This article is posted in the Satire section of Salon, so isn't really meant to be an example of something that will actually be released.
So you don't have to worry about random explosions, and feeding the creator of the world for a horrible book addiction. I just wonder what you would do with 200 kilos of books... arn't they better if you use small print?
Evaluating customer reviews is a lot like evaluating a website on a one by one basis. Every time a review comes in you have to take into account what sort of thing the reviewer is looking for and if you can, credentials. If your looking for something really oddball you might want to take the reviews as just a general overview of what's available, and take them arbitrarily. If your looking for whether it's something that's really worthwhile to read you might want to look into credentials and other things.
It's a little strange but, a precident for this was set in 2004, for the olympics.
But the ruling that websites don't have to make sites accessable is a little silly... if you follow the tips decent "how to write html" tutorials give you a site can be mostly accessable. It also sets a new precident without overruling a previous one, so the legal system is that much more mucky.
This article is posted in the Satire section of Salon, so isn't really meant to be an example of something that will actually be released. So you don't have to worry about random explosions, and feeding the creator of the world for a horrible book addiction. I just wonder what you would do with 200 kilos of books... arn't they better if you use small print?
Evaluating customer reviews is a lot like evaluating a website on a one by one basis. Every time a review comes in you have to take into account what sort of thing the reviewer is looking for and if you can, credentials. If your looking for something really oddball you might want to take the reviews as just a general overview of what's available, and take them arbitrarily. If your looking for whether it's something that's really worthwhile to read you might want to look into credentials and other things.
It's a little strange but, a precident for this was set in 2004, for the olympics. But the ruling that websites don't have to make sites accessable is a little silly... if you follow the tips decent "how to write html" tutorials give you a site can be mostly accessable. It also sets a new precident without overruling a previous one, so the legal system is that much more mucky.