Uh, no. Those references refer to limits on people's activity, not God's. The God of the Bible is always portrayed as being unlimited in power. The episodes in book of Judges do show that God limits his intervention in human affairs, but iron chariots do not pose a problem (Judges 4:13-15).
So... do you use a password on your accounts? After all, that's security through obscurity, right?
Absolutley not! A password is merely a secret value that's a part of a known security process, there's nothing obsecure about it at all.
When talking about security, obsecurity means you don't let others know how your security process works, otherwise they'd be able to figure out how to easily crack it. Good security means your process can't be easily cracked even if the process is known.
Actually, if you still have payments on your loan and your loan is with GMAC, then yes, GM can sue you.
What? I don't think so. If you trade in a vehicle financed under GMAC, the dealer is going to happily roll those last payments into your new loan. Everybody gets their money, and GMAC will care less if you still have a GM-made car.
I find it interesting that this is usually an argument used to support GNU/Linux. Since the functionality is not available right out of the box (giving points for being painfully obvious) then it is not relevant to the discussion because Joe User is not guarenteed of being skilled enough to find/install it on the system. In this case XP is still playing catch-up to X Windows.
KDE was more "windows-esque" to me, and while I know that's a bad thing for a bunch of people, for me, it helps with the learning curve being greatly reduced for my everyday tasks.
I've never quite understood this viewpoint. There's not much difference between GNOME and KDE -- other than cosmetic (ex: KDE has bigger icons).
I currently use (and prefer) GNOME, but then my path was Win NT -> Solaris CDE -> GNOME, so that might color my perception differently.
Slashdot Mirror
Uh, no. Those references refer to limits on people's activity, not God's. The God of the Bible is always portrayed as being unlimited in power. The episodes in book of Judges do show that God limits his intervention in human affairs, but iron chariots do not pose a problem (Judges 4:13-15).
I know there's a joke about geeks and hygine there just waiting to be said, but I can't quite find it.
Absolutley not! A password is merely a secret value that's a part of a known security process, there's nothing obsecure about it at all.
When talking about security, obsecurity means you don't let others know how your security process works, otherwise they'd be able to figure out how to easily crack it. Good security means your process can't be easily cracked even if the process is known.
Actually, if you still have payments on your loan and your loan is with GMAC, then yes, GM can sue you.
What? I don't think so. If you trade in a vehicle financed under GMAC, the dealer is going to happily roll those last payments into your new loan. Everybody gets their money, and GMAC will care less if you still have a GM-made car.
I find it interesting that this is usually an argument used to support GNU/Linux. Since the
functionality is not available right out of the box (giving points for being painfully obvious) then it is not relevant to the discussion because Joe User is not guarenteed of being skilled enough to find/install it on the system. In this case XP is still playing catch-up to X Windows.
- Eudora
- Opera
- OpenOffice.org
- Grisoft's AVG
The only thing I want to know is when is GnuCash going to be ported to windows (or is that tantamount to blasphemy)?KDE was more "windows-esque" to me, and while I know that's a bad thing for a bunch of people, for me, it helps with the learning curve being greatly reduced for my everyday tasks.
I've never quite understood this viewpoint. There's not much difference between GNOME and KDE -- other than cosmetic (ex: KDE has bigger icons).
I currently use (and prefer) GNOME, but then my path was Win NT -> Solaris CDE -> GNOME, so that might color my perception differently.