Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Create Radio Controlled Humans

utherdoul writes "Say goodbye to remote-controlled cars, say hello to remote-controlled people. Forbes.com (disclosure: I work there) sent a lucky reporter (further disclosure: I am jealous it was not me) to the SIGGRAPH computer graphics conference in Los Angeles, where NTT researchers debuted a device designed to exploit the effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation. As the story explains, when a weak electrical pulse is delivered to the mastoid behind your ear, your body responds by shifting your balance towards it. If the current is strong enough, it not only throws you off balance, but alters the course of your movement. Reading about it really doesn't do it justice -- you have to check out the crazy video of a remotely controlled woman. (Realvideo)"

262 comments

  1. Real? by xtracto · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sorry but... I dont do Realvideo... anyone has an AVI or at *least* an WMV?

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    1. Re:Real? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Just for the amusement factor of this video, I suggest you build an Intel Windows system and install Realplayer on it.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Real? by Dogers · · Score: 1

      Load it in FF, and its straight to RV
      Load it in IE and it asks if you want RV or WMP!

      Grr

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    3. Re:Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, so whats the problem with Real then? Sure versions before 10 was real shitty. Nowadays I actually prefer (if .mpeg and .divx is unavailable) real media. A player exists for my os of choice (Linux) with a nice and well integrated GTK2 interface. On OS X It's also fast an a lot better then the quicktime player. Neither Quicktime or Windows Media Player exists for Linux. WMP for OS X is a peice of shit and crashes frequently and on Windows it has got the worst interface ever seen in a media player. And everyone already knows how adridden and horrid Quicktime is for Windows.

    4. Re:Real? by Xorkid · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're running Windows, use Real Alternative, http://www.free-codecs.com/download/Real_Alternati ve.htm works great with Firefox

      --
      www.microsoft.com/athome/sec urity/children/kidtalk.mspx Was This Information Useful?
    5. Re:Real? by Bill+Wong · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or, if for some bizarre reason you actually want to install RealPlayer, the BBC offers a spyware/adware free installer for RealOne.

    6. Re:Real? by stam66 · · Score: 1
      Sorry but... I dont do Realvideo...

      I fully agree with you, realvideo is a stinking pile of poo... but i don't get why your post is modded "Score:2, Informative".

      Whatever the mods are smoking, please pass some my way!

    7. Re:Real? by Hallucienda · · Score: 1

      yeah its true, i used to despise it and didnt use it for a couple of years but i gave in a few weeks back and have to say it's far better. no more crap running in the background that re-enables itself etc.

    8. Re:Real? by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Anything that uses the "Real" Codec is most likely a piece of shit, and you just shouldn't bother.

      If you for some matter of life and death have to view one of these garbage codec encoded videos, go download Real Alternative.

      Another alternative for Win32 users is go google for "K-Lite Mega Codec Pack" and download/install the pack. That should take care of just about any stupid media format (as well as many not so retarded ones) that you'd need or want to play.

    9. Re:Real? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Why don't you use windows media player classic?It plays real vids great,Works with Mozilla(Both the suite and firefox)And doesn't install extra crap. BTW,The page has the player built in.Don't know if it'll work without the codec,But all i have is media player classic and it played just fine.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:Real? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      real is far better than windows media, yea i still cringe when i see the logo but they have made it not rape your system anymore and it streams better than wmv

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    11. Re:Real? by Announcer · · Score: 1

      Here, just plug this into your browser, and it will work in an older version of the REAL player. (I have V. 8. I refuse to upgrade beyond it.)

      http://images.forbes.com/video/fvn/misc/radiocontr olledhuman

      If you have Firefox, you can set it up to download the file, first. That's what I did. It's kind of weird the way she smiles thru the whole thing and almost looks a little drunk. It's narrated in Japanese.

      --
      Willie...
    12. Re:Real? by someone300 · · Score: 1

      Why? Helix/Real Player is just fine.

    13. Re:Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MPlayer will play realvideo, so you can keep that warm and fuzzy fealing of Stallman taking you from behind while everyone else continues living in the real world and not giving a shit.

    14. Re:Real? by xtracto · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      MOD PARENT UP.

      Man, that codepack is great! thanks a lot

      BTW here[ Download K-Lite Mega Codec Pack 1.34] is a direct download link for the codec pack

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    15. Re:Real? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1
      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    16. Re:Real? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      When looking for the codec pack, just google for "edskes" that's a pretty solid mirror.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    17. Re:Real? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      On my computer, Real 10 works like shit. The sound from it comes out all garbled, and if I'm playing music it won't even open. I'm running Ubuntu Linux, and as I understand, most people running Ubuntu have problems with Real, however, the movie player that comes with Ubuntu (Totem) plays windows media just fine, and as I understand, you can get quicktime to play on it too, but I haven't figured that out yet.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    18. Re:Real? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      I think she's trying it out for the first time, might be the TV reporter actually. She says "Hah, this is funny!" at one point.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    19. Re:Real? by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

      Careful with codec packs! I'm not sure which codec pack did it, but now Media Player can't play MPG's anymore. Had to install VLC.

      Codec Packs = dangerous! Use with caution! When in doubt, grab a copy of G-Spot, figure out what codec the file uses, and download just that codec.

    20. Re:Real? by ryaxnb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RealPlayer has mellowed it's act. The new version, RealPlayer 10 is advertising-ridden and tries to take over your filetypes, but tell it no and it actually listens.

      On the Mac it runs great.

    21. Re:Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats weird, I've never had problems with any of the K-Lite Mega Codec Packs. (It comes with G-Spot included, for those who haven't tried it.)

      Did you install it with default options? What player are you using?

      I've totally stopped using the crappy Windows media player and used the included BSPlayer or Media Player Classic since I discovered these Codec Packs.

      Google for "Codec Final Builds" to find the eskdes mirror site. or www.filesharingplace.com is always a good site to visit for your codec and P2P needs.

  2. Great .. by torpor · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. I for one welcome our new remote-control weilding overlords, and remind them that, as a devoted member of their volleyball team, disco enclave, and cow wash, I'm perfectly qualified to serve drinks at their orgies, fresh coppertops and all ..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Great .. by gauchopuro · · Score: 3, Funny

      As can be clearly seen in the video, the woman being controlled was not wearing a tin-foil hat. No one wearing such a hat has ever been controlled in this way.

    2. Re:Great .. by torpor · · Score: 1


      What part of devoted member do you not comprehend?

      No need for tin-foil baby, sign this pony UP!!

      (yes, i admit, i would rather weild the whip, perhaps a chariot or two .. but i'd give the reverse a try any given Sunday, were i asked ..)

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    3. Re:Great .. by HUADPE · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worst part of this whole thing is, the tin foil would probably work. Oh dear, here come the "paranormal experts." Run. Now.

      --
      This sig has not been evaluated by the FDA. It is not designed to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease.
  3. pr0n! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, all those pr0n stories about mind control are finally going to be possible!

  4. Remote-control women? by SlashEdsDoYourJobs · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, hope women will welcome me as their new remote-control-weilding overlord.

    1. Re:Remote-control women? by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      That's the main market, but don't forget there's also a possible niche for suicide bomber recruiters (there is a major labor shortage there, only idiots take a job with such lousy carreer opportunities).

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    2. Re:Remote-control women? by SlashEdsDoYourJobs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      there is a major labor shortage there, only idiots take a job...

      Come off it. There's no shortage of idiots in the world.

    3. Re:Remote-control women? by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      suicide bomber recruiters (there is a major labor shortage there, only idiots take a job with such lousy carreer opportunities

      yeah, but these dudes expect to be instantly promoted to *heaven.*

    4. Re:Remote-control women? by Rhoon · · Score: 0

      I, for one, hope women will welcome me as their new remote-control-weilding overlord.

      Yes, there is now hope for you having sex in your lifetime.

      --
      "If all the world's a stage, I want to operate the trap door." - Paul Beatty
    5. Re:Remote-control women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...hee hee...it would be really awesome to masturbate to the real thing! Oh wait...

    6. Re:Remote-control women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but 72 virgins is a remarkeably limited view of heaven. I mean why would you need more than one virgin? unless you're planning to take their virginity, but eventually you'll run out, non? And they never say WHY they're virgins. maybe they're virgins because they are so hideous that even the burka does conceal the ugly.

    7. Re:Remote-control women? by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1
      In Mother Russia, you don't control the remote. The remote controls you!

      I feel better now that this has been said.

    8. Re:Remote-control women? by same_old_story · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure this will make a lot of parents very happy.

      no more leashes or other low tech brat-controlling hardware.
      maybe I will give parenthood a shot once this is working well enough... and scriptable through python...

    9. Re:Remote-control women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm a muslim, and I've read the whole Quran, and
      know by heart a lot of the sayings of prophet
      Mohammad, and I've never seen any mention of those
      72 virgins.

      heaven is described in detail in the Quran, it
      mentions both sensual pleasures ( the luxorius
      palaces, the riches, the food, and yes even the
      women ) and spiritual ones ( being with God and
      angels and prophets and that seeing God's presence
      is simply the best joy ever to be).
      but there is no mentions of those 72, I'd like to
      know the origin of this thing attributed to
      muslims.

    10. Re:Remote-control women? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      " yeah but 72 virgins is a remarkeably limited view of heaven. I mean why would you need more than one virgin?"

      Maybe it's 72 at any one time. Perhaps they rotate out, so you get a new batch of 72 every once in a while. And maybe you can multitask. Heaven may be more flexible than you think.

