Slashdot Mirror


Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling (Again)

joe094287523459087 writes "some guys used liquid nitrogen cooling via a cardboard tube to get a 20,000 3D Mark score. you can see the frost forming on everything - wouldn't the moisture from the condensation kill the board?" The Muropaketti guys had already done this with their microprocessor. Apparently the next step was to speed up their graphics card to match.

195 comments

  1. Fabulous by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure the soldered joints have no problem at all with the MASSIVE and abrupt temperature changes here.

    When can we expect this on fuel cell powered laptops?

    1. Re:Fabulous by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Hmm...nah I would be more worried about the interconnects and silicon inside the GPU and CPU to tell the truth.

      Lead as it stands works really well as long as it doesn't get too hot. Thermal impeadance with cold means it will soak up more juice tho.

      Just a couple of random thoughts.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Fabulous by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Actually it will soak up less juice. If they could get it even lower down to superconductor temps (too low for liquid nitrogen) it would be even better. A chip does well when started cold and kept that way. Temp changes are not good.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    3. Re:Fabulous by Turbyne · · Score: 1

      FYI: Pure water is nonconductive. It requires certain impurities (e.g. salt, blood, etc.) to make it conductive. Condensed water is essentially pure water.

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    4. Re:Fabulous by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Good point, tho I can't remember if copper and silicon in their current manufactureing forms can be used as a superconductor. Also, when you get something down that cold without proper resistances, remember that the GPU's and CPU's are manufactured to spec for voltage impeadance as well. Running at stock voltage, at super cold tempatures could burn them out as well. Maybe someone with more time and money then myself can look into this.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Fabulous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pure water is nonconductive. It requires certain impurities (e.g. salt, blood, etc.) to make it conductive.

      Blood? Is there any particular reason you included that on the list? I don't plan on making any human sacrifices over my computer anytime soon...

  2. The title says it all... by Lxy · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling

    Sorry, but this is high school physics.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:The title says it all... by evacuate_the_bull · · Score: 0, Troll

      Insensitive clod! Some of us never had high school physics!

      --
      Satanists get good grades too...suspiciously good grades
    2. Re:The title says it all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try elementry school physics...

      I remember the teacher brought in Liquid Nitrogen in 4th grade to do stuff that seemed quite incredible to the pyrotechnics among us...

    3. Re:The title says it all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the teacher brought in Liquid Nitrogen in 4th grade to do stuff...

      were any of you kiddies thirsty at one point during his demo and decided to find out what liquid tastes like?

    4. Re:The title says it all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R u 1 of those home shooled kidz?

    5. Re:The title says it all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theoretically, the Leidenfrost effect would protect you if you put liquid nitrogen in your mouth...why don't you try it? :-p

    6. Re:The title says it all... by mojowantshappy · · Score: 1

      Actually, it has more to do with chemistry.

      --

      This page was generated by a Barrel of Circus Midgets, and that is the way I like it!!!

    7. Re:The title says it all... by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      Why is this 'high school physics.'?

      I can say that....
      Air is mainly nitrogen.
      Gas at 20 deg c has 26 moles per decimiter cubed, I don't know what it is for Nitrogen vapor at -100 - degs.

      I don't know the spacific heating capacity of air or nitrogen vapor (the amount of energy required to raise x moles of y by 1 deg) 'not quite high school physics, though I could work it out'

      Ok so is fairly obvious, but there's a lot more than plain old 'high school physics' to think about.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    8. Re:The title says it all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nevermind the fact that the guy who wrote that article accidentally had a small drop of the liquid nitrogen hit his front teeth, completely shattering them

    9. Re:The title says it all... by photon317 · · Score: 5, Funny


      Chemistry is just a mislabelled branch of physics :)

      --
      11*43+456^2
    10. Re:The title says it all... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Everything is just a mislabelled branch of physics.

      Why is this music pleasing?..... insert very long answer here which has been derived using physics.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    11. Re:The title says it all... by khuber · · Score: 1

      they didn't shatter, it created fissures, jeez -Kevin

    12. Re:The title says it all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gas at STP has 1 mole per 22.4 liters, not 26 moles per liter. Big difference. Gas, for all practical purposes, has no density. Liquid nitrogen, on the other hand, has a density. I don't know what it is, but I know it's way more than gas. It's also at a lower temperature, which further increases the density. Liquid nitrogen will absorb way more heat than air.

      I don't what all this talk about high school physics is, though. This is high school chemistry.

    13. Re:The title says it all... by Turbyne · · Score: 1
      Gas, for all practical purposes, has no density
      1.225 kg/m^3 at sea level. Since when does aerospace engineering have no practical purpose?
      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    14. Re:The title says it all... by ZigMonty · · Score: 2
      You were modded funny but you are completely correct.

      Chemistry is just the physics of electron shells (among other things). Biology is just the chemistry of organic molecules (at its heart anyway). Psychology is just.. well you get the picture. Physics is about finding the fundamental theories of the universe. Everything is physics by definition.

      Of course, sometimes the link between physics and a higher level abstraction is poorly understood. For example, human behaviour is just the firing of neurons and so should be explainable by physics but we aren't even close yet.

      I'm not suggesting that we get rid of these higher level sciences. Anyone who's programmed in assembler will realise that abstractions are important.

    15. Re:The title says it all... by photon317 · · Score: 2


      I used to program in assembler, and I wish more people still did. Actually my ideal programming language is now "C++, but don't use templates, polymorphism, or multiple inheritance - dont bother with the STL unless it's a very clear win - and profile your code and recode any super-hot-spots in asm". I guess what I really want rather than C++ is C with just a few C++ features - like member functions for structs, private declarations, operator overloading, and constructors/destructors.

      My point is, abstractions sometimes go a bit too far.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    16. Re:The title says it all... by ZigMonty · · Score: 2

      Maybe you should have a look at some of the embedded subsets of C++. For example, drivers for Mac OS X are written in a subset that removes most of the stuff you mentioned. IIRC, all that is left is single inheritance and member functions. Constructors and destructors are also left out. new just allocates. You then have to call init() on the method to do the setting up. This is in line with Objective-C, and it isn't so bad. It reduces some of the complexity too.

  3. Not necessarily, if it's -196 C by koko775 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    wouldn't any condesnsation freeze before it could short the electronics?

    1. Re:Not necessarily, if it's -196 C by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Obviously, it did freeze before shorting anything out. They would have to shut it down upon exhausting the coolant, so as not to overheat. Therefore, the condensation from the melting ice would not harm the board as there would be no power applied.

    2. Re:Not necessarily, if it's -196 C by dattaway · · Score: 2

      I work with electric forklifts that are freezer duty. The circuit boards see freeze/thaw cycles of 0F-100F on a regular basis and get drenched.

      How do we protect them and the wires? Silicon grease. Without that grease, 36 volts can burn and smoke a wet circuit board. Considering it works with hundreds of $20,000 fork lifts, I'd try this on your N2 powered turbochared motherboard.

    3. Re:Not necessarily, if it's -196 C by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Are you sure it's not "silicone" grease?

      (Sorry - my pet peeve; I go nuts when I hear about "silicon" breast implants or "silicone" chips)

    4. Re:Not necessarily, if it's -196 C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A memory enlargement with silicone chip implants?

    5. Re:Not necessarily, if it's -196 C by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

      Until it rusts of course....

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
  4. somebody beat him to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's so special about him getting 20372 by overclocking his P4 to 3916 MHz?

    The article has a picture showing that someone got 21504 by overclocking to 3998 MHz -- nine days earlier.

