tag.

    And what happens a few years down the line when the machine is hopelessly out of date and completely incapable of doing anything but the very basic task, for the simple reason it can't interact with newer technology.

    AC because I have too many passwords to remember.

  106. 1 cent a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If that is true, your REALLY shouldn't waste $100 on a laptop - you can send 10,000 kids to school for a year!

    What makes you think any donated laptops in China won't be labled "provided to you by your local party commitee?"

  107. Looks like Fisher Price crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been selling complete 486 systems for $99 for years. Full keyboard, mouse, and monitor, and minitower case with a real 640 mb harddrive and a real OS. Keep more computer junk out of the land fill that's already been made, rather than making more junk.

    No self respecting kid would be caught dead seen with one of these things. Where's the pointer on it I wonder and string, so when you pull it it says "and the cow says... mooo! and the dog says... bark bark!"

  108. Flamebait? Unfunny, maybe. But Flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meta-mods, please fix this.

  109. Flash Memory by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    While I understand the advantage of non-mechanical parts (having suffered HD failures in both a Neuros and a notebook), I wonder about the flash memory. Isn't there some kind of rewrite limit on this stuff? It makes good sense for some applications (e.g. cameras, music players), but as a general-purpose HD replacement, I'm worried about the huge number of writes that can happen in certain situations or locations.

    Or is flash getting better, so that this isn't the concern that it once was?

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Flash Memory by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Or is flash getting better, so that this isn't the concern that it once was?

      I'm pretty sure flash memory has gotten better. I don't know exact numbers, but it's probably an order of magnitude more writes then was possible a few years ago. Some (all?) of the chips even do automatic wear leveling so that frequent writes by the O/S (such as swap files or updating a directory entry) don't wear out a particular spot in the flash chip.

      And even if you do start to wear out sectors, it will be a gradual process (slowly losing usable space). Which is probably better then a hard drive that catastrophically fails all at once due to mechanical defect.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    2. Re:Flash Memory by vidarh · · Score: 1

      It is an issue, but the file systems used on flash devices are designed to minimise writes to the same region. They tend to do that by remapping blocks so that even if you overwrite the same block in a file the physical write happens somewhere else on the unit. Since the limit is generally the number of erases per erase unit on the device, I don't think it would be much of an issue.

    3. Re:Flash Memory by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The number of write cycles a flash bit can go through have improved, but only slightly. The biggest change improving the longetivity of flash memory is the rotating-block circuitry integrated into flash modules/controllers. Your average SD card (or similar) receives requests to write data to a certain block; it tells the OS it's done so, but writes it to a totally different block, and remembers which virtual blocks map to physical ones. It uses a LRU (least recently used) algorithm to decide where to write a block of data to. This is probably all way more simplified than the way it really works, but the upshot is that most flash manufacturers have gone from rating flash memory storage devices at 10,000 writes to 100,000 writes. I would imagine this only works particularly well when the device has a lot of free space, and you are writing smallish files that don't fill it up.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  110. Final final final by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    Shit it's looking totally different, this is at least the fifth "final design" of this little machine I've seen announced :)

    It looks hot, though, I don't agree I gotta pay triple the price and donate 2, however, they're pushing it.

    The initial plans of selling it for $200 and donating one were more sane.

  111. "invisible children" by kencurry · · Score: 1

    For a school project, my daughter sponsored a showing at our house.

    Needless to say, everyone who say this DVD was greatly affected, we discussed the issues, and donated money.

    Now, think a laptop will make a difference in these kids lives?

    Give out cheap laptops if you want to, but in the end, the true suffering will carry on until people face the difficult problems that don't have easy solutions.

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  112. Speak n Spell by Old+Breadbutt · · Score: 1

    The orange model looks like an old Ti speak and spell. I loved those things.

  113. Re:Cheaper? by layer3switch · · Score: 1

    There are few things you do not understand about CentOS. It's RHEL fork. RHEL is Fedora Core fork. The main difference is whatever works and becomes stable in Fedora Core will be forked into RHEL and CentOS eventually. As far as I am aware of, CentOS doesn't develop or package in parellel with FC or RHEL branch, however CentOS will package after RHEL release their source in dev/test/beta/prod branch. Knowning slow RHEL dev cycle, it's not ideal for workstations and personal computers. The most benifitial platform will be stable and seldomly changing server platform with support of hardware vendors. This is due to maximum customer support and reduce frequent bug patch release.

    This makes Fedora Core more attractive than CentOS or RHEL. You may argue for stability over bleeding edge, but in order to reduce overhead yet increase support from stable and solid community (Red Hat/FC community is one of the oldest while CentOS is recent and uncertain of its future), Fedora Core makes better sense. This is evident if you match software package release within OSS community. You will run into many more Fedora Core packages while you will run into CentOS pacakges which are not part of distro.

    Hope this clears few things up for you.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  114. Real Charity by ACQ · · Score: 1

    What's the incentive? Is it to get a unique machine for yourself and the good feeling of giving to poor 3rd world kids? Screw that. If I paid $300 for three of these, I'd just donate all of them. Whether I can afford to or not is a whole other issue.

    --
    Currently theta testing the prototype "Event Horizon" server-scaled desktop box with a 50 Gigameg of Ram.
    1. Re:Real Charity by TomHandy · · Score: 1

      Umm, presumably, this will help to get some people to help buy some of these OLPC's. Someone paying $300 to get one for themselves, and 2 for children would be someone paying for 2 OLPC's that otherwise weren't paid for. I don't see a reason to say "screw that". I'm sure they will be more than happy if you want to donate $300 to buy 3 OLPC's for children, but I don't see a reason to say "screw that" to something that probably will help drive some donations too.

    2. Re:Real Charity by ACQ · · Score: 1

      My remark is simply my own response to the incentive. It's partly in jest too. I fully understand the intent of the incentive, but personally find it useless. Knowhatimean?

      --
      Currently theta testing the prototype "Event Horizon" server-scaled desktop box with a 50 Gigameg of Ram.
  115. 666 by skubeedooo · · Score: 1

    I'm with BillyG, this is clearly the work of the devil.

  116. WTF? by Gadzinka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only one I am familiar with (Steve), offered free Mac OS X licenses to this group for all the laptops.

    Yeah, helluva donation... OS X is ready, paid for, so giving it away costs him nothing and serves only as a publicity stunt. Or free marketing, whatever you want to call it.

    And huge tax writeoff... Just sit one day and do the math: how much some software company makes "donating" their software to schools, government agencies etc. Because, giving away single license for a program that costs $100 while boxed, on the shelf, is a $100 loss. And the bonus is that those people will be already trained to use their software, while making software purchase decissions later...

    If he wanted to donate some funds for R&D etc, I bet people from OLPC would accept it gladly. But they don't look like morons to me.

    Robert

    --
    Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    1. Re:WTF? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      If Steve was serious he would have open sourced a stripped down version of Aqua to run on Darwin and/or Redhat.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  117. News Corp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What part does News Corp have in this project other than contributing money?