      At least muslims have a travel brochure. Jews and Xians have intense views on what hell is like -- check out any Sunday morning megachurch broadcast -- but heaven is badly sketched in. As it stands, hell seems like it has more variety. Lots of stories about harrowing hell, but not may about invading heaven. It's like invading Seattle.

    11. Re:Remote-control women? by fwunkdoodle · · Score: 1

      No no no... there has been a miscommunication all of these years... ... it is not 72 virgins, rather *one* virgin that is 72 years old...

      oops...

    12. Re:Remote-control women? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Remotely controlled women? I just wish I could control the local ones.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    13. Re:Remote-control women? by superyooser · · Score: 1
      I'm a muslim, and I've read the whole Quran

      Then you should be familiar with sura 7:157 (and other verses of the Quran), which Muslims around the world cite as a directive to follow hadith.

      The text about 72 virgins is in Hadith number 2,562 contained in collection Sunan al-Tirmidhi.

      Sunni Islam accepts this collection of hadith as canon. Other Islamic sects may afford it less honor, authority, or credence.

    14. Re:Remote-control women? by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      huh? The xtians have a pretty good picture of heaven. Jesus will make a heaven on earth. So it'll basically look exactly like it does now, but probably with more mature humans.

  5. The secret of the Nintendo Revolution... by utexaspunk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, here's the secret new interface paradigm promised by the Nintendo Revolution. Beware, though!- firmware v2.0 turnes it into an enslavement device, and the rest of us will have to fight an army of 8-16 year olds! (plus a few older /.ers...)

    1. Re:The secret of the Nintendo Revolution... by wolvie_cobain · · Score: 1

      tinfoils joystick to everybody!!!

      HOORAY

  6. Interesting application by ReformedExCon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They researchers discuss using the method to generate vertigo and "centrifugal forces" for gamers. If it works in gaming, it will no doubt find a way into simulator training for military operations too. The applications aren't exactly endless, but there does seem to be a market for this.

    I wonder if it is painless. Except for the falling over, I mean.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:Interesting application by Civil+Beast · · Score: 1
      If it works in gaming, it will no doubt find a way into simulator training for military operations too.

      Surely you meant the other way around, right?

    2. Re:Interesting application by RobM9999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, The video games play you.

    3. Re:Interesting application by william.gunn · · Score: 1

      about your sig....what was he doing in your past to begin with?

  7. hmmm....balance enhancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder if it'll be eventually useful to prevent falls in the elderly...and maybe enhance balance for soldiers in combat...

    1. Re:hmmm....balance enhancer? by Jippy+T+Flounder · · Score: 1

      dude, if a soldier requires that tech, maybe he should be desk-jockeying? just a suggestion, but i know *i* wouldn't want soldiers in my team to need that shit...

      i kinda have a vision of us setting up an ambush, trying to be deadly quiet, when suddenly "HRK!!" *CRASH* and the guys flies out into the open as if he's been kicked in the teeth.

      that could be the beginning of a VERY unpleasant day.

      --
      ---- I was woken up this morning by a face full of fur. Damn cat thought my head made a good pillow.
    2. Re:hmmm....balance enhancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might be nice for it to kick in if your sniping off a line on a building.

  8. So THIS is what contrails are about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This must be what all the contrails in the air are about: metal particles expelled in streams by government plains may look like cloudy water vapour, but are not. Once dispersed, the metal bits gently float to the ground level where they are inhaled by humans. These particles were specifically chosen for the way they crystallize inside the bloodstream and brain, giving them a particular shape that responds to specific radio frequencies, allowing the gov to control us.

    I approve of the showcasing of this technology: it exposes the very frightening but very real effects of this technology, so no longer can people like me just be called "conspiracy-nutters."

    1. Re:So THIS is what contrails are about. by The+Slaughter · · Score: 1

      Yes.. nobody will call you a nut anymore...
      Hey, wait a sec...
      Let me guess.. the only thing that blocks these contrails...
      -- a tinfoil hat?

    2. Re:So THIS is what contrails are about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, exactly! The tinfoil hat! Finally, a Slashdotter sympathetic to those affected by scurillous charges of nutcasery.

    3. Re:So THIS is what contrails are about. by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to only trust the ones you make!

  9. In Mother Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In mother russia.....wait...never mind.

    Oooo...picture them in a beowulf cluster.

    1. Re:In Mother Russia by sosume · · Score: 1

      *puts on tin foil hat*

    2. Re:In Mother Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Mother Russia Beowulf cluster of these things imagines you.

    3. Re:In Mother Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, remote-controlled people control YOU!

  10. Direct video link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


    here[realmedia]

    should save you enduring over 20 !! adverts, 2 tracking scripts and 5 advertising companies trying to take your information without permsission

    1. Re:Direct video link by JThundley · · Score: 1

      Thank you AC, but here is a more direct link.

  11. If you wanted to fight it by Council · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you want to fight it, all you have to do is go limp.

    It can't force you to walk anywhere, it justs makes you tip in one direction or the other, and your automatic walking reflex keeps you under your center of gravity.

    The video didn't look all that "crazy". It was just a woman walking around with a dazed expression and silly grin. We can only assume she was under control of the remote.

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    1. Re:If you wanted to fight it by Berner · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It would however stop you from doing anything. Put this device behind the ear of people with a history of violence and a restraining order against them, when they get to close a transmitter will activate it and the offender takes a walk in another direction.

    2. Re:If you wanted to fight it by RevengeOfPoopJuggler · · Score: 3, Funny

      It can't force you to walk anywhere

      That's why they have a midget follow you around with a sharp pointy stick.

    3. Re:If you wanted to fight it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure your brain would learn to ignore the suspect signal over time, like with "sea legs". Or, since most people with a history of violence abuse alcohol, they might have already developed the necessary skills to stagger where they want to be even though some of their senses are awry.

    4. Re:If you wanted to fight it by Council · · Score: 1

      I find a good, hefty brick to be just as effective. Don't know why the police don't agree.

      They say you should never hit a man with a closed fist, but it is, on occasion, hilarious.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    5. Re:If you wanted to fight it by imsoclever · · Score: 1

      Who is also remote controlled.

    6. Re:If you wanted to fight it by distantbody · · Score: 1

      "sharp pointy" ...redundancy alert! :(

    7. Re:If you wanted to fight it by CaseyB · · Score: 1

      If a stick had a sharpened edge along its length, with a blunt end, it would be "sharp" without being "pointy".

    8. Re:If you wanted to fight it by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      Probably. Balance is incredibly complex, and it's common for the body to quickly adapt when one signal conflicts with another.

      This research has some medical use; I can see it being used to treat persistent vertigo.

    9. Re:If you wanted to fight it by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      I might prefer the slapping midget from "Master Of Disguise"...

    10. Re:If you wanted to fight it by timeOday · · Score: 1
      There might not be enough midgets to go around, but a shock collar is easily remote-controlled and would do the job just fine.

      I can't say for sure, but making a remote-controlled human might be as easy as putting one two probes in the brain - one to stimulate euphoria, the other disphoria. Then just call them on a cellphone a tell them what to do, and push the "nirvana" button to make them feel good about doing it. If they resist, push the "unbearable torment" button for a moment. There's no need for low-level muscular control; the system bypasses all the usual indirect instruments of pleasure and pain such as money, fear, blackmail, and so forth.

      Please tell me there's a hole in this argument.

    11. Re:If you wanted to fight it by MrAndrews · · Score: 1

      So the logical next step is to hook the whole contraption up to a GPS system and if they continue walking in the forbidden direction, it just keeps cranking up the level of the pulse until it could no longer be ignored, knocking the subject right over. It's basically just an electronic vertigo machine... I wonder... if you took Gravol first, would you feel the effects as much?

    12. Re:If you wanted to fight it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even need to put probes in the brain. Simply allowing somebody to become addicted to a very powerful pleasure-inducing drug, controlling distribution of said drug, and then threatening to withhold access to it given any "misbehavior" would all accomplish the same thing, without any messy surgery.

    13. Re:If you wanted to fight it by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

      A person enslaved in such a way would not have full control of his or her mental faculties, would likely have chronically poor physical health, and a drastically reduced lifespan. Drug addicts don't make good workers or do a good job of raising the next generation of workers... which is the primary reason those types of pleasurable drugs have been made illegal.

      I'm not aware of any powerful pleasure-inducing drugs that don't have these types of consequences. Even if one were immoral enough to enslave someone in this way, it wouldn't work very well.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    14. Re:If you wanted to fight it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could remove the device. I doubt it's imbedded into your skull.

    15. Re:If you wanted to fight it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Please tell me there's a hole in this argument.

      There's a hole in that argument.

      Oh, wow, God, it felt good to say that.

    16. Re:If you wanted to fight it by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      Yet.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    17. Re:If you wanted to fight it by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1
      If the ground tilts beneath you, adjusting your centre of gravity outwards from your feet, you'd reflexively adjust your stance.

      More subtly, as you are standing up, you're constantly adjusting your weight on either foot, as you sway around. This is detected, I assume, by the ear, therefore going limp probably wouldn't work. It would likely be possible to override it, however.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    18. Re:If you wanted to fight it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Johnboi Waltune says: A person enslaved in such a way would not have full control of his or her mental faculties, would likely have chronically poor physical health, and a drastically reduced lifespan. Drug addicts don't make good workers or do a good job of raising the next generation of workers... which is the primary reason those types of pleasurable drugs have been made illegal.

