I Googled that for you too.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Android+Optimus+V&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&lr=lang_en#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&lr=lang_en&safe=off&tbs=lr:lang_1en&source=hp&q=mac+Android+Optimus+V&pbx=1&oq=mac+Android+Optimus+V&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=3796l4458l0l4984l4l4l0l0l0l3l680l2010l3-1.1.2l4l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=16c1cac6da449bf6&biw=1910&bih=986
Good luck with any other new technology you're struggling with.
And I would be very interested to see Word Perfect 1.0 run on any modern hardware without some very very serious hack rages going on.
I don't think there WAS a 1.0 in WordPerfect's versioning. The initial release was on Data General minicomputers and had no version number, but would most likely still run comfortably on one of the SIMH multi-system emulators.
1. Extract "ov-root.zip" to a convenient location, you will use this later.
2. If your Optimus V isn't already connected to your PC with a USB cable, go ahead and do that.
3. Extract Super One Click and run "SuperOneClick.exe".
4. Select Shell Root.
If you need any more help, there's plenty of Android forums with tips for people who aren't good with technology. They're used to dealing with novices, and are likely to be patient with your questions.
They should have just hired an animator to draw th e inside of the reactor. It'd be a lot more informative, and given that the interim asessement of Tepco's response "reveals at times an almost cartoon-like level of incompetence.", woud be quite appropriate. http://www.economist.com/node/21542437
This wasn't really about a working radio system. It was about moving public money to private businesses.
Of course.
In fact it'd be much better for everybody, including emergency services, if everybody switched over to mesh communications (like the Serval project http://www.servalproject.org/about/how-it-works). It'll never happen though, because decentralised systems don't allow for ongoing billing.
I am not worried about the possibility of uniformed agents from Haliburton, Coca-Cola or Nestle seizing me up and sending me to some country to torture me?
Wait - you mean HBGary, whose clock was cleaned by Anonymous? Why would I ask them anything?
Doesn't anybody here know how to use a search engine?
More HBGary Federal Fallout: The Government Wants To Buy Software To Fake Online Grassroots Social Media Campaigns
The latest in the long line of revelations from the HBGary Federal email leak, is that HBGary Federal wanted to create software that could make it easy for staffers to create and maintain a massive number of fake online social network personas, allowing them to control virtual armies of totally fake people, whose only mission is to spy on others and spew paid-for propaganda.
Because people trying to market things to me is just the way capitalism works. The government spying on you and monitoring you
Your government has, and will continue to do many disgraceful things which invade your privacy and limit your freedoms, but In this instance, they're just monitoring public information. Your corporations are not only monitoring, they are actively influencing community discussions (using sockpuppet accounts) while pretending to be part of the community. That is decietful, and in many cases has effectively killed the community (ie, Digg).
The point I'm making is that it doesn't matter if your government monitors/interferes in social media, because all social media sites are already infested and untrustworthy.
All social media sites are now just playgrounds for marketing teams. There are multi billion dollar indusries built around promoting products/slandering competitors while pretending to be part of the onine community. Most of the big tech companies use sockpuppet accounts to "manage discussion" on Slashdot already.
Android phones originally looked like this [imgur.com].
Ah, it wouldn't be Slashdot without sly misdirection and deceptive practices.
There are TWO Android prototypes, one the image you've liked to, the other a (still ugly) candybar touchscreen device. Anyone who's used the emulator in the SDK will be familiar with the touchscreen version http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/android-emulator.jpg.
And since I've seen postings where this has been pointed out to you before, I can only conclude you're deliberately lying to mislead anyone who reads your posts. Most likely to persuade people to believe Google didn't plan on touchscreens from the start.
What's your motivation for this? Can you explain why it's so important for you to repeatedly lie in a public forum?
Emulating x86 on ARM seems to be the worst way to compansate for the lack of apps. And is it even possible? I mean, even discounting the usual losses due to emulation, x86 chips are usually much more powerful.
For the moment, true. However you don't need to do full x86 hardware emulation to get good results. Longsoon chips are MIPS based, but include hardware-assisted x86 emulation.
If someone like Qualcomm were to produce an advanced multi-core Snapdragon (a la Tegra) with a similar set of instructions, I have no doubt most productivity software would run well enough to be usable.
Hardware-assisted x86 emulation
Loongson 3 adds over 200 new instructions to speed up x86 instruction execution at a cost of 5% of the total die area. The new instructions help QEMU translate x86 instructions by lowering the overhead of executing x86/CISC-style instructions in the MIPS pipeline. With added improvements in QEMU from ICT, Loongson-3 achieves an average of 70% the performance of executing native binaries when running x86 binaries from nine benchmarks.
