Slashdot Mirror


Nexus Q Stretches "Made in USA" Label

sl4shd0rk writes "Among the much ballyhooed tech at Google I/O last week was the Google Nexus Q. Google made an effort to proudly point out the device was "Made in the USA" and even had it stamped on the back of it. A tear-down at ifixit.com however, reveals the guts of the thing are mostly manufactured overseas at the expected locations (China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, et al). Wired also posted a tear-down in which they reveal a die-casting shop in Wisconsin is the source of the zinc housing, but certainly not the entire device as some news sources reported. It's great that Google decided to utilize the struggling U.S. manufacturing sector for this, but claiming the device is USA made, and being blatantly vague about its origins is quite misleading." How struggling the U.S. manufacturing sector is depends on who you ask and how you measure, remember.

241 comments

  1. "Blatantly vague"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot should really consider hiring an editor.

    1. Re:"Blatantly vague"? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      The summary is bogus in another respect - I don't believe the "Made in USA" thing was mentioned at all during I/O. It certainly wasn't in the presentation, that's not accurate, let alone "made a proud effort". It's something that got picked up based on a few frames of the promotional video that showed the insides.

    2. Re:"Blatantly vague"? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      The summary is bogus in another respect - I don't believe the "Made in USA" thing was mentioned at all during I/O.

      It wasn't, but there's a label stamped onto the bottom of the device itself that says, "Designed and manufactured in the USA." Some people have suggested that it probably should read "assembled," rather than "manufactured."

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:"Blatantly vague"? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      It's still considered to be manufactured in the US just like iPhones are manufactured in China by Foxconn despite most of the components coming from Taiwan and South Korea.

  2. No, it isn't misleading by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The housing and assembly is done in the US.

    The article is from someone who will go to pedantic lengths to justify their hate.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is misleading. There is an implied meaning in the "Made in the USA" label that they're trying to take advantage of.

    2. Re:No, it isn't misleading by David89 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some US production is way better than none

      --
      Track IP - Remotely track the IP address of a machine via email or MySQL.
    3. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this. Everybody knows that there is no electronic anything "made" in the USA.

    4. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Xest · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, even with shit that's made in China you can claim the oil required for the plastics came from Iran or wherever the fuck.

      Normally "Made in" refers to the final assembled products, not necessarily every constituent component. America may not even have the facilities to produce every single last component but fundamentally even bringing assembly to the US is a step more than most other companies are doing.

      This story is just another desperate clutching at straws troll.

    5. Re:No, it isn't misleading by hiroshii · · Score: 2

      Agreed. When do you ever see an electronics product state "Made in China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, etc."? It's the final step that matters and there's always only one country mentioned.

    6. Re:No, it isn't misleading by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      "Made in the USA" and "Assembled in the USA from foreign and domestic parts" have substantially different meanings, and Google is using the wrong one of these phrases in order to fool fools.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:No, it isn't misleading by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should put "Designed by Google in California."

    8. Re:No, it isn't misleading by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is an implied meaning in the "Made in the USA" label that they're trying to take advantage of.

      Nobody who knows anything about electronics thinks that the entire Q is made from raw minerals in the USA.

      Heck, the Q is more 'Made in the USA' than many automobiles advertised as such.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Speaking as someone who's worked with Customs for years, once you have a product broken down and the parts identified, it can be quite easy to tell if it's made in the USA... from a legal standpoint:

      http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/nafta-alena/texte/anx401a.aspx?lang=en&view=d

      Annex 401 specific rules of origin. To summarize, there's various methods by which you can determine the country of origin of something if the parts are all made elsewhere. If all of the parts qualify for Annex 401, or the value of all non-US origin parts is less than say... 40% of the total value (can't remember the exact percentage, can't be bothered to look it up, but you get the general idea), then that there is a made in USA product.

      Technically, you can have an item with absolutely zero individual pieces of it made in the USA, but if the final product is assembled here, and it qualifies in having the right tariff code changes, then that just became made in the USA.

    10. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      Yes.
      And it is the same for devices made in China. The final assembly is done there since they beat everyone in this with low wages and small profit margins. The expensive parts that require specialists and experience are often made somewhere else.

    11. Re:No, it isn't misleading by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      This is what Nokia does - my N900 says "Designed in Finland" on the back. It was made in South Korea (but that's not written anywhere on the outside of it).

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    12. Re:No, it isn't misleading by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      To be fair the average Joe won't know to take that into account when considering how much of this thing is actually made in the US.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    13. Re:No, it isn't misleading by synapse7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not trying to justify any hate, but maybe it should read assembled in the USA? Also, is there a threshold for electronics to meet for made in the USA?

    14. Re:No, it isn't misleading by GameboyRMH · · Score: 0

      Well then Apple should just have a robot in the US snap the last piece of their iShinies on and say that all their products are made in the USA!

      I'm no Google hater but most of the Nexus Q's internals weren't made in the US.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:No, it isn't misleading by halber_mensch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, even with shit that's made in China you can claim the oil required for the plastics came from Iran or wherever the fuck.

      Quite obviously the heavy elements in the chemical compounds were not created by fusing lighter elements in a lab in Mountain View. Those lying bastards, "made in the USA" my ass. More like "made in the collapse of RX J185635-3754."

      --
      perl -e "eval pack(q{H*},join q{},qw{70 72696e74207061636b28717b482a7d2c717b343 637323635363534323533343430617d293b})"
    16. Re:No, it isn't misleading by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

      Counterexample: Me. If I see "Made in the USA", I wouldn't expect to find out it had been made in China. Leaving aside the reasons behind, and impact of, labeling something "Made in the USA" - if it isn't - it is false advertising.

    17. Re:No, it isn't misleading by oakgrove · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most of Nexus Q's non-silicon parts were made in the USA, including the die-cast zinc base. You're kidding yourself if you think that falls in the realm of "assembled in the USA" vs. "Made in the USA".

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    18. Re:No, it isn't misleading by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Heck, the Q is more 'Made in the USA' than many automobiles advertised as such.

      I bought a new car earlier this year. I wanted to "buy American", so I looked into where the cars were made, and were the components were made. Of the cars I considered, the "most American" was a Honda.

    19. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All manufacturing is menial work.
      That's why people thought it would be a good idea to move the menial work somewhere else so we could free up our workforce for more qualified work, like designing making the machines needed for the manufacturing. Problem was, most people who had menial work had it for a reason.

      Now I would rather have lots of people with menial work rather than letting them go unemployed.

    20. Re:No, it isn't misleading by slimjim8094 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you similarly object to computers "made in China" but using chips made in the USA and Israel?

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    21. Re:No, it isn't misleading by russotto · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not trying to justify any hate, but maybe it should read assembled in the USA? Also, is there a threshold for electronics to meet for made in the USA?

      The FTC standard is that "all or virtually all" the components are made in the USA. And if you look at iFixit, you find that virtually all the major components were or could have been made in the USA; they didn't check the lot numbers to see if the parts which are made in multiple countries were, in fact, made in the US. While in general if you order a bunch of parts from a supplier you get them from wherever the supplier chooses to send them from, I'm sure that's negotiable.

      (Disclosure: I work for Google, but not on the Nexus Q)

    22. Re:No, it isn't misleading by slimjim8094 · · Score: 2

      Do you similarly object to computers saying they're "made in China" but using chips made in the USA and Israel?

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    23. Re:No, it isn't misleading by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Counterexample: Me. If I see "Made in the USA", I wouldn't expect to find out it had been made in China.

      So, you expect all parts, pieces, components, and processes materials to be made, from raw materials, in the USA if it has that label?

      Do the raw materials have to be mined or grown here as well?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    24. Re:No, it isn't misleading by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      There's a significant difference between the people needed to do what Google is having done in the US, essentially operating a screwdriver - a job that doesn't require literacy, skill, or really even sight - and other types of manufacturing that resemble skilled labor more closely.

    25. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2

      The article is from someone who will go to pedantic lengths to justify their hate.

      Of course! By the same token, you'll see Google "fans" go through the same exercise when an article mentions their "nemesis".

      Every thread that mentions Apple, Google, Microsoft, etc will generate comments from both fans and foes. This is why websites gravitate to articles that mention these brands despite its newsworthiness.

      Anyway this article is one of those "no shit sherlock" articles that points out the obvious that Google was doing this as a PR stunt. There isn't any real commitment being made to keep the facility open nor to increase the number of domestic parts being used. The fact that only the final assembly is being done in the US is used mostly for PR and possibly as political cover from Apple's (and Microsoft's, Nokia's, etc.) attempts to block importation due to patent infringement, since technically only the parts are being imported not the media device.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    26. Re:No, it isn't misleading by kubernet3s · · Score: 1

      Anybody who knows anything about electronics bought a Roku already. This is a marketing gimmick targeting people who don't know better. People should know better, that is true, but just because someone is stupid doesn't mean tricking them is okay.

    27. Re:No, it isn't misleading by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Yes. "Made in" labels are stupid. They might mean something if you're manufacturing pencils and all the raw materials are made and processed in the same country. For electronics they're silly.

    28. Re:No, it isn't misleading by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      If I build a trophy out of lego and put it on a bit of wood I made, it doesn't change the fact 95% of the trophy was made elsewhere. Assembling it doesn't change that.

    29. Re:No, it isn't misleading by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Manufacturing ICs isn't all that menial.

    30. Re:No, it isn't misleading by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Nice research. I wonder if anybody published such a metric?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    31. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Which would make it more right to state "Assembled in the US from domestic and foreign parts."