  118. Imagine.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a beowulf cluster of these things.

  119. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol perhaps if you learned to use nested mode at -1 you fucking n00b idiot nigger

  120. End of DRM? by sikandril · · Score: 1

    OK now imagine around 300 million (or more) of these little babies distributed around the globe, all happily playing, and most importantly sharing Mp3 files and movies which can be conveniently stored on any thumbdrive attached to them.

    Where does that leave Vista and OSX initiatives to lock down media with DRM? In shambles.

    Not to mention the fact that if these can create a network between them and the range is long enough, we could each buy one and network 'da hood'...no ISP's, no subpoenas, yep

    1. Re:End of DRM? by TomHandy · · Score: 1

      Vista and OSX won't let you play MP3's, etc. and other non-DRM files? That is news to me. Just because there are efforts to use DRM for protected content, etc. I don't think it means that they are specifically trying to make non-DRM's files unusable. So if you have a bunch of people with OLPC's sharing non-DRM'd files, they would presumably not be any different from all the people with Vista and OSX also using non-DRM'd files.

  121. Abstinence/monogomy is not always 100% effective by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

    Abstinence/monogomy assumes that the person has the ability to change their behavour. In many parts of the world women have no rights. They can not decide to whom they wed nor have the right to abstin from sex from their husbands nor the right to devorice. That is why you often see faithfull women (and their children) with HIV/AIDS who have only slept with their husbands. Adding condems to the mix to dampen the general infection rates help even those who chainge their behavour.

  122. Why not supply these to our school kids?? by Dzimas · · Score: 1

    Why has no one mentioned incorporating these little machines into our own school systems? They're significantly cheaper than Win or Mac notebooks, and have no easily damaged moving parts. Some school districts are already loaning kids notebooks, but why not take it a step further and offer a standardized version of the this machine for everyone? It wouldn't take for MySpace/chat extensions to start springing up all over the place, so that kids could basically behave the same way they already do with their Windows boxes.

    1. Re:Why not supply these to our school kids?? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Why has no one mentioned incorporating these little machines into our own school systems? They're significantly cheaper than Win or Mac notebooks,

      MS & Apple would lobby & sue it out of existence.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:Why not supply these to our school kids?? by iamstan · · Score: 1

      They have. http://www.laptop.org/map.en_US.html Most countries in the world have already expressed interest in this education project.

      About your chat extension. No extensions needed. The planned default is a UI based on chat. http://www.eschoolnews.com/eti/2006/05/001414.php

  123. It looks like... by Net_fiend · · Score: 1

    a speak'n spell. Even at my young age of 23 I remember those things. Its pretty nifty that they have multiple colors, sort of like swatches. Collect'em all! lol.

    Seriously though I have to applaud these guys for creating something that will help out a ton of kids/people around the world. Congrats guys.

    --
    "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty."
  124. Counting on :/'s popularity by crovira · · Score: 1

    but he didn't leave himself enough slack for the /. effect.

    His site's down.

    Hell! I was going to buy one and give away the other two just for the fuck of it.

    But...

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  125. this is all total BS hype by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    Why on earth are these mit wankers getting so much press ? this is a total BS project: you can go down to compusa and buy a laptop for 400 bucks, or even less on sale - a real product, that actually works.
    so, companies in the 3rd world could easily make and sell a 100 dollar laptop today, if they wanted to. That they don't is their problem: if, of all the people in india and china and indonesia and nigeria and brazil, not one person wants to step up and make a 100 dollar laptop - screw em.

  126. Re:China will have the world's biggest economy soo by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    One thing to consider: China may attempt control the internet, but with lots and lots and lots of laptops with wireless connectivity designed for the purpose of creating mesh networks, it'll be a lot harder for them to police it.

    So, giving OLPC laptops to China may be a great way to help undermine the authoritarian system.

    Of course, if the Communist Party realizes this and blocks them, well, then China's next generation may be at a great competitive disadvantage compared to the countries that don't take that step, reducing the ability of the government to meet the material demands of the population while maintaining authoritarian control, and increasing the chance of the regime failing to maintain the support it needs to survive.

    So, as regards China, I see OLPC has having the potential to be Win-Win for the cause of advancing freedom in the long term.

  127. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The crank was inefficient and made it impossible to power and program at the same time. Foot powered is the current paradigm.

  128. Re:Cheaper? by blugu64 · · Score: 1

    Can you please explain exactly *how* CentOS "lets little desktops combine for that kind of power"?

    And none of that "It's an Enterprise OS" tripe! What exactly does CentOS do better for kids in third world countries that Fedora does not? Sorry didn't mean to sounds somewhat harsh, I'm just not understanding your point of view, but would like to.

    --
    "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
  129. Yet another well meaning 1st-world-centric idea by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Having spent a few years in the 3rd world, a few concerns:
    • Biggest problem-- fathers will lose face if they don't have a laptop but their kids do.
    • Is it feasible to have kids using and carrying things equivalent to two months wages? Big incentive to thieves.
    • How to get a network connection in suburban Dar Es Salaam?
    • White plastic around the keyboard? Do you know how that's going to look after one day of not-so-clean hands resting on it?
    1. Re:Yet another well meaning 1st-world-centric idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      White plastic around the keyboard? Do you know how that's going to look after one day of not-so-clean hands resting on it?
      Talk about "1st-world-centric": if someone doesn't care about their hands being clean, do you really think they would care about the appearance of their keyboard? I imagine aesthetics isn't much of an issue for the target audience.
    2. Re:Yet another well meaning 1st-world-centric idea by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Biggest problem-- fathers will lose face if they don't have a laptop but their kids do.


      As I understand the OLPC program, they are looking for governments to buy in bulk and provide them universally to children -- but I don't think they are concerned that they are distributed exclusively to children. So, if a government wants to provide them to everyone, OLPC probably won't object. Plus, since a major concern seems to be getting big enough orders, it would probably be a positive thing.

      Is it feasible to have kids using and carrying things equivalent to two months wages? Big incentive to thieves.


      The more universally distributed they are, the less attractive they'll be to thieves. If virtually everyone has one anyway, there may not be a lot of resale market for black market ones. Well, except to third-world /.ers looking to build beowulf clusters of the cute little beasts.

      How to get a network connection in suburban Dar Es Salaam?


      They are designed to create mesh networks. Now, you make a good point that getting a connection to the broader internet may be a problem, and may require a trek to an access point. Then again, there is a lot of stuff you can do without a persistent, or even more than very-occasional, internet connection that would be useful, though us spoiled first-worlders may have forgotten about it.

      Persistent internet connectivity for the masses is a fairly recent development in the first world. (Heck, internet connectivity for the first-world masses at all is mostly a feature of the last decade and change.)

      With these, with the right software and education, even a remote village without power or phone lines could receive and send e-mail and get some other benefits of the internet, just by having someone bike into town with the village "mail server", make a wireless connection with a system persistently connected, and bike back and mesh with other servers in the village.

