And they called me mad for espousing the Grassy Knoll theory. MAD!
Maybe next I'll be vindicated on UFOs, Bigfoot, Watergate, Moon Landings, and the truth behind Mulder's sister's kidnapping.
Would we be able to use OCR software to pull text from the pictures? Then we could subject the image spam to standard filters.
Frankly, I'd do anything to stop receiving these retarded pump-n-dump-stock spams.
When will Microsoft and its execs realize that the competition Linux brings is healthy for their business and code in the long run? The drive to perfection is fueled by comparisons to one's competitor's. If your OS isn't as robust as their's, improve its reliability. If your protocol isn't as efficient, work on the algos. Customers are drawn to reliable products. They will thank you for the better code.
But we live in the world of business. Muscle techniques bring a larger market share. Quality can be thrown to the wayside if your campaign is catchy. The questions I pose to this forum:
1) Are we (the tech crowd) to blame for Microsoft's newest attack-strategy?
Slashdot Mirror
And they called me mad for espousing the Grassy Knoll theory. MAD! Maybe next I'll be vindicated on UFOs, Bigfoot, Watergate, Moon Landings, and the truth behind Mulder's sister's kidnapping.
I would have read TFA, but it was sadly blocked by the corporate firewall. That said, it sounds interesting.
Would we be able to use OCR software to pull text from the pictures? Then we could subject the image spam to standard filters. Frankly, I'd do anything to stop receiving these retarded pump-n-dump-stock spams.
But we live in the world of business. Muscle techniques bring a larger market share. Quality can be thrown to the wayside if your campaign is catchy. The questions I pose to this forum:
1) Are we (the tech crowd) to blame for Microsoft's newest attack-strategy?
2) How can we stop it?
3) Should we?