Third option: Your employer can simply decide not to be your employer (that is, not employ you, or fire you if you are already employed) unless you accept your payment in legal tender. And every court in the world would approve that.
Indeed, the best way to get rich with cryptocurrency is to create your own version, mine an initial amount for yourself, get enough people to join, and then sell yours before the bubble bursts.;-)
How should we know if you have been looking for one?
Here's a hint for you: A question mark marks a sentence as question (therefore the name "question mark"). If it is not meant as a question, don't put a question mark at the end.
I know it's fun to bitch about corporate power, but corporations won't be shooting a pregnant wife in her own house (ruby ridge),
If there were not a government making sure that such an action would be punished, I'd not be sure about that. After all, illegal corporations (also known as organized crime) are known to have no qualms to do such things.
putting you in a cage for taking pictures,
They don't need to because they know they can just call a government agency to do it for them. Otherwise, see my previous point.
or forcibly taking everything you own because they decided they have the power.
Oh, they do so as much as they can (see statuatory copyright infringement). Also, see my first point.
Yes, sometimes documents are required in DOC format only. But fortunately in my experience that's rare (YMMV, of course). Quite often PDF is accepted as well.
It was more frequent in the past. That it no longer is probably is to a good part due to those people who just can't stop educating others about the problems of demanding (or passing around) DOC files.
Otherwise you're just manufacturing stress and effort when there doesn't need to be any.
Those people who demand DOC for no good reason are those who create unnecessary stress and effort where there does not need to be any. It's only fair if they get some of that back.
It's not as if reading PDFs would require installation of any non-widespread or expensive software, or would take a lot of effort in any other way.
So if it is named "Financial Crimes Enforcement Network", then obviously its aim is to enforce financial crimes. So, not only does it not fight crime, nor does it simply ignore crime, it isn't even just promoting crime, no, it enforces crime!:-)
I guess the part of star trek which fascinated them most was the captain asking: "Computer, where's Riker?" and getting an accurate response immediately...
Maybe his new book would have been about intelligence agencies threatening science fiction authors who come too close to reality. The NSA read his manuscript from his computer and thought: "Great idea, let's test it on him."
Repeated iteration of functions certainly is relevant for the des(des(des())) situation mentioned in the title and the first paragraph of raymorris' post. I didn't question that part. I did question the part where he claimed that layering different types of encryption on top of each other makes the encrytion as weak as the weakest one. It is true for hashes (which I explicitly acknowledged), but I strongly doubt that I have to fear that data I'm sending through an SSH link is highly insecure just because I've run a rot13 on it before sending.
You calculated hashes. I said for hashes it is clear.
But the statement for encryption basically states that if I encrypt my text with rot13 (weak encryption) and then send it through ssh (thus applying strong encryption on top of the weak rot13), the ssh data stream (which is now encrypted with two different algorithms) would be no harder to crack than the weaker of the two encryptions (which clearly is rot13). That is what I don't buy.
Don't you understand? There's a hologram which contains everything about the world. Including how to cure cancer. And those scientists are just starting to understand how to read it.
Slashdot Mirror
SETICoin? However that would collapse the very moment extraterrestrial life is found. :-)
Anyopne speculating with them, I guess. And anyone using it as a payment system.
That matters to miners. To others it only matters very little.
Third option: Your employer can simply decide not to be your employer (that is, not employ you, or fire you if you are already employed) unless you accept your payment in legal tender. And every court in the world would approve that.
Indeed, the best way to get rich with cryptocurrency is to create your own version, mine an initial amount for yourself, get enough people to join, and then sell yours before the bubble bursts. ;-)
A plane is a bus with wings.
Not every plane is an Airbus. ;-)
The news is that North Korea has an internet from which it can erase that information.
How should we know if you have been looking for one?
Here's a hint for you: A question mark marks a sentence as question (therefore the name "question mark"). If it is not meant as a question, don't put a question mark at the end.
If there were not a government making sure that such an action would be punished, I'd not be sure about that. After all, illegal corporations (also known as organized crime) are known to have no qualms to do such things.
They don't need to because they know they can just call a government agency to do it for them. Otherwise, see my previous point.
Oh, they do so as much as they can (see statuatory copyright infringement). Also, see my first point.
Yes, sometimes documents are required in DOC format only. But fortunately in my experience that's rare (YMMV, of course). Quite often PDF is accepted as well.
It was more frequent in the past. That it no longer is probably is to a good part due to those people who just can't stop educating others about the problems of demanding (or passing around) DOC files.
Those people who demand DOC for no good reason are those who create unnecessary stress and effort where there does not need to be any. It's only fair if they get some of that back.
It's not as if reading PDFs would require installation of any non-widespread or expensive software, or would take a lot of effort in any other way.
So if it is named "Financial Crimes Enforcement Network", then obviously its aim is to enforce financial crimes. So, not only does it not fight crime, nor does it simply ignore crime, it isn't even just promoting crime, no, it enforces crime! :-)
Windows Phone, and the Xbox operating system. ;-)
ODF, like DOC/DOCX is a format for editable documents. I consider neither appropriate for finished documents. Use PDF (ideally, PDF/A) for that.
Well, that was due to a misunderstanding. They delivered pounds dynamite instead of pounds sterling.
Idiot.
That's an alternative I've not yet encountered. Could you tell something about its features? Is it free? And where do you get it?
I guess the part of star trek which fascinated them most was the captain asking: "Computer, where's Riker?" and getting an accurate response immediately ...
Maybe his new book would have been about intelligence agencies threatening science fiction authors who come too close to reality. The NSA read his manuscript from his computer and thought: "Great idea, let's test it on him."
Maybe that's why wireless power is pushed these days ...
With this sentence you've given away the fake. Of course the NSA already knows his notes in detail. Better than he himself, in fact.
Repeated iteration of functions certainly is relevant for the des(des(des())) situation mentioned in the title and the first paragraph of raymorris' post. I didn't question that part. I did question the part where he claimed that layering different types of encryption on top of each other makes the encrytion as weak as the weakest one. It is true for hashes (which I explicitly acknowledged), but I strongly doubt that I have to fear that data I'm sending through an SSH link is highly insecure just because I've run a rot13 on it before sending.
You calculated hashes. I said for hashes it is clear.
But the statement for encryption basically states that if I encrypt my text with rot13 (weak encryption) and then send it through ssh (thus applying strong encryption on top of the weak rot13), the ssh data stream (which is now encrypted with two different algorithms) would be no harder to crack than the weaker of the two encryptions (which clearly is rot13). That is what I don't buy.
No. But they can be programmed in Logo.
I think it phones to this place. However some developers don't trust that random number generator and instead opt for this implementation.
Sorry, but on this system, we don't allow self-modifying code.
No, because the projection is on the inside of the hollow earth. ;-)
Don't you understand? There's a hologram which contains everything about the world. Including how to cure cancer. And those scientists are just starting to understand how to read it.