you are funny, AutoDesk has 85% market share, they are the de factor standard. The are certainty The Relevant ones. The cost of their software is nothing to the companies that use them to make millions to billions a year in profits.
The open source CAD alternatives are crap, sad to say. There is no credible threat to AutoDesk on the horizon for at least the next decade
the evidence for universes age is much stronger than for that than the assumptions about the existence of black holes, we only know there are massive objects, and quantum mechanics may not allow the formation of black holes
sure, but the UK first did cruder approximations, e.g. chasing after electrician on his commute to work, knocking him down, and shooting him in the head
well known to hams, and those who listen to shortwave, and those who try to listen to stations far away that normally can't be heard (used to be called DXers, maybe they still are) the ionospheres properties change by day and night, by seasons, by geomagnetic and solar activity.
HAARP explored those changes and propagation, and also changes by injecting RF into ionsphere (on a tiny, tiny scale compared to natural forces)
of course, we don't even know that black holes exist, quantum gravity might preclude it, or dense enough matter instead forms quark stars, q stars, preon star, etc. instead of black hole. Care should be taken to see if one of these alternatives to black holes can be detected by GRAVITY findings
we don't know wormholes exist, certain solutions to General Relativity have them but again we don't know if physically possible to form.
no, squatting and pinching off one plasmoid in the punch bowl pretty much means everyone forgets whatever good time they had at the party up to that point
You have not even answered the question with all your ranting and hot air. Again, what problem does an open source CPU format solve? I cannot think of a one, my open source software works fine on x86, sparc, MIPS, ARM7 (and anyone interested can get the specs for most of those architectures). I'll even make a claim that open specs are good enough for a CPU, irrelevant whether the particular mask patterns are known.
depends on the manufacturer, my USA made ones from 1980s are fine. some of my wife's asian made ones have died, but she's moved on to file based media anyway
about half the world's population has at least one mobile device. about half have zero mobile devices. Of course, you see shithead-targeting stats like "six billion people have access to a mobile device", which means exactly nothing.
you are wrong about the Java EE jobs for over $100K, we certainly have those where I work. Those are with 7+ years on the big EE platforms such as WebSphere or WebLogic on machines that handle money. Yes, the work is complex, tedious and boring as fuck.
you're confused, the materials we us don't exist in nature; they come first, and then much later the maths. bronze and steel made long before anyone did shear, moment, displacement calculations using them. buildings with wood and stone and mortar existed long before we did analysis of structures. with just math we'd have nothing.
some caveats, that only does i386 and amd64. the package manager in openbsd automatically updates packages anyway, as for the openbsd binaries despite what that mtier.org says it's very simple and fast to update, in less than four minutes I had applied all outstanding patches to a system I brought up today.
you know nothing of software development, and so spew ignorant tripe. Linus *invented* software to a specification (a pile of headers and expected behaviors). That is the hard part, any moron can read posix specs (doubtful you could even do that)
Slashdot Mirror
you are funny, AutoDesk has 85% market share, they are the de factor standard. The are certainty The Relevant ones. The cost of their software is nothing to the companies that use them to make millions to billions a year in profits.
The open source CAD alternatives are crap, sad to say. There is no credible threat to AutoDesk on the horizon for at least the next decade
yes, there is one more thing that needs to be said. here is a second bell curve, looks very much like your bell curve, but it isn't the same one.
the evidence for universes age is much stronger than for that than the assumptions about the existence of black holes, we only know there are massive objects, and quantum mechanics may not allow the formation of black holes
sure, but the UK first did cruder approximations, e.g. chasing after electrician on his commute to work, knocking him down, and shooting him in the head
well known to hams, and those who listen to shortwave, and those who try to listen to stations far away that normally can't be heard (used to be called DXers, maybe they still are) the ionospheres properties change by day and night, by seasons, by geomagnetic and solar activity.
HAARP explored those changes and propagation, and also changes by injecting RF into ionsphere (on a tiny, tiny scale compared to natural forces)
I think the UK tests oppressive tactics before being deployed in the USA, kind of like oppression beta version test site.
there are less deaths caused by digging other natural substances out of the ground?
Many here consider the UK an oppressive regime
of course, we don't even know that black holes exist, quantum gravity might preclude it, or dense enough matter instead forms quark stars, q stars, preon star, etc. instead of black hole. Care should be taken to see if one of these alternatives to black holes can be detected by GRAVITY findings
we don't know wormholes exist, certain solutions to General Relativity have them but again we don't know if physically possible to form.
more awesome at what, eye candy?
no, squatting and pinching off one plasmoid in the punch bowl pretty much means everyone forgets whatever good time they had at the party up to that point
You have not even answered the question with all your ranting and hot air. Again, what problem does an open source CPU format solve? I cannot think of a one, my open source software works fine on x86, sparc, MIPS, ARM7 (and anyone interested can get the specs for most of those architectures). I'll even make a claim that open specs are good enough for a CPU, irrelevant whether the particular mask patterns are known.
depends on the manufacturer, my USA made ones from 1980s are fine. some of my wife's asian made ones have died, but she's moved on to file based media anyway
but articles like this should mention the truth that half the people in this world do not have mobile devices at all
oh? what problem does it solve?
about half the world's population has at least one mobile device. about half have zero mobile devices. Of course, you see shithead-targeting stats like "six billion people have access to a mobile device", which means exactly nothing.
you are wrong about the Java EE jobs for over $100K, we certainly have those where I work. Those are with 7+ years on the big EE platforms such as WebSphere or WebLogic on machines that handle money. Yes, the work is complex, tedious and boring as fuck.
no it doesn't, just X
so far wayland has less features than X, but who knows about the future
more likely math was made to solve barter and wealth issues
don't worry, you can't. that's in the realm of Hollywood and TV bullshit, not reality.
you're confused, the materials we us don't exist in nature; they come first, and then much later the maths. bronze and steel made long before anyone did shear, moment, displacement calculations using them. buildings with wood and stone and mortar existed long before we did analysis of structures. with just math we'd have nothing.
they used to do that
by "automatic" I mean you type in pkg_add -u and it then updates all packages that have updates
some caveats, that only does i386 and amd64. the package manager in openbsd automatically updates packages anyway, as for the openbsd binaries despite what that mtier.org says it's very simple and fast to update, in less than four minutes I had applied all outstanding patches to a system I brought up today.
you know nothing of software development, and so spew ignorant tripe. Linus *invented* software to a specification (a pile of headers and expected behaviors). That is the hard part, any moron can read posix specs (doubtful you could even do that)
Unix had to work on pre-existing hardware too.