      Sure, exploiting the potential will take an educational effort along with the delivery of hardware and software, plus will take people thinking about using the system outside of the context of expectations framed by first-world patterns of development and computer use, but, heck, the thinking outside the box that will require will probably have unexpected benefits even in the developed world.

      White plastic around the keyboard? Do you know how that's going to look after one day of not-so-clean hands resting on it?


      Well, yeah, that's a valid aesthetic issue, though not a major substantive drawback.
    3. Re:Yet another well meaning 1st-world-centric idea by Demerara · · Score: 1

      At the risk of repeating myself, it's better to light a candle than sit and curse the darkness....

      White plastic around the keyboard? Do you know how that's going to look after one day of not-so-clean hands resting on it?

      We wouldn't want our 1st world technology falling into not-so-clean hands now would we?

      --
      Backward%20compatibility%20is%20over-rated
    4. Re:Yet another well meaning 1st-world-centric idea by JoshdanG · · Score: 1

      White plastic around the keyboard? Do you know how that's going to look after one day of not-so-clean hands resting on it?

      Actually that's just the lighting. If you look at the other pictures you can see that it's orange around the keyboard too.

    5. Re:Yet another well meaning 1st-world-centric idea by sperdich · · Score: 1

      I live in a third world country, and I can say that I agree with you. But there's still a problem. Thieves don't understand about things universally popular. I mean. They don't care. Here they just steal whatever they can sell after. It doesn't matter if it belongs to a child or if it is completely popular. http://perdichizzi.com.ar/

  130. To critics by styryx · · Score: 1

    Saying that developing countries need food is actually stupid for two reasons.
    Reason one: Ya think? Reason two: Giving food won't solve the famine, it will only increase the number of people the famine can sustain, hence causing a larger problem. This has been proven and demonstrated time and again.

    Education is the key. These kids need to learn a better way of doing things, they need to learn to think for themselves. They need education so they can learn enough about their problems to be able to solve them. The internet is the best tool for learning since sliced trees. Education teaches them how to be resourceful and build their own farming equipment. Teach them to dig down for water. Teach them to irrigate. Education first, solution will follow, it isn't an immediate fix, but just giving food is no fix at all, it only adds to the problem.

    On a jokey sort of note, I wonder how long before Africa gets targetted by the RIAA...?

  131. New laptops, eh? by insecteye · · Score: 1

    How about the IT industry big players donating all of the refresh program/refurbish PII, PIII and other PCs to the thirdworld, rather than tossing them in the trash, or scrapping them cause they belong to the competition. One good example is that some companies that outsource IS/IT (say HP) first thing they do is ripout all of the Dell, Cisco (as an example) infrasturcture and put their own. What to they do with the Dell/Cisco HW? Who knows. Most likely its trashed since they don't want to to promote the competition. Now you have this project here where we're making new/cheap laptops that we're planning to SELL, vs. take out all of the existing deprecitated PCs, Switches, Hubs, etc, give it to a charity , and let them refurbish these units and re-distribute them ...

  132. I'm sure this will help people in the third world by SpacePunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Family starving? Get a laptop!
    Need a job? Get a laptop!
    No running water? Crapping in a ditch? Get a laptop!

    yeah, this will help those people out.

  133. In other news by AshuBhai · · Score: 1
    1. Re:In other news by AshuBhai · · Score: 1

      TFA

        BANGALORE: India plays a pivotal role in Intel's new "World Ahead" programme, says Paul Otellini on his first visit to this country, as the Chief Executive of the world's number one silicon technology player.

      The $1 billion initiative, will include venture capital activities, education and community outreaches -- and research aimed at creating computing products that will make a difference to the world's `unconnected' millions.

      India has a `double role' in this scenario: A $800 million war chest has already been deployed since December last year, to address educational needs, including a teacher training programme that is Intel's largest such initiative, any where in the world.

      Launching the programme, here on Tuesday, Mr. Otellini said the other India-centric angle, was in the very creation of the products to fuel "World Ahead": Intel's Bangalore-based platform definition centre -- one of only four worldwide -- has designed and developed three different computing platforms: a rugged community shared PC working off a car battery; a low cost-full feature PC with an extremely small form factor that would be available within two months from five different Indian manufacturers at prices at least 20 per cent cheaper than comparable configuration and a students' notebook PC, the "ClassMate", that will be manufactured by partners worldwide next year, under the company's "Eduwise" initiative for schools.

      When it came to the connectivity to reach the 850 million Indian households now untouched by computers and the Internet, Mr. Otellini saw WiMax as the way to go. "This is the best solution for low cost, high bandwidth access to telemedicine and e-learning resources", he said. He added that the company was cooperating with over 14 WiMax trials now being carried out in India by service providers like BSNL, Tata-VSNL, Bharti, Sify and others.

      On Wednesday, Mr. Otellini will lead a large team at the Intel Capital CEO Summit in Mumbai when chief executives of dozens of companies in which Intel has invested worldwide, will meet to discuss opportunities in India.

  134. No, you do not get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will we be able to continue to exploit the third world if they become educated?

  135. MOD PARENT DOWN - RETARDED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why would you replace your iPod with a huge heavy laptop that has LESS storage space?? Even a 512MB shuffle has more space, especially after you drop an operating system into it.

    You could probably get a used notebook (check eBay, seach for sub-$300) that would weight less and have 10x the performance. Or you could just stick with what you've got, and save youself $300, and still have less weight and 10x the performance.

    Shit, you could carry around a SACK of iPods, PDAs, and used notebooks and STILL have less weight and 10x the performance.

    This is not supposed to be a yuppie convenience machine! It's supposed to be a barebones tough-as-nails learning tool for kids who won't have access to anything else! The only reasons I could see any sane person with normal options (ebay) buying this would be:

    • to help develop software for it

    • to support the cause (sending 2 to kids overseas)

    • **MAYBE** because they are going into the deep wilds of (insert undeveloped/anarchic country here) and need a lappy that can be hand cranked, to take notes on. But that's a big maybe.

    • for their own destructive kids, as a learning tool

    • curiousity

    Feel free to rebut any of the above, or just pass me the crack pipe you were smoking when you thought this would be a good replacement for your current items.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - RETARDED by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      This is not supposed to be a yuppie convenience machine! It's supposed to be a barebones tough-as-nails learning tool for kids who won't have access to anything else! The only reasons I could see any sane person with normal options (ebay) buying this would be: ...

      I think you missed the whole point of selling them for $300. They want to raise money - who cares what people are using them for. One of the best things that could happen is that a bunch of people will find uses for them here in industrial countries and effectively supply one for two kids somewhere else.

      Who cares? The more people that have them the better. If we want to give them custom software, we should have the model in hand. Even if it is just users asking for features, that is development.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - RETARDED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you really are a lamer. Appropriate handle, chum. Literacy for the win, by the way.

      Read my post again. In fact, read your except of my post again.

      I said: The only reasons I could see any sane person with normal options (ebay) buying this would be...