      Well there's the irony of the whole "war on drugs" right now. Certainly there are millions of unexplored chemicals out there, SOME of which might very likely provide some of the pleasure or mind-expansion without the common physical and social side effects you mentioned.

      Your claim that the current batch of drugs has been made illegal because of these side effects is laughable. MDMA (ecstasy) and LSD were used quite effectively in psychotherapy for years before being made illegal, and THC (marijuana) in proper doses can have very positive effects on mental well-being and pain management.

      These drugs were made illegal because of three simple reasons:

      1. They are a threat to large corporate interests and powerful (rich) lobbies such as alcohol and tobacco industries (both of which, by the way, don't do a very good job of making "good workers" either, if you consider hangovers, altered behavior, addiction, health costs that lead to increased insurance costs, etc.).

      2. Governments fear the results of true vision, in which humanity might realize there are better ways to live than being enslaved to antiquated systems of laws based on protecting special interests and preserving wealth and power in the hands of few.

      3. In this era of sound-bites and pervasive shallowness, "socially conscious" (left) and "morally driven" (right) politicians coopt the war on drugs as a weapon in their arsenal to gain constituency, because their constituents are too blind to see beyond the superficialities of the issues anyway.

      That being said, I definitely agree to some extent that being a "good worker" is part of the reason for illegalization, which I would put under my #2 above. Humans are willingly enslaved to a capitalist system, and the better the worker, the better the consumer, so bad workers are not desirable. This is a sympton of the system itself, though, and apparently only escapable via death or homelessness, neither of which I would encourage.

      But the main point I want to make is what I said first. There are tons of possible avenues of research with respect to various chemicals effects on human brains. It is pretty damn sad that almost all of it is illegal.

      And the last point I want to make: think about what you consider a "vitamin". That's just a chemical. There's lots more of those out there that are good for you, and we can't even look for them.

      To enlighted beings many hundred years in the future, this period of time will look as backwards as the Sharia (extreme anti-progress Islamic) rules of the Middle East. And yet, when you're stuck in the system, it all seems to make sense.

    19. Re:If you wanted to fight it by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      ah, like coffee, alcohol, cigarettes, and sugar, and the meaningless jobs people hold to maintain the machine that produces more coffee, alcohol, cigarettes, and sugar. Oh, did i forget tv?

  12. Isn't this what they use to control Dick Cheney? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sorry, I mean, isn't this what Dick Cheney uses to control George Bush?

  13. Can someone transcodcode this to theora please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thankyou

  14. For those who hate Real by ReformedExCon · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
  15. fine by Viraptor · · Score: 1
    ...of a remotely controlled woman.
    OK... but PLEASE! Don't do the version for men.

    (please remote-controlled-mod-down every "I'm a woman, you insensiti...." reply :)
    1. Re:fine by Eugene+Webby · · Score: 0

      What women, this is slashdot! :)

    2. Re:fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am a remote-controlled man, you insensitive clod!

      "[rrring] . . . yes, honey?"

    3. Re:fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your just trying to steal all the +1 funny points you insensitive clod.

  16. I would buy that! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just watched the video and it is way cool.

    Unlike those dopey walking and dancying robots which I have no interest in, if Sony would just bring to market the "remote controlled goofy japanese cutey" I would buy one, heck I'd even go for two and get twin models -- they could remotely control each other when I get bored with doing it myself.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:I would buy that! by Viraptor · · Score: 1
      ...they could remotely control each other...
      Nice idea... what you get if you give 2 people devices to control each other?
      If one makes the other to make him to.... Human behaviour fractal?
    2. Re:I would buy that! by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      you've never seen the De. Marvin Monroe family therapy episode of the Simpsons?

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    3. Re:I would buy that! by danila · · Score: 1

      I think you may be interested in La Femme Objet, a film about a remote-controlled goofy non-japanese cutey. Incidentally, besides being interesting the movie can also serve another function - namely to facilitate masturbation, which might be extremely useful to you, given that in the foreseeable future you are unlikely to find sexual satisfaction with either a real woman or a remote controlled cutey from Sony......

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    4. Re:I would buy that! by fbjon · · Score: 1
      Imagine having two people facing each other with controls to each other, but telling them that their controls are to their own neck-sets. Then directing them to do identical movements for a while, and then let them do their own controlling, thinking they are controlling themselves: Chaos!

      Or, imagine lining up 100 people on a field, making them walk in one direction, and then controlling them. Instant North Korean Parade!

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  17. connect a random generator to the controller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    and you can walk like a drunk without having to drink :D
    isn't sciense marvellous these days :)

  18. Mod parent up! by Virak · · Score: 1

    Please?

  19. Honey would you grab me a beer...? by The+Slaughter · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Honey, get me a beer?" "I'm busy." "I said... a beer, woman!" *zap* "Thank you." It works in reverse too.. "Honey, can you finish building the deck?" "I'm busy" "I said.. finish building the deck!" *zap* Yknow it really brings new meaning to couples fighting over the remote control....

    1. Re:Honey would you grab me a beer...? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They should add "quick path" buttons to the remote controllers:
      a) collect GPS readouts of the subject's path
      b) provide way to create macros (manually navigate her from sofa to fridge, then use the system to automatically create a macro for reverse navigation fridge to sofa)
      c) control your wife with few easy to use buttons

      Sorry, but I am not finishing this with a "profit" list item...

    2. Re:Honey would you grab me a beer...? by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      Except getting your woman to get you a beer would return you a beer. Your woman getting you to build a deck would return a footstool.

  20. The perfect gift by TGIFF · · Score: 1

    This would be the perfect gift for any husband.

  21. Careful what you wish for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    My powers of prediction tell me that such a position would have an extraordinarily short life expectancy. Particularly, for a slashdot reading marshmellow, that bitches about the editors, while living in his parents basement like a trapdoor spider; pouncing on 2L bottles of Mountain Dew and bags of snackie-cakes that wander too close.

    1. Re:Careful what you wish for.. by poopooboi · · Score: 3, Funny

      like a trapdoor spider; pouncing on 2L bottles of Mountain Dew and bags of snackie-cakes that wander too close.

      Sir, you owe me a coffee and a new keyboard.

    2. Re:Careful what you wish for.. by msim · · Score: 1

      haha, goddamn aint that the truth. i'm just lucky i wasn't eating or drinking anything when i read it.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  22. Your rights online by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gee, this should be posted in Your Rights Online :-)

    And send that woman right to my bed!

  23. Chinpokomon! by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1

    Mr. Ose: What is the Primary Main Objective?
    Kids: To destroy the Evil Power!
    Kyle: ...Power.
    Mr. Ose: Yesuh. Anda what is the Evil Power? [no one answers] The Evil Power is the UNITED STATESUH GOVERNMENT!
    Chinpokomon!

    1. Re:Chinpokomon! by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Japanese woman pops out from the side of the screen.

      "Time to bomb the harbor!" ....

      Yeah, good episode, I really think this would be more of an X-Box device for some reason.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  24. Re:Isn't this what they use to control Dick Cheney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dick controls Bush, it's just the natural way.

  25. Obviously a virgin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dick controls Bush, it's just the natural way

    Keep telling yourself that, nerdboy.

  26. a new twist to the SnM indinstry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagin the possabilitys

  27. abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Women aren't for nerds :))
    Just like the title says, radio-controlled
    That's the only snatch you'll be getting :))

  28. AVI direct link by castlec · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
    1. Re:AVI direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ASF file linked above is, surprisingly, in divx3 format and plays just fine in MPlayer.

    2. Re:AVI direct link by xmodem_and_rommon · · Score: 1

      by the way, the ASF/WMV above plays fine using vlc on linux

  29. robots by racerxroot · · Score: 5, Funny

    must... watch... video... can't ... control... own.. movements... ahhhhh!! So, we have androids that look and feel alot like humans (earlier /. article), and now we have people that act like robots. this is getting a little too weird for me.

    --
    --- Caffeine is directly responsible for some of my greatest ideas, and some of my most embarrassing moments...
    1. Re:robots by stefficus · · Score: 1

      damn. i just KNOW i left my uncanny valley around here someplace...

    2. Re:robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, those fithly robosexuals can bite my shiny metal ass!

  30. mplayer command line by alanw · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:mplayer command line by alanw · · Score: 1

      But you'll need to take out the space that the slashcode put into the URL. Can't find any way around it.

    2. Re:mplayer command line by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Actually you won't. The link is correct, even if it looks wrong. just click on it and it'll go to the right place.. but if you copy and paste the text, it won't work because of the space.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    3. Re:mplayer command line by t35t0r · · Score: 1

      unfortunately mplayer does not work on the rm or the asf posted by someone else. Only the audio works. But both audio and video works fine in xine!

    4. Re:mplayer command line by alanw · · Score: 1
      unfortunately mplayer does not work on the rm
      Works fine for me:
      (some munging to remove "junk" characters to get past lameness filter)
      $ mplayer http://images.forbes.com//video/fvn/misc/radiocont rolledhuman.rm
      MPlayer 1.0pre6-3.4.3 C 2000-2004 MPlayer Team
      CPU: Advanced Micro Devices Athlon 4 /Athlon MP/XP Palomino Family: 6, Stepping: 2
      Detected cache-line size is 64 bytes
      CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 1 3DNow2: 1 SSE: 1 SSE2: 0
      Compiled with runtime CPU detection - WARNING - this is not optimal!
      To get best performance, recompile MPlayer with --disable-runtime-cpudetection.