      But it's interesting that the foreign parts are the high-tech parts and the domestic parts are the low tech parts.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    32. Re:No, it isn't misleading by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 0

      You're comparing someone buying a US made processor and putting it into a much larger device primarily made of Chinese bits, vs Google taking 90% Chinese work and slapping it inside a US case and calling it American made. It's not exactly the same scenario whether people agree or disagree with you.

    33. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of Nexus Q's non-silicon parts were made in the USA, including the die-cast zinc base.

      Since virtually all of the Nexus Q's value and function come from its silicon parts, I think this definitely falls into the realm of "assembled in USA." The parts that come from the USA amount to a fancy box to hold the device in.

    34. Re:No, it isn't misleading by slew · · Score: 1

      The housing and assembly is done in the US.

      So if I took bananas out of a crate and put them into a bag for retail sale in the US and the bag and the label was made in the US, would you be okay with a Made in the USA label on the bag?

      For the record, there are a few chips inside that are likely to have been made in the US, although they could have chosen some of the other high value chips to be so as well, but apparently didn't. They used an Elpida*** (fabs in japan/taiwan) DDR2 dram which might have been substituted with a Micron (fabs in Idaho) mobile dram. They used a Samsung Flash which is made in Korea (Samsung's Fab in TX is for Apple production, and I think Intel/Micron also makes a comparable flash manufactured in utah), and they OMAP processor was manufactured by TSMC in Taiwan, but they could have had the chips made in WaferTech (a TSMC compatible fab in Camus, WA)... But they didn't... Why? Probably because these options weren't available at a reasonable price.

      The article is from someone who will go to pedantic lengths to justify their hate.

      Maybe true, or maybe not, but that doesn't invalidate this question.

      ***recently Micron bought the bankrupt shell of japanese Elpida...

    35. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      the statistics are available. Here are a couple articles about those statistics.

      http://www.bankrate.com/finance/auto/is-your-car-american-made.aspx
      http://abcnews.go.com/Business/american-cars/story?id=13801165

    36. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you'd bothered to spend one minute looking at the component breakdown you'd know that your argument is completely false. The device is designed, manufactured and packaged in the US. Many of the components are made in the US. Some components obviously aren't, because it's not even possible to source them from US companies.

    37. Re:No, it isn't misleading by crazyjj · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe the "Made in the USA" on the label just meant the label itself.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    38. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody who knows anything about electronics thinks that the entire Q is made from raw minerals in the USA.

      Heck, the Q is more 'Made in the USA' than many automobiles advertised as such.

      This is news? About 10-15 years ago 60 minutes tore down an "American" car. They found out that just about the only part that was made in America was the "Proudly made in the USA" badge. Everything else was made overseas and assembled in the US. The US/UK dumped manufacturing and went for the "service economy", the Germans on the other hand stuck with manufacturing. Not that long ago the Chinese inked a $pound; 1 billion trade deal with the UK which looked really impressive until the same trade commission flew over the North Sea and inked a £ 9 billion deal with the Germans. I am sure some of your American readers can tell similar stories. Three cheers for the "service economy" (especially the financial services industry) !!!

    39. Re:No, it isn't misleading by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      You can swap around the nationalities any way you like, same problem IMO.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    40. Re:No, it isn't misleading by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      "could have been made" in the USA? Isn't that setting the bar rather low?

      I "could have" found a $20 bill on my way to work. I didn't; but it "could have" happened.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    41. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? There are No True Scotsmen.

    42. Re:No, it isn't misleading by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      When i read the Google i/O stuff, it was OBVIOUS that only the housing was really made in the USA.

      --
      Good-bye
    43. Re:No, it isn't misleading by coldfarnorth · · Score: 5, Informative

      The FTC requires that country-of-origin claims be assessed by portioning the manufacturing costs of the final product. A couple of dollars worth of foreign components/costs in an otherwise domestically sourced product that costs $300 is not considered to be an issue. If, on the other hand, the final product cost $5, then it's not acceptable to make a "Made in the USA" claim.

      Here is a link to the FTC page which describes the situation a bit more clearly, if not nearly so briefly.
      http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

      --
      Lets start refering to The War Against Terror by it's initials. . .
    44. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google taking 90% Chinese work and slapping it inside a US case and calling it American made

      90%? Really, do you have a citation for that or just talking out of your ass? Did you read any of the articles linked? Honestly their tone was more or less impressed with the percentages, the only negative spin was the really biased /. summary. Besides the die cast case, the molded base, PCBs *and* power supply were also made in the USA, which IMO was pretty damn surprising. Additionally, so were several of the sensors and chips. And the two most time consuming (and labor intensive) manufacturing steps, PCB stuffing and final assembly, were also done in the USA.

      So, basically, a few chips (some of which were US companies with fabs all over the world) and maybe a few stock nuts and bolts (but who knows as those aren't labeled) were made somewhere else. Honestly it appears they tried to source US parts and labor wherever they had a choice. Just because the US doesn't even make RAM any more doesn't mean the device can't be called "Made in the USA", jeez.

    45. Re:No, it isn't misleading by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      So if I sculpt a bust from marble that was sourced from Italy, that means the bust was "Made in Italy"? Are you really arguing that?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    46. Re:No, it isn't misleading by mr1911 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All manufacturing is menial work.

      A statement made by someone who clearly has no understanding of manufacturing.

      We spent years transitioning manufacturing offshore. Building factories, transferring knowledge, and building the skill of the workforce. Now we complain we can't manufacture anything.

      I really wish you were right about manufacturing being menial. That would mean it is a trivial task to start making things here. Unfortunately you are quite mistaken.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    47. Re:No, it isn't misleading by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      The criteria for legally stamping Made in USA amounts to cursory assembly. I knew a guy who worked at SENCO (American nail gun manufacturer) who told about how they would ship hardware (nail strips) from Asia, run them through a process to re-glue the nails (nail strips are held together by adhesive) and repackage them as Made in USA. It seems their customer base was adamant about their products being made in the USA. On a side note, I learned that American manufacturing output is higher than it ever has been. It's just that half of the 339,000 American manufacturers only employ 10 or less people each. Our efficiency has increased substantially.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    48. Re:No, it isn't misleading by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Google should know better. They just dont get the living room at all.

      --
      Good-bye
    49. Re:No, it isn't misleading by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Which in turn owes its energy to the Big Bang. Sagan said it best, "To make an apple pie from scratch, one must first invent the universe"

      --
      Good-bye
    50. Re:No, it isn't misleading by wift · · Score: 1

      Yes it is a sad fact we are left with such thoughts since those ex-jobs are permanently out sourced.

      --
      ....... Thus ends my attempt at wit or whatever
    51. Re:No, it isn't misleading by FitForTheSun · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL. Yeah, right. "Finland"? Dude if you're going to make up fake placenames, make them a little more believable. Pfft, "Finland" indeed.

    52. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you go through the whole teardown, only 2 parts (the Ethernet connector and an oscillator) were definitively shown to be made in China - that's probably less than 20 cents in parts for the whole device. Sure, there are a few chips and parts made in S. Korea or Thailand, and a few more from companies with fabs all over the world. The PCBs, PSU, case, base, chip stuffing, and assembly were apparently all done in the US. That's probably better than 90% of the other products labeled "Made in the USA" these days, so give it a rest...

      Now, can we stop confusing the debate and making shit up that wasn't even in any of the articles cited by this really misleading summary?

    53. Re:No, it isn't misleading by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Anybody who knows anything about electronics bought a Roku already.

      Oooh, please point me to instructions on how do do an XBMC install on a Roku.

      The one I've had for the past three years is getting long in the tooth, so it would be great to repurpose it and upgrade.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    54. Re:No, it isn't misleading by russotto · · Score: 2

      "could have been made" in the USA? Isn't that setting the bar rather low?

      That's not a standard, that's a true statement. If you claimed your nymsake car was "Made in the USA" and I opened the hood and found that the fuel injection system was of a model made in two factories, one in Germany and one in the US, wouldn't it make sense for me to check which of those two it was made in before claiming the car was not, in fact, "Made in the USA"

    55. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cars.com just released their yearly American-made index. Toyota has 3 (including #1 spot), GM 3, Honda 2, Ford 1, Jeep 1

      http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story.jsp?section=top&subject=ami&story=amMade0712

    56. Re:No, it isn't misleading by FitForTheSun · · Score: 1

      What? No, it's not. Of course it's not all menial work. A lot of it is, these days, but hardly all of it.

    57. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      The FTC requires that country-of-origin claims be assessed by portioning the manufacturing costs of the final product. A couple of dollars worth of foreign components/costs in an otherwise domestically sourced product that costs $300 is not considered to be an issue. If, on the other hand, the final product cost $5, then it's not acceptable to make a "Made in the USA" claim.

      Here is a link to the FTC page which describes the situation a bit more clearly, if not nearly so briefly.
      http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

      If I had points, I'd mod you up! Unfortunately, I don't.

    58. Re:No, it isn't misleading by DesertBlade · · Score: 1

      This is a stab at Apple, all there products Say "Designed by Apple in Califronia"

      Pretty sure apple has that phrase copyrighted so there will be some litagation if used.

      And for the record Google is downplaying the Made in the USA tag, probably to avoid these types of arguments.

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    59. Re:No, it isn't misleading by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

      Funny that you mention this.

      I just bought a Ford made in Cologne, Germany.

    60. Re:No, it isn't misleading by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      They're both doing the same thing, leading consumers to believe that more is happening in the USA than really is, or that some kind of good technical job is created by the manufacture of the device.
       