      And then I listed the very same reasons that you did. TO RAISE MONEY (I said "to support the cause). TO HAVE A DEVELOPER MODEL (I said to help develop software). And hell, I even covered all those miscellaneous uses with the blanket term "curiousity."

      My point was that NO RATIONAL PERSON would use THIS MACHINE as a replacement for an iPod and a PDA, because it is totally inappropriate. You might as well replace them with a fucking Gameboy. It's a non sequiter, if I can abuse the term.

      Now, do you disagree with me? Do YOU really think you could replace an iPod and PDA with this laptop? Because if you do, I posit that you are a moron, because only a moron would replace a perfectly good iPod--or any mp3 player (weighing only a few ounces, with 14 hrs battery life, and AT LEAST 512 MB storage) with a hugeass laptop with sketchier battery life and even less storage space!

      That's what the grandparent post was suggesting!! One more time: replacing an iPod and PDA that he already owns, with a $100 laptop. Not for charity, not for development, not for any rational reason, but because he thinks it would make a great convergence device.

      That is fucking rediculous!!!

      And you have the gaul to say that *I* missed the point!?! No sir, I don't like it. I don't like it at all.

      Now, if you have anything else to say, just keep it on topic. I am quite aware of my trollish tone and overuse of caps. Rebut the content, kthxbye.

  136. Child porn not a likely problem by crovira · · Score: 1

    the kids will be hunched over their keyboards with something to do instead of being bored and hankering for a few dollars to relieve their boredom.

    Give 'em cheap laptops not expensive AK-47s.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  137. So did Bill... by everphilski · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/$100_laptop#Software

    Bill offered a version of Windows for free for the laptops. Negroponte mocked Bill before Bill mocked him.

  138. Ears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The 'ears' appear to be port covers. They swing out of the way to allow access to ports on the sides of the machines.

    That's what my first glance suggests, at any rate...

  139. Development potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious what will come of this PC from a software development perspective.
    Given how many people whine about how new graphics capabilities have reduced modern games to chrome-festooned crap, I wonder what people will/can do with this limited hardware. Yes, for games, but also for other things. How well can this hardware be hacked to give impressive results?
    And, it seems to me, that this /. audience is a great place to start. What possibilities do you see for this hardware? It can do a lot more than an Atari 2600 or Timex Sinclair. But what exactly are it's limits? Assuming you do not add any memory or drives to it, what could you do using this machine to limit your reliance on hardware and instead rely on l33t hacking skillz?
    Perhaps there needs to be a hacking contest...would /. be up to sponsoring one? Or OSTG? Or any major tech companies?
    There could be many different categories such as best communications hack, best educational hack, best use of hardware (physical hacks), etc, etc. It would be a win-win with hackers getting to hack, and unfortunate children benefiting.

  140. A curicullum is where idea are .. by crovira · · Score: 1

    led to a backroom, tied down and beaten to death.

    The education department creates one that is the 'least challenging' that they think they can get away with.

    The teachers get the curriculum and try to see how little of it they can get away with teaching.

    The students get the teachers 'edict' and try to see how little fo it they can get away with learning.

    I'll take an interested person who learned stuff any day over one who was been taught, then closed his books and his mind.

    You're the sort of academic wanker who made pedagogy a specialized field instead of just noticing how kids learn.

    They LEARN because they DO learn. Children are sponges for facts and knowledge. You never know what they are soaking up. That thirst for knowledge keep them (and me) young too.

    You should know that you can't TEACH anything.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  141. Steve , Bill, eat your hearts out by theolein · · Score: 1

    These latops are cute, extremely so. They will sell like hotcakes even in developed countries, where most people care more about the form than the function. Apple had a big seller with the toilet seat iBook. This will repeat that experience.

    Not only that, but these laptops, if they sell as well as I think they're going to, are going to be the first real danger to Microsoft's worldwide monopoly. Additionally, I now understand why Microsoft was going bonkers critising this thing and why they've recently come out with their braindead rented computer for the poor idea. They are crapping themselves because they know what this can do to their markets.

    1. Re:Steve , Bill, eat your hearts out by east+coast · · Score: 1

      [The 100 dollar laptops] going to be the first real danger to Microsoft's worldwide monopoly

      I've been reading slashdot for a few years now and I hear about a new microsoft killer every couple of days... don't hold your breath on this. MS is going to be generational. By the time Gates retires you might have a MS killer; a new generation of users with real money and corporate pull to get MS kicked to the curb. Until then I don't think we're going to see this mysterious mass-migration every MS bashers seems to be hoping for. Unless the aliens land and give us some great new tech... just make sure you translate their plan for humanity before you get on the space ship.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Steve , Bill, eat your hearts out by fastgood · · Score: 1
      I now understand why Microsoft was going bonkers critising this thing

      WindowsCE/Mobile at version 5 is just barely ready-for-primetime...
      and it's only v5 because Marketing needed something new every year.

      --
      New rule:
      Wait until even number Microsoft
      releases that are divisible by seven

  142. WiFi Ears by batmanuel · · Score: 1

    I like it, but having two small kids I can tell you those ears WILL be broken off within days. They really should talk to Fisher-Price for durable design ideas and not just the color scheme.

  143. Imagine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a beowulf cluster of these!

    You'd have the power of a conventional PC.

  144. Yeah its about teaching to be independent by tizan · · Score: 1

    Show a fisherman how to make fishing line ....he'll not depend on you to get fish thrown at him and his neighbourhood as charity. Allow those that can feed themselves to learn and be aware of modern tools will help to develop the region and hopefully get rid of hunger....

  145. How do you keep them in schools? by lelitsch · · Score: 1

    I am sure MIT can work out the technical issues, but how are they proposing to make sure that the laptops stay in the schools and with the kids?

    While most people in developing countries are scrupulously honest--far more than in developed countries in my experience--, this laptop will be by far the most valuable thing many families, schools, or even villages will own. And it comes in an easily portable package. In many countries, $100 represents the annual income or multiple monthly incomes for families. So there will be a lot of temptation to sell or hawk it in dire circumstances. For example if selling the laptop means getting medicine, or paying for an operation, or paying for food in a drought, what would you do? No mention of WWJD? Let your mom die to be able to hold on to your MIT laptop?

    There might be ways to instill enough community pride for this not to be a problem, but even then, they will still be a huge temptation for the few bad apples. Think some urban hoodlums being able to get out their pickup, drive to a village, break into a school, scoop up $3000 of laptops and selling to someone who either hawks them to more affluent people or puts them on eBay for the tech geeks in the US, Europe or Japan.

    Remember, in a lot of places on the planned distribution list, people dismantle power lines to sell the copper, or burn down a village by drilling into an oil pipeline to tab 5 gallons of gas.

    Cabling them to the desks is not an option if you've even seen what the desks in rural African schools look like, there are no secure rooms, and even if, the locks are more valuable elsewhere. Harsh penalties would be very counterproductive, non-liberal, and would only be enforced very selectively. The only way would be flooding the countries to such a degree that the devices would be essentially worthless. That means: enough for every citizen, plus all the ones someone can sell on eBay.

