Slashdot Mirror


Smart Underwear Designed For Military

A team of scientists at the University of California San Diego, led by nano-engineering professor Joseph Wang, has designed some high-tech underwear that may save lives. Sensors in the waistband can monitor a person's blood pressure, heart rate, and other vital signs. The designers also hope that one day the underwear can release drugs to relieve pain and treat wounds. From the article: "But the technology's range of application goes beyond the military. 'We envision all the trend of personalized medicine for remote monitoring of the elderly at home, monitoring a wide range of biomedical markers, like cardiac markers, alerting for any potential stroke, diabetic changes, and other changes related to other biomedical scenario,' said Wang. Wearable biosensors can also provide valuable information to athletes or even measure blood alcohol levels."

169 comments

  1. Joke by al3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll totally mod up the first person who makes a joke about a guy named Wang heading up military underwear research. Doh!

    1. Re:Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be an even better joke if you worked in the nanoengineering Wang angle...

    2. Re:Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google already tracks your location, and now, your vital stats via your wi-fi underware!! the future is looking so good!!!

    3. Re:Joke by Forge · · Score: 4, Funny

      I knew they were repealing "Don't ask, Don't tell" but isn't this going a little too far?

      "Printed on the waistband and in constant contact with the skin is an electronic biosensor, designed to measure blood pressure, heart rate and other vital signs."

      Translation: When blood flow to your Wang increases they will know. If you are in a room full of guys, they don't have to ask and you don't have to tell.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    4. Re:Joke by somersault · · Score: 1

      Any underwear designed by a Wang has got to be nice and comfortable. And I think the elderly will love this convenient method of administering viagra when their heart rate gets over a certain level..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Joke by spazdor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      New rule, everyone. Remarking that there's an obvious joke to be made, counts as making that joke.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    6. Re:Joke by al3 · · Score: 1

      My work here is done, then.

    7. Re:Joke by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      "led by nano-engineering professor Joseph Wang, has designed some high-tech underwear that may save lives." This is just the perfect storm for jokes. I'm surprised no-one has ran with the nano line yet...

      These underwear may not protect your back, but they've got your ass!

    8. Re:Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Smart" design would have been to colour them brown, surely?

    9. Re:Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not biting, smartypants.

    10. Re:Joke by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      a joke about a guy named Wang

      OK, I know your funny bones wouldn't want to know this, but Wang in Chinese means King, a surname also popular in the states.

    11. Re:Joke by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      but Wang in Chinese means King, a surname also popular in the states

      Johnson is a surname (and the most popular surname in the USA), but it is still slang for your wang.

      Dick is a common nickname for "Richard", and slang for your johnson.

      I could go on and on, but if you need more references, watch an Austin Power's movie.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:Joke by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      hmmm, I get it. The most popular name in the USA is Richard Johnson.

    13. Re:Joke by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ok, but if everyone is "going commando"...

      Kinda makes the new tech a moot point, eh?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Joke by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I have an inlaw with that name.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    15. Re:Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my father-in-law is named Willy Boner.

    16. Re:Joke by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Are you saying Chinese kings were dicks?

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    17. Re:Joke by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      I meant if people know the original or others meanings of a word, they might be less inclined to joke about it every time they see the word. As others pointed out they are other names with this kind of connotation, but they were all well established real names before their slang meanings.

    18. Re:Joke by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      By established I meant in English.

    19. Re:Joke by initialE · · Score: 1

      And saying that you will mod someone up counts as a mod?