      The reality is, final assembly is menial work at minimal pay. There really isn't a shortage of menial work at minimal pay in the US right now, it's more a case of a shortage of people who will work at those terms.

      Even if 100% of the device was "made in the USA", there still wouldn't be any noticeable "good technical jobs" created. Mass production, by it's very nature, is menial (and rote) for minimal pay. My (now ex) brother in law worked in both a chip fab and an automobile assembly plant - and used to note that the only difference between them was how he dressed at work.

    61. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why hasn't someone punched "Made on Earth" on any product yet...

    62. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. When do you ever see an electronics product state "Made in China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, etc."? It's the final step that matters and there's always only one country mentioned.

      Obviously, you haven't been in Best Buy, lately. Most TVs and consumer products do say Made in one of those places.

    63. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Made in the USA" and "Assembled in the USA from foreign and domestic parts" have substantially different meanings, and Google is using the wrong one of these phrases in order to fool fools.

      Actually they are not. The FTC has very specific regulations as to what constitutes Made in the USA and the Nexus Q meets those regulations.

    64. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reality is, final assembly is menial work at minimal pay. There really isn't a shortage of menial work at minimal pay in the US right now, it's more a case of a shortage of people who will work at those terms.

      Wow, really? You don't seem to realize that on a small mobile device that final assembly is all of the assembly. I am electronics packaging engineer for high-grade military electronics, and I work in a group that specializing in rugged LCD displays. We source our components from all over the world, but all the assembly is done in the USA. Some of our operates know more about display production than our engineers. They certainly know more about electronic packaging than you, or most people on Slashdot. To consider this effort inadequate to earn the title of 'Made In America' or some how 'menial' is a complete disservice.

    65. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The threshold is really damn high.

      "Made in the USA" is regulated by the FTC. Their rules are below:

      Source: http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

      What is the standard for a product to be called Made in USA without qualification?

      For a product to be called Made in USA, or claimed to be of domestic origin without qualifications or limits on the claim, the product must be "all or virtually all" made in the U.S. The term "United States," as referred to in the Enforcement Policy Statement, includes the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. territories and possessions.

      What does "all or virtually all" mean?

      "All or virtually all" means that all significant parts and processing that go into the product must be of U.S. origin. That is, the product should contain no — or negligible — foreign content.

    66. Re:No, it isn't misleading by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      The marble didn't come to you in the shape of a statue either. They're not sourcing raw materials and building chips and components in the US. They're getting pre-built pieces and plugging some of them together. Hell do they even do any electronics or are they plugging in a complete board intoa US made case?

    67. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Intropy · · Score: 2

      That would depend on whether you were trying to sell the trophy for significantly more than the value of the legos used to make it. If the legos cost $100 and you sell the trophy for $500 then clearly the more valuable part of the trophy is the labor and artistic expression that went into making the trophy from the legos. In that case it would make sense to say it was made wherever you made it.

    68. Re:No, it isn't misleading by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Just cut to the chase. No true Scotsman.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    69. Re:No, it isn't misleading by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't someone punched "Made on Earth" on any product yet...

      Why so colloquial?

      The stamp should read:

      "Made By Hairless Apes Of Questionable Intelligence On A Primitive Planet Circling An Unremarkable Star In A Backwater Arm Of The Milky-Way Galaxy On The Fringes Of An Unremarkable Local Cluster Of Completely Average Galaxies - With Pride!"

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    70. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. There's something similar with John Deere. Their products are less American made than their nearest Japanese competitor.

    71. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Truedat · · Score: 1

      Some US production is way better than none

      Yes I agree with this. Only I didn't see the same sentiment here on slashdot in response to apple taking baby steps to improve the situation for Foxconn workers or for improving their own green credentials.

    72. Re:No, it isn't misleading by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      It might have been obvious, but it was also wrong. The majority of it is made in the USA. Even the power supply and the PCB.

    73. Re:No, it isn't misleading by gutnor · · Score: 1

      If it says "Made in X" I would expect a large part of the assembly and base components to come from X. Otherwise, what does that even mean ? To take a neutral example, if you invite me to taste your home made food, I do not expect you to kill a cow and harvest your fields. But I certainly would expect something more than a frozen pizza from walmart cooked in your home oven, even if you put it in a real plate.

    74. Re:No, it isn't misleading by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      My car is a spanish brand with german engine, assambled in Spain, bought in germany. And I bet it has a great deal of Czech parts in it too.

      --
      bickerdyke
    75. Re:No, it isn't misleading by J0nne · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, this is with the N900 only, though. Probably a parody of the Apple thing. In fact, I have no idea where the N9 was manufactured, it doesn't appear anywhere on the phone.

    76. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Troed · · Score: 2

      The fact that only the final assembly is being done in the US

      I suggest reading the iFixIt article. It seems only two components are definitely non-US in origin.

    77. Re:No, it isn't misleading by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The FTC has very specific regulations as to what constitutes Made in the USA and the Nexus Q meets those regulations.

      Oh good, the FTC said it was OK, so it must be on the level. Next, I will ask the USDA what I should eat and the FDA what I should take.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    78. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same anonymous poster here (wish I could log in at work)... for anyone wondering, yes I'm aware the link I posted was for .gc.ca. I'm from Canada, so that's what came to mind. But the USA has an almost identical system in place that works the valuation and tariff requirements the same way... perhaps with a different percentage point or two difference on some items. For the most part though, it's the same.

    79. Re:No, it isn't misleading by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      Oh good, the FTC said it was OK, so it must be on the level. Next, I will ask the USDA what I should eat and the FDA what I should take.

      That would probably improve your health. If only more people would follow your sensible example.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    80. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nexus Q is a sign that we're at inflection point:
      labor is now such a (relatively) minor part of electronic assembly, manufacturing *could* come back onshore.

      What can stop it?

      a. the IRS - we have to ensure that onshore manufacture isn't penalized.
      b. the EPA - we have to make sure that environmental regulations are sensible and timely.
      c. the DoE - US schools must give more emphasis to math/science. (Less Rosa Parks, more Richard Feynman.)
      d. supply chain agglomeration. As TFA points out, many components can't be sourced locally (yet).

      The show-stopper is that the first three of these issues are firmly in the hands of the DC political cluster-f*ck.
      Congress can be relied on to do diametrically the wrong thing on all three points.

    81. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do the raw materials have to be mined or grown here as well?

      That would be "Mined in the USA" not "Made in the USA". An understandable error.

    82. Re:No, it isn't misleading by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That would probably improve your health. If only more people would follow your sensible example.

      No, in fact, it would not, but that's because I can cook and I eat food. For the average douchewaffle who's "cooking" out of a cardboard box every night, you might have a point. However, the USDA has consistently lied to us about what we should eat via the food pyramid. They told us fat makes you fat (it doesn't) and that eating fat raises your cholesterol count (it doesn't) and to base our diet on a foundation of carbohydrates (fail) which benefits only the manufacturers of processed "food". And don't get me started on the fucking FDA.

      Seriously, if you don't know better than to do as your government tells you, you deserve what you get. The only problem is, the rest of us have to suffer with you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    83. Re:No, it isn't misleading by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes I do.

    84. Re:No, it isn't misleading by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the pedantry is incorrect. I built the computer in my living room, mostly from leftover junk and spare parts. I built it, in my living room. It was indeed made in the USA. None of the parts I built it with were, but the computer itself was.

      When I was a teenager and guitar fuzzboxes were rediculously expensive, I'd take $10 Japanes transistor radios and $2 worth of parts and solder and turn them into fuzzboxes. They were made in America, even if what they were made of wasn't.

    85. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Yes, he's wrong but there's usually quite a lot of menial work part of or related to manufacturing. Trailers, trucks, warehousing, raw materials, basic maintenance like oiling, lubing and changing wear parts or machining tools every so often. Of course all those wouldn't exist without the high-tech manufacturing plant and certainly some highly skilled people there as well, but the plant provides a mix. If you outsource that and say everybody is now doing complex design, you need a workforce where everybody can do complex design. That's usually a problem...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    86. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Rasperin · · Score: 2

      A large part of the work was done in the US, even if it was just the freaking hardware, software design, that's where most of the resources are. But it was designed, a large sum of the components manufactured (rtfa), and packaged here. Like someone else said, that's more than many of the so called "American" car companies. Because some of the components weren't made here, doesn't mean it wasn't made in the US. That's like bitching that someone put a made in china label on their device but some of the parts came from taiwan...

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    87. Re:No, it isn't misleading by sudden.zero · · Score: 1

      Amen Brother! From what I can understand they did try to use any and all US sources that they could, as the post I am replying to stated. It's not Google's fault if the US doesn't make something that they need. It's not like they will fund a Startup to build something that they couldn't buy here. Let's be realistic, the shear fact that they had anything done here is amazing!!!! Walk into Best Buy, Micro Center, Walmart or any other major retail store and try and find even one product that was completely made in the USA I dare you!

    88. Re:No, it isn't misleading by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The Federal Trade Commission has specific regulations on what qualifies for Made In USA

      These are published in the Federal Register

      http://www.ftc.gov/opp/madeusa2/62fr63755.pdf

      "an unqualified U.S. origin claim is
      a claim that the product is made entirely
      in the United States except for a de
      minimis or negligible amount of foreign
      content"

      Failing to adhere to this opens you up to deceptive advertising fines.

      So if Google is making this claim they need to be sourcing nearly everything in this device from the US.

