most AV products can handle.zip files, as well as.gz.rar.cab.jar, so do TrendMicro, as a previous comments pointed out, it's a matter of update the signature/pattern/definition files.
he is asking if we should be blocking ZIP files?
not "how can we block ZIP files?"
What kind of "freedom" does a citizen have in a communist country?
although that is an irony, although this is an Offtopic...
1. we do have free speech, as long as you are talking to your friends, not in public, nor publish.
2. we do have the rights to vote, but there's always only one candidate, and you have no idea where is the guy come from, in most case.
3. we do have the right to move to anyplace inside the country, just a few cities will ask you to _buy_ a certificate to identify yourself, while you already have a nationwide ID cards, and if you can not show the cert to policeman on the street who is interested in you, well, there's a nice place they call "labor camp"...
4....
well, I don't have the time and mood to continue the list, dear moderators, if you'd like to mod this up, mod it as informative, not funny, if you'd like to mod this down, mod it as redundant, not troll, please.
It is their country. They can do what they want really. If they want to disallow the usage of google even, that IS their right.
what's your "they" refer to? the gov or the people? are you saying that gov has the right to disallow the usage of google? well, you'll be a happy man if you are a Chinese and live in China, while I'm not happy about that.
SITAR employs fault-tolerance principles such as providing redundancy in key functions and diversity in configuration. For example,... two different programs running on two different computers with two different operating systems.
so you are going to help customers porting their key application, and buy the computer/OS, and call this "fault-tolerance "?
SITAR's first line of defense consists of "proxy servers," computers that stand as intermediaries between the protected system and the outside world. The proxy servers screen incoming requests for service and decide whether to pass a request on to internal servers that do the real work.
CheckPoint doesn't have a product with this feature?
Quake3/RTCW will load PB to connect a PB-enabled server, and if the version of the PB client on your PC is out-of-date, it will be updated automatically.
the new version may contains more pattenrs for "cheater program", just like virus patterns, or only come with a new package format.
foundationally, everything can be cracked. but you have to catch up with the newest PB release, every time, otherwise, chances are good that you will be detected as "cheater". and you know it's not a good thing when you are doing serious "real-money" business, not just play for fun.
they update the PB very frequently. and there's a lot effort to sniff the PB packages.
I never did anything of this, and I don't know whether they're using any encryption, like RSA.
Google is not BLOCKING you from visiting this site. Google only reports what it has in its index relevant to what you asked for in the context of where you are.
reminds me about/.: Nothing is deleted: if you want to read the raw, uncut Slashdot, simply set your threshold to -1 and go crazy!
that is! return the BAD links as result[10389], return random GOOD links as result[0-10388] and result[10390-23787]: Nothing is filtered: if you want to read the raw, uncut Internet, simply dedicate your life to The Era of Information and go crazy!
but unfortunatley too much u.s. citizen and papers seem not wanting to make use of it in these days.
They don't need to, that's not unfortunate, that's why the amendment of free speech can be done.
Liberty or free speech never exist in those society whose citizens have a lot of things to oppose/resist/fight for, it's sad but true, just look at the history or today's China/NorthKorean.
No, I believe they did this for "remind", not "duplicate", otherwise, how could this kind of thing happen so frequently? even a 6 years old child can learn the lesson from past.
And how is locking someone in a cage for the rest of their life not revenge?
It is, if you insist. and it's definitely not justice. it's more like some sort of moderation, to prevent potential damage to the others: a little bit more innocent people.
what he lost if lock him in a cage, is the freedom (physically speaking, not mentally), not his life. that's the difference. and that's the achievement of humanity evolution: nobody, even God if you believe, has the right to terminate another human being's life: the most precious matter (mentally speaking, not physically) in this universe.
and, in practice, a human player can make a move (actually, that's not move, but put the Stone) with the consideration of 50, or even 100-150 puts later, no, i'm not saying the player knows the whole forthcoming process, the player just have the feeling, or more precise: the experience.
well, other chess programs also have the problem, what do they do? the patterns. the experience of a human player can be represented as patterns. but when it comes to Go, the scale makes it a serious problem: as everybody can see, the chess board of Go is a whole lot bigger than other chess boards, the complexity of patterns (or any other thing in chess AI) just grows like exponential increase.
