Slashdot Mirror


User: misterfusion

misterfusion's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
11
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 11

  1. Re:I want electricity! on Desktop Cold Fusion Reconsidered · · Score: 1

    You want electricity huh? Here you go. Read carefully: http://www.iscmns.org/iccf12/2005KrivitS-ICCF12-Pr esentation.pdf /JChan

  2. Re:Decaf? How about a Cold Fusion HOT cup of Tea? on We Pay Our Rent By Buying Coffee · · Score: 1

    OOps! forgot to post the link to the Italian paper... Click Here -JChan

  3. Re:Decaf? How about a Cold Fusion HOT cup of Tea? on We Pay Our Rent By Buying Coffee · · Score: 1

    Here's one for Mac afficianados and tea drinkers: The Japanese just released a paper via the Italian Journal IL Nuovo Saggiatore. Dr. Arata just received an Award from the Emperor of Japan(true). His second in 50 years of physics.
    This team claims a new form of "Solid deuterium", basically deuterium that adheres to Nano sized pieces of Palladium metal in larger amounts than possible in a solid chunk of Palladium.. Lots of heat + lots of Helium4 (clear unmistakable fusion signature in HUge amounts) released via an Ultrasound mechanism. Here's the actual claim this paper makes [www2.sif.it]:
    "as a consequence, in our experiments, for the first time in the world, we succeeded in producing intense nuclear fusion reactions inside metals, and generated a significantly large amount of He4 and thermal energy by using "solid deuterium" as a new fuel." ...it further states in the conclusions:
    In other words large amounts of pure deuterium gas (a) reacted to convert into He4, that is, the reactor tank converted the tank deuterium into He4. In addition, it is an ideal energy source in that no neutrons nor gamma rays were produced" Details are sketchy to protect patent claims I imagine after tracking this field for years.
    Mac users, figure out how to make power sources out of this ! -JChan

  4. Re:How much $$$? on Breakthrough Efficient, Paintable Solar Cells · · Score: 1

    I do believe its quite true. However the Japanese just released a paper via the Italian Journal IL Nuovo Saggiatore. Dr. Arata just received an Award from the Emperor of Japan(true). His second in 50 years of physics. Hold on to your solar hats if this claim proved true. This team claims a new form of "Solid Deuterium", basically deuterium that adheres to Nano sized pieces of Palladium metal. Lots of heat + lots of helium4 (fusion signature) released via an Ultrasound mechanism. Here's the actual claim this paper makes: "as a consequence, in our experiments, for the first time in the world, we succeeded in producing intense nuclear fusion reactions inside metals, and generated a significantly large amount of He4 and thermal energy by using "solid deuterium" as a new fuel."
    ...it further states in the conclusions:
    In other words large amounts of pure deuterium gas (a) reacted to convert into He4, that is, the reactor tank converted the tank deuterium into He4. In addition, it is an ideal energy source in that no neutrons nor gamma rays were produced" Details are skethy to protect patent claims. Compared to this amount of nuclear energy, solar technology may be plentifull and sustainable, but the "on demand heat sustaining capability" of clean fusion energy will make it pale in comparison I'm afraid. -JChan

  5. Re:Where are the neutrons? on DOE Report on Cold Fusion · · Score: 1

    Says who? God? Let me know the next time you eat lunch with him. Have you ever seen the inside of an atomic lattice within a metal? (hint: no one has - we only have indirect evidence)

    as R.P. Feynman used to counsel at Cal Tech about QED and QM:

    "What I am going to tell you about is what we teach our physics students in the third or fourth year of graduate school. It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. Nobody does".
    -Feynman, Richard P. Nobel Lecture, 1966

  6. X-prize Ideas Bust Beauracracy..Thanks Why on NASA Hoping To Create Super X-Prizes · · Score: 1

    Plain and simple. The status quo thinks it knows 'mo'. However, Burt Rutan like innovators are trully what is needed. Material Science education and re-training is the big key. It won't be a cake walk. However, the big squeeze often works in many agencies that don't change. They will. They will have to. -JChan http://www.atomicmotor.com (Nano blogger)

  7. Re:Where are the neutrons? on DOE Report on Cold Fusion · · Score: 1

    Yes..most physicists think of banging big and fast things together. The bigger the better was the old school way of doing things often times. However, Nature is often times prefers much smaller, more subtle methods in solid state physics regimes. We don't write the laws. God provides the clues. -JChan http://www.atomicmotor.com (blog site) its great to see all this talking!

  8. Re:I thought Cold Fusion was dead on DOE Report on Cold Fusion · · Score: 1

    I actually prefer PhP Nuke!, but the macromedia product is quite good. They co-opted the name for software, but the name is now part of the vernacular. Smart move macromedia. Looks like atomic sounding software is a trend. -JChan http://www.atomicmotor.com

  9. Re:Cold Fusion never happened, period. on DOE Report on Cold Fusion · · Score: 1

    Sir, you are sadly miss informed of the historical facts. There are many papers to read if you are interested that might help. A new dialog on this general cold fusion subject is good to see. -JChan http://www.atomicmotor.com There are more suprises to come yet, nature doesn't reveal secrets easily.

  10. Re:mad scientist on DOE Report on Cold Fusion · · Score: 1

    Mr. Hoffman: Good idea..we need smart folks thinking of alternatives. Ideas can come from anybody in this field. I've seen it happen myself. -JChan http://www.atomicmotor.com

  11. Re:This IS cold fusion on Journal of Applied Physics, NASA, and the Hydrino · · Score: 1

    Sorry Chemisor: Hydrino theory involves catalyst that "lowers the ground state of the electron below n=1, the first orbital. According to R. Mills' Theory (if its true) the extra energy released accounts for "anomalous amounts of heat" seen by some. However, I must caution, comparing this to Cold Fusion see: www.lenr-canr.org is not going to explain all the available data seen by many. What's interesting is the "convergence" of the nano and the nuclear going on (see : www.nucleosys.com ). Increasingly, the nano domain is approaching the domain that may explain some of what has been seen in Cold Fusion, where the laws of physics get weird and many new material processes may emerge that harness this weirdness.