Slashdot Mirror


Sci-fi Author Charles Stross Cancels Trilogy: the NSA Is Already Doing It

doom writes "Charles Stross has announced that there won't be a third book in the Halting State trilogy because reality (in a manner of speaking) has caught up to him too fast The last straw was apparently the news that the NSA planted spies in networked games like WoW. Stross comments: 'At this point, I'm clutching my head. Halting State wasn't intended to be predictive when I started writing it in 2006. Trouble is, about the only parts that haven't happened yet are Scottish Independence and the use of actual quantum computers for cracking public key encryption (and there's a big fat question mark over the latter-- what else are the NSA up to?).'"

208 comments

  1. Scottish Independance by LaminatorX · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Scotts are to have a referendum on independance next year, as far as that goes.

    1. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      and there's a big fat question mark over the latter

      those of us who are plus-sized more to love find that discription offensive

      don't even get me started on how the hispanic community feels about socalled "spic and span"

    2. Re:Scottish Independance by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Scotts are to have a referendum on independance next year, as far as that goes.

      With Madrid shaking its angry little fist at Scotland, saying the can't be admitted to the EU (which is an indirect way to dissuade Catalonia from pursuing independence as well.)

      Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mentioned in the article as far as that goes.
      In fact its one of two votes (other is UK leaving EU) that he says affected the decision to not release a third book.

      I therefore conclude that there is simply no point in my starting to write a near-future politically astute crime thriller set in Scotland before I know the outcome of those votes

      Summary is misleading, but its really not unreasonable to actually read the article. This one is only about a half dozen paragraphs.

    4. Re:Scottish Independance by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      ... and I've got my immigration application signed and ready to send out*, just in case the independence movement actually succeeds :)

      *Emigrating to Scotland, not from.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given Charlie Stross live in Scotland I think he may know that.

    6. Re:Scottish Independance by meerling · · Score: 2

      Please stop looking for insults where none exist.

    7. Re: Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was sarcastic.

    8. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmmm.....

      You might like to look beyond the "jam tomorrow" promises in the SNP "white paper" on the benefits of Independence.

    9. Re:Scottish Independance by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, if Europe doesn't want Scotland. We could use a 51st state. Especially one with such great scotch.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    10. Re:Scottish Independance by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      and there's a big fat question mark over the latter

      those of us who are plus-sized more to love find that discription offensive

      Lighten up, Francis. There's just more to love about the question mark.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    11. Re:Scottish Independance by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but what would we do for the 52nd and 53rd states? We need 53, after all, the US is "One nation, indivisible."

      --
      Not a sentence!
    12. Re:Scottish Independance by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what would we do for the 52nd and 53rd states? We need 53, after all, the US is "One nation, indivisible."

      Puerto Rico and Jefferson (The XX (Double Cross) State)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    13. Re:Scottish Independance by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... and I've got my immigration application signed and ready to send out*, just in case the independence movement actually succeeds :)

      *Emigrating to Scotland, not from.

      Sorry, but there can be only one Highlander.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    14. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could anyone who voted this as Funny explain why?

    15. Re:Scottish Independance by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      We need 53, after all, the US is "One nation, indivisible."

      One nation, indivisible, but with primacy through gerrymandering for all.

    16. Re:Scottish Independance by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Well, if Europe doesn't want Scotland. We could use a 51st state. Especially one with such great scotch.

      Do they have lots of young healthy people who can't figure out that a small fine is less than a large premium?

      Then we definitely need to welcome them into the US, right now!

    17. Re:Scottish Independance by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Actually, Puerto Rico would land itself as the 51st state if anything. Seriously.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    18. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop looking for insults where none exist.

      What if you never actually get insulted? You have to find your insults where you look for them.

    19. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then stop scarfing down fast food and other junk, get some exercise, and stop being fat.

      It's genetic you insensitive clod. I'm already down to a single meal every one of two daze, ... sorry dave. And you can scarf down as much food as feels good dave.

    20. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      saying the can't be admitted to the EU

      That's not a bug, it's a feature.

    21. Re: Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you never get insulted - just get married. Solved that problem for me.

    22. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a Norwegian, we could use a 2nd one. That solves the EU problem as well.

    23. Re:Scottish Independance by Plammox · · Score: 1

      Sorry, they're taken. They want to be a Nordic country.

    24. Re:Scottish Independance by mjwx · · Score: 1

      ... and I've got my immigration application signed and ready to send out*, just in case the independence movement actually succeeds :)

      *Emigrating to Scotland, not from.

      I can see the immigration applications.

      Question 8:
      How many bairns have ye got:
      Lads(_) Lasses(_)

      Question 35:
      Are ye a big jessie: Aye(_) go to question 35b Noo (_)

      Question 35b
      Can ye no play fooootbul very well: Aye(_) go to question 35c Noo (_)

      Question 36c
      Ach, what the fook is wrong with ye, ye big fookin jessie: _____________________

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    25. Re:Scottish Independance by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I might have to as well. I don't want to leave the EU but I think most of my fellow UK subjects do. Well, the papers tell them they do. It's a scary thought.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re:Scottish Independance by Sique · · Score: 1

      Like in the 9th century, when Normans ruled the Orkneys, Hebrids, the Isle of Man and Galloway?

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    27. Re:Scottish Independance by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Given the northward flow of tax money in the UK currently, Scottish Independence would mean that the government of the rest of the UK could immediately end all of the austerity cuts. Meanwhile, the Scottish government would be trying to get comparable handouts from the EU (likely vetoed by Spain so that Catalan independence doesn't get any inspiration), or watching the economy tank. All of the benefits that Scotland gains from large proportions of the military being stationed there in peacetime would evaporate, as would the public sector contracts that have been helping to bootstrap the Scottish IT industry over the last few years.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    28. Re:Scottish Independance by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

      Charlie knows full well that there's a referendum soon, he lives in Edinburgh.

    29. Re:Scottish Independance by artistu1991 · · Score: 1

      :))).....interesting...

    30. Re:Scottish Independance by _Spirit · · Score: 1

      You are aware that Scotland will claim a significant portion of the UK's natural resources right? Scots have been arguing that money (oil and LNG) is flowing the other way....

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

    31. Re:Scottish Independance by BenfromMO · · Score: 1

      We already have 57 states don't we? At least that is what our intelligent president believes, so it must be true since that man is an absolute genius.

    32. Re:Scottish Independance by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I'm fat, clean, and Mexican. I have a big fat question mark about the phrase spic and span.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Scottish Independance by jalopezp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Catalonia has its referendum before Scotland does. After Catalonia is independent, Madrid will have a lot less to say on Scottish EU membership. Also, and more importantly, maybe finally UEFA will rethink it's stupid 'one country one league' rule.

    34. Re:Scottish Independance by jalopezp · · Score: 2

      What happened to question 35c and to calling it fitba'?

    35. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Puerto Rico and Guam. People always forget about Guam.