    1. Re:somebody beat him to it by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      because this is slashdot! and because holicho doesnt usually provide too much stuff for english speaking people(duh, like muropaketti did). i'm just wondering if this is a repost..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  5. mostly tiny ice crystals from the fast cooling by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The boiling point of nitrogen is miles below the freezing point of water, so in the immediate vicinity you'd have some fast chilling and ice crystals. I'd be more worried about liquid condensation further away from the cpu, if it lowered the internal temperature of the case for example.

    Unless they're venting vast quantites of boiling nitrogen into there though, it shouldn't be too bad. Plenty of hydrophillic stuff ariund should deal with that. A few sugar cubes in there, or some conc. sulphuric acid maybe!

    1. Re:mostly tiny ice crystals from the fast cooling by primal39 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that condensed water would be pure h20, and thus be non-conductive.

      --
      Eschew Obfuscation
    2. Re:mostly tiny ice crystals from the fast cooling by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nearly pure water, since droplets tend to form around particles of dust, so over time it would gum up whereever it was condensing/settling on.

  6. Not the sharpest pencils... by Pedrito · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it me, or is that guy pouring liquid nitrogen with his bare hands? Is he aware of the danger of getting that stuff on his hands?

    1. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by bjschrock · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, if you touch liquid nitrogen for just a short amount of time, you won't hurt yourself. The heat from your hand vaporizes the liquid nitrogen that actually touches you, so you have a small air pocket between you and the liquid nitrogen... of course, if you hold it for more than a fraction of a second, it won't feel too good. One of the professors here actually poured some liquid nitrogen in his mouth and spit it on the wall during one of my classes, and he did it quickly enough not to hurt himself.

    2. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by g4dget · · Score: 2

      There isn't much danger if you get it on dry skin; it will just harmlessly bead up and roll off. When people wear gloves, it's mostly to protect themselves in case some glass container breaks. However, if it soaks through clothing or if you take it internally, it can be dangerous.

    3. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by kenthorvath · · Score: 2

      Scalding hot coffee has a similar effect, and yet I pour that straight from the pot every morning - without gloves! He's not exactly going to soak his hand in the stuff, and a small amount will just evaporate off of the skin. Coffee actually is more dangerous to a certain extent....

    4. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by scott1853 · · Score: 3, Funny

      One of the professors here actually poured some liquid nitrogen in his mouth

      And people complain about Jackass and Beavis & Butthead setting a bad example for our children?

    5. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by Alranor · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's fairly safe, as long as you don't swallow it.

      If you're stupid enough to do that, like this guy , then you're well on your way to qualifying for a Darwin Award.

    6. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the professors here... Anything to keep the twenty-somethings awake during class.

    7. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno. I saw my Physics professor do this twice. To date, I haven't run out and tried it yet... maybe it was because he told us "Look. Just never try this. Trust me."

    8. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by kidlinux · · Score: 2

      No danger what so ever. In my first year (university) Physics lab, we got to play with some Liquid Nitrogen. I held my fingers in it up to the first knuckle (would have been deeper, but we just had small styrofoam cups) for at least 5-10 seconds. The Nitrogen boils around your warm fingers for a while, before they start cooling down enough for the liquid to come in contact.
      Even if that happened, it would take a while longer before you'd be in danger of loosing your fingers. You might suffer from some blistering or frost bite, but that would heal.
      Liquid Nitrogen is actually used in direct contact with skin as a treatment for warts. It's not really that dangerous.

      --
      -kidlinux.
    9. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by ckedge · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Heh, yup. I had to watch a friend in 4th year physics dunk his fingers into and out-of liquid nitrogen really fast a few times before I was brave enough to try it myself.

      As advertised, the flash-boiled liquid nitrogen insulates your fingers for a fraction of a second. You can't keep doing it though, lest your tissue cool down too much, and who knows *exactly* how slow/fast you can do it without injury, and no-one was willing to try and find out :)

    10. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by Zzootnik · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did that in a college science demonstration... The liquid is vaporized before it actually makes contact with your skin...Pretty neat, actually...the heat you radiate is plenty to change the phase of the stuff....

      Umm...I guess I should say something about "don't try this at home" as I didn't major in a hard science, and your mileage may vary...Basically, Don't freeze your hand off by plunging it into a vat of nitrogen, dumb-asses (for those who need this warning...)

      --
      Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
    11. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      This works for both super-cool and super-hot substances. I know the hot end is called the Leidenfrost effect, and I imagine the cold end is the same effect, just with your hand functioning as the (relative to the cold stuff) super-hot surface. Just as impressive as the liquid-nitrogen-in-mouth experiment is the wet-hand-in-molten-lead demonstration, which is just as safe.

    12. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by beens · · Score: 2, Informative
      I went to smart camp when i was a youth, and in my physics class we spent an entire day playing with liquid nitrogen. You can actually hold it in your hand for quite awhile, provided you keep your hand open wide enough that your palm doesn't crease. As long as the LN doesn't get trapped between two folds of skin, you will be fine. Ditto for your mouth. You can hold a fair amount in your mouth, under your tounge with your tounge up and back. If you keep air flowing across it, you look like you're breathing smoke. When you spit it out, any remaining evaporates almost instantly.

      We spent hours playing like this, and of the 20 of us in the class, not one was injured.

    13. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by srslif16 · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I know two friends who used a bottle of LN2 to cool their office. They put the bottle on a high shelf, and after a while it got cooler in the office. Then, they got a headache when the oxygen levels started to drop, and then they opened the window to flush out the nitrogen and get in the oxygen - together with the 40C warm outside air. Then, they refilled the bottle...

    14. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      I've worked in labs that use liquid helium. Basically, we use liquid nitrogen to get things down pretty cold so that we don't waste any helium. We really don't care about the nitrogen. We pour it out and after you've been there for a few days you don't even notice it splashing around. You don't do anything stupid with it... but it's just not a problem.

      Liquid helium, on the other hand, is some crazy shit. We always use gloves when transfering helium, and we try to keep it as isolated from the atmosphere as possible.

      If it might sound cool to do liquid helium cooling on a CPU, forget it, it's not worth it, especially if you don't REALLY know what you're doing.

    15. Re:Not the sharpest pencils... by fjordboy · · Score: 2

      even more fun is using liquid nitrogen to freeze natural gas or propane. I remember having some great fun using a bunsen burner hose and bubbling the gas through liquid nitrogen to cause the natural gas to become liquid. After we had about half a cup of liquid natural gas, we went into a dark hallway, lit it on fire and poured it out. It was pretty neat, it looked like liquid flames rolling across the floor and up the walls where it hit. Recreating the expirement later, I managed to get some on my jeans..however, after a second or so the liquid burned off and there was no burning on my jeans (I assume it is similar to alcohol and the gas is what actually burns...).

      Just proves that you can play with fire and liquid nitrogen at the same time.

  7. Frost everywhere by sdflkgfljdqshgjkqsfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, so the Radeon has frost over most of its circuits. Is that dangerous for the said card? frost tends to melt into ... well liquid right?
    I must be missing something, if someone could please fill me in...

    --
    how does one change his /. id?
    1. Re:Frost everywhere by kenthorvath · · Score: 5, Informative

      The water pulled from the atmosphere would be mostly deionized and non cunductive. Just like those old oil based cooling systems that you actually submerged your components in and ran through a refridgerator.

    2. Re:Frost everywhere by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1

      Liquid Nitrogen Cooling is only a short term solution. People who use it expect their components to be destroyed after a shot period of time.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    3. Re:Frost everywhere by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2

      Even deionized water is somewhat conductive because water is a polar molecule. Oil is a totally different story. Oil is non-polar. It doesn't respond to an elecric field at all.

  8. What's the point? by _avs_007 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    So you can some awesome performance. What's the point? Lets say the guy does some UT testing and gets dick hardening results. But isn't that useless if when you're playing the game, and:

    1.) The frost/condensation shorts out the board
    2.) You run out of liquid nitrogen, and the board fries itself, locking up the game.

    There is nothing like playing UT while worrying about filling up the liquid nitrogen. With my luck, I'd end up accidently pouring the liquid nitrogen directly on the board, causing it to fiercly boil, and I'd drop the dewar flask and get the shit all over my hands.

    Besides, the blazing speed of the graphics will probably do nothing for me, so long as I have to deal with flaky lag on my broadband connection.

    1. Re:What's the point? by Paladin128 · · Score: 2

      These guys are obviously just doing it for shits and giggles. The setup they have, without overclocking, should be far more than enough to play any current game at higher than acceptable framerates with all the options turned on, including FSAA.

      Is there any reason? Nope. Looks like fun though. If I had the cash to waste on stuff like that, I probably would.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    2. Re:What's the point? by romco · · Score: 5, Funny

      "...Lets say the guy does some UT testing and gets dick hardening results."

      That would mean he is putting the nitrogen in the wrong place....

      --
      AdFuel
    3. Re:What's the point? by kenthorvath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That LN will take a while to evaporate once the container it is in cools down sufficiently. Physicists use cold traps powered by LN all the time. In fact, a friend of mine built a cyclotron that uses a 40 Amp magnet and he cools it with LN. He checks on it daily. It's pretty effective stuff.

    4. Re:What's the point? by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 1

      To add insult to injury, not only are their methods totally impractical, but they don't even make a contribution to "science". Intel will release consumer chips that surpass that clockspeed in 6 months, anyway. Without ludicrous cooling systems that require liquid nitrogen.

      --

      --sdem
    5. Re:What's the point? by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

      Is there any reason? Nope. Looks like fun though.

      Looks like they're trying to get to the number one position on the MadOnion 3dmark chart. This time they made it to second place. Next time maybe they'll break the record. Yay for team Finland!

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    6. Re:What's the point? by Salsaman · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yeah I can see how this is technically cool, but you could just wait a few months and probably buy a 4GHz P4 off the shelf anyway.

      I mean Moore's law still trumps overclocking any day.

    7. Re:What's the point? by kenthorvath · · Score: 1

      Correction, the cold trap is powered via LN, but the magnet is water cooled.

    8. Re:What's the point? by mlrtime · · Score: 1

      Thats not the point... in a few months when you can buy a 4GHz P4 off the shelf, you will be able to OC it to 8Ghz, and then what? The cycle repeats itself.

      There is a reason why the OC market is live and well. I still remember going to 3dfxcool when I got my voodoo.

      -mlr

  9. Limiting factor by Paladin128 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The limiting factor in the performance of modern GPU's seems to be memory bandwidth. They were able to overclock the GPU itself a good bit, but not much on the video RAM.

    We really need to see more memory bandwidth saving technology on GPU's. ATI pushed ahead a lot of cool things (early Z, occlusion culling, Z-compression, fast Z-clear), but it's not far enough. The Kyro/Dreamcast use tile-based deferred rendering rather than immediate mode, and the GameCube's GPU (designed by ArtX, which is now a owned by ATI) uses a 2 MB on-chip Z-buffer cache which alleviates the need to go to video memory every time they want to do a Z-test (which is typically at least once per pixel). Given, the Cube doesn't ever have to deal with a frame buffer bigger than 720x480, so a fixed size Z-cache is much more useful there.

    On another note, I'd really like to see support for geometry amplification schemes (n-patch tesselation, displacement mapping, etc.) that work properly with stencil-buffer volume shadows.

    --
    Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    1. Re:Limiting factor by master_p · · Score: 1

      Another nice trick to solve the memory bandwidth problem is to have textures of lower color depth or with colors taken from palettes. I don't know if this is already supported, but each texture could be assigned a palette (4096 colors, lets say, that's 12 bits), and by use of shifting it could be textured on a 32 BPP screen.

    2. Re:Limiting factor by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 2

      I want to know why I can't put standard DDR memory on my video card. Why does a video card cost soooo much, just because of 64MB of memory, when memory prices are hitting the floor, even with DDR?

    3. Re:Limiting factor by dakoda · · Score: 1

      extending the busses to use standard ddr would probably change the electrical properties of the card's bus (which will require it to run at a lower speed perhaps). that, and if you have banks to plug stuff into, you have chances to have variable loads (depending on whats plugged in and what isnt), which makes the bus specs need to be a bit wider still.

      looks like they keep it simple(short, direct traces, no extra loads, etc), and let it go a bit faster (though im not sure how much room they have before they really run into problems).

  10. Liquid N colder than air.. wow! by verch · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been doing some experimenting myself and I'm almost ready to post my 'steel is stronger than cardboard' article. Who would have guessed?

    This is cool in some horribly over the top manner, but I think the last cooling using liquid nitrogen story a few months back covered it.

    1. Re:Liquid N colder than air.. wow! by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      On other news, U.S. nuclear scientists discovered that ASCI White simulates nuclear explosions much faster than a guy wielding a slide rule...

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  11. Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling (Again) by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Hehehehe, DUH :-)

    That aside, Liquid Nitrogen might be a bit of overkill here. When properly coated, I'm sure the parts are safe from the damaging effecets of melting, but everyone needs to remember one thing, heat is the enemy, it's obvious that it would take quite a bit to get too cold.

    Obviously there isn't a future in Liquid Nitrogen cooled computers, but take the idea back from the "weird science" to the new liquid/radiator idea. I do believe silent machines running cooler with liquid cooling, will become a new trend.

    Lastly, why does everyone brag about their 3DMark scores? If you suck at gaming the extra pixels sure ain't gunna help ya.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling (Again) by Hal-9001 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      When properly coated, I'm sure the parts are safe from the damaging effecets [sic] of melting, but everyone needs to remember one thing, heat is the enemy, it's obvious that it would take quite a bit to get too cold.
      Melting is not the danger here. At high temperatures, the dopants used to make regions of silicon p-doped and n-doped (which make the transistors on your CPU which do the computing) start diffusing out of the regions they're supposed to be into the regions they shouldn't be. Enough of that happens, and your many-transistor CPU becomes one large, expensive resistor. Incidentally, I think a similar problem delayed the use of copper interconnects--the copper would diffuse into the silicon and poison the transistors, so copper couldn't be used until IBM found a way to prevent that from happening.

      As far as being too cold--as long as no thermal shocks are involved, I don't think there's such thing as too cold. I look forward to /. stories about liquid helium cooling and the like... ;-)
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    2. Re:Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling (Again) by SB5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      1899 "Everything that can be invented has already been invented.", Charles H. Duell, director of the U.S. Patent Office

      1943 "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.", Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM.

      1949 "Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons.", Popular Mechanics, forecasting the relentless march of science.

      1957 "I have travelled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people, and I can assure you that data processing is a fad that won't last out the year." The editor in charge of business books for Prentice Hall.

      1965 Moore's law published by Gordon Moore in the 35th Anniversary edition of Electronics magazine. Originally suggesting processor complexity every year the law was revised in 1975 to suggest a doubling in complexity every two years.

      1968 "But what ... is it good for?" Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM commenting on the microchip.

      1977 "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp..

      1980 "DOS addresses only 1 Megabyte of RAM because we cannot imagine any applications needing more." Microsoft on the development of DOS.

      1981 "640k ought to be enough for anybody.", Bill Gates

      1992 "Windows NT addresses 2 Gigabytes of RAM which is more than any application will ever need". Microsoft on the development of Windows NT

      Stolen from http://www.ox.compsoc.net/~swhite/history/timeline -QUOTES.html
      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    3. Re:Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling (Again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lastly, why does everyone brag about their 3DMark scores? If you suck at gaming the extra pixels sure ain't gunna help ya.

      I always assumed it was along the lines of boasting about your car. U know what they say about guys trying to make up for certain accomadations?

      For the record I drive a Metro and my 3dmark score is 3,500.

    4. Re:Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling (Again) by caveat · · Score: 2

      I don't think there's such thing as too cold.
      well...if you cooled the system enough, something in there would probably start superconducting, and while SC is very useful if you've planned for it, it could really screw things up if you hadn't (i.e. if your copper substrate suddenly loses all resistivity, that's gonna mess up your processor).

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    5. Re:Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling (Again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greater 3D performance means that at any given time, what you see on the screen is more likely to be an accurate representantion of the game world.

      If you're shooting at where someone was two frames ago, you'll miss.

      So yes, a better score wont help a crap gamer, but a worse score can and does hamper a good gamer, depending on the systems you're competing against.

      This doesn't mean a good gamer on a bad machine will lose, but it does lower their advantage.

    6. Re:Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling (Again) by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      Since metal is only used for interconnects, and silicon (which does not superconduct) is used for everything else (resistors, capacitors, transistors), I can't see superconductivity being a problem. Usually when you design circuits, you want your interconnects to be perfectly conducting, so superconductivity would be an unexpected benefit.

      Just as a fine point, the substrate of most chips is just undoped silicon, and the electrical characteristics of silicon only improve at low temperatures.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  12. No, it's Slashdot. Expect the minimum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oohhh, let's hate the MPAA! Hey look, LOtR stuff!!!

  13. Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No shit Sherlock.

    1. Re:Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      Keep digging, Watson.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  14. Next Step for these guys... by MarvinMouse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Build a compressor/cooler.

    If you could do it right, and can afford the proper parts to build it. Create a high-power compressor, and have it pipe super-cooled fluids continually through both processors. Therefore, you don't have to pour/buy liquid nitrogen everytime you want these results.

    The problem is that it costs a lot and is quite difficult to build a fast high-power compressor/cooler. If you guys can accomplish this, then I'll be impressed. Pouring liquid nitrogen onto stuff to keep it cool isn't really that exciting/impressive in the long run, since it is far to manual, and doesn't require much thought to come up with the idea.

    I am curious though, does anyone know of more fancy coolers for the processor that work impressively but don't require constant manual addition of coolant?

    --
    ~ kjrose
    1. Re:Next Step for these guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pouring liquid nitrogen onto stuff to keep it cool isn't really that exciting/impressive in the long run,

      If they hadn't poured that liquid nitrogen on there, you wouldn't have had your "amazing" idea. As for your "amazing" idea. You sound like an idiot.

    2. Re:Next Step for these guys... by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is:

      1. Use Liquid Nitrogen to cool processor
      2. Build a compressor/cooler.
      3. ....
      4. Profit !!!!

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    3. Re:Next Step for these guys... by AlaskanUnderachiever · · Score: 1

      VapoChill systems. I don't have a link but they're pretty damn impressive in what they can do.

      --
      Find out about my new childrens book: SS Death Camp Criminal Batallion Go To Monte Carlo For The Massacre
    4. Re:Next Step for these guys... by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure that real LN2 cooling systems (i.e. not a cardboard tube :-p) use a recirculating arrangement, so a single resevoir of LN2 is used to cool the chip. You can use a compressor to rechill it, or there are other methods. Personally, my favorite method of cooling is the Peltier effect. Basically, a voltage applied across a loop of two dissimilar materials will create a temperature gradient, i.e. one junction will get hot and the other will get cold. The result is a solid-state cooler with no moving parts that you could probably build on chip. The drawbacks are that Peltier coolers aren't super powerful, but to someone who is interested in unusual physical phenomena, that doesn't diminish their coolness factor. (no pun intended)

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    5. Re:Next Step for these guys... by chill_17 · · Score: 1

      on the same site!

    6. Re:Next Step for these guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just fuck off!

    7. Re:Next Step for these guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The profit joke is old and unfunny. Please stop.

    8. Re:Next Step for these guys... by jafuser · · Score: 2

      I'd imagine you'd probably need to put the whole computer into a vacuum chamber or something which removes humidity from the air, because after a while the frost buildup would be tremendous, and you'd have to occasionally defrost your computer, like we used to do with freezers =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  15. 1/2 the 3dmark tests not shown. by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Informative

    Checking out his 3dMark and you notice, fillrate, poly count, shader, spride speeds are missing. Also only 4x AGP, be nice to also see 8x AGP enabled, his motherboard might not support it yet.

    His ATI driver is also 6.13.10.6159, he should upgrade to 6193, major performance increase. You can get it over at rage3d.com

    Impressive thou, Double my 3DMark on a plain AMD 1800 with a ATI 9700.

    1. Re:1/2 the 3dmark tests not shown. by Paladin128 · · Score: 4, Informative

      8X AGP won't buy them anything here. What that mostly affects is AGP sideband addressing, which allows the graphics card to grab textures directly from RAM without going to the CPU. Seeing as all of the textures in UT2K3 and all of the 3DMark stuff can fit in the 128MB of RAM on the graphics card, this is mostly irrelevant.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    2. Re:1/2 the 3dmark tests not shown. by kidface · · Score: 0

      The portions of the 3dmark you mentione ddon't actually fit into the score. The only tests that factor into the score are the one's that involve FPS, to my recollection.

    3. Re:1/2 the 3dmark tests not shown. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the only thing this liquid cooled experiment showed me, was that overclocking the bus and the cpu helped his score. So if the bus was 200mhz and the cpu was 4ghz you would see this score regularly.

      The only thing that is odd about the industry now is they are not pushing memory speed more, and the PCI bus more. Take for example the P4. They went from a 100mhz bus to a 133mhz bus and went straight to the top of the pack for a bit. Yet the bus is STILL 133mhz. For a cpu that is 2.5ghz. That is an amazing disparity. Nearly a 19x multiplier. The PCI standard is even worse at 33mhz. Almost a 77x multiplier. Forget talking to those cards. In some cases your talking HUGE wait states. I understand they are quad pumping the bus which gives you the effect of a faster bus, but not a real faster bus. Memory is still MUCH slower.

      We will not see interesting bus/memory changes until large chunks of memory is integrated right into the cpu. Perhaps with several cpus in the one die. Why do we have a L1, L2, LX cache system. Simple memory is slower. Well we can get some higher speed memory but on a bit of it and it is expensive. What if all we had was 'high speed' memory? L1, L2 cache is not needed. Wait state is not needed becuase the memory runs at the same speed as the cpu. Chunks of the CPU are no longered needed to 'manage' cache. You can put the memory controler in its place. The bus goes from 133mhz to the speed of the cpu. Oh sure most of the code is run out of about 200KB of the whole memory. But think about this. Open task manager or top (if your using linux) and look at how many processes are running. Its probably over 20. Those are context switches. Woopsy there goes any chance at cache coherency. ALL those 20 programs need 200 or so KB. You need at least 20 times the amount of cache available these days. Just because of context switching. Woops add in threads. Default XP probably has 100+ threads running. The cache flush + cache line fill + cache write back is all the memory controller does these days. Yet we may be beating the wrong dead horse! Think how simple the MB would become.

    4. Re:1/2 the 3dmark tests not shown. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Epic has said that with highest detail textures and charachter shadows enabled in high resolutions 128megs is not enough for everything to reside in video memory on the larger maps in ut2k3. As I understand it though, you just barely run out of room with several players on screen with shadows and very little of the agp reserved system mem gets used so there is very little performance hit. But it is interesting that they are pushing past 128megs already.

    5. Re:1/2 the 3dmark tests not shown. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't enable 8XAGP... that's the amazing downfall of these great new ATI blunders, they boast 8XAGP but when you actually set them to 8 the card fails to work or, even better, your board fails to post. ATI claims they had no idea and are working on a fix. Nvidia is working on a fix too... it's called the NV30 core.

  16. Cooling by Omkar · · Score: 1

    If these people are so serious about verclocking and cooling the board, why didn't they devise some sort of automated liquid N2 delivery mechanism. The guy is pouring the N2 with his bare hands! Any info on the cost per minute?

  17. Actually ... by bizitch · · Score: 1

    Looks like an experiment in freezing duct tape ....

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  18. It's just you. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    It's not all that dangerous to work with. Certainly if you dunked your hands in a quantity of it, you could do some seriously serious damage..... but even if you spash some over your hand, it won't do much, especially if they are dry. You can stick a blob of it in your palm and carry it around even... just by swirling it a little. The lN2 that comes in contact with your skin vaporizes instantly, forming a gas layer between the liquid and your skin...

    Gloves worn during these experiments I think are more because of the other things that might get really cold while working with the lN2, or breakable...

  19. Avoiding condensation by XNormal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Run the whole thing in an improvised glovebox filled with dry nitrogen gas at slightly higher than ambient pressure. Boiling liquid nitrogen results in large quantities of totally dry nitrogen gas.

    Now the only problem remaining is how to avoid condensation on the glovebox itself so you can see what's going on inside :-)

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  20. LN2 and condensation by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Interesting
    wouldn't the moisture from the condensation kill the board?

    Well--eventually, maybe. But what they've build is essentially the back half of a water distillation system. The water that condenses out of the air will be very pure, and have a very low conductivity. (The resistance of a 1 cm path through ultrapure water is on the order of 18 meg--that's ohms, not byes--so it probably conducts no more electricity than the plastic of the board.)

    Yes, the condensate will eventually pick up contaminants, and at the edges of the cooled region where liquid water is free to flow you're likely to have problems. The solution would be to keep the entire mainboard in a dry environment. Seal it in a box with only an inlet for LN2. The little bit of water in the box will condense out (on the N2 fill pipe rather than the board if you remove a bit of insulation) and as the LN2 boils off, the box will be filled with dry, inert nitrogen. As an added bonus, this will help suppress fires.

    --
    ~Idarubicin
    1. Re:LN2 and condensation by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      The water that condenses out of the air will be very pure, and have a very low conductivity.

      I'll second that...

      One of the most amazing trade show booth demos I've ever seen was a water distillation system. They had computer monitors running a demo while under water. I know the why and how, but still, just plain unnerving to see high voltage stuff working like it was dry.

    2. Re:LN2 and condensation by dattaway · · Score: 2

      ...and as the LN2 boils off, the box will be filled with dry, inert nitrogen. As an added bonus, this will help suppress fires.

      I'd be careful about something condensing into the liquid nitrogen as it boils off. Like oxygen. Liquid oxygen may start to get concentrated over time into the mix and create an interesting condition known as rapid oxidation. Some people might call it combusion. Others may describe it as an spectacular explosion.

      If liquid oxygen can set a highway on fire (to bad that famous tanker scene in Terminator wasn't O2, not N2,) imagine what it can do to a computer in the privacy of your own home.

    3. Re:LN2 and condensation by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      I'd be careful about something condensing into the liquid nitrogen as it boils off. Like oxygen.

      Worth noting, definitely--but not likely to be a problem. As long as LN2 is flowing in to the box, and the box is not perfectly sealed any oxygen that was inside when the box was closed will be slowly flushed out. I imagine that most hacks assembled from /. posts aren't quite airtight, so the concentration of oxygen in the gas mix will decay exponentially with time.

      Also, since only the GPU and CPU are directly cooled with LN2, the rest of the board will stay warmer, limiting problems with O2 condensation.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:LN2 and condensation by Tycho · · Score: 2

      Are you sure it was water they used? It may have been fluorocarbons which in liquid form look like water and are nonconductive.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    5. Re:LN2 and condensation by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      They were selling de-ionizing purifying (etc) water equipment. They claimed it was water... course, I've done enough trade shows myself to still wonder. (grin)

    6. Re:LN2 and condensation by jafuser · · Score: 2

      They should have put a tap on it to offer drinks to potential buyers =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    7. Re:LN2 and condensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dip the PC in CFC.

      THAT should get rid of a lot of problems, partly since chloroflorocarbons(sp?) don't conduct. Come on, let's start burning some ozone holes while we're still under the Bush administration. It's the only time we can get away with doing anything so unethical.

  21. Conductance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ice doesn't conduct electricity.

    They hopefully let the board dry out for a few days, so it can warm up and dry out.

  22. it's a shame... by mattbland · · Score: 1

    that I can't do something similar to my DSL connection and get 3Gbps instead of 1Mbps :-)

    --
    /usr/bin/awake/too/long
  23. Captain Obvious on Line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Liquid Nitrogen Beats Air Cooling (Again)

    In related news:
    Ice is colder than Steam
    Touching hot things will burn you
    You can skate on ice
    Lots of fire will make things melt
    The speed of light is very fast

    1. Re:Captain Obvious on Line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of fire will make things melt

      huh..yeah.. heh heh heheh .. yeah .. melt .. huhhuhuhuhu .. HA HA HA HA MELT!!! fire.. FIRE!!!!! **FIRE**!!! MELT!! HA AH HA HA AHAHAHHA

      *go ands gets a lighter and a gasoline can*

  24. Crap. by ActiveSX · · Score: 0, Redundant

    These guys must have balls the size of watermelons! I'd never be able to do something like this.

    1. Re:Crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These guys must have balls the size of watermelons!

      That's something I don't want to imagine

  25. dont drink while playing with hazardous materials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stay away from the dewar's while pouring liquid nitrogen on your video card, man

  26. Not frost by pz · · Score: 2

    That's not frost you see, but chip outlines silkscreened onto the board. These are used by manufacturers to ease asssembly (eg, capacitor C32 goes here, resistor R98 goes here, chip IC42 goes here, etc.).

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:Not frost by ForceOfWill · · Score: 2

      I don't know about you, but this (9th image from the top) sure looks like frost to me.

      --

      --
      Seeing is believing; You wouldn't have seen it if you didn't believe it.
    2. Re:Not frost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you even look at the article? its pretty fucking OBVIOUS everything is covering in frost. do silkscreens stick out in little crystals, and cover the tubes the LN is poured through? i'd like to know how the manufacturer got that to happen.

    3. Re:Not frost by pz · · Score: 2

      You're right. I hadn't been able to load the later images due to /. effect.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    4. Re:Not frost by pz · · Score: 2

      No need to be rude. I saw the upper figures and didn't manage to load the lower figures until a second viewing of the article after the first fellow replied with a little more tact.

      But, then I suppose you didn't bother reading my reply to his comment before writing yours, now did you?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    5. Re:Not frost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, ASS!

  27. High school physics? by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Funny

    More like common sense.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  28. Space Cooling... by WeaponOfChoice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have the guys on the ISS (or indeed any space mission/station) ever used the 'cold hard vacuum' of space to get their systems running cool and fast. You don't have the problem of condensation, you could make the sink a great big copper array (being very, very sure to always keep it out of the sun) and you'd enjoy even better performance (it's only about 3 Kelvin out there...).
    I guess you'd run into problems with cosmic radiation - but nothing a good dose of shielding wouldn't fix. Placement would also be an issue, couldn't just pin it to the back of the station...

    Anyone know of any experiments along those lines?

    --


    It's not that I'm Anti-American - I'm Pro-Freedom
    1. Re:Space Cooling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what carries your heat off into space?

      Your systems would overheat even more than the would on Earth.

    2. Re:Space Cooling... by driftingAimfully · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I know almost nothing about all of this. But I do have a thermos flask. Sure it keeps my beer cold, but it also keeps my soup hot. I think space is a lot like a thermos flask, only a lot, lot bigger and less prone to break.

    3. Re:Space Cooling... by WeaponOfChoice · · Score: 2

      And what carries your heat off into space?

      That great big copper sink I mentioned.

      --


      It's not that I'm Anti-American - I'm Pro-Freedom
    4. Re:Space Cooling... by WeaponOfChoice · · Score: 2

      The vacuum of space prevents the sink losing heat through conduction, it does not prevent heat loss through radiation.

      The thermos works to minimise all main energy transfers, the vaccum deals with conduction, the silvered surfaces with radiation etc.
      For a good desc. of how a Thermos Works go here.

      --


      It's not that I'm Anti-American - I'm Pro-Freedom
    5. Re:Space Cooling... by driftingAimfully · · Score: 1
      God damn it, you're right. But I was right about one thing:
      > I know almost nothing about all of this
      See? ;-)

      What about evaporation? Doesn't really apply to a copper thing, but would a liquid evaporate really quickly or really slowly? And would that mean that the cooling effect would be more or less? (In other words, a wet cat will get cooler more quickly than a dry cat. But will a wet cat in space get cooler even quicker (ignore the effects of the fur - assume, for arguments sake, a hairless cat. And ignore medical problems associated with a vacuum - I guess there's have to be some sort of mask.)
    6. Re:Space Cooling... by pclminion · · Score: 2
      And what carries your heat off into space?

      Radiation. How do you think they cool things in space?

      It's a trade-off. In air, heat can be taken off by conductive transfer: heat goes from heatsink into air, then the air flows away. However, in air, radiative cooling is not as effective because the air molecules reflect the radiation in all directions, and some of it goes back into the hot object. In vacuum you have no conductive cooling but there's nothing standing in the way of radiation.

      In vacuum, you want a heatsink where all the radiative surfaces face out into space (not toward each other like a conduction heatsink), and the material has a high emmissivity (silver, gold are often used).

    7. Re:Space Cooling... by WeaponOfChoice · · Score: 2

      By the skin of my teeth really, running a PC in orbit really just gives you different problems for dealing with the heat (radiation is much less efficient than conduction so you need a big cooling fin) rather than any real advantage from the (perceived) cold.

      Many factor determine the speed of evaporation in space - primarily whether it is in the sun or not. In the sun it generally explosively boils away (nearly 250F) and in the dark it tends to freeze quite quickly.
      My gut feel is that you'd get colder fast if you were wet in space, though it would be the least of you (or your cat's) problems at the time...

      --


      It's not that I'm Anti-American - I'm Pro-Freedom
    8. Re:Space Cooling... by benh57 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Have the guys on the ISS (or indeed any space mission/station) ever used the 'cold hard vacuum' of space to get their systems running cool and fast.

      Yes, they do. They aren't experiments, they are in fact how the space station works. On the last mission they brought up 3 more ammonia radiators.

      These work by taking water which runs past the electronics, exchanging that heat to liquid ammonia, which out the truss, and through these huge metal radiators which then radiate the heat to space. They have to use ammonia because the water would just freeze if it went through the external radiators.
      More space station info...

    9. Re:Space Cooling... by Cerilus · · Score: 1

      Temperature is strange when you get into a significant vaccumm enviroment. Heat is the motion of molecules; but to measure temperature, you need to physically sense the molecules bouncing of your temperature probe.

      Because space has so few molecules per unit volume, you can't measure temperature very well with that method.

      Also, in space the vaccumm acts as an insulator, because there's so very few impacts of what's left of an atmosphere on your cooling surfaces.

      Heat sinks and fans are useless in space.

    10. Re:Space Cooling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Near-earth space is not as cold as you imagine, as earth and the sun provide the source of heat/radiation. Especially the earth fills up a half of the sky from near-earth satellite point of view. That's a huge light source that can warm up a body of a satellite. For instance, why do you think some IR observation satellite (astronomical)
      carries a lot of coolant like Ne or Nitrogen into space for cooling the detector, if the space is really at 3K?

  29. Safety first, kids! by tswinzig · · Score: 2
    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:Safety first, kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he'll get killed or lose the ability to reproduce by getting some of it on his hand? or perhaps you dont even know what the fuck a darwin award IS?

    2. Re:Safety first, kids! by tswinzig · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Trust me, if the guy is pouring liquid nitrogen from a foam cup with no protection whatsoever, HE WILL BE A DARWIN AWARD CANDIDATE NOW OR IN THE FUTURE.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:Safety first, kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're late to the party, dumbass. no he won't die if he contacts the liquid nitrogen. it'll create a cushion of air to protect his finger for a split second. After that he should run to a tub of warm, but not hot, water and soak the digit to prevent frostbite from killing more than a layer to two of skin.

    4. Re:Safety first, kids! by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful
      He has some measure of "protection" from the Liedenfrost effect -- if cold N2 gets on his relatively hot hand, it'll flash-boil and create a thin cushion of gaseous N2 that should protect his hand from the liquid to some degree. This can be demonstrated by a competent professional by pouring a small drop into the palm of the hand.

      Now, if his fingers slipped and the cup of N2 fell over his hand, he'd be out of luck... Wearing gloves in that case isn't enough protection, because the liquid will just run down the glove, under the cuff of the shirt, onto the arm. The best thing to do is manipulate the N2 dewar with a long pair of tongs...

      People have done dumber things before, like dousing their head in alcohol (to kill lice) then lighting up a cigarette...

  30. Not Very smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is violating every safety rule in the book dealing with Liquid Nitrogen. Click Here to see what I mean. Does he value his hand at all? Don't attempt this at home kids.

  31. Must be bloody cold in there by Subcarrier · · Score: 1

    If you suck at gaming the extra pixels sure ain't gunna help ya.

    Got to feel sorry for the opposition, though. The monsters must be freezing their asses off in there.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  32. Avoiding condensation ... wtih a tornado by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Centrifuge the liquid nitrogen/air stream and spin the ice crystals out, leaving very cold dry air.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  33. Stating the obvious by Subcarrier · · Score: 1

    Weird how guys who notice that someone is obviously stating the obvious get modded up to +5 for stating the obvious. Well, DUH!

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    1. Re:Stating the obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually when I point out the obvious and tell everyone I got "first post!" they mod me down. Obviously this guy got very lucky, or has multiple accounts.

  34. Afford the parts?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you could do it right, and can afford the proper parts to build it.

    That's a guy who continuously wastes processors and other hardware by overclocking them... you're asking if he couldn't afford to buy some proper parts for a compressor/cooler...!

  35. There's no by Kjella · · Score: 2

    Obviously there isn't a future in Liquid Nitrogen cooled computers,

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:There's no by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Uh...what?

      --
      ± 29 dB
    2. Re:There's no by SuperDuG · · Score: 2

      it's a moron thing ... obviously not being in tune with the moron world, we're at a disadvantage.

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  36. Moisture by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

    The moisture forming on the board is distilled water. It is about as clean as possible and has a very low electrical conductivity. It is mildly corrosive, but given that the only exposed metal surfaces are tin or gold, that is not a problem if the exposure is not too long.

    I would think that you need to immerse a board in distilled water for some weeks or months to get actual damage. Fans, HDDs and other moving parts are a different story.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted and ignored otherwise.
  37. Physics? by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 2

    OK, maybe i'm missing something, but at that temperature, wouldn't some parts be smaller than they should be and some larger? I'm pretty sure that the coefficient of thermal expansion of plastic != that of silicon != that of copper. And besides, if you consider silicon, its resistivity is negative, meaning it generally increases with temperature increase. (it may be positive, depending on how your teacher taught it.) So although cooling it would result in higher conductivity for the copper, wouldn't that put the silicon to sleep, effectively?

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:Physics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that the expansion of the molecules isn't that much to break the board apart like you are thinking. At most I bet the board would just be "pressurized" from the metal expanding in it.

    2. Re:Physics? by CMX · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say that the restivity is negative or positive. Rather, the electron mobility of elemental silicon increases as the temperature decreases. In doped silicon (such as you have in your CPU) or metallurgical grade silicon, electron mobility or hole mobilty increases as temperature decreases to a point, then decreases as the temperature drops further.
      There's a bunch of fun graphs over at http://www.ioffe.rssi.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/Si/elect ric.html for you.

  38. Apparently it works on servers too... by bobdotorg · · Score: 2

    It would appear that muropaketti.com's server is using the same technology to avoid the slashdotting meltdown that I fully expected.

    I can hear it talkin' smack right now - "Bring it on you /.'ers. Brrrr. Is that all you've got? Fsck it's cold in here. All your hits are belong to us. God Dammit!!!, when I was shipped here from California I knew Finland was cold, but this is just fscking ridiculous."

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    1. Re:Apparently it works on servers too... by Vade · · Score: 1

      Muropaketti.com is almost directly connected to a massive backbone. The hardware is provided by Soneraplaza which is owned by a big telecommunications company called Sonera. No wonder The Effect doesn't show up.

  39. 21504 3DMarks by hoyhoy42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It would suck to have wasted all of that time with ln2 and still not have the top score. http://holicho.lib.net/top/020912/020912.htm http://gamershq.madonion.com/hardware/halloffame/

  40. thieieief! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our supplier for LN2 was very kind this time and we received 20 liters of liquid nitrogen and paid only for 10 liters (25 euros).

    I think your supplier made what's called "a mistake" there...

  41. Liquid cooling by Alcoholist · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The next step is liquid helium I think.


    It's really, really cold.

    --
    Bibo Ergo Sum.
    1. Re:Liquid cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prediction...

      Next /. title:

      Liquid Helium is colder than Liquid Nitrogen (Again)

    2. Re:Liquid cooling by jweatherley · · Score: 2

      Yes, but if it gets too cold and goes superfluid then it'll start creeping up and out of its container - perhaps the guy in the photo had better start wearing his themal gloves if he tries He cooling.

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
  42. Environmental Limits? by kidlinux · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wouldn't what they're doing exceed environmental specifications for the chips?
    I looked around ati.com and intel.com, but couldn't find any specifications on what the upper and lower bounds are as far as temerpature is concerned. I recall seeing in most product specifications for electronic devices temperature limits, and I thought the lower was usually around -15 degrees celcius.
    Or does the temperature of the chips ever get that low? Do they hit some kind of equilibrium that keeps them from reaching their lower limit?

    --
    -kidlinux.
    1. Re:Environmental Limits? by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

      I don't think the chip is going to reach it's lower limits when the chip has been over clocked. It might reach the upper limit before it reaches it's lower limit.

  43. In Other News by Geeyzus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shoes beat top barefoot running speed

    Telephone more effective than tin can and string

    Umbrella proven more effective at staying dry than dodging raindrops

    Mark

  44. Pure water isn't very conductive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...it's contaminant salts, and basic electrolysis (not often an instant 'zap!' phenomenon, unless you're dealing with 110VAC or better).

    If you're adventurous, go dunk a 386 or 486 in a tray of water- just the motherboard and cards, nothing with wall-power going into it. See how many weeks it takes to die. (Took my Socket 7 board with a drippy peltier about 2 years, although corrosion on the CPU socket might've been what made it flaky for a good period prior. Silicone's a good idea.)

  45. Damn it by aufecht · · Score: 2, Informative

    And I just got a Pentium II 233MMX IBM ThinkPad and was hella excited about that. But seriously, why doesn't someone try out these experiments on a Linux system? I'd be curious to see the differences in performance. I'd do it myself, but as I noted earlier I just got a PII 233 Thinkpad so we know what my financial situation is.

  46. liquid nitrogen should be used for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i am glad to see liquid nitrogen is used to cool down the chip so it will become super conductor instead of carrying out heat generated by the chip because it has resistance... sigh...

  47. Thermal shock by panurge · · Score: 5, Informative
    Someone mentioned this. Forget the solder joints for a moment (though the pure tin used on some boards now will actually crumble after a time at liquid nitrogen temperatures) the contraction of the case of the CPU will put stress on the pins, and the temperature differential between top and bottom of the case will put stress on the die joints.
    Also, if I remember rightly, the actual drain currents of the transistors goes UP because the resistance is going down (which is why you can overclock, of course.)Although the lowered temperature means the tracks will not be damaged, there may be other effects of the increased current density in longer term degradation of the die. If there is track necking anywhere, this might be a potential failure point.
    You might also expect damage to the epoxy cladding of the graphics chips, as the contraction pulls the epoxy away from the filler. This could result in the epoxy eventually becoming porous and the system failing due to moisture penetrating the cladding, just like 6502s etc. used to fail before anyone realised that glass fibre filler could wick water in to the die.

    The answer is to follow Seymour Cray and sink the entire system in cold fluorinert, using the total loss nitrogen system, or much cheaper dry ice, to keep the temperature at a sensible -45C or so. But that wouldn't be nearly so spectacular, would it?

    This is all a bit like our local hot rodders who can't safely make it to the next town and back for fear the engine will blow up on them. Even so, it would be nice if Intel would release some of the data they doubtless keep on this sort of thing.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  48. Re:Yawn ... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    At least it's not another "Let's beat the dead horse about Microsoft!" article with 600 stale monopoly jokes.

  49. Watch a Thunderbird burn to death by ma++i+ude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Kind of to go with this, I found a (Finnish, sorry, but you can still look at the purdy pictures) page that has some interesting avi clips. These people got an infrared camera to do a few DivX clips on how the heat is distributed across the components. I like the first one best; they actually destroy an uncooled 1.4GHz Athlon Thunderbird. The CPU temperature rises to 300 deg C in about six seconds!

    --
    You can't shut us down! The Internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!
  50. Capacitors usely go bye bye by The+Moving+Shadow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When using rigour ways of cooling like just pouring LN over your board usually the capacitors give out first. Since they always attract moisture like crazy (remember those old radio's used to die because the capacitors were leaking electricity due to moisture in them?) there's always a small ammount of moisture in them. Now you don't want to have icecrystals forming in there. But still it's amazing what those boards can take. I have seen an old BX motherboard bent at an odd angle by someone pouring LN over it and still working. (Due to the immense temperature differences in the upper and lower side of the board the upperside folds inwards as material shrinks when the temperate is decreased) I guess the soldering is really done well. The same thing must have been happening at this chip btw. The underside of the GPU must have been warmer (a lot warmer) than the upperside so i don't want to even think about the massive ammount of material stress going in. ;) Well.... just keep up tweaking those GPU's and CPU's, it's always fun for us to watch.

  51. i'm not a chemist/physicist... by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but it seems like there should be some sustainable way of acheiving this kind of performance from these processors... could better cooling be acheived by increasing the pressure? anyone know how many atmospheres of pressure a P4 can handle?

    1. Re:i'm not a chemist/physicist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as their is no air inside the components or at least had a way to equalize, pressure wouldn't make much difference. Making a case strong enough to hold more than a few psi above normal would be the challenge. I drilled an old aluminum scuba tank to see how thick it was. The damn thing was over an inch thick! Those tanks hold about 3000psi. Imagine trying to take that rig to a lan party.

  52. He must have quick reflexes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if he did all that in a fraction of a second.

    Actually, if you touch liquid nitrogen for just a short amount of time, you won't hurt yourself. The heat from your hand vaporizes the liquid nitrogen that actually touches you, so you have a small air pocket between you and the liquid nitrogen... of course, if you hold it for more than a fraction of a second, it won't feel too good. One of the professors here actually poured some liquid nitrogen in his mouth and spit it on the wall during one of my classes, and he did it quickly enough not to hurt himself.

  53. Pure water..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actually pure water is a very poor conductor of electricity and seeing as how condensation is one of the ways to distill water I hardly see a reason for concern over the melting condensation. The only real concerns I would have over using nitorgen is mechanical failure do to contraction/expantion issues. My real question is why didn't they submerge the entire system board? The changes in temprature between the chips they were cooling and the the ones with just heat sinks had to be substantial and as we all know the temprature of a conductor affects it's resistance. Probably the reason they were having the problems they were.

    OBTW Seymour Cray is turning over in his grave if they have just discoverd what LN is real option for cooling computers.

    1. Re:Pure water..... by srslif16 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, pure water is a bad conducting media, but that is offset by all those dust particles and soluble chemicals on the components. You can perform an experiment: Get a bottle of RO-water (reversed osmosis, much cleaner than distilled water) and pour in on your moderboard while running the computer. Se it short out. This particluar experiment has been carried out a few years ago. It is possible that the motherboards have become much cleaner since then, but I doubt it.

  54. condensation by 0ddity · · Score: 1

    condensation won't do anything to damage the board, water has almost zero effect on low- voltage DC systems.

    1. Re:condensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that a) there will be capacitence issues and b) it's not a DC system. Signals are zipping back and forth at very high speeds.

  55. Why this might not have worked by bperkins · · Score: 2

    There are plenty of reasons why this would not have worked.

    1) The specific heat of LN2 is much lower than water. This means that although you can get it cooler, you might not be able to get away enough heat to make a difference, or it might form a vapor barrier that prevents the LN2 for cooling efficiently. My guess would have been that you needed to actively pump it or agitate it. In fact, you probably can get quite a bit more cooling this way. If you've ever pour LN2 on your hand, you know that it doesn't really do very much (unless you cup your hand). Try this with boiling water and see if it hurts or not.

    2) Since none of these components were designed to withstand low temperatures, there's a chance that something could have cracked. If there was something that had a vastly thermal expansion coefficient in the packaging and/or became very brittle (e.g. plastic), it could have just split open. Apparently that's not a big problem either. My bet is that they cooled it down pretty slowly before they turned it on.

    I think the condensation issue is not as bad as one might think. It takes quite a bit of ions in order for water to become very conductive. It might be worthwhile to rinse your board in distilled water before trying this, but you probably don't have to bother. Just don't pour any salt on your board and it should be OK.

  56. It's all about the home field advantage... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just wait till they hold the air cooling part of the contest on Neptune. Liquid Nitrogen won't be so smug then, I can tell you!

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  57. Cooling the whole board? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think you could cool the entire board with this, or would the board crack or something from the stress?

  58. In other news... by FIT_Entry1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    from the no-shit dept.
    The speed of light is found to be "really fast"

  59. Difficult by rebelcool · · Score: 2
    The radiator would have to be enormous to get cooling levels that one approaches on earth (this being of course, that heat transfers well into molecular mixes such as the atmosphere. Since space is a vacuum the only method of losing heat is radiation)

    I don't have any good hard figures on this, but it seems to me that if you want to cool something down that near absolute zero, you're going to need something a bit more active than a big radiator. In labs here on earth that sort of cooling can only be done on a nanoscopic level, generally using lasers to slow down atoms.

    --

    -

  60. And the purpose would be? by Tuffnut · · Score: 1

    I can see this has been performed for entertainment purposes, but its been done so many times before, what's the point? I hardly think your average Joe is going to have the fog of air flowing over his desk and the potential danger of sending his hand to a undesirably low temperature just so he can juice up his chips.

  61. massive quantities needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liquid nitrogen is perfect for cooling things down to ridiculous temperatures, and keeping them cold... provided you don't have anything pumping heat/energy into the system.
    Say you cool the chip down to a temperature of 100K. it's real easy to keep it there, as long as the heat used up in the boiling off of the nitrogen only needs to offset the heat being transferred in from room air.
    As soon as there's a lot of energy being pumped into the chip (you've turned on the computer), you'll start running out of LN real fast. Nitrogen has a low boiling point, true... but it doesn't take a lot of heat to boil it off. Check in a periodic table, and do the math... then check bulk-quantity LN prices. It's just not a long-term solution, not unless you have your own LN factory and can recycle (like a refrigerator would, except with more conventional fluids).

  62. Beowulf Cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine liquid nitrogen cooling a beowulf cluster.

  63. evil dewars by pyrrho · · Score: 0

    When George Bush talks of "evil dewars", I think this might be what he means.

    --

    -pyrrho

    1. Re:evil dewars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this was not over rated at 1 you bush lover! nothing wrong with loving bush.

  64. Condensation by maydog · · Score: 1

    The condensation does not pose an immediate threat to the electronics, for it is basically distilled water. There is not ionic content in the water to carry current. The water will freeze rapidly as well, ice does not carry current. The water may alter paracitic capacitances as its dielectric constant is different than air, this may have some effect on the oscillator circuits - but will not fry anything.

  65. Liquid Helium Beats Liquid Nitrogen by carboncopy79 · · Score: 1

    Liquid helium boiling point is lowest. And it is used to cool nuclear reactor. http://www.chemicalelements.com/elements/he.html Periodic table showing boiling point for all elements. http://www.chemicalelements.com/show/boilingpoint. html

  66. This water ISNT conductive ! by orion@axg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    from my knowledge, water created this way - ie condensation isn't yet ionised an doesn't have the ability to conduct electricity.

    if many of you know the celeron [tm somewhere], the ppga grid is visible from the top of the chip and I myself have had water covering every pin and moving it's way down the board just to test this very idea of water damage.
    [peltiers - not NO2] = P

    fyi no damage was incurred and I was damn suprised.

    --
    - We seek not the answers, but to understand the question.
  67. water != electrolyte by dreadknought · · Score: 2

    In all actuality, water is not an electrolyte. It's the minerals and elements in water which conducts electricity. This means that distilled water(condensation) does not conduct electricity, and therefore would not short out electrical equipment.

    --
    What you reap is what you sow
  68. I need more speed by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 1

    I think I'll carry down the fridge to my office and install my computer inside of it. Maybe I can
    squeeze some extra performance out of this slowpoke computer of mine.

    Seriously, the Finns ought to consider to installing all their hardware outdoors... after all, their
    winters are rather cold.

  69. Cold hard VACUUM by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    The last word means that convection and conduction are no longer options for getting rid of heat.

    Vacuum happens to be an excellent insulator...

    And when the station is in direct sunlight it heats up VERY quickly. You can expect temperature swings for something in orbit to go from freezing cold to burning hot - Often in the course of a few minutes.

    I was involved at school in designing a small satellite (See cubesat.org for a general description of this class of satellite) - I was (fortunately) handling the radio board, and wasn't one of the thermal guys. I felt sorry for them...

    During dark times, the satellite had to have small heaters to keep the batteries from freezing.

    20-30 minutes later in the orbit, the satellite's problem would be overheating.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  70. Not necessarily 300 degrees C by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    To get accurate temperature info from thermal images, you need to paint everything you're imaging. (Usually black - Get it as close to an ideal black body as possible). Otherwise, some colors are better radiators than others and will appear warmer on the camera at the same temperature.

    That said, even unpainted, a thermal camera can tell you, "Something is really heating up quickly... That isn't right..."

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?