I have quite a bit of experience with Sarbanes-Oxley and UNIX compliance. One weak area is auditing root and shared account access. Generally the developers know the application account's password (like oracle or db2) and it's really hard to audit who did what.
I created the tool Enterprise Audit Shell (EAS) which centrally logs shell access and sessions in an enterprise environment. Sessions can be snooped in real-time or played back at a later time. Each session is digitally signed and transmitted via OpenSSL.
Project Site
http://sourceforge.net/projects/eash
Support Forum
http://eas.strchr.net/
Hey calm down there, buddy!
I'm pretty happy that I receive my mail.
I have never received one false positive with GMail. Using other services and spam filtering I would always have to dig through my "spam" folder looking for a missed message.
Hope that clears things up.
* A nice user interface that is very responsive. * Web-based. * Auto-complete/tab-completion of email addresses. * Ability to search my email. * Advanced sorting and rules. I can place my mail subscriptions into different labels and archive them for later. * Reliability. Gmail is much more reliable than previous hosts. My mail is delivered and I receive my mail. * Group email threads together. * Mail filters. * vi-like keyboard shortcuts.
$ echo "I'm talking about the cartoon with Fred and Wilma!" | perl -pe 's#(.*)#$1#g;' I'm talking about the cartoon with Fred and Wilma! $ echo "I thought you said Fred and Velma, not Wilma" | perl -pe 's#(.*?)#$1#g;'; I thought you said Fred and Velma, not Wilma
Microsoft is using an open and robust format (XML) for their office documents - what's wrong with that? Now projects like OpenOffice have an easier time importing and exporting documents. The entire key is portability.
(text also compresses better than.doc files)
Who actually listens to music on their cellphone anyway?
When's the last time a company built a cellphone just for the purpose of making and receiving calls?
I wouldn't want my name, address and other "public" information broadcasted and readily available to people I do not know or trust.
If it's public information, that's fine - there should fee when someone wants to access it. That way there is a paper trail that links who looked at what.
It's much easier to sign a wavier stating "I understand there is bad stuff on the Internet" rather than trying to filter content. This can also be applied to companies that filter content as well. Otherwise it's too easy to be setup for a law suit when someone finds something on the Internet that offends them. Afterall the content is supposed to be filtered and someone has to be at fault.
Isn't there a law stating if the person cannot afford the fine, the fine has to be lowered or dropped? For instance how could you fine a homeless person $100 for trespassing?
I've been using this service for about 2 years. I call Thailand every night for about 4.8 cents a minute. All of the other providers are about 17 to 20 cents a minute -- complete rip off.
Oh yeah if you sign-up - refer me because I sure could use the extra phonecard. I spent $3000 last year.
Slashdot Mirror
I have quite a bit of experience with Sarbanes-Oxley and UNIX compliance. One weak area is auditing root and shared account access. Generally the developers know the application account's password (like oracle or db2) and it's really hard to audit who did what. I created the tool Enterprise Audit Shell (EAS) which centrally logs shell access and sessions in an enterprise environment. Sessions can be snooped in real-time or played back at a later time. Each session is digitally signed and transmitted via OpenSSL. Project Site http://sourceforge.net/projects/eash Support Forum http://eas.strchr.net/
Just imagine if you didn't buy any Xbox360s, that would be a 100% loss for microsoft. You're just helping them recuperate their losses.
Hey calm down there, buddy! I'm pretty happy that I receive my mail. I have never received one false positive with GMail. Using other services and spam filtering I would always have to dig through my "spam" folder looking for a missed message. Hope that clears things up.
If you have a cellphone in the U.S.A. you can submit your cellphone number and GMail will send you an invitation.
but no one else delivered.
* A nice user interface that is very responsive.
* Web-based.
* Auto-complete/tab-completion of email addresses.
* Ability to search my email.
* Advanced sorting and rules. I can place my mail subscriptions into different labels and archive them for later.
* Reliability. Gmail is much more reliable than previous hosts. My mail is delivered and I receive my mail.
* Group email threads together.
* Mail filters.
* vi-like keyboard shortcuts.
Kill all of your processes.
/etc/passwd|cut -d: -f1,3
:a -e 's/\(.*[0-9]\)\([0-9]\{3\}\)/\1,\2/;ta'
$ ps -ef|awk '{print $2}'|xargs kill
Edit a file and delete the first and last line.
$ vi
1GddGdd:wq!
Find out what's filling up your home directory.
$ du -k|sort -rn|head
Who has access to the computer?
# cat
Add commas to numerical strings
sed -e
Example makes no sense.
$ echo "I'm talking about the cartoon with Fred and Wilma!" | perl -pe 's#(.*)#$1#g;'
I'm talking about the cartoon with Fred and Wilma!
$ echo "I thought you said Fred and Velma, not Wilma" | perl -pe 's#(.*?)#$1#g;';
I thought you said Fred and Velma, not Wilma
Microsoft is using an open and robust format (XML) for their office documents - what's wrong with that? Now projects like OpenOffice have an easier time importing and exporting documents. The entire key is portability. (text also compresses better than .doc files)
Who actually listens to music on their cellphone anyway? When's the last time a company built a cellphone just for the purpose of making and receiving calls?
I wouldn't want my name, address and other "public" information broadcasted and readily available to people I do not know or trust. If it's public information, that's fine - there should fee when someone wants to access it. That way there is a paper trail that links who looked at what.
I wear a size XXXXL you insensitive clod!
one bad apple spoils the bunch.
It's much easier to sign a wavier stating "I understand there is bad stuff on the Internet" rather than trying to filter content. This can also be applied to companies that filter content as well. Otherwise it's too easy to be setup for a law suit when someone finds something on the Internet that offends them. Afterall the content is supposed to be filtered and someone has to be at fault.
Isn't there a law stating if the person cannot afford the fine, the fine has to be lowered or dropped? For instance how could you fine a homeless person $100 for trespassing?
Yeah. Probably on a CD in his briefcase. I doubt he emailed the screennames and the casino operator payed him via PayPal.
Do the crime, pay the time.
I'm not sure how he's going to pay $200k+ though.
http://www.pinzoo.com/
I've been using this service for about 2 years. I call Thailand every night for about 4.8 cents a minute. All of the other providers are about 17 to 20 cents a minute -- complete rip off.
Oh yeah if you sign-up - refer me because I sure could use the extra phonecard. I spent $3000 last year.
Judging from past experiences, does Lucas know the difference?