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    20. Re:Joke by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      part of human nature in north america. we laugh at stupid sounding names. never name you kid something stupid. if your last is 'head', don't name your kid richard. Like one guy said here, if you last name is banger, don't name your kid william (willy banger). etc. We here in north america WILL laugh at them once old enough to understand the joke. Maybe in front of you, maybe behind your back. And for god sake, never name your kid 'Cuntfacedbastard-whoshootswetloavesofhighdensityriebreadpouthisassandsmellslikewombatshit'. Well OK, if you last name is 'smith' it might not be so bad.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    21. Re:Joke by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Only if they phrase it in a way to indicate they will only mod up somebody who replies to their post...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    22. Re:Joke by drkim · · Score: 1

      ..and you wonder why no one every invites you out to the comedy club. I can just imagine you whispering to your friends now:

      "The real reason airline food is bad is because it has to be stored for long periods during flight and retain it's taste during re-heating..."

    23. Re:Joke by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the stress monitor is a simple load sensor in the rear - if the soldier's shat themselves they've probably just been shot...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    24. Re:Joke by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      Like calling your kids Shut Up and You Bastard.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    25. Re:Joke by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 1

      Perfect colour scheme is yellow spots in the front, brown stripes in the back :-)

      --
      while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();
    26. Re:Joke by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      How would that work? If somebody replies to your post, that means that you have made a post, which means that you can no longer mod.

      ... unless you mod unrelated posts by the same person in another story, but such behaviour is usually frowned upon...: a post should be modded in its own right (i.e. being in reply to the right post), not for rewarding/punishing the poster (...having done another post which is worth modding)

    27. Re:Joke by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      but Wang in Chinese means King, a surname also popular in the states

      So they're Wang King undies?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    28. Re:Joke by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      There might be some cultural misunderstanding. I grew up in the third world so airline food seems pretty good to me and I don't get airline food jokes.

  2. nice, add a viagra IV and they are good to go by alen · · Score: 0

    for that special moment

    1. Re:nice, add a viagra IV and they are good to go by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      That's just in the model designed for the generals. Can't have a four star with erectile dysfunction starting WWIII now can we...

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    2. Re:nice, add a viagra IV and they are good to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erection - Now available on-demand!

  3. Bonus side effects by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once Smart Underwear catches on in the public, it'll become just a regular technology, like a cell phone.

    Now guys, how many times have you seen girls check out another girl's phone when she buys a new one? How many times have you been able to go, "Hey, can I see your phone?" and they'll whip it out and show it to you.

    One day, it'll be as easy as "Hey, can I see your Smart Underwear?" and she'll be like "Can I see yours too?".

    Trust me, this is going to be awesome.

    1. Re:Bonus side effects by TerranFury · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      +5 Insightful? Really? Really?

    2. Re:Bonus side effects by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I keep trying to make a joke out of a "Firewall in my pants" pun but I can't quite find a way to work it into a pickupline or a good setup...

    3. Re:Bonus side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep trying to make a joke out of a "Firewall in my pants" pun but I can't quite find a way to work it into a pickupline or a good setup...

      That's because it's not funny or sexy. The only thing a "firewall in your pants" might refer to is some kind of burning inflammation, or that you have something wall-shaped in there, which nobody's going to want to touch either.

    4. Re:Bonus side effects by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Funny

      When you're taking a girl home and she asks, "You do have protection, right?", you can respond truthfully that "Yes, I have a firewall in my pants."

      That was awful.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    5. Re:Bonus side effects by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      A firewall is a wall against fire. A firewall in your pants is known as asbestos underwear.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Bonus side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like your vision of the future and wish to subscribe to it.

    7. Re:Bonus side effects by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      fwall=time_gaming_talk / probability_someone_getting_in_pants

      fwall is very small to begin with, but quickly approaches 0. Inverse relationship, worse as time goes on.

    8. Re:Bonus side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you die.

    9. Re:Bonus side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, awesome.

      I envision a day where situations like this one may be common in the middle of the streets:

      - "Poor fellow, what happened to him? He seems totally unconscious!"

      - "Apparently his smart underwear went out of control and released high amounts of drug throughout his body. Now the smart underwear emergency group has arrived and is being careful in getting rid of this piece of cloth, lest they get affected too".

