He can't see the feed in real time unless he watches his own video stream (in which case it would be a video stream of him staring at a monitor).
It would be a video stream of a monitor. He would not be seen, except maybe as mirror image on the monitor. Otherwise the only reason we would know that he's watching his own video stream would be that the monitor would itself show that monitor showing that monitor showing that monitor showing that monitor...
You have the right to keep arms. But where does it say you have the right to buy arms? It could just mean that if you inherited an arm, no one may take it away from you.
It says you have the right to keep and bear arms, but not how many arms you are allowed to keep and bear. So you could be restricted to keep at most two arms (one arm isn't possible because of the plural).
Also: "The right of the people" could be interpreted not as the right of the individuals, but as the right of the people as a whole (sorry, I don't know how to word it better; if you know German, it's the difference between the two translations "die Leute" and "das Volk"). So maybe it doesn't say that you individually have the right to keep arms, but that should it be allowed to keep arms at publicly accessible places, so in case it's necessary the people can get them.
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives. Those legislative powers shall only be wielded to the advantage of the country. The most relevant factor oft the country's well-being is identified as the economy. The advantage of the economy is equivalent to the well-being of the relevant companies, where relevance is measured by market share. Members of the Congress, of the Senate and of the House of representatives shall give due consideration to the advice given by the experts working for the corporations.
I guess a real lawyer could make this two pages long, and an order of magnitude less obvious...
There's a difference between being default and being the only option. If Google payed Mozilla to have Google as the only search engine for the search bar, it would reflect poorly on Google.
If his philosophy includes the claim that property is bad, and that everyone should be entitled to take anything he wants, then being a thief doesn't contradict being a philosopher. However, that philosopher might find out about the problems of his philosophy very soon if people start to apply it to his property.:-)
But while Europe experienced the movable type printing revolution in 15th - 16th centuries, in Muslim countries the movable type print was banned for 200 years for "moral" reason.
Well, probably because they had seen what it did to the catholic church.
It's indeed correct in German to put a comma there, but not because of what the verb indicates, but because in German there's always a comma between main clause and subordinate clause (the main clause in this case only consists of the word "check").
It must still be a valid sentence if you remove the bit between the commas, how hard is that?
It's rather hard to remove anything between the commas when there's only one.:-)
Interesting. I'm not in the habit of quoting nonexistent people, so would it be:
"The Earth is six thousand years old." -- God, The Bible by God.
or
"The Earth is six thousand years old." -- God, Deity.
Let's ignore the fact that nowhere in the bible you'll find the sentence "The Earth is six thousand years old." Assuming that sentence would be found there, and further assuming that the bible claimed that God said that, the correct quote would be:
"The earth is six thousand years old" -- God, The Bible, unknown author.
And given that the bible wasn't originally written in English, you also should write which translation of the bible you're quoting.
So I'd have to say that public intoxication is the odd man out -- merely walking down the street while drunk isn't a threat to anyone's safety, rights, or property. Right?
Wrong. You may cross a street without noticing a car, because you are too drunk to notice it, and this way cause an accident.
From the media? I don't know which media you are watching, but the only medium I get this stereotype from is Slashdot. And no, I'm not in America. So that's no explanation.
Universities and colleges exist to educate people and hand them a piece of paper letting them get a job.
No, they exist to educate people and hand them a piece of paper certifying that they successfully studied there. It happens that this paper helps them to find a job, and surely many want it only for that purpose, but it's not what the paper is for. It's up to the employers to decide whether they care about the paper or not.
Yes, but this is all determined by what happens outside the horizon. Anything which happens inside the horizon cannot affect anything observable, including the observed black hole mass, outside of the horizon of the black hole (neglecting Hawking radiation; if a black hole radiates away, I'm not sure if anything inside could be revealed).
Slashdot Mirror
No. Even at near light speed, the future is still, well, in the future.
He needs an eye patch when going to the cinema. In other words, he would have to look like a pirate in order to not be accused to be one. :-)
It would be a video stream of a monitor. He would not be seen, except maybe as mirror image on the monitor. Otherwise the only reason we would know that he's watching his own video stream would be that the monitor would itself show that monitor showing that monitor showing that monitor showing that monitor ...
