http://thomas.loc.gov/ Read anything you want. You don't need the president's permission to read bills before they become law. Though, unlike your representatives, you're not bound by due diligence to do so.
We're having some trouble hearing you guys down here. Can you descend to our level temporarily so we can receive the wisdom we so desperately need? It's probably our fault we can't hear. God, we're pathetic.
Right, except if it costs me $10,000 to have the baby, I'm sure as hell not going to spend $30,000 on announcements and newspaper ads telling everyone about it.
Your DOS C++ runtime would need to support threads. I imagine you'd have to write a scheduler that ran them sequentially rather than concurrently. Your performance wouldn't be as good as it would be on a multitasking OS, but that's sort of the point.
At any rate, it doesn't mean that you can't implement the language, it just means that the language can't teach your OS new tricks.
I had a similar notion when concerns were circling about bills being too long to feasibly read before a representative voted on it, but it was for bills in general, not just earmarks.
So was the discoverer forced to live the life of one of the villagers in a simulation, learning the way of their culture and becoming richer for the experience?
You lack of logic is infuriating. If a lawyer does his job correctly then they simply use the legal system to achieve the goals of their client. If the RIAA did some bad shit with lawyers, that doesn't mean the lawyer is bad. In fact, if a lawyer is willing to swim against the current of public opinion, that makes them an excellent lawyer. It shows that they only care about one thing; the best interests of their client.
Lawyers do not make policy. They exercise the legal system to best serve their clients. The heads you're looking to make roll are the lawyer's former employers.
Slashdot Mirror
http://thomas.loc.gov/ Read anything you want. You don't need the president's permission to read bills before they become law. Though, unlike your representatives, you're not bound by due diligence to do so.
We're having some trouble hearing you guys down here. Can you descend to our level temporarily so we can receive the wisdom we so desperately need? It's probably our fault we can't hear. God, we're pathetic.
Lived in Houston all my life, and ya'll is definitely not the spelling. Y'all is the correct contraction of "you" and "all."
Right, except if it costs me $10,000 to have the baby, I'm sure as hell not going to spend $30,000 on announcements and newspaper ads telling everyone about it.
This guy...his shop isn't on Fleet Street, is it?
Our scrums take less time than it took to read this article. Chances are you're doing it wrong.
All kidding aside, Debian stable uses 2.6 kernels. If you're running lenny, make sure you're safe.
Your DOS C++ runtime would need to support threads. I imagine you'd have to write a scheduler that ran them sequentially rather than concurrently. Your performance wouldn't be as good as it would be on a multitasking OS, but that's sort of the point.
At any rate, it doesn't mean that you can't implement the language, it just means that the language can't teach your OS new tricks.
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/07/09/1811249
I had a similar notion when concerns were circling about bills being too long to feasibly read before a representative voted on it, but it was for bills in general, not just earmarks.
http://palshife.net/2009/02/27/government-in-the-eyes-of-a-technologist
Personally, I like the idea of doing earmarks specifically since it would go a long way toward showing just where the federal government's money goes.
Is it because gay people would be able to have children that share the dna from 2 same-sex parents?
This is obviously what I meant.
Right, but to answer the question, we still need to know your weight!
Besides the obvious? Homosexual couples can't currently conceive children. This could grant that ability. That's pretty huge.
So was the discoverer forced to live the life of one of the villagers in a simulation, learning the way of their culture and becoming richer for the experience?
http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/unisex/generic/5d6a/
Worn by millions. Get one before they're obsolete :)
You. Turn in your geek card. Now.
3. 3. HTML ordered lists already number themselves.
An iPhone is a poor investment. Here's a tip; they'll release a better phone next year, and the 3GS will be worth less.
Fail. RTF question.
You misspelled anything but Farscape.
Yep. The trains will be built by elves which are not part of the economy. What we need are more shitty cars from companies ruled by unions.
Sanjay Gupta was never nominated for anything.
You lack of logic is infuriating. If a lawyer does his job correctly then they simply use the legal system to achieve the goals of their client. If the RIAA did some bad shit with lawyers, that doesn't mean the lawyer is bad. In fact, if a lawyer is willing to swim against the current of public opinion, that makes them an excellent lawyer. It shows that they only care about one thing; the best interests of their client.
Lawyers do not make policy. They exercise the legal system to best serve their clients. The heads you're looking to make roll are the lawyer's former employers.
Point, Obama.
From TFA, North Korea's neighbours suspect the launch was a cover for a long-range missile test.
Will it blend?