    89. Re:No, it isn't misleading by mr1911 · · Score: 1

      basic maintenance like oiling, lubing and changing wear parts or machining tools every so often

      Once again, it would appear as though someone with no concept of high tech manufacturing is making assumptions about how things are made. Even most machine maintenance in a chip plant is done by folks with post-high school education, and you would be surprised at the numbers of educated engineers turning wrenches to keep some of the complex machines running well. Even emptying trash cans has some degree of skill to it as the person dumping the cans has to be trained regarding protocols that, if not followed, could have a significant negative impact on production yield.

      To the point you seem to be making though, if you follow the chain down far enough you find "unskilled" labor. Those jobs do not get outsourced, they get lost. Building up manufacturing capability and providing more jobs for unskilled labor is an overall benefit as well.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    90. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      That's how we ended up buying an American Toyota Sienna. Our rural neighbors teased me about "buying foreign" from the cabs of their Mexican Fords.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    91. Re:No, it isn't misleading by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They are mainly there to help decide how much tax and what import/export restrictions apply.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    92. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, the FTC didn't say it was okay. They did however say that it met the conditions to be labeled Made in the USA. It is the law enacted by congress that all goods sold must state where they were manufactured. So, it has to be labeled Made somewhere. All the FTC does is ensure that items meet the qualifications to be labeled Made in the USA. As for the USDA, if more people followed the food pyramid, even though it is flawed, they would probably be healthier. As for the FDA, it doesn't say what you should take, but it does say what you shouldn't take.

    93. Re:No, it isn't misleading by citizenr · · Score: 1

      The FTC requires that country-of-origin claims be assessed by portioning the manufacturing costs of the final product. A couple of dollars worth of foreign components/costs in an otherwise domestically sourced product that costs $300 is not considered to be an issue. If, on the other hand, the final product cost $5, then it's not acceptable to make a "Made in the USA" claim.

      Here is a link to the FTC page which describes the situation a bit more clearly, if not nearly so briefly.
      http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

      So the die cast case cost >$200? makes sense.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    94. Re:No, it isn't misleading by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Were you reading the same teardown article everyone else is? Not every internal part could be sourced to the US (Not that Google never claimed it was, the article even points this out) but the majority was, plus it was assembled in the US. That meets any requirements to use the term "Made in the USA" according to the FTC.

    95. Re:No, it isn't misleading by jbengt · · Score: 2

      The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act requires "substantial transformation" in the USA, so, by that definition, imported raw materials and parts can be used by a manufacturer in the US and you can call the final product "Made In The USA". (Just putting together kits, though, would not qualify). Other legal definitions require certain percentages of materials and parts originating in the USA in order to call something "Made In The USA". So YMMV.

    96. Re:No, it isn't misleading by meglon · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's very simple.... you follow the legal standard.

      http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    97. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. When do you ever see an electronics product state "Made in China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, etc."? It's the final step that matters and there's always only one country mentioned.

      Obviously, you haven't been in Best Buy, lately. Most TVs and consumer products do say Made in one of those places.

      Exactly his point. One of those places. Try re-reading what he wrote, and consider what role the quotation marks serve.

    98. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, "Made in" is a term of art and has thousands of nuances, not one of which is "The Googleplex PR Department thought it sounded nice."

      http://rulings.cbp.gov/

    99. Re:No, it isn't misleading by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The question is are those manufacturers actually manufacturing anything or relabeling it?

    100. Re:No, it isn't misleading by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Bonding and packaging is.

    101. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was "Designed by Apple in California" already taken? Or did they run into trademark issues with using "California" spelled correctly?

    102. Re:No, it isn't misleading by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The grains are much cheaper to produce. That is why the food pyramid ended up looking like that. It isn't cost effective (yet) to have everyone eating only meat and anything but meat. I would also take care with any sort of non-omnivorous diet be it vegetarian or carnivorous. Eating only meat and nothing but meat causes all sorts of issues on the long term like kidney failure or arthritis, just like vegans easily get rickets or anemia. We are omnivorous simple as that.

    103. Re:No, it isn't misleading by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The grains are much cheaper to produce. That is why the food pyramid ended up looking like that. It isn't cost effective (yet) to have everyone eating only meat and anything but meat.

      False dichotomy; there are foods other than meat. I would never suggest someone eat ONLY meat; at minimum you ought to get some fiber to keep your asshole working properly. And the grains are cheaper to produce only if you ignore externalities. Range-fed beef eating native grasses requires FAR less energy input that doesn't come from the sun than anything you can eat that you didn't forage for yourself, on foot. This ties into this whole argument I'm having about the green revolution right now. It requires less personal energy expenditure for the producers of food than organic, zero-tilth agriculture, but it produces less food per acre and it requires vastly more energy input that doesn't come from the sun, for free. When you eat "Green Revolution"-produced grains, you're responsible for the burning of fossil fuels, the spraying of pesticides and fertilizers, and in general a lot of energy-intensive activities which also have significant negative environmental impact. The energy cost of repairing that impact must also be taken into account. In the long term, it is far more expensive to eat a shitload of mass-produced grains than to eat properly. Only by ignoring externalities to the detriment of everyone everywhere on this planet do the grains become "cheaper" to produce.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    104. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anybody done a teardown on those "imported from Detroit" cars? You might be surprised just how much foreign material is found inside an "American" car.
      And yes, Canada counts as a foreign country in my book. Unless they finally give in and are assimilated.

    105. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Medinos · · Score: 1

      Heck, the Q is more 'Made in the USA' than many automobiles advertised as such.

      This is the total truth! I used to know this guy that would only buy American cars, his reasoning was mainly because he was racist.. He wasn't too happy when I pointed out the Mitsubishi symbol stamped all over the engine of the dodge he just bought his son. I quoted himself back to him saying "Didn't your dad fight in WW2? Does that mean nothing to you?"

    106. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider this - what would you label banana bread made from bananas from panama, wheat from Canada, eggs from Illinois and sugar from Brazil at a bakery in Cleveland? I'd argue for made in the USA for that myself.

    107. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the USA, and its trade partners in NAFTA and other agreements that give special treatment to "Made in USA" products, but where I am 80% local content is required to label a product as locally made. Of course there are industry standard accounting practices that mean that products with as low as 50% local content can qualify through careful use of subsidiary companies which produce 80% local parts which then count as 100% local when purchased and assembled into a larger product (look at all the subsidiaries the major Japanese and Korean electronics companies have for example).

    108. Re:No, it isn't misleading by 4phun · · Score: 1

      Funny that you mention this.

      I just bought a Ford made in Cologne, Germany.

      But Ford has software technology made in the USA by Microsoft, doesn't that count for something?

      Whoops my bad. No one would want to mention that about Ford.

      Microsoft is the reason Ford just fell in JD Power reliability rankings because the Microsoft Ford custom multi media center user experience was so unreliable.

      http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/20/ford-continues-to-slide-in-jd-power-survey-on-automaker-quality/

      I just bought a new 2012 family car a couple of weeks ago. I was intrigued by new 2012/2013 technology from Ford but I clearly did not want my wife to be alone and suffer the Ford equivalent of the infamous 'Blue Screen of Death'. I bought a Toyota Hybrid Camry XLS which was manufactured in Kentucky a few days after my order and delivered a week later.

      Marietta Toyota called the morning it was delivered and my wife drove it home that afternoon with less than five miles on the odometer.

      BTW she just had her first free OTA software update from Toyota which added new features.

      Who cares where it is built today? The proven high technology that you are getting today is a lot of where your satisfaction is in a global economy. NOTE: The 2012 THC has forty two computers managing all aspects of your ride.

    109. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure apple has that phrase copyrighted so there will be some litagation if used.

      Good grief, this stuff isn't hard Slashdotters. They don't have it copyrighted, they have it trademarked.

    110. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America != Entire world.

    111. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Hope you won't be too disappointed when it runs smoothly for years.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    112. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Pope · · Score: 1

      "No-Kia?" Sounds Korean IMO.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    113. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Yes it is misleading. There is an implied meaning in the "Made in the USA" label that they're trying to take advantage of.

      You do realize that "Made in the USA" has an actual legal meaning, and it isn't just what you "think" it should mean, right?

      Question, do you go after anyone who stamps the "Made in the USA" label on it if you don't feel it fits your definition, or is Google a special exception?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    114. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell they did all the assembly in the US, many of the key components were made in the US, and most of the design/etc work as well. It sounds like it has a few chips in it that say made in xyz. Good luck finding anything that doesn't have an asian component in it SOMEWHERE.

    115. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Who said the case is the only part made in the USA? I read that the power supply was made here, as were numerous components. Much of the assembly was done in the USA as well, and that is probably a big part of the cost.

      When you make a widget there are a bazillion costs that all go into it. As long as the overwhelming majority were spent in the USA I don't have an issue with the device having a Chinese screw or RAM chip in it...

    116. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you are a counter-example for many things other than that.

    117. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm just glad to see a country with decent environmental/labor regs get business, whether that is the US or Europe or Japan (or elsewhere). As much as I see Europeans and Americans squabbling around here, the fact is that these two regions have FAR more in common than what separates them, when compared to places where sludge is literally dumped in creeks and people could get beaten if they don't get enough work done.

    118. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      It probably also matters whether assembly is a big part of the production cost.

      Take a telescope mirror. Ingredients are sand, or maybe a block of glass. Then you sit and polish away at it for months to years constantly analyzing light reflected off of it until the whole thing is uniform to within maybe a few dozen nanometers.

      Even if only that step is done in the US it would qualify as being made here as that one step converts the mirror from a few thousand dollars worth of glass into something worth millions of dollars.

      Much of the legal world around tarrifs/etc is based on the addition of value - the difference between what you could sell the total of the inputs vs the outputs for.

