Then why wouldn't you just call it egalitarianism and be done with it. The fact the word itself is gynocentric should tell you something about the intent of its proponents.
You missed his point entirely. It's not 'assault' to call someone a name. The fact you (and others) think that is an example of the problem. Grow some calluses already. Life isn't romper room or a barney episode. Kids need to be taught this again. It might not be acceptable nowadays, but, in the so-called 'adult' world, the passive aggression that results when true feelings can't be aired bluntly causes far more damage. Enforced manners just give bullies a PC wall to hide behind. This is why linus torvalds told sarah sharp where she could shove her victimhood routine. The only way to beat this crap is to nip it in the bud.
School policies today typically apply over-protective barriers around bullied students that deny them opportunities to right the peer-respect imbalance caused by their bullies ("don't hit back or you'll get in trouble too, tell a teacher"). Nothing destroys self esteem and social-standing faster than tattling. This forces them to fester at the bottom social rungs where they can't do squat about the bullies without being expelled themselves. This pressure cooker environment causes untold misery... These zero tolerance policies, the ones that rapidly escalate to expulsion for schoolyard scuffles, are relatively new, and I think they contribute to school shootings and other maladies in society when the students become adults.
These kids need to be taught to stand up for themselves, and, within reason, hash out their schoolyard problems on their own. A few fist fights is a far better outcome than this has been. You might think this is cruel or encourages bad behavior, but the current system is crueler because it forces these kids to suppress their feelings until they crack, and by then it's too late.
nor does it say anything about the arguments made by this small minority. Their arguments stand or fall on their own, regardless of how or where they were published.
We need to stop labeling criticism we don't like as 'hate'. It's basically ad hominem.
No. It proves that jezebel's authors' overly sensitive, fallacy-ridden, crocodile-tear victimhood windbaggery makes them perfect trollbait. Just like the creationists and westboro baptists, it's a case of flies to shit.
...and you are purposely misrespresenting what I said in those posts. I believe that's a strawman fallacy. I've never said nor implied that women shouldn't be scientists. I did say they should have to run the same gauntlets men have to in order to receive the same reward/respect/degree/salary/raise/promotion/funding etc.
how will you extract energy from the plastic waste? burning it will only dump the contents into the atmosphere as particulates which will either be inhaled or rained back into the oceans again.
If they were smart about it, they'd just run the build scripts twice, once with each toolchain.. Surely the process can be automated like the multiplatform OSS projects do, making the overhead cost virtually nil.
universal extractor works wonders for a lot of these, though the last version does have some outdated versions of the extractors. Many of them can be updated manually.
This is what happens when some entity like google tries to idiot proof. We just end up with better idiots. In this case, that infiniti is a far cry from google's claims for its own AV, and already we have morons who think the machine is infallible.
Ever consider that it might be both parties who are guilty of such behavior? The left grows the government at the expense of liberties, and the neocons grow certain businesses at the expense of the free market. Of course, there's plenty of crossover, too.
People can and do use gentoo stable in production environments. It does require a non braindead admin to set it up, but the results are limber and powerful, esp for updating and maintaining large numbers of hosts. The fact you don't even use linux suggests the gp is right. You are the newb here.
By all means, use what you want, but 95% of the software is the same regardless of distro.
The programming behind it does, and it either meets your needs or not. The name is irrelevant. Good technical people learn not to use their emotions as first pass filters.
..and people who pick software based on their emotional responses to their internal code names aren't worth worrying about anyway. There is nothing more expensive than an irrational customer.
No, I never said that men did everything, nor did I imply it.
I have no issue with coexisting. I do have issue with groups using government to provide privileges to them at my financial/social expense based on the very attributes they claim I use to judge them. I have no issue with equality of opportunity either, but feminists need to realize that if they want equal seating at the trough, they need to be willing to help when it's time to fill it, and when it's time to clean it. No shortcuts or incentives that aren't also offered to everyone else. Her body, her right, her choice? Fine by me, but that also means her responsibility. No using the baby to rope daddy in for an easy meal ticket (or just to stick it to him), at least, not without a signed contract/marriage license. When I bring this up, white knights and most women fly into defensive shitstorms, but the reality is that if women want equality in the eyes of men, they have to give up the expectation of chattel privilege and we need to strip the lobbied-for favoritism out. Affirmative action law and policies must die.