and one more factor. the creativity. this may not be so important if the possibilities of a single move (put) is not so excessive.
i don't know, but if someone really want to read a book/article about How to be a Programmer?. i always recommend this book: The Practice of Programming, by Brian W. Kernighan and Rob Pike.
you know what's wrong with your article? you just list a few books, and say: "go learn programming there", then you start talking about debugging, in section Beginner! what a misleading...yes, i know bug happens, we can never finish a project without debugging, but, you should not emphasize this and forgot the more important thing: Write Simplicity/Clarity/Generality code, eliminate bugs (not all, of course) at the first place.
i'm working for an international software vendor at China, and i do lots of cooperative works with US/DE/JP programmers. as far as i know, their tech skill is no better than me (of course, there must be sth they know but i don't, and i know sth they don't. i'm talking about the design/analyse/debug...you know, general skills), but geeks in US got $60000/year, how much did i get? $12000/year.
we're still cheaper than you. i'm not happy about this, and i guess you too.
......and Microsoft Visual Studio compiler on Windows XP. Not
They changed the name from ".Net" to ".Not"? surprisingly (for me at least),
Re:It's nice
on
Immortal Code
·
· Score: 2, Informative
id like for someone to tell me what is just so great about cout (and its similar classes)
by using cout, you can write the operator<<() for you own class, so the code looks a little bit more elegant than use printf():
cout << instance;
printf ("%s", instance.toString());
and cout can prevent novice programmer to write printf (str); which may leads to unpredictable result.
further more, cout is a instance of ostream, which means you can take the advantage of so called "polymorphism":
ClassName::dumpTo (ostream &os);
you can pass the cout as the parameter, you can use a ofstream too. well, i know you can use fprintf to do the job in C-style. but by write your own class which inherited from ostream, you can dumpTo socket/database/screen...you got the point.
"Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice" By Foley, van Dam, Feiner and Hughes is *the* classic reference
agree, that's *the* classic reference for people who interested to write a replacement of opengl, or a software render engine. not for a game programming novice.
i've been talking about TCPA to my manager for several times during lunch, told him what the TCPA is, and how evil it is. and just right now, i saw the name of the company which i'm currently working for on that list, and i'm not surprised. Damn! i should know this...
Since the vast majority Linux development tools are Free and installed by default by many distributions, there's less justification for someone to hack out a craptapular trivial app, closed source, and charge money for it.
unless the license of the free tool say so (no commercial use, etc), otherwise, just because he used some free tool, doesn't mean he is not justified to sell his achievement, which he spent all the time on it, and want make a living on it. it's not unjustified, it's not even unethical: he doesn't stole anything, he doesn't violate anyone. he is just a programmer who sell his work. and it's not his fault that gcc is free.
BTW: if the app is really craptapular and trivial, nobody will pay for it. so don't bother, it's his business.
how about this:
you rent an apartment, you made a deal with the landlady, say, $300/M, and sometimes, your girl friend may live with you in this apartment for a couple days, that's OK, the landlady understand. contract done: $300/M for up to 2 person live in this apartment. then, some of your slastdot buddies (to apply the word "slashdotted") have no place to live, you invite them to live with you. and the landlady find out the overuse, charge you for extra $300. how do you think? does this make sense?
what's my point? well, don't be a sensitive clod. you pay for what you use. you use more, you pay more. maybe the stuff can not be materialized, that doesn't mean you are maltreated. this is what so called "service".
they can never prevent this happen
on
When Sysadmins Go Bad
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
SysAdmin, as the word says, it's the Administrator of the System.
there's no technical way to restrict their actions, or we should restrict the computer's capacity.
people do bad things for money, that's all, how could we prevent this happen? how could we prevent crime? how could we prevent people shoot each other? these are analog.
this does make sense, i always wonder why slashdot itself never been slashdotted...but, wait, if i'm one of the two, why should i wonder this?....(&$*(#^$
Slashdot Mirror
most AV products can handle .zip files, as well as .gz .rar .cab .jar, so do TrendMicro, as a previous comments pointed out, it's a matter of update the signature/pattern/definition files.
he is asking if we should be blocking ZIP files?
not "how can we block ZIP files?"