    10. Re:Bonus side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to ask, just tune in your bluetooth and you can see a picture of 'em (with obligatory link to Amazon to buy them) ;-)

    11. Re:Bonus side effects by JustABlitheringIdiot · · Score: 1

      Only works if you are a redhead. Wanna see the firewall in my pants? It has a direct interface with my Wang designed smart underwear.

  4. Styles by ATestR · · Score: 1

    But does it come in boxers as well as briefs?

    --
    âoeAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
    1. Re:Styles by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      But does it come in boxers as well as briefs?

      I, for one, won't be satisfied until someone produces a banana hammock based on this technology.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:Styles by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      How are you going to fit that in your pants?

    3. Re:Styles by asukasoryu · · Score: 1

      Now I have to start wearing underwear? That's it, I'm out of here!

      --
      There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
  5. Great... by chaodyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now I have to worry about my underwear invading my privacy too? That's it, game over.

    1. Re:Great... by Kenoli · · Score: 1

      Doesn't it sort of do that anyway?

    2. Re:Great... by chaodyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But at least I didn't have to worry about it reporting status to some outside observer - imagine walking into a store... "Welcome to S-Mart, sir - by the way, your underwear is reporting a slight stretching in the elastic - you may want to visit isle 3 and pick up some new ones. Oh, and we're having a special on weight-loss products in isle 5..."

    3. Re:Great... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Is Chaodyn trying to tell us that when he wears underwear, it is not pressed up against his privates?

    4. Re:Great... by chaodyn · · Score: 1

      You caught me.

    5. Re:Great... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As long as Facebook and AT&T don't get involved we're probably OK.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    6. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Will this new underwear teach you how to spell rudimentary words like "aisle" or is that too much to ask?

    7. Re:Great... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I see a market opportunity: underunderwear.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Great... by chaodyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Um, S-Mart is a big store. They don't have aisles, they have isles - you get a small motorboat when you enter instead of a cart to get to all the different isles. Duh.

    9. Re:Great... by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      You forgot the inevitible SONY rootkit...

    10. Re:Great... by spazdor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This was an incredible recovery. Mods, reward this plz.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    11. Re:Great... by spazdor · · Score: 2, Funny

      But as under-underwear gets smarter, we have the same issue and we'll need under-underwear!

      I think the solution here is obvious, guys. How do you keep different layers separate in a way that preserves privacy and access privileges?

      middlewear.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    12. Re:Great... by Anon1072 · · Score: 1

      Agree, "Epic Recovery" should be a new /. achievement.

    13. Re:Great... by drkim · · Score: 1

      I don't know why - but a crotch located "SONY rootkit" sounds really painful...

  6. Don't make me use my digital pants! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Digitial paaaants..... ACTIVATE!

    1. Re:Don't make me use my digital pants! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been looking to try and find the flash video for this forever.

    2. Re:Don't make me use my digital pants! by Forge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Three Dead Trolls in a Baggy absolutely rule.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    3. Re:Don't make me use my digital pants! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been looking to try and find the flash video for this forever.

      Here

      They are all located on their home page anyway.

    4. Re:Don't make me use my digital pants! by JustABlitheringIdiot · · Score: 1

      Go Go Gadget Tighty Whiteys!

  7. Gives new meaning to the phrase... by smitty777 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I'm here for the debriefing sir.

    --
    "Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
    Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Gives new meaning to the phrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm here for the debriefing ma'am.

      There, fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Gives new meaning to the phrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you've been keeping up with this, but there's this whole new thing where they have FEMALES in the military now? Try to keep up now, m'kay?

  8. Did George Jetson have these? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Seems they were up for a Good Spacekeeping Seal of Approval - before Jane found they had to be Dry Clean only.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  9. 2G features by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    The next version will activate the self-cleaning system after it hears the sound of an artillery barrage.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  10. The underwear has three modes... by boneclinkz · · Score: 0

    Heat, cool, and massage.