    I know someone will bring up cell phones, but the big difference is that the phone has little intrinsic value--what's valuable is the contract.

    1. Re:How do you keep them in schools? by rm999 · · Score: 1

      "In many countries, $100 represents the annual income or multiple monthly incomes for families."

      My guess is those countries wouldn't purchase these laptops for children. When I think of these laptops, I think of countries like Brazil or China who are semi-developed but can't afford computers for all their students.

  146. Both are important. by babbling · · Score: 1

    Keeping someone alive but not educating them will only keep them alive as long as you are around, giving them everything they need. Of course people are not going to sit down and use a laptop when they haven't got anything to eat and don't have clean water, but if people don't get educated they will never be able to support themselves.

  147. This is actually a $300 laptop by viking2000 · · Score: 1

    Nice and cute, but is this a $100 laptop?

    I believe manufacturing will cost around $300 laptop.

    The hope is to have it subsidized by donations so they can actually sell it for $100.

    Unless I see a materials list with part cost that show they can manufacture it for $100, I will not believe it.

    Does anyone have a cost breakdown of these models, or this this just hype?

    1. Re:This is actually a $300 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and then this is less than the $350 dell laptop:

      Dell Latitude C600/C610 Pentium III 1GHZ /1000MHz 256MB 20GB HD 14.1Inch XGA CD-ROM 1.44 Floppy 56K Modem 10/100 NIC AC Adapter BatteryWindows 2000 $350

    2. Re:This is actually a $300 laptop by Clod9 · · Score: 1
      Well, their web site tells us that the display would normally cost $150, but they've engineered it down to $35. This is the biggest cost of a laptop if it doesn't have a hard disk.
      Think of the parts inventory: display, case, keyboard, touchpad, RAM, flash RAM, circuit board, CPU, speakers, output jacks, power connections. The display, CPU, and circuit board are the only things likely to cost more than $10 to manufacture.
      Given that the software is free, I can easily believe a $100 manufacturing cost. In fact, provided with only the $35 display and a mainboard, I'll bet a lot of slashdotters could put together a single unit for $200 or so buying the keyboard, RAM, etc. at retail prices. Those two things are where the meat of this project is.

      Another way of thinking about is that a 1GB MP3 player has RAM, flash RAM, CPU, circuit board, and external jacks, and can be had for under $100 retail, with a tidy profit for the manufacturer. Adding a keyboard and a touchpad would be only a few dollars; a wireless chip is a few dollars; add a $35 display and a plastic case and again, you're there under $200, retail. So I think this is believable. I've gone over it a number of times in my head, and I'm convinced the reason we don't all have one is that the manufacturers know the vast majority of current customers spending $1000 on a laptop wouldn't bother if they had one of these. And THAT is the reason, I believe, why Negroponte keeps telling us that we won't be able to buy one. It isn't because it wouldn't be profitable, it isn't because the factory couldn't build out enough capacity (are you kidding?). It's because it would be like GE selling light bulbs that last 100 years, or Gillette selling razors that never get dull.
      "Killing the goose that laid the golden egg", as they say. For this project to succeed, the only real hurdle is convincing the developed world that they have to (or at least should) keep paying high prices for consumer electronics while the developing world gets the same thing for cheap (well, better, really -- who wouldn't want a laptop that doesn't break when you drop it and doesn't run out of power on the plane?)

    3. Re:This is actually a $300 laptop by Clod9 · · Score: 1

      Yet another data point is that Fry's will sell you a whole desktop computer with hard drive, CD drive, keyboard/mouse, all the standard stuff for $149 retail. The parts cost has got to be less than $100.
      The OLPC trades out the hard drive, CD drive, modem, 10/100 ethernet, 250W power supply, and adds in a display, wireless hardware, and AC adapter. Again, if the display really is $35, the stated cost is easy to believe.

    4. Re:This is actually a $300 laptop by viking2000 · · Score: 1

      the $149 pc at fry's is a loss leader. I would gess that cost is around $180. And BTW, this is without a LCD display. It is however about the same as the $100(?) laptop:

      motherboard+CPU $70
      case+opower $20
      kbd+mouse $10
      FDD: $10
      HDD: $25
      memory: $12
      LCD screen: $125

      Assembly cost: $10
      Shipping:$10
      Other costs (Warranty etc) :$6

      Fry's cheap PC(exclude LCD): $183
      Laptop:(Exclude HDD,FDD): $263

  148. What a prick ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I've never seen anyone more clueless than you. I only said I wanted to see what the resolution looked like ... like an upclose shot of a text editor or e-mail. I never said it was bad, I only said it was a potential problem. These displays were rumored to cost under $20 to meet the $100 limit and I'm very curious to see what kind of resolution they actually are capable of.

    1. Re:What a prick ... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Well for being the clueless one here, I know the resolution and the full specs and information of the units. IT'S ON THEIR PAGE. All of the information has been available for some time about these laptops. Teh intarweb is amazin'

      Peace out, and word to your mother.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  149. Microsoft would never allow it. by babbling · · Score: 1

    One way or another, Microsoft would not allow kids to start growing up using Free Software. They would sooner pay kids to use Windows than let them grow up using some Linux-based OS.

    Allowing that to happen would be disastrous for their future sales. People use what they are used to. It might be a good idea to try providing this laptop in US schools, but only as an attempt to get Microsoft to offer a better deal than they currently are. It could have an unwanted side-effect, though. Proprietary software companies could gang up on all of the people who produce Free Software, suing them for software patent infringement.

  150. Try 16MB or 32MB. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Try 16 or 32. I used to run Win95 on a Pentium/133 with 16MB of RAM and it worked fine. With 98Lite, 98 is essentially 95 with bugfixes.

    --

    +++ATH0
  151. OSX by zogger · · Score: 1

    That's because from the outset they insisted on totally free and open source code *only*. These are going primarily to developing nations and they wanted an absolute guarantee that the code would be available in it's entirety for the budding devs there to tweak on. OSX, even if given away "free" as in beer right now would still have no such guarantee or access to all the code forever, unless apple wants a change of heart and GPLs(or very very close) all their code, which I doubt was part of their offering to the project when they said "free"..

    1. Re:OSX by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Don't be ridiculous. Open source software doesn't provide any more longevity than OS X would. Once it's installed, it's good to go...budding developers are not the main target of these computers, as has been suggested elsewhere. Nobody expects these people to start working on the low level components on these computers--they have to learn programming first, and you don't start with OS design. The closed parts of OS X don't inhibit tinkering.

      The decision not to go with OS X is purely ideological, because parts are closed. No part of the decision is expressly functional. There's nothing wrong with that, but don't try to cover it up.

  152. Did they modify the design ? by PGC · · Score: 1

    Did they modify the design of the green model ?? They design at the homepage of olpc shows the screen standing on a standard that can fold nicely into the back, thus enabling it for e-book use. A video showed the laptop to be detached from the screen (usb I guess) .... I serliously wand that model (INCLUDING sling windup option !) However, seeing the pics at the link from slashdot it seems to be very different.