What kind of "freedom" does a citizen have in a communist country?
although that is an irony, although this is an Offtopic...
1. we do have free speech, as long as you are talking to your friends, not in public, nor publish.
2. we do have the rights to vote, but there's always only one candidate, and you have no idea where is the guy come from, in most case.
3. we do have the right to move to anyplace inside the country, just a few cities will ask you to _buy_ a certificate to identify yourself, while you already have a nationwide ID cards, and if you can not show the cert to policeman on the street who is interested in you, well, there's a nice place they call "labor camp"...
4.
well, I don't have the time and mood to continue the list, dear moderators, if you'd like to mod this up, mod it as informative, not funny, if you'd like to mod this down, mod it as redundant, not troll, please.
It is their country. They can do what they want really. If they want to disallow the usage of google even, that IS their right.
what's your "they" refer to? the gov or the people? are you saying that gov has the right to disallow the usage of google? well, you'll be a happy man if you are a Chinese and live in China, while I'm not happy about that.
No, I'll never trust Slashdot on anything today.
I mean, NEVER
here is one more essay about "flow", which is i've read a few years ago, and which is more interesting than the original story link (IMHO).
SITAR employs fault-tolerance principles such as providing redundancy in key functions and diversity in configuration. For example, ... two different programs running on two different computers with two different operating systems.
so you are going to help customers porting their key application, and buy the computer/OS, and call this "fault-tolerance "?
SITAR's first line of defense consists of "proxy servers," computers that stand as intermediaries between the protected system and the outside world. The proxy servers screen incoming requests for service and decide whether to pass a request on to internal servers that do the real work.
CheckPoint doesn't have a product with this feature?
OK, stop, I have other things todo...
Quake3/RTCW will load PB to connect a PB-enabled server, and if the version of the PB client on your PC is out-of-date, it will be updated automatically.
the new version may contains more pattenrs for "cheater program", just like virus patterns, or only come with a new package format.
foundationally, everything can be cracked. but you have to catch up with the newest PB release, every time, otherwise, chances are good that you will be detected as "cheater". and you know it's not a good thing when you are doing serious "real-money" business, not just play for fun.
they update the PB very frequently. and there's a lot effort to sniff the PB packages.
I never did anything of this, and I don't know whether they're using any encryption, like RSA.
Google is not BLOCKING you from visiting this site. Google only reports what it has in its index relevant to what you asked for in the context of where you are.
/.: Nothing is deleted: if you want to read the raw, uncut Slashdot, simply set your threshold to -1 and go crazy!
reminds me about
that is! return the BAD links as result[10389], return random GOOD links as result[0-10388] and result[10390-23787]: Nothing is filtered: if you want to read the raw, uncut Internet, simply dedicate your life to The Era of Information and go crazy!
Censorship NT
but unfortunatley too much u.s. citizen and papers seem not wanting to make use of it in these days.
They don't need to, that's not unfortunate, that's why the amendment of free speech can be done.
Liberty or free speech never exist in those society whose citizens have a lot of things to oppose/resist/fight for, it's sad but true, just look at the history or today's China/NorthKorean.
No, I believe they did this for "remind", not "duplicate", otherwise, how could this kind of thing happen so frequently? even a 6 years old child can learn the lesson from past.
And how is locking someone in a cage for the rest of their life not revenge?
It is, if you insist. and it's definitely not justice. it's more like some sort of moderation, to prevent potential damage to the others: a little bit more innocent people.
what he lost if lock him in a cage, is the freedom (physically speaking, not mentally), not his life. that's the difference. and that's the achievement of humanity evolution: nobody, even God if you believe, has the right to terminate another human being's life: the most precious matter (mentally speaking, not physically) in this universe.
This retard has no right to live.
Every human being has the right to live. and every human being made mistakes.
To kill a person just because he killed someone, or destroied someone's life, is revenge, not justice.