    36. Re:Scottish Independance by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but there can be only one Highlander.

      Keep your head.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    37. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm white and I have a big fat question about a place called the cracker barrel.

    38. Re:Scottish Independance by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Nice. As a Norwiegian American, I'm fine with that too.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    39. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if they have any nitwits who don't know that the small fine increases annually.

    40. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't even get me started on how the hispanic community feels about socalled "spic and span"

      My anscestry is Irish. Cal me a mick? Sure, no problem. Tell a joke about Irish drunkenness? Sure, I love ethnic jokes.

      You need to lighten your fat ass up a bit, Mary.

    41. Re:Scottish Independance by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If they'd done it in the '80s, that would have been a good idea, however even if they did get the North Sea reserves, they're almost gone now, so it's not a good long-term strategy.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    42. Re:Scottish Independance by Optali · · Score: 1

      Ahh! Your phrase is insulting to the blind making them remember that they cannot look for insults. !!!

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    43. Re:Scottish Independance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This big question mark is my dick ready to crack your "barrel"

    44. Re:Scottish Independance by Optali · · Score: 1

      What's a "Norwegian American"? A black guy from Idaho with half his family Mexican, an Indian grandmother, a
      Texan dad and, an mom from Oklahoma and a granddad who was a buffalo from the prairies and who's only known relation to Norway is that you can correctly write N and W with a pen?

      Cool then I'm a Maori Dutch because I read about the Maori in the Wikipedia. Let's make a Haka!!!

      XD

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    45. Re:Scottish Independance by Optali · · Score: 1

      We can incorporate them as a new province of the Netherlands. We could use some of their hills down here, seriously.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    46. Re:Scottish Independance by Optali · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the Catalans don't have scotch... and none of the extremely attractive traditions of the Scottish, like the one that consists in firing a canon shot every hour from the fortress of Edinburgh, not to speak about going commando with the kilt!!!

      In Catalonia they only have cultural events such as massacring bulls with chainsaws or biting goats to death. While it certainly has it's fun it cannot be compared with the elation of running through the highlands swaying your slong in the fresh! And don't forget the canon shots!!

       

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    47. Re:Scottish Independance by Optali · · Score: 1

      No eh?
      You will see, when they send the Loch Ness monster to sink your tankers!

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    48. Re:Scottish Independance by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Well, if Europe doesn't want Scotland. We could use a 51st state.

      That is far and away the best argument against Independence that I've heard yet.

      Yes, I do get a vote. Unlike you.

      Bloody Septics ; thinking they rule the world.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    49. Re:Scottish Independance by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I don't want to leave the EU but I think most of my fellow UK subjects do. Well, the papers tell them they do.

      The papers are only telling people to leave the UK if they're owned by the Australian megalomaniac. Which is, sadly, the majority of the press.

      It's a scary thought.

      Yeah - we've only barely got settled into the new house, and I really don't need the hassle of moving again. Changing languages isn't that much of an issue, but I really don't want to go through the hassle of decorating again. But leaving Europe simply is not on the agenda.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    50. Re:Scottish Independance by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      If they'd done it in the '80s, that would have been a good idea, however even if they did get the North Sea reserves, they're almost gone now,

      Not true. We're past Peak Oil and have been for approaching a decade. But there is still a long tail of smaller deposits in production. I certainly expect to be employed in searching for the stuff for the rest of my working life - into my 70s at least. I was having a swalley a couple of nights ago with a friend who is deck crew on one of the big production platforms, where they're starting a re-building programme that will cost a couple of billion and keep the installation in work for at least another 20 years.

      so it's not a good long-term strategy.

      It's not a good long term strategy, but not for that reason. The logic that says Scotland can and should take the revenues from the hydrocarbon reserves and share them amongst 5 million instead of 60 million works just as well for the Shetlanders to take around half of the hydrocarbon deposits and share it amongst 23-odd thousand. Or they could just hook up with the Noggins - plenty of shared history there.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    51. Re:Scottish Independance by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Thanks to the English, that's about all that's left.

  2. Scotland by Threni · · Score: 4, Funny

    Still, us English folk can only hope that a future which consists of the Scots living quietly amongst themselves and us not having to put up with that awful dirge Auld Lang Syne every bloody New Year's Eve isn't the stuff of science fiction...

    1. Re:Scotland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Still, us English folk can only hope that a future which consists of the Scots living quietly amongst themselves and us not having to put up with that awful dirge Auld Lang Syne every bloody New Year's Eve isn't the stuff of science fiction...

      Something seems odd about that line.

      Scots living quietly amongst themselves

      Ah, right, that bit. What possibly makes you think Scots would (or could) ever be quiet?

    2. Re:Scotland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I'm FROM Scotland, how do you think I feel? I need to deal with that song IN REAL LIFE.

    3. Re:Scotland by Aboroth · · Score: 1

      Huh? Oh you mean that song where everyone sings "An old man's eye, my dear, an old man's eye."

    4. Re:Scotland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're not doing it right, you're supposed to be very drunk, standing in a big circle linked arms, and running in and out of the middle. It's not supposed to go that slow either.

    5. Re:Scotland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you remember singing that song, you're not doing it right.

    6. Re:Scotland by jalopezp · · Score: 1

      And why should they stay amongst themselves? It's an old Scottish tradition to live in England. Even in the (extremely unlikely) case where Scotland does not join the EU, it could still bee in the EEA through EFTA and still keep the free movement of people.

    7. Re:Scotland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he could just be a shit writer. Reality surpasses SF lots of times. Good writers make the story work anyway.

    8. Re:Scotland by doom · · Score: 1

      Or he could just be a shit writer

      And you could be a weak troll, but thanks anyway.

      You could try reading some of his stuff if you're interested. My pick is "Accelerando".

  3. In America... by Anarchy24 · · Score: 0

    TV watch you.

    1. Re:In America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Physical power switches, son, physical power switches....

    2. Re:In America... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's why wireless power is pushed these days ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  4. Re:Wow! by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Another book becoming real!

    I think we can safely say this has advanced to the stage of yet another*.

    * it's a technical term.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  5. Bitcoin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Who needs quantum computers to hack public keys.
    All those Bitcoin mining computers are actually secretly hacking encryption keys for the NSA.

  6. Probably writer's block by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's probably just writer's block. Intelligence agency interest in on-line games was in the news back around 2006-2008, just like the warrantless wiretapping controversy. If he was going to abandon it for the stated reason I would expect he would have done it then. Besides, this sort of thing hasn't really stopped other writers from creating interesting stories.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Probably writer's block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      With Bush, it was still Science Fiction. With Obama, it has become Science Fact.

    2. Re:Probably writer's block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? None of the programs being disclosed are _new_. In fact, some of the most egregious only existed under Bush (although they undoubtedly continue under Obama, but technically under a different program umbrella).

