read to fast. actually its worse the paragraph before makes it more clear that it is not free software.
"As the author and copyright holder of this source code, I personally have no problem with anyone studying it, modifying it, attempting to run it, etc. Please understand that this does NOT constitute a grant of rights of any kind in Prince of Persia, which is an ongoing Ubisoft game franchise. Ubisoft alone has the right to make and distribute Prince of Persia games."
Although the source is available I see no licensing information. The closest it comes is ". In the meantime, if you have questions -- technical, legal, or otherwise -- I recommend that you direct them to the community at large, whose collective knowledge and expertise far exceeds mine, and will only increase as more people get their eyes on this code."
So the source may be available but not free software or open source.
thank you. There have been hundreds of hurricanes that have hit the gulf cost one in fifty cause a problem. No one ever thinks this is gonna be the big one, except the media, which think every hurricane is the big one.
actually microsoft settled all disputes with apple about this years ago, and they would probably be the most likely to stop this, as for the other earlier arrivals I believe microsoft has an understanding with them as well.
>However, refusing users to shimmy in a binary module themselves is wrong. The GPL clearly states that it only covers distribution, not usage, so users are perfectly entitled to do whatever they want to the kernel as long as they do not distribute it. Adding a check to refuse loading of binary modules would only lead to a fork of the kernel, which is unproductive and unhelpful.
I think some very friendly people over at the fsf would care to disagree with you ^_^. The GPL is primarily a license covering distribution, but if you go read the license it also covers modification, so when you add your propitiatory module into the code you have violated section 2.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LinkingWi thGPL
The problem is Linus has been so lax on this that it is so rampant in the linux kernel it seems like the norm.
Both comics produce far to much money, esp. with debates like these to generate more revenue etc etc...
however spiderman is probably #1 has almost no reason to fight, batman has cash, superman is invincible, spiderman is pretty much every day joe
Slashdot Mirror
read to fast. actually its worse the paragraph before makes it more clear that it is not free software. "As the author and copyright holder of this source code, I personally have no problem with anyone studying it, modifying it, attempting to run it, etc. Please understand that this does NOT constitute a grant of rights of any kind in Prince of Persia, which is an ongoing Ubisoft game franchise. Ubisoft alone has the right to make and distribute Prince of Persia games."
Although the source is available I see no licensing information. The closest it comes is ". In the meantime, if you have questions -- technical, legal, or otherwise -- I recommend that you direct them to the community at large, whose collective knowledge and expertise far exceeds mine, and will only increase as more people get their eyes on this code." So the source may be available but not free software or open source.
thank you. There have been hundreds of hurricanes that have hit the gulf cost one in fifty cause a problem. No one ever thinks this is gonna be the big one, except the media, which think every hurricane is the big one.
actually microsoft settled all disputes with apple about this years ago, and they would probably be the most likely to stop this, as for the other earlier arrivals I believe microsoft has an understanding with them as well.
>However, refusing users to shimmy in a binary module themselves is wrong. The GPL clearly states that it only covers distribution, not usage, so users are perfectly entitled to do whatever they want to the kernel as long as they do not distribute it. Adding a check to refuse loading of binary modules would only lead to a fork of the kernel, which is unproductive and unhelpful. I think some very friendly people over at the fsf would care to disagree with you ^_^. The GPL is primarily a license covering distribution, but if you go read the license it also covers modification, so when you add your propitiatory module into the code you have violated section 2. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LinkingWi thGPL
The problem is Linus has been so lax on this that it is so rampant in the linux kernel it seems like the norm.
not astrix or asstricks or even trixast etc please get it right....
google is your friend.... in short its a phone system.
second post
So now I dont need to go out to the switchbox or build a complicated cable descrambler, just airsnort and get to work on cracking encryption ^_^
I think ever animal deservers a warm meal mwahahhahahahah..
Both comics produce far to much money, esp. with debates like these to generate more revenue etc etc... however spiderman is probably #1 has almost no reason to fight, batman has cash, superman is invincible, spiderman is pretty much every day joe