Interesting. I like it for a different reason. I'd rather see ads for something I might actually want than for something that is completely irrelevant to me.
I've found the Apple IOS and Objective C docs to be fantastic - well organized, with search, examples, and you can link to them in your code by clicking on a method call. And if you want a tutorial, Stanford has FREE iTunes courses about programming for IOS.
Once again counting the cost of hardware against iOS development. Fail. You must have computer to develop software. Many college students have macs, FYI.
I never said Democrats had passed a budget. I only showed that the President had submitted a budget to the House, contradicting your claim that he had not. There is plenty of blame to go around, but pretending the president hadn't submitted one to the House was untrue. Even your links don't make that claim.
BOTH parties are the reason things aren't getting done, though I give kudos to the Republicans for *trying* (they keep passing bills that the Dems are too scared to even allow on the floor).
How quickly you forget how many times the Republicans filibustered when the Democratic House was passing bills.
I don't know why this is modded up to 5 when it's verifiably false. Their demos were a month or so apart, with F700 coming a bit later, and LG Prada with similar design came out a few months before them both.
Because many moderators just mod-up anything that fits their narrative. That happens on both sides of this stupid issue.
Nice slippery comment there, "I hate but". Really who gives a crap. Reality is Apple had a fad product it knew it, it knew it was eventually doomed to collapse as all fad products are and is attempting to fend off that collapse as long as possible, via the laws courts and basically damn the consequences (the retaliation will not end once the delay is over, break a cease fire and the rest go in for the kill). As for those schmucks who have invested heavily in Apple's wildly inflated share price, two words, 'KA-BOOM'.
Nice fandroid wet dream there. Apple has been growing wildly in sales and market cap for years now.
Apple is a far far far larger bubble than Facebook. Wait for that Mountain to pop. When the most valuable stock in the world belongs to what's basically a toy company, you know you've got a problem.
So then why all the sympathy for Samsung? They have their own history of patent suits long before their current spat with Apple. They have also been part of cartels that have conspired in price fixing on DRAM chips and LCD panels, etc. Samsung is one of the companies least worthy of sympathy right up their with Apple themselves. Samsung has contributed to the patent idiocy and should have no sympathy when it is brought to bear on them.
Why not use a Galaxy Tab, Transformer Prime, Android phone, or any comparable device as long as it has the necessary information? Avilution is one example, there are several others.
Perhaps the phrase "FAA permits..." in the summary escaped your notice.
The one place you won't find such discounts, however, is the iBookstore, Apple has opted to fight the Justice Department and go to trial alongside Penguin and MacMillan next year.
Why am I not surprised? Price fixing and monopolistic bullshit even when they don't actually have a monopoly is Apple's bread and butter.
I believe that Amazon selling eBooks for less than they pay publishers to drive out competition is more monopolistic bullshit behavior than not providing discounts.
Seriously. I've been at companies that do all day interviews and those are pointless. Group after group of people come in and ask the people almost identical questions. If it takes you more than an hour or two to determine someone's skill and personality then you are probably doing it wrong. If someone asked me to spend a week working before they would even consider me I'd laugh and tell them to have a great day. If some company I never heard of asked me to book 5+ hours for an interview, I'd tell them no thanks as well, unless I was absolutely desperate. I have better things to do with my time.
But what if the benefits of employment were fantastic? Like hot blondes give you blowjobs while you code?
2% different is alot of differences when your looking at a million entries. Of course the theives could of added bogus data to the list in order to hide its origens. Or appened one data set with another in order have over a million records.
Perhaps their database has changed since it was hacked?
They both are socialist programs- Neither is socialized medicine per se more rightly socialized health care. The only difference is whether you pay a middle man first or not, but the government control and forced participation is there. The government is still in control of the treatment options.
Nice spin, but in the end what you cannot spin are real unemployment numbers, which suck (8.3% with a ton of people out of the labor force as they gave up looking).
You don't think that "the government" forcing everyone to get insurance because it makes it cheaper in the long run for those already with insurance isn't socializing it? You don't think that increasing taxes and taking money from medicare in order to provide insurance for the poor isn't socializing it?
It may not be your ideal utopia of socialism but it isn't exactly not socialism either.
Wake up call! Medicare is socialized medicine. Obamacare is not.
Slashdot Mirror
Note that it can assist or INHIBIT movement in leg joints. I smell a new type of handcuffs.
Interesting. I like it for a different reason. I'd rather see ads for something I might actually want than for something that is completely irrelevant to me.
So let's make government small enough so U.S. Congressmen's opinions don't matter.
A free people in a free country wouldn't care what some Congressman thought about evolution.
Actually, you should make the government LARGER if you want said Congressman's opinions not to matter - it's called dilution.
It's a BEHAVIOR problem. There is no such thing as a technical solution to a behavior problem.
I take it you've never heard of B.F. Skinner.
I've found the Apple IOS and Objective C docs to be fantastic - well organized, with search, examples, and you can link to them in your code by clicking on a method call. And if you want a tutorial, Stanford has FREE iTunes courses about programming for IOS.