    --
    The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
  153. Re:Abstinence/monogomy is not always 100% effectiv by honkycat · · Score: 1

    That's true -- and perhaps education will help curb their risky behavior as well. If a husband infects his faithful wife with AIDS, he got it first. It's in HIS interest not to engage in that behavior just as much as it's in hers.

  154. It's about time by magicjava · · Score: 1

    It's about time someone got the starving and AIDS infected children of Africa laptops with Open Source Software preinstalled.

    http://www.redcross.org/

  155. why 3? by zogger · · Score: 1

    Why not just 2 for a pledge to get one, or even just sell them outright at 150$ (if they can actually be made and shipped for $100), with the recipient getting one laptop and 50 bucks donation towards the project? I am not so sure they will get 100,000 pledges, but perhaps. If they only get 99,000 pledges does that mean the whole deal is off, or what? Even the official project is not committed to this effort yet from reading the commentary there. The "first world" is awash in charities that all want our "spare" money,so I think they should be more realistic on this.

  156. Foolish thinking by alandd · · Score: 1

    Instead of laptops, what if this was the "Teach the World to Read" campaign. Does this sound acceptable?

    "Family starving? Learn to read!"
    "Need a job? Learn to read!"
    "No running water? Crapping in a ditch? Learn to read!"

    If so, why? Don't the same reasons for teaching people to read apply to teaching people to use a computer? If not, why not?

    It is foolish thinking to believe...
    1. ...everyone in the third world is starving. Most are not, just not eating well.
    2. ...everyone in the third world doesn't have a job. Most do, just not good ones.
    3. ...everyone in the third world doesn't have access to clean water and sanitary conditions. Most do, just not plumbing.

    What a computer in their hands does is open up a whole world of possible advancement and improvements to all of the above. It helps their economy, micro and macro, to rise to improved nutrition, better jobs and better infrastructure. It adds to their own self-sufficientcy and capabilities.

    I have been to a few poor parts of the world. In one example, I have seen a water/irrigation project that a generous group from the US installed some years prior. It was in complete disuse and decay because the locals did not know how or have the resources to maintain it.

    In the long run education and local knowledge are more important than support programs and one-time gifts. These computers are intented to help create the long term and local solutions to these issues.

    1. Re:Foolish thinking by SpacePunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I know that points 1 to 3 above aren't correct, but that's just the impression that is given out.

      You can't do anything to improve conditions untill the governments, and whatever priesthood (generic term), that is in power wants those better changes. It's corruption that keeps the citizens in poor conditions, not the lack of available laptops. So now they will still have poor conditions, but now they'll have a laptop to play with... perhaps even to sell in order to afford food or rent for that month. Having a few cheap laptops around isn't going to fix the irrigation system you mention. That problem came about mainly because the people that set it up didn't leave documents or instructions on how it operates. Someone shows up, installs something beneficial, then leaves without proper instruction. Laptops will show up, nobody will have proper instruction, and in a few weeks it's being used as a doorstop or something to set a hot kettle on.

      Cheap laptops don't address the issue that there are a great number of countries in Africa, for instance, where superstion runs rampant. The connection there is that superstition is a sign of blatant ignorance, and there's no way to fix ignorance (you can't really fix stupidity either). The laptops will just be turned into plastic bricks.

    2. Re:Foolish thinking by jamboarder · · Score: 1

      Superstition and blatant ignorance seems rather more your afflication than the so-called 3rd world of which I and many others are a part. Ooh, ooh, I bet this message posting came about because a sufficiently large number of people like me were locked in a room with kompootrr for a sufficiently long time. Ignorance indeed...

    3. Re:Foolish thinking by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Proof that if enough monkeys type on enough keyboards... nevermind... they still have work to do.

    4. Re:Foolish thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The laptops will just be turned into plastic bricks.

      Rise up, Third World. Beat your plowshares into swords! Turn your laptops into bricks!!

  157. "Realism" would require a little more research. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm a realist
    That's a strange thing to post, considering you everything you've said on the subject seems to be based on your fantasies of what the project can actually accomplish. I recommend you either seek out some real knowledge of the project (your posts indicate you have absolutely no understanding of what the project is trying to accomplish, so you are supplying your own fantasy motivations) or stop wasting your time posting uninformed negativism and use your energies positively elsewhere.

    If you don't want to be part of OLPC, fine, consider going down to your local adoption center and finding a child you can personally raise - that's what I'm doing. Or visit your local elementary school and find out how their mentoring program works. Or join Big Brothers if that's available where you are.

    Or, more simply: stop bein' such a downer, man. Be a POSITIVE force!
  158. SnS by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    To me, it looks like some kind of possessed version of my old Speak-N-Spell.

    --
    Karma: NaN
  159. AMD 400Mhz slower than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a A64 running at 400Mhz. Hell it's not even a Athlon XP or Athlon. It's a Geode -- a x86 lower powered chip designed for embedded apps. Basically at 400mhz, it's probably the equivalent of a Pentium 175Mhz. While OSX or Windows could "run", they would both be so slow it's unusable.

    1. Re:AMD 400Mhz slower than you think by trashbat · · Score: 1
      While OSX or Windows could "run", they would both be so slow it's unusable.
      Not for the Germans!
    2. Re:AMD 400Mhz slower than you think by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      Windows 98 on a 433MHz Celeron is what I used up until 2002. It would still be able to do everything I do today except for running Firefox as quickly, and using MSN voice chats.

  160. 1st-world-centrism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does that even mean? That because we have computers, those dirty primitive third worlders couldn't possibly want or need them too? Seems to me that the people who endlessly criticize the idea of making technology accessible to the worlds poor are the ones who are "first world centric".

  161. OT food stamps by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Most places now use credit-card like account-debit systems, rather than bearer stamps, for their "food stamp" programs, making this much more difficult to do.

    You could I suppose borrow someone's foodstamp card, buy stuff with it, and then give it back, but you can't just buy x stamps and walk away with them. Not that there aren't junkies probably willing to trade the whole card for enough cash, but it doesn't allow for the sort of black-market arbitrage that used to exist with the real stamps.

    YMMV, of course -- but it's been a long time since I've seen actual stamps in use, though. (This is in New England.)

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  162. re: outsourced production by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Yep... ironic, yet reality - is it not? I once looked into getting some injection molding done for a plastic case, and discovered that although many engineering firms in the U.S. are happy to help with the initial design, they practically all recommend you have your "thousands of units" pressed over in China where the labor is much cheaper.

    Most of those laptop parts are being assembled in the 3rd. world too, like the LCD screens and components that go on the circuit boards.

    At least they'll be building devices they can actually benefit from afterwards, instead of only working for someone else's benefit.

  163. Why Three? by crhylove · · Score: 2

    I'd happily donate one by paying double, that should be enough. Charging triple seems like gauging, especially when there are plenty of impoverished kids IN THIS COUNTRY who could use a kick-ass $200 laptop. I'm one of them.

