No. However I remember when they were called "applications" (and applications, daemons and all other types of executables were collectively called programs).
So maybe in the future you'll authenticate by playing a short game.
Boss: "Hey, what are you doing! I'm paying you for work, not for play!" Employee: "We temporarily lost the network, and now I have to re-authenticate." Boss: "Ah, OK, go on. However I wonder why we have so many network problems lately..."
No, an EM field doesn't interact with itself. You can see that if you try to deflect the beam of a flashlight with the beam of another flashlight: You'll not succeed.
Another field which does interact with itself is the QCD field, which is responsible for the strong force. Here the self-interaction is responsible for the fact that you cannot separate the quarks of a hadron.
Interestingly the section titled "Controversy" names only opponents of the concept of relativistic mass (doesn't sound like a controversy to me), and right above it there's a quote by Einstein himself speaking against the concept of relativistic mass.
And those people would not be programmers? I don't think it's a good idea to let non-programmers write procedures, stored or not. Especially if those procedures operate on critical data.
SQL and NoSQL are different, with different use cases.
No. Wrong. Clearly, $CHOICE is superior in all cases. If you think you've found a situation in which !($CHOICE) is better, you're obviously using $CHOICE wrong and should RTFM before you EVER say anything against it again, n00b.
Ah, but then you have to look at the implications of $UNRELATED_PROBLEM. After all, $CHOICE can't $BUZZWORD1, at least not without support for $BUZZWORD2.
Once $CHOICE supports those, then maybe it'll be better in all cases.
$BUZZWORD is totally overrated! It's $OTHER_BUZZWORD which counts! And only $CHOICE really supports $OTHER_BUZZWORD. Yes, !($CHOICE) formally also supports $OTHER_BUZZWORD, but that's no true support. Only $CHOICE has true support for $OTHER_BUZZWORD. And that clearly proves that $CHOICE is better.
Yeah, the most interesting paragraph was this one:
But there was one point that really stuck with me. He told me that when you start working at one of the stores, you have to sign an agreement that you won’t talk about it. First you go through training, and you can’t talk about what you did for training. Then you go through an initiation where you follow an experienced employee, and you’re not allowed to talk to any customers. Finally, when you are a full-fledged employee, you are absolutely restricted from representing Apple in any way outside the store. If you post an identifiable comment as an employee, you will be fired immediately.
That's an effect in matter which, as should be common knowledge by now, is composed of charged particles. The magnetic field doesn't affect the light, it affects the particles in the matter and thus the way those particles interact with light.
I guess anyone who thinks Wikipedia is ugly will also consider books ugly. Think of it: The typical book has a big, mostly uniform block of text surrounded by unprinted space except for a page number. Most books don't even have images (except on the cover).
Maybe they could even get a sponsorship from nuclear energy companies that way. It there's a business branch in need of positive press, it's the nuclear energy one.
Slashdot Mirror
No. However I remember when they were called "applications" (and applications, daemons and all other types of executables were collectively called programs).
Slashdot does allow editing posts. It's just that you have to edit it before you submit.
So maybe in the future you'll authenticate by playing a short game.
Boss: "Hey, what are you doing! I'm paying you for work, not for play!" ..."
Employee: "We temporarily lost the network, and now I have to re-authenticate."
Boss: "Ah, OK, go on. However I wonder why we have so many network problems lately
Hey, I've had a wireless optical mouse for years!
There are several things to do to be a successful rock band. Which part do you think is harder?
1. Playing music
2. Marketing
In the grand scheme of things, musicians are of little importance to the final product.
Let me guess ... you are working in marketing.
Why don't we ban [...] crime, since they are even more dangerous than magnets?
So crime is not already illegal in the U.S.?
No, an EM field doesn't interact with itself. You can see that if you try to deflect the beam of a flashlight with the beam of another flashlight: You'll not succeed.
Another field which does interact with itself is the QCD field, which is responsible for the strong force. Here the self-interaction is responsible for the fact that you cannot separate the quarks of a hadron.
A better Wikipedia article would be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativity
Interestingly the section titled "Controversy" names only opponents of the concept of relativistic mass (doesn't sound like a controversy to me), and right above it there's a quote by Einstein himself speaking against the concept of relativistic mass.
I prefer if the stupid are not able to use a car. It will make the roads much safer.
Wild dogs aren't exactly decimating native bird populations anywhere.
Yeah, they are notoriously bad at counting. Also, 90% of all bird populations aren't an exact multiple of ten birds anyway. ;-)
If this had happened this year, it would have been named Climateleaks.
What is webscale? Is Wikipedia webscale? Does Wikipedia use NoSQL?
What does Slashdot use? Is Slashdot webscale?
They are complimentary.
Really? My forks and spoons aren't very complimentary. Maybe I should send them to a training in good manners?
SCNR :-)
And those people would not be programmers? I don't think it's a good idea to let non-programmers write procedures, stored or not. Especially if those procedures operate on critical data.
I've been using NoSql data bases for a long time now. The one I use now is called ext4. It's great, and even came built into the OS.
Yeah, it even has stored procedures (they are called executables). And you can write those in any programming language you like!
SQL and NoSQL are different, with different use cases.
No. Wrong. Clearly, $CHOICE is superior in all cases. If you think you've found a situation in which !($CHOICE) is better, you're obviously using $CHOICE wrong and should RTFM before you EVER say anything against it again, n00b.
Ah, but then you have to look at the implications of $UNRELATED_PROBLEM. After all, $CHOICE can't $BUZZWORD1, at least not without support for $BUZZWORD2.
Once $CHOICE supports those, then maybe it'll be better in all cases.
$BUZZWORD is totally overrated! It's $OTHER_BUZZWORD which counts! And only $CHOICE really supports $OTHER_BUZZWORD. Yes, !($CHOICE) formally also supports $OTHER_BUZZWORD, but that's no true support. Only $CHOICE has true support for $OTHER_BUZZWORD. And that clearly proves that $CHOICE is better.
Yeah, the most interesting paragraph was this one:
That really sounds like some religious cult.
And the cost of training a new astronaut.
[..] and lighting a cigar with a 1000 Euro note.
There is no 1000 Euro note.
That's because he already lighted all of them. :-)
That's an effect in matter which, as should be common knowledge by now, is composed of charged particles. The magnetic field doesn't affect the light, it affects the particles in the matter and thus the way those particles interact with light.
For it to have been devalued you'd have to assume it had any value in the first place.
No, it can have negative value.
I guess anyone who thinks Wikipedia is ugly will also consider books ugly. Think of it: The typical book has a big, mostly uniform block of text surrounded by unprinted space except for a page number. Most books don't even have images (except on the cover).
At four people every two years, it will be a long time before Mars has 1.3 million people.
Maybe they could even get a sponsorship from nuclear energy companies that way. It there's a business branch in need of positive press, it's the nuclear energy one.
Maybe they will just use three sea shells.