    3. Re:Probably writer's block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the actual blog post, there's a PS at the end that some of the ideas are going into the trilogy he is writing now and furthermore that he will write a third police procedural: just that current events with the NSA have utterly broken his future history so he'll have to scrap it and make a new one from scratch that incorporates the recent NSA revelations.

    4. Re:Probably writer's block by Camembert · · Score: 1

      So far in his prolific career, Stross has never been short of ideas. Writer's Block is highly unlikely. As he posts in the blog, likely he will write a book with the recent NSA revelations as the baseline, and extrapolate from there.

    5. Re:Probably writer's block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what he means. The difference is that, post-Snowden, nobody is making snarky remarks about tinfoil hats anymore. As soon as you accuse someone of being a paranoid loon about something, a document is produced that proves them right.

    6. Re:Probably writer's block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably just writer's block.

      That's a cheap personal attack. Don't do those, please.

  7. Little Brother by nitzmahone · · Score: 0

    Yawn. MMO spies figured prominently in Cory Doctorow's "Little Brother" in 2008.

    1. Re:Little Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're plugging Doctorow on this site? Lemme get my popcorn....

  8. See what you have done, NSA ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear NSA,

    You not only cost us our privacy, the privacy that we treasure so much.

    Now you cost us a good book !

    What else are you going to cost us, NSA ??

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:See what you have done, NSA ? by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Mr. Stross,

      It is with great regret that we have learned of the discontinuation of your how-to manual, Halting State.

      We have unfortunately not been able to encourage Scotland to secede from the United Kingdom in a timely manner, however, we assure you that our state of Quantum Computing has reached appropriate levels.

      We have been eagerly awaiting your third instalment. Considering your decision to discontinue your series, we would appreciate any notes you have to be emailed. Anywhere will be fine.

      Yours sincerely,

      Manne I. Black
      NSA

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:See what you have done, NSA ? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Considering your decision to discontinue your series, we would appreciate any notes you have to be emailed.

      With this sentence you've given away the fake. Of course the NSA already knows his notes in detail. Better than he himself, in fact.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:See what you have done, NSA ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With this sentence you've given away the fake.

      C'mon that sentence with its postcedent: "Anywhere will be fine" is the payload.

      Email it anywhere ... too good!

    4. Re:See what you have done, NSA ? by flyneye · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear Batman,

                Since I don't believe in Santa Claus, could you take a break from patrolling Gotham to dismantle the evil NSA and put those responsible for it in Arkham Asylum?
      I'm convinced the Penguin is behind it, due to the scope, peril and nuisance involved. Lotta tuxedos in the D.C. and burbs area. The proliferation of clowns in the White House/Capitol Hill/Lincoln Memorial areas would suggest that the Joker has been masquerading as President for years now. Could you rid us of these fiends and their henchmen?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    5. Re:See what you have done, NSA ? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Now you cost us a good book !

      Wait, I thought TFA was about Charles Stross?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  9. Already use quantum computers to crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mostly just use the built-in cryptography backdoors, however.

  10. Pick your favourite outcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would we rather see...

    - A Neal Stephenson world
    - A George Orwell world
    - A Cory Doctorow world
    - A Aldous Huxley world
    - Name your world...

    1. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by cusco · · Score: 2

      CJ Cherryh's Foreigner world

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    2. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by jimshatt · · Score: 2

      A Ron Jeremy world!

    3. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're fucked!

    4. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Anne McCaffrey.

      I'd happily live on Pern, Thread and all.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by HeckRuler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So...
      Corporocracy
      Totalitarian states in constant war
      A post-scarcity utopia that hinges on karma
      A utopia where the people are bribed into apathy/foolishness

      I'd go with Doctorow.

    6. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^This. Totally this. Cory Doctorow understands technology better than almost anyone else writing today.

    7. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by davecb · · Score: 1

      Yes! I want to file for a change of government tomorrow (:-))
      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    8. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by Esteanil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Definitively a Iain M. Banks world (The Culture)

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    9. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

      At least in the cosy parts. Certainly you wouldn't want to live in a Neal Asher World (The Owner Trilogy)

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
    10. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      How about this: The old governments do not change, instead the corporations incite violence by proxy. Countries conquering countries is over, they're "freed" instead. The country borders and names left the same, but the corporations fight on economic fronts to institute their economic systems and siphon up as much wealth and work from the lower and middle classes as possible in a shadow war between the people of the world and Marxist Corpratism.

      Welcome to the real world circa 1970-201X

      As always, reality is better and stranger than fiction.

    11. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by dbIII · · Score: 2

      I'll vote for a "Letters to Playboy" world.

    12. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by storkus · · Score: 1

      Umm...the !Doctorow options (1,2,4) are not mutually exclusive; in fact, I'm convinced we have been in a Corporatocracy for a while, which controls us through the "utopia where the people are bribed into apathy/foolishness" (courtesy of MPAA/RIAA mafia + youtube and friends), and the "Totalitarian states in constant war" is right around the corner--hell, you can see THAT just in the other comments here!

    13. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Neal Asher's Polity is pretty nice...with AIs that are almost as awesome as those in the Culture :D

    14. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations! You have increased your whuffie.

    15. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Whoa whoa whoa,

      controls us through the "utopia where the people are bribed into apathy/foolishness" (courtesy of MPAA/RIAA mafia + youtube and friends),

      I don't think you're giving enough weight to the message that Aldous Huxley tried to impart. It's not just the big-name corporate time-killers that get people to waste their lives, it is every form of recreation. From minesweeper to every indie game to the big-name AAA console titles. From drinking with friends, to bars, to that beer culture that's pervasive in universities. Miley Cyrus distracts the masses, but you can't discount the effects of that little mp3 player blaring constantly.

      Ever hear about how long it took someone to get the orb or Zot or the amulet of Yendor? Ever hear about YASD? Ever see those MASSIVE Minecraft creations. (And how they swore they did it in-game rather than using an editor).

      The crux here is that it's all just a waste of time. But hey, it keeps people happy, so it's hard to say that these are all bad things. Trying to get rid of recreation is ballstothewalls tyrannical. I'd have to say that moderation is important. In all thing, balance.

      #2 and #4, Orwell vs Huxley, aren't necessarily mutually exclusive, but they're certainly attacking society from different angles.

    16. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Aw bloody hell, I forgot about the drugs!

      Soma was a big part of Brave New World. Any sort of recreational drug use also falls under the category of what Huxley was warning us about.

      I can't believe I forgot about the sex, drugs, and rock'n'roll!

    17. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      How about Foundation world? Or a Nobots world (although I wouldn't want to be in the Martian military, or live on Venus)?

      And since we're talking about worlds that will likely never actually be, how about Middle Earth or a DiscWorld?

    18. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by Optali · · Score: 1

      nah, I vote for the Playboy option.
      Forget the robots and gimme pussy

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    19. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You would like the book I'm writing now, then. The robots just wash dishes and stuff, but there's 200 whores on a ship to Mars.

