Slashdot Mirror


User: MachineShedFred

MachineShedFred's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,735
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,735

  1. Re: Lets see how far back... on Apple SSL Bug In iOS Also Affects OS X · · Score: 1

    When they refer to it as a moving target, they probably mean that the stuff they're trying to build on top of it breaks far too often because there's too much change.

    Moving target for security = good.
    Moving target for foundation to build on = not as good.

  2. Re:Lets see how far back... on Apple SSL Bug In iOS Also Affects OS X · · Score: 1

    10.8.5 isn't even effected, why would any previous version be? This is strictly an iOS 6.x, iOS 7.x and Mac OS X 10.9.x bug.

  3. Re:Translation: Piss off, Peasants on White House Responds To Net Neutrality Petition · · Score: 1

    He can still apply the "full authority" given to him, it's just a meaningless, toothless amount of regulative power now.

  4. Re:Translation: Piss off, Peasants on White House Responds To Net Neutrality Petition · · Score: 1

    He didn't do shit, other than sign his name to CONGRESSIONAL appropriation bills.

    CONGRESS controls spending, CONGRESS controls debt. The Executive only enacts the laws that CONGRESS passes saying what money should go where; if tax receipts don't match up with the spending that is authorized by CONGRESS, then the Executive comes up with the money the only way they can - with the debt that CONGRESS already authorized, or will authorize by raising the statutory debt ceiling, created by CONGRESS.

    See who's really responsible yet?

  5. Re:People That Cite The Debt/Deficit on White House Responds To Net Neutrality Petition · · Score: 2

    Ahh, the debt ceiling argument.

    We wouldn't have to have Congress raise the debt ceiling, if Congress would stop authorizing spending that necessitates the creation of more debt. Let's see if we can make this a bit more simple:

    1. Congress passes a binding law saying that the government WILL spend $X on $Y.
    2. The Executive branch then complies with the law, spending $X on $Y. However, $X happens to be less than $Z in federal tax receipts, so $B treasury bonds need to be sold in order to comply with the law passed in step 1, where $Z + $B = $X.
    3. Congress then shits themselves inside out about the debt that is being created in order to comply with THEIR OWN FUCKING LAW.
    4. They then have "think tanks" and "policy institutes" go on talk radio and news shows spewing complete bullshit about "if I have to balance my checkbook, the GUBBMINT should do the same!!"

    They have three options:
    A) raise the statutory debt ceiling so that the Executive can comply with what the Congress told them to do
    B) change the appropriation bills to reduce spending, eliminating the need to increase debt
    C) default on past debt obligations (created by past Congresses from the above procedure) and collapse the entire world economy by reducing faith in US Treasury Bonds to zero, and making it impossible for the US Treasury to get the necessary funds to meet their Congressionally-created legal obligations.

    Get it?

  6. Re:People That Cite The Debt/Deficit on White House Responds To Net Neutrality Petition · · Score: 1

    it's especially silly when the President, spending all those dump trucks of cash, is only complying with the law that Congress passed. Outside of signing the appropriations bills, the President has fuck-all to do with setting spending levels.

  7. Re:Translation: Piss off, Peasants on White House Responds To Net Neutrality Petition · · Score: 2

    It's actually more severe than that - the legislative brach passes BINDING LAWS that appropriate money, and the executive branch merely complies with the laws passed.

    Everyone likes to blame the President for budget deficits, but outside of asking nicely for stuff at the beginning of the process, and putting his signature on whatever comes back from Congress in the end, he / she has fuck-all to do with how it's divided up. That's how the Founders wanted it, and that's how it still is.

  8. Re:oxymoron on Google Tells Glass Users Not To Be 'Creepy Or Rude' · · Score: 1

    Because in the history of electronics, there has never been a way to conceal or disable an LED.

  9. Re:Illiterate? on Windows 8 Metro: The Good Kind of Market Segmentation? · · Score: 1

    And what's even more funny, is that there have been numerous reporters that have brought their iPad with them to those tribes in the Amazon, or the jungles of the Congo, and they figured out how to use it in about 5 seconds with no instruction whatsoever, as they didn't speak the same language as the reporter.

    Metro / Modern fails in every way except for one: it is a pretty good kiosk interface. Licensors of Windows Embedded will love it - stupidly easy to use with a touchscreen, and you can lock it up like a motherfucker using existing policy tools. For general computing though, it's a horrendous fucking mess.

  10. Re:good thing it's discoverable on Windows 8 Metro: The Good Kind of Market Segmentation? · · Score: 2

    What, move your mouse to the right edge until a huge gutter of icons appears, then clicking "Settings" in order to find a button to shut down / restart isn't your idea of intuitive?

    Remember: this is the company that gave us "start > shut down" - you have to start before you can stop!

  11. Re:Any operational advantages of the merger? on Krugman: Say No To Comcast Acquisition of Time Warner · · Score: 1

    Why squash one competitor, when you can squash the whole field?