The last 40 years of feminism have made women the most privileged class in western society. Everything is now modeled, shaped, spindled, folded, and mutilated to benefit and cater to them. Thus, nowadays, when women put on melodramas about some guy looking at them in a hallway, or asking them to coffee at work, and then claim they have to set up buddy systems or demand 'safe spaces' as a result, it's really hard for me to take them seriously. It would be a laughable joke if it wasn't also so toxic to men, and western society's long term prospects. Women today just abuse the system to gain leverage in whatever spaces they're in because they know they can get away with it, and it sullies the reputation of those few women who really were assaulted or discriminated against.
I never said that women played no part. It was and largely still is the men who are the interfaces between society and the environment.. They do the majority of the scut work required, and, it's the women who selected the men for breeding based on their abilities. Since I don't see them encouraging girls to line up at the coal mines like they do for management, and that feminists have trouble acknowledging anything positive about men or mens' contributions, I don't buy the claims made by feminists that their movement is about equality for everyone... Identity politics like this are definitely routed in left wing politics.
Define 'sociable'. The problem is that this spectrum is sublabled with a good/bad dichotomy, usually done by the 'educated', soft, extraverted, submissive, and effete people, who consider themselves superior to the more masculine, independent sorts. Despite what is said about them, they do speak and associate with others, but not for its own sake, but rather as part of some other goal, like work or play. They just don't have this incessant need to be around others all the time in order to function. The reality is that this group has its own 'sociability' and hierarchy that works for them. This has nothing to do with intelligence or capability. It's just too blunt and reality focused for most of those effete types to handle without falling to pieces, and naturally the effete groups doing most of the yammering these days associate positive traits like intelligence with the behaviors that make themselves feel good.
Slashdot Mirror
Then why wouldn't you just call it egalitarianism and be done with it. The fact the word itself is gynocentric should tell you something about the intent of its proponents.
You missed his point entirely. It's not 'assault' to call someone a name. The fact you (and others) think that is an example of the problem. Grow some calluses already. Life isn't romper room or a barney episode. Kids need to be taught this again. It might not be acceptable nowadays, but, in the so-called 'adult' world, the passive aggression that results when true feelings can't be aired bluntly causes far more damage. Enforced manners just give bullies a PC wall to hide behind. This is why linus torvalds told sarah sharp where she could shove her victimhood routine. The only way to beat this crap is to nip it in the bud.
School policies today typically apply over-protective barriers around bullied students that deny them opportunities to right the peer-respect imbalance caused by their bullies ("don't hit back or you'll get in trouble too, tell a teacher"). Nothing destroys self esteem and social-standing faster than tattling. This forces them to fester at the bottom social rungs where they can't do squat about the bullies without being expelled themselves. This pressure cooker environment causes untold misery... These zero tolerance policies, the ones that rapidly escalate to expulsion for schoolyard scuffles, are relatively new, and I think they contribute to school shootings and other maladies in society when the students become adults.
These kids need to be taught to stand up for themselves, and, within reason, hash out their schoolyard problems on their own. A few fist fights is a far better outcome than this has been. You might think this is cruel or encourages bad behavior, but the current system is crueler because it forces these kids to suppress their feelings until they crack, and by then it's too late.
nor does it say anything about the arguments made by this small minority. Their arguments stand or fall on their own, regardless of how or where they were published.
We need to stop labeling criticism we don't like as 'hate'. It's basically ad hominem.
No. It proves that jezebel's authors' overly sensitive, fallacy-ridden, crocodile-tear victimhood windbaggery makes them perfect trollbait. Just like the creationists and westboro baptists, it's a case of flies to shit.
The problem is that groupthink begins to dictate what is signal and what is noise.. You don't want too much of that either.
...and you are purposely misrespresenting what I said in those posts. I believe that's a strawman fallacy. I've never said nor implied that women shouldn't be scientists. I did say they should have to run the same gauntlets men have to in order to receive the same reward/respect/degree/salary/raise/promotion/funding etc.
libertarian-fascist? christ, you leftists will misconstrue anything these days.. libertarians are not fascists, nor are they anarcho-capitalists.
how will you extract energy from the plastic waste? burning it will only dump the contents into the atmosphere as particulates which will either be inhaled or rained back into the oceans again.