    20. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by metaforest · · Score: 1

      I'll take Neal Stephenson worlds for $700... Nothing lake a good alternative past, present or future to get the blood pumping...

    21. Re:Pick your favourite outcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would we rather see...

      - A Neal Stephenson world
      - A George Orwell world
      - A Cory Doctorow world
      - A Aldous Huxley world
      - Name your world...

      Gotta be The Culture... Sorry folks this is the only utopia you need, everything else is just bobbins by comparison

  11. Re:Wow! by sudden.zero · · Score: 1

    Agreed!

  12. Maybe his novel wasn't so novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A lot of fiction looks dated when current events or technology surpass what was supposed to be a look at the future. This time it caught up with this novelist before he even finished his story. Some are suggesting it caught up with him before he finished the previous piece of it.

    Such is the life of a novelist. Next time be more novel.

    1. Re:Maybe his novel wasn't so novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the only thing that made it worth while was the ancilary descriptions of technology? Yeah, this is why Sci-Fi sucks. You know there are perfectly good stories that are even set in present or even past periods of time that entertain the reader through plot development and interpersonal relationships.

    2. Re:Maybe his novel wasn't so novel by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good SF is a period piece set in the future. OK SF is about discovering some revolutionary new wonder. TV/Movie "skiffy" is about explosions and effects and depictions of new technology - ick.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Maybe his novel wasn't so novel by psithurism · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean the only thing that made it worth while was the ancilary descriptions of technology?

      These descriptions, to nerds, are like titty-shots in movies are to high school boys. Sure, maybe we go through the whole plot once once or twice, but what we really got the book for was to reread the technical, oh so technical, descriptions, and boners, err...uh, bonus for equations that we can work into simulations.

      plot development

      Also known as filler-between-technical-descriptions. I doubt anyone is ever entertained by that alone.

      interpersonal relationships

      I tried to Google this; still not sure what you're talking about here, but it sounds boring too.

    4. Re:Maybe his novel wasn't so novel by psithurism · · Score: 2

      That reply is actually especially relevant to this discussion. I don't like Stross's writing much; the characters aren't very interesting and his plot twists aren't handled well, but I keep reading his works for the all the mathematically derived apocalypses and computer generated magic.

    5. Re:Maybe his novel wasn't so novel by GrpA · · Score: 1

      This is true, but it's unfair to generalize all Science Fiction in this way. It doesn't really matter if what you write about is plausible or even possible. It doesn't even matter if it's already happened. A good story doesn't need to be completely fictional to work, because the strength is in the story you tell, not the technology in the world you've created.

      As a writer of science fiction myself, having originally set most of the developments in my story to occur and mature over the next century, I was surprised when told that my book was being used as a technology primer for the military to explain the level of technology development of existing applications with respect to virtual world military testing and AI development.

      I don't see this as "Well, there's no point writing this anymore, because I got it right" - I see this as more "I'm glad I got it right and now I can concentrate more on plot development in subsequent stories and less on the technology".

      And just because what I write is based on factual technology, it doesn't mean it isn't science fiction. The exact genre is "Technothriller" but it's still science fiction. :)

      GrpA

      --
      Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
    6. Re:Maybe his novel wasn't so novel by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Or just write faster!

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    7. Re:Maybe his novel wasn't so novel by dywolf · · Score: 1

      This. Except I stopped reading when I realized the stories sucked and were just an excuse to link together tons of technobabble jargon, however tenuously.

      Science fiction, as I learned it and came to appreciate it, was about evoking a sense of wonder, making the improbable probable, and examining the ramnifications of various lines of thought and technology as they evolve, when they converge, and even come into conflict (such as the digital age, and copyright; though I forget the name of the short story now, it basically predicted the current situation). Basically, the science isnt the end, it is the means to an end, and end involving thought and reflection on values/beliefs, etc, much like many other forms of literature. The key difference was always that while most literature focused that reflection on the past or present, science fiction focused on the future or possible what ifs, and came to its self-analysis through that lens.

      But again, the science (or magic, or whatever literary devies are used) wasn't the end in itself, it was the means to an end.

      And Stross is basically the complete antithesis to that concept.
      In his writing, the science, the technobabble, etc, IS the end. It is the reason for existence.
      The story is merely the vehicle with which to spew more made up jargon.
      His books are essentially about a step and half removed from being a dictionary, and with less entertainment value (imho).

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  13. Advice to Charles Stross by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 3, Funny

    Be quick and write that book where a large government structure, say like the Bastille,
    is being stormed by citizens, and the Repulbic of the truly Free can finally be established

    1. Re:Advice to Charles Stross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and don't worry about the fact the US and it's war on freedom extends well beyond its own borders.

    2. Re:Advice to Charles Stross by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Be quick and write that book where a large government structure, say like the Bastille,is being stormed by citizens, and the Repulbic of the truly Free can finally be established"

      Even blackjack and hookers would do nicely.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:Advice to Charles Stross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The book would probably be banned, though.

  14. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not just books. There I was, happily watching Person Of Interest, and then it turns out the premise behind a Sci-Fi show is true.

    I don't know how many bottles of scotch the writers must have got through before they managed to start writing Season 3, but I'm guessing it came by the crate.

  15. Imagine a boot... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

    The parts are all there to build the machine that tracks you amd ypur vehicle and phone, continuously, so someone could see a 3D Google map with you and a little right-click menu to call up your phone calls live, history (not just metafata) and a little ff/rw button to go back in time tracking you.

    There are a number of sci-fi stories, and a TV show now, with exactly this.

    Remember, NSA agents are supposed to fill out a form before listening in on the phone calls of presidents and senators and you.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  16. We don't have to buy novels anymore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Somehow, despite all the odds and the lessons learned from WW2 we managed it. Apparently the reality of corrupt, greedy, paranoid government abuse of civil rights in order to funnel cash to the owners of entities like Booz Allen Hamilton is too much: A noted science fiction author with futurist skills can't keep ahead even though he's the guy who figured out the trend of lifelogging as the likely end of privacy.
    We win, the news is a functional replacement for new Stross novels! Of course we lose too, because at this point it's only a question of who gets to be either middle class or upper class instead of a serf. Considering automation technology is advancing by leaps and bounds there may be no serfs in the future. That hypothesis is in accord with the Obama-administration play of drone strikes as the preferred means of dealing with unpersons.

    Seriously, we fucked up. We should've never let the surveillance-state develop and now it's too late to claw it back from Microsoft, Google, NRO, NSA and the rest of that terrifying crew of large bureaucracies. The only real question is whether we stand a chance in the war that has already started, or if they did too good a job of dividing and conquering and it'll just be slow extermination.

