Wrong. In fact, UK submarines can launch unilaterally; they don't even need authorisation from London, although the system cannot be armed and activated by one person. US missiles are PAL-locked; the UK chose not to install the option when it was made available.
On currency, there's a lot of pre-vote posturing. The most likely scenario is that we keep the pound and major financial institutions continue to be regulated by the Bank of England. No-one is in the slightest bit keen on the groat or the mark.
The point of nukes is to have them at sea. Multiplying depots doesn;t really add any military advantage but multiplies costs and attendant risks (and Faslane is reasonably well protected naturally).
Tolerance. If you are within that zone then more often than not you can get off by challenging the equipment used. Bumping the limits wouldn't change that.
Well, it depends on the jurisdiction. In the UK, the Queen presses charges, via the Crown Prosecution Service. In other places, the individual raises the initial charge, which is then prosecuted by the state.
I know he is wanted on a rape charge and has decided the appropriate response is to hide. There is no valid explanation. If you really think you are so important the US government wants to off you, in whatever sense, then stand up like a man and take it.
They are not much higher, they are on the order of 10-20% higher. And this should not make any difference in countries with a sane medical system, such as the UK - yet it persists.
Umm, the point of the GPL is not altruism. It is to create software that the end user has the right to inspect and modify. So yes, if altruism is your goal, public domain your code and be done with it (this works perfectly well for, say, SQLite).
Speaking as a Londoner, I can live without a detailed knowledge of what's running in the West End and just make do with being taken to my destination for half the cost.
Except that none of the foregoing is true; it is merely the fantasies of those who wish to claim themselves as the Master Race. From Wikipedia: "It is still not resolved what relation, if any, there is between group differences in IQ and race."
Yes, but it is an open question as to whether it was regulation or the rise of the concept of the trusted brand (as well as the development of tort law; issues like Donoghue v Stevenson were not settled until the early 20th century) that was responsible for driving improvements.
Slashdot Mirror
Wrong. In fact, UK submarines can launch unilaterally; they don't even need authorisation from London, although the system cannot be armed and activated by one person. US missiles are PAL-locked; the UK chose not to install the option when it was made available.
>> were deemed "too close to population centres" [citation needed]
On currency, there's a lot of pre-vote posturing. The most likely scenario is that we keep the pound and major financial institutions continue to be regulated by the Bank of England. No-one is in the slightest bit keen on the groat or the mark.
The point of nukes is to have them at sea. Multiplying depots doesn;t really add any military advantage but multiplies costs and attendant risks (and Faslane is reasonably well protected naturally).
Tolerance. If you are within that zone then more often than not you can get off by challenging the equipment used. Bumping the limits wouldn't change that.
Well, when you hit a wall at several hundred miles an hour the damage is mechanical. At plankton scale it's effectively just chemistry.
Well, it depends on the jurisdiction. In the UK, the Queen presses charges, via the Crown Prosecution Service. In other places, the individual raises the initial charge, which is then prosecuted by the state.
Do show me where it was that women as a class asked for those things.
A starting point might be thousands of years of repression, yah.
Is that First Amendment enough for you? Also, regular, my ass. Fuck off with your seven digit UID.
I know he is wanted on a rape charge and has decided the appropriate response is to hide. There is no valid explanation. If you really think you are so important the US government wants to off you, in whatever sense, then stand up like a man and take it.
His character has nothing to do with it. It's his actions he is being judged for.
>> natural differences exist [citation needed]
It would certainly make the Bank of England's regulation more effective if it became known they had a death ray and were willing to use it.
Sort of. He did agree to their removal, though.
Sure, I'll do your googling for you. Starter for ten.
They are not much higher, they are on the order of 10-20% higher. And this should not make any difference in countries with a sane medical system, such as the UK - yet it persists.
Umm, the point of the GPL is not altruism. It is to create software that the end user has the right to inspect and modify. So yes, if altruism is your goal, public domain your code and be done with it (this works perfectly well for, say, SQLite).
Balancing the evil is the fact that women tend to take time off to do irritating things like have babies.
Well, there is good evidence that blindly hiring to a quota raises productivity more than blindly selecting the "best" applicants, for a start.
Where is your evidence that either of those things are the case?
Speaking as a Londoner, I can live without a detailed knowledge of what's running in the West End and just make do with being taken to my destination for half the cost.
So please, take your racist bullshit elsewhere.
And how much reading aloud do you do with him/her?
Yes, but it is an open question as to whether it was regulation or the rise of the concept of the trusted brand (as well as the development of tort law; issues like Donoghue v Stevenson were not settled until the early 20th century) that was responsible for driving improvements.