      77 audio & 188 video codecs
      Failed to open /dev/misc/rtc: Permission denied it should be readable by the user.
      Can't open menu config file: /home/alan/.mplayer/menu.conf
      Menu inited: /etc/mplayer/menu.conf
      Playing http://images.forbes.com//video/fvn/misc/radiocont rolledhuman.rm.
      Resolving images.forbes.com for AF_INET...
      Connecting to server images.forbes.com[12.120.81.15]:80 ...
      Cache size set to 320 KBytes
      Connected to server: images.forbes.com
      Cache fill: 15.00% (49152 bytes) REAL file format detected.
      ======= WAVE Format =======
      Format Tag: 26995 0x6973
      Channels: 1
      Samplerate: 16000
      avg byte/sec: 16000
      Block align: 320
      bits/sample: 16
      cbSize: 10
      Unknown extra header dump: 0 0 6 0 3 0 40 1 0 0

      Not audio/video stream or unsupported!
      VIDEO: RV30 [30203002,000A9030] 320x240 (aspect 0.00) 15.00 fps
      VIDEO: [RV30] 320x240 24bpp 15.000 fps 0.0 kbps ( 0.0 kbyte/s)

      Opening audio decoder: [realaud] RealAudio decoder
      opening shared obj '/usr/lib/win32/sipr.so.6.0'
      Audio codec: [3] 16 Kbps Voice
      Audio bitrate: 16.000 kbit/s (2000 bps)
      AUDIO: 16000 Hz, 1 ch, 16 bit (0x10), ratio: 2000->32000 (16.0 kbit)
      Selected audio codec: [rasipr] afm:realaud (RealAudio Sipro)

      vo: X11 running at 1280x1024 with depth 24 and 32 bpp (":0.0" => local display)

      Opening video decoder: [realvid] RealVideo decoder
      opening shared obj '/usr/lib/win32/drv3.so.6.0'
      Selected video codec: [rv30] vfm:realvid (Linux RealPlayer 8 RV30 decoder)

      Checking audio filter chain for 16000Hz/1ch/16bit -> 16000Hz/2ch/16bit...
      AF_pre: af format: 2 bps, 1 ch, 16000 hz, little endian signed int
      AF_pre: 16000Hz 1ch Signed 16-bit (Little-Endian)
      AO: [oss] 16000Hz 2ch Signed 16-bit (Little-Endian) (2 bps)
      Building audio filter chain for 16000Hz/1ch/16bit -> 16000Hz/2ch/16bit...
      Starting playback...
      VDec: vo config request - 320 x 240 (preferred csp: Planar I420)
      Could not find matching colorspace - retrying with -vf scale...
      Opening video filter: [scale]
      VDec: using Planar I420 as output csp (no 0)
      Movie-Aspect is 1.33:1 - prescaling to correct movie aspect.
      SwScaler: using unscaled Planar YV12 -> BGR 24-bit special converter
      VO: [gl2] 320x240 => 320x240 BGR 24-bit
      [gl2] You have OpenGL >= 1.2 capable drivers, GOOD (16bpp and BGR is ok!)
      [gl2] antialiasing off
      [gl2] bilinear linear
      A: 1.3 V: 1.3 A-V: 0.010 ct: 0.058 21/ 21 15% 7% 0.5% 0 0 18%
      Exiting... (Quit)
    5. Re:mplayer command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It will work only if you have the win32 dlls installed. That's the "/usr/lib/win32/sipr.so.6.0" and "/usr/lib/win32/drv3.so.6.0" in the above output.

      Just view the asf version, works without any extra DLLs.

  31. parasite human by red_forge · · Score: 4, Funny

    err... my Japanese isn't too hot but I think the commentator in the clip refers to the device as the "parasite human".

    Is it just me or is this really sinister?

    They also relate it to robotics research... human robots..

    Also it looks like it should be easy to build into standard audio headphones.... perhaps they already have!.... dun dun DUHHHH!

    1. Re:parasite human by kaellinn18 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is it just me or is this really sinister? I see no evidence that the guy is left-handed.

      --

      --------
      This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    2. Re:parasite human by nosphalot · · Score: 1

      Thank you for making my day. I'm sure no one will bother to mod you up, but damn did that make me laugh.

    3. Re:parasite human by Council · · Score: 1

      . . . informative?

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    4. Re:parasite human by kaellinn18 · · Score: 1

      Sinister is from the Latin, meaning "on the left."

      --

      --------
      This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    5. Re:parasite human by Council · · Score: 1

      I understand the joke; I laughed!

      But that generally indicates that something will be modded 'funny'. No one was seriously suggesting that there were left-handed people in the video, which is why he said "sinister? no one there is left-handed!", why I laughed, why it was modded 'funny', and why I was confused when it was also modded 'informative'. Hence, my question.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  32. Spocks Brain .. by Entropy · · Score: 1

    Ah, so thats how they controlled Spock in that episode :D

    --
    The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
    1. Re:Spocks Brain .. by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      The best part of that episode is they had like 10 buttons, with which they could completely control Spock.
      Walk, turn, blink, grab weird alien woman, etc.
      In 10 buttons.

      If Trek had been done in the 80s they just would have whipped out an NES controller.

    2. Re:Spocks Brain .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the same technique was later used to control Keevan...for a while.

  33. Interesting applications by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

    One can imagine some cool applications for this sort of thing...

    - Computers that help people avoid falling down if they, for whatever reason, have lousy balance or slow reaction. Perhaps it could help older folks for whom falling down can be a serious risk.

    - When the officer says "Walk on this line with one foot in front of the other," I'll say "Yes sir, anything you say, just let me put on my special balance-assist eyeglasses."

    - A game like Dance Dance Revolution might use this to help teach you to get jiggy. And games, or better, IMAX movies, could use it to provide an increased sense of motion.

    - Maybe it could help reduce motion sickness? Sort of like noise-cancellation technology, but for your sense of balance.

    1. Re:Interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can imagine some cool applications for this sort of thing...

      No sir, I did not kill president Kennedy! My wife is rather clumsy with this new remote control we got ...

    2. Re:Interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As someone who suffers from vestibular dysfunction (i.e, I experience daily what these research subjects went through, and my bad spells are more intense), I think I can offer some insight on this:

      - Computers that help people avoid falling down if they, for whatever reason, have lousy balance or slow reaction. Perhaps it could help older folks for whom falling down can be a serious risk.

      Doubtful. You'd have to be able to perfectly compensate for the damage in order to cancel it out. It's like applying an inverse signal to cancel it out, but you have no way of reading what the original (faulty) signal is, or what the correct signal should be. An implant that replaced the vestibular organs would be the only way. Where else could you put the artifical motion sensors?

      Furthermore, balance is determined by three system: the two vestibular organs and your vision. Once vestibular distubances reach a certain level, you start experiencing visual problems. Your eyes start moving uncontrolably to try to compensate for the preceived but not real motion. Try the following:

      Look directly at these words. Keep your eyes focused on this sentance and move your head slowly back and forth. Notice that you do not have to conciously move your eyes to keep them focused on this paragraph; it's completely automatic.

      Vestibular disturbance screws with that process. Your brain gets signals that your head is moving when it's not, and orders the eyes to move to compensate. The result is a seemlingly endless motion in one direction, i.e, the room is spinning. In reality, your eyes are moving back and forth rapidly, but your brain can't deal with the discrepency between what your eye sees and what the vestibular regions are reporting.

      I wrote all that to make an important point. There is a limit to how far this device can go. You can't scale up the signal to create a greater sensation of movement. Push it to far, and you'll experience the visual disruptions I mentioned. I strongly suspect that you can't push it far enough to make it useful for movies, games, etc., where simulating a high level of motion is desirable. You'd just end up making everyone sick.

      Now I'll comment on another poster since lately I can't get slashdot to accept more than one comment for a story:

      If you want to fight it, all you have to do is go limp.

      It can't force you to walk anywhere, it justs makes you tip in one direction or the other, and your automatic walking reflex keeps you under your center of gravity.

      Not true, at least in my experience. Going limp won't do squat except guarantee you fall. Your body will attempt to compensate whether you're walking or standing still, even if doing so throws you out of balance. Remember, it's trying to compensate for faulty data.

      You're also massively underestimating how powerful vestibular disruption can be. At my worst, it didn't just tip me to one side, it threw me against the wall. It took massive effort from a very strong male nurse to hold me up and keep me from doing some real damage to myself.

    3. Re:Interesting applications by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1
      As someone who suffers from vestibular dysfunction (i.e, I experience daily what these research subjects went through, and my bad spells are more intense), I think I can offer some insight on this:


      Sounds like you know a lot more about this stuff than most of the other /.-ers put together. Still, don't let your own circumstances limit your imagination when it comes to considering possibilities.

      - Computers that help people avoid falling down if they, for whatever reason, have lousy balance or slow reaction. Perhaps it could help older folks for whom falling down can be a serious risk.

      Doubtful. You'd have to be able to perfectly compensate for the damage in order to cancel it out. It's like applying an inverse signal to cancel it out, but you have no way of reading what the original (faulty) signal is, or what the correct signal should be.


      I was thinking less of compensating for a damaged vestibular system and more of improving one that mostly works. Imagine a helmet that contains some accelerometers, a little computer, maybe a camera, and a couple of vestibular stimulators. The computer could notice a situation where the user is at risk of falling, perhaps because he or she is already off balance, or perhaps because of upcoming terrain, and activates one stimulator or the other in order to move the user to a more stable configuration.

