Sorry, you failed to notice that emacs can do all those things as well. (I don't know about vi, it probably also can.)
Anyway, if your IDE can make better decisions than you can, the language you are writting on needs too many decisions. If some piece of software can make decisions about it, decide it on the compiler, and stop nagging the programers.
If he is any good, he will get another job, and live you now (in the near future), also, he'll not be motivated, and maybe his productivity and work quality will go down if you refuse.
Compare that with a happy person, that likes working for you, but may, or may not live you in a few years.
What kind of person chooses the former? (I was going to say a sociopat, but no, sociopats are interested in increasing their own gain.)
Order your folders by year. And separate on different folders what must live for 1, 5, or 10 years (it will be already separated if you order your documents by subject). Now all the trouble of discarding the unneded paper means only going into your cabinet, and discarding the contents of a few folders.
When two or more people met, everything they do is political. There is no possible modern meaning different from that.
But, of course, that also puts in a ridiculous light the people complaining that Wikipedia is being political. Of course it is. Choosing GD was also a political move, ditto for deciding to host pages.
Now, of course, that assumes we need one more reason for ridicularizing people that complain that NGOs are acting in a political way. I would disagree here.
That "I don't want your money, because you already demonstrated that if I start to work contrary to your interest you'll stop giving me your money" is ridiculous. If you want a hint, when you start a business don't act contrary to your clients' interest. They don't like it.
True, but public opinion isn't changed by the fact that 0.2% of the vote went to Generic Third Party #17. Not even a little bit.
I understand that US elections are doomed by that one turn only thing... But even then you are looking at things in an inverted way. It is the pool that must change because of public opinion, not the other way around.
By the way, are your elections for Congress also not representative? Because that is the most important vote you have (yeah, even at the US).
Things never happened this way, why do you think the ones in-the-know will start behaving like that now?
People will create new channels, only the in-the-know will use them at first. But they'll pass the secret to their friends, and that will be welcome, since those friends will bring new stuff. Then suddenly, by the power of exponential growth, the channel will be big, and lawyers will take notice. Just before that new channels will be created, and just a few will be in-the know...
That is how it has even been, there is no reason for that to change now.
I really do not know how much the community contributed to the open source drivers. But at least AMD got some market share in exchange for doing that work. And if they open source their programmable interface you can bet they'll get some more market.
Of course, if there have been a murder, and some encrypted file is the only evidence the police has against their suspect, investigators aren't making any effort at all. Is there any body to be found, or was the dead person a game character?
Of course electricity can make things orbit. Anything that pushes stuff toghether can make things orbit.
Also, if that something pushes with a force that doesn't change with the 1/r^2 that gravity and electricity do, you can create some quite interesting orbits. Try a string sometime.
Earth's scape velocity is 10.735 km/s at the Equator. A 100kg men (an obese one) would need 5,8e9 J for reaching that speed, or a bit less than 171 liters of gasoline. (Isn't Wikipedia great? There is a XKCD about that.)
Of course, if you ever intent to get there by a rocket, that need will increase a lot (except if it is nuclear). Also, if you intent to actualy use gasoline on your rocket, you can already forget it.
A user sending important data for somebody that he shouldn't trust does not make a man-in-the-middle. At most, if you assume malicious intent, it can be a social engineering atack.
It means that they are not just any kind of middleman, but a trusted one. Have you take even a glance on the meaning of the word "trusted"? Your ISP isn't a trusted middleman for your email services if you encript it, but it is if you don't encrypt.
Slashdot Mirror
Sorry, you failed to notice that emacs can do all those things as well. (I don't know about vi, it probably also can.)
Anyway, if your IDE can make better decisions than you can, the language you are writting on needs too many decisions. If some piece of software can make decisions about it, decide it on the compiler, and stop nagging the programers.
There, FIFY.
If he is any good, he will get another job, and live you now (in the near future), also, he'll not be motivated, and maybe his productivity and work quality will go down if you refuse.