I have a feeling that "very responsive" in your mind is different than others.
No, most people who've used it have been impressed, even the iDevice users. In fact, a plenty of them ordered them on the strength of it.
They'll only get better too - I had a beta ROM of ICS running on it for a while, and that was very slick. I'm looking forward to using the official version when it arrives.
You can call me a fanboy, I guess. I have a one of the $100 Android tablets mentioned in TFA (actually, the $120 Novo 7 Advanced with Gingerbread), and it's an excellent little machine. I originally grabbed it as an Arduino platform, but it's very responsive, has 8Gb storage, capacitative multitouch and a good range of ports, including host mode USB and HDMI. I'm using it a lot more than I expected.
There's no way in hell Microsoft, Apple, RIM or any of the proprietary giants would have allowed a machine like that to be built if they could stop it - not enough margin for them. Look at how much effort MS put into killing Netbooks.
Still, if Apple wants to compete on price and quality with it, I say bring it on!
Seeing the big boys start competing in the sub-$100 tablet market would definitely be a win for us buying them
Andriod is gaining traction because it's given away free.
Not to Android users, it isn't.
Android users are buying Android phones because they're nice toys/tools. Easy to use, clever and fun. Pretty much exactly the same reasons they'd buy an iPhone.
There's plenty of reasons they'd choose one over the other, but given that some Android devices cost as much or more than iPhones, the price of the OS is unlikely to be a factor..
The point the pp was making is that " a mobile device which provides the user with the ability to schedule a meeting request from the mobile device itself." is about as ubiquitous and obvious as using touch screens on mobile devices.
The good news is that now that particular patent bullet has been fired, it won't be reusable for their standover team. One less round of ammunition for the rest of Microsoft's protection racket.
Slashdot Mirror
https://www.google.com/search?q=Android+Optimus+V&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&lr=lang_en#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&lr=lang_en&safe=off&tbs=lr:lang_1en&source=hp&q=mac+Android+Optimus+V&pbx=1&oq=mac+Android+Optimus+V&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=3796l4458l0l4984l4l4l0l0l0l3l680l2010l3-1.1.2l4l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=16c1cac6da449bf6&biw=1910&bih=986
Good luck with any other new technology you're struggling with.
And I would be very interested to see Word Perfect 1.0 run on any modern hardware without some very very serious hack rages going on.
I don't think there WAS a 1.0 in WordPerfect's versioning. The initial release was on Data General minicomputers and had no version number, but would most likely still run comfortably on one of the SIMH multi-system emulators.
So what you're saying is that Apple customers have not bought the operating systems for their devices, just the hardware?
Instructions
1. Extract "ov-root.zip" to a convenient location, you will use this later.
2. If your Optimus V isn't already connected to your PC with a USB cable, go ahead and do that.
3. Extract Super One Click and run "SuperOneClick.exe".
4. Select Shell Root.
http://www.prepaidandroid.org/index.php?title=How_to_root_your_Optimus_V
If you need any more help, there's plenty of Android forums with tips for people who aren't good with technology. They're used to dealing with novices, and are likely to be patient with your questions.
Every posting from them is slanted as an attack on Android, Google or Linux.
They should have just hired an animator to draw th e inside of the reactor. It'd be a lot more informative, and given that the interim asessement of Tepco's response "reveals at times an almost cartoon-like level of incompetence.", woud be quite appropriate.
http://www.economist.com/node/21542437
Your worried? I misread it as R&B dominance.
I misread it as B&D dominance and was about to embark on a rant about subbies who should be spanked for their rampant RAS syndrome...
This wasn't really about a working radio system. It was about moving public money to private businesses.
Of course.
In fact it'd be much better for everybody, including emergency services, if everybody switched over to mesh communications (like the Serval project http://www.servalproject.org/about/how-it-works). It'll never happen though, because decentralised systems don't allow for ongoing billing.
For now, they are.
You asked where you could buy a Windows 8 ARM license, such a thing does not exist
Where can I buy XBox/360 licenses to build consoles with my own hardware?
Nope, dipods. Budget cuts.
iPods then.
They are evil, I've seen their little white tentacles creeping into people's brains and making them act like twitchy zombies.
I am not worried about the possibility of uniformed agents from Haliburton, Coca-Cola or Nestle seizing me up and sending me to some country to torture me?
You might be thinking of Blackwater, They provided a lot of the security, seizure and torture for the USA in Iraq (Haliburton mostly did infrastructure). You can download the The 2004 CIA Inspector General Report on Torture here: http://washingtonindependent.com/56175/the-2004-cia-inspector-generals-report-on-torture
Wait - you mean HBGary, whose clock was cleaned by Anonymous? Why would I ask them anything?