As you may already know, Japanese had done lots actual stuff to truly simulate the anime p0rn, and that's the origin idea of "cosplay".
and, in practice, a human player can make a move (actually, that's not move, but put the Stone) with the consideration of 50, or even 100-150 puts later, no, i'm not saying the player knows the whole forthcoming process, the player just have the feeling, or more precise: the experience.
well, other chess programs also have the problem, what do they do? the patterns. the experience of a human player can be represented as patterns. but when it comes to Go, the scale makes it a serious problem: as everybody can see, the chess board of Go is a whole lot bigger than other chess boards, the complexity of patterns (or any other thing in chess AI) just grows like exponential increase.
and one more factor. the creativity. this may not be so important if the possibilities of a single move (put) is not so excessive.
just waiting for the next computing revolution...
i don't know, but if someone really want to read a book/article about How to be a Programmer?. i always recommend this book: The Practice of Programming, by Brian W. Kernighan and Rob Pike.
you know what's wrong with your article? you just list a few books, and say: "go learn programming there", then you start talking about debugging, in section Beginner! what a misleading...yes, i know bug happens, we can never finish a project without debugging, but, you should not emphasize this and forgot the more important thing: Write Simplicity/Clarity/Generality code, eliminate bugs (not all, of course) at the first place.
i'm working for an international software vendor at China, and i do lots of cooperative works with US/DE/JP programmers. as far as i know, their tech skill is no better than me (of course, there must be sth they know but i don't, and i know sth they don't. i'm talking about the design/analyse/debug...you know, general skills), but geeks in US got $60000/year, how much did i get? $12000/year.
we're still cheaper than you. i'm not happy about this, and i guess you too.
......and Microsoft Visual Studio compiler on Windows XP. Not
They changed the name from ".Net" to ".Not"? surprisingly (for me at least),
id like for someone to tell me what is just so great about cout (and its similar classes)
by using cout, you can write the operator<<() for you own class, so the code looks a little bit more elegant than use printf():
cout << instance;
printf ("%s", instance.toString());
and cout can prevent novice programmer to write printf (str); which may leads to unpredictable result.
further more, cout is a instance of ostream, which means you can take the advantage of so called "polymorphism":
ClassName::dumpTo (ostream &os);
you can pass the cout as the parameter, you can use a ofstream too. well, i know you can use fprintf to do the job in C-style. but by write your own class which inherited from ostream, you can dumpTo socket/database/screen...you got the point.
"Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice" By Foley, van Dam, Feiner and Hughes is *the* classic reference
agree, that's *the* classic reference for people who interested to write a replacement of opengl, or a software render engine. not for a game programming novice.
I'm curious how it works in other countries
in our red china, they lift your hands, and say: "Hey, this guy vote yes!"
i've been talking about TCPA to my manager for several times during lunch, told him what the TCPA is, and how evil it is. and just right now, i saw the name of the company which i'm currently working for on that list, and i'm not surprised. Damn! i should know this...
Since the vast majority Linux development tools are Free and installed by default by many distributions, there's less justification for someone to hack out a craptapular trivial app, closed source, and charge money for it.
unless the license of the free tool say so (no commercial use, etc), otherwise, just because he used some free tool, doesn't mean he is not justified to sell his achievement, which he spent all the time on it, and want make a living on it. it's not unjustified, it's not even unethical: he doesn't stole anything, he doesn't violate anyone. he is just a programmer who sell his work. and it's not his fault that gcc is free.
BTW: if the app is really craptapular and trivial, nobody will pay for it. so don't bother, it's his business.
how about this:
you rent an apartment, you made a deal with the landlady, say, $300/M, and sometimes, your girl friend may live with you in this apartment for a couple days, that's OK, the landlady understand. contract done: $300/M for up to 2 person live in this apartment. then, some of your slastdot buddies (to apply the word "slashdotted") have no place to live, you invite them to live with you. and the landlady find out the overuse, charge you for extra $300. how do you think? does this make sense?
what's my point? well, don't be a sensitive clod. you pay for what you use. you use more, you pay more. maybe the stuff can not be materialized, that doesn't mean you are maltreated. this is what so called "service".
SysAdmin, as the word says, it's the Administrator of the System.
there's no technical way to restrict their actions, or we should restrict the computer's capacity.
people do bad things for money, that's all, how could we prevent this happen? how could we prevent crime? how could we prevent people shoot each other? these are analog.
it's political or human issue. not technical.
this does make sense, i always wonder why slashdot itself never been slashdotted...but, wait, if i'm one of the two, why should i wonder this?....(&$*(#^$