  17. I've had the same problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually just scrapped the entire beginning of my sci-fi novel a few years ago for the same reason. Part of it was set in the EU, with riots breaking out and political trouble over the unification of the EU government versus each EU signatory being able to make their own laws independently. I was even really proud of the riot scene I'd written, it felt amazing and was one of the best things I'd ever written according to others that read it. Then like a month after it was completed an incredibly similar thing happened with the Greek riots over austerity, with similarities down to the way the molotov cocktails were being used. Apparently I'd done my research too well.

    And this is why great science fiction novels have dropped compared to earlier decades. You write about drones being in the future and the next month you see Amazon experimenting with actually delivering packages with them. You write about people stuck in VR games and you read about someone dying on a Warcraft binge or see a talkshow host trying out the Occulus on his show. You need to go so far into the future, for which you need to know so much about physics and engineering and etc. to even try and predict what will happen, that you may as well start looking for a job applying that knowledge rather than struggle to be a writer with totally uncertain income.

    1. Re:I've had the same problem by Smauler · · Score: 1

      The plot you mention doesn't contain any sci-fi, at all. Drones have been about for ages, VR is still crap, and no one car get stuck in it (how would that even happen, anyway?).

      Predictive fiction has always been problematic... I don't know one writer who's got the last 50 years close to right. Half thought we'd be living on the moon and mars, the other half thought the Soviets would have invaded or bombed us to dust, and none of them predicted the pervasiveness of computers or the Internet.

    2. Re:I've had the same problem by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      You need to go so far into the future, for which you need to know so much about physics and engineering and etc. to even try and predict what will happen, that you may as well start looking for a job applying that knowledge rather than struggle to be a writer with totally uncertain income.

      Maybe that's a sign that the Singularity is indeed going to happen. The whole idea is that the speed of technological achievements continues to increase to the point new advances start coming faster than we can follow them. After the Singularity you're presumed to live like this: you start to become acquainted to the last industrial revolution-like development, with all it entails in terms of new technologies, and you hear it's already 20 generations behind, individual technological achievements within each of those revolutions so numerous they can't even be numbered. Then you start to vaguely and very superficially try to get a glimpse of what they were about and 50 new revolutions happened in the meantime...

      Science fiction just isn't possible when science goes faster than your writing. At best you start writing fantasy as the difference isn't clear anymore.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    3. Re:I've had the same problem by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Half thought we'd be living on the moon and mars

      They are just the ones that didn't see Nixon coming. Who would have thought that the USA would throw away an expensive space station despite having several years to save it and enough bits of Saturn V already built to do so. I think that was the turning point, throwing away Skylab, giving up on the moon and distracting everyone into the ever changing Shuttle project for long enough that a generation of expertise was lost.

  18. It was not predictive by Trogre · · Score: 2

    The NSA has been heavily monitoring Internet traffic since the 90s, and no one seemed to mind.

    Perhaps it was predictive in the sense of people suddenly becoming outraged about it now.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:It was not predictive by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      It's predictive if all you read is near-future sci-fi. Most of the sci-fi we call predictive is either mere coincidence or some bored engineer reading or watching it and deciding it's a cool thing to make things like sentient AI (Asimov, Clarke, et al), a multipurpose hand-held information acquisition tool (Star Trek), or a laser-based space defense system (Star Wars). So no suprise there. If you fire in one general direction enough times, you're bound to hit the bull's eye some time.

    2. Re:It was not predictive by Trogre · · Score: 2

      Indeed, that is true. Though I was referring more to the fact that while he was writing those books, the surveillance was already widely known to be happening in his present, not the future, and had been for some time.

      It would be a bit like writing a science fiction novel today that involved a global social network or semi-robotic car assembly lines.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:It was not predictive by HiThere · · Score: 3

      It wasn't public knowledge. Everyone who believed it was considered paranoid, at least during the 1960's-70's. Maybe they were. (If you think you know when they really started listening to everyone, I think you're over estimating certainty.)

      P.S.: Surveillance was not the point of the Stross books. It was background, Just like Scottish independence. In Halting State the big surprise was supposed to be a bank robbery inside a virtual game. Shortly after it was published, it happened in Eve-online. The police (and others) were wearing something considerably like google glass. (Actually, I think they looked more like a pair of heavy sunglasses, but I'd need to reread to be sure.) There were virtual overlays on reality published by advertisers, game players, etc. The wierd thing is those have started happening while almost nobody is wearing a VR headset. Spooks, a VR mixed with reality game, was a major subplot. So my brother-in-law walks in with a game called ghosts played on his phone, where he's supposed to chase around after a ghost that can only be seen on his phone, but where the chasing happens in physical space. (That's not Spooks, by any means. For one thing the ghost tried to get him to chase it in front of a car driving down the street. Spooks had more awareness of the actual surroundings.)

      Or, another sub-plot involved remotely driven taxis. But Google has nearly gotten fully automated vehicles working.

      Basicly, the world that developed made a lot of choices that weren't the same, and the stuff that was supposed to be new and exciting kept happening before most people bought the book. Near future SF used to be easier. Unexpected changes were slower in arriving. They ALWAYS arrived out of order, and with some choices not the same, but usually you had several years leeway (so most of your sales could happen before the book was obsolete).

      So now he's discontinued the series. And he's going to wait until the votes for Scottish independence and Britain remaining in the EU are in before he tries any more near future books. Quite reasonable. (Snarl! I don't care if the series didn't match this universe, I wanted the next volume.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:It was not predictive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having lived during the 60's - 70's, anyone who then thought the government was monitoring the Internet WAS paranoid (and delusional.)

    5. Re:It was not predictive by steelfood · · Score: 1

      The NSA has been heavily monitoring Internet traffic since the 90s

      Contrast that with today, where the NSA is actively storing all internet traffic and data mining it later. I could be wrong (it's the NSA after all), but I bet the scope of their operations did not extend to storing and retroactively data mining all internet traffic in the 90's. Perhaps they were storing information on certain key individuals that their monitoring software flagged, but not everybody's.

      Admittedly, these programs have been around since the early 2000's and there's been whispers of it in that time period, but while those were rumors then, now there is evidence.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    6. Re:It was not predictive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bible also contains rape and incest. Those aren't right in my book now or 2,000 years ago.

      Do you have any kind of fucking point except a sophist apology?

  19. We are already fucked ! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    You're fucked!

    We are already fucked no matter how you look at it.

    The technology that we have (and the more advanced versions of technology that the BIG BROTHERS get to play with) today already enables 24/7/365 tracking - and the way we laid out our "rules and regulation" we have already submitted EVERYTHING THAT IS RELATED TO US (our name, our address, our car registration number, our HAM radio identification, our spouse' identity, the identity of our children, our education, the subjects that we took in the schools, and so on) to the authority (aka BIG BROTHERS).

    They know us better than we know ourselves.

