It's also thoroughly backdoor'd, feature paywalled, and has shitty audio, even in 'hd' mode... It's also got a shitty GUI and ads.
Jitsi, despite its being written written in java, is a better deal. It's crypted, supports virtually every useful codec and does not require third party servers. Of course, you can use it with third parties if desired. Because of this, it can be configured to offer much better audio quality, which is a major issue with these things it seems. All people care about is the video I guess.
While you may indeed know what you're talking about, you shouldn't use licensing as proof. These days, it's just a way for the government to pick the winners.
Something about republicans being something along the lines of riding a mountain bike on bumpy terrain without a seat.
To continue that analogy, stand-riding is perfectly acceptable, even preferable in those circumstances.. Not every road in life is a well paved, graded, and limited-access superhighway that makes all your (life) travel decisions for you. There is more to life than safety and convenience.
To be fair, democrats fully support living as well as one can from what was earned, except when social lobbies need more money and enforcement, because denying unbridled access to these means society hates minorities, women, reproductive rights, or homosexual orientation. What, what was I talking about again?
You guys lack reading comprehension. Then he gets evicted from his 'condemned' home. This is an artificial consequence placed on him by the local authorities, not a natural one.
As long as this employer doesn't also invade on your home life, then it's fair. I suppose work ends at 5pm for you, and doesn't hassle you until 8am the following business day?
As much as I hate being interrupted by someone's cellphone, this does sound dated...more like some inane thing you'd hear from some aging high school teacher. It's just a powergrab. Knock it off. I doubt you get much respect from your employees when lording it over them like that. If they're not hitting the metrics you want, then look at it on a case by case basis, but really, just about everyone expects cellphone use during meetings now. It's almost a necessity, as you've shown here, to the point where they might as well leave it on the table. They're likely gonna need it.
Maybe, until those 60somethings retire/die off and those 20somethings becomes the new 30, then 40, then 50, then 60somethings.. That's what's called a cultural shift...and if you tolerate your girlfriend throwing a fit because you checked your phone briefly, you're a simp.
Since 90% of what goes on in those meetings involves passive aggressive posturing and yammering, it doesn't surprise me at all. Now, if only these in charge of these meetings would graduate highschool already by letting go of idiotic things like strict dress codes.
I like high framerates and can see the difference, and there are other ways to spend the bandwidth and processing time, like color depth. 24bit is still quite limiting compared to 'real life' color gamut.. Of course, in order to be of benefit, we need displays capable of 'real life' color gamut, and normalizing even a 30bit depth on today's monitors is pointless.
Another place GPU is (ab)used is with antialiasing and post process effects, which many like. I dislike antialiasing because it causes me eye strain with the slightly blurrier image. I'd rather live with the jaggies and have higher framerate. Same with the 'blur' and bloom effects now abused by modern titles. Enough already. It's not 'realistic' in the slightest to have all that blown out color in post processing. Example titles include battlefield 4, bioshock infinite, batman arkham origins, and the codemasters' racing games, though there are plenty of others.
Why should someone who disagrees with obama restrict himself to his healthcare plan? In fact, wouldn't it be myopic to hate him solely because of it? It's not like obama hasn't made other questionable decisions, both as president and as senator. Eg, he voted for the PATRIOT act, and then renewed its provisions as president. For me, that is a large blemish on his record, regardless of his politics.
Maybe, but also a bit fallacious. There's a trend today towards removing long running 'advanced' functionality in order to give the appearance of simplicity.
The pirates aren't the only entitled ones you know. They're responding to the entitled attitudes of the developers who think licensing is a justification for abuse.
Unlike what other technology? Not fire or electricity or television or smartphones or atlatls.
none of those technologies involve free roaming autonomous robots that could decide to maul someone because of faulty hardware or programming. The closest one is fire, and, btw, we still don't have 100% control of that one, and so it is used only in restricted, contained areas for specific tasks and then put out with processes in place to ensure it stays out. The equivalent here is to give the human a steering wheel, throttle, and brake control, and at that point, the human should just drive the damn car.
How do you find out until you let it loose?
With the way people screech about safety these days? You don't. Just because someone managed to figure out how to cook a chicken leg on a little camp fire doesn't mean he should now set the whole forest on fire just to see what happens. You're so ready to demonize human drivers to justify replacing them with something even less adequate? wtf?
No thanks... at least, not yet. Also, there's the political issues over control of the vehicle. These cars will come with remote control and tracking 'features', guaranteed. No thanks to that too.
Pragmatically true, however, it's nat that's the bastard.
No, it doesn't. I suppose your family could install jitsi on their machines.. It depends I guess..
It's also thoroughly backdoor'd, feature paywalled, and has shitty audio, even in 'hd' mode... It's also got a shitty GUI and ads.