    119. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely. In the UK, we have a Nissan factory with barely 20 workers. They have the gall to put 'Made in the UK' on all their Micras despite the fact that they basically ship over the car and then bolt some wheels on over here.

      Worst thing is I'm pretty sure those wheels were made in China too. And the tyres. And the bolts.

    120. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finland is a real country, stupid.

    121. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed! And it is a good start. Maybe little by little more components will migrate back to the land were the transistor was invented.

    122. Re:No, it isn't misleading by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      We couldn't sustain current world population using the old production methods and more land would be used for farming in order to sustain the same level of population. This means wooded areas would have to recede. Is that what you want? Even before the Green Revolution people were using Chile saltpeter to fertilize their fields and if they couldn't afford it they used dung which is much worse as it helps propagate diseases such as parasites into the fields. If you do not use pesticides you have more chance of failed crops. I have watched both kinds of doing agriculture and I have little doubts regarding which I prefer. If you could sustain large populations solely by breeding livestock humans would never have gone from being nomads (like the Mongol hordes) to agrarian societies based around grain harvesting. Industrial ammonia production uses nitrogen extracted from the air and hydrogen as feedstocks. The hydrogen currently usually comes from natural gas as that is the cheapest way to produce hydrogen currently but it could come from damn near everything including electrolysis of water. These luddite arguments are just idiocy sprouted by modern day Pol Pots.

    123. Re:No, it isn't misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm... yeah.
      To put it another way, manufacturing is relatively spread out to the point that it would probably be very difficult to make any one thing using parts from only one country - even including Japan. Plus, there's "making it", and "making it from reasonable parts efficiently at a decent price". If you told a Mexican computer maker that all their processors and memory had to be made in Mexico, they would close up shop.

      The "made in China" iPhone 4 has a lot of parts in it that are basically only made in Japan and Korea. I'm sure the Nexus is the same way. I assume that any reasonably complex product is the result of a large supply chain involving many manufacturers and parts from around the globe. "Made in XXX" usually means "Assembled in XXX", or perhaps a little more.

      Reasonably cheap quality memory (and flash memory) is basically manufactured by Samsung and Toshiba these days - so anyone who expected to see RAM and flash memory "made in USA" was probably kidding themselves to begin with. Take a look at the OWC aftermarket flash memory cards for Macbook Air - they are "made in USA" - but what about the parts?

  3. "Assembled in the USA" by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Would be more appropriate for most items that claim to be made here.

    Perhaps if you have a % of US sourced parts to go along with being assembled here, but until then its not really made here by any stretch of the imagination.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:"Assembled in the USA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'd like to see a few more tag lines rather than "Made in XXX", here would be my list along with what they may indicate

      "Designed in XXX,YYY,ZZZ" - white collar jobs
      "Supported in XXX,YYY,ZZZ" - phone support
      "Materials from XXX,YYY,ZZZ" - environmental impact, blue collar jobs
      "Manufactured in XXX,YYY,ZZZ" - environmental impact, blue collar jobs
      "Assembled in XXX" - blue collar jobs

      Where XXX,YYY,ZZZ are countries ordered by their % of work contribution. Some cutoff of only countries >30% might be good.

    2. Re:"Assembled in the USA" by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      So do 31% of the manufacture in the USA and 30%, 30% and 9% in China, India and Taiwan? "Manufactured in the USA."

    3. Re:"Assembled in the USA" by Stickybombs · · Score: 1

      Plus, is it 31% by weight? volume? part count? cost? We're going to need more labels!

    4. Re:"Assembled in the USA" by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      Maybe listed like ingredients in a food product?

    5. Re:"Assembled in the USA" by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Works for me. Then you can make an informed decision of what countries workers you want to support.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    6. Re:"Assembled in the USA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for not reading anything. You must manufacture a minimum of 40% of the items (by mass) you are assembling in the US. Go and do some research about this, you'll realize that this article is written like a Fox News story.

  4. Get A Clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If was assembled in the USA it's considered Made In America. More than 90% of the products you buy are put together from parts sourced from elsewhere.

    1. Re:Get A Clue by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      A somewhat valid point. At what point do we consider something "made"? Google is going with the final assembly. However, if we go a step back to all of the final parts, just before they're put together as one, then they're from all over. And I'm sure those individual parts have smaller parts that were either partially made elsewhere yet, or else the raw materials are from all over the place.

    2. Re:Get A Clue by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      We actually have some laws and rules about it. I suggest we start there.

    3. Re:Get A Clue by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Made in America means that it can be made in Chile or Canada too.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:Get A Clue by camperslo · · Score: 1

      It's still B.S. It's a tech product, and the circuit board isn't even stuffed with imported parts in the U.S. Having the case or frame here might as well be called a marketing expense instead of a manufacturing expense. It's done for marketing reasons, and isn't the meat of the product. They might as well throw a can of spaghetti sauce in a pot and call it homemade after adding a pinch of salt.

      It would be funny to see this used as precedence in an immigration case.
      "Yes, I'm made in U.S.A., it says so right here on my can of hair spray."

      Leave it to corporations to twist things using geography. Banks get away with using regulations bought in Delaware even for customers not in Delaware? Can we throw Delaware out of the U.S. meanwhile until they get their act together?
      Google seems happy to exploit everyone elses data. Since some corporations call them selves personal, so maybe I.P. issues should be treated as personal too?
      It seems like Google is handling everyone one elses data, grabbing taking it from many places and profiting from it. Maybe we should start calling what they do "data laundering".

      Why does the U.S. allow this level of deception? In the U.K. things are so different they didn't even let Apple describe the iPhone as accessing the whole internet because Flash wasn't supported. Because the 4G in the U.S. doesn't actually meet the full 4G specification, Apple got penalized in Australia when they said the iPad supported 4G. Which agency needs a reboot to bring some truth to claims made in the U.S.? The Commerce Department? We shouldn't put up with this.

  5. who ever would believe it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the USA does not have the technological capability to create the level of sophisticated electronics in these devices, who would ever think the contents were "made in the USA"? It is not possible.

  6. Duh? Of course it'll have overseas parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Designed by Google in California
    Assembled in the USA

    1. Re:Duh? Of course it'll have overseas parts by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Designed in California, Assembled in Wisconsin, Parts from Asia, Raw Materials from All Over The Fscking Place

  7. Like cars.. by QuantumRiff · · Score: 4, Informative

    Perhaps they have never disassembled an "american car" with all the parts stamped "made in Canda" or "made in mexico".

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    1. Re:Like cars.. by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered if this is why my last two "American made" cars had a weird mix of imperial and metric bolts. My current car is a Hyundai that was built in Alabama and it also has a mix of Imperial and metric bolts, although mostly metric.

    2. Re:Like cars.. by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2

      Thats surprising, the fittings should be all metric in vehicles these days. The Big 3 in the US were one of the last to switch to metric fasteners, but they made the transition years ago. I have run across oddball imperial sized screws in German cars (they held the headlight to a bracket), but never nuts or bolts.

    3. Re:Like cars.. by sootman · · Score: 1

      But not one of the major "domestic" auto manufacturers currently says their cars are made in the USA. Google, on the other hand, loudly trumpeted this during I/O.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  8. "Don't be evil" allows for "Be misleading" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, what do you expect from an overgrown ad agency that makes money by selling your privacy?

    1. Re:"Don't be evil" allows for "Be misleading" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't think we were talking about FaceBook security in this thread?

      Oh, we are talking about Google security. Humm....almost the same thing as talking about FaceBook security.

  9. Well, that's what we get... by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, what do you expect? The USA has outsourced just about all of its high-tech manufacturing overseas. There are a lot of parts that Google probably can't even get domestically. I think the point is that they're making more of the thing in the USA than most electronic gizmos. If they're successful and there's a lot of demand for the Nexus Q, and more importantly, if other companies follow suit and the demand for electronics supply to be close-at-hand increases, then you'll see a ripple effect for more things like chips being manufactured in the USA.

    1. Re:Well, that's what we get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The USA has outsourced just about all of its high-tech manufacturing overseas.

      Including its favourite operating system, Linux.

    2. Re:Well, that's what we get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about expecting an electronic device to be made in the USA. Google went out of their way to loudly proclaim that it was, indeed, made in the USA, so the onus is on them to support that claim.

      Had Google said nothing about the origins of the device, nobody would care where it came from. Then again, Google wouldn't have a convenient scapegoat for massively overpricing their device.

    3. Re:Well, that's what we get... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Well, what do you expect? The USA has outsourced just about all of its high-tech manufacturing overseas.

      Yet, despite that, the US's manufacturing sector would be something like the fifth or sixth largest economy in the world if taken on it's own.

    4. Re:Well, that's what we get... by KingSkippus · · Score: 2

      Really? Google's going "out of their way"? I checked the Nexus Q web site, and funny enough, I don't see any stars and stripes plastered on it. There's a notation on the Q itself, but it's inset on the back of the unit without any kind of painted letters or anything; even less obvious than the "Made in China" stickers I see plastered on most other things I buy.

      As far as I can tell, the "Made in the USA" thing originated from a tech reporter asking someone who worked on the project why it's more expensive than similar devices. From there, a lot of people made a big deal out of it. While I'm sure that Google doesn't mind the publicity, I think that saying that they're going "out of their way to loudly proclaim that" is a bit of an overstatement.

    5. Re:Well, that's what we get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they made a point to say "Made in USA" at Google I/O where they were introducing the product. This wasn't at the prompting of a reporter, they were proud of that tidbit and wanted you to know it.

