Slashdot Mirror


Bamboo Bike A Reality

markjugg writes "The American Bamboo Society has a page describing a working bamboo bike. This is a strong step towards making bicycling more sustainable, expecially in contrast to aluminum, one of the most resource demanding materials that exist."

467 comments

  1. strength of bamboo by mandalayx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before you say that bamboo is weak and easily dismembered, here's a quote from the article:

    But Flavio makes me see things differently: Bamboo is a resource of immense potential. And it is strong too. What makes it possible to build bicycles from it is that it is stronger than steel when strained in the longitudinal direction, 17% to be exact.

    The main point of the article, of course, is that bamboo is much more environmentally friendly than metals while being extraordinarily plentiful.

    1. Re:strength of bamboo by gwernol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Before you say that bamboo is weak and easily dismembered, here's a quote from the article:

      "But Flavio makes me see things differently: Bamboo is a resource of immense potential. And it is strong too. What makes it possible to build bicycles from it is that it is stronger than steel when strained in the longitudinal direction, 17% to be exact."


      While resistence to longitudinal stress is a good thing, many of the strains on the frame of a bike are not longitudinal - there is a lot of lateral flexing as you pedal. Bamboo is prone to splitting and fracturing when under lateral strain. I would really hate to have one of those collapse under me due to lateral stress fractures. All those sharp slivers of bamboo right under my crotch? No thanks...

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
    2. Re:strength of bamboo by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before you say that bamboo is weak and easily dismembered [snip] What makes it possible to build bicycles from it is that it is stronger than steel when strained in the longitudinal direction, 17% to be exact.

      Yes, but steel/aluminum won't rot, won't get eaten by bugs, are stronger in NON-logitudinal directions(ie, twisting- think about when you pump the pedals holding the handlebars, yes, you're twisting pieces of the frame!)...and when they fail, they (usually) just bend. Bamboo cracks, and then it just disintegrates.

    3. Re:strength of bamboo by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      holy crap! well, I guess I'll have to make sure to tell all my biking buddies to make sure that all strain exerted on their bikes is "in the longitudinal direction," versus the normal strains that are put on bikes (twists, various directions, etc).

      And next time I'm hit by an suv while riding a bike, I'll be sure glad the bike shattered into bits instead of staying in one relative piece!

      Did the people who did this previous work in MS's "innovation" department???

    4. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "previous" = "previously"

    5. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but steel/aluminum won't rot, won't get eaten by bugs

      Hmmm yes, what we really need is an environmentally friendly biodegradable substance that won't rot or get eaten by bugs. Best of both worlds.

    6. Re:strength of bamboo by Jahf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is very little chance of that based on the way they are using the sticks. No drilling or cutting means the pole remains very stable. Sure, if you use it for extreme biking you're going to have problems, but otherwise it should remain quite solid.

      Add to that the possibility of very simple reinforcement by wrapping it at key points with a strong thread and/or laminating it with reinforcements and I doubt it would break under normal usage.

      Even if it did, you would see signs of wear before it happened. What causes catastrophic failure of bamboo is usually force being applied on bamboo that has been cut into the grain and/or had holes cut into it.

      Of course, that doesn't stop it from being fugly ... I would definitely be getting out some paint!

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    7. Re:strength of bamboo by jackalope · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's it! The cheese whiz bicycle! Won't rot, won't get eaten, and plentiful too!

    8. Re:strength of bamboo by Ed+Avis · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bamboo canes are hollow, right? So just use aluminium rods with bamboo cladding round the outside. You get a strong and stable bike, and still get all the eco-friendly posing opportunities. It's not as if anyone will try to cut the bamboo open to see if you're cheating.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    9. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Rush Hour 2, was there a building in Hong Kong made of Bamboo?

    10. Re:strength of bamboo by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure it is funny, but the bamboo society is missing a fundenmental point...

      I disagree with this non-environmental friendly stuff regarding Aluminum and Steel. These two metals are some of most recycled materials that there are. What do you think happens to old ships, cars, buildings? They are not buried, but smelted again.

      In fact this is the beauty of these metals. They can be essentially recycled 100% unlike plastics and papers that always need additives. The reason we do not know about this is because steel and aluminum have been recycled for decades...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    11. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that's smart. You cite that wear would be obvious, but then you're going to paint it. Sorry, but paint that would add looks and be durable enough to not flake or peel under the typical flex and stress which the bamboo frame would undergo would also almost necessarily remove any chance that a regular, visual inspection would shown bamboo wear. It'd be covered up.

      Equipment failure isn't the leading cause of bike accidents; driver or rider stupidity is. However, bike equipment fails a lot more than people think. On a person by person basis, the chances are low. Start mass production and then add the numbers up.

    12. Re:strength of bamboo by Maimun · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I wonder what a material scientist would reply to that (I am not one). Steel is not one thing, you know. Neither are bamboo or aluminium alloys, of course.
      • What kind of steel? If the author means ordinary steel in his comparison, for sure high-quality steel would be stronger than bamboo. Mountain bikes, AFAIK, use fairly high quality alloys, be that steel or aluminium.
      • Under what longtitudal force---sorry, I don't know the terms in English---pushing the ends towards each other, or pulling the ends apart? (AFAIK, in the first case the shape of the cross-section is crucial.)
      • Typically, a material under increasing force goes through ellastic transformation (sorry, missing the term again) when the original shape recovers once the force is removed; then plastic transofrmation that leaves permanent damages; then is breaks. So, what is the 17% advantage of bamboo, is it that the rod stays in the ellastic zone under 17% bigger force? Or is it that the force that breaks it is 17% bigger?
      • A bamboo rod has---again, missing the word---"segments" about 30cm long that have "joint" between them. I would think that the joints are the weak point. A steel rod of the type that is found in bikes is has uniform structure, without such joints. Methinks this is an advantage for the metal one.
      • Further, the metal rod can be given appropriate shaping. On my bike for instance, the two rods that go between the stem of the seat post and the rear wheel are bent slightly to the inside at the place where the rear brakes are attached. In this way, they (the rods) bend less (to the outside) when the rear brakes are used. This stiffness means more efficient stopping. If the two rods were made of bamboo, they would be straight and thus more prone to bending to the outside once the brakes are pressed.
    13. Re:strength of bamboo by MrLint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well I think the solution is clear. Laminate the bamboo with carbon fiber:)

    14. Re:strength of bamboo by Angry+Pixie · · Score: 1

      In Hong Kong, where using steel can get very expensive, Chinese construction workers use frames and girders built from bamboo. The material has been very effective in aiding the construction of highrises while lowering costs. Go figure.

    15. Re:strength of bamboo by jjq · · Score: 1

      I really prefer this one: http://www.orientalglamour.com/chinese%20products% 20wholesale/bamboodecoration9.jpg More bamboo!

    16. Re:strength of bamboo by beaverfever · · Score: 1

      I'm sure these people are aware of this, but in a bicycle design lateral strength is an issue too. I didn't have the patience to read the whole article so perhaps that was addressed too.

      (editing out the fluff and getting to the point would have been nice - this thing reads like a sunday newspaper piece gone mad - I'm not interested in his black currant whatevers)

    17. Re:strength of bamboo by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Add to that the possibility of very simple reinforcement by wrapping it at key points with a strong thread and/or laminating it with reinforcements...

      Once again, duct tape saves my ass (and other stuff).

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    18. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, old ships that are no longer servicable are usually scuttled (towed out to sea and sunk)...

    19. Re:strength of bamboo by Lord_Breetai · · Score: 1

      pushing the ends towards each other, or pulling the ends apart

      Those are compressive and tensile, respectively.

      --
      "You are only young once, but you can be immature forever." -www.animemusicvideos.org
    20. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody is concerned with the bamboo in the bicycle breaking under stress. The article says these "bambucicletas" are glued together! I'd be much more concerned about that.

    21. Re:strength of bamboo by Wavicle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think that's true. According to this greenpeace site, 95% of a ship is recycleable material. Their beef is that these ships are sitting on beaches in asian countries while the non-recyclable 5% of them are pollutants being released into the environment. That and workers dismantling the ships without protection.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    22. Re:strength of bamboo by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Chinese construction workers use frames and girders built from bamboo

      frames and girders? are you talking about scaffolding? if so, use the right word 'cause "frames and girders" makes it sound like they build the highrise itself from bamboo, which they certainly do NOT.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    23. Re:strength of bamboo by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      One thing that affects bicycle life-span around Toronto is security. Are they going to make the bicycle locks out of bamboo too?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    24. Re:strength of bamboo by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 3, Funny
      Hmmm yes, what we really need is an environmentally friendly biodegradable substance that won't rot or get eaten by bugs. Best of both worlds.

      or pandas....
    25. Re:strength of bamboo by klevin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, but what's required in order to refine raw aluminum (or what ever you call the ore)? Lots and lots of electricity. How's that electricity produced? Power plants that: burn coal/natural gas (leading to air pollution), use nuclear fision (all sorts of nasty biproducts that we still haven't figured out what to do with, other than bury them), or hydroelectric dams (don't even get me started here).

      Recycling aluminum & steel reduces the problem, but even that requires large amounts of energy (see above).

    26. Re:strength of bamboo by Remote · · Score: 1

      Steel rots.

    27. Re:strength of bamboo by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      Hmmm yes, what we really need is an environmentally friendly biodegradable substance that won't rot or get eaten by bugs. Best of both worlds.

      Funny as it is, it's not impossible. You can - theoretically - produce a biodegradable substance that won't rot in a given period of time (and won't get eaten by bugs because it will naturally repel them). However, the easiest way to obtain it would probably be some sort of transgenetic manipulation - and the environmentalists wouln't be happy about it.

    28. Re:strength of bamboo by Arker · · Score: 1

      That's true, but the bigger problem here is that they are hand-made and individually crafted, and must be that way. You could mass produce them, but only by compromising the way he's doing it entirely, by using the bamboo to serve the steel instead of the other way around to paraphrase the guy in the article. In order to do this right you really have to start from the bamboo you have and design the bike around that, instead of the other way around. So as nice as this is in its own way, there's no way it could ever replace regular bike building techniques.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    29. Re:strength of bamboo by Zagar · · Score: 1

      Jackie Chan did a nice action scene in Rush Hour 2 involving bamboo scaffolds.

      --
      YAFIRL (Yet another Free iPods referral link)
    30. Re:strength of bamboo by chriso11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow - the way you phrase that it gives the impression that envirionmentalists are like boogiemen just waiting to leap out at you.

      Actaually, rotting is not as great a problem. Plain wood can last a long time - look at the many hundred+ year old buildings around. Also, redwood is naturally resistant to rot.

      Finally, if you make the bike somewhat modular, it would be possible to periodically replace sections which show any signs of damage or rot.

      My main question, which the article really didn't address (or I misses it), is price. Obviously, the first article must have been expensive. But how low could these get in volume production?

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    31. Re:strength of bamboo by Angry+Pixie · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm not in the construction business... just a girl with a cable subscription ;) But, yes I meant scaffolding.

    32. Re:strength of bamboo by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1

      Bauxite? that is about as raw as you can get it, really...

    33. Re:strength of bamboo by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      I think it's beautiful and I want one!

      --
      This space available.
    34. Re:strength of bamboo by CrowScape · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, we do know what to do with by products of nuclear fission, it's just that when Carter was president he signed a presidential order banning the reclimation of spent fuel rods. Plus, if our youngest plants weren't 30 years old we'd be far more efficient and produce less waste. Japan and France seem to be doing just fine with 80% of their power being derived from nuclear sources.

      So, we can't use oil because of air pollution
      We can't use natural gas because we have to drill for it and build pipelines
      We can't use nuclear because the tiny ammount of byproducts produced over time will be around for a long while.
      We can't use dams because of local environmental concerns (yet we can put up with an over population of beavers doing the same thing)
      We can't use wind because it'll kill endangered birds and the whole "Not in our backyard" mentality
      We can't use tidal generators because it'll kill dolphins

      That leaves us with solar... we're screwed!

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    35. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that the joints are the weak point.

      Actually, in my experience, the nodes (joints) are nigh-indestructible. They are a lot denser than the straight, hollow internode sections, and it's the latter that break under stress. If it weren't for the periodic reinforcement at the nodes, I think bamboo would be a lot weaker.

      Rememember that this is a plant, so the whole thing has grown as one structure -- it's not like the segments have been glued together. It's actually quite a complicated structure.

    36. Re:strength of bamboo by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Funny
      That leaves us with solar... we're screwed!

      Well, that's why to choose bamboo. Its very easily produced with solar power...

      --
      This space available.
    37. Re:strength of bamboo by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Informative
      A bamboo rod has---again, missing the word---"segments" about 30cm long that have "joint" between them. I would think that the joints are the weak point.

      clearly you've never touched a piece of bamboo in your life. Those "joints" are stronger than the rest. Incredibly strong. It's vitually impossible to break bamboo there... it breaks in the "segment" first.

      --
      This space available.
    38. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      We can't use solar, 'cause it takes up too much of the desert, displacing lizards and sand fleas.

      We can't use solarvoltaics, because they require the use if REALLY nasty shit to produce them.

      Looks like the only thing we can use is degassing shit.

    39. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you brag about recycling, mountains are being destroyed for fresh metals.

    40. Re:strength of bamboo by gotr00t · · Score: 1

      Actually, its spelled "cheez whiz". And also note that what I just said was a trademark of Kraft.

    41. Re:strength of bamboo by binarybum · · Score: 4, Funny

      hmm. no, most environmentalists aren't level headed enough to wait to leap out at you. They're usually leaping out before you even get there.

      --
      ôó
    42. Re:strength of bamboo by Avihson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why worry about the glue? All "stick and cloth" aircraft such as the SPAD, Foker, Sopwith, Stearman, etc had spruce wing spars and ribs that were built with animal glue. The glue is stronger than the wood it connects. I wonder what holds all those carbon fibers together in the modern composite bike. Could it be a glue like epoxy?

    43. Re:strength of bamboo by gessel · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think the bamboo bike is really cool from a cost perspective, but it's not really any more renewable than an aluminum one, nor having a net advantageous resource budget despite the obvious, intuitive expectation that it would.

      The matter system on this planet is closed loop.

      While this is not entirely true, some 40,000 tons of space borne dust land on our planet and we may someday mine extra-planetary bodies, for arguments sake all the aluminum we're going to use is here now. If we continue to use it all the bauxite will be gone some day, and from then on, all aluminum will be recycled.

      However, long before that day all aluminum will be recycled because it costs 20X as much to make aluminum from Bauxite as it does to remelt it from scrap. The aluminum industry uses all the scrap aluminum it can get because the final product is just as valuable as aluminum from ore, but the profit is very different.

      So aluminium the matter is a renewable resource, just like the carbon in bamboo, except to reuse aluminum it need merely be remelted via heat (typically electrical power, though a solar furnace could be used), and the carbon in bamboo must be oxidized and reduced (typically by rotting or burning and then photosynthesis).

      Most domestic aluminum production happens in the pacific northwest where the power is provided by dams, a renewable resource, but certainly much of it is provided by oxidizing hydrocarbons to produce CO2 and H2O, both end state products that require substantial energy to reduce to reduce back to something chemically useful. This return cycle of oxidized hydrocarbon energy production is managed by the biomass of the world, and is driven by solar power via photosynthesis at 0.2% net efficiency, just as bamboo production is.

      The energy system on this planet is constant rate

      All energy on this planet comes from the sun. The sun has provided a net energy surplus for a few million years, most of it stored in reduced hydrocarbons (about half in oil and half in methane hydrates, and a comparatively inconsequential amount in leftover fissile heavy atoms). The world's total carbon reserves (1.6E13 bbls oil equivalent) contain enough energy to provide current consumption (globally 1.2E14 Kwh/year) rates for 221 years. If the rest of the world catches up with US consumption rates all the reduced carbon in the world will only last 38 years.

      So, sooner or later (within 200 years, longer if there's a big global war or other population reducing event, much shorter if growth continues) all our energy will come from solar power directly as we will have consumed the planets "life savings" of net reduced carbon.

      Photosynthesis is 0.2% efficient. Photovoltaics are currently about 10% efficient (20X more) in commercial applications (7.5% efficient over the life of the device) and efficiencies of over 30% are achievable.

      To meet next year's global energy demands (1.2E14 Kwh, not including firewood) would take only 6.5E7 M2 of commercially available solar panels for $1.3E10 at current retail. The world will spend $4.4E11 on oil alone next year. If we spent 5% extra on oil (global tax) we could fully fund global solar power within a year. Interestingly, to meet the US's entire current energy demands with solar electric, we would need to cover about half of our roads, at no net change in albumen.

      Within 200 years, and probably within 50, all the energy used in the production of aluminum will be direct solar.

      Bamboo vs. Aluminum just isn't that obvious

      Bamboo is a very impressive material, basically a single orientation composite, which can be easily reinforced against torsion and it's comparatively low modulus can be compensated for with larger diameter tubes in a bicycle, but it is not obvious that it's a more efficient use of land to grow bamboo than to use solar power to recycle aluminum into new bicycles.

      But we have a long way to go on energy use and recycling, and so bamboo is an o

    44. Re:strength of bamboo by stalinvlad · · Score: 0
      Eh?

      Tell me your taking the piss please!

      Bamboo!

      ffs YOU CRAZY KNOB HEADS!

      PS Makes removing mint look easy

    45. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      These planes had more "horse power" in the glue than in the engine.

    46. Re:strength of bamboo by Insanity · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      GASP!! NO, not the mountain! That big, cold, unfeeling rock? Oh, the humanity.

      --
      Nix absolutably seriousness.
    47. Re:strength of bamboo by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

      Re: Nuclear waste:


      Socrates takes a look at the issue

      While the debate doesn't end with that article, it's nevertheless interesting.

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    48. Re:strength of bamboo by Maimun · · Score: 1

      I have touched bamboo, but never tried to break one. So I will take your word for the joints :)

    49. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...Well, from the picture, they are not using bamboo-to-bamboo interfaces at the high-stress areas (head tube-top/down tubes or bottom bracket shell), but are using metal lugs, much like many of the newer carbon-fiber racing bikes are again, so one does not have to make difficult carbon fiber-based lugs (like Trek's carbon bikes have). The results are not quite as pretty as a Trek, but if it's lighter and works, this usually trumps everything for most bike riders...

      So the metal lugs take care of the complicated stresses at these points and only transmit compression/tension stresses to the bamboo tubes, and minimize torsion stresses along a given tube (probably by using "oversize" bamboo tubes also).

      Another advantage to this is, if you crack a top tube in a crash, I would think it is relatively cheap to get a new tube put back in, instead of having to throw away the entire bike (i.e., Trek 5000-series) frame.

      I know I would probably NOT trust a bamboo handlebar (besides, how would they ever grow a bamboo drop handlebar?), but other than that...

      Yes, I realize that this article is about bikes for third-world countries, but if some sort of mandate from UCI came about to use more sustainable materials (if they can do it with bike frame shapes, they could do it with construction techniques and materials as well...) in exchange from deviation from standard "double-diamond" designs, then this affects a rabid, money-spending group of bike consumers...

      While I appreciate some of the tech in the bikes that pro bike racers use, I know that for 99% of bike racers, it does not make the difference between winning or losing a bike race, finishing that century, or grabbing a latte across town.
      It is a bit like buying a ferarri to buy groceries and run errands.

      Those who have the $$$ (or think or want to project that they do) will always spend it. The rest of us who don't have to look for value.

      It would be cool to buy a Colnago C-40 "ferarri" bike. But it's definitely not worth $7,000. Besides, the people who win bike races simply have better motors than those who don't. Their equipment doesn't matter much, if at all, compared to their peers. If everyone only had Schwinn Varsity's, the people who win bike races now would still be winning the races...

    50. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...the kinds of steel and aluminum alloys used in most high-end EuroAmerican bikes (i.e., not purchased at Wal-Mart, Target, K-Mart) is not the same rolled cold-steel tubes that the cheapest bikes use.

      The bikes that the bamboo bike is hoped to eventually replace weigh about 40-50 lbs unloaded. They are BEASTS.

      Remember, in Asia, they build skyscrapers using bamboo scaffolding.

      The article mentions "longitudinal" loads (compression/tension), rather than torsional or bending loads.

      As far as the rear triangle on your bike, that is specific to your bike. A bamboo bike could use a unistay (i.e., single piece goes from seat tube to a metal crown, where the seatstays then go to the rear dropouts), where the brake is clamped to the crown, and be just as "efficient" as your bike.

      For 90% of the bikes sold and used in the world, they're NOT used for barrelling down single-track or alpine descents. They are used on flat streets at not much above walking pace. Braking efficieny is not a concern (as long as the brakes can lock the wheels with reasonable force, they're good enough).