Once again counting the cost of hardware against iOS development. Fail. You must have computer to develop software. Many college students have macs, FYI.
I never said Democrats had passed a budget. I only showed that the President had submitted a budget to the House, contradicting your claim that he had not. There is plenty of blame to go around, but pretending the president hadn't submitted one to the House was untrue. Even your links don't make that claim.
And how quickly you forget the budget bills sitting on Harry Reid's desk.
You must mean the ones that eliminate the capital gains taxes as pushed by Ryan; the ones that would reduce Romney's taxes to less than 1%.
This is modded insightful? Wow, fandroids, you need to look up "insightful."
BOTH parties are the reason things aren't getting done, though I give kudos to the Republicans for *trying* (they keep passing bills that the Dems are too scared to even allow on the floor).
How quickly you forget how many times the Republicans filibustered when the Democratic House was passing bills.
However, the President has given the House no budget in the last 3 years.
Nice attempt at a blame game. The President has submitted budgets:
2013: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_United_States_federal_budget
2012: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_United_States_federal_budget
2011: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_United_States_federal_budget
2010: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_United_States_federal_budget
Do you really think the amount Samsung had to pay Apple was reasonable?
Everyone on /. has an opinion on that, despite whether or not they even understand the monies involved in the smartphone market.
I don't know why this is modded up to 5 when it's verifiably false. Their demos were a month or so apart, with F700 coming a bit later, and LG Prada with similar design came out a few months before them both.
Because many moderators just mod-up anything that fits their narrative. That happens on both sides of this stupid issue.
Nice slippery comment there, "I hate but". Really who gives a crap. Reality is Apple had a fad product it knew it, it knew it was eventually doomed to collapse as all fad products are and is attempting to fend off that collapse as long as possible, via the laws courts and basically damn the consequences (the retaliation will not end once the delay is over, break a cease fire and the rest go in for the kill). As for those schmucks who have invested heavily in Apple's wildly inflated share price, two words, 'KA-BOOM'.
Nice fandroid wet dream there. Apple has been growing wildly in sales and market cap for years now.
Apple is a far far far larger bubble than Facebook. Wait for that Mountain to pop. When the most valuable stock in the world belongs to what's basically a toy company, you know you've got a problem.
Sounds entirely like a fandroid fantasy.
You should look up democratic socialism and Leninism.
Post the link to the Glenn Beck video for me.
So then why all the sympathy for Samsung? They have their own history of patent suits long before their current spat with Apple. They have also been part of cartels that have conspired in price fixing on DRAM chips and LCD panels, etc. Samsung is one of the companies least worthy of sympathy right up their with Apple themselves. Samsung has contributed to the patent idiocy and should have no sympathy when it is brought to bear on them.
Because Apple are evil! Kill!
Why not use a Galaxy Tab, Transformer Prime, Android phone, or any comparable device as long as it has the necessary information? Avilution is one example, there are several others.
Perhaps the phrase "FAA permits..." in the summary escaped your notice.
From a different article about this story:
Why am I not surprised? Price fixing and monopolistic bullshit even when they don't actually have a monopoly is Apple's bread and butter.
I believe that Amazon selling eBooks for less than they pay publishers to drive out competition is more monopolistic bullshit behavior than not providing discounts.
War on prosperity?
That's the right-wing's new stupid meme. They're trying to equate rich people paying their fare share to their War on Women.
Seriously. I've been at companies that do all day interviews and those are pointless. Group after group of people come in and ask the people almost identical questions. If it takes you more than an hour or two to determine someone's skill and personality then you are probably doing it wrong. If someone asked me to spend a week working before they would even consider me I'd laugh and tell them to have a great day. If some company I never heard of asked me to book 5+ hours for an interview, I'd tell them no thanks as well, unless I was absolutely desperate. I have better things to do with my time.
But what if the benefits of employment were fantastic? Like hot blondes give you blowjobs while you code?
2% different is alot of differences when your looking at a million entries. Of course the theives could of added bogus data to the list in order to hide its origens. Or appened one data set with another in order have over a million records.
Perhaps their database has changed since it was hacked?
They both are socialist programs- Neither is socialized medicine per se more rightly socialized health care. The only difference is whether you pay a middle man first or not, but the government control and forced participation is there. The government is still in control of the treatment options.
You need to look up socialism.
Nice spin, but in the end what you cannot spin are real unemployment numbers, which suck (8.3% with a ton of people out of the labor force as they gave up looking).
Yes, and the economy was shedding jobs at 8M/mo when Bush left office. You can't just turn that shit off in an instant. See this chart: http://techpresident.com/blog-entry/making-sure-everyone-america-has-seen-pelosi-jobs-chart
You don't think that "the government" forcing everyone to get insurance because it makes it cheaper in the long run for those already with insurance isn't socializing it? You don't think that increasing taxes and taking money from medicare in order to provide insurance for the poor isn't socializing it?
It may not be your ideal utopia of socialism but it isn't exactly not socialism either.
Wake up call! Medicare is socialized medicine. Obamacare is not.