Compare that with a happy person, that likes working for you, but may, or may not live you in a few years.
What kind of person chooses the former? (I was going to say a sociopat, but no, sociopats are interested in increasing their own gain.)
Order your folders by year. And separate on different folders what must live for 1, 5, or 10 years (it will be already separated if you order your documents by subject). Now all the trouble of discarding the unneded paper means only going into your cabinet, and discarding the contents of a few folders.
And the best part is that you are currently rated +3 (nothing - just underrated), while the GP with practical advice is stuck at 0.
I can't blame you or the mods, since I share this feeling. But well, it makes no sense.
Well, if you ever see a gnu hurd comming your way, run away! As fast as you can!
There was, but it was deemed not relevant, and erased.
Why would anybody use GD for hosting?
When two or more people met, everything they do is political. There is no possible modern meaning different from that.
But, of course, that also puts in a ridiculous light the people complaining that Wikipedia is being political. Of course it is. Choosing GD was also a political move, ditto for deciding to host pages.
Now, of course, that assumes we need one more reason for ridicularizing people that complain that NGOs are acting in a political way. I would disagree here.
You don't own a business do you?
That "I don't want your money, because you already demonstrated that if I start to work contrary to your interest you'll stop giving me your money" is ridiculous. If you want a hint, when you start a business don't act contrary to your clients' interest. They don't like it.
I understand that US elections are doomed by that one turn only thing... But even then you are looking at things in an inverted way. It is the pool that must change because of public opinion, not the other way around.
By the way, are your elections for Congress also not representative? Because that is the most important vote you have (yeah, even at the US).
Thus GD does support waterboarding. I was expecting that to be FUD.
You can do that with Debian for half a decade already.
And what will Linux do that Windows 8 doesn't when Win8 finally gets on the market?
Or maybe:
When will people start to care about paying for low quality products when hight quality ones are free?
I've heard that phrase before, from MS. Last times they've said that, they couldn't release and the product flopped.
When is their release date again?
Things never happened this way, why do you think the ones in-the-know will start behaving like that now?
People will create new channels, only the in-the-know will use them at first. But they'll pass the secret to their friends, and that will be welcome, since those friends will bring new stuff. Then suddenly, by the power of exponential growth, the channel will be big, and lawyers will take notice. Just before that new channels will be created, and just a few will be in-the know...
That is how it has even been, there is no reason for that to change now.
Treat it like plain text http in every way. Do the cookie go through http?
I really do not know how much the community contributed to the open source drivers. But at least AMD got some market share in exchange for doing that work. And if they open source their programmable interface you can bet they'll get some more market.
Of course, if there have been a murder, and some encrypted file is the only evidence the police has against their suspect, investigators aren't making any effort at all. Is there any body to be found, or was the dead person a game character?
Of course electricity can make things orbit. Anything that pushes stuff toghether can make things orbit.
Also, if that something pushes with a force that doesn't change with the 1/r^2 that gravity and electricity do, you can create some quite interesting orbits. Try a string sometime.
Earth's scape velocity is 10.735 km/s at the Equator. A 100kg men (an obese one) would need 5,8e9 J for reaching that speed, or a bit less than 171 liters of gasoline. (Isn't Wikipedia great? There is a XKCD about that.)
Of course, if you ever intent to get there by a rocket, that need will increase a lot (except if it is nuclear). Also, if you intent to actualy use gasoline on your rocket, you can already forget it.
A user sending important data for somebody that he shouldn't trust does not make a man-in-the-middle. At most, if you assume malicious intent, it can be a social engineering atack.
Well, if you use Facebook, you do trust them.
It means that they are not just any kind of middleman, but a trusted one. Have you take even a glance on the meaning of the word "trusted"? Your ISP isn't a trusted middleman for your email services if you encript it, but it is if you don't encrypt.
Slashdot just surprized me last week with a better crop of ads :) I even clicked on them... The first time in several years.
Anyway, it is quite obvious that /. and Facebook are ad supported. Do you think there is somebody that doesn't know that already?