Apparently the manufacturers of ecig supplies are making very poor quality products. Poisonous metals including cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in inexcusable portions. At the very least, there should be laws on the purity of the liquid.
And you're what is called an "apologist". A relatively modest tax. It's not a tax, it's a penalty for not obeying herr Fuehrer Hussein's dictate, and it's not relatively modest, it's multiple hundreds of dollars and gets larger each year.
Responsible people pay their own medical bills; you're libeling doctorvo when you claim that others would be paying his medical bills.
FWIW, there are many legal ways to avoid both buying insurance and paying the penalty.
Those things are an open invitation for mice, chipmunks, squirrels, skunks, and raccoons, which can otherwise be excluded by using an elevated feeder. Nevertheless, thanks for the link.
Dealing with a company that's in trouble means an increased risk losing your money. If you can't afford to lose your money, deal with a healthy company with a good reputation.
Democrats - more specifically Progressives - take indoctrination seriously, which is why control of the educational system has been their goal and technique for over a century. They don't give a hoot about the quality of education, just what propaganda they can shove into students. There's a reason that rhetoric and informal logic are unknown in public schools.
Socioeconomic factors are in the middle, neither cause nor result. Poor quality people are poor parents, make a poor income, live in poor neighborhoods. It's the parents being poor quality people, more than other factors, that is the biggest factor in whether children of the same potential at birth learn well.
The High School you went to was a magnet school that probably had quotas, comparing it to the average high school experience isn't relevant.
You don't think that understanding what makes a magnet school effective is relevant to improving education?
Social polarization is not inherent in technology. One think that does happen, is that seductive liars find it easier to spread their messages. This is the fault of evil people, not technology.
Public education in the U.S. is primarily state and local. Federal funding is wrong and very, very dangerous: with money comes control. That control includes what can and cannot be taught in history classes, whether violence as a political technique is praised or condemned, whether and what sort of racism is promoted, whether literature studies great people or slackers, and so forth.
Teachers are hounded out of the business if they don't parrot the political bias of the department head, principal, superintendent. Good teachers won't work under such conditions, hacks do.
I find it hard to imagine any teacher in any subject before 10th grade being worth more than $50,000/year. The material isn't difficult and teaching isn't difficult.
The sort of person who would freely join a union is unfit to teach.
"Special education" is frequently exorbitantly expensive, more expensive than one full-time tutor per student (easily over $100,000 per year). The return on investment is zilch, and certainly not a responsible use of taxpayer money. If a child's mental potential is limited to basket weaving, spending 12 years in a futile effort to teach him to read does no good.
Try teaching kids who are hungry, exhausted, and homeless
Don't change the subject. That condition describes very few children, and is irrelevant to the central issue of education being poor for most students.
Stop teaching garbage like Common Core and the latest Politically Correct dung.
When you look for a new large center for your business, one of the things you should actively avoid is a city with legendary levels of corruption. Chicago, New York, Boston, and New Orleans should be rejected without further consideration.
Slashdot Mirror
Just sit here. We're going to accelerate your plans.
Apparently the manufacturers of ecig supplies are making very poor quality products. Poisonous metals including cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in inexcusable portions. At the very least, there should be laws on the purity of the liquid.
There's a large gap between "loud and obnoxious", and "loud and obnoxious enough to get arrested".
And you're what is called an "apologist". A relatively modest tax. It's not a tax, it's a penalty for not obeying herr Fuehrer Hussein's dictate, and it's not relatively modest, it's multiple hundreds of dollars and gets larger each year.
Responsible people pay their own medical bills; you're libeling doctorvo when you claim that others would be paying his medical bills.
FWIW, there are many legal ways to avoid both buying insurance and paying the penalty.
Moses would be so proud.
Those things are an open invitation for mice, chipmunks, squirrels, skunks, and raccoons, which can otherwise be excluded by using an elevated feeder. Nevertheless, thanks for the link.
I almost feel sorry for someone who thinks Hillary doesn't look bad.
Dealing with a company that's in trouble means an increased risk losing your money. If you can't afford to lose your money, deal with a healthy company with a good reputation.
March XP
You make it too easy. Correlation is not causation.
Democrats - more specifically Progressives - take indoctrination seriously, which is why control of the educational system has been their goal and technique for over a century. They don't give a hoot about the quality of education, just what propaganda they can shove into students. There's a reason that rhetoric and informal logic are unknown in public schools.
Socioeconomic factors are in the middle, neither cause nor result. Poor quality people are poor parents, make a poor income, live in poor neighborhoods. It's the parents being poor quality people, more than other factors, that is the biggest factor in whether children of the same potential at birth learn well.
You don't think that understanding what makes a magnet school effective is relevant to improving education?
A reward that low for effort that high usually comes about from government interference.
That may be Protestantism, with the insistence that anyone be able to read the Bible.
Social polarization is not inherent in technology. One think that does happen, is that seductive liars find it easier to spread their messages. This is the fault of evil people, not technology.
Public education in the U.S. is primarily state and local. Federal funding is wrong and very, very dangerous: with money comes control. That control includes what can and cannot be taught in history classes, whether violence as a political technique is praised or condemned, whether and what sort of racism is promoted, whether literature studies great people or slackers, and so forth.
In electrical engineering, some tools are available on multiple OSs, many Windows only, some Solaris, some Linux, ...
Teachers are hounded out of the business if they don't parrot the political bias of the department head, principal, superintendent. Good teachers won't work under such conditions, hacks do.
I find it hard to imagine any teacher in any subject before 10th grade being worth more than $50,000/year. The material isn't difficult and teaching isn't difficult.
The sort of person who would freely join a union is unfit to teach.
"Special education" is frequently exorbitantly expensive, more expensive than one full-time tutor per student (easily over $100,000 per year). The return on investment is zilch, and certainly not a responsible use of taxpayer money. If a child's mental potential is limited to basket weaving, spending 12 years in a futile effort to teach him to read does no good.
The claim that schools need more money is false. In 2013, the average spent per pupil was $10,700. The correlation between money per pupil and educational outcome is very weak and not always positive. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=gradreports [pdf],
Don't change the subject. That condition describes very few children, and is irrelevant to the central issue of education being poor for most students.
Stop teaching garbage like Common Core and the latest Politically Correct dung.
Progressives.
When you look for a new large center for your business, one of the things you should actively avoid is a city with legendary levels of corruption. Chicago, New York, Boston, and New Orleans should be rejected without further consideration.
Unless the city government is corrupt, if the assessed value of all houses doubles then the mil rate falls by half, leaving total taxes constant.
It's obvious why you can't get a job. Some day, if you ever grow up, you might try re-reading your post.
Quod erat demonstrandum.
Why are you posting on slashdot instead of using the internet to search for a job?