Perhaps you never tried right-clicking and using save as? Sure, if you left-clicked on the torrent link and you didn't have the proper MIME association, then sure, ir wouldn't work with Mozilla - but it holds the same for IE.
Next time, try to use right-click instead of just assuming it's the browsers fault.
The portions of the 3dmark you mentione ddon't actually fit into the score. The only tests that factor into the score are the one's that involve FPS, to my recollection.
Re:Attractive Perpendicular force...Velcro mirrors
on
The Casimir Effect
·
· Score: 0
At a distance of 0, wouldn't the force be undefined? Atleast, from the equation that's what I gather. 1/0 = undefined.
Also, perhaps I do not understand your scenario, but wouldn't the perpindicular side, |-(where - is the perindicular side), on its end have a surface area, if mirrored, would react with the plate it's perpindicular to? That sounds awkward; let me try again: the very end of the - would be attracted to the |, causing Casimir forces between the two.
I don't think that it would swing into a V-shape, since the article stressed that the surfaces had to be basically perfect for it to result correctly.
There was an article in Scientific American entitled "15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense", which covers the 15 most misconstrued aspects of Evolution, and defends them.
Here is an exceprt, which seems pertinent to a lot of posts on here already:
"1. Evolution is only a theory. It is not a fact or a scientific law.
Many people learned in elementary school that a theory falls in the middle of a hierarchy of certainty--above a mere hypothesis but below a law. Scientists do not use the terms that way, however. According to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), a scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses." No amount of validation changes a theory into a law, which is a descriptive generalization about nature. So when scientists talk about the theory of evolution--or the atomic theory or the theory of relativity, for that matter--they are not expressing reservations about its truth."
People who are arguing that Evolution is just theory, do you argue with math as well? Pythagorean theorem, theory of relativity, etc. Are those not true, also?
FUll article here.
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps you never tried right-clicking and using save as? Sure, if you left-clicked on the torrent link and you didn't have the proper MIME association, then sure, ir wouldn't work with Mozilla - but it holds the same for IE.
Next time, try to use right-click instead of just assuming it's the browsers fault.
The portions of the 3dmark you mentione ddon't actually fit into the score. The only tests that factor into the score are the one's that involve FPS, to my recollection.
At a distance of 0, wouldn't the force be undefined? Atleast, from the equation that's what I gather. 1/0 = undefined. Also, perhaps I do not understand your scenario, but wouldn't the perpindicular side, |-(where - is the perindicular side), on its end have a surface area, if mirrored, would react with the plate it's perpindicular to? That sounds awkward; let me try again: the very end of the - would be attracted to the |, causing Casimir forces between the two. I don't think that it would swing into a V-shape, since the article stressed that the surfaces had to be basically perfect for it to result correctly.
There was an article in Scientific American entitled "15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense", which covers the 15 most misconstrued aspects of Evolution, and defends them. Here is an exceprt, which seems pertinent to a lot of posts on here already: "1. Evolution is only a theory. It is not a fact or a scientific law. Many people learned in elementary school that a theory falls in the middle of a hierarchy of certainty--above a mere hypothesis but below a law. Scientists do not use the terms that way, however. According to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), a scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses." No amount of validation changes a theory into a law, which is a descriptive generalization about nature. So when scientists talk about the theory of evolution--or the atomic theory or the theory of relativity, for that matter--they are not expressing reservations about its truth." People who are arguing that Evolution is just theory, do you argue with math as well? Pythagorean theorem, theory of relativity, etc. Are those not true, also? FUll article here.
Real Genius. One of Val Kilmer's finest works!
Princess Bride.