The American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) is a non-profit worldwide scientific and educational organization of amateur and professional astronomers who are interested in stars that change in brightness—variable stars. See http://www.aavso.org/visionmis.... It is not true that today only pro are doing useful work in astronomy. Variable stars are multiple and need long observations: I know people doing as a nice hobby and... publishing: see http://www.dppobservatory.net/
Many people in industry are thinking that we need to be very careful in the near-future when using public-key cryptography. A catastrophic event is a possibility.
See the next month workshop about catastrophic events related to cryptography and their possible solutions: CATACRYPT
( http://catacrypt.org/ ) near London. You're welcome to participate. With a committee where a lot of very important contributors.
This talk at Black Hat this summer is thus very interesting. It was anticipated by a talk at CCC in Berlin in December 2011, see
28th Chaos Communication Congress (28C3), Berlin, 29 December 2011: talk by Renaud Devalière and Jean-Jacques Quisquater, in cooperation with David Samyde, The future of cryptology: which 3 letters algorithm(s) could be our Titanic? RMS Olympic, RMS Titanic, HMHS Britannic vs Discrete Logarithm, Integer factorization, Conjectured hard problems: talk is at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4n7yUBtTt0
There was also a high-level workshop this year in January in Menlo Park about the end of RSA.
The slides are here: http://catacrypt.org/rsa-isat-brief%20-%20Public.pdf with permission.
Be careful about the preferences.
About my name (Quisquater):
- Putting safe search ON gives 0 result...
- Putting safe search OFF gives 36394 results.
CUIL is not ready to be subtle.
For Google:
63100 results.. for the 3 levels of safe search.
Hum!
Louis Monier (do you have his current email?) don't like my results because I'm working about attacks?
I've a question: it seems that nanowire and nanotube are the same objects.
In that case, nothing so new. See http://www.geobacter.org/
and a paper in the June 23, 2005 issue of Nature about the geobacter
bacteria.
I did a funny use of it during the rump session of
CRYPTO 2005 at UCSB, see
http://www.iacr.org/conferences/crypto2005/rumpSchedule.html
"The geobacter attack: when nanotechnology meets chips"
with the slides and the video.
Slashdot Mirror
The American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) is a non-profit worldwide scientific and educational organization of amateur and professional astronomers who are interested in stars that change in brightness—variable stars. See http://www.aavso.org/visionmis.... It is not true that today only pro are doing useful work in astronomy. Variable stars are multiple and need long observations: I know people doing as a nice hobby and ... publishing: see http://www.dppobservatory.net/
Many people in industry are thinking that we need to be very careful in the near-future when using public-key cryptography. A catastrophic event is a possibility. See the next month workshop about catastrophic events related to cryptography and their possible solutions: CATACRYPT ( http://catacrypt.org/ ) near London. You're welcome to participate. With a committee where a lot of very important contributors. This talk at Black Hat this summer is thus very interesting. It was anticipated by a talk at CCC in Berlin in December 2011, see 28th Chaos Communication Congress (28C3), Berlin, 29 December 2011: talk by Renaud Devalière and Jean-Jacques Quisquater, in cooperation with David Samyde, The future of cryptology: which 3 letters algorithm(s) could be our Titanic? RMS Olympic, RMS Titanic, HMHS Britannic vs Discrete Logarithm, Integer factorization, Conjectured hard problems: talk is at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4n7yUBtTt0 There was also a high-level workshop this year in January in Menlo Park about the end of RSA. The slides are here: http://catacrypt.org/rsa-isat-brief%20-%20Public.pdf with permission.
Be careful about the preferences. About my name (Quisquater): - Putting safe search ON gives 0 result ...
- Putting safe search OFF gives 36394 results.
CUIL is not ready to be subtle.
For Google:
63100 results .. for the 3 levels of safe search.
Hum!
Louis Monier (do you have his current email?) don't like my results because I'm working about attacks?
I've a question: it seems that nanowire and nanotube are the same objects. In that case, nothing so new. See http://www.geobacter.org/ and a paper in the June 23, 2005 issue of Nature about the geobacter bacteria. I did a funny use of it during the rump session of CRYPTO 2005 at UCSB, see http://www.iacr.org/conferences/crypto2005/rumpSchedule.html "The geobacter attack: when nanotechnology meets chips" with the slides and the video.
See, for instance, http://jp.physoc.org/cgi/content/full/517/3/631 a paper from 1999 with the title "Galvanic vestibular stimulation: new uses for an old tool" Best,
I really prefer this one: http://www.orientalglamour.com/chinese%20products% 20wholesale/bamboodecoration9.jpg
More bamboo!
To be able to trace pirated copies of silence we need a research project for watermarking the silence ...