    Yes, they could buy Netflix, and that would take care of Netflix. It does nothing about Hulu, Amazon, Google, Apple, etc.

    If you buy the subscriber network, and then behave like fuckwits because the government is paralyzed and won't prevent you from being fuckwits, you fuck over all of them (and anyone else that might not be on the radar yet) in one move.

  12. Re:Any operational advantages of the merger? on Krugman: Say No To Comcast Acquisition of Time Warner · · Score: 1

    Well, Time Warner's operating costs go down, because they are now owned by the same company that owns NBC Universal. Comcast then gets to renegotiate carrier contracts with other content providers based on the combined subscriber counts, leveraging larger volume to get better pricing. Then, they get to put the screws to any content delivery service that uses their IP service by packet shaping and being general assholes, making their shitty pay-per-view service look better than the competition.

    Oh, and don't forget the part where the combined entity is less than the sum of it's parts from a quality and customer service perspective - if a company is using a slightly more expensive, but slightly less shitty piece of equipment, that will be discontinued in favor of the cheaper, shittier model gained in the merge.

    That's off the top of my head.

  13. Re:Ok on Krugman: Say No To Comcast Acquisition of Time Warner · · Score: 1

    It's especially stupid when you consider that you aren't even using the electric company's electrons, but rather the ones already present in your house wiring. You're just paying someone to make them move around a bit.

  14. Re:Cut food stamps; send useless probes on Astronomers Make the Science Case For a Mission To Neptune and Uranus · · Score: 2

    Because scientific knowledge and discovery has NEVER EVEN ONCE resulted in better economies, new products, innovation and applied science in commercial products, or advances in the general state of manufacturing arts.

    There's no better investment of government money.

  15. Re:Surprise on Study Finds Methane Leaks Negate Benefits of Natural Gas-Powered Vehicles · · Score: 1

    Because coal is so dirty that practically ANYTHING is "clean" in comparison.

  16. Re:Manipulative headline on Study Finds Methane Leaks Negate Benefits of Natural Gas-Powered Vehicles · · Score: 1

    and just do what it takes to make fission...

    We already did that. The problems with nuclear power are problems of emotion and education, not technology. Yet it's the most opposed form of generation out there.

  17. Re:Antitrust lawsuit? on Comcast To Buy Time Warner Cable In $44.2 Billion All-Stock Deal · · Score: 1

    You're an optimist.

    When it comes to telcos and cable operators, suck is multiplicative .

  18. Re:SEC block? on Comcast To Buy Time Warner Cable In $44.2 Billion All-Stock Deal · · Score: 1

    I don't even look at their channel guide, because the show I'm looking for will be over by the time I find it. Seriously, it shows like 5 channels at a time on a HD display, because they can't stop showing you fucking ads for their rape-per-view content; and takes 15 seconds to load the next 5 when you hit the up / down button.

    TimeWarner's equipment is shit, the service is shit, the quality is shit. They only thing they had going for them is that they weren't Comcast, and now they don't even have that.

  19. Re:Whose phone is banned? on House Committee Approves Bill Banning In-Flight Phone Calls · · Score: 1

    Because the Congress doesn't get to write laws concerning your local bus system, except for laws regarding safety equipment the bus must have to operate on the Federal Highway System.

    Trains, too; unless we're talking Amtrak.

  20. Re:brighter? on Laser Headlights Promise More Intense, Controllable Beams · · Score: 1

    Unless the design doesn't have the laser emitter also pointed forward. Stupidly simple to not have that happen.

  21. Here today, gone tomorrow. on Military Electronics That Shatter Into Dust On Command · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, we're here generating traffic. Today.

    Piss off your users, and they first get loud and tell you what you're doing wrong. Then, they get quiet. REAL quiet. As in, no longer visiting your site. And, for Slashdot, if people aren't visiting, then they aren't posting, they aren't submitting stories, and they aren't looking at your ads.

  22. Re:I'm switching to Lynx. on Amazon's Double-Helix Acquisition Hints At Gaming Console · · Score: 1

    It pains me to see that this classic Slashdot flame has been used, and nobody even recognized it.

    There's more than just Beta ruining this site, unfortunately.

  23. Re:fuckbeta in your favorite language. on Is Intel Selling Bay Trail Chips Below Cost? · · Score: 2


    use strict;
    my $slashdot = shift;

    while($slashdot =~ /[Bb]eta/ ) {
              print "Fuck Beta\n";
    }

  24. Re:Editors are scared on Is Intel Selling Bay Trail Chips Below Cost? · · Score: 1

    Good, then it means they are at least SEEING the feedback. Doesn't mean they'll act on it though...

  25. Re:Fork Slashdot? on Build an Open-Source Electric Car In About One Hour · · Score: 1

    Slashcode, at least the last time I took a look at it, was ass-old and a complete pain to get installed on any modern Linux. It may well make for a good start point though.