      I'm sure that's pretty pie-in-the-sky, but it doesn't seem outside the realm of possibility. I'm presupposing that there are people for whom reaction time to balance information from a mostly-working vestibular system is a problem. But that would seem to be exactly the problem that drunk people face, so I'd guess that there might also be people who have similar problems even without alcohol.

      An implant that replaced the vestibular organs would be the only way. Where else could you put the artifical motion sensors?


      Eyeglasses? Helmet? Baseball cap? Star Wars-type levitating robot which follows you around watching you?
    4. Re:Interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      An implant that replaced the vestibular organs would be the only way. Where else could you put the artifical motion sensors?


      Eyeglasses? Helmet? Baseball cap? Star Wars-type levitating robot which follows you around watching you?


      Consider the case where only one side is damaged, in which case you'd have the sensors only on one side. Let's say those sensors are on eyeglasses. That's a good 1-2 inches away from the vestibular organ. You've now shifted the center of your balance system to be somewhere other than where it should be. The artifical sensor will experience different forces than it would if it was inside your head. For example, if you spun around in place, the artifical sensor would experience slightly more angular momentum than the vestibular organ on the other side. Perhaps a computer could compensate for it, I don't know.

      Being "off-center" is something that took a long time for me to deal with. Only one of my ears was damaged, and after the major symptoms lessened, i began noticing that my world was off. It's weird to look at , say running water in a sink and have it sound like it's 4-6 inches to the left. I know that doesn't sound like much, but it really did give me a sense of the world just being "off" a little. It's hard to put into words.
    5. Re:Interesting applications by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      - Computers that help people avoid falling down if they, for whatever reason, have lousy balance or slow reaction. Perhaps it could help older folks for whom falling down can be a serious risk.

      Better yet, now we can finally design those 60' tall mechanical robot-tanks without the pesky requirement to put the operator pretty much exactly at the center of mass. or even in the robot any more. This has exciting possibilities in the field of robots made of lions.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  34. Direct link for RealMedia file by biehl · · Score: 1

    http://images.forbes.com//video/fvn/misc/radiocont rolledhuman.rm Well, the thing didn't show up in my firefox.

  35. Bit off topic by mrs+dogbreath · · Score: 1

    I love Real
    It works
    You can turn off rather easily all those adverts
    Consumes less CPU than FLASH(tm)
    less clumsy UI than WinAmp

    I don't do WMA/V via M$ media player, thats the road to virus hell...

    My HK$6

  36. Disclaimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for Real. I should have included that in my reply.

    1. Re:Disclaimer by BRUTICUS · · Score: 0

      no wonder you're still logged in as an anonymous coward.

  37. Prayer by m00nun1t · · Score: 1

    I now believe that prayers CAN be answered.

  38. WMV Video Mirror/Direct link by coolnicks · · Score: 1

    Video has been mirrored in WMV here:

    http://data.coolnicks.co.uk/Radio_Controlled_Human s.wmv

    1. Re:WMV Video Mirror/Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Video has been mirrored in WMV here:

      http://data.coolnicks.co.uk/Radio_Controlled_Human s.wmv


      Strange, when I play that in MPlayer 1.0pre7 it claims it's DivX ;-)

      Oh well, at least it works.

  39. Better than Previous Efforts. by fgl · · Score: 2, Funny

    If we all recall the remote controlled cockroaches, I guess this is V1.1+

    --
    Go Away! Not for Sale
  40. Nothing new by jjq · · Score: 3, Informative

    See, for instance, http://jp.physoc.org/cgi/content/full/517/3/631 a paper from 1999 with the title "Galvanic vestibular stimulation: new uses for an old tool" Best,

  41. Re:Isn't this what they use to control Dick Cheney by msim · · Score: 5, Funny

    In all honesty i think that is the exception to the rule. In all other cases based in reality that i've seen (dude, manga doesn't count), it is the bush that controls the dick.

    And your lying if you disagree with me.

    --

    Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  42. US perfected it a long time ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Japanese are approaching it from the wrong angle. In the US we already have an advanced remote control system that's working on most of the masses.

    It's called TV

    Seriously.

    1. Re:US perfected it a long time ago. by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Oh, I stopped watching tv years ago. It's amazing how much time you'd have to talk about not watching tv if you stopped watching tv.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:US perfected it a long time ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it. It's such a good and natural feeling to be off the Mass Hypnosis Tube. After not having watched TV in a while and seeing it again recently, it just disgusted me. What utter crap! -- especially the "news"

      But it seems to be quite good at controlling people remotely here in the US.

      It even uses radio waves like the thing in the article :)

    3. Re:US perfected it a long time ago. by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      Just chiming in to agree. Kicked the tube habit a couple years ago. I don't miss it, and like you, I can't believe the garbage programming that people describe to me. I'd like to record them talking about the shows and play it back for them at a later date; it sounds incredibly stupid.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
  43. Real questions before installing Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) Does the player try to take over any other formats than just Real's own?

    2) Does it install an icon to the tasktray?

    3) How many desktop icons does it install?

    4) How many processes does it startup on boot?

    5) Does it integrate the codec into the operating system so that any codec-aware player can use it?

    6) How much data does it send back to Real's servers?

    7) Is the installation process simple and straightforward with a single checkbox to opt-in? Or is it a long series of dialog boxes with hidden checkboxes all over the place?

    8) Does it play videos inline in the browser?

    9) When I close the player (assuming it requires opening the player to watch the media), does it try to stay memory resident?

    10) Is it still Real that makes this? (this is a deal breaker)

    1. Re:Real questions before installing Real by gfody · · Score: 5, Informative

      1) Does the player try to take over any other formats than just Real's own?

      It associates itself with all the "popular" file extensions.

      2) Does it install an icon to the tasktray?

      Like it's 1995, yes.

      3) How many desktop icons does it install?

      just a Upgrade to Real Player Professional shortcut

      4) How many processes does it startup on boot?

      one to reclaim its file associations every 20 seconds. one to keep a tray icon visible at all times. one to check for updates. and one that sends "usage statistics" back to Real. all 4 are added to the startup registry everytime the player is launched.

      5) Does it integrate the codec into the operating system so that any codec-aware player can use it?

      Of course not. That would make it too easy to compare against other codecs.

      6) How much data does it send back to Real's servers?

      Just what your watching, when your watching it and the location of your mouse cursor.

      7) Is the installation process simple and straightforward with a single checkbox to opt-in? Or is it a long series of dialog boxes with hidden checkboxes all over the place?

      It's completely automated with a final messagebox stating that your computer will now be rebooted and a single OK button.

      8) Does it play videos inline in the browser?

      Sometimes.

      9) When I close the player (assuming it requires opening the player to watch the media), does it try to stay memory resident?

      It tries, but then it throws a general protection fault and takes your instance of explorer with it.

      10) Is it still Real that makes this? (this is a deal breaker)

      All development was outsourced to India.. although I hear the new version was outsourced to Russia

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    2. Re:Real questions before installing Real by i+wanted+another+nam · · Score: 1

      Use Real Alternative. Integrates fine with Firefox and Windows Media Player 10. Plays through Firefox using Media Player Classic, which I'm assuming is installed with it, because I didn't put explicitly install it. It played that video fine in Firefox 1.0.6 for me.

      --
      The image is a dream, the beauty is real. Can you see the difference?
    3. Re:Real questions before installing Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget, Real is owned by AOL.

    4. Re:Real questions before installing Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent funny. Mod parent anything other than informative. Error on my part.

      I hope that I am correct in interpreting that post as a joke. If that were genuinely the case, then duly warn Everyone not to install it. That description matches the "worst case" obnoxious software scenario.

      For lack of a Windows box to screw up, I can't verify whether that's truth or a joke. Anyone know for sure?

    5. Re:Real questions before installing Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a joke - it's worse than spyware. Most people stopped making real media files due to the low number of people using it, because of all the junk it installs, and the unique user statistics it phones home to AOL.

  44. Alternative video link by AC-x · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:Alternative video link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rofl

      watch the clip before replying/moddding the parent.

    2. Re:Alternative video link by gfody · · Score: 1

      all I see are giant pixels moving around the screen!

      seriously that video is 256x144 15.00fps.. is it from 1995?!

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    3. Re:Alternative video link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/low/high in the URL

  45. XVid + MPEG-3 repack by SiGiN · · Score: 1

    Here we go. Might be a bit borked on quality to save bandwith, but pretty enough to get picture whats going on. Enjoy.

  46. Control muscles directly. by Saggi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It has been known for some time that electrical currents send to the muscles may cause you to move them. In this way you may control the motion directly, not only by throwing someone off balance, but actually make each individual body part bend.

    There's a (crazy?) artist who has a show, where he do this. Once he danced a synchronized dance, with an industrial robot. Other times he has benne "dancing" to the response times of the internet (lag).

    Now this technology has been explored to see if people can be remotely operated. This could be used to allow people in the field to operate on a patient, remotely controlled by a doctor. Now the doctor is controlling the person in the other end in the same way. Here sensors read the electrical current in his muscles as he moves his hands.

    So far the sensibility to do surgery is not possible, but major movement like moving an arm or closing a hand has been successful.

    Others have already mentioned the possibility of remote sex. Here your partner can control your arms and hands in the same way as you may control his or hers...

    --
    -:) Oh no - not again.
    www.rednebula.com
    1. Re:Control muscles directly. by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      STELARC!!!!! Steeeellllaaaaaarrrrcc!!

    2. Re:Control muscles directly. by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      STELARC! Steeeellllllaaaaaarrrrccc!!



      Dang, why didn't I preview the first time?

