Anyone who has ever built a data-driven website knows this. You never actually DELETE a record from a database.
You should know that this is probably illegal under GPDR. Yes, that is going to cause problems with database design, for reasons that anyone who has ever built a data-driven website knows.
Fuchsia is Google's NIH solution to the Linux kernel. They got tired of running their own custom fork (because it takes effort to merge) and thought it might be easier to make their own kernel. It's mainly a kernel.
Oh, first you were talking about a single worldwide timezone, and now you are talking about daylight savings time. Are you one of those people that can't stay on topic?
That's a solution optimized for a very small percentage of people who need to program with timezones. The rest of us don't care (and those of us using Joda-time don't care either).
Read my post again. I was responding to someone who said "property laws in China are so weak you can remove people by gunpoint." You need to go through the courts first, and it can take a while.
The study in the link you shared took a computer model (the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory's CM2.5 model) and used it to model rainfall in Australia. The model predicted that in the future, rainfall would decrease as more warming was globally felt. They found that recent changes in rainfall seemed consistent with the changes in warming.
Because the study relies so heavily on a climate model, the question is, "How accurate is the model?" According to the IPCC (AR5, chapter 9) climate models are not very accurate in predicting rainfall. The are also not good at predicting temperature changes in smaller areas (although their resolution is relatively small). (It might be pointed out that Australia is not particularly small.) Furthermore, rainfall in Australia is heavily dependent on ENSO, and models are not good at predicting ENSO (which is not surprising, considering how little data we have on ENSO).
Conclusion is that a model's predictions are interesting, but the error bars are too wide to draw any firm conclusions. If El Nino becomes less frequent, then Australia could easily see more rainfall as a result of AGW.
Slashdot Mirror
Would it surprise you to find out that most DB schemas don't have referential integrity?
Well, it couldn't remember how many horns a unicorn has by the second sentence, but you are right, it did seem to stay on topic.
Anyone who has ever built a data-driven website knows this. You never actually DELETE a record from a database.
You should know that this is probably illegal under GPDR. Yes, that is going to cause problems with database design, for reasons that anyone who has ever built a data-driven website knows.
I could go on but I'll just stop at the definition of a battery
Yeah you should, because you're sounding kind of ignorant! haha
The basics of chemical storage of energy means that no battery can ever be as energy dense as gasoline.
What basics are you talking about here?
Clearly these folks and their ideas are funded by the oil industry.
Oil isn't really a competitor to solar. Cars run on gas, power plants run on coal.
BP might want to get rid of electric cars, but they invest in solar plants.
There is nothing as energy dense, convenient, safe, and inexpensive as hydrocarbons
Hopefully batteries will be in 20 years. (btw gasoline is not safe.)
OSX and iOS are already the same OS with a slightly different GUI toolkit. Even those are rather similar.
Fuchsia is Google's NIH solution to the Linux kernel. They got tired of running their own custom fork (because it takes effort to merge) and thought it might be easier to make their own kernel. It's mainly a kernel.
It's something to look at. To put it into perspective, everything we eat both causes and cures cancer.
I didn't see that example in the article. Maybe you read it somewhere else?
What video?
Oh, first you were talking about a single worldwide timezone, and now you are talking about daylight savings time. Are you one of those people that can't stay on topic?
Despite bragging that their AI could stay on topic, the example they gave in the summary didn't stay on topic, in place, or even in the same century.
More importantly, you don't have to worry about getting sued for libel if the court finds him not guilty.
That's a solution optimized for a very small percentage of people who need to program with timezones. The rest of us don't care (and those of us using Joda-time don't care either).
Amazing, you don't know the definition of rational.
Read my post again. I was responding to someone who said "property laws in China are so weak you can remove people by gunpoint." You need to go through the courts first, and it can take a while.
I think you're an angry little nincompoop.
Caltrain still got money for their improvements, so Pelosi doesn't care.
It's not that easy in China, actually. Check out these nail houses. China has strengthened the property rights dramatically since the 50s.
Although China has a large population, the population density is also high, so there are a lot of wide-open spaces across the country.
There STILL isn't any clue about how to get rail from Bakersfield to Los Angeles
Really? Why not just route it over the grapevine, along the freeway? Seems fairly straightforward, to me.........
The study in the link you shared took a computer model (the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory's CM2.5 model) and used it to model rainfall in Australia. The model predicted that in the future, rainfall would decrease as more warming was globally felt. They found that recent changes in rainfall seemed consistent with the changes in warming.
Because the study relies so heavily on a climate model, the question is, "How accurate is the model?" According to the IPCC (AR5, chapter 9) climate models are not very accurate in predicting rainfall. The are also not good at predicting temperature changes in smaller areas (although their resolution is relatively small). (It might be pointed out that Australia is not particularly small.) Furthermore, rainfall in Australia is heavily dependent on ENSO, and models are not good at predicting ENSO (which is not surprising, considering how little data we have on ENSO).
Conclusion is that a model's predictions are interesting, but the error bars are too wide to draw any firm conclusions. If El Nino becomes less frequent, then Australia could easily see more rainfall as a result of AGW.
Fear is a valid human emotion
Every emotion is valid, every emotion is irrational. Emotion is the antithesis of rationality.
Link looks interesting I'll have to dig in deeper later.