Jitsi, despite its being written written in java, is a better deal. It's crypted, supports virtually every useful codec and does not require third party servers. Of course, you can use it with third parties if desired. Because of this, it can be configured to offer much better audio quality, which is a major issue with these things it seems. All people care about is the video I guess.
While you may indeed know what you're talking about, you shouldn't use licensing as proof. These days, it's just a way for the government to pick the winners.
Something about republicans being something along the lines of riding a mountain bike on bumpy terrain without a seat.
To continue that analogy, stand-riding is perfectly acceptable, even preferable in those circumstances.. Not every road in life is a well paved, graded, and limited-access superhighway that makes all your (life) travel decisions for you. There is more to life than safety and convenience.
To be fair, democrats fully support living as well as one can from what was earned, except when social lobbies need more money and enforcement, because denying unbridled access to these means society hates minorities, women, reproductive rights, or homosexual orientation. What, what was I talking about again?
You guys lack reading comprehension. Then he gets evicted from his 'condemned' home. This is an artificial consequence placed on him by the local authorities, not a natural one.
I suppose liberals are communists then?
Don't evade. Acknowledge the fact it's a shitty law.
..or far left wing groups.
As long as this employer doesn't also invade on your home life, then it's fair. I suppose work ends at 5pm for you, and doesn't hassle you until 8am the following business day?
As much as I hate being interrupted by someone's cellphone, this does sound dated...more like some inane thing you'd hear from some aging high school teacher. It's just a powergrab. Knock it off. I doubt you get much respect from your employees when lording it over them like that. If they're not hitting the metrics you want, then look at it on a case by case basis, but really, just about everyone expects cellphone use during meetings now. It's almost a necessity, as you've shown here, to the point where they might as well leave it on the table. They're likely gonna need it.
Maybe, until those 60somethings retire/die off and those 20somethings becomes the new 30, then 40, then 50, then 60somethings.. That's what's called a cultural shift. ..and if you tolerate your girlfriend throwing a fit because you checked your phone briefly, you're a simp.
Since 90% of what goes on in those meetings involves passive aggressive posturing and yammering, it doesn't surprise me at all. Now, if only these in charge of these meetings would graduate highschool already by letting go of idiotic things like strict dress codes.
only 60? pff, 120 please..
I like high framerates and can see the difference, and there are other ways to spend the bandwidth and processing time, like color depth. 24bit is still quite limiting compared to 'real life' color gamut.. Of course, in order to be of benefit, we need displays capable of 'real life' color gamut, and normalizing even a 30bit depth on today's monitors is pointless.
Another place GPU is (ab)used is with antialiasing and post process effects, which many like. I dislike antialiasing because it causes me eye strain with the slightly blurrier image. I'd rather live with the jaggies and have higher framerate. Same with the 'blur' and bloom effects now abused by modern titles. Enough already. It's not 'realistic' in the slightest to have all that blown out color in post processing. Example titles include battlefield 4, bioshock infinite, batman arkham origins, and the codemasters' racing games, though there are plenty of others.
See, to me, DLP has this rainbow effect on the colors, with the outer edges looking on the fuzzy side.
You must be blind then.
Same is true with LCD backlights, CCFL or LED.
Then he'd be as unjust as his lazy family members. He'd lose their respect and the result would be multilateral passive aggression from all corners.
Why should someone who disagrees with obama restrict himself to his healthcare plan? In fact, wouldn't it be myopic to hate him solely because of it? It's not like obama hasn't made other questionable decisions, both as president and as senator. Eg, he voted for the PATRIOT act, and then renewed its provisions as president. For me, that is a large blemish on his record, regardless of his politics.
The decline of society continues..
Maybe, but also a bit fallacious. There's a trend today towards removing long running 'advanced' functionality in order to give the appearance of simplicity.
The pirates aren't the only entitled ones you know. They're responding to the entitled attitudes of the developers who think licensing is a justification for abuse.
Unlike what other technology? Not fire or electricity or television or smartphones or atlatls.
none of those technologies involve free roaming autonomous robots that could decide to maul someone because of faulty hardware or programming. The closest one is fire, and, btw, we still don't have 100% control of that one, and so it is used only in restricted, contained areas for specific tasks and then put out with processes in place to ensure it stays out. The equivalent here is to give the human a steering wheel, throttle, and brake control, and at that point, the human should just drive the damn car.
How do you find out until you let it loose?
With the way people screech about safety these days? You don't. Just because someone managed to figure out how to cook a chicken leg on a little camp fire doesn't mean he should now set the whole forest on fire just to see what happens. You're so ready to demonize human drivers to justify replacing them with something even less adequate? wtf?
No thanks... at least, not yet. Also, there's the political issues over control of the vehicle. These cars will come with remote control and tracking 'features', guaranteed. No thanks to that too.