Then you should invest in perpetual motion machine research. :-)
Well, that would be enough: Love heart for yes, middle finger for no. Gives you one bit. Everything can be made up from bits.
A few more points:
You have the right to keep arms. But where does it say you have the right to buy arms? It could just mean that if you inherited an arm, no one may take it away from you.
It says you have the right to keep and bear arms, but not how many arms you are allowed to keep and bear. So you could be restricted to keep at most two arms (one arm isn't possible because of the plural).
Also: "The right of the people" could be interpreted not as the right of the individuals, but as the right of the people as a whole (sorry, I don't know how to word it better; if you know German, it's the difference between the two translations "die Leute" and "das Volk"). So maybe it doesn't say that you individually have the right to keep arms, but that should it be allowed to keep arms at publicly accessible places, so in case it's necessary the people can get them.
Like this:
Article I - The Legislative Branch
Section 1 - The Legislature
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives. Those legislative powers shall only be wielded to the advantage of the country. The most relevant factor oft the country's well-being is identified as the economy. The advantage of the economy is equivalent to the well-being of the relevant companies, where relevance is measured by market share. Members of the Congress, of the Senate and of the House of representatives shall give due consideration to the advice given by the experts working for the corporations.
I guess a real lawyer could make this two pages long, and an order of magnitude less obvious ...
There's a difference between being default and being the only option.
If Google payed Mozilla to have Google as the only search engine for the search bar, it would reflect poorly on Google.
Are you sure there's no clause in the Windows EULA that effectively says Microsoft may mess around with any program running under Windows?
A firewall is a wall against fire. A firewall in your pants is known as asbestos underwear.
If his philosophy includes the claim that property is bad, and that everyone should be entitled to take anything he wants, then being a thief doesn't contradict being a philosopher. However, that philosopher might find out about the problems of his philosophy very soon if people start to apply it to his property. :-)
Well, "Zuckerberg" is German for "mountain of sugar" - very sweet, but not really good for you. Just like facebook.
You mean, he likes narcissus?
No.
Did you ask them where the bible says so?
That's of course nonsense. He got them from Benjamin Sisko. :-)
Don't worry. They'll stop when they reached "70 years after the end of the universe."
Well, probably because they had seen what it did to the catholic church.
It's indeed correct in German to put a comma there, but not because of what the verb indicates, but because in German there's always a comma between main clause and subordinate clause (the main clause in this case only consists of the word "check").
It's rather hard to remove anything between the commas when there's only one. :-)
Interesting. I'm not in the habit of quoting nonexistent people, so would it be:
"The Earth is six thousand years old." -- God, The Bible by God.
or
"The Earth is six thousand years old." -- God, Deity.
Let's ignore the fact that nowhere in the bible you'll find the sentence "The Earth is six thousand years old." Assuming that sentence would be found there, and further assuming that the bible claimed that God said that, the correct quote would be:
"The earth is six thousand years old" -- God, The Bible, unknown author.
And given that the bible wasn't originally written in English, you also should write which translation of the bible you're quoting.
Wrong. You may cross a street without noticing a car, because you are too drunk to notice it, and this way cause an accident.
You didn't. The Anonymous Coward I answered to did.
From the media? I don't know which media you are watching, but the only medium I get this stereotype from is Slashdot.
And no, I'm not in America. So that's no explanation.
No, they exist to educate people and hand them a piece of paper certifying that they successfully studied there. It happens that this paper helps them to find a job, and surely many want it only for that purpose, but it's not what the paper is for. It's up to the employers to decide whether they care about the paper or not.
Yes, but this is all determined by what happens outside the horizon. Anything which happens inside the horizon cannot affect anything observable, including the observed black hole mass, outside of the horizon of the black hole (neglecting Hawking radiation; if a black hole radiates away, I'm not sure if anything inside could be revealed).
For a rotating black hole, the singularity is not a point, but a ring.