    They know us so well that they can actually predict what we most probably going to do and/or going to be next week/month/year, while most of us do not even know what we are going to do next weekend.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  20. They don't need to crack anything by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    All indications are that Verisign and others were compelled to turn over their master keys, so what's left to crack? Seriously, via MitM they can own just about any internet-using box on the planet, and failing that, there's always the cousin of Stuxnet.

    The only solution at this point is a human one - make them stop. Technologically, it's already past game over.

    1. Re:They don't need to crack anything by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Or stop trusting central authorities. Run a certificate authority, hand out keys out-of-band, and do the "Web of trust" thing the old fashioned way.

      There's no reason you need somebody like Verisign for personal, or even public, communication.

    2. Re:They don't need to crack anything by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      No reason other than every browser on the planet warning its users not to trust your certificate authority, you mean?

    3. Re:They don't need to crack anything by wed128 · · Score: 1

      They *SHOULD* warn, unless the person browsing explicitly trusts you. That's the whole point.

  21. Unless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe what really happened is that the NSA got to him. Maybe he was a bit too clairvoyant.

    1. Re:Unless... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Maybe his new book would have been about intelligence agencies threatening science fiction authors who come too close to reality. The NSA read his manuscript from his computer and thought: "Great idea, let's test it on him."

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  22. Well... by sharknado · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't have cancelled the trilogy - there's a unique opportunity here for a twist ending. For example, the president of the NSA could be a cyborg. Or maybe the third book could be a satire - introduce a Snowden-type character into the novel and have him assassinated / kidnapped by the government, or start a war between the US and the country providing his asylum that ends in nuclear winter.

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems the NSA is into turning fiction into fact - so don't give them any ideas.

      How about a twist where the NSA say they won't illegally spy anymore (and mean it), delete all old data, and everyone lives happily ever after. (Copy that one NSA!)

    2. Re:Well... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      After hearing about the Star Trek set thing it appears that satire of the NSA has nowhere to go. Reality appears to be far more stupid than readers would be willing to swallow.

    3. Re:Well... by russotto · · Score: 1

      Or maybe the third book could be a satire - introduce a Snowden-type character into the novel and have him assassinated / kidnapped by the government, or start a war between the US and the country providing his asylum that ends in nuclear winter.

      Doesn't work; the UK authorities (who are in cahoots with the US on this) in Charles Stross's worlds are reasonable authority figures -- the good guys.

    4. Re:Well... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      His books are actually set in Scotland, and the spys work for the EU. The NSA being the heavy isn't appropriate for the series. (It's supposed to be "The man from Uncle"...to paraphrase a joke from Halting State.)

      OTOH, maybe it's just as well. His series seem to have a tendency to start out light, and then become progressively grimmer. (Well, I haven't followed the Merchant Princes, and I gave up on the Laundry when it got too grim in the 3rd volume. So maybe it then gets lighter again.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Well... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well, the Scottish police are good guys. I'm not so sure about either the UK figures or the EU figures. They seem to be basically well meaning, and able to justify their actions to themselves, but... outsiders may frequently have a hard time accepting their justifications, and with good reason.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:Well... by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      the president of the NSA could be a cyborg

      We are all cyborgs now.

    7. Re:Well... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I guess the part of star trek which fascinated them most was the captain asking: "Computer, where's Riker?" and getting an accurate response immediately ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    8. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to avoid Glasshouse, then (although it has a pretty happy ending). And don't even stand downwind of Scratch Monkey (it doesn't).

  23. A Larry Niven world by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    More options, and more hope.. and Moties look like they would be fun to hang out with. Tho preferably after the Kzin wars are over.. i don't want to be eaten by a cat.

    Can i sign up to be an ARM agent?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  24. A scary thought. by Molt · · Score: 4, Funny

    It could be worse, The Laundry could be becoming reality.

    --
    404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    1. Re:A scary thought. by psithurism · · Score: 1

      Speaking of The Laundry series, he had to change the villains in the Atrocity Archives after they, Al-quada turned out to actually be planning an attack on US soil.

      I think he needs to start writing something pleasant and nondistopian, because it is looking more and more like someone is channeling his writing into the real world. Uh oh, I think he predicted that too, in The Jennifer Morgue.

    2. Re:A scary thought. by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I have dreams about code Nightmare Green. I hope that doesn't make me a sensitive.

    3. Re:A scary thought. by Unipuma · · Score: 1

      Well, BP did violate the Benthic Treaties...

  25. The real problem here... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

    ... anything sufficiently distancing itself from reality is too farfetched to make a plausible premise. I mean, he COULD say that they take DNA from citizens and then create virtual humans inside a matrix to predict human interaction to better control the population.

    Then we have a virtual Snowden break lose on the web like Max Headroom and someone ends up with another case of writers block.

    --
    >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  26. Douglas Adams by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    HHGTTG had six books in the trilogy, so I think we are being short-changed here...

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:Douglas Adams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or... in making a six-book trilogy, Douglas Adams threatened to violate the symmetry of the trinity. Nature had to cut other trilogies short in order to restore balance to the universe.

    2. Re:Douglas Adams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the balance has already been restored. You see, I have exactly zero books in my trilogy.

  27. By not giving them any idea ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    It seems the NSA is into turning fiction into fact - so don't give them any ideas

    You and I may think that as long as we do not give them any idea it's fine.

    But you and I do not know that by deciding NOT to give them any idea, it is already another IMPORTANT idea that we are giving to the NSA (and all other BIG BROTHERS)

    Remember, to those who know how to play this game - Silence is an answer, non-cooperation is an action, and not-giving-any-idea by itself is a very useful idea.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  28. New direction for his creativity by namgge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps Mr Stross could use his skills to to describe an imaginary world where the government told the whole truth to the electorate, there was a right to privacy, and only politicians were systematically spied on and investigated...

    It sure would be interesting to know what that would be like.

    1. Re:New direction for his creativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That would not be science fiction. That would be fantasy.

    2. Re:New direction for his creativity by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Ian M. Banks' Culture series does that pretty well.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:New direction for his creativity by anarcat · · Score: 1

      Actually, that last part (politicians were systematically spied on and investigated) is one of the key plot elements of the novel "The Circle" by Dave Eggers - except everyone is spied on there...

      --
      Semantics is the gravity of abstraction
    4. Re:New direction for his creativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ian M. Banks' Culture series does that pretty well.

      Really? I thought most of the business of actually running the Culture (i.e. what passes for a government in it) is run by unelected AI Minds, which frequently resent having to explain their reasoning to mere humans and therefore generally don't bother. ISTR there are democratically elected positions, but they're mostly considered to just be figureheads, with most of the actual work done by the Minds. And I don't suspect attempting to spy on the Minds (who have abilities to communicate with each other in ways that a human couldn't possibly even begin to understand) would get you very far.

    5. Re:New direction for his creativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you fail to take into account that Dave Eggers is a cunt.

    6. Re:New direction for his creativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That world isn't compatible with coercive authority, which requires inequality of power between the ruling class and the subject class.

