Basically I'm saying that if you don't know how to write modular code, if you don't know how to define components in a way that corresponds to specific areas of the business domain (and that's not quite the right way to do it, but close enough), then it doesn't matter if you use microservices. Your microservice architecture will end up just as messy as your non-microservice architecture.
The underlying problem isn't microservice vs non-microservice: both can be fine architectures. The underlying problem is not knowing how to divide up your system into components, not being able to recognize the natural lines in the problem.
So, question, who exactly should go to jail for this? The actor who filmed the commercial? The CEO who probably hadn't even heard about the commercial before it went live? The marketer who came up with the idea?
In all honesty, the most effective thing would probably be to fine the company a significant amount of cash, because that will hit the shareholders in the wallets.
Real pragmatism is recognizing that popular languages are often the best tool for the job, no mater how aesthetically distasteful they are.
The only reason Javascript is the "best tool for the job" is because it's the only tool available. If you only have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail, and that describes Javascript perfectly. MFC was the the best choice for windows UIs for a long time, so I used it, but it still sucked (and still does suck).
To be fair, there can be benefits to the consumer as well.
That's worth considering as well. The fact that Microsoft will no longer have to make things 'flashy' means they can focus on making things solid. That's a potential benefit, but most likely they will do that for a while, then soon Windows will appear more like abandonware.
Another option for billing would be that you get 3 years of credit 'free' when you buy the computer. After that, you can either buy a new computer or pay for more windows-years. That is something manufacturers would go along with too. But that would not be a benefit for the consumer.
As the OS market becomes more and more mature and stable, Linux will become more and more attractive to more people.
If it works, it will be so great (from Microsoft's perspective). Not only will they be able to have a constant revenue stream, they won't have to come out with convincing upgrades anymore. In addition, they will be able to charge different amounts depending on your country. If you're from India, you can pay $0.5 a month or whatever. In America, more.
There are so many long-term advantages to subscription-based for the vendor, that if they can pull it off, it's worth almost any price.
Because the internet has been overtaken by brands.
At one time, not long ago, if you did a search for "Fortune" Google would return links for the BSD fortune program.
Now it returns links to Fortune magazine. SEO changed the internet to a model of whoever can push stuff hardest in your face, and Burger King won here.
That's ok, you don't need to hide that you are feeling something in that situation. If you want to hide it though, then your normal internal emotional experiences should become so dramatic that in comparison, laying down $100k is small and meaningless.
Slashdot Mirror
Purple purple ftw!
Basically I'm saying that if you don't know how to write modular code, if you don't know how to define components in a way that corresponds to specific areas of the business domain (and that's not quite the right way to do it, but close enough), then it doesn't matter if you use microservices. Your microservice architecture will end up just as messy as your non-microservice architecture.
The underlying problem isn't microservice vs non-microservice: both can be fine architectures. The underlying problem is not knowing how to divide up your system into components, not being able to recognize the natural lines in the problem.
FWIW you can do this pretty easily with git + gerrit.
the point is to define components that correspond to specific areas of the business domain.
If people were capable of that, they wouldn't be in the problem to begin with. Their system would already be suitably modular.
Hungary had been chafing for independence for a century at least already by that time.
It's a textbook case of self-selection bias.
Does anyone have a second opinion on that point?
Complexity is what makes me happy.
You can add to that list:
Programmers who don't like programming and only got into to it because of the money.
By the time fully autonomous cars hit the roads in a few years, this should be a totally solved problem.
If you're talking about SAE level 5 cars, then it sounds like you're the one who is dreaming.
How did that go, did you get a ticket?
So, question, who exactly should go to jail for this? The actor who filmed the commercial? The CEO who probably hadn't even heard about the commercial before it went live? The marketer who came up with the idea?
In all honesty, the most effective thing would probably be to fine the company a significant amount of cash, because that will hit the shareholders in the wallets.
Real pragmatism is recognizing that popular languages are often the best tool for the job, no mater how aesthetically distasteful they are.
The only reason Javascript is the "best tool for the job" is because it's the only tool available. If you only have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail, and that describes Javascript perfectly. MFC was the the best choice for windows UIs for a long time, so I used it, but it still sucked (and still does suck).
So I'll pass on joining this guy's fan club.
That's fine.
To be fair, there can be benefits to the consumer as well.
That's worth considering as well. The fact that Microsoft will no longer have to make things 'flashy' means they can focus on making things solid. That's a potential benefit, but most likely they will do that for a while, then soon Windows will appear more like abandonware.
Another option for billing would be that you get 3 years of credit 'free' when you buy the computer. After that, you can either buy a new computer or pay for more windows-years. That is something manufacturers would go along with too. But that would not be a benefit for the consumer.
As the OS market becomes more and more mature and stable, Linux will become more and more attractive to more people.
The parent's point is that China *can* make good stuff.
And the comment you were replying to was affirming that point.
Your homepage is actually really great. There is however a broken link on the front page.
If it works, it will be so great (from Microsoft's perspective). Not only will they be able to have a constant revenue stream, they won't have to come out with convincing upgrades anymore. In addition, they will be able to charge different amounts depending on your country. If you're from India, you can pay $0.5 a month or whatever. In America, more.
There are so many long-term advantages to subscription-based for the vendor, that if they can pull it off, it's worth almost any price.
Then why did Keizan Jokin say, "Strengthen your zen?"
Or I've done zen
And yet the iPhone is made in China.
Because the internet has been overtaken by brands.
At one time, not long ago, if you did a search for "Fortune" Google would return links for the BSD fortune program.
Now it returns links to Fortune magazine. SEO changed the internet to a model of whoever can push stuff hardest in your face, and Burger King won here.
The USDoJ agrees with me, and was in a position to ream Microsoft.
No, the USDoJ agrees (or agreed) that Microsoft abused their monopoly once they had it. That's not how they got their monopoly in the first place.
And I agree with you on that point, too.
or can do logic and arithmetic without going through manual algorithms like long division
How would you even do that?
That's ok, you don't need to hide that you are feeling something in that situation. If you want to hide it though, then your normal internal emotional experiences should become so dramatic that in comparison, laying down $100k is small and meaningless.
Seriously though, zen
Nice comment, btw. Thanks.
Mass is not the same thing as matter. You can have matter without mass such as with a photon.,
Can you really feel confident saying that photons are matter?