    6. Re:Well, that's what we get... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Well, despite that, the US's financial services sector is probably the largest economy in the world if taken on its own, even if compared to the entire rest of the US economy, or the total economy of any other country. I'm not 100% certain on that - maybe it is a close #2 or something like that.

      It is amazing how much we spend on bankers in the US...

    7. Re:Well, that's what we get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Why the Hell would an international website have stars and stripes on it. They are supporting American business by putting their money where their mouth is and all you have to says is 'Why didn't you stick a flag on it?'. Well maybe because there's 250-odd countries in the world that will visit that site and at least half of them are sick of having "God Bless America" shoved down their throats. Hell I get that you love your country and shit, but seriously would you have bought your computer if there was a Chinese/Japanese flag on the website?

      Maybe it says that because it ACTUALLY WAS made in America. Someone else up there said if it was 9% other, 30% Chinese, 30% Taiwanese and 31% American why does it qualify? It astounds me how absurd it seems to be to the American people that if its made more in America than anywhere else then it qualifies to have 'Made in USA' on the back more than anywhere else.

      Excuse me for my rudeness. Its just that Amerca is no longer a country to its citizens, its a Brand. And this whole page is dedicated to Brand snobbery.

  10. WSJ Link by mat.power · · Score: 3, Informative

    Love it when /. editors add links to paywalled articles...

    1. Re:WSJ Link by RogueLeaderX · · Score: 3, Informative

      But you can get eight weeks free! All WSJ asks for is some personal information ...

      Fortunately the good professors school posts the article for free: http://www.umflint.edu/som/images/Perry_WSJ_022511.pdf

    2. Re:WSJ Link by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Fortunately the good professors school posts the article for free: http://www.umflint.edu/som/images/Perry_WSJ_022511.pdf

      thanks for the link! saved me lotsa time from sending WSJ my personal info.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  11. Re:Timothy's anus stretches "Goatse" label by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Serious question. On some stories (there are certain patterns but I won't bore you), I notice a lot of the kinds of comments I am replying to right now. These comments have blatant racist/vulgar/nsfw word-spewings and are almost always from AC's. Is this some kind of coordinated effort to keep people at work or anywhere else there may be filters for this kind of stuff from reading this content? I notice it a lot on anything that praises open source or even tangentially like this Android running device. Just curious about people's thoughts.

  12. I see a business opportunity by nedlohs · · Score: 2

    Making stickers in the USA, that have "Made in the USA" printed on them....

    1. Re:I see a business opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I bet we could outsource that to China to save a few cents.

    2. Re:I see a business opportunity by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      You could do it cheaper if you used Chinese glue, paper and ink!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:I see a business opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And printing. That'd be cheaper in China too.

    4. Re:I see a business opportunity by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Good idea, just stick 'em on in the US. That counts as assembly right? Maybe hire a Chinese H1B to do it.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  13. You're paying for jobs, and you're getting them... by Squeebee · · Score: 3, Informative

    Many of the parts listed in the article had multiple possible source countries, and several of them listed US plants as potential sources. Conceivably Google could have requested those plants be used as much as possible.

    Even if that's not the case, we're talking chips here. The housing was made in the USA, several of the chips were as well. It's reasonable to assume that the boards were made in a US plant, that the work of mounting chips to boards, of attaching connectors, of assembling the units, of doing QA, etc. etc. was done in a factory in the USA.

    Most of the human labor (in other words the actual jobs) was performed in the USA. The foreign-sourced components are small enough that there was likely a lot more robot labor than human labor involved.

    I'd say what you're really paying for in buying that Made in the USA label is employment for Americans, and you're getting it.

  14. If you have a problem, file a complaint. by coldfarnorth · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even if it is a bit fuzzy, the FTC regulates the use of express claims like "Made in the USA" See this webpage for details:
    http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

    In short, not every part of the device needs to be from the US for the device to be "Made in the USA". Here is a relevent exerpt for people who are interested, but not THAT interested:
    -------------------
    What factors does the Commission consider to determine whether a product is "all or virtually all" made in the U.S.?

    The product’s final assembly or processing must take place in the U.S. The Commission then considers other factors, including how much of the product’s total manufacturing costs can be assigned to U.S. parts and processing, and how far removed any foreign content is from the finished product. In some instances, only a small portion of the total manufacturing costs are attributable to foreign processing, but that processing represents a significant amount of the product’s overall processing. The same could be true for some foreign parts. In these cases, the foreign content (processing or parts) is more than negligible, and, as a result, unqualified claims are inappropriate.

    Example: A company produces propane barbecue grills at a plant in Nevada. The product’s major components include the gas valve, burner and aluminum housing, each of which is made in the U.S. The grill’s knobs and tubing are imported from Mexico. An unqualified Made in USA claim is not likely to be deceptive because the knobs and tubing make up a negligible portion of the product’s total manufacturing costs and are insignificant parts of the final product.

    Example: A table lamp is assembled in the U.S. from American-made brass, an American-made Tiffany-style lampshade, and an imported base. The base accounts for a small percent of the total cost of making the lamp. An unqualified Made in USA claim is deceptive for two reasons: The base is not far enough removed in the manufacturing process from the finished product to be of little consequence and it is a significant part of the final product.

    --
    Lets start refering to The War Against Terror by it's initials. . .
  15. Never say "much ballyhooed" again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear sl4shd0rk,

    Never ever say the phrase "much ballyhooed" again.
    You have no idea how retarded it sounds. You probably don't realize it, but every time you say it, at least 12-15 people around you wish they could watch you die a slow, painful death.

    Sincerely,
    Concerned Humans Everywhere

  16. Besides, why is this wrong? by F69631 · · Score: 1

    I can understand why people dislike misleading marketing but why is it a positive thing if something is made in the USA? Humans are humans everywhere and companies are not more evil if they employ 100 people in Korea than if they employ 100 people in the USA (especially when they can probably employ 200 people in Korea instead of 100 people in the USA) I guess you could make a point about it being wrong because of the financial support (tax credits, etc.) that companies receive for staying in the states but most of the time the bureaucrats/politicians who award them do know how many people the companies employ so I doubt there is that much cheating going on...

    If companies dodge tax (make their profit in one country, taking advantage of all the infrastructure, etc. provided by that country but then pay 0% taxes to some remote island), that's unethical and obviously just gaming the system. But if companies just employ people who don't ask so high material rewards that the planet can't support it in the long term, I have hard time seeing what's wrong.

    1. Re:Besides, why is this wrong? by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I can understand why people dislike misleading marketing but why is it a positive thing if something is made in the USA

      If you don't understand this, then you are either part of the problem and need to leave, or live somewhere else already.

      Support your own country, and its people.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:Besides, why is this wrong? by kubernet3s · · Score: 2

      1. People working in foreign countries often make far less and in worse conditions. I'm not saying it's always the stereotypical Nike sweatshop, but a lot of places treat their workers unfairly due to poor regulation. A device made in the US must be made by workers with certain allowances (forty hour work weeks, minimum wage, usually paid sick leave and other benefits for something like electronics manufacture) that are not guaranteed elsewhere. If you have to employ someone, better to employ a person whose employer will care for them sustainably. 2. The more countries involved, and the further they are apart, the larger the carbon footprint of each device. 3. Maintaining a favorable balance of imports over exports is a basic requirement for a healthy economy. Given the amount of goods we import, and the amount of goods electronics-manufacturing countries export, they will not be harmed by losing a small bit of our business, while each chain of imports weakens us materially. It's like cooking at home versus eating take out: yes, the tip you give the delivery man will allow HIM to go home and feed HIMSELF, but honestly you should save the money so you can make rent

    3. Re:Besides, why is this wrong? by kubernet3s · · Score: 1

      where the f*** did all my tags go?

  17. Actually... by Junta · · Score: 3, Informative

    The teardown lists the chips and *potential* points of origin, a few which could not have been produced domestically. The proportion of chips that actually might have been sourced from US is actually pretty significant (more than I thought would have been possible). Of the components that might have been sourced from overseas or domestically, they have no idea how those parts were fulfilled (though at least for DIMMs, the SPD reveals the manufacturing plant if you understand the manufacturer specific location codes).

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  18. He's Holding a Thermal Detonator! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Maybe they OEM'd parts from Bosch.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  19. And that is what is required by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Those labels are required by law, and what they require is that the country of final assembly is where things are labeled. Now you can argue if that is stupid or not, but that is how it is done, and has been for a long time (back when it was implemented it made more sense).

    Almost all tech devices are a hodge podge of components from different places. Even a single component can have many places. Like say you get a 22nm Ivy Bridge Intel processor. Well it was fabricated in the USA, in Chandler Arizona. That's where Intel's 22nm fab is (though I understand they are bringing up 22nm at their fab in Israel soon here). However once it is fabbed, it is shipped off to another site for testing and packing. There is one in the US, but also one in Costa Rica, Singapore, and other places. So your processor may well be stamped "Costa Rica" even though the fabrication was done in the US.

    Of course that then goes on a motherboard almost certainly made in China, they are pretty much the only place that makes them. However on that motherboard is components from all over. The capacitors are often from Japan, they are really big in that market. The southbridge chipset is probably from the US, other incidental chips often from Taiwan. The memory that goes on there then depends on the brand. A lot of it is made in Taiwan, some in Germany, some in the US, just depends on who you get it from it is a lot more world wide. The harddrive is probably from Malaysia, that is where most are made, though there are other places and of course the harddrive itself has a bunch of components from different places.

    This just continues. We live in a global economy and most things are built of components from all over. In some cases, you discover that only one country really does a given thing. They've gotten good at it, so nobody else really competes.