    7. Re:New direction for his creativity by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Makes sense.
      Privacy is fundamentally at odds with the notion of transparency.
      But thats true of a lot of human ideals (being in conflict that is).

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  29. I DON'T CARE by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

    I still want to read it!!!! I love Stross' work and I imagine his 3rd installment would still be a good read, regardless of real world applicability.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:I DON'T CARE by lgw · · Score: 1

      He's still writing a book with many of the same ideas. I'll just be glad if he drops the "second person storytelling" gimmick. That was clever for about one chapter, and most people won't even get the joke.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:I DON'T CARE by psithurism · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, he won't stop writing; he just won't publish this particular story. He's going to go write something else which he thinks you will enjoy reading even more!

  30. Cop out by squidflakes · · Score: 0

    Wait, so I can literally blame anything on the NSA?

    I ran out of ideas and motivation for my next book because of the NSA!

    I'm late for work today because of the NSA!

    Sorry, I can't afford child support this month because of the NSA!

    This really sounds like a steaming pile of bullshit to me. Not that I'm in any way supportive of the actions of the NSA, but stating that you're not going to finish a series because it has become too much like real life just smacks of someone taking an easy way out.

    1. Re:Cop out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so I can literally blame anything on the NSA?

      I ran out of ideas and motivation for my next book because of the NSA!

      I'm late for work today because of the NSA!

      Sorry, I can't afford child support this month because of the NSA!

      This really sounds like a steaming pile of bullshit to me. Not that I'm in any way supportive of the actions of the NSA, but stating that you're not going to finish a series because it has become too much like real life just smacks of someone taking an easy way out.

      Actually, he got a quiet visit from some people who informed him that certain critical plot elements divulged matters covered under the Official Secrets act. Including the part of the Act that itself is kept secret. And they took away his drafts and manuscripts. Because of the NSA!

    2. Re:Cop out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I actually did RTFA (well, I follow Stross's blog...), and he said nothing of the kind. In his opinion, the NSA revelations break the universe he created for Halting State/Rule 34 so he does not feel like another book in the same continuity makes sense. On the other hand, Halting State and Rule 34 weren't really related plot-wise anyway, so the fact that the third book---which the linked blog post says he still intends to write--won't be in that continuity doesn't seem like that big a deal to me.

    3. Re:Cop out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Rule 34 book is nothing like the pics would led you to believe.

    4. Re:Cop out by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      So that's where my anal polyps came from! NSA!!

  31. NSA does not have a quantum computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting anonymously for obvious reasons.

    People who think it's plausible that the NSA has a quantum computer do not now how insanely hard is it to build one.

    I'm a PhD student in physics, and I know personally several people trying to build real quantum computers. The ones that are most advanced -- the Innsbruck group -- have a design that's inherently non-scalable (ion trap). An the ones that do have a scalable design (my best guess are the superconducting qubits at IBM) are still decades away from being useful.

    To think that NSA would have managed to build a quantum computer and keep it a secret is on the same level of insanity as thinking the US would have been able to make the Manhattan project and kept it a secret for 20 years.

    1. Re:NSA does not have a quantum computer by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      20 years without actually using a device, or WITH using one? Popping off one little nuke, with witnesses, really changes the challenge factor there.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  32. Started writing it in 2006 by koan · · Score: 1

    Bro do you even type?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  33. This got modded up? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    So somebody that has been continuously publishing work gets accused of writers block?

    1. Re:This got modded up? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Well, writers block happens to anyone who writes. It's a natural state of the process, IMHO. I bet a prolific writer like Stross probably experiences and overcomes more writers block than I will ever see. What might have happened here is that Stross came up with a better and from his point of view more engaging story and simply lost the desire to continue the existing trilogy.

      I suppose he could have applied nose to grindstone and crank out a final novel in the series, but that wouldn't be much fun. Maybe he doesn't need the money either.

    2. Re:This got modded up? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Stross has more than once (now) decided that he didn't like the was a series was going, and ended it. It's not exactly writer's block, because he wrote something else instead, but it still ended the series.

      In the "Singularity Sky" series he decided that he couldn't avoid the bad guy's winning in the third volume, so he just decided to stop with "Iron Sunrise". In the "Halting State" series, Scotland was an independent country. Most of his outrageous ideas kept happening (so far "Athena" hasn't yet shown up). Etc. So he decided that he didn't like how it was going. And he's declared it ended. (A pity. Those were my two favorite series of his.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:This got modded up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IOW, he's a shit writer who can't retcon around problems.

  34. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Person of interest is taking an interesting turn towards sci-fi, one of my faves.

  35. Given that Mr. Stross' books come true... by runeghost · · Score: 1

    Can we have a Kickstarter to get Charlie Stross to write a book about a nice utopic Singularity where nothing horrible happens to anyone?

    1. Re:Given that Mr. Stross' books come true... by Artifakt · · Score: 2

      In a word, NO. Stross wrote three books that are formally Singularity/Post Singularity novels, and I guarentee you he absolutely cannot write a nice utopic singularity (although Accelerando has a happy ending for some lobster dataclones, and some individual people in the Iron Sunrise duology make it through all the horrible things happening and have nice enough individual lives, a Strossian Singularity inevitiably includes mass extinctions.). His current series include one with a possible future singularity-like event looming over the protagonists, as directed by Lovecraft's Nyarlathotep, and a "fun with cultural misunderstandings of various robots, settling down after they have already killed off their human masters" series. Read his short novella, "Missle Gap", or "A Colder War", and THEN ask youself if he could write a story where where everything changes but nothing horrible happens to anyone. You could offer him income like J. K. Rowling's to do it, it's the one thing he just couldn't do.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  36. Not a prediction, its their Manual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If everything is coming true, you're not writing a story.

    You are writing them a manual, and they're following it. Stop it!

  37. Version 2.0 by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    He should go back to the previous books, revamp them then publish updated versions as v2.0.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  38. Could the NSA be spying on the Laundry? by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    Get all that encryption math and computer power together, and . . . what gets summoned?

  39. Your Faildependence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hee hee you think youre funny. thats so precious! FAIL

  40. Don't feel bad by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1, Funny

    I had an idea for a book (that I'd probably never write) where a Canadian spy service turned out to be one of the worst offenders for international assholery. The basic premise was that nobody would think of Canada as a bunch of meddling douch-nozzles; and then damn it turns out we are.

    The whole stupid thing is that if you were to add up all the value that Canada has received from our super spy stuff that it would pale in comparison to the damage that has been done to our international reputation. How many companies won't deal with us? How many countries don't view us as fairplay sorts of people? How many countries are now going to think, "If Canada is even doing it then so should we."?

    If it turns out that the spies were stopping a James Bond level supervillain every month or so then it might have been worth it. But my guess is that the sum total was that other spy agencies fed crap information to us combines with their discovery that people who they knew were bad, were, in fact, bad.

