It works, as opposed to it works in theory. I would also say the electric car is further along than LFTR, even though they do not do the same task. I was not comparing their suitability only the insane claim that LFTR was ready to be used for serious work.
Haha no. What would happens is agency 1 and 2 and 3 would all sell data to clearinghouses 4,5 and 6. The Government or anyone really would just go to the clearinghouses to get it.
The difference is it now makes it possible to track your movements at all time.
I would say even in the case of officers recording this data by hand they should have to dispose of it after some amount of time. No good can come of this type of thing, only bad.
Normally early trial patients are paid, they normally have no medical problem to treat they are safety Guinea pigs. Clearly the doctors you are talking about are skipping some steps.
If they make claims they should have to prove them.
Otherwise I can sell a drug that claims to cure your inability to read, then convince your doctor by sending over a hot pharma rep and charge you thousands for sugar pills.
Comparisons would be people who have used them before, the USA, people lying about having them already, Israel, and those who are not state actors, terror groups.
Iran like all state actors has MAD to keep them from doing anything to crazy. I was not suggesting Iran was a nice country, merely that like all state actors they are not the ones we should be worried about.
Iran will not be killing any westerners soon, so no worries about making sure they get me first.
How much power did they sell to the public from that plant?
I am only rude because you suggest replacing something that works now with something no one has yet made work, then make the insane claim that this unproven thing is so much better.
Your worldview is pie in the sky.
I have no problem exploring more power options, but for now lets use those wind plants I drive past to work each morning.
Coal is only cheapest because it can externalize its waste disposal cost. If the Nuclear power plants were allowed to just dump their waste into the air that would bring down costs quite a bit.
The costs are comparable if clean air and medical costs for those impacted have a value.
So your reactor no one has built and used is ok for important stuff but well developed and currently in use wind power is too much of a gamble for important uses?
I think we can all feel free to ignore your opinions on this topic based on that kind of nonsense.
Patent medicine has nothing to do with patents. You should look into why the FDA was created.
The problem with your idea and it was tried in the past is that the information cannot spread as fast as these folks change their names and companies. If I need to go the ER for bleeding from my anus I cannot read every review on yelp to see which doctor will save my life. The profit the more likely those reviews will be tampered with.
Lasik eye regulations exist and ensure safety. Veterinary care is not cheap, I just paid $1500 for a dental procedure on an animal. It would have been more on a human, but that is again because of the value of the patient. Even at $1500 many humans could not afford such a treatment.
Because under the actual free market, before the government stepped it al all, we had patent medicine and people were dying from it. We founded the FDA because the free market failed to provide care. Instead it provided untested and useless garbage at low low prices.
Lasik eye surgery is not a free market at all. Those are regulated medical devices they use. Pet care comes mostly from human care, the human care paid all the costs. The risks are also much lower as the value of the patient is far lower.
How do we know it has a high potential of doing that?
Please show us the studies. What we have instead is you suggesting we try random untested procedures instead of pain management that we know works. I would imagine the risk of unsightly hair is more manageable for the patient than a totally unknown outcome for what may well be no actual improvement at all.
Slashdot Mirror
It works, as opposed to it works in theory. I would also say the electric car is further along than LFTR, even though they do not do the same task. I was not comparing their suitability only the insane claim that LFTR was ready to be used for serious work.
Obvious Astroturfer is obvious.
In what state is that legal?
Haha no.
What would happens is agency 1 and 2 and 3 would all sell data to clearinghouses 4,5 and 6. The Government or anyone really would just go to the clearinghouses to get it.
The difference is it now makes it possible to track your movements at all time.
I would say even in the case of officers recording this data by hand they should have to dispose of it after some amount of time. No good can come of this type of thing, only bad.
Absolutely, but let us not pretend that right now LFTR is further along than wind power.
Normally early trial patients are paid, they normally have no medical problem to treat they are safety Guinea pigs. Clearly the doctors you are talking about are skipping some steps.
They do not mean the same thing at all.
No one harvested a fetus via abortion then took stem cells from it.
I said nothing about safety, only labeling.
If they make claims they should have to prove them.
Otherwise I can sell a drug that claims to cure your inability to read, then convince your doctor by sending over a hot pharma rep and charge you thousands for sugar pills.
Comparisons would be people who have used them before, the USA, people lying about having them already, Israel, and those who are not state actors, terror groups.
Iran like all state actors has MAD to keep them from doing anything to crazy. I was not suggesting Iran was a nice country, merely that like all state actors they are not the ones we should be worried about.
Iran will not be killing any westerners soon, so no worries about making sure they get me first.
Those are threats of violence made in public. Such things are already going to get someone arrested. No need for a new law.
They can provide useful labor.
How much power did they sell to the public from that plant?
I am only rude because you suggest replacing something that works now with something no one has yet made work, then make the insane claim that this unproven thing is so much better.
Your worldview is pie in the sky.
I have no problem exploring more power options, but for now lets use those wind plants I drive past to work each morning.
Coal is only cheapest because it can externalize its waste disposal cost. If the Nuclear power plants were allowed to just dump their waste into the air that would bring down costs quite a bit.
The costs are comparable if clean air and medical costs for those impacted have a value.
Go away Malthus.
They need to invest in infrastructure, less people able to pay for that is not going to help the issue.
Too bad the mountains of pakistan are a totally worthless place to put a data center.
So your reactor no one has built and used is ok for important stuff but well developed and currently in use wind power is too much of a gamble for important uses?
I think we can all feel free to ignore your opinions on this topic based on that kind of nonsense.
You don't verify. Iran as a state is not a huge nuclear weapons threat. The real fear is someone selling these weapons to non-state actors.
States fear MAD, non-state actors have no such concerns.
Spain is terrible economy no matter what. Has been forever.
Look at Norway then tell me those taxes are hurting them.
So then take it to SCOTUS.
People smarter than you have tried and failed.
Patent medicine has nothing to do with patents. You should look into why the FDA was created.
The problem with your idea and it was tried in the past is that the information cannot spread as fast as these folks change their names and companies. If I need to go the ER for bleeding from my anus I cannot read every review on yelp to see which doctor will save my life. The profit the more likely those reviews will be tampered with.
Lasik eye regulations exist and ensure safety. Veterinary care is not cheap, I just paid $1500 for a dental procedure on an animal. It would have been more on a human, but that is again because of the value of the patient. Even at $1500 many humans could not afford such a treatment.
When was this?
Because under the actual free market, before the government stepped it al all, we had patent medicine and people were dying from it. We founded the FDA because the free market failed to provide care. Instead it provided untested and useless garbage at low low prices.
Lasik eye surgery is not a free market at all. Those are regulated medical devices they use. Pet care comes mostly from human care, the human care paid all the costs. The risks are also much lower as the value of the patient is far lower.
Any other bullshit you want me to debunk for you.
I claim I have a magic rock that has an 11000% percent success rate.
I suggest we actually test both of them, with a real double blind study. Some folks get saline some get this crap.
I suggest you test out that theory. Call up the IRS and tell them all about your plan to not pay. See how it works out.
How do we know it has a high potential of doing that?
Please show us the studies. What we have instead is you suggesting we try random untested procedures instead of pain management that we know works. I would imagine the risk of unsightly hair is more manageable for the patient than a totally unknown outcome for what may well be no actual improvement at all.