Doesn't anybody here know how to use a search engine?
More HBGary Federal Fallout: The Government Wants To Buy Software To Fake Online Grassroots Social Media Campaigns
The latest in the long line of revelations from the HBGary Federal email leak, is that HBGary Federal wanted to create software that could make it easy for staffers to create and maintain a massive number of fake online social network personas, allowing them to control virtual armies of totally fake people, whose only mission is to spy on others and spew paid-for propaganda.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110218/02143213163/more-hbgary-federal-fallout-government-wants-to-buy-software-to-fake-online-grassroots-social-media-campaigns.shtml
Does that give you some hint as to why Ethanol-fueled's posting might be relevant?
Because people trying to market things to me is just the way capitalism works. The government spying on you and monitoring you
Your government has, and will continue to do many disgraceful things which invade your privacy and limit your freedoms, but In this instance, they're just monitoring public information. Your corporations are not only monitoring, they are actively influencing community discussions (using sockpuppet accounts) while pretending to be part of the community. That is decietful, and in many cases has effectively killed the community (ie, Digg).
The point I'm making is that it doesn't matter if your government monitors/interferes in social media, because all social media sites are already infested and untrustworthy.
http://www.google.com/search?q=social+media+marketing&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&lr=lang_en
All social media sites are now just playgrounds for marketing teams. There are multi billion dollar indusries built around promoting products/slandering competitors while pretending to be part of the onine community. Most of the big tech companies use sockpuppet accounts to "manage discussion" on Slashdot already.
Why would you care if the government joins them?
Android phones originally looked like this [imgur.com].
Ah, it wouldn't be Slashdot without sly misdirection and deceptive practices.
There are TWO Android prototypes, one the image you've liked to, the other a (still ugly) candybar touchscreen device. Anyone who's used the emulator in the SDK will be familiar with the touchscreen version http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/android-emulator.jpg.
And since I've seen postings where this has been pointed out to you before, I can only conclude you're deliberately lying to mislead anyone who reads your posts. Most likely to persuade people to believe Google didn't plan on touchscreens from the start.
What's your motivation for this? Can you explain why it's so important for you to repeatedly lie in a public forum?
Emulating x86 on ARM seems to be the worst way to compansate for the lack of apps. And is it even possible? I mean, even discounting the usual losses due to emulation, x86 chips are usually much more powerful.
For the moment, true. However you don't need to do full x86 hardware emulation to get good results. Longsoon chips are MIPS based, but include hardware-assisted x86 emulation.
If someone like Qualcomm were to produce an advanced multi-core Snapdragon (a la Tegra) with a similar set of instructions, I have no doubt most productivity software would run well enough to be usable.
Hardware-assisted x86 emulation
Loongson 3 adds over 200 new instructions to speed up x86 instruction execution at a cost of 5% of the total die area. The new instructions help QEMU translate x86 instructions by lowering the overhead of executing x86/CISC-style instructions in the MIPS pipeline. With added improvements in QEMU from ICT, Loongson-3 achieves an average of 70% the performance of executing native binaries when running x86 binaries from nine benchmarks.
Still an OS from Samsung? Seems everybody wants an OS nowadays ;)
http://www.bada.com/
They're counting all the people who bought a Kin as well...
I have a feeling that "very responsive" in your mind is different than others.
No, most people who've used it have been impressed, even the iDevice users. In fact, a plenty of them ordered them on the strength of it.
They'll only get better too - I had a beta ROM of ICS running on it for a while, and that was very slick. I'm looking forward to using the official version when it arrives.
There's no way in hell Microsoft, Apple, RIM or any of the proprietary giants would have allowed a machine like that to be built if they could stop it - not enough margin for them. Look at how much effort MS put into killing Netbooks.
Still, if Apple wants to compete on price and quality with it, I say bring it on!
Seeing the big boys start competing in the sub-$100 tablet market would definitely be a win for us buying them
Andriod is gaining traction because it's given away free.
Not to Android users, it isn't.
Android users are buying Android phones because they're nice toys/tools. Easy to use, clever and fun. Pretty much exactly the same reasons they'd buy an iPhone.
There's plenty of reasons they'd choose one over the other, but given that some Android devices cost as much or more than iPhones, the price of the OS is unlikely to be a factor..
Did MSFT get rid of WinPhone 7
Not many of them, no.
The good news is that now that particular patent bullet has been fired, it won't be reusable for their standover team. One less round of ammunition for the rest of Microsoft's protection racket.