    51. Re:strength of bamboo by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      That was one of the best posts I've ever read here. Wish I had a mod point.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    52. Re:strength of bamboo by Zugok · · Score: 1

      what's more in Hongkong, they STILL routinely use bamboo for scaffolding when they are reparing or building structures. I should think that the use it for the skyscrapers however. Bambooo is strong, do doubt about that.

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    53. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not see any brakes on the contraption. how the hell is one supposed to stop? Deploy a bamboo umbrella?

    54. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      except it'll weigh 50 lbs

    55. Re:strength of bamboo by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      In HK we use bamboo scaffolding becasue it's much ,ighter than steel pipe. So it can be aeasily supported by attachments to the building. However, it soen't last long, (though it doesn;t need to).

      Anyway, as for the "environmentally sound" comment made in the orignal post, it's complete bull. I have a steel bike that's 22 years old. It's fine. I think the 5 kgs of steel that make up its tubing is not a grat burden on the earth, and steel is recyclable and non-poisonous. A bamboo bike would be lucky to last a single year before it became dangerous. There are all kinds of bugs, moulds and fungus that attack bamboo and the failure of a single tube in a bike frame could be lethal if it happened at speed or in traffic, not to mention the very sharp splinters that bamboo makes. As for cost, it's the frame fittings (like bottom bracket), and gears that make up the main cost of a normal bike. I'm sure that this bike will cost much more than a similarly specced steel one, and be in the landfill along with its parts long before it too.

    56. Re:strength of bamboo by Syre · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      This post covers the topic in DEPTH!

    57. Re:strength of bamboo by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 1
      First, yes, carbon fiber and fiberglass are held together with epoxy. That's what makes the distinctive chemical smell of curing composites (just think of it as "offspring improver"). If you want to see some fiberglass in its natural state, take a look at the insulation in a house under construction. It looks kind of fluffy without anything holding it together (appearances are deceiving, though: if you rub up against it, you'll get thousands of glass fibers stuck in your skin. Ouch).

      Second, wood acts as a sort of "natural composite". It's light, strong in one direction, and breaks easily if you bend the wrong way. If a wood plane is designed well, it It's also really easy to work with; many inexpensive kit planes and homebuilts are still wood and cloth. I'd imagine that bamboo, being one of the strongest woods available, would be a great material for bikes: not only cheap and renewable, but also much lighter than steel and possibly competitive with aluminum.

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    58. Re:strength of bamboo by FFFish · · Score: 1

      What do you think happens to old ships, cars, buildings? They are not buried, but smelted again.

      You've never actually been to a garbage dump / landfill, have you?

      You should make a visit some day. It'll inform your worldview significantly.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    59. Re:strength of bamboo by JonToycrafter · · Score: 1

      Wow...I'm totally blown away by this. Thank you! As someone else said, one of the best posts (of thousands and thousands) I've ever read. Wish I had a mod point.

    60. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never seen an automobile shredder, have you?

      Ever seen a magnetic crane load shredded iron and steel onto a ship destined for an ironworks?

      You should see one some day. It'll inform your worldview significantly.

    61. Re:strength of bamboo by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is in a landfill is a small amount of consumer waste. The consumer can recycle their metal products and get money for it. I know...

      Why do I know about this metal recycling? Because my father used to own a metal stamping company. And it made sense to recycle because you would be given money. Most people do not know that you get MONEY back...

      So sorry, take a look at industry and how it recycles...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    62. Re:strength of bamboo by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      Ok, I looked at the website....

      You are arguing two different points. I said that the industry recycles their metals. And the website proves my point. They recycle, which means it does not end up in land fills or other places.

      The second issue is if the recycling is being carried out in an environmentally friendly manner? Yes it can happen as it does in Europe, but that costs too much. So they moved to other cheaper places. That is an entirely different argument and should not be confused with my original point.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    63. Re:strength of bamboo by Wavicle · · Score: 1

      I think you have your browse settings set too high. I was responding to an Anonymous posting that said old ships are usually scuttled, not recycled. I was agreeing with your post, which is why the website proves your point.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    64. Re:strength of bamboo by jimfrost · · Score: 1
      Well, it's nice that it's so strong in the longitudinal direction because it's really poor at handling torsional loads. You know, like when you're standing up and pedalling.

      Anyway, bamboo and wooden bikes have been around for about a century. There are some reasons why metals and composites are used instead: Like weight, durability, and stiffness.

      --
      jim frost
      jimf@frostbytes.com
    65. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aluminum Does take Bauxite from Jamaica
      or other global deposits, and growing up
      in Washington state I know how electricity
      is vastly used to make aluminum but...
      How many, 200,000,000,000 beer and pop
      cans are used on this planet per year??
      Anyway a large number. But the amount
      of metals used in ALL the bikes manufactured
      in the world is trivial next to beverage cans.
      Kind of like saying that bicycles use a lot
      of (fossil/non-renewal) oil for their lubrication.
      Maybe some thousands of barrels worldwide per
      year?
      Heating and transportation use about 70
      MILLION BARRELS PER DAY - WORLDWIDE.
      blessings to all and to all a goodnight.
      jb
      --

    66. Re:strength of bamboo by tau-lepton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Excellent Points. One problem that needs to be pointed out is that the type of efficiency given for photosynthesis are not the same type of efficiency numbers given for solar panels. One would assume that both of these are the quantum efficiencies of the systems when in fact the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis is between 6 and 9%. The lower 0.2 percent figure may take into account the following issues (taken from lecture by Dr. Tad W. Patzek) 1. C3 crops are at maximum photosynthesis rate at 1/5 of full sunlight, so 4/5 must be dissipated as heat (experiments in laboratories are performed at low light intensity) 2. Crops do not cover the entire field area. 3. Upper leafs form an unbroken canopy, which blocks sunlight from lower ones. 4. In areas far from the equator, the ambient temperature is too low for appreciable photosynthesis. E11, Prof. Tad W. Patzek 3 5. At temperatures higher than 30 degrees C, photorespiration losses are high. 6. Water shortage and deficiencies in trace elements limit plant growth. 7. CO2 at 360 ppm is frequently a limiting factor. C3 plants can double or triple photosynthesis rate in augmented CO2 . After these factors are taken into account the yield efficiency is approximately 0.5 percent. The post specifies 0.2 percent. I have not seen a number this low in the literature. Also 20 * 0.2% is 4% not 10%. Did the post intend to use 0.5% for efficiency of photosynthesis? ( 20 * 0.5% = 10%). "authors undermine their case by making inaccurate claims" Some of these factors also apply to solar panels. Which reduces the efficiency to an extent.

    67. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the choice of coal, nuclear or hydroelectic, this nut job labels hydroelectic as the most environmentally harmful.

      Airheads like these have no hope of actually bettering the world.

    68. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If went purely solar, enviromental doufuses would start complaining about the fact that so much of the earth is covered in solar panels, destroying nature that way. Not to mention the environmental cost of creating the panels.

    69. Re:strength of bamboo by nick_urbanik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here in Hong Kong, where builders scale massively high buildings, climbing only on bamboo scaffolding, I think there is scope for putting more trust in bamboo than you have!

    70. Re:strength of bamboo by Mandelbrute · · Score: 1
      I wonder what a material scientist would reply to that
      Well, I used to be one, but later study flung me into the realms of numerical computing.

      The author of the article has made a common error - confusing strength to weight ratio with strength.

      Stength is the amount of force a given cross-section of material can take before it fails. It's given in units of Newtons per millimeter squared (which is a megapascal) or pounds per squre inch. Failure is either when the material is bend permanantly out of shape (yeild strength) or broken (ultimate tensile strength - if it is broken by pulling).

      Now a piece of the cheapest steel wire you can can get is going to be stronger than the same cross section of the best bamboo, spider silk or carbon fibre re-inforced plastic you can get. With those light materials you just make it thicker if you want to carry the same load, and you still end up with something ligher than the smaller piece of steel. Those materials have a better strength to weight ratio than steel, but you have thinker peices of material taking the load.

      It all comes down to the purpose - you don't want planes or bikes to weigh a lot so you only make the bits that have to be really strong out of steel - say axles and spokes.

      longtitudal force
      That's along the length of the bamboo stems, the direction the fibres run - the bamboo will be strong in that direction under both tension and compression. Under compression it will buckle if you push it hard enough, because it isn't very stiff. The answer is just to use more bamboo.

      material under increasing force goes through ellastic transformation
      Polymers (eg. cellulose in bamboo) behave differently to metals - their behaviour depends on time as well as load, and something that looks like it has permanantly bent out of shape can sometimes slowly return to its old shape. The change from fairly elastic behaviour (double the force and get double the stretch) to plastic behaviour is hard to spot. Metals behave elasticly, you know

      I would think that the joints are the weak point
      Yes, you would just have to design the bike based on the strength of the joint. The same applies with metal bikes, you have to design based on the strength of the weld joint.

      If the two rods were made of bamboo, they would be straight and thus more prone to bending to the outside once the brakes are pressed.
      That means that the bamboo bike would have to be designed a different way to a metal bike. You have to design to use the material, as well as choose the material for the design.
    71. Re:strength of bamboo by lardi · · Score: 1

      check this bamboo bike http://biomega.dk/html/frames/bio.html

    72. Re:strength of bamboo by kcelery · · Score: 1

      Bamboo ladders up to 12 feet tall are common in southern China. Some of them had been in service for over ten years. Bamboo scaffolding has been
      in use over decades. Actually there are formal studies here:

      http://www.oshc.org.hk/b5/paper/Safety%20and%20R el iability%20of%20Bamboo%20Scaffolding_eng%20only.PD F

      The strength per weight of bamboo matches that of steel suggest its potential in bicycle frame.

    73. Re:strength of bamboo by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      Agreed! Very informative, and I just about bust a gut when he said "albumen" instead of "albedo". Solar panels ... cover roads ... no net change in eggwhites.

    74. Re:strength of bamboo by gessel · · Score: 1

      Excellent post.

      My biomass numbers came from a longer non-/. email exchange about long term energy sources. The biomass numbers were in reference to an alternative of using ag-waste as feedstock to a chemical conversion process
      changingworldtech.com, and came from a university class. And I see that between revisions I slipped a decimal - the article says 1/40th, or 2.5%, or perhaps applied a 10% conversion efficiency step somewhere and didn't back it out when I quoted the number.

      The strength of materials numbers came from the Ryerson Catalog (except the strength of music wire, which comes from a music wire company). The Bamboo strength is the weighted results of various references (lab and university results weighted heavily and about 1/2 the strength value quoted by bamboo-centric web sites that apparently did not do primary testing). Aluminum costs and other data were checked against the admittedly biased aluminum association website (www.aluminum.org).

      Your references on biomass conversion are far better and and quite helpful.

      As for the other energy flow references, they were taken from my own emails, but the primary references are:

      climate forcings (greenhouse contributions)
      http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/ forcings/altscen ario/

      Useful energy quantities (also in m&ms as a unit)
      http://newton.umsl.edu/~philf/energies.gif

      Total vegetative consumption
      http://newton.umsl.edu/infophys/lsp.h tml

      Solar irradiance and variation thereof:
      http://spaceresearch.nasa.gov/sts-107/10 7_solcon3. pdf

      Albedo and reflectance
      http://lasp.colorado.edu/~avallone/at oc3500/lectur es/lecture23.htm
      http://eetd.lbl.gov/HeatIsland/P avements/LowerTemp s/

      Detailed ref on solar data: http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/

      Detailed data on solar panel efficiency in real daily light:
      http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy99osti/26909.pd f

      Retail Solar costs http://www.wholesalesolar.com/

      energy consumption data
      http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iea pdf/t0 6_02.pdf

      Energy consumption
      http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/brochure/ infocard01.ht m
      Energy reserves
      http://www.usgs.gov/public/press/public_ affairs/pr ess_releases/pr1183m.html
      http://www.iea.org/g8/w orld/oilsup.htm
      Carbon capacity
      http://www.optimumpopulation.org/opt.af. biocapacit y.html
      Carbon output
      http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming. nsf/Uniq ueKeyLookup/JSIN5DQT4A/$file/ORSummary.PDF
      Solar Costs
      http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:3P2Cj2 FoBIEC: www.ncsc.ncsu.edu/fact/10body.htm+photovoltiac+cel l+cost&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
      Solar Availability
      http://courses.washington.edu/me342/ hw2sol.htm
      Hydrates at SciAm
      http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID= 0009ECC C-3F88-1C75-9B81809EC588EF21
      Hydrates at DOE
      http://www.fe.doe.gov/oil_gas/methanehydrates /
      Hydrates at USGS
      http://marine.usgs.gov/fact-sheets/gas-hydra tes/ti tle.html

    75. Re:strength of bamboo by FFFish · · Score: 1

      I've seen our landfills. They're full of recycleables, including tons and tons of good metal.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    76. Re:strength of bamboo by jo42 · · Score: 1


      Let's run next years Tour de France on these puppies!

    77. Re:strength of bamboo by KshGoddess · · Score: 1

      We can't use solar because the collectors create 'hot spots'

      The only thing left is flatulence, and let's just say the collection process is better left to professionals. :P

      --
      It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
  2. it's been done... by hangingonwords · · Score: 5, Funny

    i've seen this before on a show called gilligans island...

    --
    fact: microsoft > linux
    1. Re:it's been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You better not try to steal my idea for a coconut radio! My patent is pending!

    2. Re:it's been done... by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 2, Informative

      No it hasn't, that was a bamboo car.

      --
      Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
    3. Re:it's been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you think they powered everything on the island?

    4. Re:it's been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhh. It's entertainment. How do you think Lara Croft could tell that the helicopter was going to Hong Kong, like 30 seconds after she put the tracking device on it? Or how the german guy(the same german guy in Driven and SLC Punk) continues to scream while his head is being chomped by the shadow rock guys?

      I'm glad I didn't pay to see that movie.

    5. Re:it's been done... by whiteranger99x · · Score: 5, Funny

      i've seen this before on a show called gilligans island...

      Go figure, the Professor could make Bamboo Bikes, Timeshares, Coconut powered-radios, a nuclear reactor and yet they couldn't simply patch a fucking hole in the goddamn boat, The Minnow...wtf?!

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    6. Re:it's been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so what's this "and the rest" crap?

    7. Re:it's been done... by Tomster · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, Gilligan's Island: the first Reality TV show. "Survivor" is a pale comparison.

    8. Re:it's been done... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah its an old joke, but if memory serves he did fix it but Gilligan managed to sink it or lose it at sea. If they really wanted to get off the island they should have just shot Gilligan with a bamboo gun.

      "Whatcha building there Professor?"

      "Err, something that'll get us off the island and you're going to be the first to leave."

      "Gee, that sounds great Professor! When am I leaving?"

      "Now."

      *bang*

    9. Re:it's been done... by Angry+Pixie · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Mr Wizard (if you youngens rememeber him) taught me to build a low power battery using oranges and copper wire.

      No point here, move along...

    10. Re:it's been done... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Go figure, the Professor could make Bamboo Bikes, Timeshares, Coconut powered-radios, a nuclear reactor and yet they couldn't simply patch a fucking hole in the goddamn boat, The Minnow...wtf?!

      Professor: "Dammit, Skipper, I am an electrical, mechanical, and nuclear engineer, NOT a fucking materials chemist! I was about to start a chemistry degree just after the fucking boat ride, but...."

      (In bounds Gilligan, tripping over the mixing table)

    11. Re:it's been done... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm. I wonder how McGiver would have dealt with Gilligan.

    12. Re:it's been done... by knewman_1971 · · Score: 1

      Someone's been watching MST3K, the movie.

      --
      where is the "I feel for ya, but that's some funny ass shit" moderation?
    13. Re:it's been done... by JMandingo · · Score: 1

      That would have been an obvious ripoff of that classic star trek episode when Kirk shot that nasty Gorn with a bamboo gun stuffed with a giant diamond bullet.

      The coolest part was when Kirk pulled out his pocket version of tha Anarchists Cookbook to get the correct ratio of charcoal, duck poop and fruit loops to make the gun powder.

      --
      Vonnegut was right: Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are, "It might have been."
    14. Re:it's been done... by caldodge · · Score: 1

      Courtesy of Weird Al ...

      "I like the Professor
      He'd always save their butts
      He could build a nuclear reactor from a couple of coconuts
      She said 'That guy's a genius!'
      I shook my head and laughed
      I said 'If he's so fly then tell me why he couldn't build a lousy raft!'"

    15. Re:it's been done... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you only know OF Gilligan's Island. The ultimate fate of the U.S.S. Minnow was revealed in Episode #8 "Good Bye Island" and yes, it was Gilligan's fault!

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    16. Re:it's been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude you seriously need a hobby.

    17. Re:it's been done... by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      If you were stuck on a deserted island with Ginger and Mary Ann, how sincere would *your* efforts to get off the island really be?

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    18. Re:it's been done... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Dude, the professor could ALWAYS fix the boat. He wanted to stay on the island as long as ginger and maryann were there.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    19. Re:it's been done... by Dictator+For+Life · · Score: 1
      That would have been an obvious ripoff of that classic star trek episode when Kirk shot that nasty Gorn

      Dude. Gilligan pre-dated Star Trek by 2 years.

      --

      DFL

      Never send a human to do a machine's job.

    20. Re:it's been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm. I wonder how McGiver would have dealt with Gilligan.

      McGiver would have dealt with Gilligan the same way he dealt with McHello...

    21. Re:it's been done... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      I didn't create the website, I just found it with Google.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    22. Re:it's been done... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If they really wanted to get off the island they should have just shot Gilligan with a bamboo gun.

      There was an episode where they made a bamboo speargun to reenact a murder (back in Hawaii that several of the castaways were suspects in). Gilligan played the victim, and narrowly escaped being harpooned by the speargun...

    23. Re:it's been done... by Seahawk91 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.innersports.org/indiabiketrip.htm

      This guy did it in India about two years ago.

  3. Ummmm..... by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does any one see a set of brakes on this thing?

    Yes, I know that some bikes have the brake mechanism in the hub of the rear wheel, but that doesn't appear in the photo either.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:Ummmm..... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since it's only got one gear, would it be possible to control speed with the chain?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:Ummmm..... by salimfadhley · · Score: 1

      Yes! It is a single speed - Gears, Breaks - these things are not required when the pedals are connected directly to the chain, and the chain is connected to the wheel. You want to slow down... pedal slower.

    3. Re:Ummmm..... by Ewan · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was thinking, so much for utility

    4. Re:Ummmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is possible that it is a fixed gear bike. A fixed gear bike operates sort of like a unicycle. You pedal forwards and the bike goes forward. Pedal backwards and the bike goes backward. So by slowing your pedaling the bike slows down. If this is in fact what the bike's drive train is, I can see why. The system is extremely simple and durable. May want to check out information on track bikes if you want more information.

      jon

    5. Re:Ummmm..... by bj8rn · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Grandparent: I think it does have breaks inside the hub of the rear wheel, look more carefully - there is this metal clamp thingie just near the hub on the chain side of the bike.

      Parent: yeah, right. Imagine this - you're going at full speed. Downhill. You'd better keep your feet as far away from the pedals as possible - if you don't want to break your legs.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    6. Re:Ummmm..... by Manywele · · Score: 1

      What? Single gear bikes are not necessarily direct drive like a unicycle. You can put a ratchet in there so you keep moving even without pedaling (think about going down a steep hill with a direct drive bike). Don't you guys remember that single gear bike you had as a kid that you stopped by pushing backwards on the pedals? I think it had some brake on the rear axle but I wasn't interested in bike mechanics when I was 7, it had nothing visible on the tire though.

    7. Re:Ummmm..... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      many die hard mountain bikers use single speeds, especially for training. These are DIRECTLY tied to the wheel, no coasting action what so ever. (although they DO have normal handbrakes brakes, running without is just plain stupid, you use those for quick emergency stops only)

    8. Re:Ummmm..... by YeOldeGnurd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Parent: yeah, right. Imagine this - you're going at full speed. Downhill. You'd better keep your feet as far away from the pedals as possible - if you don't want to break your legs.


      This bike might have a internal coaster brake, like kids' bikes, or may very well be a fixed gear bike. These things do exist and are perfectly suitable to most urban environments (with the possible exeption of cities like San Francisco). Going downhill you DON'T take your feet off the pedals, you just control your descent by spinning at the right speed. It's actually a better system than relying on brake pads once you get competent using a fixie.
      --
      ...Nothing interesting here. Just move along...
    9. Re:Ummmm..... by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      Parent: yeah, right. Imagine this - you're going at full speed. Downhill. You'd better keep your feet as far away from the pedals as possible

      My first two bikes both had this style of single gear chain based breaking. It's actually fairly common, especially in little kiddie bmx bikes and the like.

    10. Re:Ummmm..... by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1

      But that is extremely dangerous for going downhill though. If you get fast enough that you cannot get your feet back on the pedals then you are in big trouble!

    11. Re:Ummmm..... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I think the brakes are attached to the bottom of your legs.