  11. Unfortunately by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    These are completely useless for commandos.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Unfortunately by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... or Scottish Highlanders.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Unfortunately by markass530 · · Score: 0

      Yea, and most of the guys I know went commando in iraq, so I cant really imagine the Military issuing a stupid order like "wear underwear", I mean that would take a real jerk in charge... Oh wait, i'm glad I got out

    3. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that this was a joke, and this is probably TMI, but what about those of us who choose not to wear underwear? I really can't stand wearing underwear at all (have tried boxers, briefs, and boxer-briefs...hate them all, although boxers were the least offensive), and don't own any anymore. I can't be alone on this. (Can I?)

      Is the military going to start requiring troops to wear these? Wouldn't it make more sense to put these sensors into some other type of garment that is less annoying to wear in warm and/or humid environments.

    4. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or your mom when the rent is due.

    5. Re:Unfortunately by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      My mom IS a Scottish Highlander, you insensitive clod!

      [gives AC one wi' the heid]

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  12. Lindsay? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Funny

    or even measure blood alcohol levels

    While one might immediately see value in a product like this for Lindsay Lohan, keep in mind she rarely wears underpants.

    1. Re:Lindsay? by rah1420 · · Score: 0

      >>keep in mind she rarely wears underpants.

      Is this apocryphal, is it something she's admitted, or do you have direct knowledge? Inquiring minds and all that.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    2. Re:Lindsay? by Flea+of+Pain · · Score: 1

      While one might immediately see value in a product like this for Lindsay Lohan, keep in mind she rarely wears underpants.

      Pics or it isn't true!

      --
      Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
    3. Re:Lindsay? by yukk · · Score: 1

      or even measure blood alcohol levels

      While one might immediately see value in a product like this for Lindsay Lohan, keep in mind she rarely wears underpants.

      Yeah, I know. That's just what we need - another reason for drunk guys to take their pants off. "Shit man, you're too drunk to drive. Your underwear will block the ignition ... " "Yeah, not a problem !" *Rrriiiip* "Okay, I'm good, let's walk to the car."

      --
      The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you're still a rat." Lily Tomlin
  13. Nothing to see here by NetNed · · Score: 1

    So they will be able to tell what soldiers handle the action better judged on if they shit themselves or not? And all remotely? Is there anything technology can't do?

  14. Fecal Material Sensor? by nweaver · · Score: 1

    Does it also include a fecal material sensor hooked up to the radio, so the underwear can automatically call for help in a "crap your pants" situation?

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  15. will it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    come with its own software including a version of clippy?

    "i see you are pissing, would you like help with that?"

  16. drugs? by Mechanik · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The designers also hope that one day the underwear can release drugs to relieve pain and treat wounds.

    Or how about Viagra when they sense foreplay? That would make a hojillion dollars. Add in a mild heater to combat shrinkage on those cold nights, and you have yourself a winner.

  17. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idle is indeed pants?

  18. Interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this technology can be used in an alcohol sensing underwear application for remote enforcement of certain criminal sentences. Ah, who am I kidding, Lindsay Lohan doesn't wear it often enough to be effective anyway. Making a pair she had to keep on 24/7 would probably kill her.

    AAAAHZING!

  19. Emission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it measure methane emissions?

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. HEV suit/underwear? by auntieNeo · · Score: 1

    Beep beep. Major fracture detected. Morphine administered. Warning: user death iminent. Seek medical attention.

    Heh, I will forever associate the HEV suit with the rope elevator on the Lost Coast level.

  22. Wedgie. by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see the readings off of a pair of these things when someone got an unexpected wedgie.

    Also interesting, it seems this could be the first step towards a suit of medical power armor. Who'd have guessed that such a great item would have started inside your pants?

    1. Re:Wedgie. by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      One other interesting idea...if you really want to get these things into the mainstream, work with the sex pill companies to rig up a pair that can inject a sex-enhancement drug on command. Nothing would get these babies into mainstream public use like the promise of an on-demand erection.

