yes, but you'd also get singularity according to General Relativity, it says event horizons must have singularities. Now, it may be that General Relativity isn't really true, that some quantum mechanical effect either prevents singularity, or (this article) that you can't have either one.
I've lived in places with the worst of both worlds, the city makes the contract with Waste Management Inc, and then turns around and has residents pay a tax part of which goes to that contractor and the rest to the city treasury
China has active nuclear technology development program, and roadmap. They even this year announced plan to join India in aggressively pursuing thorium reactors (millennia of energy supply) That's more than the USA has for true zero carbon emission alternative energy goals that can actually drive a civilization and progress forward. The energy-stupid USA should just shut up and get the hell out of the way of these smarter countries.
Rubbish, China actually has zero-emission energy programs and a plan, a roadmap for nuclear energy. That is more than the USA has. Leave China alone, they're already on a smarter path considering the long range view
You are very funny. If a machine is stalled in booting do you have tool available to read specialized binary file, versus those needed to list a text file? Gary Larson did a Far Side comic with a child trying to enter a "school for the gifted" by pushing on a door that had a handle and sign saying "pull". You were the model for that, weren't you?
That's nothing, my god makes me deploy software written by developers who prefer to write the code that will run on a Linux or Unix box, on their windows desktop. Their code will therefore do things like create a directory called "C:" and make a bunch of subdirectories under that, the deepest of which contains log files. So your god is vengeful, mine is a spiteful asshole.
not very fuel efficient or emissions conserving though for everyone to be driving to dump vs. diesel garbage truck. And there is the question of how much is your time worth, were you spending couple hours a week making trips?
why, c++ raises the probability of making bugs, spews compiler messages that are hard to read, and to add insult to injury will generate slower code. There is a reason the core libraries of the big math packages are still in Fortran. And after making statement like that someone will post link to some self-touting python / C project, failing to notice it uses huge mass of the same Fortran libraries everyone else uses.
An observer watching object in stronger gravitational field sees time move slower in/for the observed object. So if I observe you go close to the event horizon and then you come back out, your clock would show less time had elapsed than mine.
Worth noting that outside observer, assuming they could see the redshifted light of you, would see you slowing and dimming (observed time between each photon emission increases) as you approached event horizon, never to quite reach it. But there is a time of last photon to be emitted that can get out, so things dim and wink out before being seen to arrive at event horizon.
But if you fell into hole you'd experience no slowing down of your approach to either event horizon or singularity (assuming hole big enough tidal forces don't pull you apart). In fact the event horizon would approach faster and faster until it reached lightspeed as it "touched" you and went by.
Are you clear this theory says no event horizons and no singularities either? Only hawking radiation in area with strong enough gravity to lose gravitational energy by affecting spontaneous particle pair formation. Hawking radiation in case of black holes existing do not prevent singularity from forming as it only exists outside the event horizon. It does not provide a mechanism for changing space-time geodesic inside event horizon, which must end on singularity. If quantum mechanics does prevent singularity formation inside event horizon, it must do so by some other means, and no working theory exists that has normalizable fields
in classic GR nothing can intervene once the event horizon forms, all matter inside MUST wind up in singularity in finite time, and there is no infinite force that can keep that from happening.
Not according to General Relativity (without quantum mechanical consideration), a (gravitational) event horizon MUST have a singularity inside, proven by Hawkings and Penrose in the 1960s.
you are silly, testing tcp and udp services from scripts is the bread and butter of anyone who customizes the popular monitoring softwares (e.g. nagios, zabbix).
parallel starts from a script, seriously you don't know how to fork and detach, and then check status of process. trivial.
try it?, been doing things like that for 25+ years
all I really know is I have to carry an iphone every few weeks as part of NOC oncall rotation. It's a heavy brick compared to my nice slim android motorola Defy X-something. All the apps I need and use are free on Android. My employer also provides a nice quad core Macbook Pro, but I have no desire or reason to sync any information or otherwise integrate my phone with it
Slashdot Mirror
no, cowpie (ie meadow muffin, pasture patty)
does anyone even use that rubbish? Did they all of a sudden start listening to what users wanted and needed?
yes, but you'd also get singularity according to General Relativity, it says event horizons must have singularities. Now, it may be that General Relativity isn't really true, that some quantum mechanical effect either prevents singularity, or (this article) that you can't have either one.