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:Why Three? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I'd happily donate one by paying double, that should be enough. Charging triple seems like gauging, especially when there are plenty of impoverished kids IN THIS COUNTRY who could use a kick-ass $200 laptop. I'm one of them.
      You have acess to a computer. You have your own freakin' domain. You aren't impoverished, or in need of 'kick-ass' laptop.

      What you need is a kick in the ass for being so arrogant as to think yourself in any way as needy as the kids these laptops are destined for.

    2. Re:Why Three? by crhylove · · Score: 1

      I think it's fairly unfair to assume anything about my financial standing relating from something as simple as an email address. The point was that donations should be cumpalsary, and if not, then at least within reason. $200 seems like plenty to pay for a $100 product. The fact that somebody isn't already making and selling these with Ubuntu installed shows that there is no more free market in this country, and I think that's sad. Though a completely different problem with different solutions than the one stated to be solved by the OLPC program.

      I think the whole program is a worthwhile endeavor, and I'd like to see it succeed. I think that even with it's good intentions and aims following the fast nickels rule of business is a good idea. If they can sell 100 million at $200 and only $20 million at $300.... Why the hell NOT sell them cheaper, make more money and donate EVEN MORE LAPTOPS to the 3rd world?

      Seems like econ 101 to me.

      rhY

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  164. I'm in, too... by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    >I'll pay for three and donate two any day of the week.

    I appreciate you doing that. 'Cause I'm gonna buy one of your two donated ones for $50 on eBay.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  165. Buy one at 300 to put myself out of work? by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

    Ok, so someone has to have mentioned it is insane to purchase one for 300 just to have it, giving 200 to the cause to have 2 for some other saps less fortunate (I'm out of work too), and then eventually compete for the same job I want. I think I'll pass on this offering. Last time I checked Walmart was offering higher quality systems for 387 USD prior to Xmas last year, I'll wait until xmas this year to wait in line for such an offering. I do have to say, the colors and flippy up ears on the machine are attractive to rab(bi)d(t) programmers like me :)

  166. Speak and Spell is Back! by nycroft · · Score: 1

    Wow, Fisher Price has to be pissed about this one. I'm still gonna buy it though.

    --
    Mr. Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time is enemy action.
  167. QWERTY? by lupa1420 · · Score: 1

    Does the use of the QWERTY keyboard layout mean that another million plus children get to ride a cheaper track toward carpel tunnel syndrome and early-onset repetitve strain injury because of an oversight in the midst of the visionary whirlwind that neglected to notice the inherent benefits of the much more reasonable DVORAK layout?

  168. "health is the cornerstone" by cwgmpls · · Score: 1
    We believe health is the cornerstone of human development.

    Funny how, when there is a healthcare crisis in other countries, the U.S. solution is to pour billions of dollars into direct healthcare services for those countries. But when there is a healthcare crisis in the U.S. ( U.S. has second worst newborn death rate in modern world), the U.S. solution is to privatize healthcare, maximize profits for the healthcare industry, and essentially tell its people to "go get an education and a job".

    If education and employment is the solution for the healthcare crisis in the U.S., why is not not a plausible solution for other countries as well?

  169. If it hasn't been said already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it hasn't been said already it needs to be.

    The places in the third world these laptops are destined for have far greater problems than access to computers, cheap or otherwise. Clean water, ample food, adequate shelter, basic medicines and rudimentary health care, physical security and relief from sometimes severe forms of oppression and exploitation are all greater needs by orders of magitude IF outside influence and interference can ever be justified, warranted or desired.

    At times we look at the third world or even the second and ponder the pleasantness of a simpler lifestyle. By the same token we look at the mega living complexes build in the far east for example, those skyscrapers in their multitudes souring hundreds of floors, each one a self contained city where people can live within it and never need leave in their lifetime. Manufactured human habitat of concrete and steel, completely designed and managed for the maximum efficiency and productivity of human labor.

    Merely the latest fashion in high technology oppression and exploitation? Perhaps the only natural grass a child born in that environment may ever see is on display in the lobby and viewable for three tokens? Never to climb a tree or jump in a puddle? That the "natural" environment becomes a well supervised McDonalds plasic playland found disbursed on every third floor? Where the old and the sick are elevatored to the basement incinerator for mechanized disposal at the actuarial end of their lives? Better?

    I understand this is the opposite extreme, perhaps slightly imbellished for effect but therein lays the underlying question. What is best for an indigneous people and who are we to decide? Is wrenching these people into the modern world doing them any favors? And if not, who is the beneficiary? Global Corporations? Does an Email account and an Ipod make peoples lives all that much improved or does it simply serve to placate a penetentary existance in a concrete jungle? So an African tribesman risks being gored by a Credit Card company instead of a Wildebeest? Which risk is greater? He knows the Wildebeest.

    For however hardscrabble life can be found in many places you don't find the kind of depression and dispair that permeates our more modern, technologically advanced society where the value of human life has been reduced to a number on a paystub or ones asperations held within annual reviews perpetually on file and indexed. It would be hard to argue that the complexities of modern life is not in itself debilitating and it is likewise difficult to weigh the benefits of first world imposition.

    The 'Hundred Dollar Laptop' is a design and manufacturing challenge that many have been caught up in. I myself find it an interesting subject even though I have serious doubts whether such a device should be implemented as envisioned. I think the vision is flawed and the motivation suspect. Just because we can do something does not necessarily mean we should and that it may be better to leave the indigneous people of the world well enough alone in their natural environs. They may be the only survivors of a species hell bent on self destruction.

    In a way this is the Kwanzaa effect where Evangelical Christians found it abhorrent that godless savages where being left out of the joys of Christmas and so set about rectification with self righteous reverence in pious imposition. In result Evangelical Christians feel much better about themselves and the displaced reinactors of African culture twenty generations removed have another drum to beat. I doubt the indigneous savages much care.

  170. this 100 dollar laptop. by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

    is the poster child of the rift between first and third world.
    no third world family is going to spend the equivalent of $100 of their local money(despite the fact that it would most likely be at or over a years worth of income for them) on this. they would rather spend it on essentials such as food and water. even if it was given to them they still would not find too much use for it.
    the money spent to make this would of been better used in helping the poor in the third world get better access to water and fight the world bank in it's pursuit of making water a commodity and not what it really is, a necessity needed for life.
    i know i will be modded down and shouted at by libertarians because i soiled their 'all mighty free market god'. that doesn't hide the fact that i am speaking the truth here.

  171. Re:25 Anniversary Mac? by MoriaOrc · · Score: 1

    I think you mean the 20th Anniversary Mac, and Lain was first aired a year after the 20th Anniv. Mac came out, so the Navi might have been inspired by it.