If they were smart about it, they'd just run the build scripts twice, once with each toolchain.. Surely the process can be automated like the multiplatform OSS projects do, making the overhead cost virtually nil.
universal extractor works wonders for a lot of these, though the last version does have some outdated versions of the extractors. Many of them can be updated manually.
Uh.. CT is at least as lefty as NY is now, esp with the new gun control laws that were passed.
I'm willing to bet there's a way around the installer..
This is what happens when some entity like google tries to idiot proof. We just end up with better idiots. In this case, that infiniti is a far cry from google's claims for its own AV, and already we have morons who think the machine is infallible.
Ever consider that it might be both parties who are guilty of such behavior? The left grows the government at the expense of liberties, and the neocons grow certain businesses at the expense of the free market. Of course, there's plenty of crossover, too.
People can and do use gentoo stable in production environments. It does require a non braindead admin to set it up, but the results are limber and powerful, esp for updating and maintaining large numbers of hosts. The fact you don't even use linux suggests the gp is right. You are the newb here.
By all means, use what you want, but 95% of the software is the same regardless of distro.
for releases with lots of usb updates, how about sarux sharpux?
The programming behind it does, and it either meets your needs or not. The name is irrelevant. Good technical people learn not to use their emotions as first pass filters.
..and people who pick software based on their emotional responses to their internal code names aren't worth worrying about anyway. There is nothing more expensive than an irrational customer.
The seriousness of your project is determined by the engineering quality that when into it, not a string.
wouldn't you agree that we're well on our way though?
We're living it now, in post 9/11 america.
Just because few women have run does not automatically mean that it's men who are keeping them away.
No, I never said that men did everything, nor did I imply it.
I have no issue with coexisting. I do have issue with groups using government to provide privileges to them at my financial/social expense based on the very attributes they claim I use to judge them. I have no issue with equality of opportunity either, but feminists need to realize that if they want equal seating at the trough, they need to be willing to help when it's time to fill it, and when it's time to clean it. No shortcuts or incentives that aren't also offered to everyone else. Her body, her right, her choice? Fine by me, but that also means her responsibility. No using the baby to rope daddy in for an easy meal ticket (or just to stick it to him), at least, not without a signed contract/marriage license. When I bring this up, white knights and most women fly into defensive shitstorms, but the reality is that if women want equality in the eyes of men, they have to give up the expectation of chattel privilege and we need to strip the lobbied-for favoritism out. Affirmative action law and policies must die.
The last 40 years of feminism have made women the most privileged class in western society. Everything is now modeled, shaped, spindled, folded, and mutilated to benefit and cater to them. Thus, nowadays, when women put on melodramas about some guy looking at them in a hallway, or asking them to coffee at work, and then claim they have to set up buddy systems or demand 'safe spaces' as a result, it's really hard for me to take them seriously. It would be a laughable joke if it wasn't also so toxic to men, and western society's long term prospects. Women today just abuse the system to gain leverage in whatever spaces they're in because they know they can get away with it, and it sullies the reputation of those few women who really were assaulted or discriminated against.
I never said that women played no part. It was and largely still is the men who are the interfaces between society and the environment.. They do the majority of the scut work required, and, it's the women who selected the men for breeding based on their abilities. Since I don't see them encouraging girls to line up at the coal mines like they do for management, and that feminists have trouble acknowledging anything positive about men or mens' contributions, I don't buy the claims made by feminists that their movement is about equality for everyone... Identity politics like this are definitely routed in left wing politics.
Define 'sociable'. The problem is that this spectrum is sublabled with a good/bad dichotomy, usually done by the 'educated', soft, extraverted, submissive, and effete people, who consider themselves superior to the more masculine, independent sorts. Despite what is said about them, they do speak and associate with others, but not for its own sake, but rather as part of some other goal, like work or play. They just don't have this incessant need to be around others all the time in order to function. The reality is that this group has its own 'sociability' and hierarchy that works for them. This has nothing to do with intelligence or capability. It's just too blunt and reality focused for most of those effete types to handle without falling to pieces, and naturally the effete groups doing most of the yammering these days associate positive traits like intelligence with the behaviors that make themselves feel good.