    3. Re:Control muscles directly. by Urchlay · · Score: 1
      This could be used to allow people in the field to operate on a patient, remotely controlled by a doctor ... Others have already mentioned the possibility of remote sex...

      See "The Day the Icicle Works Closed", Frederik Pohl, 1959.

      Quick summary: it's about a world where people rent out their bodies to tourists. Unlike the tech from the article, though, they don't sit like a prisoner inside their bodies while they're being remote-controlled. It does mention remote sex, though...

    4. Re:Control muscles directly. by localman · · Score: 1

      In this way you may control the motion directly, not only by throwing someone off balance, but actually make each individual body part bend.

      Yeah, a friend and I used to do this with an electronic barbeque ignition. You could find all sorts of points on the body to stick it and click it, resulting in a muscle twitch. We would compete to see who could get the most movement.

      (We were bored working at an animation company waiting for our Amiga 4000 to render test frames).

      Anyways, while that was cool, this is a bit different: even with perfect electronic control of all the muscles in the body, we couldn't coordinate efficient walking. But by working with just the balance organ you can take advantage of the human's built in walking algorithms, and just direct them. I think that's pretty neat.

      Cheers.

  47. But we see this at the airport all the time... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just watch people as they come down the concourse and try to pass the Cinnabon store... you get exactly the same glazed-eye, vectored walking behavior, and no headset, other than the ubiquitous iPod. Of course, the Japanese approach is carb-free.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  48. Dean Koontz' Demon Seed by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    Demon Seed

    Come on, what kind of geeks are you? :) The world's most powerful computer wants to transfer its intelligence into a human life, so he traps his creator's wife into the ultimate X10 house, and brings in a remotely controllable man to impregnate her. The movie is 30 years old, but Koontz updated the book in 2003 IIRC to bring the concepts and capabilities up2date. Once you read it, you'll feel compelled to change the addressable name of your voice-activated home automation system to "Alfred." Its a really fun book to read.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  49. They haven't installed the hands... by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1

    ...on thier remotely controlled imitation human.

    I want to know how well it handles stairs.

    --
    Stop the world; I need to get off.
  50. Wow by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

    This just puts a whole new spin on that real life pacman game they play in new york

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...or very usefull for controlling prisoners. All you need now is a helmet that explodes if they remove it :/

  51. We already have this... by aluminumcube · · Score: 0

    It's called a television.

    1. Re:We already have this... by imsoclever · · Score: 1

      High five for social commentary!

  52. Mod Parent Down! by Crisses · · Score: 1

    This link has nothing to do with the topic, whatsoever.

    --
    ---- I'm out of your mind!
    1. Re:Mod Parent Down! by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      This link has nothing to do with the topic, whatsoever.

            But it's funny as hell. But I guess you're the one who has been moderating everyone as flamebait, redundant and offtopic eh? Too bad you're out of mod points today...

            Push the tempo, push the tempo... :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Mod Parent Down! by iwan-nl · · Score: 1

      I guess it does, sort of. The music controlled people in the fat boy slim video move in a very similar fasion as the RC controlled girl in TFA's video.

      --
      I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
  53. Re:Real? Read this by tehsoul · · Score: 1

    install real alternative http://www.free-codecs.com/download/Real_Alternati ve.htm it's basically a codec that allows you to play realfiles in whatever (may i suggest media player classic, found here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/guliverkli/ , it's basically a souped up version of the ancient mplayer32. who needs all the shits'n'giggles of that mediaplayer10)

    --
    me and my thinkpad, sittin' in a tree, c-o-d-i-n-g...
  54. Commentary Translation by ickoonite · · Score: 1

    "This research is taking a totally different approach to the more usual studies into robot technologies of the future, which relate to symbiotic relationships with humans. Traditionally, robots have been designed to give practical support to human activities and ..., whereas the "Parasite Human" [as they are calling it] is being posited as a robot which gives lateral support to human activity through the senses."

    It's worth pointing out that it's bloody difficult to translate, given some of the expressions used - my apologies for any inaccuracies.

    iqu :)

  55. XVid + MPEG-3 repack by SiGiN · · Score: 1

    is here. Sorry for double posting, enjoy.

  56. Ooh, a wedding gift for me! by iamatlas · · Score: 1

    I'm getting married to day in 5 hours and 39 minutes. this would make a perfect gift to me for any ofyou out there wanting to chip in for something!

    1. Re:Ooh, a wedding gift for me! by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Please accept my condolenc...er congratulations, and good luck with that. Not that you'll need it or anything...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  57. somehow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be waiting for the hot coffe mod of this technology.

  58. Usage ??? by aepervius · · Score: 1

    And there is any interresting non-evil usage for such a device ?

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  59. Control women with a remote by Chineseyes · · Score: 0

    There wouldn't happen to be a mute button with that? Also can I preprogram the remote for bend over and kneel?

    --
    I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

    --A wise old fart named SC0RN
  60. Dalek Robomen? by dtungsten · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of Dalek Robomen.

  61. I propose a game... by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

    Really, it would be cool. Two people each with a remote control to their opponent's thingy. First one to fall over loses.

  62. Your Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how exactly does a figment of one's imagination save anybody?

    1. Re:Your Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You beg the question.

      Since I can't stand to see people like you persist in error and espouse logically fallacious arguments, I've devised a means by which anti-theists and agnostics can prove once and for all that there is or is not a God:

      Step 1: Put a functioning, loaded gun to your head.
      Step 2: Pull the trigger.
      Step 3: Find out whether or not there's a God.
      Step 4: Profit??? Hmmm, I doubt it.

    2. Re:Your Sig by HiredMan · · Score: 1

      The proof has been done. We're just having some trouble getting the results back...

      But seriously - from a scientific perspective there is no proof for whether or not G/god(s) exist. It is, and will most probably, remain an "unknown". That's where "belief" and "faith" come in.

      May your chosen religion triumph over all those other false ones!

      =tkk

  63. Remote sex by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
    Others have already mentioned the possibility of remote sex. Here your partner can control your arms and hands in the same way as you may control his or hers...
    The mind boggles. Does this mean that, in the future, you could potentially be charged with indecent assault on someone you have not even met? A remote sex service that gives the punter the ability to really control the actions of the model?
  64. Too lame.. THIS is a much better remote control! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Funny
  65. I've had this done to me by orangepeel · · Score: 1

    At least I think I have. It sure would explain a lot.

    I've had an EEG done twice as part of a test for suspected epilepsy. During an EEG, you have a whole bunch of small electrodes glued to your head at very specific points. And then you have someone monitor the activity those electrodes pick up via a computer (or sometimes just dumped to a printer). The output makes it look very much like you're taking a lie detector test (or something seismological).

    Anyway, during the last part of each test, while lying there I suddenly felt as if my head were being pulled down and rotated to one side, for 2, maybe 3, seconds. And then a moment later, I'd be struck with the same feeling only towards the other side. It was very trippy -- almost like someone was reaching inside and pulling my soul one way or the other, and my body was being dragged along with it.

    I'd always suspected that during this part of the test they were actually applying a voltage to some of the electrodes, instead of just recording voltages. If I'm right, and you're wondering what this feels like, here's the best description I can offer:

    You know how when you're holding two magnets near one another (or one magnet and a piece of steel), just at the boundary of when an interaction can be felt? Your fingers feel a very smooth, but very strong pulling sensation. It was just like that -- like a good portion of your head and upper body is being pulled to one side, very smoothly, and very firmly. It's not uncomfortable at all, but if you're doing anything other than quietly lying down, I'm sure it could easily be very disorienting.

    If I'm right, then this a method apparently used to prompt epileptic activity in people prone to such things. What kind of disclaimers are going to be included with a product like this? And, more importantly, if someone doesn't realize the potential effect and that they are prone to it, are they going to be able to include some kind of cut-off if the wearer suddenly experiences an epileptic episode?

    --
    Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
  66. This is NOT remote control by Elbows · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Despite what the summary would imply, this device doesn't take over your body and completely control your movements. I was at SIGGRAPH and tried it out -- it just throws off your sense of balance, making it hard to walk in a straight line. The effect isn't strong enough to make you fall down, and you could probably learn to compensate for it pretty quickly if you tried.

    The effect is good enough for video games, though -- as part of the demo they put you in front of a driving sim, and use the device to simulate the centripetal force when you go around corners. It was pretty cool.

    For most people, it seemed to be painless, but after a little while my skin started to sting where the electrodes where attached.

    1. Re:This is NOT remote control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The effect is good enough for video games, though -- as part of the demo they put you in front of a driving sim, and use the device to simulate the centripetal force when you go around corners.

      What a fantastic idea! That would be awesome. Nice to know that there are still great posts buried in all the Slashdot dross. Kudos. I hope someone actually does this.

    2. Re:This is NOT remote control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also tried the demo at SIGGRAPH. Readers should note, that it is directional, and it doesn't just throw off your balance sense. You can be steered left and right. When people stand still, they can get you to lean left and right.

      The technique they are using is electrical stimulation of the otolith organs in the ear. This technique is well studied, but it is hard to calibrate - the demo had a gain dial. The steered walking and racing game demos worked well for me. However the final demo, a music video, instantly made me slightly nauseous and I had to stop.

    3. Re:This is NOT remote control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For most people, it seemed to be painless, but after a little while my skin started to sting where the electrodes where attached.

      Most people were not attaching them to their ballsacs.

    4. Re:This is NOT remote control by ameline · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was there, and I tried it.