      Actually, I agree with everyone else that it's a fixed gear mechanism.

    12. Re:Ummmm..... by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      This bike might have a internal coaster brake, like kids' bikes, or may very well be a fixed gear bike. These things do exist and are perfectly suitable to most urban environments (with the possible exeption of cities like San Francisco).
      Nope -- freak-o bike messenger types ride those things, even here in San Francisco. Fixies are quite a fad among those guys, actually. They'll probably tell you it means less moving parts, so less potential for failure during a day of extensive riding ... about the only thing that can break is your chain or your headset ... maybe you could chip a tooth off your gear ... or maybe your frame could crack.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    13. Re:Ummmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent: yeah, right. Imagine this - you're going at full speed. Downhill. You'd better keep your feet as far away from the pedals as possible - if you don't want to break your legs.

      You've obviously never seen a messenger on a track bike.

    14. Re:Ummmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No there are no brakes. It's because it's a direct drive brike. To brake, just pedal backwards.

    15. Re:Ummmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And twice the exercise, you work hard going uphill and down. Don't try it without pedal clips, and only the most hardcore remove the front brake. Great quick workout and a blast to ride.

    16. Re:Ummmm..... by bolind · · Score: 2, Informative

      These are DIRECTLY tied to the wheel, no coasting action what so ever.

      Nope. It is true that many die hard MTB'ers ride Single Speeds, but there's always a freewheel/coasting capability. Imagine trying to clear a tehnical rock section without being able to keep your pedal arms horizontal.

    17. Re:Ummmm..... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Yeah, unicycling downhill is a bitch.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    18. Re:Ummmm..... by Lobsang · · Score: 1

      Does any one see a set of brakes on this thing?
      Yes, I know that some bikes have the brake mechanism in the hub of the rear wheel, but that doesn't appear in the photo either.


      Brakes transform your momentum into heat and thus are an environmental no-no. You don't want to add more heat to mother Earth's atmosphere, do you? do you???

      Just crash with the bike and let your bones absorb the impact. That's the ecologically correct way to stop bikes.

    19. Re:Ummmm..... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      It is true that many die hard MTB'ers ride Single Speeds, but there's always a freewheel/coasting capability.

      Nope, he is right there are fixed gear bikes, they are usually used in velodrome racing, but they do make fixed gear mountain bikes too. See these articles for some tech info.

      I could imagine a fixed gear mountain bike being very good in the mud, I know people like them for snow...

      But I don't get down like that, I'm a roadie...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    20. Re:Ummmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fixed gears or coaster brakes are not a replacement for a front brake. Braking force is transmitted to the frame though the axles which are below the center of gravity of bike+rider. In hard emergency braking, bike and rider pitch forward putting more force through the front wheel and reducing that on the rear wheel. The unweighted rear wheel is less capable of braking and thus locks up and skids.

  4. Question the first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look closely at the picture. Now, tell my where the breaks are?

    1. Re:Question the first. by gantrep · · Score: 1

      Umm, maybe there aren'ts any "breaks" because it isn't "broken"?

  5. Bear alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This would work fine, except that pandas eat bamboo. Better not get into a forest with that bike.

  6. Seems like a hoax... by fmita · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're probably just trying to bamboozle us...

    1. Re:Seems like a hoax... by VistaBoy · · Score: 1

      I think you've been spending too much time drinking the bamBooze.

    2. Re:Seems like a hoax... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're trying too hard... and failing at being funny I'm afraid.

    3. Re:Seems like a hoax... by 955301 · · Score: 0

      I agree. Anyone who turns up with an idea such as this must be pretty strange. I bet if you spoke with his ex-girlfriend, she'll tell you he's a stalker.

      Three in one, cha-ching!

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    4. Re:Seems like a hoax... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Rimshot* Ba-dum-Psh!

  7. At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A power source for the coconut shortwave.

    1. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would still need a dynamo.

  8. Gilligan and the Professor Rejoice by pgrote · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Born in Pennsylvania, Gilligan worked at a gas station before joining the Navy where he saved the life of the captain, becoming his "little buddy." In gratitude, when the Skipper started his own charter business, he hired Gilligan to be his first mate despite his incompetence. Gilligan's childlike nature makes him the perfect errand boy often performing many of the menial tasks on the island such as riding the Professor's generator bike, acting as manservant to Mr. Howell or collecting coconuts for the girls. It should be noted, some claim Gilligan's first name is "Willy", though none has been able to prove it."

    TV Land Rules

    1. Re:Gilligan and the Professor Rejoice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? How is this not off-topic

  9. Yeah, but... by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

    It's those little strips of bark that hold the bamboo together that are keeping the industry from taking off...

    --
    "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
  10. So how do I explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How likely are insurance companies going to reimburse me when my bike burns to the ground?

    Or is taken down by termites?

    Or causes splinters after a bad road crash?

    Will they insist on brakes?

  11. More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is the poster serious ?


    Aluminum makes up 8 percent of the crust of this damn planet. http://www.csulb.edu/~rodrigue/geog140/lectures/cr ustmaterials.html

    1. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by RiffRafff · · Score: 5, Informative

      He's prolly referring to raw aluminum. Extracting it consumes way too much electricity. Of course, recycling aluminum takes very little.

      --
      "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    2. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by jfengel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but it's never found in its pure form. It takes a lot of energy to get workable aluminum out of the ore. You've got to heat it to 2300K, which takes a lot of energy. One report said that production of 1 kg of aluminum dumps 44 kg of CO2 into the air.

      In this case it's not so much the energy costs or the pollution as the fact that poor countries just don't have the energy to go around.

    3. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by bic2k · · Score: 1

      The point is the amount of resources it takes to process Aluminum. It has to be mined then processes in plants that use tons of water and chemicals to provide a pure form of aluminum. I'm sure there are many steps inbetween, but compare it to going to a bamboo outcrop and cutting some bamboo down... you get the idea.

      --
      --- its to bad about the monkey, I kinda liked them
    4. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by intermodal · · Score: 1
      That's true, but when you look at the resources required to refine the stuff...(from this site):

      Although it is so widely used today, aluminium has only recently come into use. This is because aluminium is so strongly attracted to oxygen that it can only berefined using huge amounts of electrical energy and electricity did not become readily available until this century. Thus, it is sometimes known as the metal of the 20th century, just as iron was the metal of the 19th century.

      Although electricity is relatively more plentiful and less expensive than it used to be,refining aluminium from its ore is still a costly process. This is why aluminium is often recycled. This way we do not have to "waste" energy refining more of the metal than we need to.
      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    5. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      One report said that production of 1 kg of aluminum dumps 44 kg of CO2 into the air.

      That HAS to be a lie! If there was really that much, we'd all be crushed!

    6. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see aluminum grow more aluminim.

    7. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      1% of the electricty used in the whole of the UK is used in a single plant that extracts aluminium from its ore.

      It's a very energy-demanding process to produce Al.

    8. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, but it's never found in its pure form. It takes a lot of energy to get workable aluminum out of the ore. You've got to heat it to 2300K, which takes a lot of energy. One report said that production of 1 kg of aluminum dumps 44 kg of CO2 into the air.

      It's not the electricity or energy so much- aluminum is extracted via electrolysis- but the enormous amount of electricity for this is often taken from hydroelectric plants which doesn't generate much CO2 (except during construction of the dam).

      However, the electrolysis uses carbon electrodes and they are used up by the process, they react with oxygen ions to produce CO2- and that's where a lot of the CO2 comes from.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    9. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aluminum is extracted by electrolysis. therefore the only energy you need is electrical.

      and guess where most of the world's aluminum extraction plants are located? next to big dams with hydroelectric generators! if that's not low impact resource management, i don't know what is.

    10. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case it's not so much the energy costs or the pollution as the fact that poor countries just don't have the energy to go around.

      Maybe my english is failing or something, but wouldn't that mean that it is the energy costs?

    11. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Good point. I'd meant that it isn't the global energy cost (e.g. running out of oil) as the fact that in these countries, there just isn't very much electricity for aluminum plants. In the US, aluminum is cheap, because we have rivers to provide such things. It would be more expensive in other places.

      Of course, you could just ship bulk aluminum, or aluminum tubes. For me, the important part of the article is the overall coolness in building a bike from whatever you've got lying around. Aluminum is cheap, but not nearly as cheap as bamboo. When you've got nearly nothing, the difference between "cheap" and "free" is all the difference in the world.

    12. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by muzzmac · · Score: 1

      AND Bauxite (Raw Aluminium) is very distressing when shoved up a small childs own nose.

      Trust me. I was once a small child and it was very distressing.

    13. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by azpcox · · Score: 1

      So plant lots of bamboo around the Aluminum plants... They could even hide the aluminum plant altogether if you plant the tall kind...

      --
      What exactly do you mean by "Don't touch this button?"
    14. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by VPN3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think it's that big of a deal when it comes to bikes. The only bikes made from aluminum are the mid to high end bikes in the $500-$1500 range. The amount of aluminum used in these bikes is less than 6 pounds, typically. Most of the bike's weight is due to the gearing system, tires, strut system, crank and chain. These guys seem to be focusing on the low-end, buy your bike at Kmart crowd.

      If you look closely at the design of an aluminum bike, you can tell not many resources are used as they use the least for weight purposes. I know the frame on my Cannondale is a couple of millimeters thick. The rigidness comes from thin walls on a fat tube.

      Aluminum bikes aren't going to be around for much longer anyway, the price range for a good aluminum bike gets you right up there with titanium and magnesium alloy frames, which are superior in my opinion. Most of the trim parts consist of carbon fiber (wheels and forks on the better bikes use this).

      I am not sure what the point in this article is. There are far greater wastes of resources in new car design as well as the actual bottling process of cans. If the media, or anyone else cared enough to be earth friendly, we'd do it in ways that were actually beneficial. Not by purchasing organic bikes.

      A note on steel bikes. They aren't taking into consideration the actual alloys used when doing the comparison. No bikes are made with 100% steel. They use various alloies in the process.

      I'm picky on this subject after commuting soley by bike for a few years. I would not trust my riding on busy city streets to an organic material, I'd much prefer the comfort of knowing the materials are consistent due to the manufacture process involved with metals. I highly doubt the bamboo is nearly as consistent if measured across the bike's whole frame.

    15. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but, yet, US aluminum plants are being closed due to cheap Asian imports (look up "intalco" in Google).

    16. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Much better to work on making bamboo beer cans than bicycles, consdidering the amount of Al consumed by the average Joe in every sixpack. Or go back to refillable glass bottles.

      On a tangent, in Thailand you can buy snacks of steamed rice with various goodies, cooked inside a section of bamboo. Buy them outside Hualampung Station before going on long train trips.

    17. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by jnik · · Score: 1
      The only bikes made from aluminum are the mid to high end bikes in the $500-$1500 range.
      Uh, I spent $200 on my bike and it's an aluminum frame. It's VERY common these days; it's just a matter of your preference. Cheap MTB's are more likely to be steel; road bikes more likely aluminum. I ride a hybrid. And in any case, I'd hardly say most of the weight is outside of the frame. Significant amount, sure. Most? Nah.

      I do find the issue of "sustainability of bicycles" hilarious though. Frames last damn near forever, barring crashes, and there's not that much metal in them. Figure in the zero emissions and very low wear on the road and the environmental impact's negligable compared to most other means of transportation.

    18. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by Kalak · · Score: 1

      I guess the $100 aluminum bike with crappy parts I saw at our good friend Wal-Mart was an illusion. When was the last time you went low-end bike shopping? I didn't bother with the alumninum since with the extra 50lbs I'm carrying around, th e2 lbs it may have saved on the frame just didn't make a difference. (*sigh*)

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    19. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      It's been a few years. I am forever 2 years off with my shopping information. :)

  12. Aluminuminuminuminum by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    expecially in contrast to aluminum, one of the most resource demanding materials that exist.

    That's funny. Aluminum is indeed expensive to extract and process and that's why it's also the most recycled mineral(?) in existence.

    1. Re:Aluminuminuminuminum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Recycling aluminum is almost as resource intensive as making virgin aluminum. For cans, rolled steel is much more eco-friendly.

      Aluminum was once so valuable that it was used to cap the Washington Monument.

    2. Re:Aluminuminuminuminum by big+tex · · Score: 1

      Actually, that title belongs to Steel. Over 95% of structural steel used today is recycled. The AISC (American Inst. of Steel Contstruction) has a nifty video where they recycle a Oldsmobible into a I-Beam in under 48 hours during a convention.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
  13. Attacked By Endangered Species by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is all good until someone gets attacked by a Panda. Yet another version of "meals on wheels!"

    1. Re:Attacked By Endangered Species by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had a couple dozen points to give you right now...

    2. Re:Attacked By Endangered Species by RiffRafff · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hate it when that happens.


      (Now, some extra crap to fill space and defeat lame lameness filter) blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

      --
      "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
  14. Next Week... by Davak · · Score: 4, Funny


    Next week we can all read about the follow up stories from the America Plastic Association, the American Balsa Wood Collective, and the Society for the Reuse of Aluminum Foil...

    Davak

    1. Re:Next Week... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      "Society for the Reuse of Aluminum Foil" also known as the AFPB Association of America - "Wear your tinfoil hat with pride!"

    2. Re:Next Week... by Physics+Nobody · · Score: 1

      Ever been to a physics lab? A real one, I mean. There's always aluminum foil everywhere. They have boxes filled with used aluminum foil that they save and reuse since they're too cheap to buy new aluminum foil.

      Makes you think...

      --

      Physics is good

  15. This bike promises to be much more successful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...than the American Cheese Society's offering.

  16. "Sustainable"? by justinburt · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Bicycling more "sustainable"? Haven't the environmentalists been trying to get us all to change to bicycles from cars supposedly because of the pollution that cars generate? And now not even bicycles are "sustainable" because they are "resource intensive"?

    When does it end? Should I just stop using resources altogether (i.e. die?)

    I won't post this anonymously precisely because I mean this quite seriously and not as a troll. Mod me down if you must.

    Justin

    1. Re:"Sustainable"? by babymac · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Should I just stop using resources altogether (i.e. die?)

      Actually I've been convinced for years that this is exactly what radical environmentalists would like. They'd like to see 90% of the earth's population dead and the remaining 10% should behave and think exactly as they do. This means living a completely agrarian lifestyle and automatically believing that all advancing technology is bad and/or evil. How these ninnies ever expect to live beyond the death of our own sun is beyond me. But then again, they probably think that the death of all humanity is ultimately a good thing.

      --
      "War makes me sad." - Me
    2. Re:"Sustainable"? by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

      This is the reason why everything needs to be thought of in moderation. For a country such as China that has such a large percentage of the population using bikes then switching to bamboo makes economic and environmental sense, however in a country such as the USA where the majority of people are driving motor vehicles it's a moot point. Here in the States it would be more effective to have people switch from their SUV's to a bike, even aluminum ones. Down the road then bamboo may become more available, but until then I would be happy to see more bikes and less cars.

    3. Re:"Sustainable"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is always room for improvement.
      Why not drive the evolution of technology by resources that do not hurt so much?

      I do not know whom you consider to be an environmentalist. I do not label myself as such but it makes me nevertheless sad to see how rude this earth is treated.

      It takes millenia for metalls or oil to come into existence, while plant resources grow fast and, if cultivated properly, never cease to provide valuable resources.

      Nearly nobody objects that technology advances (i. e. processors become faster), why shouldn't we advance in direction of suistainable resources too?
      To my opinion we have to do so, if we do not want to end up living miserably in a pile of dirt respectivly want to come out of that dirt.

    4. Re:"Sustainable"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hey, I'd bike a lot more if it were safe. However, the biking community, laws, and road construction in my area combined create a crappy atmosphere. I used to bike everywhere when I was a kid and teenager, but I don't now. Road conditions combined with laws and, well, generally shitty bike riders end up making biking a hell of a lot less safe.

      First, the roads where I live (north of Lancaster, PA) are fairly decent, but not great. Typically good for safe driving. However, they don't put shoulders on the damn things half the time anymore, due to traffic congestion in the area (they widen roads frequently by removing the old roads shoulders and widening a little, usually somebody's front yard). Where there are shoulders, they don't maintain them. Which I find stupid--they pave them anyways, just do a crappy job of it, and if they did a couple more passes to flatten the edges and painted some narrow bike lanes on them, it'd be great.

      The only safe places to ride nowadays are some backroads, and with the growth in the area, that's even out the window as people now use them principally for shortcuts. (They stuff up traffic lights regularly, but they aren't sync'd--at 5pm, it's a stupid sight--you see the main road waiting with cars, while the lesser traveled cross road gets a green for over 1 minute, with no traffic crossing--this isn't a city with blocks but more like farmland gone suburbia, so having lines backed up to the next intersections is absurdly long.)

      Second, bicyle rider politeness has gone downhill, some of it understandably though. Automobile drivers aren't exactly nice. However, I used to ride, and most of the bikers in the area now are clueless. They blow stop signs completely without checking. They double up, riding side by side, blocking traffic lanes. Politely tap your vehicle horn at them, they go ballistic, overreact and you get a middle finger while swerving around some ass that can't control their ride--gee, they have 3 feet to move over, but ride the white line. Where there is a decent shoulder, which is rare, they still ride on the rightmost white line, blocking any hell of a chance of being safely passed, safe being to the driver due to opposing traffic and to them.

      Frequently, they are clueless as to what's going on around them. This also causes irate drivers, given they have to wait, when they could have proceeded if the biker moved over 3 freakin feet. Now, being a po'd driver isn't helping things, but at least there is some rhyme and reason to driving around the area in a car. Not so with a bike.

      Third, the laws in PA suck wrt bicycles. They are considered both pedestrian and vehicle. Generally, in PA, it's the pedestrian who must watch out for vehicles. OTOH, bikes are supposed to follow road signs, which most don't. Add to that the most state law is/was such that it's legal to block traffic lanes with your bike which then makes due consideration and safety a secondary thing to most drivers as they try hard to pass safely by, leading to pissed off, abrasive drivers and riders.

      Add to this that you can't ride on sidewalks, bah. Now, I'm usually opposed to sidewalk riding, except that in residential areas, there are frequently NO ONE on the damn sidewalk (everyone drives), so it's safer there than on the road. Of course, ride on the sidewalk will get you a local ticket.

      I'd ride everyday--I only work 1.6 miles away from where I sleep. Of course, there are no sidewalks, and 3/4s of the road up has no shoulder (one area is so bad, they have no pedestrian signs up). So, I hop in my car, and drive to work. Drive to the post office (.5 miles away from work). To the grocery store (2 .5 miles away from either work or residence).

      Hell, half the places, I'd walk to if they'd put freakin decent sidewalks, crosswalks or traffic light crossing lanes in. But no. I hop in my stupid car and drive, because I'd rather not get run over.

      Stupid municipality.

    5. Re:"Sustainable"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just means that in term of resources needed:
      bamboo bicycle normal bicycle cars

      What is so strange about this?

    6. Re:"Sustainable"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean "bamboo bicycle < normal bicycle < cars"

    7. Re:"Sustainable"? by Suidae · · Score: 2

      Here ya go

    8. Re:"Sustainable"? by cosyne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is "more sustainable" hard to comprehend? What makes you think that just because bicycling is better than driving automatically makes it perfect?

      What you seem to miss is that environmentalists' goals aren't just some arbitrary crap that someone made up to punish you. The idea is to do the least damage to the environment. If you can do less damage by biking, great. If you can do even less than that by using fewer resources in the process, wonderful. Even if "the environmentalists" you refer to are overestimating the problems caused by burning fossil fuels, do you honestly think that driving an Excursion around is helping anything but Ford and Exxon's bottom lines?

    9. Re:"Sustainable"? by gobbo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yes, "radical" -- in the same way that Charles Manson was a radical aesthete. But you're in reality referring to a very few fringe freaks, who get great media coverage because the news is a circus.

      they probably think that the death of all humanity is ultimately a good thing...the word you're searching for is 'misanthropic' and yes some of the kookoo activists are deeply misanthropic, eg. Paul Watson. Misanthropes are as bad as Social Darwinists.

      No being can stop using resources. It's simply a question of ecology. How much do you give back to the life-sustaining biosphere, it's vigor and diversity? Only robo-heads assume that technology must by definition consume increasingly vast amounts of resources. It's our sloppiness, technological youth, and immature economics (eg. GDP benefits from ecological disaster) that keeps us overusing and laying waste. (Sidestepping population debates here.)

      Most environmentalists are all about appropriate technology, and want nothing more than society to act upon some of the basic principles of progress, such as "waste is a costly inefficiency" and "knowledge must complexify". That way we'll begin to understand chaotic systems like ecologies and develop cheaper, higher tech stuff that pollutes WAY less or not at all.

      I think a bamboo bike in mass production would have to be pretty high-tech to succeed. And, like many environmentalists, I look forward to cleverly designed industry, cities, and social conditions--appropriate (sustainable) technology. It's conservative, applies the precautionary principle, but it's not technophobic, its really an argument about what technology and how to deploy it.

    10. Re:"Sustainable"? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      For a country such as China that has such a large percentage of the population using bikes then switching to bamboo makes economic and environmental sense

      No, it's completely insane. Bamboo bikes are a toy, and require careful handcrafting to work at all, let alone be safe. They are also bound to be more expensive than steel-framed bikes, and a safety and quality-control nightmare. Environmentally, China is a disaster in the making as automobile manufacture ramps up. Already in major Chinese cities bikes are being banned from major roads to make way for the almighty polluting car. Of course, massive smog and traffic jams are the result. Not to mention massive oil demands and global warming.

      Here in the States it would be more effective to have people switch from their SUVs to a bike, even aluminum ones.

      Agree with you there.

    11. Re:"Sustainable"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to do no damage to the environment, why not just die? That prevents you from ever doing environmental damage again.

    12. Re:"Sustainable"? by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

      I have a different take.

      Sterilize 90% of the population. Within a few generations, earth population drops to a sustainable number. Maybe 200 million, 500 million?

      These people can then enjoy a really good (Canada or US or EU style) quality of life. And they can do so indefinitely because they aren't overdrafting the environment.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
    13. Re:"Sustainable"? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Should I just stop using resources altogether (i.e. die?)

      Only if you agree to be burried at sea or without a casket.

      Do you know how much polyester and stuff is in a modern casket? And don't get me started on cremation. Just think of the awful ammount of fossil fuels used, not to mention greenhouse gasses that you'll release if you do that.

      No way on this dying thing. You'd better keep living... or else!

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    14. Re:"Sustainable"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Misanthropes are bad"? You must be one of them anthropes.

    15. Re:"Sustainable"? by iendedi · · Score: 1

      No way on this dying thing. You'd better keep living... or else!

      The environmentalist death creed: Upon death, my body should be returned to the biosphere in one or more of the following ways: (1) Feed me to other animals - but do not process me first, (2) Leave me to rot and fertilize the land - just drop me somewhere convenient.

      --

      It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
  17. An explaination for non-bike-geeks by salimfadhley · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am a bike-geek as well as a Lunix-Geek:

    The bike is a single-speed. That means it does not need gears, breaks or even a ratcheted freewheel (on the back wheel)... the pedals are connected directly to the rear wheel by the chain. If you want to slow down you use your legs.

    Single-speeds are favourites of city-couriers, where there is a great advantage to have a light-simple bike. There is less to break (XTR gear systems are known to wear out after a few weeks of couriering).

    As for Aluminum - dont get me started on that nasty harsh material. There has been a disturbing trend for wannabee bikers to adopt the freakiest lightest materials at the expense of all other properties.

    For me, steel still has the edge over all these fancy materials. A steel frame will last for years of hard riding, and still feel as plush as the day it was first ridden.

    1. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by jchristopher · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you mean it's a "fixed gear" not a singlespeed. There are certainly plenty of singlespeed bikes (bikes with one gear) that aren't fixed. In fact, the majority of them are not fixed gears (i.e., you can coast).

    2. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by paanta · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe you're talking about "fixed gear" bikes rather than single-speed bikes. Single-speed means one speed, with or without a freewheel. Fixed gear is a fixed, non-freewheeled single-speed bike. As far as aluminum goes, its no harsher than any other frame material. The amount of flex offered by the frame, compared to the seat and tires is so small that, for a given frame geometry, I doubt many people could tell the difference between steel and aluminum. Steel's big advantage is that you can get it repaired in third world nations, and lugged steel frames look freekin' cool. Even the biggest retro-grouch of them all, Sheldon Brown, doesn't think steel offers significant comfort advantages: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-materials.html

    3. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


      "As for Aluminum - dont get me started on that nasty harsh material. There has been a disturbing trend for wannabee bikers to adopt the freakiest lightest materials at the expense of all other properties."

      Why don't you take this unfounded and unsupportable opinion across to rec.bicycles.tech, where the people who know about bike frame materials live? It would be quite amusing watching you get spanked off the newsgroup.

      T&K.

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    4. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 1

      As a fellow bike-geek (who just rode from SF to Chicago on an aluminum frame), I completely agree.

      The only reason I haven't gone to steel is money -- I bought my bike before I knew what I know now about materials.

      I think this bamboo bike is really neat and really cool. Where I think it could take off is the cheap, replaceable commuter bike market.

      But like aluminum, titanium, and carbon fiber, bamboo seems like it would be a bitch to fix if splintered the material or cracked it somehow, not unlike the problems with cracking and breaking of the above mentioned metals.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    5. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A real bike geek would know non-coaster bikes are called fixed gear, not singles speed. I know, I have two hanging in the living room.

    6. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      As for Aluminum - dont get me started on that nasty harsh material.

      I will try as you really don't do jack to support your claims. I've worked with aluminum for half a decade and prefer it more than steel and stainless steel.

      There has been a disturbing trend for wannabee bikers to adopt the freakiest lightest materials at the expense of all other properties.

      What other properties? Exactly how is aluminum a "freak" material?

      A steel frame will last for years of hard riding, and still feel as plush as the day it was first ridden.

      Plush? Steel?

      With proper design, I am sure that aluminum should last just as long. I really don't see what is so special about a bicycle that would make aluminum a bad material, aluminum is the staple material for aircraft and a lot of airplanes last well into three decades, if you count the B-52 and B-135 designs, five decades.

      I will grant that the initial extraction of aluminum is environmentally costly, but that's not a material property problem.

    7. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xtr wears out after a few weeks? excuse me?

      i've been riding the same xtr rig through mud, snow, rain and clogging dust for many thousands of miles and THREE YEARS now. sorry bud, you're vacating an inappropriate orifice making that statement.

      and you need to learn to spell. there's a difference between "brakes" and "breaks".

    8. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but you're wrong.

    9. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ride a steel (cro-moly actually) bike. I prefer it due to the ride and how I ride.

      But your uninformed diss of aluminum is silly. Aluminum has some properties some bikers really prefer. It's lighter than steel, even with larger tube diameters and thicknesses. It's a weaker metal requiring, typically, bigger tubes (larger diameter tubes mean more strength). Some people like the look of the larger tubes (I myself do, esp. with some of the paint jobs). (You also get some decent paint jobs that a larger tube allows.)

      Most importantly, aluminum is rigid as hell. There is very little flex; riding steel and going to aluminum, this is discernable if you have half a brain. (The more rigid a frame, the better power transfer you get from rider to the pedals.) When I rode my first aluminum bike, it was unreal. It's a clearly different feel to a daily biker.

      I ride steel because I consider it more plush of a frame compared to aluminum. I do light mountain biking. My road bike is also steel; however, if I was buying one today, I'd go aluminum, because I ride short distances on the road (I'd go steel if I were getting, saying, a touring bike.) Steel flexes quite a bit compared to aluminum, but not too plushy like titanium (although, as with steel, there are techniques to minimize flex). Comfort, not efficiency of transferring my pedal power to the wheel, is more important to me (stiffer frame of aluminum generally means better power transfer, although you can get this from steel somewhat with a well constructed frame and varying welding techniques and tube thicknesses).

      btw, if some wannabee biker wanted the lightest materials, they'd go carbon fiber and titanium, not aluminum. Which brings up another decent point of aluminum bikes--if lightness is important and steel not your thing, you can still get a light and strong bike going with aluminum. Titanium and carbon fiber frames are still quite a bit more expensive than comparable aluminum (or steel) frames.

    10. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by r00zky · · Score: 1

      bamboo seems like it would be a bitch to fix if splintered the material or cracked it somehow

      The article says bamboo pieces are glued to the steel joints, just dissolve the glue and replace the piece that is starting to break or broken. That sounds way cheaper than usual.

      The only problem would be finding another bamboo piece of the exact diameter...

      --
      I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
    11. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With proper design, I am sure that aluminum should last just as long.

      And that, my friend, is the biggest problem with buying an aluminum frame. You have to spend in the upper $1000s to get a 'good' aluminum frame that will ride well. The one thing that the cheap AL frames have going for them is that they're light. If you can stand an extra bit of weight in the frame (and most novice to intermediate rider's can) a steal frame would be a much better buy.

      Plush? Steel?

      hmmm... I guess you don't ride much, so all I can say is go ride two bikes, one made of aluminum and the other of steal, both within the same price range and with the same component spec. Chances are you will easily be able to feel the 'Plushness' of the stealie. The plushness that rides speak of is related to the greater ability of steal to return to its original shape after deformation.

      laters,
      D.

      1994 Trek 930 - hardtail, lugged steal frame
      2003 XT Components
      2003 Manitou Mars Comp

    12. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad you couldn't have been a little more explanative with your opinion.

    13. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by JonToycrafter · · Score: 1

      Again, for non-bike geeks - in OUR parlance, "single speed" refers to fixies, at least here in NYC.

      Also for non-bike-geeks - WTF is wrong with you? I went to this today (these photos are from last year).

      So tell me why EVERYONE isn't a bike geek? :)

    14. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      HRm, you're obviously not a bike rider (or a serious one at that).
      Steel absorbs a lot of the bumps you encounter while riding and distributes it through the frame. It's also got a little play in it that gives it a somewhat "plush" ride.
      Aluminum bikes, while light, tend to pass every little bump in the road straight into your spine and rattle you senseless. Some people can tolerate it better than others. Therefore, the ride is considered much harsher than a steel frame.
      I have an aluminum bike frame and ride it everyday and if it weren't for the fact I forked out about a grand for it 10 years ago, I'd grab another steel frame.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    15. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      I doubt a bamboo bike would be cheap, durable or easy to fix. It would also be very expensive as making it takes much labor of a skilled craftsman. Bamboo bikes are more like a decked out and stylin' street rod than an old reliable pickup truck.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

  18. Sustainable? by thelizman · · Score: 1, Troll

    There is no "sustaining" bicycling. You build a bike, and it's done. It's a durable good.

    As for aluminum, it's manufacture costs is due to our limited foundary technology, not because of any peculiar property of aluminum. Also, aluminum is a relatively rare metal when compared to the iron it often stands in for.

    Rather than deforesting vast tracts of already endangered bamboo forests (which is already leading to the demise of the Panda - not that the stupid beast deserves a future in the ecosystem), folks ought to consider carbon fiber for the bicycles.

    1. Re:Sustainable? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1
      Rather than deforesting vast tracts of already endangered bamboo forests...
      Deforestation in general is killing pandas, but bamboo is easily replanted, i remember reading somewhere that it can grow a foot in a 24 hour period. This seems to be a much more viable option than any metal, or even carbon fiber, which i'm sure is expensive(costwise and energywise) to manufacture.
      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Sustainable? by thebigmacd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is, unlike trees bamboo reaches usable size in three years, and no need to replant after harvesting. Rather than deforest you can simply plant your own. And if they deforest correctly there is a new forest within three years. In the process of producing carbon fibre don't doubt there is a crazy amount of pollution and environmental destruction. Just think of the chemicals in the resin, and the use of sulphuric acid and petrochemicals in the fibre production process. All in all, the point is that I couldn't grow carbon fibre in my back yard no matter where I lived on this earth. Did it ever occur to you that in underprivilidged societies a bamboo bike may be a whole lot cheaper than carbon fibre?

    3. Re:Sustainable? by macmark · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt we have to worry about the production of bamboo bicycles endangering the bamboo forests. As a matter of fact, my mother in law in South Korea would probably like it if someone could regularly harvest the bamboo that keeps overgrowing her rice paddies and crop fields.

    4. Re:Sustainable? by FredThompson · · Score: 1

      Huh? How is a steel tube "plush"?

    5. Re:Sustainable? by Crimson+Midget · · Score: 1

      not that the stupid beast deserves a future in the ecosystem

      after watching a t.v. special about pandas and the difficulties they're having, I couldn't help but think of the screamapillar.

      "Without constant reassurance, it will die. It's sexually attracted to fire."

      Are you sure God doesn't want it dead?

    6. Re:Sustainable? by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      The people next door to me had a bunch of bamboo growing along the road in front of their house. They didn't like it, for whatever reason, and cut it all down, dumping it all on their grass clippings pile. Within a week, the stuff by the road was back to its old height of about 5 feet, and there was a forest of taller stuff growing around the clippings pile.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    7. Re:Sustainable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aluminum ores are /way/ more abundant than iron ores.

      the only reason you perceive steel as being more abundant is because more is produced. and more is produced because it can be chemically extracted with the aid of other cheap abundant materials with relative ease. it also has superior mechanical properties for a lot of uses.

      carbon fiber is /not/ very eco-friendly. the resins into which the fibers are embedded are really nasty persistant organic chemicals whose precursors are really noxious stuff.

  19. Mountain biking by failedlogic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do a lot of mountain biking. I know there's some engineers who read /.

    There are suspension forks which can be purchased for mountain bikes and some offer read suspension.

    Assuming, the metal suspension fork is kept and a decent diameter bamboo tubing is used - would the bamboo have sufficient strength, durability and shock absorbing qualities to make a good mountain bike?

    One way or another it would be interesting to try, that's for sure.

    1. Re:Mountain biking by salimfadhley · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you could make a decent mountain bike, however the problem will come at the joins. Accordign to that photo, the frame is made of lugs that have been glued to bamboo poles. Carbon fibre frames are made in a similar way. The challenge is to find an adhesive that is able to bond nicely to metal and bamboo. The other problem with bamboo is that you cannot guarantee it's regularity in the same way that you can with an artificial tube... I guess that is where craftsmen come in. Not all bamboo tubes are created equal. A lugged frame is normally made by braising metal lugs to metal poles with a bit of solder. Lugged frames are known for being tough but really heavy.

    2. Re:Mountain biking by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      And how much would a bamboo mountain bike of similar strength and durability weigh compared to an aluminium one (ie: could it be a mountain bike or more of an "employ team of Sherpas to help carry the bike" bike?)

    3. Re:Mountain biking by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not an engineer, but the kind of force applied when you push down on one pedal and pull on the corresponding handlebar seems like you'd be attempting to twist and bend the bamboo poles. The bamboo is only stronger than steel when you're pushing on each end.

      You'd eventually wear out your bike like that. Much faster than any commonly used bike material, I'm sure.

      I'd be concerned about the glue being too brittle to deal with serious vibrations, too, but they might be able to come up with the right kind, I'm sure.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:Mountain biking by big+tex · · Score: 1

      First, I am a structural engineer.

      I'm thinking of bamboo as tubular wood. One of the problems with wood which would be even worse with tubular shapes of wood is torsional resistance. Now, I'm going to get a whole bunch of other engineers going "what? tubes have low torsional resistance? Has this guy been eating paint chips/"

      You'd have a problem with the fibres seperating from each other as you twist it.

      Now, I really can't think of any other bamboo uses that induce torsion, expecially since you usually don't bolt through it (because of splintering).

      heavy pedaling will produce torsion in the frame - you are 'racking' the triangle.

      So, yes, this is not so good for a mountain bike.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    5. Re:Mountain biking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are suspension forks which can be purchased for mountain bikes and some offer read suspension.

      Hmm, I'm wondering if anyone offers write suspension, which would be more valuable for me.

    6. Re:Mountain biking by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      Being a Mechanical Engineering student and a mountain biker, I serioususly doubt that bamboo would make a good mountain bike. From my limited experience, bamboo tends to splinter and split longitudinally when it's bent enough.

      Just think of the force you apply to the handlebars when you turn hard, and imagine what would happen to the frame if a stick got lodged in the spokes. Think of how hard you need to hit the brakes when going downhill, and how strong the forks must be to handle the bike being dropped off a 15-foot drop right on the front wheel and being able to ride away. What about trying to ride over logs when you mess up and slam the sprocket into the log; that puts a HUGE strain on the pedals and frame. Also, you would need to mount a derailer somewhere or else have a real hard time going off-road, up and down all the hills that come with the sport.

      As for shock absorbing qualities, I think that the bamboo would give a rather smooth ride, even more so if someone could make a floating swing-arm for the back wheel.

      No, the bamboo bike is destined to stay on the roads and out of the woods unless someone finds a way to significantly increase bamboo's strength - maybe an epoxy resin covering the entire thing, or fiberglass. But that defeats the entire purpose, doesn't it?

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  20. It must be fast....... by omar.sahal · · Score: 2, Funny

    so I can escape any rogue pandas.

  21. How is it sustainable? by dublisk · · Score: 1

    This is a strong step towards making bicycling more sustainable

    I don't think this is more sustainable if we can only develop such a bike now, even though the Chinese have been using Bamboo for thousands of years.

  22. hemp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why not just make the bikes out of hemp instead?

    1. Re:hemp by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      Because then the biker would smoke the bike rather than ride it.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    2. Re:hemp by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Why would you smoke hemp?

    3. Re:hemp by ColaMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Have you ever watched cheech and chong?
      Review of "Up in Smoke" (1978):

      Up in Smoke is Cheech & Chong's first drugged-out shot at making a movie and boy, is it fun. The plot is loosely held together in between comedy sketches, drug busts, the continual search for a little green bag and a rather amusing Tom Skerrit as a whacked out Vietnam vet. Pedro (Cheech) and Man Stoner (Chong) meet on the Pacific Coast Highway as Chong tries to hitch a ride. They smoke a lot of dope, get arrested, look for some more weed and eventually get deported. Their adventure takes them to Mexico and they are soon hired to smuggle, what they think is illegally upholstered furniture, into the U.S. The "illegally upholstered furniture" actually turns out to be a van made out of $9 billion dollars worth of pot. Of course, their van catches fire and the highjinks ensue. The "science" behind how you can make a van, or anything else for that matter, out of marijuana is one of the funniest scenes in the flick.

      Up in Smoke was directed and produced by Lou Adler and written by Cheech & Chong. This is highly entertaining and very funny premium grade stuff and should be right up there on your list of favorite guilty pleasures.
      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    4. Re:hemp by waferbuster · · Score: 1
      I suppose all the points where the hemp pieces intersect would be the frame joints, eh?

      Get it? Joints?

      Aww, nevermind...

      --
      I'm an individual! Just like everyone else!
  23. Fiberglass by zymano · · Score: 0

    Hell, alot most experimental homebuilts are made from it. Cheap.

  24. problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone with a saw can steal a chained bamboo bike.

    1. Re:problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but who wants two halves of a bike ?

  25. Bamboo bike == incredibly old news by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


    It's been done before, many many years ago. see Bicycling Science

    Move along there, nothing to see.

    T&K

    --
    Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
  26. Just great, another trust fund hippy toy. by Kenja · · Score: 1

    Expect to see this in the sharper bric-a-brac for around three grand.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  27. Wow, I want one! by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if this would me more or less expensive than a traditional bicycle? I usually try not to pay more than $200 (CDN) for a bike, because they always get stolen (even if they're locked up... those bastards).

    Since bamboo is so plentiful, I hope this would be uber-cheap. It would be great if I could ride around on a $15 bicycle... I wouldn't really care if it got stolen, but then again, nobody would really want to steal it if they knew how cheap it was... :)

    1. Re:Wow, I want one! by hobbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since you mention CDN, I assume you are in Canada, like myself. My question when I see this is will it stand up to the weather? He's using laminated bamboo. I have an old cromag/alu bike (over 10 years old now). Aside from the occasional greasing of the chain and other moving parts, the bike requires no thought to maintain, and it's had a lot of mud caked on it.

      Will I have to care for a laminated bamboo bike by oiling it or reweatherproofing it in some way? Will I have to carefully clean and dry it after riding on rainy days?

    2. Re:Wow, I want one! by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      As described in the article, these bikes are custom handcrafted jobs--works of art, not mass-produced articles. Though no price is mentioned, you know what they say. "If you have to ask, you can't afford it...."

      From the article,

      "Building these bicycles is art. It is not something you just do. Every bamboo must be selected and fitted into the frame according to size and quality. The secret lies in treating and handling the material the right way. Learning that takes times and the maintenance takes time as well."

      Since all of the pieces are held together with glued, fitted joints--not screws, nails, or spikes--there's a lot of potentially finicky (hence time-consuming and expensive) work involved.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:Wow, I want one! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      It would be great if I could ride around on a $15 bicycle.

      Since that's about what a bike chain costs, or a seat, and much less than a wheel, I doubt it. Unless you wan to go back to the 19th C Penny-farthings with pedals directly on the hub of the 6ft diam front wheel, which could be made of wood.

  28. Fire by RaZ0r · · Score: 1

    Finally! A bike that you can vandalize by setting it on fire! And you don't even need any fuel to start it! Burn baby, burn!

    --


    - Think for yourself, question authority.-
  29. Bamboo is cool by aaron.rowe · · Score: 5, Informative
    I spent some time working in Nigeria and watched the local people erecting 4+ storey buildings using bamboo as scaffolding and for supporting newly laid concrete floors.

    My Structural engineer friend told me that Bamboo is better than steel if used properly and since it just grows like grass it's basically free.

    A bamboo bycicle would be neat but, as a natural product you aren't going to get uniform material to work with so every bike would probably be completeley different to an other. You wouldn't be able to mass produce these things.

    Doing a little googling I found this report about using bamboo instead of steel in reinforced concrete.

    any way that's my bit out of the way.

    A

    1. Re:Bamboo is cool by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I recently saw something about that on TV (Discovery, History Channel,TechTV?). But they said they're finding it harder and harder to get the same quality of bamboo. Apparently the structural qualities of today's bamboo (at least in...Hong Kong? I think that's where the footage was from) are somewhat lacking.

      --
      "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    2. Re:Bamboo is cool by macbot3000 · · Score: 1

      Were they also using bamboo computers and fax machines to send out scam letters?

  30. Bamboo and Hemp by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    now that would a vvvveeeerrrryyyy pppoooopppuuulllaaarrr combination, if you build it from bamboo and tie it together with hemp...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  31. I Bet Steel is Still the Better Choice by Schlemphfer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the summary:

    This is a strong step towards making bicycling more sustainable, expecially in contrast to aluminum, one of the most resource demanding materials that exist.

    It's a cool looking bike, but there's a few things worth mentioning. First of all, compared to driving cars, any form of bicycle is the most sustainable mechanized transport imaginable. I think if we have to worry about the fifteen pounds of metal used for each bicycle, then we might as well give up all hope that humans can survive on the planet. Because if things are that bad, the millions of people buying SUV's are going to put us over the edge in no time, no matter what material we fashion bicycles out of.

    Secondly, the summary says that aluminum is "one of the most resource demanding materials that exist."

    That statement strikes me as terribly disingenuous, if it's not also mentioned that recycled aluminum does away with about 95% of the energies needed to extract aluminum from ore. And besides, how many bicycles are actually made from aluminum or fancy alloys/composites? No bicycle I've ever ridden, I know that much. And certainly not the bikes that are going to be produced for developing countries.

    The real question here is how much extra work goes into fabricating a bamboo bike, vs. mass producing a steel-framed bike that's totally useful to anyone who's not a racing enthusiast. Because I would bet that making bamboo bikes in quantity would take fivefold or even tenfold the labor of stamping out cheap steel-framed bikes. And if that's the case, bamboo bikes could never be within reach of the poor.

    Given how eco-friendly a steel-framed bike is, it's probably counterproductive to devote attention to an alternative that would probably be fundamentally unsuited to mass production.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:I Bet Steel is Still the Better Choice by smoondog · · Score: 1

      And besides, how many bicycles are actually made from aluminum or fancy alloys/composites?

      I'm not sure if I understand your statement, but as written, the answer is lots! Aluminum frames are common in the US and Europe and chrome/steel alloys are even more common. I would bet that most bikes are made of fancy steel alloys and aluminum places second, with still a large number of bikes produced.

      -Sean

    2. Re:I Bet Steel is Still the Better Choice by FatBobSmith · · Score: 0

      If a kit with instructions were straightforward enough, people in poorer countries with moderate climates could grow their own bikes, or pick up the bamboo from a local market or farmer. It looks like most the metal parts are standard or slightly modified bicycle parts that should be fairly easy to stumble across. Rather than buy a marked up bike from a middle man, someone could craft a decent alternative for very little. I don't know think mass-production would be this bikes best route to market.

    3. Re:I Bet Steel is Still the Better Choice by ithicine · · Score: 1

      Given how eco-friendly a steel-framed bike is, it's probably counterproductive to devote attention to an alternative that would probably be fundamentally unsuited to mass production. Perhaps the modern mindset focusing on cheap, automated labour processes isn't the best suited for third world countries? Not only are third world countries generally lacking in affordable and effective public transport systems, they're high in unemployment. Even if a bamboo bike offers no functional advantage over steel bikes, the very fact that it is innefficient to produce (according to our industrialized standards) may actually be a boon for third world production. It is low tech, requires very little existing infrastructure, and has the added benefit that it needs a great deal of manual labour and care to build. As far as I can tell, mass producing these bicycles would open up a very large number of regularly paid, unskilled jobs, in addition to a number of trained jobs. Splitting the design process into bamboo harvest, selection, sorting, cutting to size/shape and whatever other processes are needed, then reselection and finally the master craft of assembly opens up an alternative to industrial mass production that relies instead on untapped human resources. Perhaps it's this sort of "back to the basics" production plan that is better suited to improving the economic infrastructure neccessary to improve the standard of living in 3rd world countries? Maybe this is the real reason a bamboo bike makes sense? I'm not an economist, obviously, so correct me if I'm wrong. BTW... FIRST POST!

    4. Re:I Bet Steel is Still the Better Choice by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      the very fact that it is inefficient to produce (according to our industrialized standards) may actually be a boon for third world production

      No, it's just a road to more poverty. The 3rd world doesn't need less efficient production, but more. Less efficient production means either lower wages (i.e. lower than in the existing factories, which are on the poverty line already) or higher prices (which means that they must put massive import duties on imported bikes, or sell none at all). It also means no export market, except for a few sold as toys to rich foreigners, a market that will evaporate quickly after a few get serious injuries from the frames failing and spearing their intestines with bamboo splinters.

    5. Re:I Bet Steel is Still the Better Choice by ithicine · · Score: 1

      Less efficient production means either lower wages (i.e. lower than in the existing factories, which are on the poverty line already)

      Though I agree with the idea that making more, cheaper, would be an excellent solution, this isn't always a practical solution to implement. More often than not, more efficient means fewer humans involved in production. This is great when factories can just keep cropping up thanks to the availability of capital to employ the workforce, but to my knowledge the human resources tend to outstrip factory employment opportunities in third world countries.

      The idea is that there may be an advantage in that these bicycles aren't practical for factory production. The design works best when made by hand; if many should be built, this would require a large number of hands working on many bicycles all at once. Considering the extremely large number of people with absolutely NO income, at least it offers the opportunity to put food on the table, or pay for medicine, or what have you.

      Less efficient production means either lower wages (i.e. lower than in the existing factories, which are on the poverty line already) or higher prices

      Yes, workers building these bicycles for production would either be producing at incredibly low wages, or would be producing a madly expensive product. But if you can make the small, yet critical leap from essentially scavenging for food and clean water to being able to afford at least a shot at a healthier life, then that's an improvement. It won't put them over the poverty line, but it will distance these people struggling to eke out an existance from disease and death. These people are at a point where any little bit counts.

      Again, I see evidence of the modern concept of economics being put into play where perhaps a "blast to the past" might work better. I'm not talking about yanking countries into the 21st century in one giant leap, but slowly building more of a barebones economy sufficient to improve quality of life to some degree, in the regions that most need it. Perhaps approaching production by aligning a large number of people on a single task could transform extremely poor, isolated communities into just really, really poor communities.

      Furthermore, it costs virtually nothing to get a group of people started at this, other than time learning how to make bamboo bicycles. Opening a factory costs money that the vast majority of people and even groups can't afford. If people are willing to work at shockingly low rates for the shot at gaining a little control over their destinies, then that's an improvement. As for the actual safety of the bikes, that's obviously something to take into account when considering whether the market can work at all or not. However, so far there isn't any real data to tell you that these are particularly unreliable. Forgive my ignorance, but doesn't bamboo have a tiny bit more give to it than metal, thus allowing it to withstand shock a little better? I seem to remember something about bamboo structures withstanding earthquakes remarkably well.

    6. Re:I Bet Steel is Still the Better Choice by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The idea is that there may be an advantage in that these bicycles aren't practical for factory production. The design works best when made by hand; if many should be built, this would require a large number of hands working on many bicycles all at once.

      A "steel bike" factory would be of a similar technical standard. I saw some tiny bike factories in Taiwan. Juayt a shed wher they were welding steel tubes together then painting and assembling the bikes. But in both cases they have to have the capital to buy all the components (which is most of them) that you can't make out of bamboo or make at all in a village. forgive my ignorance, but doesn't bamboo have a tiny bit more give to it than metal, thus allowing it to withstand shock a little better? I seem to remember something about bamboo structures withstanding earthquakes remarkably well.

      Steel (and othe metal) bikes have a carefully designed amount of springiness for a comfrtable ride. You could make steel as springy as you liked; but then it'd be too wobbly to ride. If you flex a piece of bamboo often enough, it starts to get soggy, then falls apart. Steel framed buildings survive earthquakes too; it's just the brittle bricks and concrete attached to the frames that fall off that make the problem.

    7. Re:I Bet Steel is Still the Better Choice by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      it's probably counterproductive to devote attention to an alternative that would probably be fundamentally unsuited to mass production.

      That depends if mass production is labor saving, and I'd think it is.

      Many developing countries have excess available labor (high unemployment), so it doesn't necessarily need labor saving techniques, and of course, the energy needed to make steel parts isn't always plentiful in such areas.

      I do think the original article is somewhat disingenuous for the reasons you state, it looks more like a PR tool or a "look what I made" brag.

  32. Fixie! by YeOldeGnurd · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's called a "fixed gear bike". There's no freewheel in the rear hub, so you have to pedal all the time you are moving, and you stop by stopping pedalling.

    This may seem like a pain, but fixies are actually extremely popular among a certain bike subculture, particularly urban bike messengers. The famous and wonderful Sheldon Brown has an extensive collection of articles on building and riding fixies.

    --
    ...Nothing interesting here. Just move along...
    1. Re:Fixie! by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 1

      I love fixies -- I'm in the process of building myself one. But, would a bamboo fixie cause more strain in the wrong directions? I rode a fixed gear once with a homemade rear hub built out of a standard hub with a free wheel and all and the rear gear was always breaking loose and eventually the hub broke down because backpedaling is a very straining activity.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    2. Re:Fixie! by paanta · · Score: 1

      Lock rings and locktite will fix that.

    3. Re:Fixie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keith Bontrager once said: "It is better to triumph by the power of your legs than by the artifice of a derailer."

    4. Re:Fixie! by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 1

      But I'm talking about the stress on the frame from backpedaling.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    5. Re:Fixie! by Bigboote66 · · Score: 1

      Fixies still need brakes. It's probably not a Fixie, but a bike with hub brakes.

    6. Re:Fixie! by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      In many states, you still need to put a working handbrake on a fixie to make it street legal. Oregon is one of those states. You're not required to use it, but have it there just in case.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    7. Re:Fixie! by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

      And, for those folks who think it's reasonable not to put a front brake on a fixed gear bike, well, they generally either go too slow or don't know enough about the physics of cycling. Sheldon put it better than I can:

      Some fixed-gear riders ride on the road without brakes. This is a bad idea. I know, I've tried it. If you do it, and have any sense of self-preservation at all, it will cause you to go much slower than you otherwise could, everytime you go through an intersection, or pass a driveway. The need for constant extra vigilance takes a great deal of the fun out of cycling.

      You really should have a front brake. A front brake, all by itself, will stop a bicycle as fast as it is possible to stop. This is true because when you are applying the front brake to the maximum, there is no weight on the rear wheel, so it has no traction.

      One of the wonderful things about fixed-gear riding is that the direct feel you get for rear-wheel traction teaches you exactly how hard you can apply the front brake without quite lifting the wheel off of the ground.

      This is a very valuable lesson for any cyclist who likes to go fast; it could save your life.

      There is really no need for a rear brake on a fixed-gear bicycle. By applying back-pressure on the pedals, you can supply all the braking that the rear wheel really needs. In fact, it is fairly easy to lock up the rear wheel and make it skid, unless you are running a rather high gear.

      Some fixed-gear fans make a point of not using their brake except in an emergency. I am not sure that this is a good idea. Heavy duty resisting is widely reputed to be bad for your legs, and to be counterproductive for building up muscles and coordination for forward pedaling.

      This is a lot like car drivers who use their transmission and clutch to slow down, even though the car has a special set of parts made for the exact purpose of slowing down. Brake shoes are cheaper to replace when they wear out than clutches are.

    8. Re:Fixie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the rear hub is 1-2 inches thick it's probably got brakes.
      Only fixies I ever saw had standard tiny rear axles..

  33. The only problem... by BradNelson · · Score: 1

    The only problem with this...is who would want to ride something so darn ugly? I mean, this looks like the kind of bike vagrants would pass over. Maybe it's just me.

  34. does bicycle production use THAT much? by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 1

    'This is a strong step towards making bicycling more sustainable, expecially in contrast to aluminum, one of the most resource demanding materials that exist.'

    Do bikes really use so much aluminum that it has a noticable effect on the aluminum market? There are many, many things that use aluminum, and I have never heard of the industry having troubles being "sustainable."

    1. Re:does bicycle production use THAT much? by cjsnell · · Score: 1

      [having spent the last 28 years of my life hanging around my family's bike stores, this article has me all rawled up]

      Simple Answer: No. Hell no. In fact, most consumer bikes are made of steel alloy. Aluminum bikes are generally more expensive, starting at around $500-600 last time I checked. People who want a "practical, eco-friendly" bike would not spend that much in the first place. Most people who want a lightweight bike could really care less about what the 5 pounds of aluminum in their bike frame does to the environment. If they were concerned and they wanted a nice, lightweight bike, they would buy one with a carbon fiber frame.

      I just can't see a bamboo bike improving on anything. If you want to talk about providing cheap, sustainable bikes for the masses, that's already happening. You can get a robot-welded bike made from (recycled) steel in some parts of the world for $100 or less (probably less). I seriously doubt bamboo is going to undercut cheap steel in the bike industry, simply because the uniformity of the steel tubing makes it simple for machines to do the assembly/welding.

      Chris

    2. Re:does bicycle production use THAT much? by arodland · · Score: 1

      Um.

      Look up the ecogeek definition of the word "sustainable". It's not anything like any human meaning. :)

      Then reconsider your post.

  35. sustainable biking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're kidding, right? .. alkjsdfl;kajsfd;lja
    alksjflkajsdf

    fucking slashdot

  36. All about context by bpm140 · · Score: 1

    "Building these bicycles is art. It is not something you just do. Every bamboo must be selected and fitted into the frame according to size and quality. The secret lies in treating and handling the material the right way. Learning that takes times and the maintenance takes time as well."

    Yes, refining aluminum belches lots of nasty stuff into the sky. But at least you get lots of bikes quickly thanks to interchangable parts. How many resources (food, water, electricity, etc) are required to sustain the people building one bamboo bicyle a day?

    I'd rather have a million people riding aluminum bikes and zero SUVs than 10,000 people riding bamboo bikes and 990,000 SUVs.

  37. environment? quantity? economy? by evilWurst · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I question whether this is an environmental good thing. Using bamboo in stuff means *importing* bamboo - because if you try growing it anywhere other than where it's supposed to be, you can destroy your own local ecology. So it has to be imported, and you're economically tied to the few countries that can grow it in quantity and to the right quality. Steel and aluminum, on the other hand, are easy to get locally, and can be shaped in ways bamboo cannot. Plastics and carbon fiber can also be made locally, and carbon nanostuff will eventually also be available locally. And all of these other materials can be recycled, whereas bamboo can only be burned or mulched.

    You also can't mass produce bamboo products - as it says towards the bottom of the article, the guy that makes these needs to hand-select everything for quality. Remember, you can cut the length of these, but not the diameter - you're stuck with whatever diameter it grew to - so precision is extremely difficult.

    1. Re:environment? quantity? economy? by doinky · · Score: 1

      Uh, bamboo is a nuisance plant in many places around the world, including this country. It's certainly a good thing when you can generate some economic activity out of what, now, is a waste.

  38. Um. by AntiOrganic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I don't see any brakes on that thing.

    1. Re:Um. by AntiOrganic · · Score: 0, Redundant

      God damn it, someone beat me to that comment, with the same fucking subject line too. ::smashes face::

  39. It wil make you fat by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    Tried that Hemp bindings caught fire.. fumes made me eat
    3 bags of Oreos
    2 peanut butter and banana sandwitches
    and
    consume 2 gal of rippl double fudge ice cream

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    1. Re:It wil make you fat by dev_sda · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah, smoking hemp twine will get you high, just like masturbating will make you go blind.

  40. Hmmm by panxerox · · Score: 1

    Damn, a pile of punji sticks on wheels.... a crash would be horrific.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  41. Bamboo bikes have existed for over 100 years by kfg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Particularly in the orient, but in other places as well when times were either hard or when metals were subject to civilian restriction, such as during WWII. Wooden bikes have also been used at times.

    They don't work very well. Bamboo is strong, but it's also very flexible. This is also the reason that molded plastic bikes ( as opposed to fiber reineforced plastic bikes) have never worked. If a plastic is ridid enough to make a good bike frame it's also to brittle.

    Aluminum is energy intensive to originally produce, but the cheapest and easiest metal to recycle. It also doesn't rust away to unusable oxide, making aluminum the most green of the metals in the long run.

    In any case you'll still find most bikes made of steel, because iron is common, easy to smelt, easy to turn into high quality steel, easy to recycle, cheap, and, while not necessarily the highest performing material for a bike frame in any particular measurment, it is, nonetheless, in the top 90 percentile in every attribute needed to make a good bike frame.

    What's more, you need very little steel to make a bike whose usable lifespan may be measured in decades. I have two ridable children's trikes over 100 years old.

    There's simply nothing about bamboo bikes that make them more sustainable than a steel bike, and they're nowhere near as good.

    KFG

    1. Re:Bamboo bikes have existed for over 100 years by Eric+Destiny · · Score: 0

      You still ride tricycles? Time to upgrade to a two-wheeler.

      --

      "The meek shall inherit the earth, the rest of us shall go to the stars." Isaac Asimov

    2. Re:Bamboo bikes have existed for over 100 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got to rest my nuts somewhere and a two-wheeler is just too narrow. The problem is that my balls hang down the sides of the bike and I keep hitting my balls while pedalling. Any suggestions?

    3. Re:Bamboo bikes have existed for over 100 years by Suchetha · · Score: 1

      IIRC a group of US aviation engineers in china built a working airplane out of bamboo and casein (a milk protein based glue) during world war two. i googled all over but couldn't find any more information on it.

      Suchetha

      --

      learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
      or one out of three ain't bad
  42. Crash hard enough by poity · · Score: 1

    and you too can have spears of splintered bamboo go through your torso.

    Weeeeee!

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  43. long term by spamchang · · Score: 1

    Eventually, it'll become easier to produce bamboo bikes, and this technology could be implemented in Asia, for instance, where there is a huge need for easier transportation. Not saying bamboo bikes are more durable than any other material under any stress, but no one's going to bike up an unpaved mountainside in a bamboo bike. Maybe 10-30 city blocks, which it ought to be suited just fine for. Heck, I'd get one to use around campus. Might get the attention of the crazy eco-freak girls around here =P. And I doubt anyone would want to steal a bamboo bike anyway.

  44. Linux by josh+crawley · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Has anyone succeeded in getting Linux to run on one of these?

  45. what the crap? by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 1

    Aluminum is one of the most resource intensive materials on Earth? And I thought printer ink was bad. In any case, judging by the amount of Mountain Dew I drink, I should be able to fashion about 20 bikes a year. I don't see any bamboo growing up here in the frozen tundra of Minnesota. The choice for me is obvious.

    1. Re:what the crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he is referring to the often quoted statistic about the amount of energy needed to produce aluminum from raw ore that environmentalists constantly use to show us how bad having anything other than an agrarian culture is.

    2. Re:what the crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When reading the above post, please consider the following correction:

      s/.$/ bad./g

  46. extraordinarily plentiful by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 2, Funny
    bamboo is much more environmentally friendly than metals while being extraordinarily plentiful

    This sounds great to me, but man I hope that bamboo doesn't work its way into my garden. Has anybody here ever tried to weed bamboo out of a garden?

    My mom planted bamboo once, and then, a few years later in the course of reorganizing her garden, asked me to dig it out. Ugh! That stuff is worse than an Outlook virus! It sends out needle sharpd shooters in all directions. If you see a single stalk poking out of the ground, it might have sent out shooters ten feet all around it. The only way I was able to finally dig it all out was to wait until after a heavy rain and basically just turn the "garden" into a mud soup pulling it out.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  47. Wow, I'd love to try one of those! by reiggin · · Score: 1
    Amazing invention!

    Can't wait to try one!

    Oh. Wait. I guess this involves going outside, doesn't it? Dammit!!!

    And it's considered exercise?! SOB! Does that taunting never end?!?!

  48. Turns heads in Christiania by 123123123 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It turns heads in Christiania because it is the only bike that doubles as a hash pipe.

  49. The Highroad to Environmental Destruction by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    While it's nice and kinda classy, we all know this sort of production is only OK because it's not being mass produced. If this ever became popular, I wonder how long it would be before you heard the tree nazies coming out of the woodwork complaining about bamboo depletion and such. After all, how many bicycicals does a place like China have? After all, bamboo produces more oxygen than it's pulp counterparts, making it far more valuble, etc etc etc...

    Beware Mr. Deslandes... The Tree Nazies cometh.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:The Highroad to Environmental Destruction by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      You cut the bamboo, and within three years it has grown to full length again. The whole time producing oxygen AND bikes.

    2. Re:The Highroad to Environmental Destruction by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      While that's true, I doubt it'll matter to certain parties too much.

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    3. Re:The Highroad to Environmental Destruction by vkapadia · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is not a tree. It is a type of grass.

    4. Re:The Highroad to Environmental Destruction by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      And when did I say it was a tree?

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    5. Re:The Highroad to Environmental Destruction by Quothz · · Score: 1

      After all, bamboo produces more oxygen than it's pulp counterparts, making it far more valuble, etc etc etc...

      I saw this statement in the article, too, and frankly it sounds fishy. I'm no biologist, but it seems to me that wood pulp usually comes from trees, which also have leaves, which produce quite a bit of oxygen.

      I'm given to understand that algae is our big concern in terms of oxygen production, though. I've been told that the oceans produce most of the oxygen floating around. Trees are more important in preventing erosion, building topsoil through defoliation, and providing habitats for critters. Israel has shown that desert can be reclaimed through forestation. Bamboo does some of this, but it shouldn't be thought of as a "tree alternative" in terms of the ecosphere. It doesn't work like that, folks.

      It might have merits as a material in its own right. I like the idea of using bamboo for making stuff. It sounds like it's cheap and easy to produce, is pretty strong, and very lightweight. I think it's cool that someone's taking a shot at it. Although the arguments here have convinced me that bicycles probably aren't the killer bamboo app, it's heartening to see someone trying, and I hope I see more of this kind of thing in the future.

    6. Re:The Highroad to Environmental Destruction by Quothz · · Score: 1

      And when did I say it was a tree?

      Did you have some other "pulp counterpart" in mind? I assumed you were referring to this statement in the article:

      While growing it emits more oxygen that the equivalent amount of wood pulp.

      When you said:

      After all, bamboo produces more oxygen than it's pulp counterparts, making it far more valuble, etc etc etc...

      I was merely pointing out that bamboo is _not_ more valuable than trees, but may be valuable as a material in its own right.

    7. Re:The Highroad to Environmental Destruction by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      "how long it would be before you heard the tree nazies coming out of the woodwork complaining about bamboo depletion"

      Well, if you're wondering how long until the "tree nazies" come out of the woodwork, then one would have to surmise from your wording that you think Bamboo is a tree. ;)

  50. Heh by smoondog · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. I'm looking forward to getting impaled by a broken bamboo shard after falling in a minor collision (or sitting on a slightly weakened stem/seat post). But seriously, I would think this would be difficult to produce in any quantity because bamboo varies in size, unlike metal components. Other than that, I think this would be a cool LA Venice Beach thing....

    -Sean

  51. Bamboo clock? by rigolo · · Score: 1

    Is the poster using a bamboo clock? This artical is from the Whole Earth Winter 2001 Issue ("http://www.wholeearthmag.com/ArticleBin/444.html ) Rigolo

  52. You know what they say... by core+plexus · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    "If it can't be grown, it has to be mined"

    As a miner, I think I'll stick with my metal bike for now. Unfortunately, since I mine for gold and platinum-group metals here in Alaska, and a little gemstones and other interesting minerals, I'm holding out for a gem-encrusted strategic-and-critical minerals bike.

    Plus I grow weary of this save the earth crap.

    "If there's no time for fun, then what are we saving the planet for?"

    1. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the bastards, once we destroy this planet we can always just move over to the other earth. Oh wait...

  53. Guess what? Bamboo IS carbon fiber. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fancy carbon fiber you're talking about is made from heated cotton or other vegetable fiber held in a matrix with toxic resins.

  54. If you want to buy one... by TageSabo · · Score: 1

    Christiania's Bicycle Shop
    Don't know if they will accept mail order, though.

  55. ecological impact of aluminum bikes? by Submarine · · Score: 1

    A bike is very light and uses very little metal compared to a car, with comparable life times. I doubt very much that bike production is of sizeable ecological impact compared to other productions. :-)

  56. Make it out of... by mcd7756 · · Score: 5, Funny
    sugar cane!!

    Sweet!

    --
    Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them? --Abraham Lincoln
  57. Gilligan's Island by heli0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They had a bamboo bicycle that powered the washing machine.

    Did anyone see the episode where the professor made a bamboo car? Why he didn't just make a bamboo boat is beyond me.

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  58. Pandas aren't bears. by Kludge · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're believed to be related to racoons. Take a look at the lesser panda.

  59. I WILL OFFER A PRIZE OF $10,000,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to anyone who can succeed in running Linux on an unmodified bamboo bicycle. Oh, and they have to turn me straight, too. I am James Mulu, son of the late Nigerian finance minister.

  60. yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will the next model have a cupholder?

  61. Steel is Real! by salimfadhley · · Score: 1

    A bike is no good unless it is comfortable and rideable... also it serves no practical value unless it can stand up to the rigour and pollution of city (or country for that matter) life. Of all the materials I have tried (Alu, Carbon, Steel, Titanium) - Steel is still the best all-rounder and my personal favourite. Steel makes for a plusher ride. Steel frames can withstand bumps and scratches without loosing their strength (much). If you want a bike that feels good, lasts longer and does not weigh much more than an alu bike, go for a high-quality steel frame.

    1. Re:Steel is Real! by randyest · · Score: 1
      You're the second poster who has used the adjective plush to describe the feel of a steel bike frame ride. I don't get this. Can you explain how a bike's ride can be plush without, say, ensconcing the rider in a velvet recliner or somthing? I've never seen a bike with a velvet recliner attached (though I'd very much like to).

      I've ridden steel, aluminum, and titanium frame bikes, and would not describe any of those experiences as plush. Nor could I even really differentiate them much, other than by their weight (and cost, of course). And I do ride hard, in various terrain, sometimes fast, sometimes touring, never plush. Where and how should I ride to be able to notice plushness or the lack thereof?

      According to this site, all of these statements are false:

      • Aluminum frames have a harsh ride

      • Titanium frames are soft and whippy

      • Steel frames go soft with age, but they have a nicer ride quality

      • England's Queen Elizabeth is a kingpin of the international drug trade

      Of course, we know the last one is really true, but the point on bike frames is that the material does not affect the strength and stiffness as much as the quality of the tubing used. I think the same applies to bamboo, BTW, since accroding to this (and to a lesser degree this), properly selected bamboo tubes can be as stong or stronger than steel titanium, aluminum, and even carbon fiber. And that's not just tensile strength as the article mentions, but shear, yeild, and modulus as well.

      Pretty amazing stuff, that bamboo. Did you know that it can grow more than 2.5 inches per day? How about 8 inches per day!?
      --
      everything in moderation
  62. This Rocks! by travlinscotty · · Score: 1

    I guess I don't fully understand the nay-sayers. I do see the points people are trying to make: they don't trust bamboo, they don't use an aluminum bicycle so why should they want a bamboo bicycle, it's not stylish enough(?), it has no brakes, etc. None of these are the real point at hand. I think the real potential is in third world countries, where many people don't own any sort of bicycle. I just returned from 16 months abroad this spring. Some of that time was spent in Laos and Cambodia, riding a bicycle through relatively untravelled parts of the country (yes, mine was aluminum, but locally bought). Bicycles are not only a major form of transport there, but also veritable industrial machines, used to carry everything from giant sacks of rice to building materials to children. Often a family will only own a single bicycle, if that, which often the children must use to get to school, as school can be quite a distance from the home. The ability to have a cheap bicycle, made from sustainable materials is an incredible thing for these people. Think about it. They all have bamboo groves in the villages for building materials. The ability to completely rebuild your own bicycle from materials you have on hand is a great thing. Then, think about how many bicycles are produced every year to meet the demands of not only first world users (how many people do you know own one bicycle for every member of their family), let alone third world users. To be able to use a renewable, cheap resource, even for part of the bicycle's construction, is incredible. When I was in north east cambodia, I talked to some travellers who had visited a remote village where several of the children had some pedalless bicycles built entirely out of bamboo. Aparrently they were pushing up the hill, and coasting back down, but still I thought it was very impressive, and would have loved to have seen it. Not to sound fanatical, but I would love to own one of these bamboo bicycles. I currently don't own a car, and bicycle everwhere, and owning a bamboo bicycle, if for nothing else the pure novelty of it would be really cool.

    1. Re:This Rocks! by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      None of these are the real point at hand. I think the real potential is in third world countries, where many people don't own any sort of bicycle

      No, because a bamboo bike would be more expensive and less durable than a steel one.

      The ability to have a cheap bicycle, made from sustainable materials is an incredible thing for these people

      Except that it's impossible. Can they make a bamboo hub or chain? What about the lugs? Wheels? Gear wheel? Ball bearings?

      I'm sure in Laos you can buy cheap Chinese-made bikes. (Flying Pigeon, eg). They ARE ALREADY "sustainable". All they need are new tires every ear or so, and put some oil on the chain when it rains, regrease the bearings once a year or two, repaint every 10 years. You find little roadside shops where guys fix bikes (patch flats, fix most other problems with a hammer and a wrench) for pennies in the third world. (I've biked in Indonesia, Thailand and China.) With minimum maintenance they last for decades. Bamboo bikes are a novelty item for rich Westerners, completely useless to the third world.

  63. Bamboo Guitar to go with the Bike by madpierre · · Score: 1

    You can also get an environmentally friendly bamboo
    guitar to go with the bike. :-)

    http://www.giles.com/yamaha1/pressreleases/PAC/b am boo.htm

    --
    siggy played guitar
  64. Finally! by reelbk · · Score: 0

    I'll no longer have to lose sleep over the potential of the bamboo bike.

    --
    - A real programmer uses $ cat > a.out
  65. Remember your bike as a kid? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    I dont know about everyone else, but my first couple of bikes only had one speed and no hand brakes. To slow down you just pushed back on the pedals. Damned if i know anything about the mechanism though, i was just a little kid and didnt care.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  66. RTFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoa Beavis, this bike's made of grass

  67. I saw one at calfee by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    A guy at calfee has a bamboo diamond-frame bicycle with titanium components on the ends. For those who don't know they are like the name in carbon fiber diamond frame bikes. (And starting to work on recumbents too.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  68. Fixed Gear Bikes by Eightlines · · Score: 3, Informative

    Technically speaking it does look like a single speed, but also a fixed gear. A fixed gear bike has less moving parts and therefore less chance of breaking down. The downside is that you will want to choose a gear that deals best with the terrain you are in.

    My fixed gear bike is running a ratio of 46t/16t chainrings (over a 2:1 ratio). The one in the photo looks more like a 24t/18t (close to a 1:1 ratio). Bottom line is you won't be picking up too much speed on this thing, but it should make the hills easy to climb and momentum easy to stop.

    Are the brakes necessary? For this bike, no. You can quickly bring this thing to a halt and in a worse case scenario put your feet down for a Flintstones stop.

    1. Re:Fixed Gear Bikes by dhogaza · · Score: 1

      Denmark is very flat ... Christiana's even flatter except for the old fortress embankments that surround it and other areas on that side of Denmark.

      In places like Copenhagen and Amsterdam old one speed cruisers with hub brakes are the rule, not the exception.

  69. That's even more sustainable. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    I probably shouldn't have to point this out to geeks, but electrons make up approximately 0.1% of the ocean, by mass. They are also readily available in such common items as dirt, and renewable resources such as those that are grown for food.

    There shouldn't be any concerns about consuming too much electricity.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:That's even more sustainable. by timeOday · · Score: 2, Funny
      Dear Poster,

      Please use emticons in your future postings so we know whether to laugh with you or at you.

      Thanks,
      The Slashdot-reading public.

    2. Re:That's even more sustainable. by entartete · · Score: 1

      that's it! build a bike out of electrons!

  70. Sustainable? by heinzkeinz · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but 'sustainable' biking is, I think, WAY down the list of the earth's major environmental concerns. Come on!

  71. Grammar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arguably, that should be "...one of the most resource demanding materials that exists..."

  72. IF YOU BUY INSURANCE ON A BIKE YOU SHOULD BE SHOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  73. No way Jose! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I have twice been injured or nearly injured by metal bicycles breaking at the welded joints. If metal folds under pressure so easily, then what makes you think I am going to touch a Bamboo bicycle?

    (And please don't tell me to lose weight. That's my wife's job and she does it too well. The first breakage was when I was a skinny teen anyhow.)

    1. Re:No way Jose! by maroberts · · Score: 1

      OK, lets try and sell it to you. Wood has one advantage most metals don't - the ability to flex under pressure without snapping. A bicycle which exploits some of the natural give and take of woods may have some advantages.

      Second, if wood shatters, the bits are less likely to hurt so much as metal bits

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    2. Re:No way Jose! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      OK, lets try and sell it to you. Wood has one advantage most metals don't - the ability to flex under pressure without snapping. A bicycle which exploits some of the natural give and take of woods may have some advantages.

      Bamboo, and most woods, will tear apart after a few thousand flexes (maybe a few dozen). The bike flexes every time you go over a bump. So a few months at best. Good steel will flex not indefinitely, but for your lifetime.

      Second, if wood shatters, the bits are less likely to hurt so much as metal bits

      No, wood splinters. And bamboo much more so. It makes very sharp and deadly ones, in fact.

      Take a piece of bamboo, clamp one end, and twist it. After a few minutes you will notice it splitting lengthwise. It's very tough, and takes a while to break completely, but it's already useless and dangerous as a bike frame.

  74. Just what I was looking for! by Daniel+Baumgarten · · Score: 1

    Finally! A bike that I can feed to pandas!

    --
    "Screw slashdot." -- Linus Torvalds
  75. Slivers & Rattan by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Bamboo is prone to splitting and fracturing when under lateral strain. I would really hate to have one of those collapse under me due to lateral stress fractures. All those sharp slivers of bamboo right under my crotch?

    One of the primary reasons (even beyond weight and durability) why the SCA uses rattan instead of bamboo for weapon shafts in its mock "heavy" combat is that it does not splinter but instead kind of "pulps" when it breaks. The concern on the battle field is that splinters could easily be driven through helm eyeslots. There's enough risk in taking a blow or falling in armor during normal fighting that extreme hazzards like that are hardly welcome.

    After all, we can't have anyone getting hurt during a war, can we?

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  76. Bamboo is invincible! by Nindalf · · Score: 1

    The bamboo joint can't be cut!

    I'm not sure how you'd make a bike from it, though.

  77. Plants can grow elsewhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather than deforesting vast tracts of already endangered bamboo forests (which is already leading to the demise of the Panda

    Bamboo can grow anywhere you have sunlight, soil and the proper temprature.

    Considering some bamboo can survive -20 deg F, large sections of the planet can grow the grass that is Bamboo.

    not that the stupid beast deserves a future in the ecosystem

    After reading your post, I'd suggest the same be applied to you.

    1. Re:Plants can grow elsewhere. by thelizman · · Score: 1

      Bamboo can grow anywhere you have sunlight, soil and the proper temprature.


      The same holds true of trees in general, but the facts are that bamboo is being harvested faster than it is being grown (just like trees in many places).
  78. Right ON by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    I am a classical guitarist and have often thought of this possibility. I also fly fish and love old cane rods. There is nothing like bamboo technology! So a bamboo bikes make a hell of a lot of sense. Really picks my but when people ignore the craftsmanship of centuries and are ignorant of the real possibilities. Same thing goes for hemp, and I do not mean the kind you smoke. So all you enviro tech ignorant plastic and aluminum junkies can just eat dust. Oriental bamboo tech can replace much of the environmentally ignorant technologies of our wastefull western manufacturing methods. There is no reason why the two technologies cannot co-exist and mingle. If we reduce our dependance on resource hungry wastefull methods then this is the way of the future.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  79. It could be there. This is great for prototyping. by twitter · · Score: 1
    There's enough space hidden in that rear hub to contain a hub brake. I would want a long arm to stabilize it as opposed to the short one seen on steel frames and apparently absent from this one.

    My biggest complaint is the "sustanability" issue. I have a 20 year old steel bike that I ride almost daily. I have a baby seat on it and cary my two year old duaghter. That's not something I'd do with a bambo bike. Durrability is part of sustainability. How many times can you unglue that bamboo before you have to dispose of the knockouts that hold the thing together? Chome-moly frames are probably the most practical because they are high strength (yeah better than bamboo per weight), rust free and can be made without endurance limit. Direct use of petrolium to make composite materials is much better than burning the stuff and carbon composites have a fivefold strenth to weight ration advantage over aluminum.

    It's a beautiful and well designed bike and it encouraged in my speedbike experiments by this. I've got plenty of bamboo for prototyping and it's much cheaper than carbon composite tubing. Where did he get those knockouts? Time to hit the search engine. While this is good for a prototype, I would not sell one of these things to anyone but a young healthy person who understood that one day it could fail. For a real production bike, I'd fall back to composite materials or just plane steel.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  80. Uh, well, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, this is a completely rediculous conversation, kids. This bike is very clever, and I'm sure it works very well for the builder, but there is no way in hades you'll ever see such a thing manufacured in the US. Why? Liability. This bike may be fine for pedaling around the streets of Copenhagen, but I bet I could destroy it inside of 10 minutes on my favourite trails. True- that is not what it's intedended for, but in court that would hardly matter. It's a nice project and a great idea, but don't get any tree-hugging save-the-world ideas and quote lateral stress figures. Take some engineering classes and go visit a custom bike maker before you think you are qualified to think this is a good idea. It ain't gonna happen.

  81. 2 Things that make me worry by Whorbbit · · Score: 1

    Alright first off, I really do trust the strength of bamboo and its general ability to not snap in half. My problem is that the bar that goes from the handle bars to the rear axle only appears to be on one side, that really doesn't seem to structurally sound, I'd make two bars like that one and cross them to opposite sides of the rear axle underneath the crossbar. And the other thing, I really hope bamboo doesn't swell with water, otherwise the thing could work great one day, then the next after a rainy night all the bamboo would be rattliing in those sockets. Not sure if thats a problem with bamboo but it's something to look into. On a little side note, I would never ride this thing. It looks like an easy way to see how good bamboo can pinch skin. (Note the point where the cross bar intersects the bar running from the handle bars to the rear axle)

    1. Re:2 Things that make me worry by Maimun · · Score: 1
      And the other thing, I really hope bamboo doesn't swell with water, otherwise the thing could work great one day, then the next after a rainy night all the bamboo would be rattliing in those sockets.
      Good point, I thought about the same. Obviously, the frame must covered with some protective material often. So much for environmental friendliness, in several years the amount of lacquer used will negate the non-aluminium environmental gains :)
    2. Re:2 Things that make me worry by kcelery · · Score: 1

      When wooden floor tiles soaked with water, it would swell and buckle. So people find replacement of wooden tiles that wont expand under moisture, it happens that tiles made out of bamboo has such property.

  82. Will this really be practical? by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    "Building these bicycles is art. It is not something you just do. Every bamboo must be selected and fitted into the frame according to size and quality. The secret lies in treating and handling the material the right way. Learning that takes times and the maintenance takes time as well...? Flavio Deslandes says...

    Using bamboo may be some sort of holy grail for bike transport enthusiasts, but I seriously question its current practicality. Training and paying artisans to select the perfect materials and then assemble bikes would more than detract from the benefits bamboo provides. Steel bikes can be thrown together by machines.

    Also, simple steel bikes require little maintenance, and the little maintenance they do require is in the drive train, brakes and bearings, which would apply to bamboo bikes as well as maintenance of the bamboo frame.

    Is Joe Sixpack or Sally Secretary in Ho Chi Minh City, Beijing, Amsterdam or New York City really going to take the time to tenderly care for his/her commuter bike's frame? Think of the thousands of bikes in Japan that sit in the rain every day - would bamboo bikes survive even one year being wet most of the time?

  83. Tree Huggers Shouldnt Care.... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    First off bamboo is a grass, second, i dont think depletion is a big deal, because bamboo can grow a foot in 24 hours.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Tree Huggers Shouldnt Care.... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      Another one! When did I call Bamboo a tree?! Anybody else care to point out that fact?????

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    2. Re:Tree Huggers Shouldnt Care.... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      you said tree nazis, why should they care about a grass:p and in response to your username, mullets and star wars, a combination by people with way too much time on their hands

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  84. flaming hoops by yintercept · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bamboo is also flamable...which leaves out common activities like jumping through flaming hoops, or over a burning tar pit. Being made of wood, I really wouldn't want to ride a bamboo bike while juggling chainsaws. There are lots of arguments against bamboo bikes.

    Personally, I would love to see more natural fibers in bikes. Rather than making the whole bike from bamboo, making just a few pieces helps reduce the consumption from the titanium mines.
    Sig: Flamable materials are dangerous, which is why I always make sure the products I buy are clearly marked as "inflamable."

    1. Re:flaming hoops by ftzdomino · · Score: 1

      Magnesium and titanium are also flammable.

    2. Re:flaming hoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dude (or if you're French, doude), you can't ride a bicycle while juggling chainsaws anyway because you can't steer.

      Your complaint will be valid when they make the bamboo unicycle.

      True, bamboo does burn, but not very easily. You might as well worry about an aluminium frame suffering a thermite reaction. And, since drilling holes weakens bamboo (it encourages splitting), a composite bike would actually be less sturdy than an all-bamboo bike.

      Nothing you buy is flammable? So you have no soft furnishings and your clothes are made of copper foil?

    3. Re:flaming hoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nothing you buy is flammable? So you have no soft furnishings and your clothes are made of copper foil?
      He is making a joke about how funny it is that Americans proved so incapable of figuring out what inflammable meant that we had to replace it with the less mentally taxing "flamable." Apparently you are one of those people.
    4. Re:flaming hoops by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      You know, inflammable and flammable are exactly the same thing. You mean non-flammable.

      -uso.
      (-1, Troll)

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    5. Re:flaming hoops by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      Right from the article, bamboo is actually a grass, not wood. But I can see how chainsaws would hurt it nonetheless.

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    6. Re:flaming hoops by cyt0plas · · Score: 1

      Absolutly. I don't want to take the risk of my car exploding, so I only use inflammable gasoline.

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
    7. Re:flaming hoops by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      "Being made of wood, I really wouldn't..."

      May we burn you if you also float in water like the very small rocks?

  85. Bamboo is in at the moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not a bad thing, but it is a bit faddish.

    The new bamboo cutting boards are harder than rock maple and very beautiful. And I've been lusting after a new bamboo hardwood floor.

    The missus just got some invasive bamboo for the lower pasture and some arrow bamboo for over-wintering indoors. It may be a while before I harvest my first fishing pole however.

  86. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is there a reason why the SCA is made up of worthless geeks who want nothing more than to suck each others' med-ren loving cocks?

    1. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did your daddy beat you because you were gay?

    2. Re:But by black88 · · Score: 0

      Although I personally find the SCA to be silly, I find it equally if not more silly that some anonymous jerkoff behind a computer keyboard has the time to criticize and to mock the imaginary or real sexuality of those with whom he has never met in real life, and furthermore, I personally know SCA people, including career military men and women, who could probably thrash your sorry little punk ass and leave you in a sobbing heap of emotional wreckage and broken teeth. Besides, you got something against fags? I have often found in life that those who criticize and hate others only hate something which is a personal reflection of their character.

  87. Schwinn Lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Schwinn has now flexed it's IP rights and begun to sue bamboo farmers all across Southeast Asia. Farmers are being offered a chance to buy a bamboo license for 30 piestas apiece which allows them to continue harvesting their plants legally.

  88. One word... by Cordath · · Score: 1

    Splinters.

    And in the worst possible part of your anatomy too.

    1. Re:One word... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but i consider several pieces of my anatomy below the waist to be some of the best possible parts of my anatomy, although they might be some of the worst possible places to get splinters :)

      /grammar nazi

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  89. It's nice but by KingTank · · Score: 1

    A hemp bicycle would be much better.

  90. Every teenager's dream by Mr_Icon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kids, to those of you who just don't have enough reasons to be picked on and beaten up in middle school, we give you... THIS BAMBOO BICYCLE!

    Complete with a detachable frame for easier caning.

    --
    If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
  91. Re: Aluminum Frames by twelvemonkeys · · Score: 1

    "And besides, how many bicycles are actually made from aluminum or fancy alloys/composites? No bicycle I've ever ridden, I know that much."

    Try any road bike, ranging from low-end to high-end. Sure, the sexiest material to use nowadays is carbon fiber (i.e. Lance's Trek), but there are many many bikes frames that use aluminum. Cannondale might be the most famous for it (all they way up to their CAAD7 frame), although admittedly even Cannondale is starting to get into carbon fiber. Their latest frame, which Saeco is riding in the TdF, is a blend of both alumimum and carbon fiber.

  92. Why not? They had paper bicycles by pkhuong · · Score: 1

    Bamboo is used every day in Asia for contruction work (you use wood+steel, they use bamboo). Seems strong enough (in the right orientation, yes).

    I saw a paper bike from Japan once. I believe it was a research product, not something that was actually for sale. Still, it was the same kind of idea: use tight paper cylinders to have longitudinal strength. IIRC, it did not have a losange frame. It might have been to deal with the problem of tension, forces, etc applied in the wrong direction.

    Not exactly a new idea, but still cool. Maybe the design should be improved.

    --
    Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
    1. Re:Why not? They had paper bicycles by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Bamboo is used every day in Asia for contruction work (you use wood+steel, they use bamboo). Seems strong enough (in the right orientation, yes).

      For temporary scaffolding. Won't last longer than a few months at best.

  93. Mistaking coolness for spectacle by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    As I park the bamboo bicycle in front of the Shop in order to have a black currant juice it feels almost as if I am dismounting a Harley right next to a café

    Or the experience could more in tune with showing up on a flaming unicycle while wearing a clown suit. The only thing funnier would be if this conversation were taking place in a biker bar. I'm sure some good Harley riders would not hesitate to share their feelings regarding this very unfortunate metaphor.

    1. Re:Mistaking coolness for spectacle by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      Give the poor guy a chance he might have alot of trouble getting his black currant juice bottle out of the place the Bikers might put it!

      Big Bamboo tech is real cool shit though! I've used it for steelhead and salmon fishing old fashion style in big West Coast rivers. Once for once it is tougher than a Harley.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  94. By George... by thelizman · · Score: 1

    ...yeah, I did get that backwards. Aluminum is something like 8.5% to irons 5% of the earths crust...the point I had hoped to make is that aluminum is just waiting on a better production and smelting technology to come along.

  95. Finally! by davidwatdavidworg · · Score: 1

    I've been dreaming of this for years!

  96. Can't win for losing... by switcha · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is a strong step towards making bicycling more sustainable,

    Fine, get excited about the technology involved here, but spare me the statements like that. Everytime I ride to work, I keep a car or about 1/30th of a bus off the road. (I realize I'm not actually 'keeping the bus off the road', but work with me here.) I don't even need to go on about what a retarded statement that is, to call bicycles anything but a vehicle of sustainability.

    What's next? Smack-talking a water powered car because it's a drought season?

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  97. Hmm by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wonderful. Right up until you pull a wheelie, and the frame shatters and spits you from anus to esophagus. Yegads, but that's a big splinter you've got there, son!

  98. Re:Greenpeace by Wavicle · · Score: 1

    I would suspect that greenpeace is under stating how much of the ship is recyclable. After all if they said "100% of the ship is recyclable" nobody would care about small trace pollutants. If they said "85% of the ship is recyclable and 15% is pollutants" people would dismiss their claims as ridiculous, clearly less than 15% of the ship is non-recyclable pollutants.

    I think they stated the best number they could to support their agenda, but I wouldn't be suprised if the true number were around 98-99.

    --
    Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
    Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
  99. Steel? by scarolan · · Score: 1

    You've got to be kidding me. How much does a steel bike weigh, 50 lbs? I'll stick with my 22 lb mountain bike thank you very much.

    1. Re:Steel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much more expensive is your 22lb mountain bike compared to a 50lb steel bike? A shitload of money to a third world farmer... that's how much. Fucking idiot.

    2. Re:Steel? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yes, 22 lbs. is what my steel Mountain bike weighs as well. My sweetie's cheap hybrid comes in at 25 lbs. though.

      My steel road bikes are a bit lighter.

      The first 10 lb. track bike was made of steel for Major Taylor. . .in the late 1800s. Since then track bikes under 7 lbs. have been made.

      You weren't paying attention when I said that it takes very little steel to make a bike, were you?

      KFG

    3. Re:Steel? by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      I believe my 20-year-old steel-framed road bike comes in at 27 pounds. IIRC, the frame makes up a surprisingly small portion of the total -- wheels, tires, gears, chain, handlebars, brakes, etc. add up to quite a bit (although the picture in the article shows bamboo handlebars).

      For manufacturers in developing countries, one other potential advantage of steel over aluminum is the ease with which it can be worked. Bent steel can be straightened (bent aluminum tubes show a pronounced tendency to break when you try to straighten them). Welding steel is very easy, welding aluminum more difficult.

      The article describes the frame as being glued together. Glue that reliably binds bamboo to metal (in the picture, all the frame joints appear to be metal fittings) may not be made locally, or be all that "green". Does anyone know what goes into the manufacture of epoxy glues?

    4. Re:Steel? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      My steel bike weighs less than 19 lbs, fully equiped, and it supports my 235 lb. ass for 100+ mile rides.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    5. Re:Steel? by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 1

      My steel bike (Pegoretti GGM) comes in at under 20 lbs as well. A relatively inexpensive Lemond BA could say the same. Despite advances in Al and carbon fiber technology, high quality steel is still one of the best materials for a bike. I have no doubt that there are old steel Huffy's out there that approach 50 lbs, but you cant compare a 22 lb MTB which almost assuredly cost $4000 or more (Gunn-Rita Dahle's team issue Magnesium Merida weighs 22 lbs) to a garage sale huffy..... ca ya?

    6. Re:Steel? by skribble · · Score: 1

      High quality steel bikes (Renolyds 8xx, ture-temper XO, Columbus) are comparable weights to Aluminum. It depends on how the tubes are formed (butted, double butted.. etc).

      Steel can also be custom formed for ridgidy and ride, which you can't do very well with aluminum (which is always very riged). i.e. you can get some of the feel of an aluminum soft tail with a hard tail steel frame with significanlty lower weight and better lateral stiffness (which pivots all have).

      Aluminum is cheap though and you can get a decent aluminum bike for much less then you can get a decent steal frame. Steal bikes will outlast aluminum bikes if you ride hard though. Aluminum fatigues relativly poorly.

      That said TI has all the greatness of steal and it is lighter, rust proof, etc... and Carbon fiber is the new thing where the stiffness of aluminum is valued.. of course those are expensive.

      For a great, reasonabley prices steal frame check gunnarbikes.com if you want to spend more try sevencycles.com.

      --
      --- Nothing To See Here ---
  100. Taking A Tumble on a Bicycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you bust your ass on this thing, you'll wish everyone else but you had to ride bicycles made of stuff that grows in the back yard. Remember when Henry Ford had his engineers make a car out of soybeans? Lots of later uses for the technology and all, but he did get a lot of laughs at the time.

  101. Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Greenpeace is distorting the stats to support their position, they would be doing it in the opposite direction; the poster's point was that if ships were just scuttled greenpeace would probably be up in arms about it.

    At least fucking read the post before using it as an opportunity to bash your favorite environmental boogieman.

    1. Re:Dumbass by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Of course some ships ARE scuttled, yet you don't hear Greenpeace protesting, mainly because scuttled ships are used to grow reefs. Just make sure there's no oil in the hold and you're OK.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
  102. Impress me... by Wandering+Goliard · · Score: 2, Funny

    *knits, waits patiently for bamboo Intel chips*

  103. Re: Aluminum Frames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cannondale or Trek are probably not the class of bikes the third world is expecting to ride. More like Huffy, Schwinn... the types of bikes you'd find at Walmart or a random department store.

    Most people with modest means who just want to ride probably won't buy their bike at a bike shop which means they're going to buy a bike based on price or from a salesman that probably doesn't know a thing about modern bike technology. Simply put, the bike most non-cyclists are going to get is steel framed.

    Now again, do you think most bikes sold are steel, aluminum or carbon fiber. I'd say they're the mass marketed steel frames.

  104. What is Plushness? by salimfadhley · · Score: 1

    Its quite hard to describe what plush feels like - generally steel is at one extreme and alu is at the other. You really have to compare an expensive steel bike vs an expensive aluminum bike to feel the diference. Steel bikes are tough, but not 100% rigid. The result is that some of the bumps and buzz are taken out of the ride. You can feel it in your elbows, wrists, knees and ankles./ Alu on the other hand is much more rigid (being a softer lighter material they have to use fatter tubes so they tend to flex less). The result is that unless you have a whole load of suspension you get all the nasty road-buzz. The quality of ride depends not only on your frame & suspension but also on the wheels and cranks you use.

    1. Re:What is Plushness? by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 1

      A few less PSI in the tires does much more than any difference in frame material.

    2. Re:What is Plushness? by salimfadhley · · Score: 1

      Yes, softer tyres give you a softer ride - however your kenetic energy is absorbed as soft tyres flex - if you want your bike to roll easily you need to keep your tyres hard. The same goes for suspension - if you want to go fast or be sure that as much as possible of the energy you put into the system goes into propelling you forwards you might want to switch off your suspension. My bike has a small damper-control that allows me to lock the suspension off entirely. When you go downhill, you can see how hot breaking surfaces, tyres and suspension systems get... all that energy was once inside you! :-)

    3. Re:What is Plushness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few less PSI in the tires does much more than any difference in frame material.

      Sure, but now you've increased your rolling resistance. Keep the pressure high and the frame made of steel. 120-160 PSI in the tires of a steel-framed road bike is the classic combination of low-rolling resistance without bone-jarring vibrations and shock from the road.

      If you insist on riding Al, wrap yer handlebars fat and soft and get a good saddle.

    4. Re:What is Plushness? by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 1

      I know this thread is getting old... but for posteritys sake... On a well maintained track I'd agree with you, however, on a rough road (like the ones I ride) increasing tire pressure may actually increase rolling resistance. By reducing the size of the contact patch you increase the likelyhood that your tire will sink slightly into imperfections in the road surface. Dont think this matters? I pick up 3-4 mph when I ride on very smooth freshly paved roads vs. the very rough roads I normally ride.

  105. But wait! There's more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're caught out of food on a desert island (ok, don't ask me how the bamboo bike got there) you can cook and eat your bambucicleta. I eat bamboo now and then (my wife is Japanese) and it tastes good (no, not like chicken...).

    Try that with your aluminium or steel bike...

    1. Re:But wait! There's more! by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's a steel bike at least you'd get plenty of iron in your diet.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
  106. That's suspension of disbelief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A phenomenon ocurring when you watch TV or read Slashdot.

    Also, dupes abound and people watch/read the same things over and over and over...

    BTW, Mr. Editor, if you're going to dupe this story next week (haha, I really mean tomorrow), at least change it to oak next time...

  107. Re:flaming hoops and dangling participles by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    >Being made of wood, I really wouldn't want to ride a bamboo bike while juggling chainsaws.

    Riker: Nice to meet you - Pinocchio.

  108. Re:Steel is Real! - plushness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add to this, that we're talking 'unsuspended' bikes here. The feelable difference between a suspended bike of any two materials is below most humans threshold.

    I had a chro-mo framed hard-tail (unsuspended) mtn bike for a few years, and then had the chance to add an aluminum framed bike just like it to my stable. The chro-mo bike could be taken off the paved path into the river-rutted dirt beside it, and no need to slow down - it'd just fly through the rocks and ruts pretty darn stable. The aluminum bike, when put through the same maneuver, HURT! And controllablility was not as good - it wanted to bounce way too much. (and, yes, I've been riding a few decades now, and know not to make this compare on soft tires vs hard - thus the road-to-trail experience. Tires up to road pressure to keep rolling resistance down, then BANG - into the rough! That'll expose the differences.)

    Of course, some people are as sensually astute as a rock is smart, and they love to talk about how there's no difference if *they* can't feel it.

  109. This is all well and good... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

    until someone has an accident and ends up looking like the victim of a Viet Cong tiger trap, skewered by bamboo shards in a dozen places.

  110. Webpage of company (not yet featuring the bike) by gnalle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is the homepage of the company. They haven't added the bamboo bike yet, but, I have mailed them and urged them to add it http://www.christianiabikes.com/english/uk_main.ht m

  111. This Arugment Relies Upon A Fallacy by WookieOnTheRun · · Score: 1

    OK, just wanted to use my philosophy words- but in any event- the argument for the bamboo bicycle relies upoin the argument that it is more sustainable, which in relationship to bicycles is true, but, and this is a major but, the reality is that the unsustainability issues we face as a planet today come more from cars and industrialization, not so much from bikes. If bikes were the major form of transportation for the US (the most horribly unsustainable country in the world today) then this would be a major news piece, but its not. The answer is for more people to get bikes of steel, aluminum, carbon, hell even ti and worry about the sustainability of bikes after cars are on the downtrend (not that this will ever happen it seems)

  112. 5 words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Potassium Nitrate and diesel fuel.

  113. Wooden Bike by Soviet+Russian · · Score: 1

    I had a wooden bike once. Only problem was, it wooden go.

    --
    - - - - - - (c) 2005 Irrelevant Postings, Inc.
  114. Bamboo beer cans would be more useful by putaro · · Score: 1

    if you're worried about how much resources are consumed in making aluminum. Besides, most (and I mean MOST - not necessarily the best) bicycles are made out of steel.

  115. recycling steel? it's not perfect: by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1


    Metal: Melting Point:
    Steel 1500 C
    Aluminum 620 C

    source:
    http://www.weldtechnology.com/rwintrodu ction.html

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
  116. I can't wait to get one by binarybum · · Score: 2, Funny


    I'm going to keep it in my garage with my Segway(tm) and my electric car.

    I'll order one as soon as I finish this bag O-lean chips!

    --
    ôó
  117. Built in Christiania , Sweden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Built in Christiania and no built in bamboo hookah pipe? Must be an engineering flaw. Those guys make greatful dead fans look like yuppies.

  118. Cool by leoboiko · · Score: 1

    Environmental and durability isssues aside, this thing is darn cool! I could even make a Japanese mod with it...

    I hope this is cheap enough, I want one.

    --
    Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
  119. Re:recycling steel? it's not perfect: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word: Fission.

    5 Billion years worth of (practically) free power to smelt all you want.

    If environmentalists with the IQs of earwigs weren't being hoodwinked by the oil industry into believing that fission is bad, we'd have all the power we wanted. Instead, we have to breath polluted air and ride bikes made from popsicle sticks...

  120. LOL by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

    I've never heard a more ridiculous statement that "making bycicling more sustainable". Some people are just nuts, many aluminium plants are located near hydroelectric facilities (often built for that specific purpose), so the production of aluminium us perfectly sustainable too, just so long as it keeps raining.

    1. Re:LOL by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      ..."many aluminium plants are located near hydroelectric facilities (often built for that specific purpose), so the production of aluminium us perfectly sustainable too, just so long as it keeps raining."

      Uh.. dude - you dont make aluminium out of water...

    2. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you know hydro electric means?

    3. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was talking in terms of raw materials dumbass.

    4. Re:LOL by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      No he wasn't dumbass, he mentioned the power used to make the stuff, and if you know the industry then you know there's plenty of aluminium oxide to be had, it's separating the stuff that is the problem, it takes a shit load of electricity since it's basically smelted and separated once in molten form using electrolosis. This is the only real problem with aluminium production.

  121. Strength of bamboo joints by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1

    Except when they are young and growing. Each spring, I top off the bamboo in my yard and usually play around with a few pieces popping them into their segments.

  122. Expecially? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, pray tell, is an "expecially"?

  123. nice idea. by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    This is a really neat idea, but its hardly revolutionary.. If you aren't going for 100% metal free, its not that hard to conceive of how to use metal joints with bamboo for the straight pieces like they have done. Bamboo wheels may take some extra work, but its relatively easy to make a mostly bamboo frame. I am glad that someone had this idea though, in asian countries where there is little money but lots of bamboo, this could really help people.

  124. Douglas Adams isn't dead by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

    He's writing ad copy for a bicycle company in Copenhagen under the name "Steen Heinsen".

    Or so it would seem.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  125. Re: Aluminum Frames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me a bit about beer, arguing whether Samuel Adams beers are microbrewed or not, and which is the "best" microbrew.

    The reality is, 80% of the beer drinkers in the US don't give a damn, and will buy MGD, Coors or Budweiser, even if they do like microbrews.

    Most people who buy bikes in the US buy them at Wal-Mart or Sports Authority. They would not be willing to fork out more than $200 for a big "kid's toy". They ride it a few times after they get it, and 90% of those bikes then sit in the garage collecting dust.

    Which is OK, because for most of these people, a ride more than about 2 miles long, at about a running pace (5-8 mph) is a "hard" ride, not to be repeated again. They ride with seats too low, pushing too-large of gears, and complain about sore backs and knees. But adjust the bike properly for them, and "it's too bent over". They really should get beach cruisers instead.

    Which is what really most of the third-world bikes equivalently are...

  126. The Hemp Bicycle by kardar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if there is a way to use hemp in the manufacture of bicycles as well? Ford was experimenting building cars out of it, and using the oil from the seeds as raw material fuel to run those cars, but nothing ever came of that, unfortunately.