I've lived in places with the worst of both worlds, the city makes the contract with Waste Management Inc, and then turns around and has residents pay a tax part of which goes to that contractor and the rest to the city treasury
China has active nuclear technology development program, and roadmap. They even this year announced plan to join India in aggressively pursuing thorium reactors (millennia of energy supply) That's more than the USA has for true zero carbon emission alternative energy goals that can actually drive a civilization and progress forward. The energy-stupid USA should just shut up and get the hell out of the way of these smarter countries.
Rubbish, China actually has zero-emission energy programs and a plan, a roadmap for nuclear energy. That is more than the USA has. Leave China alone, they're already on a smarter path considering the long range view
You are very funny. If a machine is stalled in booting do you have tool available to read specialized binary file, versus those needed to list a text file? Gary Larson did a Far Side comic with a child trying to enter a "school for the gifted" by pushing on a door that had a handle and sign saying "pull". You were the model for that, weren't you?
That's nothing, my god makes me deploy software written by developers who prefer to write the code that will run on a Linux or Unix box, on their windows desktop. Their code will therefore do things like create a directory called "C:" and make a bunch of subdirectories under that, the deepest of which contains log files. So your god is vengeful, mine is a spiteful asshole.
ah but in Texan micro is just two syllables "my-crow" while macro is three "my-yah-crow". Hope that helps.
ok I made that shit up
not very fuel efficient or emissions conserving though for everyone to be driving to dump vs. diesel garbage truck. And there is the question of how much is your time worth, were you spending couple hours a week making trips?
why, c++ raises the probability of making bugs, spews compiler messages that are hard to read, and to add insult to injury will generate slower code. There is a reason the core libraries of the big math packages are still in Fortran. And after making statement like that someone will post link to some self-touting python / C project, failing to notice it uses huge mass of the same Fortran libraries everyone else uses.
compiled COBOL and Forth also will beat the ass of C/C++
An observer watching object in stronger gravitational field sees time move slower in/for the observed object. So if I observe you go close to the event horizon and then you come back out, your clock would show less time had elapsed than mine.
Worth noting that outside observer, assuming they could see the redshifted light of you, would see you slowing and dimming (observed time between each photon emission increases) as you approached event horizon, never to quite reach it. But there is a time of last photon to be emitted that can get out, so things dim and wink out before being seen to arrive at event horizon.
But if you fell into hole you'd experience no slowing down of your approach to either event horizon or singularity (assuming hole big enough tidal forces don't pull you apart). In fact the event horizon would approach faster and faster until it reached lightspeed as it "touched" you and went by.
it affects other things than CGI, remote services that call bash for example: dhcp client being one listed in Redhat's CVE page
They pay them money to do that
Are you clear this theory says no event horizons and no singularities either? Only hawking radiation in area with strong enough gravity to lose gravitational energy by affecting spontaneous particle pair formation. Hawking radiation in case of black holes existing do not prevent singularity from forming as it only exists outside the event horizon. It does not provide a mechanism for changing space-time geodesic inside event horizon, which must end on singularity. If quantum mechanics does prevent singularity formation inside event horizon, it must do so by some other means, and no working theory exists that has normalizable fields
eh, don't understand your first phrase.
in classic GR nothing can intervene once the event horizon forms, all matter inside MUST wind up in singularity in finite time, and there is no infinite force that can keep that from happening.
Not according to General Relativity (without quantum mechanical consideration), a (gravitational) event horizon MUST have a singularity inside, proven by Hawkings and Penrose in the 1960s.
I have already justified and proven my argument, you are just left confused in the dust long after the parade went by.
Not obvious at all that C is hard to beat on raw speed on large inputs. Fortran and COBOL and Forth do that.
you are silly, testing tcp and udp services from scripts is the bread and butter of anyone who customizes the popular monitoring softwares (e.g. nagios, zabbix).
parallel starts from a script, seriously you don't know how to fork and detach, and then check status of process. trivial.
try it?, been doing things like that for 25+ years
indeed the big buzzwords now in industry a comsci PhD should consider are BIG DATA and DATA ANALYTICS
Remember Dr Seuss books? Science doesn't concern itself with moss-covered three handled family gradunzah's either. I don't have to define that either.
Those big bad boys usually don't fly between US cities though
all I really know is I have to carry an iphone every few weeks as part of NOC oncall rotation. It's a heavy brick compared to my nice slim android motorola Defy X-something. All the apps I need and use are free on Android. My employer also provides a nice quad core Macbook Pro, but I have no desire or reason to sync any information or otherwise integrate my phone with it