      I have a fair amount of experience throwing off my vestibular canals and ignoring them (pilot, flew aerobatics on the competition circuit for a few years). I tried to walk in a straight line while the device was trying to have me do otherwise. It was *extremely* difficult, but not impossible.

      The feeling of lateral acelleration (where none was actually present) was very convincing.

      I also thought this was one of the cooler things in the emerging technologies section at siggraph.

      --
      Ian Ameline
  67. Prison Applications by InstantCrisis · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the units were smaller and automated, they could prevent prison escapes. Whenever a prisoner leaves a certain area, it would direct him back or force him to stop walking.

    Then the ACLU complains.

  68. Good but not complete by kakashiryo · · Score: 1

    True, you can alter their sense of balance and change their direction, but to get this all to work, you have to have them keep walking all the time forward, right? Not like this technology will be put towards good use for society - I could see it being abused in many wicked and evil ways (no, seriously).

    Without absolutely control over the limbs, this device is pretty much a nausea-inducing and person-'tripping' device, and I hope it stays that way (as cool as it is, but think about the pros and cons).

  69. I won't be impressed... by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    ...until it comes with a MUTE button.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  70. Vicious by idonthack · · Score: 1
    4) How many processes does it startup on boot?

    one to reclaim its file associations every 20 seconds. one to keep a tray icon visible at all times. one to check for updates. and one that sends "usage statistics" back to Real. all 4 are added to the startup registry everytime the player is launched.
    Holy shit man. That's worse than some of the spyware I've had to remove. I hope you can easily uninstall it.
    ---
    What subliminal message?
    Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey
    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    1. Re:Vicious by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      bahahahahahaha!!!!!
      You sir, are funny!

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
  71. A flight sim on your couch by Various+Assortments · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen anyone comment about this possibility.

    Imagine sitting in a comfy chair in front of a big screen, and having this device give you "tilt" sensations co-ordinated with the on-screen action. I would pay for that, once a bit of testing has been done to ensure that there are no long-term effects (like walking drunk all the time!).

    1. Re:A flight sim on your couch by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      Imagine sitting in a comfy chair in front of a big screen, and having this device give you "tilt" sensations co-ordinated with the on-screen action. >

      While I think this is cool and all I doubt the world needs more things that motivate people to spend time on the couch so to speak.

      Perhaps a portable game where you have to fight the system by walking and running?

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    2. Re:A flight sim on your couch by Various+Assortments · · Score: 1

      You're so silly!

  72. Coral Cache Links by idonthack · · Score: 1

    ASF
    RAM
    ---
    What subliminal message?
    Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  73. I was at siggraph, I was remote controlled by anti_analog · · Score: 1

    It's actually quite fun, and quite a promising technology.
    You have a convinient little "volume" control attached to the system so you can choose how strong you want it to be, and if you turn it all the way up, it's very hard to walk straight, and if you don't fight it, you can almost fall over.

    After they would make people look silly in a public demonstration with the remote control, they show different applications by hooking it up to a racing game and a music demo. Being a Gran Turismo fan, being able to feel the cornering force somewhat was quite nice.

    There was one significant problem with the system however. They need a better method for delivering the electrical current than was used in the siggraph demo in which you had to wipe behind your ears with a wet towel. After the moisture evaporated it would start to burn, and my headset was somewhat painful by the end.
    I'm sure that's not too large a hurdle to overcome, especially for home users vs. a public demonstration to hundreds of conference attendies.

    --
    you cannot dodge the quad laser. jumping is useless.
  74. Re:Isn't this what they use to control Dick Cheney by kapital · · Score: 1

    obviously u dont know much about japan.

  75. Obligatory Onion reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Area Man Constantly Mentioning He Doesn't Own a Television

    http://davefaq.com/Opinions/Television/Onion.html

    1. Re:Obligatory Onion reference by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      At least somebody got it. :-)

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  76. I suggested this about a year ago by keraneuology · · Score: 1

    I envisioned this sort of things being used for far far future battlefield applications. For example, a high altitude drone with IR sensors could guide a squad through a jungle to their target by buzzing the right or left side of their suits - much shorter radio transmissions than having to say "now he's moving south". With practice you could train soldiers to do a broken field sprint through a (friendly) minefield with gentle buzzes telling them where to step. With sensitive enough sensors you could (theoretically) also be able to detect an inbound bullet quick enough for a reflexive action to turn a clean headshot into a glancing blow or be told roughly where that inbound shell is going to land. Fighter pilots would also benefit if, in additional to visual, radio and radar they had a suit telling them exactly where the bad guy (and his missiles) were.

    --
    If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
  77. Similar experience by idonthack · · Score: 1

    I had an inner ear infection last year, and I went through that. It's way not cool, you seriously cannot stand in one place (or even sit up!) without falling and it's very nauseating to be still or even lie down with your eyes closed. (I must have thrown up at least six times that morning, and I had dry heaves the rest of the day.) It was also very scary because we didn't know what the hell was going on until I had been diagnosed at the hospital.
    ---
    The only thing I hate more than a hypocrite is a person who hates hypocrites.
    Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  78. Prisoner Control-o-matic of the future ... by fygment · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... wherein after a ruling of guilty, a small device is implanted in your head. It does wonderful things. A GPS connection keeps authorities aware of where you are. Should you deviate from the terms of your sentence, your balance can be immediately impaired making you incapable of coherent movement e.g. escape, resistance, etc.

    Although a recent development, there's still time to get prototypes out to existing cases say, Martha Stewart or suspected terrorists (nothing makes bomb-making trickier than a lack of balance induced long range by powerful shortwave random radio bursts). Of course, this could stimulate a resurgence of the tin-foil hat market.

    What is it with the Japanese and remote control of things? Years ago there was an experiment where they controlled cockroach movement via implants. Frankly, there is something vaguely horrifying about the video despite, or perhaps because of, the girl's giggling.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  79. They've been around for years by Forthan+Red · · Score: 1

    We already have radio-controlled humans. How else do you explain the stupid actions of Rush Limbaugh listeners?

  80. Add GPS tracking to this and.. by Mallaien · · Score: 1

    With GPS tracking Martha Stwewart would not have to complain about that nast ankle braclet she has on, just make her fall over dizzy any time she is out of her cage.

  81. Soccer Parents by rabel · · Score: 0

    Oh man... all the crazed soccer mom's and dad's would love to get remote controls for their children while they're playing soccer. At least if these jerks had remote controls, maybe it would shut them up.

  82. Evolution? ...Upping the Ante from Roaches by fygment · · Score: 1

    Japanese research is showing an interesting or disturbing trend. This article was only about cockroach control. The real goal is now more apparent.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  83. Forbes? by rabel · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it seem odd to anyone else that this information is coming from Forbes?

    I am not your remote-controlled consumer! I am a MAN! *zzzap* must. buy. new car.

  84. Old News... by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    They've been using Humans and rats

  85. OT: Your sig... Re:For those who hate Real by HiredMan · · Score: 1

    Ummm... why would Jesus need to rescue me from your past?

    What the hell did you do to me?

    =tkk

  86. I saw it, would't try it. by ayeco · · Score: 1

    I saw it and kind of refused to try it. I'm not sure there has been thorough testing for long term side effects. Maybe it's safe, maybe it's not.

    I will say, it's pretty amazing to see people vear off to one side while walking. It's really interesting to see more than one person at a time wear these - syncronized stumbling.

  87. Yet one more star trek technology brought to life by iceco2 · · Score: 1

    After Automated doors and Cell-phones
    Star Trek seems to continue to predict
    technological developments,
    this technology was seen in Star Trek
    TOS episode: Spock's Brain:
    http://homepage.mac.com/m5comp/trekbits/trekpics/b rain/
    Where we see Spock being controlled by remote controll
    using a device placed on his head.

      Me.

  88. I recall seeing technology similar to this before. by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    I remember in grade school, our teacher got something that would stimulate muscle movement. I think her son may have been in the medical field, and he was able to get ahold of it. A random classmate was selected, and had terminals of some sort put on her arm. The teacher's son started messing w/ the control box, and her fingers started moving on there own. I was pretty intrigued at the time.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  89. This isn't a new idea for video games. by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about something like this ~8 years ago in a game mazazine. It was supposed to simulate motion by stimulating the inner-ear as I recall. It was going to retail for ~$100, and you can bet I wanted it. I googled (I think hotbot was my main search engine then actually) for a review a few years later later and I found out the effects were barely noticable. Would be great if this newer technology in use is less gimmicky and more functional for immersion *coughrumblepackcough*.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  90. What's wrong with bullwhips? by grikdog · · Score: 1

    Those who see nascent cyborg in the demonstration should reflect that hivemind and hivedive are worlds apart. Anyway, there's lots cheaper options when it comes to herding humans.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  91. Paging Russ Wuertz, Paging Russ Wuertz! by Cryofan · · Score: 0

    google it if you are curious.....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  92. I tried it... by Anm · · Score: 1


    I tried it at SIGGraph last week and here is teh deal. As others mentioned, it only changes your sense of gravity, it does actually control how or where you walk. But with the change in gravity, your stubble in one direction or the other.

    Where this really has an application is in video games and other immersive environments. They had a demo with a large screen race track where you could feel the centripetal force during the turns.

    But the skin contact for the electrical stimulation is not ideal. In the remote control walking and the race demo it was fine for me, although I could feel a tingling behind the ears, even at the lowest level. But the music demo was nearing painful and had no effect on my sense of gravity.

    Anm

  93. CGI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but SIGGRAPH is all about computer generated graphics, so this video surely is CGI.

