The simple fact is, nobody cares about what you personally look at, that information isn't worth anything.
I wouldn't say that. The statistics of your personal clicks contains information about your habits and interests. That information is quite valuable for anyone doing targeted advertising.
Possible scenario: You visit some web site with advertisement. When your browser's request to load the advertisement comes in, the advertiser notes that it's from an ISP he has a contract with, thus it connects to the ISP to check the profile currently connected with the requesting IP address, and then selects an ad specifically tailored to that profile, i.e. to you. They could even select different ads for the same product based on the profile.
I think that's the advertisers' wet dream: Know exactly whom you target for each individual ad presentation, and make the ad as specific for him as possible. It's certainly not worthless to them.
Only in Germany. If you don't live in Germany, you might consider a trip to Germany taking your computer with you in order to legally format your hard drive. However I'm not sure if you can legally import the newly created FAT file system on your hard disk into your home country. But you can evade that danger by leaving it in Germany.
What will you do when the television police come to install your always on TVs in all the rooms in your house? Will you really use the hammer when it means going to jail?
Well, in that case, it's probably time to move to another country.
content may depend on user actions in a non-trivial way (i.e. if the page contains things like onclick or onmouseover, the dependence on the sequence of events occuring may be quite complex),
content may be requested by callbacks to the server (after all, that's what AJAX is all about), in which case I'm not sure it's a good idea for the search engine to execute it,
running a certain script might be expensive in time and/or memory,
by processing JavaScript, the search engine might open up itself to exploits.
Funny, really when the world comes to an end I don't think it will be robots. It will be commercials. I'm serious. But it will be commercials for robots!
No, you want it to run Windows. When it starts getting self-aware, it will just crash. And if not, you'll be glad for it to have enough security holes to fight it.
But how are you supposed to know exactly how something is going to run under this?
The semantics of that construct is well-defined.
Of course from the short description it's not entirely clear to me if the compiler actually implements that semantics, or simply relies on you to honor it (e.g. is it possible to call a non-sieve function from within a sieve function or block? In that case, the compiler cannot reasonably implement the semantics). There's a precedent for the second type of semantics: restrict.
But if the semantics is enforced, you know exactly what you get.
Is there any modern programming language which doesn't provide a sort function in its standard library? Because if you use that, the vendor can simply provide a parallelized version, and you don't have to compare if the vendor parallelized that function manually, or the compiler parallelized it automatically, of even a mixture of both.
Exactly. If this system ever comes online then hijackers will simply plan and figure out a way to disable the system. Its easier said than done, and probably very costly, but if you get the right hackers you can break into (almost) any system. Well, if they manage to break into the system, they would be stupid to disable it. Instead, they would reprogram it to fly the plane where they want. Imagine the situation: The plane automatically flies to the target, and there's nothing the pilots (or anyone else) can do about it.
Indeed, the highjackers might not even need to enter the flight. They may hack the program in advance, and activate it automatically at some predefined condition.
Which of course raises the question if it is possible to only do the redirection as root (after all, there's no reason why echo itself has to run as root).
No, I don't consider echo to be a security risk. It's just curiosity.
So Islamists allow you to avoid taxes by converting. Democratic governments force you to pay taxes even if you convert. However both don't tax you any more after you die. Thus obviously the Islamist position is better, because you can evade taxes while still alive.:-)
If I write some software which puts texts in Word format (it doesn't need to support any advanced features, not even formatting, so it shouldn't be too hard to do), then I own that software (because I've written it). This makes Word a circumvention device (the fact that MS has written it independently shouldn't matter; the AACS decryption utility was written independently as well), and therefore I can send the DMCA takedown notice.
Hmmm... if I "scramble" a text by putting it into MS Word format, and don't give anyone authorization to descramble it, and then "notice" that MS Word actually is able to descramble that text, can I then use a DMCA takedown notice against MS Word?:-)
Slashdot Mirror
I wouldn't say that. The statistics of your personal clicks contains information about your habits and interests. That information is quite valuable for anyone doing targeted advertising.
Possible scenario: You visit some web site with advertisement. When your browser's request to load the advertisement comes in, the advertiser notes that it's from an ISP he has a contract with, thus it connects to the ISP to check the profile currently connected with the requesting IP address, and then selects an ad specifically tailored to that profile, i.e. to you. They could even select different ads for the same product based on the profile.
I think that's the advertisers' wet dream: Know exactly whom you target for each individual ad presentation, and make the ad as specific for him as possible. It's certainly not worthless to them.
Only in Germany.
If you don't live in Germany, you might consider a trip to Germany taking your computer with you in order to legally format your hard drive.
However I'm not sure if you can legally import the newly created FAT file system on your hard disk into your home country. But you can evade that danger by leaving it in Germany.
Well, in that case, it's probably time to move to another country.
And how do you bookmark a certain view of that page (which, to you as page user, is a separate page after all)?
Sure. But since when do people do everything they should do?
I predict in five days it will be in Wikipedia.
Well, they are exactly 23. No wonder that he didn't spell out the exact number. Beware! Those are Illuminati extensions!
No, you want it to run Windows. When it starts getting self-aware, it will just crash. And if not, you'll be glad for it to have enough security holes to fight it.
The semantics of that construct is well-defined.
Of course from the short description it's not entirely clear to me if the compiler actually implements that semantics, or simply relies on you to honor it (e.g. is it possible to call a non-sieve function from within a sieve function or block? In that case, the compiler cannot reasonably implement the semantics). There's a precedent for the second type of semantics: restrict.
But if the semantics is enforced, you know exactly what you get.
s/compare/care/
Is there any modern programming language which doesn't provide a sort function in its standard library? Because if you use that, the vendor can simply provide a parallelized version, and you don't have to compare if the vendor parallelized that function manually, or the compiler parallelized it automatically, of even a mixture of both.
But you can get even longer: 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001
Indeed, the highjackers might not even need to enter the flight. They may hack the program in advance, and activate it automatically at some predefined condition.
You mean, just as they don't remove links from their search results due to political pressure?
Which of course raises the question if it is possible to only do the redirection as root (after all, there's no reason why echo itself has to run as root).
No, I don't consider echo to be a security risk. It's just curiosity.
So Islamists allow you to avoid taxes by converting. Democratic governments force you to pay taxes even if you convert. However both don't tax you any more after you die. Thus obviously the Islamist position is better, because you can evade taxes while still alive. :-)
No, all your TiVo belong to US (of A).
Well, given the number of different interpretations, there's only one possibility for its real meaning: everyone totally cconfused!
If I write some software which puts texts in Word format (it doesn't need to support any advanced features, not even formatting, so it shouldn't be too hard to do), then I own that software (because I've written it). This makes Word a circumvention device (the fact that MS has written it independently shouldn't matter; the AACS decryption utility was written independently as well), and therefore I can send the DMCA takedown notice.
Hmmm ... if I "scramble" a text by putting it into MS Word format, and don't give anyone authorization to descramble it, and then "notice" that MS Word actually is able to descramble that text, can I then use a DMCA takedown notice against MS Word? :-)
You have to log in to access the bacteria? What does the login procedure look like?
Well, fitness in evolution ist just your ability to survive and reproduce.