    2. Re:Wedgie. by greenlead · · Score: 1

      Heh, "babies."

    3. Re:Wedgie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about if they jerked you off? Could make for some humorous situations if some had a faulty pair going off at random.

  23. Interesting Distinction by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Didja read that the officers' version of the Medical Briefs can actually read more vital signs than the enlisted version? Yeah, it's not because officers' lives are more important or anything, it's just that it's easier for the Medical Briefs to read pupil dilation when the officer in question has his head up his ass.

    --
    "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  24. Oh the possibilities by vgbndkng · · Score: 1

    Tethering to your partner. A little WiFi. A virtual hotspot. Endless.

  25. Go Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go Go Gadget Tighty Wighties?

    1. Re:Go Go by hguorbray · · Score: 1

      oblig IT Crowd quote: Goddamn these electric sex pants!

      I'm just sayin'

  26. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big deal. 23 years ago I developed a pair that could monitor nocturnal emissions. Around the same time my girlfriend devloped a pair that could determine with 99.38% accuracy if she was menstruating.

  27. Mods beware by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

    It seems posting "idle is pants" is 100% on-topic today.

  28. Huh Huh, His name is Wang... by zardozap · · Score: 1, Funny

    Obligatory Beavis and Butthead reference....

    1. Re:Huh Huh, His name is Wang... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Abu Ghraib reference ...

      Talcum powder and fresh batteries on Wednesday.

  29. Stupid idea by jklovanc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here are the reasons why it is stupid.
    1. Would need to be able to withstand multiple wash cycles. Washing machines are very hard on electronics and sensors.
    2. Each person would require multiple pairs of underwear as very few people wash cloths every day.
    3. Difficult to replace medications. (Take off your pants. I need to add insulin.)
    4. Trans dermal meds are generally low dose. If a soldier needs pain meds I doubt that enough could be administered.

    A much better idea would be an arm band that is worn under clothing.

    1. Re:Stupid idea by Shompol · · Score: 1

      They should make it a "Smart Suppository" instead.
      Don't need to change or wash it.

      Other functionality ideas:
      5. Can administer an electric shock for disobeying commanding officer/head nurse

    2. Re:Stupid idea by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Here are the reasons why it's brilliant from the point of view of a military contractor:
      1. Damage by wash cycles means that the military will keep needing to buy more of these things.
      2. Each person requiring multiple pairs will ensure that they need to buy a lot to start out with.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Stupid idea by matfud · · Score: 1

      And having to do a systems check on your underwear each morning to ensure they are still working.

      Hah login check was "starched" and I would not fancy that either.

    4. Re:Stupid idea by sponga · · Score: 1

      5. When the IED goes off and it everything on your body burns, it will melt into and mend with your skin.

  30. How about washing them? by jandrese · · Score: 1

    My first thought is: If all of these fancy pants (literally!) biosensors make it so you can't just toss them in the wash, then I don't want it, especially on underwear.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  31. Semper ubi sub ubi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is all.

  32. Why underwear? by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

    Seriously, why attach all that tech to the piece of clothing that requires the most frequent washing?

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  33. Interesting but ... by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 1

    what else can they monitor?

    I think we always receive a "vertical" look at the benefits (I.e., monitor blood pressure, heart rate, etc), and these are good in combat. Along with IPv6 addresses on just about all "elements" on a soldier (I.e., smart gear, location equipment, gps, etc), this adds another element of real-time combat monitoring and has a huge potential to monitor/save lives.

    But, are we being told everything they can glean with these wondrous new underpants?

    --
    L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
  34. Caution: Reference For Old People Only by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

    "Close B Close mode"
    "His pants are gone!!"
    "Kid! What did you do??"

    1. Re:Caution: Reference For Old People Only by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 1

      "Prepare Shift Simulfax for human form"
      "Prepare mirror clone"
      "Clone me"
      <passwd: illegal entry>
      "Clone me, Doctor Memory!"

      --

      I bought this house and you know I'm boss
      Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

    2. Re:Caution: Reference For Old People Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will Mr. Uh Clem please report to security.

  35. oh god, not more waistband nonsense by RapmasterT · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Right off the bat I can tell you this entire possibility is being posited by someone who never spent a day in uniform. The waistband is the worst possible place for this, from a practical perspective.

    Reason being, a fully uniformed soldier already has at his waist line:
    underwear
    undershirt
    pants waistband
    pants belt
    blouse tail
    pistol/equipment belt

    when a soldier already has six layers converging at his waist, adding wiring/sensors is not going to be popular. The sensation of peeling embedded underwear waistband out of sweaty flesh is not a positive one.

    1. Re:oh god, not more waistband nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Confirming this. When I wore them many of us called our BDUs combat pajamas because they were very comfortable to wear. There were however two places that could get rather uncomfortable. The first was the foot in general due to boot fitting and in our case blousing of the trousers (which still beats the pants off tucking). Those were minor compared to the waist. You've got the belt for one. There's the side adjustment brackets that could get painful. There's having to keep your undershirt tucked in and usually when it comes out you don't have time to properly tuck it back in so instead you get bunches of fabric rubbing against your body. And wearing a belt on top of a blouse on top of a belt on top of buttons (no zippers) can get mighty uncomfortable. At least in those cases you have underwear generally protecting your skin from the worst of it.

    2. Re:oh god, not more waistband nonsense by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Pure speculation: maybe it was done on purpose, to ensure a good sensor-to-skin connection?

    3. Re:oh god, not more waistband nonsense by npsimons · · Score: 1

      Right off the bat I can tell you this entire possibility is being posited by someone who never spent a day in uniform. The waistband is the worst possible place for this, from a practical perspective.

      Well then I'm sure they'll hear about it real quick. I'm willing to bet, though, that the reason they chose the waist is that measuring BP is easier there; commercially available HRMs go across the chest and don't do BP. But I'm willing to bet it's fairly easy to relocate the sensor, if only they can get readings (say, the upper arm? I'm no doctor). Don't be such a naysayer; this kind of thing could save lives. It sounds like it's still in development anyway, not like all soldiers are going to be required to wear them tomorrow.

  36. First Calvin Klein Cologne, now this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before you know it, science will have successfully completed their goal of weaponizing Marky Mark

  37. Ok wait by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

    Let me put on my Smarty Pants ... Has a whole new meaning

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
  38. really smart? by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

    The idea of smart underwear is actually quite dangerous. The smart part would rely on software. It's one thing to do measurement, but it's a whole new ball game to give software the control to release medicine into the body. I don't think there would some nice UI to prompt you for permission when a certain drug is injected in you.

    1. Re:really smart? by aicrules · · Score: 1

      The confirmation dialogue is audio-based. You confirm that you want the drugs by punching the OK button which is conveniently located in front middle. They're not sure yet if they want a double punch or a single punch though.

  39. And does it wash well? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about the wisdom of putting expensive "smarts" into a garment that gets changed/washed a lot. Wouldn't it be better as a belt?

    Or maybe the military don't change them as often.

    OTOH this is Slashdot, I'm seeing mystified faces when I say "changed/washed" in the same sentence as "underwear".

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:And does it wash well? by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about the wisdom of putting expensive "smarts" into a garment that gets changed/washed a lot. Wouldn't it be better as a belt?

      That was my first thought as well. Wouldn't it be better to not have electronics in your laundry? A detachable waist band/arm band/strap would have been much logical... unless of course, the point is to collect vital data without the knowledge of the wearer....

      Or maybe the military don't change them as often.

      apperantly...