  94. Drunk stablizer Helmet! by rubberbando · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thats what they need to make using this technology.

    Put a gyroscope (or heck a simple level would probably work) inside a helmet as a balance sensor and have the electric nodes stimulate the opposite side that the drunk tilts toward.

    That way, the drunk can keep his/her balance as they walk home. :P

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  95. I will never again instal REAL, EVER by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is nothing I trust about this company. Nothing. I will never support them. Ever.

    Even being a computer newb I never trusted the company or the player and managed for 5 years to never instal or watch a REAL video. Quite happily. Then in 2000 I was bored, REALLY BORED. And thought i'd give it a shot to watch a video. After watching it Real associated itself with every file extension possible. It loaded everytime I restarted the computer. The player I did instal sucked ass and you had no control of the stopping or starting of it. I dont even remember but it just felt like I had installed a virus on my machine.

    And thats why I have no desire at all to give a shit about this video. Despite my overwhelming interest in the subject.

    Slashot being the flagship for the geek community should realize this and never link to anything that is REAL.

  96. What was that movie.. by nevdullc · · Score: 1

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070544/Planète sauvage, La (1973)
    I for one would be pleased to be your new galvanic vestibular stimulation overlord.
    This is terrifying and amazing at the same time.
    Could you imagine the military applications, like radio controlled super troop swarms controlled by a team of users playing realtime video games with the controllee, or just the obedience collars for dangerous prisoners, mental patients or even good citizens.
    Big brother could build in RFID as well as GPS locating chips into them and have every citizen wear one for their own safety and security...
    -- um..
    /nev/dull/c

    --
    Cthulhu Saves -- in case He's hungry later.
  97. I'm Excited... by loyukfai · · Score: 1

    Together with this, we're gonna rule the galaxy, in the form of borgs! Resistence is futile!

  98. It's true, and they're called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    REPUBLICANS

  99. A long ways from being perfect by cheier · · Score: 1

    I got to try this device while at SIGGRAPH. While it actually does work, and feels wierd, at the moment, it does require a large aparatus to wear, and in most people (according to the notes I saw at the end survey), it is uncomfortable. Then again, you try feeling comfortable with electrical pulses constantly prickling behind your ear.

  100. 4 Insightful not 5 Funny? by DumbSwede · · Score: 1
    Some moderators need to learn to recognize a Joke.
    No I'm not new here, sigh....

    P.S. wickedly Funny though.

  101. At last,... by pontifier · · Score: 1

    ... my Syndicate can begin to take over the world!!

    --
    -John Fenley
    1. Re:At last,... by pontifier · · Score: 1

      My first attempt at remote control people involved a shirt that would relay comands to the users chest. the second attempt involved a welding helmet with a bit that the user held in their mouth like a horse. with the bit, steering didn't work too well and this looks like it can steer fairly well.

      --
      -John Fenley
  102. Very useful technology ... by hritcu · · Score: 1

    ... for automatically equilibrating drunk people.

    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  103. I tried it by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wasn't impressed. It does give a vague impression of being off balance but it didn't have a very strong effect and it wasn't very directional. When I tried their racing game demo I felt nothing that was in any way coordinated with what was happening in the game. It did give me a vague feeling of motion sickness which continued after I had removed the device. The electrodes also felt unpleasant though the other people I tried it with didn't feel this.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  104. Large deviations?? by startleman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a Ph.D. student at the University of British Columbia, in Vancouver, Canada. I actually do research using GVS. Here's links to some of our research (Pubmed). GVS 1,
    GVS 2
    GVS 3
    (disclosure: I am Carlsen on the papers :)). What troubles me is that the magnitude of the deviations is so large from the video. We showed that when walking in an open environment (e.g. like in the video), deviations due to GVS (with eyes open) is VERY small (~10 cm over a 3m distance). Even with eyes closed, the magnitude of the deviation was only 30 cm for 3m forward travel. GVS amplitude was set at 3x the threshold required to induce sway while standing (~1.5 mA) and some subjects reported that this could get painful. My main beef with this is that it appears from the video that the researchers were exaggerating the effect for the cameras. This is not to say that GVS does not have useful commercial applications, but this notion of "remote controlled humans" is an exaggeration. We have tried hooking up GVS to a flight simulator and got mixed feelings from subjects, but I believe that if tweaked correctly, this could be an area of application. However, because people react differently to different levels of stimulation, the problem of individual differences, and determining a threshold level might be tricky (also too high of a current can fry your brain, so kids, don't try this at home)!!

  105. Nope, balance Denhancer !.. by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I happen to know and use this muscle in another application (sort of)...

    In Judo, when you grab the opponent collar, this is where you put the bone on the back of your thumb to induce (more or less forcibly) a reflexive movement in the direction you wish (on beginners) or a conscient counter-pressure from intermediate fighters , so as to then accentuate the move and throw him/her/it somewhere on his back.

    You get an instinctive reaction to avoid pressure on this point, so your body, in trying to protect you, is actually betraying you...

    Try it with friends, for fun, don't try it on your sensei, he's gonna make you fly 8p

    There are lots of pressure point used in acupuncture, massages and martial arts that have very interesting effects - healing, relaxative, dolorous or just plain deadly.

    Google a bit, its quite educative 8)

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  106. Researcher Told Me It Just Uses D.C. Current by toonerh · · Score: 1

    I saw it at SIGGRAPH and asked one of the researchers what kind of electrical signal was used. He said it was simply a low current D.C. signal between two electrodes behind the ear. The apparratus was built into a pair of hollowed earphones that contained a radio receiver and battery. The controller looked like a stock RC one with a little joy stick to move people left or right.

    I didn't ask if the polarity of the D.C. current matters (+ above -, or vice versa), but I think it just stimulates one ear or the other (or neither).

  107. Resistance is futile... by nazgul000 · · Score: 1

    ... you will be assimilated. Yes, this is creepy.

  108. Re:Isn't this what they use to control Dick Cheney by Rellik66 · · Score: 1

    ...it is the bush that controls the dick.

    Wait a sec, was that a political statement or a sexual statement?

    --

    Too many zeros, not enough ones

  109. more on topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This video is a little more on topic:

    http://traktor.com/musicvideos/low/Plug%20It%20inl ow.mov

  110. What's even spookier... by Hosiah · · Score: 1
    Is that this story is running at the same time as the Verichip implant one on /.

    Don't tell me - lemme guess. Who's been awarded the contract for writing the software that controls the Verichips and the remote-control devices? Microsoft, I suppose? So THAT's how they'll get people to buy Vista!

  111. Since noone else is doing it... by slappyjack · · Score: 1

    --obligatory bad joke post--

    I for one welcome our remote controlling overlords...

    In Soviet Russia, Humans remotely controll YOU

    [ Insert ANY George W Bush/Dick Cheney joke here ]

    In South Korea, only old people use remote controlls.

    Roses are Red
    Voilets are Blus
    All my movements
    Are controlled by you

    karma. feh.

  112. I tried it; I liked it. by CityZen · · Score: 1

    I just got back from Siggraph, and I had a chance to try the system out. Indeed it did seem to be one of the most popular things to check out at Siggraph. I suppose it helped that as soon as people experienced it, they often busted out laughing.

    Anyway, the experience consisted of putting on these modified headphones (speakers were removed; electrodes were added behind the ears), wearing the remote-control pack, and waiting for someone to twist the joystick. When that happened, it felt like the floor was being tilted under you, and you wanted to lean to one side or another (depending upon the joystick action).

    With the electrode placement as is, it only controls your left-right sense of balance. I asked and they suggested that a differently-placed pair of electrodes could control forward-back, but it's not as effective.

    The electrodes tingle a bit when the current is applied. A fried who tried it found this uncomfortable. Someone else said it produced a strange taste in their mouth.

    Another demo showed you a video of a racing game, and the electrode current was synchronized to the left and right turns, making you "fall" towards the outside of the turns. Kind of interesting, but the effect was not really powerful enough as the car movement would have you believe.

    The final demo just played music and synchronized the electrode current to the music beat, making you move back and forth with the music. This one really just had me leaning my head mostly.

    As the demoer pointed out, the sensation is only suggestive, not controlling. It is possible to ignore it if you concentrate. But it does feel very "natural" (like I said, it feels like the floor is being tilted under you).

    It's a cool gadget. Main issue now is that there have been no long-term studies of applying this kind of electrical stimulation. Like everything else, I can't help but think that it's somehow not good for you in excess.

  113. Wonderful Invention by Brian4120 · · Score: 1

    Great, now we have the power to make people fall down with out any feet, objects, or drugs. The times we live in...

  114. In Soviet Russia... by ravind · · Score: 1

    ...oh forget it.

  115. The real question is... by rdwald · · Score: 1

    ...does it still work if you're wearing a tin foil hat?

  116. Non-invasive replacement for a cochlear implant? by adamdeprince · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you wiggle it around a bit you can get it to stimulate the inner ear's other parts too? Perhaps a non-invasive alternative to a cochlear implant?

  117. Can I Slap One Of These On Any Woman? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    Maybe I could get a date!

    "video of a remotely controlled woman"

    Would that be Katherine Harris, by any chance? Remotely controlled from Republican National Committee headquarters?

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  118. Of course it's on forbes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A crass capitalist magazine talking about the newest way to control people. Yup, snafu.

  119. kicking the habit by cbr2702 · · Score: 1

    Just gotta kick the Slashdot habit now.

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
  120. More Like Remote Controlled Inebriation by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    More Like Remote Controlled Inebriation :-)

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams