Slashdot Mirror


User: Ohreally_factor

Ohreally_factor's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,865
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,865

  1. Not an acronym! on Randal Schwartz's Perls of Wisdom · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    At best, it's a retro-nym.

  2. Re:EDITORS SHOULD READ THE FUCKING ARTICLES on Publishing Exploit Code Ruled Illegal In France · · Score: 1

    What, and miss the dupes?

    Actually you've just hit upon the reason the dupe problem is so bad on slashdot. Obviously, the editors have each unchecked the boxes of all the other editors.

  3. Re:French Court: "Surrender Now" on Publishing Exploit Code Ruled Illegal In France · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you discovered this exploit then so can someone else.

    It's always best to assume that someone already has, before you did. Always look at the worst case scenario. Unfortunately, marketing is king in the tech world, so companies would rather give us the overly optimistic view than the worst case scenario.

  4. Re:French Court: "Surrender Now" on Publishing Exploit Code Ruled Illegal In France · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If a company doesn't fix a problem that's brought to their attention, published or not, they could be found negligent for damages as a result of that security hole.

    Read any good EULAs lately?

  5. Re:You just need to learn the Company Anthem... on U.S. Approves IBM/Lenovo Sale · · Score: 1

    If you hum a few bars, I'll fake it.

  6. Re:smart people think alike on Torvalds Switches to a Mac · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see what computer he chooses the next time he has to actually pay for one.

  7. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. on Torvalds Switches to a Mac · · Score: 1

    Not only that, my dear fitten, he started using this Apple hardware about a year ago. Unsurprisingly, it's now "NEWS!" at slashdot.

    Given the high level of Linus worshipping that goes on here (higher than even the Steve Jobs worshipping), it's odd that more slashdotters weren't already aware of this.

    I am somewhat reminded of the scene in Life of Brian when he loses his shoe while fleeing a crowd of would be worshippers, and the worshippers begin to argue over the meaning.

  8. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. on Torvalds Switches to a Mac · · Score: 1

    My dad, my mom, my wife and several of my friends

    Most people won't have access to you personally to set up with linux. Do you want to come over to my house and get me up and running in linux? Also, I'll be calling you frequently for tech support.

    Sure, this is a problem with windows as well, especially given all the problems with malware. Which is why I gave my dad an eMac. I honestly don't have the time to give him much tech support!

  9. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. on Torvalds Switches to a Mac · · Score: 1

    Maybe Linux is ready for the desktop, but the vast majority of unsophisticated users aren't ready for the Linux desktop.

  10. You made a good car analogy! (gasp!) on Torvalds Switches to a Mac · · Score: 1

    This is actually a pretty good car analogy (a rarity!), and it even holds up when you extend it slightly. I'll get to the extension in a moment, for now I want to explicate what I think is your point.

    Linux is ready for some people's desktops, but not for others. It's that simple.

    Just as some people like to tinker with cars, or even like certain cars that require extensive tinkering, some people like to tinker with their OS, and become quickly bored and limited by the proprietary OSes. I'm not thinking of junkers that remain in the road by means of baling wire, but of MGs, Jaguars, Muscle cars, Lowriders. Whatever. Some are highly customized, others just require mechanical skills and TLC. Also, there are those who like to machine their own parts (developers).

    In the corporate environment, it's cost effective because you can have a pool of "mechanics" (and you generally have such a pool anyways, for Windows), and you can standardize on the configurations to make the mechanics more efficient. (I think this is where the analogy starts to break down. Is having a standard configuration akin to making all your users drive in first gear?)

  11. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. on Torvalds Switches to a Mac · · Score: 1

    Stand back! I'm about to power up my web browser!

    Url? Check.

    Plug-ins? Check.

    Bookmarks? Check.

    OK, ready?

    Contact!

    Pull out the chocks! Fasten your seatbelts!

  12. Re:no conversion needed on Torvalds Switches to a Mac · · Score: 1

    Can you name a single big brand box maker that sells a "linux ready" PC for less than the same model loaded with Windows?

  13. Bad Links on CherryOS Mac Emulator Resurfaces · · Score: 1

    The last two links of the summary are fugged. One should be for the other, and vice versa. Don't editors check links anymore? Oh, I must be new here.

  14. Re:why would it be illegial? on CherryOS Mac Emulator Resurfaces · · Score: 2, Informative

    However, you do need to include the relevant copyright notices in the source.

  15. Re:Government ? on Who Will Pay For Open Access? · · Score: 1

    I need that $800 step ladder, because I left my $500 hammer on top of this $4,000 file cabinet.

  16. Re:Government ? on Who Will Pay For Open Access? · · Score: 1

    Which is why, if you're getting gov't funding, you want a block grant.

    More ideal would be a private endowment, and run the publication off of the interest.

  17. Re:Government ? on Who Will Pay For Open Access? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Heh. Yeah, I wasn't actually thinking of the current President when I wrote that.

    Why the hell not? Just insert "Creation" in front of "Science" and it's a green light.

  18. Re:Emergent Solution on Who Will Pay For Open Access? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This square peg should fit in this round OSS hole. I'll just pound on it a bit with my GNU/ Hammer. OSS is the solution to everything!

  19. Re:Never take for granted the rights.... on Aus. Gov't Considers Fines for Online Suicide Info · · Score: 1

    Does the First Amendmentment cover yelling "Jump!" on a crowded ledge?

  20. Dammit! on Aus. Gov't Considers Fines for Online Suicide Info · · Score: 1

    You beat me to it.

    11,456,324 Slashdotters didn't read the fucking article.

  21. Re:Instructions? on Harvard Business School: You Peek, You Lose · · Score: 1

    If Harvard knew that they were prone to such ethical lapses, then, no, obviously not. For instance, if any had a criminal record, and Harvard was aware of this, it's doubtful they would be admitted.

    Similarly, if they concealed such a record, and thereby gained admission, they would probably be expelled if the college ever discovered this.

    Of course this doesn't apply to certain remarkable men, such as sons of senators who will become presidents.

  22. Re:Curiousity killed the cat... on Harvard Business School: You Peek, You Lose · · Score: 1

    Luckily, you had an alibi, an your dog was able to vouch for you.

  23. Re:Disaster Averted, US Business Community Saved on Harvard Business School: You Peek, You Lose · · Score: 1

    I wish I was bitter enough to believe in a "privileged class". It would make life so much easier to be able to blame someone else for all my problems.

    You kids today are so impatient. Give it time, you'll get there. Back in my day, we weren't in such a rush to become cynical. We knew it would come at the right time.

  24. Re:Deserved on Harvard Business School: You Peek, You Lose · · Score: 1

    Put on your tin foil thinking cap and cogitate for a moment. We'll wait.

    Yes, the "anonymous hacker" was none other than Kim Clark!

  25. Re:I for one on Arm Wrestling Robots Beaten By A Teenage Girl · · Score: 1

    Not sure what a cooming girl would be like

    You'll just have to wait for the launch of www.hot-illiterate-teen-erotic-robot-crushing.com

    It will be much hotter than www.badrobots-andthe-teenies-wholovethem.com