I purposely buy motherboards with ps/2 port for my black 122 key model M. Hope that's still possible as next year my four year upgrade cycle (I buy a "barebones") comes around
SystemD fires off more processes, and moreover parallel starts services (which can be good thing, but that can be done with init style sytem too, long solved problem)
You talk out of your ass, admining init on those is solved problem. You are the one with no knowledge and no experience.
The bloat of systemd impedes troubleshooting, and its bad design relying on far too many moving parts and binary logging database not readable by common tools makes it a project perhaps suitable for non-tech user's desktop (not embedded, not server) only
A few kernel developers are quite vocal in their hatred for it, by the way. The young kids with no large server experience might like it for their laptop
On the server side when admining hundreds or thousands of machines, troubleshooting a bloated needlessly complex system wastes precious time. Serious admins I know don't like systemd for the server side.
On the other hand, might be appropriate for desktop
bullshit, object with insufficient orbital velocity will fall. For circular orbit that is 7.7 km/sec, about 17,200 MPH. Elliptical orbits can be more interesting, with closest approach of about 93 miles (unpowered, less than 80 miles possible with powered), but those go even faster at perigee
We haven't been discovering new particles for any significant length of time for you to make a statement about how long a practical application of a discovery takes. I could well say we only used four particles in applications for hundreds of thousands of years, and all of a sudden in a span of a decades are using many.
In 1950s anti-neutrinos discovered and now there are practical applications for it. Muons, positrons, anti-protons have practical applications. So in 60 years we went from only having application for proton, neutron, electron and photon to using four more particles. And if neutrino turns out to be a MF that would be huge.
This prediction was made on nonsensical assumptions and optimism, including doubling of efficiency on mass produced panels and absurd lowering of costs.
Wrong, I never post AC. You have no valid argument, nor point; and so now are reduced to mocking an AC who is not me. You are the one who is sad and pathetic, in addition to being ignorant of physics.
No, what matters more is discovering more fundamental particles of matter and energy. That will push civilization and technology further than any quasi-particle studied just because it *might* be useful for computation. Note no quantum computer using MF exists or likely will exist.
So what, quantum computers can built out of things that aren't Majorana particles too, and in fact all the existing ones aren't.
hole/electron semiconductors not even relevant, "hole" just a convenient model for electron that has some issues by the way, holes are NOT a quasi-particle as they have different properties than any particle. Holes in semiconductors don't behave as exact opposite of electron.
No, mod them down for talking out of their ass, understanding nothing. Quasi-particles are not fundamental particles that make up the universe. A fundamental majorana fermion would be newsworthy
Of course, quasi-particles are not elementary particles. They are not part of the Standard Model nor anything beyond it, they are not products of collisions in particle accelerators.
For the LCD themselves, look up the models used and their specs, they are so very ordinary and behind the curve in what they'll take as input, RGB and older composite video. There is nothing special about them.
Slashdot Mirror
I purposely buy motherboards with ps/2 port for my black 122 key model M. Hope that's still possible as next year my four year upgrade cycle (I buy a "barebones") comes around
My 122 key variant of the model M (has 24 function keys!) has heavy backplate and weighs six pounds!
SystemD fires off more processes, and moreover parallel starts services (which can be good thing, but that can be done with init style sytem too, long solved problem)
You talk out of your ass, admining init on those is solved problem. You are the one with no knowledge and no experience.
The bloat of systemd impedes troubleshooting, and its bad design relying on far too many moving parts and binary logging database not readable by common tools makes it a project perhaps suitable for non-tech user's desktop (not embedded, not server) only
A few kernel developers are quite vocal in their hatred for it, by the way. The young kids with no large server experience might like it for their laptop
On the server side when admining hundreds or thousands of machines, troubleshooting a bloated needlessly complex system wastes precious time. Serious admins I know don't like systemd for the server side.
On the other hand, might be appropriate for desktop
that sort of thing done in the age of swords, spears and bows
So you admit about half of particles have an application. dang, we're doing good in that regard.
There are NO commercial applications whatsoever of quasi-particle MF, your "whole category of things" has zero members. You lose.
wall of text is exactly what I want for most news
here's a picture of a Sharp dashboard concept
http://www.digitaltrends.com/h...
Alpha is still supported by HP, and OpenVMS on Alpha supported until 2018.
The emulation by Charon of Sparc is 32 bit, not the current 64 bit one. However, you can run 32 bit Sparc code on 64 bit sparc.
bullshit, object with insufficient orbital velocity will fall. For circular orbit that is 7.7 km/sec, about 17,200 MPH. Elliptical orbits can be more interesting, with closest approach of about 93 miles (unpowered, less than 80 miles possible with powered), but those go even faster at perigee
So avoiding a postdoc is very easy, don't be one. Get a job, the market and schools obviously don't want and don't value postdocs.
We haven't been discovering new particles for any significant length of time for you to make a statement about how long a practical application of a discovery takes. I could well say we only used four particles in applications for hundreds of thousands of years, and all of a sudden in a span of a decades are using many.
you're a vegan , no one cares what you think
yes absurd, industrial capacity won't keep doubling at that rate.
In 1950s anti-neutrinos discovered and now there are practical applications for it. Muons, positrons, anti-protons have practical applications. So in 60 years we went from only having application for proton, neutron, electron and photon to using four more particles. And if neutrino turns out to be a MF that would be huge.
for the same reason your local dollar store has crappy chinese tools for $1 each
This prediction was made on nonsensical assumptions and optimism, including doubling of efficiency on mass produced panels and absurd lowering of costs.
Wrong, I never post AC. You have no valid argument, nor point; and so now are reduced to mocking an AC who is not me. You are the one who is sad and pathetic, in addition to being ignorant of physics.
No, what matters more is discovering more fundamental particles of matter and energy. That will push civilization and technology further than any quasi-particle studied just because it *might* be useful for computation. Note no quantum computer using MF exists or likely will exist.
So what, quantum computers can built out of things that aren't Majorana particles too, and in fact all the existing ones aren't.
hole/electron semiconductors not even relevant, "hole" just a convenient model for electron that has some issues by the way, holes are NOT a quasi-particle as they have different properties than any particle. Holes in semiconductors don't behave as exact opposite of electron.
No, mod them down for talking out of their ass, understanding nothing. Quasi-particles are not fundamental particles that make up the universe. A fundamental majorana fermion would be newsworthy
Of course, quasi-particles are not elementary particles. They are not part of the Standard Model nor anything beyond it, they are not products of collisions in particle accelerators.
For the LCD themselves, look up the models used and their specs, they are so very ordinary and behind the curve in what they'll take as input, RGB and older composite video. There is nothing special about them.
not even interesting to me, not a particle but rather a region that has some properties like a particle, a "quasi-particle". *yawn*
sure, raise a race smokescreen when someone mentions subculture. You set off the bullshit detector.
Argue the contention instead.