    But the premise of my book being that Canadian's could wander the globe un-molested (except for the 2 minutes that people thought they were Americans) is now in the crapper. Prior to recent events I suspect that a Canadian who wandered into North Korea could potentially be believed that he thought that South Korea was the one he wasn't allowed to do and then before he was released organize a mining contract with the government.

    1. Re:Don't feel bad by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If it turns out that the spies were stopping a James Bond level supervillain every month or so then it might have been worth it.

      That's the problem with all of this massive state defense apparatus bullshit. I know people who are various types of special forces and they will happily tell you that there are real threats out there, but then they will tell you that they can't tell you anything about them. In truth, they actually know fuck-all, and are just going by whatever their higher-ups have told them. They have no idea who the hell they're being sent out to kill, except what they're told.

      In fact, our military has been shown to act primarily for profit, not for defense. Poor, brainwashed dupes. I'd feel worse for them if they weren't killers for hire.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Don't feel bad by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      A great study on useless organizations would be to find a charity that works to stop something that is then fixed/cured. I would love to watch them squirm to figure out how to justify their continued existence. An upcoming episode in this drama will be when driverless cars run over the purpose of MADD. I am not sure what even vaguely related cause they can convert to. If you cured some kind of cancer any related charities could simply move to another prevalent cancer. But drunk driving is a fairly focused and isolated topic. My guess is that they will convert to a temperance movement but that won't raise the big bucks and thus not protect their existence.

  41. Another Example Fiction = Reality: TobakkoNacht by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I sympathize with Charles Stross's problem. When I wrote "TobakkoNacht" in 1997, it was based on a prediction that by the mid 2020s we'd be seeing the introduction of smoking bans outdoors in public plazas (which NY's Bloomberg brought in three years ago and has been emulated in California and elsewhere), smoking bans in brothels to protect the "working girls" (old news now in Canada), people being shot in smoking disputes (numbers of them by now, including two pregnant women, as well as country singer Wayne Mills last week), a worldwide antitobacco treaty (similar to the 2000s' "World Framework On Tobacco Control" that is now threatening countries that refuse to abide by its dictates) and a president having to hide his evil smoking habit. The problem was that aside from a preliminary Kindle short story version in late 2008, I didn't get to fully publish it until a few months ago as an opening fiction-piece in "TobakkoNacht -- The Antismoking Endgame." When I originally wrote the story I was criticized for supposing that any such things could come about as early as the 2020s ... or *ever* come about at all.

    NOT "anonymous coward" here:
    Michael J. McFadden
    Author of "TobakkoNacht -- The Antismoking Endgame"

    1. Re:Another Example Fiction = Reality: TobakkoNacht by nojayuk · · Score: 1

      That's a bit like AsbestosNacht -- the idea that the wonder material of the twentieth century, asbestos, was a toxic hazard to health would have been laughed at by the enlightened rationalists of the 1930s and 1940s. Fortunately everyone knows tobacco is harmless and indeed positively beneficial hence the presence of public smokatoriums burning the weed in city centres so everyone can enjoy its healthgiving effects and pleasant odours. And let's not forget those other boons to mankind, lead and mercury, so prevalent in the atmosphere and drinking water...

    2. Re:Another Example Fiction = Reality: TobakkoNacht by twocows · · Score: 1

      I don't think GP is suggesting that smoking is the healthiest thing, merely that over-legislating it is ridiculous. I agree with several of his points: banning outdoor smoking is ridiculous, shooting someone over cigarettes is absurd, and public figures having to hide their perfectly legal habits is silly. That said, I see nothing wrong with a smoking ban in brothels and I don't know enough about the anti-tobacco treaty he mentioned to provide an informed opinion about it. Overall, I agree that where we are now is a bit past where we should be.

    3. Re:Another Example Fiction = Reality: TobakkoNacht by dargaud · · Score: 1

      banning outdoor smoking is ridiculous

      ...no it's not. I avoid going to restaurant terraces nowadays because it's impossible to breathe: all the smokers sit there and keep pumping during the entire meal. You eat in a cloud of smoke.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    4. Re:Another Example Fiction = Reality: TobakkoNacht by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Yes it is....if its a blanket ban.
      Once again, both of you are both right and wrong, but you are both speaking in generalities, in blanket statements.
      As usual, the devil is in the details.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    5. Re:Another Example Fiction = Reality: TobakkoNacht by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So first the anti-smokers kick all the smokers outdoors, now all the anti-smokers want to hang out inside and outside, and it is impossible to open a pro-smoking establishment without some jackass coming in and demanding that they not have to breathe smoke. I even hear people complaining about the e-cigarettes like they are just as bad to be around as regular cigarettes.

  42. "The present is becoming the future.. by blahblahwoofwoof · · Score: 2

    ..faster than it is becoming the past."

    (That may be a paraphrase of a quote in the last year or so from a lady whose name I can't recall. Nor can I find the original text where it appeared. But it has stuck with me just the same. My apologies to the original author.)

  43. Good going by Roseainsworth · · Score: 1

    Writing is not easy for everyone as when you are writing about something which you imagine, If you are doing ok with it you are one of the best writers, everyone can write about current issues but writing about something you never seen only listing the stories and with watching movies that make it more difficult which you are doing right now. Appreciate it what you are doing right now and wish you the best of luck.

  44. What an asshole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't heard of this moron or his books. But I can only imagine that his fans are pretty pissed that he's canceling a book to try to make a political statement and that he will "state" his way into insignificance as a result.

    What a pompous prick.

  45. Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The headline is wrong, and the quotation in the summary isn't his reason for not writing a third book.

    He's not continuing the series because it depends on a familiar near-future Scotland, and the coming referendum makes it near impossible to know what that will look like. Also, he never promised a trilogy in the first place, so he isn't cancelling anything. Just not writing a further book.

  46. pedantic nerds are us by doom · · Score: 1

    By the way, may I thank all of the pedantic nerds in the audience for complaining that the headline joke is not a precise replication of the entire content of Stross's posting, as well as making the clear implication that there is something terribly misleading about not quoting the entire post so as to make it obvious to people unwilling to click on the link that Stross actually does know something about current events in Scotland?

    I'm glad to see that you guys are upholding standards. You make slashdot what it is, truly.

    But I must say that people accusing Stross of simply making excuses for writer's block and so on are doing an awfully weak job... if you actually knew anything about Stross you'd realize that he is extremely prolific, and is in fact one of the more highly regarded SF writers out there at the moment (though admittedly, only among people who actually read).

    And if you want to look all clever and accuse Stross of being disingenuous, you're missing the obvious: he's bragging, and hiding it inside an amusing complaint: "Oh no, I got everything right again! I hate it when that happens!".

  47. Scotland != Catalonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Act of Union between England and Scotland explicitly grants the right to Scotland to secede.
    The Spanish Constitution explicitly forbids secession