Its always bothered me that the majority of constants, like big G, must be measured and not derived
There is no other way. Science is the description of what we see. A model is a systematic description of many events observed over time. Even if you could find a way to derive G, it would be ultimately derived from other things that were observed.
And you only speak in vague generalities. Either learn to speak concretely, figure out how to support your ideas, or be gone back to the pool of ignorance you came from. Making a good argument is something you can do.
They weren't trustworthy to begin with. We've covered this a lot on Slashdot over the past decade and a half. The golden era of news media is long past, if it ever existed.
You are right that California could do nuclear now, but you are wrong that they will. New battery technology will be invented and they will use it, or they will fail. Too many people oppose nuclear in California. They would literally rather have intermittent power failures.
It might happen: they of course won't use nuclear, so it's all about solar and wind. Solar and wind depend on new battery technology being invented. If that happens, then California will be able to reach their goal.
Sorry pal, but when you grow up in the middle east, in a poor city, and you are not extremely talented (I am a good programmer when I want to, probably at the top 5-10%, but hardly a genius), you learn to be a jerk to survive.
Now you're just lying. You're a programmer, living in Israel. You're one of the richest people in the world, there is no poverty excuse there for you to be a jerk. It seems it's not even about money for you, you're just a jerk.
What happened to you? Did your parents abuse you as a child? Did you get PTSD in the military? I can relate.
If only people using Julia were good enough at math to add 1 to the total size of the array to adjust. I guess that's too hard for you, though. Incidentally, C is even better: because you can move the pointer, you can have the array start at any index, even negative indexes, without wasting any index space.
And those motherfuckers make the world worse for everyone. Same as people who throw their trash on the ground because they don't have an emotional attachment to putting it in a trash can.
Apparently, Dropbox is lacking the skills for that though.
The quality of programmer has gone down in the last five years in Silicon Valley, noticeably. It is very likely their programmers are lacking skills to work with Linux. Most likely they had a team of guys who had programmed a bit on Linux in college, and then spent a lot of time on StackOverflow trying to figure things out. That's how a lot of SV goes down these days, if you are lucky. If you aren't lucky they didn't do any Linux anywhere, can't read a man page, and get it all from StackOverflow.
This type of design is what I find is what developers make when they are at the "Arrogant Rookie" level of their career.
Where if there was a book on the technology, The skills used are from chapter 1 and the last chapter.
They are trying to show off how good they are by not doing things the easy way.
I've read before that "the "fire in a crowded theater" example is widely misused, but I never really understood why. Now reading your post, I understand, thanks. Just because speech is limited in certain narrow cases , that doesn't mean it is limited in the case at hand.
Slashdot Mirror
Weirdly I've never heard that theory/interpretation. Weird because it makes quite a bit of sense.
Its always bothered me that the majority of constants, like big G, must be measured and not derived
There is no other way. Science is the description of what we see. A model is a systematic description of many events observed over time. Even if you could find a way to derive G, it would be ultimately derived from other things that were observed.
And you only speak in vague generalities. Either learn to speak concretely, figure out how to support your ideas, or be gone back to the pool of ignorance you came from. Making a good argument is something you can do.
They're all bad. Some are better than others.
Distraction.
They weren't trustworthy to begin with. We've covered this a lot on Slashdot over the past decade and a half. The golden era of news media is long past, if it ever existed.
You are right that California could do nuclear now, but you are wrong that they will. New battery technology will be invented and they will use it, or they will fail. Too many people oppose nuclear in California. They would literally rather have intermittent power failures.
I don't think I am nice. I am subtle. I insult people in less direct ways. Lately I've been trying to be nicer. Fail today, I admit.
It all depends on improved battery technology. If that happens, then California will be able to reach their goal.
It might happen: they of course won't use nuclear, so it's all about solar and wind. Solar and wind depend on new battery technology being invented. If that happens, then California will be able to reach their goal.
If you can only see negative in C, and no positive, then you are blind, and can have nothing interesting to say on the topic.
Sorry pal, but when you grow up in the middle east, in a poor city, and you are not extremely talented (I am a good programmer when I want to, probably at the top 5-10%, but hardly a genius), you learn to be a jerk to survive.
Now you're just lying. You're a programmer, living in Israel. You're one of the richest people in the world, there is no poverty excuse there for you to be a jerk. It seems it's not even about money for you, you're just a jerk.
What happened to you? Did your parents abuse you as a child? Did you get PTSD in the military? I can relate.
That's true but for the purposes used in this thread, if you need to you can easily create a pointer to an array with zero runtime cost.
That's good, I'll check it, thx.
However, if someone told me I would be paid lots of money to throw garbage on the ground, I would gladly do it.
There are people in this world who are slaves for money.
If only people using Julia were good enough at math to add 1 to the total size of the array to adjust. I guess that's too hard for you, though. Incidentally, C is even better: because you can move the pointer, you can have the array start at any index, even negative indexes, without wasting any index space.
Cool thing about indexes starting at 0: you can just pretend the first element doesn't exist and suddenly your array starts at index 1.
when you want to automate class/schema mapping between layers
I honestly don't even know what this means. All I have is some vague idea. Do you have a practical example?
BTW, the dinosaurs didn't support Linux either, and look where it got THEM -- they're all dead. So I guess you're right after all.
Logic checks out.
And those motherfuckers make the world worse for everyone. Same as people who throw their trash on the ground because they don't have an emotional attachment to putting it in a trash can.
Apparently, Dropbox is lacking the skills for that though.
The quality of programmer has gone down in the last five years in Silicon Valley, noticeably. It is very likely their programmers are lacking skills to work with Linux. Most likely they had a team of guys who had programmed a bit on Linux in college, and then spent a lot of time on StackOverflow trying to figure things out. That's how a lot of SV goes down these days, if you are lucky. If you aren't lucky they didn't do any Linux anywhere, can't read a man page, and get it all from StackOverflow.
This type of design is what I find is what developers make when they are at the "Arrogant Rookie" level of their career. Where if there was a book on the technology, The skills used are from chapter 1 and the last chapter. They are trying to show off how good they are by not doing things the easy way.
This is a lot like "Second System Syndrome"
No, that's a misunderstanding. The courts use the abstraction, filtration, comparison test to determine what is a violation and what is not.
The only way it could be so comprehensive is if there was a bunch of Jews manufacturing it,
That makes sense, they had a lot of time, hard labor making records, in the concentration camps to do that kind of thing.
I've read before that "the "fire in a crowded theater" example is widely misused, but I never really understood why. Now reading your post, I understand, thanks. Just because speech is limited in certain narrow cases , that doesn't mean it is limited in the case at hand.