  40. Smart also means privacy issues abound by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    because if it can determine what needs to be done it can record the event. What can be recorded can be reported. While the idea of this underwear leads to some mirth it should be acknowledged than any article of clothing can be modified to help the individual as well as monitor and report. While in the context of the infirm and elderly this can provide a boon to hospitals and homes we will need to look at how the information is distributed and kept safe from prying eyes.

    Throw in concerns about proper disposal, liability, and reclamation of said clothing as well. While the innovation is a great idea the related issues will need to be addressed.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  41. How about... by marto · · Score: 1

    Stillsuits WTF!

    1. Re:How about... by snowboardin159 · · Score: 0

      from dune?

  42. First Toilet Seats... by greenlead · · Score: 1

    ...Now briefs? You thought the thousand dollar toilet seat was bad, just wait til they start selling the government this new special underwear. If they dye them black, they should at least be able to sell them to the "tacti-cool" crowd: They'll buy anything!

  43. Ball game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a whole new ball game

    Is that an attempt at humor? :D

    1. Re:Ball game? by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      Actually no. But now that you mentioned it...

  44. So the other side can just use a scanner to find s by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    So the other side can just use a scanner to find soldier just my looking for there 100% of the time transmits?

    Nice way blow some ones cover.

  45. How about for MLB players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inject steroids as pitch is thrown, inject HGH as runner tags from third.

  46. Re:The mormons have had these for years by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    Centuries, plural? It's just been 180 years.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  47. Step 2 finally revealed! by ggambett · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Steal underpants
    2. Upgrade them with high-tech devices and sell them to the military at 10x their original cost
    3. Profit!!!

  48. Wang has been working on this for years by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    He shared his strategic plan with me years ago; it sounds like he has filled in a crucial missing step:

    1. Collect underwear
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

  49. So why weren't these used... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in Operation Enduring Freeball?

  50. Wireless tech with the ability to release drugs by russ1337 · · Score: 1

    The designers also hope that one day the underwear can release drugs to relieve pain and treat wounds.

    lets hope the enemy don't develop the tech to wirelessly/remotely activate the drug release.....

  51. Re:The mormons have had these for years by treeves · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, you wouldn't say "1.8 century", would you? It'd be 1.8 centuries.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  52. smart waistband/belt makes more sense by peter303 · · Score: 1

    You dont have to wash them that often. You dont have to make many sizes, etc. And it could be a chestband or armband too.

  53. Other War Uses by no1home · · Score: 1

    1) The leg holes can automatically become tourniquets when excessive blood loss is detected from a leg.

    2) A sensor that can tell when a team or individual is ambushed- it senses urine.

    3) Chastity belt (nobody should be having sex whilst in the midst of a combat situation)

    4) Shock 'collar' for prisoners (kinda like an individually installed taser to keep them from doing stupid things that would otherwise get them or our guys hurt)

    5).... the list goes on....

    (Oh, some are meant to be funny, other could work; you decide which are which!)

    --
    I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

    Persecutors will be violated!
  54. Drugs in my underwear? by f3rret · · Score: 1

    Sensors and stuff I can see, that'll be useful. Now painkiller dispensing underpants, that just sounds scary, will that lead to a sudden influx in junkies stealing underwear in the hope that it'll be filled with delicious opiates.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  55. "usaca" by Jeian · · Score: 1

    Just in case, you know, somebody was confused about whether "California" referred to the US state or the city in El Salvador.

  56. Fitted desert-fashion? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Will the new underwear recycle urine and feces for desert warriors?

    "He will know your ways, as if born to them..."

  57. Is it a coincidence? by Jedimstr397 · · Score: 1

    Hahahahaha, Dr. Wang....

    --
    This signature has The Force
  58. But Does It...? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    But does it release painkillers when your PETN underware bomb misfires?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  59. Don't ask don't tell? by greenjelly · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. another conservative ploy to hand out gaydar equipped underwear to combat don't ask don't tell...

