Slashdot Mirror


User: cetan

cetan's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
607
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 607

  1. Re:IMAP support on T-Mobile Sidekick Reviewed · · Score: 1

    That's where SquirrelMail Lite would be good. Just browse your way to your IMAP folders. http://rumkin.com/sm-lite/patch/readme.html.

  2. Re:PuTTY on The Best of Windows Open Source Software? · · Score: 1

    No, what you know are users that should be using ssh but don't understand why plaintext passwords are a problem. Everyone has a need for better security, most just don't know they're not secure to begin with.

  3. Re:Phoenix rocks on Roll Your Own Browser · · Score: 1

    Don't confuse small numbers with poor release performance. The underlying Mozilla code is from the 1.2 branch. You're running Mozilla 1.2 in a new (and fresh?) way.

  4. from the article on PCs Losing Out as a Gaming Platform? · · Score: 1

    Fewer and fewer of the latest titles will run on a PC.

    It seems to me that this is no different than the consoles. If you don't own both a PS2 and an X-Box, then you're going to miss out on a lot of good games. Personally, I can't see dropping that kind of cash just for gaming.

  5. Re:Good timing on Mozilla Jumps on 'Lean Browser' Bandwagon · · Score: 1

    Good call on the specifics. I believe you are correct. My original point was, though, to point out that just because it says "0.1" doesn't mean the underlying code is 0.1 quality.

    I guess I assumed from their roadmap page that states:

    Because we're working from the stable base provided by the mature Mozilla trunk

    it was an indication of released code only. But if they consider 1.2b stable enough, then I'm glad they're using it.

  6. Re:Good timing on Mozilla Jumps on 'Lean Browser' Bandwagon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Phoenix is based off of the 1.0 branch of code. You're already at 1.0 as far as mozilla is concerned. They call it 0.1 for the projects purposes.

  7. pictures of the camera on 13.8MP Kodak Tops Previously Leaked Canon · · Score: 2, Informative

    dpreview.com is running quite a bit of news about Photokina 2002. They've even got 2 images of the new Kodak. (Note: that's /of/ not /from/).

    http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02092304kodakdcs 14n.asp

  8. gray/grey hats on Ethical Lines of the Gray Hat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's a bit ironic that the c|net article tried to put such a boundry around so-called "gray-hat" hacking. I'm sure there's a number of "gray hats" that don't release the info about a security problem until after a suitable time period has passed and the company has either not responded or is not being speedy enough in issuing a patch.


    It seems to me that giving companies time to fix their holes is always a Good Thing (tm) but that a lack of public disclosure by a 3rd-party will only help obscure legitimate problems. People with the attitudes similar to that of Peter Lindstrom* demonstrate, to me at least, a lack of care towards users and their potentialy open/vulnerable systems. One of the easiest ways to get a slow company to fix something seems to be to talk about it in the press.


    * quote: ("If you are gray, you are black," Lindstrom said. "It's not that I don't understand what they are trying to do, but it comes down to what you are actually doing.)

  9. Re:It's about time on Pictures Leaked of 3 new Palm handhelds · · Score: 1

    I was back and forth on this price issue for months. I finally saw a good deal on the m500 for $175 after rebate and I got one. I think it's been well worth the money thus far but I certainly wouldn't spend anything more than that for a PDA.

  10. for the "important stuff" on Handling Email Overload in Congress · · Score: 1

    For important things I've given up on email. It's far too easy to get lost in the shuffle. Of course it takes longer, costs more, and can easily be lost by the USPS, but once it gets there, it's far less likely to be overlooked.

    Plus, since I got my m500 my handwriting has gone from bad to worse. I need something to get back to writing letters people can read :)

  11. Re:STOP THE BITCHSLAPPING MICHAEL!! on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I've writen to jeff and rob about his abuses. I'm waiting to see if they really respond. I'd be suprised and happy if they did but I'm not expecting them to.

  12. Re:playing down the "firing" on Perens Pushes "Sincere Choice" for Software · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Egos are a part of life. Look at today. Michael, the most megalomanical editor on /. dropped me 30 mod points today because he didn't like what I said. I don't consider michael anything close to bruce's intelligence. I think he'll be able to pull off something here.

  13. playing down the "firing" on Perens Pushes "Sincere Choice" for Software · · Score: 1

    It's probably a good thing that he's playing down his departure from HP. It shows that he's already put it behind him and is ready for the next challenge. Now, I'm not 100% behind him on Sincere Choice but it's a move in the right direction for sure.

  14. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Uh oh. I'm down from "Excellent" karma to "Good" now. I count close to 30 mod points lost today because of michael. I'd rather not let him get me all the way to negative karma so I'll end here. Let this thread stand as a testament to the abuses of the moderation system and the lack of intelligence michael has.

  15. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Nah, Taco et all don't care. They've never cared actually. michael has got free reign on his stories and over his moderation abuse. I don't think Taco or anyone has ever issued an apology for some of michaels worse offenses.

  16. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Must be fun to hide behind unlimited mod points. I'm glad you're so powerful. This thread is just proof that you can not handle the responsability of being an editor.

  17. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    If he's not been fired by now, he's never going to get fired. /. hired him either because he has pictures of someone or because they're blind to his behavior.

  18. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    How about some more? I'm happy to contribute to the "michael needs a life" fund.

  19. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This is fun. Thanks mike. I'm glad I'm making you feel good about yourself. At least I'm doing something worthwhile, unlike your existance.

  20. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    See what I mean? It's sad but true.

    Hi michael. Thanks for stopping by. Looks like I'll have to make a few intelligent posts now to make up for the losses here. At least I'll be adding more to this site than you ever will.

  21. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Editors have unlimited mod points. He doesn't have any fans, he actually modded down your posts. He stalked and tracked you. He's a child with a gun and no one is going to win in that situation.

  22. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What's really amazing is that michael thinks he is in the right. He is so blinded by his own self-worth that he honestly believes he is doing the right thing here. It's so sad to see someone throw good intelligence down the drain.

  23. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    That's ok. I know what sort of child he is. I expect nothing less from him than a tantrum.

  24. Re:Shut it Michael. on BASF Shows Off Some Tantalizing Nanotech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    So if nothing was said or even implied in your sentence, then it obviously has no value and should have never been added to the story.

    But of course it does say something. It says "I feel so important as an editor I have to add my 2 cents in everywhere, even when there's no reason to."

  25. Re:Why do we need "one unified" desktop? on Red Hat Explains Stance on KDE/Gnome Desktop Changes · · Score: 1

    I wish I had mod points for you. Great post.