How so? Steampunk could be on any planet, at any time, with little to no problem. All it needs are fancy clothes, overly elaborate gadgets and some dirigibles.
I don't see that as a problem. I also do not see why you would see that as a problem.
Innovation, like quality often has very little to do with success in business. Microsoft is a great example of that. Access is an even better example, it is a terrible product with no innovation and even worse on the quality front. Every single time I have seen anything done in it, it had to be done again with a real DB and at a cost higher than just doing that way to begin with, since we often had to support design decisions made by people who had no idea what they were doing. It is however a very successful product in the business sense.
T-mobile $30/month if you are ok with only 100 minutes of voice. If you also want unlimited minutes it is $60. Only a portion of the data is at 4G(not really 4G , just like the rest of them), but they do not cut you off.
No, I read the design patent. Its biggest design feature seems to be the rounded corners. I am not sure how they even qualify as non-functional. Sharp corners would be uncomfortable to hold.
What stops that dev from spending another $99 on another dev account? Not that hard or expensive to kill your old corporation, start another and get a new AMEX.
Slashdot Mirror
How so?
Steampunk could be on any planet, at any time, with little to no problem. All it needs are fancy clothes, overly elaborate gadgets and some dirigibles.
There are 20+ dune novels, even more books about dune, and comics. There are also movies and tv shows.
How is a steampunk setting any different than a post-apocalyptic setting or a space setting or an alien world setting?
I don't see that as a problem. I also do not see why you would see that as a problem.
Innovation, like quality often has very little to do with success in business. Microsoft is a great example of that. Access is an even better example, it is a terrible product with no innovation and even worse on the quality front. Every single time I have seen anything done in it, it had to be done again with a real DB and at a cost higher than just doing that way to begin with, since we often had to support design decisions made by people who had no idea what they were doing. It is however a very successful product in the business sense.
I agree it is what many companies do, but it is not innovative in the least.
Use the plugin Phony.
I use it to always get the desktop version of sites on my galaxy nexus with firefox.
Get a Nexus.
So letting people die in the gutter is moral?
Foxconn is not the only builder of phones, by a long shot.
Why would that be a problem?
The game engine can be GPL and actual interesting parts the art and scripts can be under some other license. This is the same boat DOOM1-3 are in now.
T-mobile $30/month if you are ok with only 100 minutes of voice. If you also want unlimited minutes it is $60. Only a portion of the data is at 4G(not really 4G , just like the rest of them), but they do not cut you off.
They innovate in the field of selling your supposedly secured data to tinpot dictators.
So now buying products and gluing them together is innovative?
What would be innovative is if they let people glue their own stuff together by opening up those protocols for interoperability.
Obvious troll is obvious.
Guys, for the good of the internet don't respond to these kinds of posts.
Why? Do you think powerpoint was critical in getting actual work done?
If so I have a bridge to sell you.
Looks great, where do I find cocoa and all that graphical jazz?
I learned how much of a dick you are and how foolish you are. Go ahead and not pay the IRS, let me know how that works out.
If something is really worth doing, it is worth doing it without the profit motive.
Not too old for care, but likely too old for any of the care those tests would indicate.
What exactly is a 70 year old going to do when an EKG shows he needs open heart surgery he will not survive?
No, I read the design patent. Its biggest design feature seems to be the rounded corners. I am not sure how they even qualify as non-functional. Sharp corners would be uncomfortable to hold.
What stops that dev from spending another $99 on another dev account?
Not that hard or expensive to kill your old corporation, start another and get a new AMEX.
It might have been obvious, but it was also wrong. The majority of it is made in the USA. Even the power supply and the PCB.
Better yet, give her gold or silver.
They can be bought and sold via the oz price and she could get a fair price for them. Resale value of jewelry is horrible.
Because there are lots of them and more and more would open.
So then they did not test it after building it?
Dev sends app and hash to apple. Apple distributes and has end devices check hash at install time, if hash no match download again.
Exactly where does this problem slip in without anyone noticing?
I actually did read that patent and I am not sure how "patent on rounded rectangles" is not a decent summary. I even looked at the diagrams.
Please elaborate on what you think a simple summary of the pantent should include.
I would imagine they would differ, it is hard to convince someone to act against their own pocketbook.