    The "made in" labels always specify the place of final assembly. If you want that changed, well you can work on that, but it is pretty entrenched and I doubt it is going anywhere. No way we are going to list every place. Otherwise you are going to have a device that says "Made of components from the US, Canada, Mexico, China, Taiwan, Japan, Malaysia, Germany, France, and oh fuck it about 20 other nations."

    1. Re:And that is what is required by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      They can always print the percentage of foreign manufacturing on their package.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    2. Re:And that is what is required by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      With semiconductors expensive enough to actually have labels, you sometimes see 'diffused in' and 'packaged in' indicated individually.

    3. Re:And that is what is required by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Better solution:

      "Made on Sol 3" ("Made on Earth", if you want to be less pedantic).

    4. Re:And that is what is required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No

      What they require is that the label reflect the country where the final assembly WORK was done. I can, literally, manufacture a car in Korea, complete everything but connecting the battery cables, and as long as that final step is left until the wheels touch the USA, I can say it was assembled here.

      USA! USA!

    5. Re:And that is what is required by Altus · · Score: 2

      I know mostly we don't like attributed facts on this site but maybe a link to the FTC would be in order since they, you know, actually enforce this stuff.

      http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

      It looks to me like this might not qualify for an unqualified made in the USA label especially if a considerable amount of the electronics assembly is done in another country.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    6. Re:And that is what is required by PuckSR · · Score: 1

      Ok, and then should they also be required to track that? That can change day-to-day on most electronic components. They order transistors to spec, not from a specific country. So, they want a component that meets spec, they don't care who made it.

      Also, should they keep track of where the original sub-components came from? The raw material? The ore for that raw material? No one keeps track of that? Fungibility is a bitch

    7. Re:And that is what is required by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Of course that then goes on a motherboard almost certainly made in China, they are pretty much the only place that makes them.

      The main board on the Nexus Q clearly says "Made in the USA" on it. The power supply says the same thing (which surprised me even more). Designing, manufacturing, and stuffing the PCBs in the US, casting the case and base, and final assembly are the bulk of the manufacturing Google has any control over. I'd say that's a pretty damn honest effort to source US parts and labor.

    8. Re:And that is what is required by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      The automobile industry reports their percentages now. So I don't know what your point is other than being reactionary.

      Origins of raw materials are not taken into consideration just the finished parts. Parts would include the CPU, Speakers, anything in a plastic package (ICs, RAM, etc.), chassis, light pipes, and surface mounted semiconductors.

      This isn't that big a deal to track and as far as I can tell the chassis and circuit boards are manufactured and assembled in the US with foreign components. Believe it or not, most companies have this statistic already for duties and tax purposes.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    9. Re:And that is what is required by Teun · · Score: 1

      Percentage by value, weight, area or volume?

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    10. Re:And that is what is required by Teun · · Score: 1
      I hazard the guess a substantial part of the electronics came via these guys:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASML_Holding

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    11. Re:And that is what is required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i had a job once where my main duty was to remove the "Made in mexico" sticker that came in on all the product we were repackaging.

    12. Re:And that is what is required by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      ASML manufactures machine tools not actual electronic produce. Most electronics used in cell phones are manufactured in South Korea or Taiwan with some components coming from Japan, China or elsewhere.

    13. Re:And that is what is required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What characteristic do you use though - cost? weight? volume? parts count? Think of the average PC - by weight, the chassis and power supply is over half, by volume, closer to 70%, by cost probably about 10-20%, parts count could be either 2 or 2000 depending on how you calculate. Just another way to go wrong with confidence

    14. Re:And that is what is required by twistofsin · · Score: 1

      They can always print the percentage of foreign manufacturing on their package.

      Percentage of what?

      Weight?

      Volume?

      Cost?

      Which parts float in water?

      Why the fuck do you want it to be so complicated? The majority of the labor in any electronic device is in assembling it. If they put it together here in the US, they spent a significant amount in wages in an area that desperately needs it.

      I've known friends in both manufacturing and assembly, and let me tell you the assembly jobs are better paying, require more skills, and are more satisfying to do. Manufacturing is often as simple as pushing a button to cycle a machine and then visually inspecting the output. For 12 hours. As mind numbing as putting the same thing together over and over together sounds, it's a hell of a lot more stimulating than pushing a button.

    15. Re:And that is what is required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The automobile industry reports their percentages now.

      That's a fucking handwave if I've ever heard one. I'm willing to bet any amount of money that (say) GM doesn't add up the percentages of the individual components used to make the ECU for a given car, but rather simply counts the ECU as a single unit manufactured by Delphi Automotive wherever their factory is.

      This isn't that big a deal to track and as far as I can tell the chassis and circuit boards are manufactured and assembled in the US with foreign components. Believe it or not, most companies have this statistic already for duties and tax purposes.

      It's not that easy. If you're ordering SMD resistors by the container-load, you buy whichever manufacturer meets the spec at the lowest price. A given product on the assembly line could be getting 1k resistors off a reel from India, and 100 units later, they're getting 1k resistors made in China because the reel changed. Are you seriously suggesting each and every product have a variable percentage breakdown based on individual components like that? They may track the container load they bought for taxes and tariffs, but they aren't tracking the individual components.

    16. Re:And that is what is required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep even when I buy an Intel processor which of their many fabs did it actually originate from?

      I didn't even bother to check my3930k this time.

  20. Re:Timothy's anus stretches "Goatse" label by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Place holders for threadjacking when it gets crowded..

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  21. Re:Timothy's anus stretches "Goatse" label by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Serious question. On some stories (there are certain patterns but I won't bore you), I notice a lot of the kinds of comments I am replying to right now. These comments have blatant racist/vulgar/nsfw word-spewings and are almost always from AC's. Is this some kind of coordinated effort to keep people at work or anywhere else there may be filters for this kind of stuff from reading this content? I notice it a lot on anything that praises open source or even tangentially like this Android running device. Just curious about people's thoughts.

    The problem is that Slashdot's "4Chan and Mutant Repellant" shield works as well as the rest of Slashcode. That is, it's pretty buggy. Sometimes it gets the job done, other times not so much.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  22. Where is the circuit board built/populated? by guidryp · · Score: 1

    That is really the key element to me, and the most significant assembly work. The actual components actually need to come from the suppliers where-ever they may be.

    If they are actually doing the circuit board building population in the USA, I think that warrants a made in USA kudos.

    If they are putting the assembled circuit board in a case, that is just lame BS.

    1. Re:Where is the circuit board built/populated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote:

      This is consistent with what Google told Wired: The device’s silicon was sourced from overseas suppliers, but most of its circuit boards and chassis pieces are made in America.

        http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/07/made-in-usa-nexus-q-teardown-reveals-many-overseas-parts/

  23. I got your "struggling" manufacturing sector... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. Don't be surprised by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Some day this kind of labeling will be made illegal.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  25. Surprise Surprise by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    Imagine that, a company that makes a habit of being overly vague about how it gleans your personal data and what exactly it does with it also being vague as to the origins of another one of their products. Yeah I can use another search engine, but unfortunately they are a defacto standard. Everyone on Slasdot likes to beat up Microsoft for their corporate policies, but Google can't seem to do any wrong. OK, now it's time for the Gmail zombies to kick in and tell everyone how it's good to put more of your personal data on their servers since Google does no harm... never mind a company's private data. Google is just as slimy as any multi billion dollar company. Even if it does provide an essential service; like AT&T or Con Ed. So now why exactly should I want to give Google my cell phone number when I want to post a video of whatever on YouTube?

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    1. Re:Surprise Surprise by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      You don't honestly think that the other search engine you use isn't doing EXACTLY what google does do you? That information is worth a lot of money and if you aren't paying for the service I guarantee they are selling it.

    2. Re:Surprise Surprise by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Aren't we talking about Google? Wasn't this story about Google?

      I don't give a shit what the others do. But sure, they're weasels with our personal data too; but we aren't talking about them are we? They're not the ones who proudly waved the old red white and blue, and trumpeted about selling a made in America phone. When in reality it was, yay! we're bringing plastic and zinc moulding back to North America! Who needs high tech electronics anyway?

      Or are you saying because others' are weasels too, Google and the rest can be forgiven when (not if) they lie to us? Where did you get your ethics book? Wall Street? Or do you really buy the 'do no evil' bullshit.

      They are a billion dollar company, and like any other billion dollar company they did it any way it took. So surprise surprise when we once again find out they're bullshitting us. I don't know why anyone post stuff like this as news. It should be assumed. It should be news when they and the rest do something ethical.

      I don't begrudge them using data since that is what they are in business for. But they have reached a level where they are becoming like any other corporate sociopathic entity, with a pseudo monopolistic position in the market. They basically take what they want and push people around to get it. I even gave an example: Why do I need to give my cell phone number to create a Google account now? They don't need it to provide the services. They know that people want to post their cute cat videos and make them give out unnecessarily personal data to do so. Even if there is a way around it, they don't make it obvious. That is a sure sign of a bunch of scum bags in my book. I have had an account for ages, so don't have this issue with them, but I don't like to see it being done.

      So again, surprise surprise, who would figure they would lie about a product in order to make more money. What do you call cynical when the stuff you are cynical about really happens? It's kind of like you aren't paranoid if people really are out to get you.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  26. Will not buy Made in the USA EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will wait until it is 100% made overseas until I purchase one.

    Thanks.