    They make houses out of hemp. There is a hemp pulp that gets mixed with the right minerals and you can build walls. So far, however, the shipping from France, which is where you can get what is sometimes called "hemp concrete" or "hemp cement", has been more expensive than the product itself, which is rather inexpensive, and a relatively inexpensive way to build a house, or a shed, or a barn, etc....

    Some hemp pulp and the right minerals to make a cement - molded into tubes or other shapes - maybe with a little bamboo helping out here and there... I bet you could make a fairly nice bicycle out of hemp products.

  127. It cant be cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It cant be mass produced. Even the writer tells how each piece of bamboo must be carefully selected by a trained eye. People will claim 3rd world labor is cheap, but its also cheap in a 3rd world bike plant

  128. Re:Steel is Real! - plushness by randyest · · Score: 1

    Why did you post this as AC? I accidentally noticed it, and it happens to be interesting (unlike most AC posts). I'm not trying to say the difference in feel is not there. I am, however, objecting a bit to the use of the term plush to describe anything related to a bike's feel. It sort of reminds me of some frog asshole describing a wine's bouquet as naughty. Even if it is right, it's, well, wrong.

    Anyway, by chro-mo I assume you mean chromium-molybdenum alloy. Right? And, you can tell the difference by going from smooth to rough terrain? Hmm, I can't. I am not trying to dispute that you can, just puzzled as to why I can't. I"m usually pretty sensitive.

    --
    everything in moderation
  129. I don't know the last time you rode a bike.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    However, the cogs on the rear part of the bike have a one-way fixing. When you are peddling to the best of your speed, and it is faster than the speed of the rear tire, you will be adding power to it through a proper contact.

    However, if the rear tire is rotating faster than you are peddling (or the cog is rotating), the teeth will not click in. This principle applies to essentially all bikes, except for tricycles which have the pedals directly connected to the hub of the driving wheel.

    The last time I rode my bike was 3 hours ago :)

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  130. Maybe if you paid for a good lock. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    I have a NewYork Krytonite lock. It cost me 160$ CDN. My bike has not been stolen, despite using it in place of my car since May. I will continue to ride it as such through the rest of my life, if possible.

    When I am at home or at work, I have a designated spot inside for it. When I am out and about, I properly lock it to something that is bolted down, and I ensure it's around the main part of the frame. People could break off my bell or drink holder, or even pop my tires, but those cost maybe 30$, and I have replacement tires on me at all times. My bike is insured by Kyptonie: if the bicycle thieves can break the lock open, either by pick or by brute force, and I file a police report, they will reimburse me for up to $3,000 USD.

    If you're using a chain lock or a U lock that cost 20$, it's no surprise your bikes have been stolen. If you're cheap, you'll get cheap. Spend good money on a quality bike, and spend good money on a quality lock. They'll cost the same in the end, because you won't have to rebuy new ones every year.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  131. Replace Aluminum with Bamboo Everywhere! by the+darn · · Score: 1

    I'll be looking for the cool bamboo computer case with a window in the side and blue lights...

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un post.
  132. Stability to ride? by Roy+Ward · · Score: 1

    As far as I recall, most bicycles have a bend in the front forks, so that the line of the rotation of the front wheel/handlebar assembly (can't remember the name) doesn't intersect the axle of the front wheel, but goes about halfway between the axle and the ground. This is to make the bicycle a lot more stable in the steering.

    I wonder how this is handled on a bamboo bicycle, where you can't put bends in the material? The photo doesn't make it very clear.

  133. Done before by kitzilla · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have seen bamboo and other wooden bikes done before.

    As some folks have pointed out, the problem with wooden bikes is that they flex. Badly.

    That means your chainline won't stay straight. It will rub, and the gears will try to shift by themselves. Note that the bamboo bike in the picture doesn't have derailleurs. There's a reason.

    To reduce flex, you have to increase the diameter of the bamboo tubing. At some point, it becomes impractical-- rather like riding a tree trunk down the street.

    The designer of this bamboo ride seems to have tried to compensate for the flexy tubing by adding a brace across the main diamond of the frame. It really won't help much if the rider is strong or heavy. The bottom bracket is gonna feel like it's made of rubber.

    There's also the matter of frame alignment. I don't care what you coat bamboo with--it's going to change shape with temperature and humidity. Even casual riders on low-end bambo bikes will be frustrated by a ride that doesn't track in a straight line.

    My dad used to race track bikes with wooden rims. They were notoriously dangerous. Riding a bicycle is risky enough without having to worry about being impaled by its wreckage.

    If you're really concerned about the resources consumed by aluminim or titanium framesets, there's always steel. Modern steel bike tubing approaches the low weight of aluminum and provides more forgiving ride characteristics. There are also cabon fiber and composite alternatives.

    The bamboo bike is a head-turner. But bamboo sucks as a bicycle frame material.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  134. Of course by Hugonz · · Score: 1

    This won't be as environmentally friendly if you use your panda fur gear while riding it. You know, that would look great.

  135. Typical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical environmentalist. They don't understand many things.

    "This is a strong step towards making bicycling more sustainable, expecially in contrast to aluminum, one of the most resource demanding materials that exist."

    Sure bamboo may be cheap. But labor isn't... oh wait, these are the same people who drive gas-guzzlers to enviro-get-togethers to chant and rave about the pollution of the world.

    Well you know what. Someone will have to hand-make these. These people don't care who makes them just so long as it's cheap(i.e. 3rd world).

    "Look we saved the world from the aluminum pigs of the world. We anticipate saving of aluminum at 40 tons per day. In addition we've saved the world from millions of people eating the world out of house and home. We anticipate a sharp reduction in these worthless creatures."

    F U environmentalists. People will always be more important than your adjendas.

  136. Re:Steel is Real! - plushness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1st - AC vs, say, yet another randomly selected, never to be used again, login name? Isn't that what AC is for? Maybe what you're trying to point out is this is a rather - uhm - supercilious forum when it comes to 'validity' of statements. And, maybe, with a 'regular' login, the 'score' would improve? Oh, well. I'll just have to live... ;-)

    2nd - "Plush". I find it amusing that - as a phrase - it's being picked on as inappropriate for the hard subject at hand. Among some microwave engineers, the word 'Fast', when applied to computers, make them wrinkle the brow in consternation, as "Huh? MHz and GHz are 'fast'? THz are fast..." It's all relative, and in that context, it makes perfect sense. Not that I expect the swarm of absolutests here to get that...

    Lastly - yes, chrome-moly. And that I could tell a difference suprised me! I've considered all the items that could explain the difference, even though I'd done as much as possible to level the comparison environment (same tire pressure, same stretch of trail, etc...). I've come to the conclusion it's a combination of material, frame geometry (fork 'rake' and rear frame 'trail'(?) can make a HUGE difference in road feel), and simple bike mass that leads to these differences.

    That aluminum is so light, added to it's rigidity, makes for a more subjectively harsh ride. Less forward mass means more opportunity for vertical deflection on any given bump.

    I still argue that the demographics of this place work against it in discussions like this. Many of the geeks here are so unsexed, they couldn't tell the difference between rubbing up against 000 grit sandpaper and a silk panty. And they pretend to have feedback on something this subtle? That's funny!

  137. Look Mommy! Aluminuminum!! by SkarTisu · · Score: 1

    At the very least, the bicycle in the picture on the webpage has aluminum:

    - Hubs
    - Crank arms
    - Rims
    - Chainring

    It's also likely that the frame lugs, fork crown, seat post, headset, bottom bracket and kickstand are aluminum.

    If the author is so dead set against aluminum, I'd like to suggest they remove all aluminum from the bike before jumping up on the anti-aluminum soapbox and banging their drum.

    Maybe they should be using titanium instead. I'm sure that's a piece of cake to process.....

    --
    rm -fr /bin/laden
  138. For the love of GOD by cmay · · Score: 0

    Is this what it takes to get posted on slashdot.... making a bike out of bamboo?

    What is the world coming to?

  139. the only question is whether or not by strictnein · · Score: 1

    Lance armstrong would still win?

    1. Re:the only question is whether or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Page Six of four hundred and fifty comments, and finally the first comment about Lance Armstrong. You Yanks really don't care about any other sport besides footballbaseballbasketballhockey.

    2. Re:the only question is whether or not by strictnein · · Score: 1

      we just get really bored with a sport when we dominate it =p First Greg, now Lance, what are the euro biker boys going to do?

      I love responding to post 5 days late.

  140. Well I by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    do need glasses

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  141. Sure buddy. by edunbar93 · · Score: 0, Troll

    From the article:

    Usually it takes quite a bit to make the roughies turn their heads

    This can also mean you look like a moron.

    It is beautiful, light and fast

    Light, perhaps. Fast, if you discount the fact that without gears acceleration is crap. Beautiful, no. I'm sorry, it's ugly as sin.

    As I park the bamboo bicycle in front of the Shop in order to have a black currant juice it feels almost as if I am dismounting a Harley right next to a café


    You're a nut. Also see first point.

    It is hard to find a disadvantage (to the bicycle) - except the material it is made from. Light bicycles are made from aluminum, which is one of the most resource demanding materials that exist.

    Every morning there's 30,000 single occupant motor vehicles on the road in your city, spewing thousands of tonnes of toxins into the air you breathe, held up by the accident on the freeway that killed two people, and you're worried about the resources spent *building* the bicycles that carry 1/30th that many people to work in the morning?

    Someday, when the biggest thing we have to worry about is the amount of resources spent on building an aluminum bicycle, perhaps then we can turn to bamboo. Until then, there are much better alternatives.

    "Building these bicycles is art. It is not something you just do. Every bamboo must be selected and fitted into the frame according to size and quality. The secret lies in treating and handling the material the right way. Learning that takes times and the maintenance takes time as well.

    Great. I want 1000.

    Oh wait... haha. Silly me. You can't produce these in a factory. It's an art.

    So um, they're not going to replace steel bikes?

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  142. Re:Steel is Real! - plushness by randyest · · Score: 1

    You might be an interesting person if you weren't such a prick.

    --
    everything in moderation
  143. environmental angle? by ragnar · · Score: 1

    I commute by bicycle and generally try to be friendly to the environment while the vast majority of my peers drive single occupant vehicles. Does anyone really expect cyclists to accept a guilt trip over the environmental shortcomings of a non-bamboo bike? On the whole I think my cycling is earth-friendly enough.

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
  144. Ever heard of Wattyl Estapol? IE transparent paint by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1
  145. So are the latest Lotus & Aston Martin cars by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Bonded aluminium is afterall a areospace technology

  146. Don't you mean a back pedal break? by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Adterall it your scenario one can't freewheel, which all bikes do

  147. Don't be a nong by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Virtually all single gear bikes have a back pedal braek,

    One just pedals backwards & breaking force is applied

  148. where have you been lately? by bodrell · · Score: 1
    The only bikes made from aluminum are the mid to high end bikes in the $500-$1500 range.

    In the past, that was true about aluminum frames--only the mid-range to higher-end had them, because it involves welding in an oxygen-free environment, is a pain in the ass, etc. But try to find anything BUT aluminum now. Even the cheapie bikes are made of it these days.

    In January, some asshole stole my beautiful (chromoly) Kona, and as a temporary fix I got a department store bike for around $100. And guess what it's made of? Aluminum. Yet it's heavier than my mom's old chromoly Trek.

    I've discovered that although aluminum was once really cool to have, nowadays many serious bikers think it sucks. Check out the comparison chart on this page here (caveat: they manufacture superior steel frames, but I believe the data is still valid).

    So that cheapo aluminum bike didn't get much use. As soon as I could, I got a frame made of Reynold's 853 steel. It's neck-and-neck with titanium (superior in many respects).

    To anticipate any defenders of aluminum, yeah, I know they're coming out with kick-ass alloys these days, like Scandium, but I'll still stick to steel for now, thank you.

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
  149. Check the sig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're not sure whether I like to joke, check the sig.

    Aside from that, I would guess that anyone who knows that the ratio of masses, electron to water, is on the order of 0.1%, would also know that the issue of electricity is the issue of energy.

    Anyhow, I thought it was funny. Apparently moderators thought your post was funny, to.

  150. This reminds me of onw of my favorite sigs by istartedi · · Score: 1

    "To escape from our own island, we must each metaphorically kill our own Gilligan" ----John Tornblad.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:This reminds me of onw of my favorite sigs by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      "To escape from our own island, we must each metaphorically kill our own Gilligan" ----John Tornblad.

      Hey, I like that :D

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    2. Re:This reminds me of onw of my favorite sigs by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the attribution. The first time I ever saw it was when Phil Plait used it at the University of Virginia. I got the attribution from Google, but Google's news archives also show Phil Plait as having the earliest USENET posting with that sig. Does anybody know of an earlier usage in some other medium?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  151. Look the word is ALUMINIUM - thats with an *I* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 13th element (Al) is named Aluminium.
    Somewhere along the way you Americans seem to have lost that last 'I' - time to learn the correct spelling please. I know its an extra syllable but you can cope it's not that hard.

  152. Re: Aluminum Frames by Bigboote66 · · Score: 1

    I pretty much agree with what you're saying, although I disagree with your characterization that the geometry & materials of a road bike constitute the "proper" bike. Sure, for extremely long distance riding (30 miles a stretch or more - and I know you're laughing at me for calling that extreme, but it is on the extreme end of how far people ride bikes) where absolute speed is most important, a road bike is probably the right geometry. But for just about all other uses for a bike, it's completely wrong.

    It could be argued that for long-distance travel where a certain amount of cargo needed to be carried, recumbent bikes would probably be better suited. And for urban biking, or biking on less than ideal road conditions, which would be the case for any "practical" bike (one that serve as primary transportation for someone), the standard beach cruiser, or some evolution of it is probably the way to go.

    The road bike geometry is hard on your arms & back (until you're "in shape", or have built up enough scar tissue to tolerate it), too fragile to handle city & country bumps, and too dangerous in traffic, especially if you're using clip-in pedals. Yeah, it's the most efficient, but only for atheletes.

    -BbT

  153. Re:Steel is Real! - plushness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay - the last bit was out of line, I'll admit.

    But, hey! You can meet an interesting persons fairly regularly on the net, but how often do you come across an interesting prick?

    My apologies to all offended.

  154. Recycling problems by TWX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Say I live in a fairly high-density city, in an apartment or condominium. I have a stove that is broken and old and not worth servicing to make functional again. It's dirty as hell, and just plain gross. Let's also so say that I don't own a truck. How am I supposed to recycle it? No one is going to come pick it up and still give me money for it, and even if someone is willing to pick it up for free to me, I still have to schedule and wait. However, there is the big trash can in the complex that is emptied three times a week, and I can get a couple of friends to help me heave it into the trashcan, and it'll be hauled off with all of the other garbage. Or, I can leave it sitting next to the trash can for it to be someone elses' problem.

    A large amount of consumer waste isn't metal, it's plastic, ceramic, glass, or silicon. Metal things generally last longer. The big things that are metal are the problems. Recycling needs to be made more practical for them to be handled right.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  155. Watch out for the new WWF commercial... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Featuring a panda riding a bamboo bike, then munching it.

    Ride your bike, and eat it too!

  156. I don't see any... by spike+it · · Score: 1

    I don't see any brakes on that bike. Add that to the list of problems.

  157. Your ignorance is showing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My trusty steel Lemond Zurich (Reynolds 853) tips the scales at under 20 pounds. It's for training and racing, and I chose steel over aluminum or carbon fibre very consciously. It wasn't at all about saving money.

    The difference between a steel frame and an aluminum frame is commonly no more than two pounds. It's all the other components, cranks, pedals, wheels, seat, etc. that add up to the 16 to 20 pounds that a decent race bike weighs nowadays.

    And why would someone -choose- steel, all else equal? Training and long rides on a steel bike is a dream, compared to aluminum. The steel absorbs vibrations and shocks in the rock that aluminum will mercilessly transmit up through the frame and into your hands, arms, and ass. When your hands and arms tingle for days after a weekend of training on an aluminum steed, you'll consider joining me in the pro-steel camp.

  158. Cat got your tongue? by luekj · · Score: 1

    But Flavio makes me see things differently: Bamboo is a resource of immense potential. And it is strong too. What makes it possible to build bicycles from it is that it is stronger than steel when strained in the longitudinal direction, 17% to be exact. First of all, who is this Flavio and why does he know so much about Bamboo? Secondly, how can I get my floors tiled with it. It's stronger than steel! How can you go wrong!? Plus it would look waaay cool, and most likely smell good. At least I hope so. If it smelled good, and if only I knew for sure...

    --
    Many Thanks,

    Luke

  159. Probably.... by Ratface · · Score: 1

    I live in Sweden and it seems like the majority of "shopping bikes" sold over here have coaster brakes. I would point out that these are NOT the same thing as a fixed wheel - you can stop pedalling without braking, you have to apply backwards pressure on the pedals in order to brake. I personally hate them, but my GF can't imagine riding a bike with hand-brakes.

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
  160. Doubt it... by Ratface · · Score: 1

    It's unlikely to be a fixed wheel, but instead it's probably a hub brake. With those you can freewheel and to brake you apply backwards pressure on the pedals. Hub brakes are extremely popular on "shopping bikes" here in Scandinavia - I would estimate that over 50% of the bikes on the streets here in Sweden have them. The advantages over a fixed wheel are that you can stop pedalling and rest your legs, plus a more controlled braking effect. Also if you take your feet from the pedals you run less risk of injury as the pedals don't continue to spin.

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
  161. danish bicycle maker did a bamboo bike! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this was over a year ago. see here:

    http://www.biomega.dk/html/frames/bio.html

    though its not made completely out of bamboo,
    most of the frame is. nice design also.
    http://gosub.dk

  162. Hub brake - not fixed gear... by Ratface · · Score: 1

    Yup, this bike is probably "single speed" - but it also probably has a hub brake rather than a fixed gear. This means that it can still freewheel (allowing the cyclist to rest their legs occassionally, and to remove feet from the pedals without the pedals continuing to spin), but to brake you apply a backwards pressure which induces a controlled brake effect. Hub brakes are very popular here in Scandinavia on "shopping bikes" - my GF hates to ride anything with hand brakes having grown up with hub brakes.

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
  163. Run??? by Ratface · · Score: 1

    What the hell are you talking about? You don't run on a bike - you cycle on a bike!

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
  164. Gilligan by FluffyG · · Score: 0

    will the seat be covered with poison ivy? will a vine be used as a chain? doesnt this remind you of gilligans island or what

  165. Bamboo doesn't rust! by kupci · · Score: 1

    Yes, but steel/aluminum won't rot,[snip] There is that rust problem though - there was an article recently discussing the millions (or billions) spent by the U.S. Army because of rust problems. Now there's a thought - bamboo fighter jets! Not too far fetched - anyone remember the Spruce Goose?

  166. Looming Meringue Crisis! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

    Sweet information! Just one picky question:

    Interestingly, to meet the US's entire current energy demands with solar electric, we would need to cover about half of our roads, at no net change in albumen.

    Are you saying that covering half our roads in solar panels would not affect the amount of egg whites available to the food industry? I beg to differ!

    It's a well-known fact that in order to ask, "Why did the chicken cross the road?" you must be able to postulate a road for the chicken to cross. If half our roadways are converted to solar power production, there would be chaos in chicken coops across the country! Whoever heard of asking "Why did the chicken cross the solar panels?"

    I predict a very large reduction in the country's albumen, to the point that Grandma's Lemon Meringue Pie will be available only in the most exclusive households. We must, as a society, decide whether this is a price we are willing to pay.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  167. Why did you throw grape juice on my airplane by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    FAKE glue holds it's airframe together.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  168. already been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there's some hippie in davis, ca who has one, since at least 1998.

    1. Re:already been done by silkred · · Score: 1

      You can buy one fron these people http://www.biomega.dk its called the Biolove and looks really cool with a shaft drive making it all very pure.

  169. dying by cosyne · · Score: 1

    ok, for the trolls, yes, death is a good way to reduce one's resource consumption. There are, however, more ethical issues surrounding death than there are surrounding not wasting gasoline. So until we come to a consensus on which people should die and which ones are worth having around, we'll just consider this to be a constrained optimization problem (the optimization is minimzing resource use, the constraints are things like don't kill people).
    On the plus side, there are fewer ethical issues surrunding population control, so can be an excellent alternative.

  170. Re:Done before (Bike Riding Risky???) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Risky? If I ride my bike 24/7, I can increase my life span by over 5X!

    From:
    http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/health/ risks.htm

    Fatalities per Million Exposure Hours

    Skydiving 128.71
    Snowmobiling .88
    General Flying 15.58
    Motoring .47
    Motorcycling 8.80
    Water skiing .28
    Scuba Diving 1.98
    *** Bicycling .26 ***
    *** Living 1.53 ***
    Airline Flying .15
    Swimming 1.07
    Hunting .08

    Data compiled by Failure Analysis Associates, Inc.