  60. Yeah! by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    The designers also hope that one day the underwear can release drugs

    We hope too!

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  61. Wegies? by snowboardin159 · · Score: 0

    Will this product finally stop the user from experiencing wedgies when going into combat? Also, is auto skid mark removal a feature?

  62. Re:The mormons have had these for years by s2theg · · Score: 1

    Unless you're a lazy programmer(s).

  63. This underwear is so full of shit! by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

    As a diabetic and keen watcher of tech for said disease, I know the only way to monitor levels like this is with actual sensors stuck into your goddam skin. Yea that's a thin wire that has to sit under the skin (has to have access to blood). There are some things on the horizon most using small chip tech as a sensor. Now about medicine you have to have a good pump (think fake organ like artificial heart). This pump has to be uber tough for military use. And oh yea a pump needs a very large diameter tube to get those meds into your body. Really if we are talkin true control , there would be one tapped into your spine (or any huge arteries), one sub dermal, one inter muscular. So taking these off would rip a cluster out of you, unless they made a port like the Matrix. They could call it a mini-port to make you feel better but still... That's one pair of undies I would skip!

  64. Juicers any day now . . . by npsimons · · Score: 1

    1. Would need to be able to withstand multiple wash cycles. Washing machines are very hard on electronics and sensors.

    I'm sure they can either make it machine wash proof, or just make the electronic part removable. I have an HRM that has a removable/washable strap and I've heard of washable HRM sports bras.

    2. Each person would require multiple pairs of underwear as very few people wash cloths every day.

    Multiple pairs of underwear, one sensor module that snaps onto the underwear. Problem solved.

    3. Difficult to replace medications. (Take off your pants. I need to add insulin.)

    Or hey, just have a refill port that's easily accessible.

    4. Trans dermal meds are generally low dose. If a soldier needs pain meds I doubt that enough could be administered.

    They already have insulin pumps; this underwear combined with that and a few other advances will bring us juicers faster than you think.

    1. Re:Juicers any day now . . . by jklovanc · · Score: 1
      1. The article is about printing the sensors on the waistband; not a removable system.

      2. See 1

      3. "Easily accessible" under tucked in undershirt, tucked in shirt, pants, belt, jacket, armour and equipment belt could be difficult.

      4. Insulin pumps require a cannula and I doubt that it would be a good idea for every soldier to be stuck with a needle 24 hours a day.

    2. Re:Juicers any day now . . . by npsimons · · Score: 1
      1. 1) Who says they can't change it to be a removable system?
      2. 2) See 1)
      3. 3) Which is why they could have an extension tube.
      4. 4) Again, technology will improve; either "injection" will become possible without being "stuck with a needle" or development of implantable devices that only have to be refilled periodically will happen, or possibly both!

      "not possible", "stupid", "won't ever work". That's all I seem to hear from you. Things don't get accomplished with that kind of mindset. It may not be perfect, it may still be in development, but you can be sure that if it really *is* a stupid idea, it will never survive field use. The military is one place where the "end user" doesn't put up with bullshit.

  65. Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just hope they are machine washable

  66. there are two markers easily detectable by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and under combat conditions, they are likely to show up.

    "Captain, we have multiple INDICATIONS from squad Baker."

    "Send reinforcements and a gunship at once."

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  67. In other news... by Boawk · · Score: 1

    Depends leaks email addresses of 114,000 smart underwear users

  68. seriously? this has to be a hoax by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

    ... Joe Wang?! for a guy engineering high tech underwear?! And I suppose he is collaborating with joe mama, will hung, and mike hawk?!

  69. *Presses t on armband keyboard* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *tssssss* Ahhhhh Yeaaaaaaaaahhh! *runs 2x faster*

  70. AYBABTU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We envision all the trend of personalized medicine..."

  71. No underwear stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are stupid because infantrymen don't wear underwear. They'll rub your balls off on even a few-mile march. You gotta lube up!