  27. Taken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's already a patent on that...

  28. Product of Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In Canada there are rules that say you can label a product as "Product of Canada" provided that 50 percent of the cost of the product was spent in Canada. Thus fish caught and cleaned in another country and shipped to Canada, where they are packaged for store shelves, are labelled "Product of Canada" because the final packaging makes 50 percent of the total cost.

    Made in Canada has different rules I believe.

    What are the rules of the Made in USA label?

    1. Re:Product of Canada by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Just give more cash to more republicans and you can label nuke waste from China as being a Kid's toy made in the USA.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  29. Support Your Hood by RobertLTux · · Score: 2

    If you are living in the US then buying stuff MADE IN THE USA is buying stuff made by "your fellow citizens".
    In fact i would bet that many folks here would pay a bit extra for something if they knew that it was "Made By Fred Rogers #586-23-6431D" and they could in fact Meet Mr Rogers"

    so if you are living in %other country% you might prefer an item made in %other country% unless you knew that %other country% was absolute rubbish in making %item%

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  30. Buried Lede by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Yes, I praise Google for doing at least some sourcing and assembling in the USA, but remember: they did this just for a very niche product that they know they won't sell many of for two reasons. First, it is at least 1.5 times the cost of similar multimedia devices. Secondly, it cannot stream ANY local media; an as-designed flaw mainly to help bump up Google Music usage.

    This is another Google experiment they will kill sometime next year after the hype of embarrasing Apple for building just about everything in China dies down. Also: don't hold your breath for any Nexus phones or tablets to be built in the USA - not sure they actually could be anyways.

  31. The sticker by Frankie70 · · Score: 2

    I heard that the 'Made in the USA' sticker was made in Mexico.

  32. Tax cheats want to appear patriotic by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    If they want appreciation they can start by paying their fair share of tax. Slapping some Chinese hardware into a US case does not make me think anything different of them.

  33. Re:Google lying like other big companies? by andydread · · Score: 1

    LOL how idiotic. What public relations firm are you representing? Do you write code? Is google actively seeking to destroy your ability to write sucessful system code with the use of software-patents like Apple and Microsoft are doing? Even though the code you write is totally different from any code they have or have used in any products they produce? Is Google launching "Thermonuclear" lawsuits against their competitors? Is google running a software-patent extortion scheme in order to hobble open-source and free software ala Microsoft? Please elaborate on how google is exploiting information about me to the fullest extent?

  34. "Google made an effort to proudly point out..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, the suit making the statement went to great lengths to play-down the "Made in the USA" point, going so far as to say that it would not be a significant part of their marketing strategy. Don't let things like facts get in the way of a good hate, though...

  35. Even US automakers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...do this. Parts are made outside the US with final assembly inside the US. Now they can claim "made in the USA." I'm looking at you, Harley.

  36. Re:Timothy's anus stretches "Goatse" label by datavirtue · · Score: 2

    If I can't thread-jack, I don't comment. Period.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  37. Slashdot story stretches "News" Label by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OMFG! Some of the ICs are only made in foreign countries! Some might be made in foreign countries, but are also made in the US! They only make most of the parts and assemble it in the US!

    I read the tear down at Fix-it link, but it doesn't match the headline here. Neither does the CNN article linked claim that the entire device is made in the US.

    "A tear-down at ifixit.com however, reveals the guts of the thing are mostly manufactured overseas at the expected locations (China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, et al)." Except, it doesn't. Nothing in the tear-down supports that claim.

    This is just trolling for those that don't RTFAs, by a submitter who does not understand manufacturing and apparently didn't RTFAs either

  38. Made in the US of foreign and domestic content by Phelan · · Score: 1

    That would be the technically accurate claim and for a number of hardware products that my employer manufactures.

    In our example we assemble in the US, design in the US, program the firmware in the US, program the chips in the US but source a number of the raw parts from TAA compliant countries. I'm pretty sure the Nexus Q can claim pretty much the same manufacturing mix minus the TAA compliance, not that that matters for a consumer device.

    That said I'm going to buy one... I don't care if it ends up being a paper weight, I'll support on-shoring wherever I get a chance.

    --
    "Nimis exaltatus rex sedet in vertice - caveat ruinam!"
  39. At least they are built there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least it's manufactured in the country they claim. We sell products which are entirely manufactured (and tested) in India, we bring them over here, test them again and slap a 'Made in the U.K" sticker on them then we claim to the UK Chamber of Commerce (and Saudi customs) that they are of UK origin.

    THAT is how you do dishonest country of origin claims.

    AC as i'd rather not go to jail for helping to lie to the Chamber & HMRC

  40. As 30rock would say: by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    "It's not hand-made in USA, it's Hand-made in Usa. The Hand people are a vietnamese slave-tribe, and Usa is their island prison."

    (very bad screencap: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zm3TepXcD8A)

    (Jack Donnaghy)

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:As 30rock would say: by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      Oh, and Google is owned by Halliburton !

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  41. Sometimes it's realistically impossible by Quila · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I read a story on the people who make Mag flashlights. They are very proud of "made in the USA" and wanted a 100% USA-manufactured product. Even for something as simple as a flashlight, turned out that one part could not be sourced from the USA, and gearing op manufacturing themselves would have been prohibitively expensive.

    I'm not saying Google's in this exact boat, but it is hard to expect 100% made in the USA from any product of reasonable complexity if something as simple as a flashlight can't do it.

  42. Title 19: Customs Duties by busman · · Score: 1

    134.43 Methods of marking specific articles.

    (1) Assembled in (country of final assembly);

    (2) Assembled in (country of final assembly) from components of (name of country or countries of origin of all components); or

    (3) Made in, or product of, (country of final assembly).

    --
    __
    Sigs are like arse-holes, everybody has one ;-)
  43. Oh! The recursiveness! by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

    The ironic thing would be to produce the stickers in China and then export them in USA to be glued on American products.

    The sticker would then read "Made in USA" with a smaller "Made in China" under it. That will surely cause another Slashdot article.

  44. Re:Timothy's anus stretches "Goatse" label by mystikkman · · Score: 1

    > notice it a lot on anything that praises open source or even tangentially like this Android running device

    What? That's just your confirmation bias. For example, this story is actually super critical of the Nexus Q.

    So according to your own logic, maybe it's the pro-open source crowd doing this to bury articles like this? :)

  45. Re:Timothy's anus stretches "Goatse" label by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has been like that for years. It's why moderation was first created. Some people just get their lulz by posting garbage and waiting for it to be modded down. Who knows why.

  46. Really? by gooner666 · · Score: 1

    Kinda like the old box printed in USA for all the Walmart dumb dumbs

    --
    Lets get this over with... Fuck Off
  47. EGGs in the USA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a factory in Wisconsin which makes containers for EGGs and are labeled made in the USA etc. The eggs which are placed into our containers are from CHINA chicken factories and shipped all that way to the middle of the USA so we can repackage them and mislead people to think they were laid in horrible US corporate egg "farms" instead of the even worse unregulated chinese "farms".

    I'm told more than half the eggs in the USA are not from the USA and our eggs are probably not considered among them by anybody counting end products.

    I wonder just how chinese eggs are so cheap that it makes sense to fly them here.

  48. Re:Timothy's anus stretches "Goatse" label by meowris · · Score: 1

    Summer.

  49. Some facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

    It should state like many other products:
    Assembled in the US from foreign and domestics parts

  50. Good. I want this product to bomb anyway by Sark666 · · Score: 1

    I'm actually an android fan, but I don't get this device. What I have against it is I read that previously the nexus 7 was to have hdmi out, but why have that when you can buy a nexus q?! And why have an sdcard slot when you can get it all from the cloud?

    Seriously, besides additional outputs and having friends over being able to queue up their media (but not any media on their actual device) why is this worth $300?!

    I would have been completely happy with hdmi on the nexus 7 instead. If these two moves take off I think sdcard slots and onboard hdmi will start to become a thing of the past.

  51. The standard by meglon · · Score: 1

    So, a bunch of posts saying this is wrong because it's misleading, others posting in support of businesses lying (aka: committing fraud). I'm guessing that the majority of people don't understand that there is actually a definition for "Made in the USA." If they're not living up to the standard, it is indeed fraud.

    http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  52. Re:Timothy's anus stretches "Goatse" label by dontclapthrowmoney · · Score: 1

    You're saying these submissions are limited to specific cultures too? It isn't summer here.

  53. A bit stretched, but useful by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    This allows Google to get a line going and then slowly switch over more and more western-made parts.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  54. Actually a very good reason for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think about it if it is made in America, it can't be blocked from importation while any patent disputes are worked out. +1

  55. As US-made as possible under the circumstances by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    First, it's difficult to make anything that's 100% US-made; if nothing else, raw materials such as metals are likely to come from elsewhere. Making anything electronic is pretty much impossible; there are no remaining US suppliers for many components, and even if there were the rare earths used in semiconductor manufacturing would have to be imported. Google could go farther in the direction of US manufacturing. Notably, they could have the circuit boards made and populated here. But that complicates manufacturing because it means that the supply chain is stretched, as most of the important component sources are in the Far East, so choosing not to do that is understandable.

  56. Re:Timothy's anus stretches "Goatse" label by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he is actually blaming Summer Glau.

  57. Made in Everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So THIS is the key moment when people realize that "made in ___" is pure rubbish? Pull another one!

  58. Re:Timothy's anus stretches "Goatse" label by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    What is critical about pointing out that a manufacturer is lying through their teeth? That is default behaviour for a manufacturer. Any manufacturer.

    That a particular manufacturer claims "we don't do Nasty Thing X," is only to be expected. Lying is expected behaviour for any manufacturer, or any other type of corporation. Didn't you read your marketing handouts?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"