  172. argue with negroponte by zogger · · Score: 1

    Who is covering up anything??? From day one, the project originator Negroponte has said that this device would be designed to run on purely open source software. Read those words again until you understand that part. If me saying that out loud is a "coverup", that is a rather strange view. OSX is not pure open source software. The software they will be receiving is. It's open now and always will be. OSX is not, even if steve jobs offers the first install free as in beer. That is raw verifiable data. The MIT project wants pure open source so that developing nations can move freely into the computing age,this is the long view they have, from a cost, customization and useability factor, to not face the prospect of having to compromise or jump through hoops some time in the future-which could happen with closed source propietary stuff, that they will have access to all, not part, ALL, the souce code they need without licensing worries forever, at least the chance at it, and he doesn't want the kids fooling around with closed source when free and open will allow them a lot more freedom and flexibility and save them-their nations on down the road,a lot of money in the long run. these kids who are going to be getting these laptops ARE going to be these various nations devs later on, not all of them, but a lot of them, a lot of them WILL BE coding their first on these machines, that's part of the deal,and that's how this stuff works, kids grow up, learn on the way, get jobs, become productive members of their nations societies. With total open source it makes it a lot easier for them to pull this off.

      This is just *data*, it is not debateable opinion, you can go google around yourself for what he has said about open source versus the alternatives, I just checked, a lot of references. That's partially what the project is about, exposing them to both the hardware and the software, the hardware gets subsidised and provided as inexpensively as possible, and the software gets donated free and it is also FREE. That's it, that's the project. And OSX or Windows just don't fit that capital "F" free deal there, even if they offered an intro small letter "f" free version.

    Like I said, negroponte isn't hiding, go argue with him over it, call him up, send an email, whatever, I was just reporting what I have read of what he has said on the subject of open source,numerous times, paraphrased. He's not even close to being hard to understand on this point.

  173. not making them until they collect a billion $ ! by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1
    This surprised me:
    Manufacturing will begin when 5 to 10 million machines have been ordered and paid for in advance.
    http://www.laptop.org/faq.en_US.html

    Looks like a lot of room for corruption to creep into the system. They also said their primary target for customers are governments; when have governments ever paid in advance? :)

  174. How about clean drinking water? by irishkev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How much better off would children be, in general, if the resources that went into making these cheap laptops were instead used to design and build inexpensive, village sized solar water distillation units?

    After all, what's the leading cause of death in the world?

    It's not a cheap laptop deficiency:

    http://http//www.voanews.com/english/archive/2005- 03/2005-03-17-voa34.cfm

    The World Health Organization says that every year more than 3.4 million people die as a result of water related diseases, making it the leading cause of disease and death around the world. Most of the victims are young children, the vast majority of whom die of illnesses caused by organisms that thrive in water sources contaminated by raw sewage. VOA's Jessica Berman has more on the story. A report published recently in the medical journal The Lancet concluded that poor water sanitation and a lack of safe drinking water take a greater human toll than war, terrorism and weapons of mass destruction combined. According to an assessment commissioned by the United Nations, 4,000 children die each day as a result of diseases caused by ingestion of filthy water. The report says four out of every 10 people in the world, particularly those in Africa and Asia, do not have clean water to drink.

    1. Re:How about clean drinking water? by GoulDuck · · Score: 1
      How much better off would children be, in general, if the resources that went into making these cheap laptops were instead used to design and build inexpensive, village sized solar water distillation units?
      You can help the poor people in two ways:
      - Give the what they need
      - Educate them, so they learn how to get what they need

      It's not all the one or the other. Computers can be used to education.
  175. (Nicholas|John) Negroponte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but who cares about Gates and Jobs... Nicholas Negroponte (head of MIT's Media Lab, the guy behind this) is the brother of John Negroponte (United States Director of National Intelligence). Think John asked Nick to put some sort of back door into these, spread 'em around the Third World and give the Evil Empire (U.S.of A.) access to everything that's done on'em? Michael Hayden are you listening to me? Lenovo, what a buntch of pikers!

    I going back to Stop'n'Shop for another roll of tin-foil, thank yew.

  176. Is it just me... by paulmer2003 · · Score: 1

    Or does this thing look like a childish toy?

  177. Changing Distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love the idea of this project, and I intend on suporting it for Orphanage outreach, as it is one of the many things they could use...

    But with the single computer they have, all they know is Win 98 and Ubuntu. Would it be possible to manually change the O.S?

  178. Shall we play a game? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    No wonder it's only $100.. it's a Speak & Spell with a flip up screen.

    "Now shpell: Gerahh"

    "X - X - X - X - X - X - X..."

    Heh heh.. those were the days.

  179. Re:I'm sure this will help people in the third wor by Monkier · · Score: 1

    these arguments always come up whenever the OLPC is ever mentioned.. some of my thoughts: * i don't think this laptop is intended for the poorest people in the world - yet there would be benefits for everyone whenever the middle class in these countries grow and become more influential.. * would people use the same arguments if MIT was aiming to provide textbooks to every child? a $100 laptop would actually be CHEAPER than the production/transportation costs of some textbooks. there's a great deal of children in the world who assemble for schooling 5 days a week - in a school with a MAJOR shortage of teaching materials and staff. there may even be a 'subversive' effect when children/families suddenly have wikipedia at their fingertip - development of critical thinking. its a well intended gift from the developing world - and nothing is going to change overnight - but that no reason not to try. my prediction for the near future: we'll be seeing news reports of government troops smashing down doors taking about laptops that've been used for {$imaginary_anti_social_reason}. that'll be when we know tyrannical governments are getting worried about the effects of knowledge and critical thinking..

  180. because of course by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    Mr. Gates is a complete stranger to philanthropy.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  181. Re:I'm sure this will help people in the third wor by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    Hey, laptops in schools hasn't helped here in the U.S. The school systems are still cranking out major league dumbasses. It's the 'want' to learn, not the tool used. You can give the average Joe the finest brush in the world, but don't expect him to create even a mediocre painting with it.

  182. The horns are not wireless antennas... by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    ...they ease the installation of BSD-based operating systems! ;-)

  183. An Apple eMate? by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    Those laptops remind me of the Apple's eMate, but with a better choice of colors.

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  184. Yes you could! But Newton OS fits better by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    A friend is running OS X 10.3 in a iMac G3 333 Mhz, 128 Mb RAM just fine. A stripped down version of OS X could run fine on the $100 laptop hardware.

            Now, on your 2nd point, from Apple's perspective, they will not lose anything, since the $100 laptops doesn't overlay with any of Apple's offers/market. The key point is that OS X is not Open Source, just the kernel, but, if Apple released Newton OS under an open source license, this would be the perfect match for the $100 laptop proyect.

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  185. They all look like 3D/photoshop fakes by DVant · · Score: 1

    They all look a tad wierd if you ask me. The images on the screens are badly composited and the lighting is all wrong. Am awaiting the day they actually show a real one.

  186. Re:20 Anniversary Mac? by captjc · · Score: 1

    sorry, my bad

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  187. Re:20 Anniversary Mac? by MoriaOrc · · Score: 1

    No worries, I only found out that info because I wanted to see a picture of one.